Next Article in Journal
Fuzzy Quality Evaluation Model Constructed by Process Quality Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Search for Tissue Equivalent Materials Based on Exposure and Energy Absorption Buildup Factor Computations
Previous Article in Journal
Anticancer Effects of Seaweed-Derived Bioactive Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Simulation Studies for the Characterization of a Cyclotron Liquid Target with Thick Niobium Target Windows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of X-ray Radiation Detectability Using Fabricated ZnO-PB Based Extended Gate Field-Effect Transistor as X-ray Dosimeters

by
Amal Mohamed Ahmed Ali
1,
Naser M. Ahmed
1,*,
Norlaili A. Kabir
1,
Mohammed Khalil Mohammed Ali
2,
Hanan Akhdar
2,*,
Osamah A. Aldaghri
2,
Khalid Hassan Ibnaouf
2 and
Abdelmoneim Sulieman
3
1
School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Seberang Perai 11800, Penang, Malaysia
2
Physics Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
3
Medical Imaging Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulziz University, P.O. Box 422, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11258; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311258
Submission received: 24 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 27 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear and Radiation Physics in Medicine)

Abstract

:
A new design of the MOSFET dosimeter is being developed in a different study to measure the dose delivered to the tissue layers. Development of zinc oxide-Lead (ZnO-Pb) of different thicknesses fabricated by chemical bath deposition were investigated to study their sensitivity following irradiation using a low absorbed dose that can be used in diagnostic and interventional radiology (9, 36.5, and 70 mGy) and high absorbed dose (1, 5, and 10 Gy) of X-ray. The morphology and structure of the as-prepared films were analysed using FESEM and XRD measurements. The device relies on sensing the changes in the local electric field arising from radiation interactions in the absorber, coupled with the semiconductor materials used in this work—ZnO-Pb as the EGFET. Then the sensitivity of all devices was examined. Generally, thin-film devices showed less sensitivity to X-ray than the disk type. The sensitivity of the thin film dropped from 6.66 mV/to 1.42 mV/Gy, while the sensitivity of the ZnO-Pb disk type was 23.3 mV/Gy, which then dropped to 6.30 6.42 mV/Gy. Furthermore, the disk type ZnO-Pb was exposed to a high absorbed dose and obtained a sensitivity value of 0.08 mV/Gy, while the ZnO-Pb thin film obtained 0.01 mV/Gy. This can be related to the influence of thickness on the sensitivity of the dosimeter. However, the device’s performance characteristics, like sensitivity to radiation exposure and operating dose area, were discovered to be strongly dependent on the materials employed, effective atomic number, and thickness of the materials. Based on the results shown above, these devices might be considered a low-cost candidate for real-time -radiation dosimetry at room temperature. Furthermore, the thickest sample of 1 mm showed better sensitivity to radiation, compared to the thinner samples.

1. Introduction

Radiation detectors are used in a variety of areas, including health, industry, and science. Ionizing radiation (X-and γ-ray) exposure may occur in these settings; therefore, proper radiation detection is critical for protecting the environment. The type of dosimeter used for a given application is determined by the energy range. Metal oxides are a well-known kind of substance utilized in dosimetry. It is concerned with the creation of particular structural flaws termed color centers as a result of radiation [1]. Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) might combine dose data and give an instant dose reading [2]. Because of its insensitivity to environmental conditions such as temperature and light, and even its flexibility extended gate, the extended-gate field-effect transistor (EGFET) structure has garnered greater attention in packaging and contact resistance. Furthermore, EGFETs may be utilized without exposing the metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) to irradiation, allowing it to be reused several times [3]. The EGFET design allows the MOSFET to be isolated from its biological or chemical surroundings. A sensing membrane is connected to the end of a signal line, which is connected to the MOSFET. Furthermore, by allowing the use of larger samples without being limited by the size of the MOSFET, this design gives a wider detection area [4]. Ionizing radiation dosimetry with irradiation sensor MOSFETs is dependent on translating the threshold voltage shift VTH into the absorbed dose D. This transition is caused by radiation-induced electron-hole pairs in the transistor’s gate oxide layer, which leads to a rise in the density of interface traps and the accumulation of positive trapped charge. Extended gate field effect transistors (EGFETs) have adjustable sensitivity, rendering them ideal for a wide range of applications. Sensitivity, for example, can be adjusted by varying the thickness of the gate oxide layer [5,6]. Instead, transistors can be stacked in specific circumstances [7,8]. The sensitivity could also be adjusted by providing a positive bias to the gate while it is being irradiated [9]. Electric charges are produced and trapped inside the gate oxide layer (Qox,i) or even at the oxide-silicon interface (Qit,i) when a MOSFET is exposed to photons. When Qox,i is positive, the transfer characteristics Id (drain current) against Vg (gate voltage) change towards negative voltages. The interface charges Qjt,i mostly contribute to the deterioration of the carriers mobility p inside the channel, reducing the slope of the linear component of the characteristics [10].
