You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Jungkyu Ahn1,
  • Seongil Yeom2 and
  • Sungwon Park3,*
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. Numerical values of coefficients that are used in the RANS model are not provided. Author's found there own or used standard coefficients?This should be provided in the paper.
  2. Please check English language, some minor mistakes could be found in the text.

Author Response

We appreciate your kind comments and reviews on our manuscript. We added definitions of numerical modeling in the text and tables, considering your comments very carefully. In addition, we modified and rearranged the manuscript. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

please find my comments on your manuscript.

Regards

Reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

As you commented, we added the units in the equations of the manuscript. Thankfully, we have completed corrections for repeated expressions along with English corrections for the entire manuscript as you recommended.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments:

1) Figure 3 is missing coordinates.

2) Literature part has been extented just by two papers. That is not enough and requires further extension.

3) There are no changes incorporated into Conclusions part, even tough the authors state so. Also, I don't see comments on how the outcomes of the study could be used by other researchers.

4) Discussion part is unacceptable. I suggest that authors look at some already published papers how this section should be looking like.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your helpful reviews and comments. I and my co-authors tried to figure out your points about our manuscript. We changed the color of paragraphs and sentences we modified.

Also as you mentioned, we changed the order of discussion and conclusions and modified several sentences.

thank you

 

Sung Won Park (correspoding author) 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

thank you for the changes that you have incorporated into the manuscript. In my opinion, it can be published in the current form.

Regards

Reviewer