Next Article in Journal
Simulation of the Infiltration of Fractured Rock in the Unsaturated Zone
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of the KINEROS 2 Model to Natural Basin for Estimation of Erosion
Previous Article in Journal
Behaviour of the Steel Welded Grid during a Simplified Pullout Test in Fine Sand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Water Quality Improvement in Urban Stream Using MIKE 21 FM
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 19
10.3390/app11199144
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of Infiltration Rainwater Drainage (IRD) System with Fully 3-D Numerical Simulation Approach

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(19), 9144; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199144
by Jungkyu Ahn 1, Seongil Yeom 2, Sungwon Park 3,* and Thi Hoang Thao Nguyen 1,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(19), 9144; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199144
Submission received: 19 August 2021 / Revised: 25 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 1 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced in Smart Water Grid at Water Supply Systems: Principle and Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. Numerical values of coefficients that are used in the RANS model are not provided. Author's found there own or used standard coefficients?This should be provided in the paper.
  2. Please check English language, some minor mistakes could be found in the text.

Author Response

We appreciate your kind comments and reviews on our manuscript. We added definitions of numerical modeling in the text and tables, considering your comments very carefully. In addition, we modified and rearranged the manuscript. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

please find my comments on your manuscript.

Regards

Reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

As you commented, we added the units in the equations of the manuscript. Thankfully, we have completed corrections for repeated expressions along with English corrections for the entire manuscript as you recommended.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments:

1) Figure 3 is missing coordinates.

2) Literature part has been extented just by two papers. That is not enough and requires further extension.

3) There are no changes incorporated into Conclusions part, even tough the authors state so. Also, I don't see comments on how the outcomes of the study could be used by other researchers.

4) Discussion part is unacceptable. I suggest that authors look at some already published papers how this section should be looking like.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your helpful reviews and comments. I and my co-authors tried to figure out your points about our manuscript. We changed the color of paragraphs and sentences we modified.

Also as you mentioned, we changed the order of discussion and conclusions and modified several sentences.

thank you

 

Sung Won Park (correspoding author) 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

thank you for the changes that you have incorporated into the manuscript. In my opinion, it can be published in the current form.

Regards

Reviewer

Back to TopTop