The threshold voltage VTH is defined as the point at which the linear component of the curve intersects the Vg axis and is provided by:
V TH   =   V TH 0     Qox , i   +   Qit , i Cox   =   V TH 0   +   V TH
Where VTH0 is the pre-irradiation value of the VTH and Cox is the capacitance of the gate. The measurement of the change ∆VTH of the threshold voltage after radiation allows the evaluation of the absorbed dose. Whenever the surface potential Ψs is equal to Fermi’s potential ΨF and Fermi’s level lies in the center of the semiconductor’s energy gap, interface traps are neutral (overall charge equals zero), regardless of the dispersion throughout the semiconductor energy gap. The charge of FT simply causes the shift between two subthreshold properties toward this VG-axis, and the gate voltage that correlates to such surface potentials is designated as VMG (midgap voltage) and might even be calculated as the ordinate of the (VMG, IMG) point at subthreshold features [11]. The VMG, i.e., VG which correlates to ID = IMG, may be determined as VMG= [log (IMG-n)/m] using the formula log (ID) = m.VG + n derived by the linear curve of subthreshold characteristic. VMG0 and VMG are discovered using this method. The straight lines generated by the linear fittings of subthreshold properties are gradually applied to the appropriate midgap current IMG.
∆Vft is the factor of threshold voltage changes caused by FT, as:
∆Vft = ∆VMG = VMG − VMG0
where VMG0 and VMG are the midgap voltages in between irradiation. Vst is the component of threshold voltage shift caused by ST.
∆Vst = (VT − VMG) − (VT0 − VMG0) =VS − VS0
where VT0 and VT are the threshold voltages of transistors before and after irradiation, respectively, and threshold voltage shift is ∆VT = VT − VT0. VT0 and VT are calculated from the saturation transfer characteristics as the junction of the VG-axis and the extrapolation linear area of the curves √ID = ƒVG. [12]. Optical thin films have been the focus of conducting film research. Because of its advantages, such as economic feasibility and nontoxicity, ZnO thin films have indeed been employed in a variety of applications [13,14]. According to reports, ZnO has (i) better quantum efficiency, (ii) great photochemical characteristics, and (iii) the capacity to produce a high-quality single crystal at a low price [15]. It is also a low-cost luminous and biofriendly oxide semiconductor device. Appropriately, ZnO is predicted to find widespread use in UV laser, biosensing, bio-imaging, drug development, and other fields. Doping substances with ZnO, such as lead (Pb), offers benefits. They discovered that Pb does have an impact on the size and shape of ZnO [16]. The inclusion of lead nanoparticles is accountable for the modified electrode’s increased sensor activity. The significant improvement might be attributed to the synergistic impact of both Pb and ZnO nanoparticles [17]. In this work, ZnO-Pb thin and thick film were synthesised via chemical bath deposition (CBD) and their structural and morphological properties investigated. The samples were applied to use as low and high radiation detector-based EGFET.

2. Materials and Methods

In total, 2.615 g of Zinc Nitrate (Zn (NO3)2, 6H2O) and 1.4 g of hexamethylenetetramine (C6H12N4) were added to 200 mL deionized water to prepare a solution of 50 mM. The solution was then stirred for 1 h at room temperature. 3.31 g of Lead (II) Nitrate Pb (NO3)2 salt was added to the solution and stirred continuously. A ZnO seed layer on glass substrates were immersed upside down to the solution, then covered and kept in a chemical bath deposition for 8 h at 90 °C. The thin film was then removed, washed with deionized water, and dried in air. These steps were repeated three times to increase the thickness of the films. The film thickness was then measured by FESEM, and it was found that the thickness reached 46 µm. The solution was filtered and dried using an oven at 80 °C for 15 min, then pressed with a hydraulic press to 1 mm thickness.
XRD was used to study the structural properties and the particle size for both films was calculated using Scherer’s formula, as mentioned in [18]:
d   =   0.89 λ B c o s   θ β
where B is the crystalline XRD peak’s entire width at half maximum, θβ is the Bragg’s angle, and λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm). FESEM was also used to study the morphological properties of the samples and then the Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) model was used to determine the fractional weight of each element in a combination. Since the sample is a mixture of elements, effective atomic number (Zeff) of the mixture was obtained using Equation (5) [19]:
Zeff   =   f 1 Z 1 2.94   +     f 2 Z 2 2.94   +   .   fn Z n 2.94 2.94
where, f = the weight fractions for every component in the medium of interest in relation to the total number of electrons consumed within the compound/mixture that forms the medium. Z denotes the atomic number of every element included in the medium. The value used for actual practical applications is generally 2.94 [19]. Silver electrodes were deposited as fingerprint interdigitated on the samples, and silver paste was used to connect the wires. The samples were then connected as an extended gate to the MOSFET to study the I-V characterization under a low absorbed dose (9, 36 and 70 mGy) using the X-ray machine at the School of Physics, USM, and high absorbed dose (1, 5 and 10 Gy) using a radiotherapy machine (Elekta) at Gleneagles Hospital, Penang, Malaysia.
MOSFET is connected to the semiconductor thick film through the gate to keep the first device away from radiation. Radiation interacts directly with semiconductors, which leads to changes in their properties, such as increase in the amount of current that reaches the MOSFET. The current increases as the amount of radiation dose increases. The EGFET connection setup is mentioned in [18]. The sensing component (ZnO-Pb) and a commercialized MOSFET (CD4007UB) are the two primary components of an EGFET. Figure 1 depicts the ZnO-Pb-based EGFET X-ray detector. The sensing portion of the sensor was linked to a gate of the MOSFET. The sensing layer was exposed to an X-ray source before being attached to the measuring equipment. The dosimeter’s reaction was examined using a Keithley 2400 and Lab Tracer 2 software. The connection used in this work is mentioned in [18].
The film’s sensitivity was measured in terms of the threshold voltage (VTH), which was determined using Equation (1) [20]. The detection sensitivity of the samples to X-ray exposure was determined using the formula below:
S = VTH/D
where S denotes sensitivity and D indicates the absorbed dose.

3. Results and Discussion

Properties of the thin films and disks: Figure 2 shows the FESEM images for the morphology of ZnO-Pb thin films deposited on glass substrates and for disks prepared by using CBD. The thin film’s morphology consists of hexagonal crystal formations that are perfectly aligned and tightly packed nanorods. This result agrees with a previous work [21]. The fractional atomic percentage of the ZnO-Pb thin film was determined by using the (EDX) technique. Figure 2A also shows the EDX results of the ZnO-Pb thin film. Figure 2B presents that in the FESEM micrographs of the ZnO-Pb disk type images, the ZnO-Pb grains appeared as a homogeneous nanorod shape. The same figure also shows the fractional atomic percentage of an investigated ZnO-Pb disk type obtained via EDX procedures. Equation (5) was used to determine the Zeff of the studied samples, which was found to be 72.5.
Figure 3A represents the crystalline peaks of ZnO-Pb for thin films. The diffraction peaks observed at diffraction angles 2θ of 31.37° and 36.22° correspond to (100) and (101) plans of the ZnO-Pb thin film. The amorphous nature of the thin film pattern is due to the lack of thin film thickness. On the other hand, Figure 3B shows the diffraction peaks of the disk type powder at angles 2θ of 31.66°, 34.34°, 36.16°, 47.46°, 56.45°, and 62.71° corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), and (103) plans of ZnO-Pb disk, respectively. The essential characteristics of the diffraction patterns are identical, but the relative strength of the diffraction peaks rises as the film thickness increases [22]. The average crystal size of the nanostructured ZnO-Pb, as calculated from the Scherrer formula Equation (4), is shown in Table 1
As shown in Figure 1, the ZnO-Pb thin film (TF) and disk type (1 mm) were selected as EGFETs and applied as radiation sensors. The radiation sensitivity of the membranes was tested using various radiation doses (9, 36.5, and 70 mGy). As illustrated in Figure 4A,B, the results of these measurements were converted into I-V curves in both linear and saturation regimes (B). The linear regime was reached with a steady drain-to-source voltage (Vds) of 0.3 V and the saturation regime with a fixed gate-to-source voltage (Vgs) of 3 V. The linear regime curves show a shift of the threshold voltage to the left by increasing the absorbed dose, while the saturation regime curves show the current increased by increasing the doses of radiation up to 70 mGy for the low absorbed dose. This increasing of the current in the saturation regime can be due to electron–hole pairs being formed during irradiation, resulting in higher electrical properties such as current [23]. The effect of the absorbed dose led to increment of the current; these modifications are greatly influenced by the internal composition of the ingested chemicals. The interaction process of X-rays with substances is essentially based on electronic excitation, electronic ionization, and atomic movement of outer electrons [24].
The ZnO-Pb thin film showed an increment in optical density up to the current level, less than 1.2 × 10−3 A under absorbed dose 70 mGy, whereas thicker films 1 mm ZnO-Pb sustained higher level of current 1.4 × 10−3 A with a standard error varied from 3.4 × 10−4 A for thin film to 8.546 × 10−4 A for 1 mm thickness under the same absorbed dose and revealed detectable changes in its electrical characteristics. This is due to the fact that the deterioration is more severe with greater dosage and thinner films [25]. The change in the current ΔI for the thin film was found to be 85 μA; this amount increased for 1 mm thickness to reach 172 μA. Also, from the graphs, we can notice that the 1 mm ZnO-Pb disk responded to radiation more than the thin film because of the presence of Pb, which has a high Zeff under low radiation dose, which interacts with radiation through the photoelectric effect and produces more photons, leading to increase in the current [26]. The current and voltage sensitivity values of TF and 1 mm ZnO-Pb were calculated by plotting (I–Dose value) and (V-Dose value) curves, as mentioned in Figure 5. The voltage of the system was found to be decreased by increasing the absorbed dose from 3.13 V to 2.90 V, within standard error ±0.0118 V for the thin film and from 3.57 V to 3.06 V ± 0.03 V for the 1 mm disk type. The linearity of the sensors was shown to be 94.5% for the thin film and 96.5% for the 1 mm ZnO-Pb. In addition, small thicknesses are more sensitive to low radiation doses than high radiation dose [27]. The threshold voltage of the ZnO-Pb samples was calculated by using Equation (1); it shows that for all samples, the threshold voltage rose by increasing the absorbed dose value and increasing the thickness of the samples (Figure 6). According to the graphs, increase in the thickness of ZnO-Pb from several μm to 1 mm leads to a noticeable magnification in the ∆VTH from 0.06 to 0.1 V for the thin film, and from 0.21 to 0.45 V for the 1 mm disk. Furthermore, as the sample thickness rises, so does the sensitivity of the dosimeter from 1.42 mV/mGy for the thin film to 6.42 mV/mGy for the 1 mm disk under radiation dose 70 mGy. Because the thick gate allows for more effective separation of electron-hole pairs produced within the oxide, the sensitivity will improve [28]. The sensitivity of the samples was measured using Equation (6); the sensitivity of the samples decreased on increasing the dose and increased with a rise in thickness of the devices. The characteristic results of the ZnO-Pb thin film and disk type are tabulated in Table 2. One feature of the EGFET sensor that is observed with every detector is the inherent reduction in sensitivity with increased absorbed dose. This is thought to be produced by changes in the effective electric field supplied to the EGFET during irradiation, which results in a buildup of holes at the gate oxide contact [29].
Current-voltage curves were plotted as shown in Figure 7A,B. The figures describe the radiation sensing characteristics of the ZnO-Pb thin film and the 1 mm disk type under high absorbed doses (1, 5, and 10 Gy). These curves reflect a higher current value, compared to the same previous dosimeters exposed to low radiation doses. Moreover, the current value increased more in the sample 1 mm ZnO-Pb disk type than in the thin film. This is because ionizing radiation produces structural flaws (called color centers), which cause their density to vary as X-ray exposure increases [30]. High-energy radiations alter the physical characteristics of the materials through which they pass. The existence of oxygen vacancies influences the reactivity of oxide materials [31]. Moreover, the current value increased more in the sample 1 mm ZnO-Pb disk type than that in the thin film—∆I for the thin film = 73 μA and 1 mm = 189 μA. Oxygen vacancies are present naturally in all oxides as Shottky or Frenkel faults, and their density can be raised or decreased in a variety of methods [32]. In the former scenario, the vacancy relates to two electrons. Increasing the radiation dose leads to rise in the defects.
From the above curves, the slopes of the (Ids-Dose value) and (Vgs-Dose value) were used to calculate the present sensitivity and linearity of the detector to radiation (Figure 8): 5.80 μA/Gy ± 0.545 μA, 90.4% for the thin film and 21.5 μA/Gy ± 0.14 μA, 96.8% for 1 mm ZnO-Pb, for saturation and linear regimes, respectively. Also, the current rose on increasing the dose in the saturation regime, while the voltage decreases with a rise in the dose in the linear regime from 3.22 V to 2.94 V ± 0.028 V for the thin film and from 3.28 V to 3.04 V ± 0.02 V for the 1 mm thickness one. The threshold voltage of the samples shows that for all samples, the threshold voltage increased on increasing the absorbed dose value and increasing the thickness of the samples. Because the possibility of particle ionization by photoelectric effect is considerably greater than that by Compton’s effect, a greater number of positive trap charge is created during low dose X-ray irradiation than during high dose X-ray irradiation, which obviously impacts the variety of values in the predominance of Compton interaction, as in this case [26].
The sensitivity of the samples decreased on increasing the absorbed dose and increases on increasing the thickness of the samples. Figure 9 shows the threshold voltage and sensitivity plotting for all samples with absorbed dose value. We can notice that 1 mm ZnO-Pb has higher ∆VTH value and sensitivity than the other sample with lower thicknesses. The sensitivity of an MOS sensor is greatly dependent on the thickness of gate oxide (TOX). The oxide functions as an ionization chamber, where TOX defines the ionization volume. In addition, as the thickness increases, the capacity of the oxide (COX) decreases, so that at the same trapped load, the variation in the gate voltage is higher. The sensitivity of MOS dosimeters increases on the one hand with increasing ionization volume, and on the other with decreasing oxide capacity, then increases in TOX, twice leading to increases in sensitivity. Therefore, the sensitivity has a dependence approximately proportional to TOX [33]. On the other hand, increasing the absorbed dose up to 10 Gy led to a drop in the sensitivity value for all the samples. This reduction in sensitivity with the applied dose is generated by changes in the functional electric field delivered to the EGFET throughout irradiations, which produces an accumulation of holes just at the oxide gate interface [34]. Table 3 summarizes the results of irradiation to a high X-ray dose.

4. Conclusions

Designing a measuring system utilizing the EGFET has clear advantages because of the low cost of production. The thin film and disk type extended gate was fabricated using CBD technique. The X-ray response of the examined samples was measured by varying the threshold voltage and measuring the continuous drain current. According to the findings, EGFETs exhibit high linearity in the threshold voltage shift with radiation dosage; however, they are less sensitive to X-ray within the absorbed dose range of 1–10 Gy, as compared to their effective implementation for detection of low absorbed doses. Furthermore, due to the dominance of the photoelectric effect in this range of energies, EGFETs respond well at low energies (100 keV). The greater photoelectric cross-section for metal than for metal oxide means that secondary electrons produced in the metal will cross into the metal oxide and contribute to the absorbed dose. To summarize, the rising dominance of photoelectric absorption and dose enhancement, as the incident absorbed dose between 9 mGy to 70 mGy, results in an increase in sensor sensitivity. According to the findings, these EGFETs may provide an acceptable response at considerably lower absorbed doses, allowing for their effective implementation in detecting low doses of several mGy utilized in diagnostic and therapeutic radiology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M.A. and K.H.I.; methodology, N.M.A.; software, A.S.; validation, M.K.M.A., H.A. and O.A.A.; formal analysis, A.M.A.A.; investigation, A.M.A.A.; resources, H.A., O.A.A.; data curation, N.A.K. and K.H.I.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.A.A.; writing—review and editing, N.M.A., H.A., O.A.A., K.H.I. and A.S.; visualization, N.A.K.; supervision, N.M.A. and N.A.K.; project administration, M.K.M.A., O.A.A., H.A., K.H.I. and A.S.; funding acquisition, M.K.M.A., H.A. and O.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for funding this work through Research Group No. RG-21-09-52.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for funding this work. The authors extend their appreciation to School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia for the facilities and the technical support. The authors gratefully acknowledge Ahmed Alsadig (University of Trieste) for his kind assistance throughout this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arshak, K.; Korostynska, O. Response of metal oxide thin film structures to radiation. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2006, 133, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thomson, I.; Thomas, R.; Berndt, L. Radiation dosimetry with MOS sensors. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 1983, 6, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yin, L.-T.; Chou, J.-C.; Chung, W.-Y.; Sun, T.-P.; Hsiung, S.-K. Study of indium tin oxide thin film for separative extended gate ISFET. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2001, 70, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmed, N.M.; Kabaa, E.A.; Jaafar, M.S.; Omar, A.F. Characteristics of extended-gate field-effect transistor (EGFET) based on porous n-type (111) silicon for use in pH sensors. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 5804–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ristic, G.; Golubovic, S.; Pejovic, M. pMOS dosimeter with two-layer gate oxide operated at zero and negative bias. Electron. Lett. 1994, 30, 295–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ristić, G.; Jakšić, A.; Pejović, M. pMOS dosimetric transistors with two-layer gate oxide. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 1997, 63, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. O’Connell, B.; Conneely, C.; McCarthy, C.; Doyle, J.; Lane, W.; Adams, L. Electrical performance and radiation sensitivity of stacked PMOS dosimeters under bulkbias control. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1998, 45, 2689–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarrabayrouse, G.; Buchdahl, D.; Polischuk, V.; Siskos, S. Stacked-MOS ionizing radiation dosimeters: Potentials and limitations. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2004, 71, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarrabayrouse, G.; Gessinn, F. Thick oxide MOS transistors for ionizing radiation dose measurement. Radioprotection 1994, 29, 557–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vettese, F.; Donichak, C.; Bourgeault, P.; Sarrabayrouse, G. Assessment of a new p-MOSFET usable as a doserate insensitive gamma dose sensor. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1996, 43, 991–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pejovic, M.M. P-channel MOSFET as a sensor and dosimeter of ionizing radiation. Facta Univ. Ser. Electron. Energetics 2016, 29, 509–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sze, S. Semiconductor device development in the 1970’s and 1980’s—A perspective. Proc. IEEE 1981, 69, 1121–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gordillo, G.; Calderon, C. Properties of ZnO thin films prepared by reactive evaporation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2001, 69, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baydogan, N.; Ozdemir, O.; Cimenoglu, H. The improvement in the electrical properties of nanospherical ZnO: Al thin film exposed to irradiation using a Co-60 radioisotope. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 89, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Özgür, Ü.; Alivov, Y.I.; Liu, C.; Teke, A.; Reshchikov, M.A.; Dogan, S.; Avrutin, V.; Cho, S.-J.; Morkoc, H. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kannadasan, N.; Shanmugam, N.; Cholan, S.; Sathishkumar, K.; Viruthagiri, G.; Poonguzhali, R. Optical and electrochemical characteristics of Pb ions doped ZnO nanocrystals. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2014, 14, 1760–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kannadasan, N.; Shanmugam, N.; Sathishkumar, K.; Cholan, S.; Ponnguzhali, R.; Viruthagiri, G. Optical behavior and sensor activity of Pb ions incorporated ZnO nanocrystals. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 143, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ali, A.M.A.; Ahmed, N.M.; Kabir, N.A.; Almessiere, M.A. Multilayer ZnO/Pb/G thin film based extended gate field effect transistor for low dose gamma irradiation detection. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2021, 987, 164833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, F.M.; Gibbons, J.P. Khan’s the Physics of Radiation Therapy; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Korostynska, O.; Hickey, G.; Forde, E. Ozone and gamma radiation sensing properties of In2O3: ZnO: SnO2 thin films. Microsyst. Technol. 2008, 14, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, A.M.A.; Ahmed, N.M.; Kabir, N.A.; Mohammad, S.M. Investigation on the characteristics of ZnO and ZnO-Pb structure for gamma radiation detection. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1535, 012028. [Google Scholar]
  22. Taherniya, A.; Raoufi, D. Thickness dependence of structural, optical and morphological properties of sol-gel derived TiO2 thin film. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 016417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arshak, K.; Corcoran, J.; Korostynska, O. Gamma radiation sensing properties of TiO2, ZnO, CuO and CdO thick film pn-junctions. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2005, 123, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. El-Mallawany, R.; Abousehly, A.; El-Rahamani, A.A.; Yousef, E. Radiation effect on the ultrasonic attenuation and internal friction of tellurite glasses. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1998, 52, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arshak, K.; Korostynska, O.; Harriss, J. /spl gamma/-radiation dosimetry using screen printed nickel oxide thick films. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Microelectronics, Nis, Yugoslavia, 12–15 May 2002; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pejović, M.; Ciraj-Bjelac, O.; Kovačević, M.; Rajović, Z.; Ilić, G. Sensitivity of P-channel MOSFET to X-and gamma-ray irradiation. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 2013, 158403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pejović, M.M.; Pejović, M.M.; Jakšić, A.B. Radiation-sensitive field effect transistor response to gamma-ray irradiation. Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Prot. 2011, 26, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asensio, L.; Carvajal, M.A.; Lopez-Villanueva, J.A.; Vilches, M.; Lallena, A.M.; Palma, A.J. Evaluation of a low-cost commercial mosfet as radiation dosimeter. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2006, 125, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lavallée, M.C.; Gingras, L.; Beaulieu, L. Energy and integrated dose dependence of MOSFET dosimeter sensitivity for irradiation energies between and. Med. Phys. 2006, 33, 3683–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, R.-Y. Radiation damage in scintillating crystals. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1998, 413, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pacchioni, G.; Pescarmona, P. Structure and stability of oxygen vacancies on sub-surface, terraces, and low-coordinated surface sites of MgO: An ab initio study. Surf. Sci. 1998, 412, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pacchioni, G. AB initio Theory of Point Defects in SiO2. In Defects in SiO2 and Related Dielectrics: Science and Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 161–195. [Google Scholar]
  33. Holmes-Siedle, A.; Ravotti, F.; Glaser, M. The dosimetric performance of RADFETs in radiation test beams. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–27 July 2007; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dozier, C.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Brown, D.B.; Winokur, P.S. An evaluation of low-energy X-ray and cobalt-60 irradiations of MOS transistors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1987, 34, 1535–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The connection used in this work for EGFET.
Figure 1. The connection used in this work for EGFET.
Applsci 11 11258 g001
Figure 2. FESEM images of the nanostructured ZnO-Pb (A) thin film and (B) powder of the disk, and their EDX.
Figure 2. FESEM images of the nanostructured ZnO-Pb (A) thin film and (B) powder of the disk, and their EDX.
Applsci 11 11258 g002
Figure 3. XRD graphs for (A) thin film ZnO-Pb and (B) 1 mm disk ZnO-Pb.
Figure 3. XRD graphs for (A) thin film ZnO-Pb and (B) 1 mm disk ZnO-Pb.
Applsci 11 11258 g003
Figure 4. (A) Linear and saturation regime for the thin film and (B) linear and saturation regime for the 1 mm disk ZnO-Pb, under low absorbed dose.
Figure 4. (A) Linear and saturation regime for the thin film and (B) linear and saturation regime for the 1 mm disk ZnO-Pb, under low absorbed dose.
Applsci 11 11258 g004
Figure 5. (A) Voltage vs. dose and (B) current vs. dose for both the thin film and the disk ZnO-Pb.
Figure 5. (A) Voltage vs. dose and (B) current vs. dose for both the thin film and the disk ZnO-Pb.
Applsci 11 11258 g005
Figure 6. (A) Threshold voltage vs. dose and (B) sensitivity vs. dose for the ZnO-Pb thin film and disks irradiated with the low dose.
Figure 6. (A) Threshold voltage vs. dose and (B) sensitivity vs. dose for the ZnO-Pb thin film and disks irradiated with the low dose.
Applsci 11 11258 g006
Figure 7. (A) Linear and saturation regime for the thin film and (B) linear and saturation regime for the 1 mm disk ZnO-Pb, under high absorbed dose.
Figure 7. (A) Linear and saturation regime for the thin film and (B) linear and saturation regime for the 1 mm disk ZnO-Pb, under high absorbed dose.
Applsci 11 11258 g007
Figure 8. (A) Voltage vs. dose and (B) current vs. dose for the thin film and disk ZnO-Pb.
Figure 8. (A) Voltage vs. dose and (B) current vs. dose for the thin film and disk ZnO-Pb.
Applsci 11 11258 g008
Figure 9. (A) Threshold voltage vs. dose and (B) sensitivity vs. dose for the ZnO-Pb thin film and the disk irradiated with high dose.
Figure 9. (A) Threshold voltage vs. dose and (B) sensitivity vs. dose for the ZnO-Pb thin film and the disk irradiated with high dose.
Applsci 11 11258 g009
Table 1. The particles size and (Zeff) for the samples used in the study.
Table 1. The particles size and (Zeff) for the samples used in the study.
SampleTF Particle Size (nm)Disk Particle Size (nm)Effective Atomic Number
ZnO-Pb6.9715.9772.5
Table 2. Radiation sensing characteristics of ZnO-Pb under low radiation doses and various thicknesses.
Table 2. Radiation sensing characteristics of ZnO-Pb under low radiation doses and various thicknesses.
SampleAbsorbed Dose (mGy)Linearity %Threshold Voltage (mV)Sensitivity
(mV/mGy)(µA/mGy)
TF ZnO-Pb994.5606.661.05
36.5802.19
701001.42
1 mm disk ZnO-Pb996.521023.32.28
36.52306.30
705407.71
Table 3. Radiation sensing characteristics of ZnO-Pb under high radiation doses and various thicknesses.
Table 3. Radiation sensing characteristics of ZnO-Pb under high radiation doses and various thicknesses.
SampleAbsorbed Dose (Gy)Linearity (%)Threshold Voltage (mV)Sensitivity
(mV/Gy)(µA/Gy)
TF ZnO-Pb190.40.040.045.80
50.070.014
100.10.01
1 mm disk ZnO-Pb196.80.080.0821.5
50.330.066
100.40.04
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed Ali, A.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Kabir, N.A.; Ali, M.K.M.; Akhdar, H.; Aldaghri, O.A.; Ibnaouf, K.H.; Sulieman, A. Investigation of X-ray Radiation Detectability Using Fabricated ZnO-PB Based Extended Gate Field-Effect Transistor as X-ray Dosimeters. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11258. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311258

AMA Style

Ahmed Ali AM, Ahmed NM, Kabir NA, Ali MKM, Akhdar H, Aldaghri OA, Ibnaouf KH, Sulieman A. Investigation of X-ray Radiation Detectability Using Fabricated ZnO-PB Based Extended Gate Field-Effect Transistor as X-ray Dosimeters. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(23):11258. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed Ali, Amal Mohamed, Naser M. Ahmed, Norlaili A. Kabir, Mohammed Khalil Mohammed Ali, Hanan Akhdar, Osamah A. Aldaghri, Khalid Hassan Ibnaouf, and Abdelmoneim Sulieman. 2021. "Investigation of X-ray Radiation Detectability Using Fabricated ZnO-PB Based Extended Gate Field-Effect Transistor as X-ray Dosimeters" Applied Sciences 11, no. 23: 11258. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop