Next Article in Journal
An Empirical Evaluation of Online Continuous Authentication and Anomaly Detection Using Mouse Clickstream Data Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Conventional and Non-Conventional Extraction Methods to Obtain Functional Ingredients from Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) Tissues and By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
PoreAnalyzer—An Open-Source Framework for the Analysis and Classification of Defects in Additive Manufacturing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immobilization of Pectinolytic Enzymes on Nylon 6/6 Carriers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 13
10.3390/app11136089
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of a New Fermented Beverage from Medicinal Plants and Organic Sugarcane Molasses via Lactic Fermentation

by
Hamza Gadhoumi
1,2,*,
Maria Gullo
3,
Luciana De Vero
3,
Enriqueta Martinez-Rojas
4,
Moufida Saidani Tounsi
2 and
El Akrem Hayouni
2
1
Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
2
Laboratory of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Center of Biotechnology at the Ecopark of Borj-Cédria, BP 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia
3
Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Partner of the JRU MIRRI-IT, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
4
Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(13), 6089; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136089
Submission received: 26 May 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 28 June 2021 / Published: 30 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Food, Bioproducts and Natural Byproducts for a Sustainable Future: From Conventional to Innovative Processes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Functional beverages obtained using medicinal plants and fermented with lactic acid bacteria are gaining much interest from the scientific community, driven by the growing demand for food and beverages with beneficial properties. In this work, three different batches of medicinal plants and organic sugarcane molasses, named FB-lc, FB-sp and FB-lcsp, were prepared and fermented by using Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121, Bifidobacterium breve B632 and a mix of both strains’ culture, respectively. The three fermented beverages revealed a high level of polyphenols (expressed as gallic acid equivalent), ranging from 182.50 to 315.62 µg/mL. The highest content of flavonoids (152.13 µg quercetin equivalent/mL) and tannins (93.602 µg catechin equivalent/mL) was detected in FB-lcsp trial. The IR spectroscopy analysis showed a decrease in sugar (pyranose forms, D-glucopyranose and rhamnosides). In addition, the aromatic compounds of the fermented beverages, detected by GC-MS headspace analysis, showed twenty-four interesting volatile compounds, which could give positive aroma attributes to the flavor of the beverages. The highest antioxidant activity was observed in the beverage obtained by the mix culture strains. Accordingly, the production of these beverages can be further investigated for considering their well-being effects on human health.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, medicinal plants have been used for human well-being as they are a source of healthy metabolic compounds. They still are widely used for the production of food, medicines and fuel. The improvement of the biological properties of plants, vegetables and herbs can be achieved through fermentation technology, which can transform complex substrates and change the quantity of some bioactive compounds [1]. Additionally, the fermentation process allows the preservation of food and beverages while improving the nutritional and organoleptic quality of the products [2]. Selected microorganisms are widely applied to obtain fermented foods and beverages. Among them, yeasts, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) are the main organisms with beneficial technological applications and for which a wide knowledge of use is available [3,4]. In some cases, mixed cultures are preferred over single cultures since they can offer improved processes and higher flavor and bioactive compound content [5], as well as health benefits [6]. Applying selected microbial cultures to suitable raw materials, the fermentation process can be modulated, also enhancing the content of bioactive metabolites and other compounds with antioxidant activity [7,8,9,10]. Since the production of specific metabolites is a strain-specific trait, the choice of microorganisms for the intended use is fundamental to obtain fermented products with enhanced properties [11,12,13].
A comprehensive inventory of microorganisms and their status as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) and/or QPS (qualified presumption of safety) organisms for the intended use is provided by Bourdichon and Casaregola [14].
In particular, LAB strains can produce key volatile compounds, active amino acids, peptides and sugars that contribute to the final flavor of fermented food products [15,16,17].
Moreover, due to the probiotic activity of some LAB, they can confer further attributes to fermented foods and beverages [18,19].
Plants are also suitable substrates for the growth of LAB [20,21,22]. Aromatic and medicinal plants are particularly valuable for selective bioprocesses as they already contain many bioactive compounds, including phenolic compounds, carotenoids, anthocyanins and tocopherols [23,24]. Moreover, the content of these compounds can be increased by the metabolic activity of the microorganisms involved in the fermentation process [25,26,27]. The metabolism of phenolic compounds correlated with increased antioxidant activity was observed during lactic acid fermentation [23,28].
Several authors have successfully obtained fermented products with improved antioxidant activity from vegetables, fruits, sugarcane molasses or plants [29,30]. Functional beverages that contain significant amounts of bioactive compounds can offer several health benefits. For instance, they can prevent some damaging physiological activities including metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Several LAB strains have been proposed as candidate probiotics due to their ability to provide functional attributes to foods and beverages.
Within the Bifidobacterium genus, some species are reported as potential probiotics for the treatment of enteric disorders in newborns such as infantile colics or as preventive agents for infantile diarrhea of bacterial origin. This function was also associated with strong antimicrobial activity against coliforms and other pathogenic bacteria [18]. Moreover, Lactobacillus species show several probiotic traits and are widely used in dairy and no dairy foods and beverages production. Among the functional attributes, those contributing to lower cholesterol levels are reported to be related to the action of strains belonging to the Lactobacillus acidophilus species [19]. The selection of appropriate organisms is the first step in designing and implementing bioprocesses for obtaining functional foods and beverages, as well as the availability of strain cultures in culture collections with known and validated functions [34,35].
This study aims to explore the effect of single and mixed culture of LAB strains, previously indicated as candidate probiotics, for the production of functional beverages starting with plants and organic sugarcane molasses as the raw material. The main fermentation parameters, the biochemical composition (carbohydrate, polyphenols, proteins), the volatile content and the antioxidant activity of the obtained beverages is assessed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Fermentation

The plant material used for the formulation of three fermented plant beverages is shown in Table 1. Some plants were collected from Orbata National Park Mountain (Gafsa, Tunisia) with coordinates: N 34°22′49.8″ and E 9°3′23.4″ and others were purchased from the commercial central market of Tunisia. A voucher specimen was deposited in the Laboratory of Extremophile plants, Center of Biotechnology at the Ecopark of Borj-Cédria, and was identified by Prof. Abderrazak Smaoui. The selected plant materials were harvested and mixed with 30 g of organic sugarcane molasses solubilized in 1 L of distilled water. After the adjustment of the pH at 7.8, the solution was sterilized by pasteurization (80 °C in 15 min). Three equivalent batches were prepared and fermented using the selected strains Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 and Bifidobacterium breve B632, provided by the Microbiology laboratory at the Centre of Biotechnology of Borj–Cédria.
Specifically, a single culture of each strain, L. acidophilus ATCC 43121 and B. breve B632, was used to ferment batches named FB-lc and FB-sp, respectively. In addition, a mixed culture from both the strains was prepared and used to ferment the batch named FB-lcsp. The LAB cultures were previously grown on de Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS broth, Oxoid, UK) at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, 10 mL of each culture inoculum with a concentration of 6 log cells/mL was added to each batch. After 30 days of fermentation, the three beverages were sterilized by filtration (0.2-μm filters) and preserved at +4 °C until analysis.

2.2. Fermentative Parameters

Titratable acidity (TA) was measured by titration using 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution and phenolphthalein as an indicator. The pH was detected by a digital potentiometer. The evaluation of reducing sugars was assessed using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method described by Warwick et al. [36]. Total proteins were measured using Bradford methods and the free amino acid according to the method described by Hermosín et al. [37]. Viable cell counts were made by inoculating 0.1 mL of samples, subjected to serial dilution in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), on MRS agar plates. Bacteria colonies were counted after 2 days of incubation at 30 °C.

2.3. Total Phenolic Content

According to the Folin–Ciocalteu method described by Tlili et al. [38], the total phenolic content was detected. A volume of 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 1.25 mL of Na2CO3 (7% w/v) were added to 0.125 mL of each fermented beverage. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 765 nm after incubation of the tubes for 90 min in the dark. The total polyphenols content was expressed as µg gallic acid equivalents per mL of fermented beverage (µg GAE/mL).

2.4. Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content was assessed according to the method reported by Dewanto et al. [39]. Total flavonoids, expressed as µg of quercetin equivalent per mL of fermented beverage (µg QE/mL), were estimated concerning the quercetin standard curve (concentration range: 100–750 µg/mL).

2.5. Condensed Tannins Contents

The condensed tannins were assessed according to the method reported by Sun et al. [40]. The number of condensed tannins, expressed as µg catechin equivalent per mL of fermented beverage (µg CE/mL), was measured using a standard calibration curve.

2.6. Polysaccharides Analyses

2.6.1. Extraction

The polysaccharides dissolved in the filtrate obtained from the fermented beverages were precipitated by adding absolute ethanol (four times the volume of the filtrate) and were incubated at 4 °C for 24 h. The solution was then centrifuged at 4500× g rpm for 10 min. The precipitate obtained was collected and again dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water deproteinized with 2 mL of Sevag reagent (chloroform/butanol 4: 1, v/v) according to the method described by Navarini et al. [41]. Finally, the solution obtained was dialyzed using a dialysis membrane (2 µm) against bi-distilled water.

2.6.2. Infrared Spectrum Analysis

The organic functional groups were investigated by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis, which was performed using an FTIR spectrophotometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) with a spectral range of 4000–400 cm−1 [42]. Briefly, 2 mg of each sample of polysaccharides was diluted with 200 mg spectroscopic grade potassium bromide (KBr) powder, ground and pressed into 1 mm pellets.

2.7. Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction of Volatile Compounds

The volatile compounds were analyzed by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) as previously described by Tian et al. [43]. The GC–MS headspace analysis was performed with an iron sources temperature of 240 °C and an ionization voltage of 70 eV. The mass spectrometer was operated in scan mode from m/z 50 to 350. Peak areas were determined for each compound by integrating a selected ion unique to that compound. The Kovats retention index (RI) was calculated with a homologous series of n-alkanes (C6-C28) under the same conditions applied for the sample analyses. The volatile compounds (OAV > 1) were considered to contribute to the aroma of fermented beverages [44,45].

2.8. Antioxidant Activity Determination

The antioxidant activities of different fermented beverages were determined by the following tests. The α, α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging method was performed according to Tlili et al. [38]. The reducing power was determined using the method described by Oyaizu [46]. The appearance of the blue green color was measured at 700 nm, vitamin C was used as the control. The total antioxidant capacity of each extract was estimated using the method described by Prieto et al. [47]; the absorbance was detected at 695 nm. Moreover, a 2,2-azino-bis diammonium (ABTS•+) radical scavenging assay was assessed using the method described by Hayouni et al. [48]. A total of 25 µL of the fermented beverages or the standard trolox was added to 2 mL of diluted ABTS•+ solution and the absorbance was measured at 734 nm. The scavenging ability was expressed as IC50 (µg/mL), which is defined as the concentration inhibitive at 50% of free radical scavenging.

2.9. Statistical Analyses

All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The results were reported as mean values of three replicates ± the standard deviation (sd). The differences between the average variables were considered significant at p < 0.05. XLSTAT statistical software version 2016 (Addinsoft, New York, USA) was used for data processing.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fermentation Trials

The colony counts of the selected LAB cultures, starting from the value of 6.5 log cfu/mL, increased during the 30 days of the fermentation trials. The highest value of 12 log cfu/mL was reached in the samples fermented with the mixed culture (FB-lcsp), after 20 days of fermentation. Later, the LAB population decreased, and the final values detected were 11, 10 and 8 log cfu/mL for FB-lcsp, FB-lc and FB-sp, respectively (Figure 1a). A substantial decrease of the pH and a corresponding increase of the titratable acidity was observed during the fermentation process (Figure 1b). The lowest pH value (3.7) and the highest TA value (3.4 mL NaOH 0.1N) were assessed for the FB-lcsp samples.
A decrease of total and reducing sugars was observed, probably due to the acid production by the LAB. In addition, a degradation of the total proteins and a decrease of the free amino acid content occurred (Table 2). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the fermentation, confirming the degradation of sugars and proteins by the LAB and the production of organic acids and new metabolites. It is interesting to note that the variation of all the considered parameters was higher for the trial obtained from FB-Lcsp, due to the combined effect of B. breve B632 and L. acidophilus ATCC 43121 cultures. During the fermentation process, the soluble components of proteins, carbohydrates and free sugars were readily available, and the consumption of these nutrients by LAB led to a drop in pH levels [49]. Moreover, the beverage was obtained by selecting hetero-fermentative LAB results that had a sparkling attribute, due to CO2 produced, which is desired by consumers [49].

3.2. Polyphenol, Flavanoids and Condensed Tannins Content

The polyphenols represent the major group of antioxidants of plant materials [50,51]. They include a wide variety of bioactive metabolites that contain at least one aromatic- hydroxyl group in addition to other substituents with large spectra of biological activities [45]. They are divided into different groups such as flavonoids, tannins and phenolic acids [45]. In this study, the amount of total phenolics, flavonoids and condensed tannins varied in the three beverages (Table 2). A high level of polyphenols, with values of 315.6; 289.7 and 182.5 µg GAE/mL, were observed for FB-lcsp, FB-sp and FB-lc, respectively. The highest content of flavonoids (152.1 µg RE/mL) and tannins (93.6 µg CE/mL) was found in the FB-lcsp trial. It is well known that the secondary metabolites possess a wide range of biochemical and pharmacological properties [48]. These results suggest that the mixed culture improves the extraction of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, tannins and phenolic acids. During fermentation, many changes of composition occur, leading to a modified ratio of nutrients and anti-nutrients and, therefore, the properties of the product, such as bioactivity and digestibility, are modified [52]. Lactic fermentation of plants has been shown to increase the concentration of several phenolic compounds [53]. So, the richness of our fermented plant beverages with phenolic compounds, especially FB-lcsp, could be an important starting point to explore their biological activities.

3.3. Infrared Spectrum

The infrared spectrum was used to identify the polysaccharides by detecting the stretching vibration of related groups, which allows identification of a variety of functional groups, the type of sugar and glycosides. Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra with the characteristic absorptions of the beverages before and after fermentation.
Substantial differences between the spectra were, indeed, observed, and the intensity of the peaks was higher before the fermentation (Figure 2a) and decreased in the fermented beverages (Figure 2b), indicating an almost total degradation of sugars.
In particular, the infrared spectrum analysis of the polysaccharides, recorded for wavelengths 500–4000 cm−1, showed an intense peak between (3415–3395 cm−1), representative of the vibrations of the hydroxyl groups (-OH), followed by a weak vibration of the C-H band at 2930 cm−1 [54]. Peaks with vibration bands between (3415–2930 cm−1) are unidentified organic groups (Figure 2a). The peak at 1612 cm−1 is attributed to the vibration of the C = O group in its protonated carboxylic form. The peak at 1415 cm−1 is attributed to the vibration of the COO- group in its deprotonated carboxylic form polysaccharide extract [55]. Moreover, the peaks detected at 1200–1000 cm−1 indicate that the fractions are pyranose forms of carbohydrate [56]. The peaks with vibration bands at 992 cm−1 and 942 cm−1 (Figure 2b) derive from the antisymmetric stretching of tetrahydropyran, suggesting the presence of an arrangement in the carbohydrate units [57]. The peak at 605 cm−1 is related to D-glucopyranose. Additionally, the vibration at 766 cm−1 is related to rhamnoside present in the polysaccharide. The functional groups, such as –OH, –COOH and C=O, largely found in carbohydrate in addition to anionic and cationic groups, have a good ability to counteract oxidative stress, which is expressed by excessive production of reactive oxygen species [58].

3.4. Volatile Compounds

Twenty-four volatile compounds were identified with remarkable differences between the three beverages (Table 3). Among the volatile compounds detected, some are typically produced by plants and other compounds are generated by the LAB metabolism [59]. The data showed high variations in aroma compounds. Some compounds were present only in FB-sp (1-pentanol 2-methyl, and 2-butyl acetate), and others were detected only in FB-lcsp (isoamyl alcohol, propanoic acid- 1-methylpropyl ester, α-pinene, camphene, l-phellandrene, and α-terpinene). Lactic acid, acetic acid, propyl ester, propanoic acid, propyl ester; 1,8-cineole and fenchone were also found in the three beverages. During fermentation, many changes of composition occur, leading to a modified ratio of nutrients and anti-nutrients and, therefore, the properties of the product, such as bioactivity and digestibility, are modified [60]. Among volatile compounds, alcohols are considered the principal compounds in the aromatic profile of fermented plant beverages and are a common result of the metabolism of carbohydrate and amino acids [61]. Alcohols can represent essential preservative and aromatic components in fermented plant beverages. Moreover, they can also be used as a solvent for other volatile compounds and, thus, can contribute more to the global flavor [62]. The presence of ester compounds in the fermented beverages due to the esterification of free acids with alcohol was also observed. Several volatile components in fermented plant beverages can contribute to sweet aromatic notes [63]. Our results suggest that the mixed culture of LAB could provide a suitable aroma to the fermented plants beverages.

3.5. Antioxidant Activity

The metabolization and depolymerization of phenolic compounds, correlated with increased antioxidant activity, have been observed during lactic acid fermentation [64]. In this study, the results of total antioxidant capacity (TAC) showed a similar motif to secondary metabolite contents. The TAC differed significantly among the strains used (Table 4). The three beverages showed high antioxidant activity, in particular, FB-lcsp (82.69 µg GAE/mL). Lower values were detected in samples FB-sp and FB-lc with 73.2 and 64.83 µg GAE/mL, respectively.
The DPPH scavenging activity of the fermented beverages also varied among the fermentation trials (Table 4). Samples of FB-lcsp showed the highest antioxidant activity, compared to FB-sp and FB-lc. The free radical scavenging activity ABTS•+ of each sample was also different (Table 4). This activity was higher in samples FB-lcsp (IC50; 17.4 ± 0.96 µg/mL) compared to those detected in FB-sp and FB-lc samples (IC50; 19.3 ± 1.1 and 24.6 ± 1.6 µg/mL, respectively).
Regarding the reducing power activity (FRPA) of fermented beverages, expressed as EC50 (µg/mL), all the beverages were able to lower Fe3+ to Fe2+, but the results differed among the three samples. Specifically, the highest FRPA was detected in FB-lcsp samples (Table 4). A significantly lower activity was found in FB-sp and FB-lc samples, indicating that the double culture was able to enhance and improve the antioxidant activity in the fermented beverages more than the monoculture. Indeed, it is well known that the total antioxidant capacity is essentially due to the presence of phenolic and bioactive compounds. Several studies reported that the polyphenols present in fermented beverages possess high scavenging activity against oxidative stress [65,66,67]. Recently, fungal fermentation has been used to increase the antioxidant and anti-cholesterolemic activities of food and medical compounds as well as for food preservation [68]. Moreover, many bioactive compounds, formed during seaweed fermentation, have been reported to scavenge free radicals and reactive oxygen species [69].

4. Conclusions

In this study, medicinal plants and organic sugarcane molasses were tested as raw materials to produce functional beverages via lactic fermentation. L. acidophilus ATCC 43121 and B. breve B632 were selected and used in single and multiple cultures. In particular, the strain B. breve B632 is widely described in the literature as a potential probiotic that is useful for the treatment of enteric disorders in newborns. Strains belonging to the L. acidophilus species are also valuable for functional attributes among which is the ability to lower cholesterol level.
In our work, the three fermented beverages revealed an enhanced level of polyphenols, flavonoids and tannins, especially those obtained by using the mixed culture FB-lcsp. In addition, the detection of aromatic compounds in the fermented beverages showed twenty-four interesting volatile compounds, which could give pleasant-positive aroma attributes to the flavor of the beverages. The highest antioxidant activity was observed in the beverage obtained by the mix culture strains. This innovative approach, based on lactic fermentation performed by a mixed LAB culture, can generally be used to ameliorate secondary metabolites production and extraction from plant materials.
Accordingly, the assessment of selected strains that are able to efficiently ferment medicinal plants and organic sugarcane molasses is a crucial step for designing new functional beverages with well-being effects on human health.

Author Contributions

H.G.: conceptualization, methodology, original draft; E.A.H., E.M.-R., and M.S.T. designed the study and performed the experiments. H.G., M.G., and L.D.V., contributed to drafting the manuscript, validation, data curation, visualization, writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by University of Tunis EL Manar; University of Applied Sciences, Neubrandenburg, Germany; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy; Institute of Pasteur of Tunis for the infrastructure and facilities, and Laboratory of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Center of Biotechnology (LR15CBBC06) at the Ecopark of Borj-cédria. BP-901, 2050 Hammam-Lif. Tunisia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful, and provide sincere thanks, to the honorable Vice Chancellor of the University of Applied Sciences. Neubrandenburg, Germany, and the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy for the infrastructure and facilities. This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Tunisia, Laboratory of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Center of Biotechnology (LR15CBBC06) at the Ecopark of Borj-Cédria. BP-901, 2050 Hammam-Lif. Tunisia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hussein, H.J.; Hameed, I.H.; Hadi, M.Y. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) technique for analysis of bioactive compounds of methanolic leaves extract of Lepidium sativum. Res. J. Pharm. Tech. 2017, 10, 3981–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Das, A.; Raychaudhuri, U.; Chakraborty, R. Cereal based functional food of Indian subcontinent: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gullo, M.; Zanichelli, G.; Verzelloni, E.; Lemmetti, F.; Giudici, P. Feasible acetic acid fermentations of alcoholic and sugary substrates in combined operation mode. Process. Biochem. 2016, 51, 1129–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Narvhus, J.A.; Gadaga, T.H. The role of interaction between yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in African fermented milks: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 86, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Smit, G.; Smit, B.A.; Engels, W.J.M. Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 591–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Fu, C.; Zhou, M.; Gao, B.; Wang, C.; Li, D.; Hu, Y.; Xu, N. Effects of mixed cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum in alcoholic fermentation on the physicochemical and sensory properties of citrus vinegar. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 84, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rice-Evans, C.; Miller, N.; Paganga, G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mathew, S.; Abraham, T.E. In vitro antioxidant activity and scavenging effects of Cinnamomum verum leaf extract assayed by different methodologies. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Vero, L.; Bonciani, T.; Verspohl, A.; Mezzetti, F.; Giudici, P. High-glutathione producing yeasts obtained by genetic improvement strategies: A focus on adaptive evolution approaches for novel wine strains. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. La China, S.; Zanichelli, G.; De Vero, L.; Gullo, M. Oxidative fermentations and exopolysaccharides production by acetic acid bacteria: A mini review. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 40, 1289–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bonciani, T.; De Vero, L.; Giannuzzi, E.; Verspohl, A.; Giudici, P. Qualitative and quantitative screening of the β-glucosidase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum strains isolated from refrigerated must. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kieronczyk, A.; Skeie, S.; Langsrud, T.; Yvon, M. Cooperation between Lactococcus lactis and nonstarter lactobacilli in the formation of cheese aroma from amino acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 734–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bonciani, T.; De Vero, L.; Mezzetti, F.; Fay, J.C.; Giudici, P. A multi-phase approach to select new wine yeast strains with enhanced fermentative fitness and glutathione production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 2269–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bourdichon, F.; Casaregola, S.; Farrokh, C.; Frisvad, J.C.; Gerds, M.L.; Hammes, W.P.; Harnett, J.; Huys, G.; Laulund, S.; Ouwehand, A.; et al. Food fermentations: Microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schindler, S.; Zelena, K.; Krings, U.; Bez, J.; Eisner, P.; Berger, R.G. Improvement of the aroma of pea (Pisum sativum) protein extracts by lactic acid fermentation. Food Biotechnol. 2012, 26, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harada, R.; Yuzuki, M.; Ito, K.; Shiga, K.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E. Influence of yeast and lactic acid bacterium on the constituent profile of soy sauce during fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2016, 123, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, C.J.; Schieber, A.; Gänzle, M.G. Formation of taste-active amino acids, amino acid derivatives and peptides in food fermentations—A review. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aloisio, I.; Santini, C.; Biavati, B.; Dinelli, G.; Cencič, A.; Chingwaru, W.; Mogna, L.; Di Gioia, D. Characterization of Bifidobacterium spp. strains for the treatment of enteric disorders in newborns. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 1561–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gilliland, S.E.; Nelson, C.R.; Maxwell, C. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yoon, K.Y.; Woodams, E.E.; Hang, Y.D. Production of probiotic cabbage juice by lactic acid bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1427–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Andersen, J.M.; Barrangou, R.; Abou Hachem, M.; Lahtinen, S.J.; Goh, Y.J.; Svensson, B.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Transcriptional analysis of prebiotic uptake and catabolism by Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Filho, E.; Pierini, D.; Robazza, C.; Tenenbaum, G.; Bertollo, M. Shared mental models and intra-team psychophysiological patterns: A test of the juggling paradigm. J. Sports Sci. 2017, 35, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mousavi, Z.E.; Mousavi, S.M.; Razavi, S.H.; Hadinejad, M.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Mirzapour, M. Effect of fermentation of pomegranate juice by Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus on the antioxidant activity and metabolism of sugars, organic acids and phenolic compounds. Food Biotechnol. 2013, 27, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Naczk, M.; Shahidi, F. Phenolics in cereals, fruits and vegetables: Occurrence, extraction and analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 1523–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Katina, K.; Laitila, A.; Juvonen, R.; Liukkonen, K.H.; Kariluoto, S.; Piironen, V.; Landberg, R.; Åman, P.; Poutanen, K. Bran fermentation as a means to enhance technological properties and bioactivity of rye. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Đorđević, T.M.; Šiler-Marinković, S.S.; Dimitrijević-Branković, S.I. Effect of fermentation on antioxidant properties of some cereals and pseudo cereals. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ng, C.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, Y.P.; Tzeng, W.S.; Shyu, Y.T. Lactic acid bacterial fermentation on the production of functional antioxidant herbal Anoectochilus formosanus Hayata. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bounaix, M.S.; Gabriel, V.; Morel, S.; Robert, H.; Rabier, P.; Remaud-Simeon, M.; Gabriel, B.; Fontagne-Faucher, C. Biodiversity of exopolysaccharides produced from sucrose by sourdough lactic acid bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10889–10897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martins, S.; Mussatto, S.I.; Martínez-Avila, G.; Montañez-Saenz, J.; Aguilar, C.N.; Teixeira, J.A. Bioactive phenolic compounds: Production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Torino, M.I.; Limón, R.I.; Martínez-Villaluenga, C.; Mäkinen, S.; Pihlanto, A.; Vidal-Valverde, C.; Frias, J. Antioxidant and antihypertensive properties of liquid and solid-state fermented lentils. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mishra, S.S.; Behera, P.K.; Kar, B.; Ray, R.C. Advances in probiotics, prebiotics and nutraceuticals. In Innovations in Technologies for Fermented Food and Beverage Industries; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 121–141. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bartkiene, E.; Mozuriene, E.; Lele, V.; Zokaityte, E.; Gruzauskas, R.; Jakobsone, I.; Juodeikiene, G.; Ruibys, R.; Bartkevics, V. Changes of bioactive compounds in barley industry by-products during submerged and solid-state fermentation with antimicrobial Pediococcus acidilactici strain LUHS29. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 8, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Peng, M.; Tabashsum, Z.; Anderson, M.; Truong, A.; Houser, A.K.; Padilla, J.; Akmel, A.; Bhatti, J.; Rahaman, S.O.; Biswas, D. Effectiveness of probiotics, prebiotics, and prebiotic-like components in common functional foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1908–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Vero, L.; Boniotti, M.B.; Budroni, M.; Buzzini, P.; Cassanelli, S.; Comunian, R.; Gullo, M.; Logrieco, A.F.; Mannazzu, I.; Musumeci, R.; et al. Preservation, Characterization and Exploitation of Microbial Biodiversity: The Perspective of the Italian Network of Culture Collections. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. De Vero, L.; Iosca, G.; Gullo, M.; Pulvirenti, A. Functional and Healthy Features of Conventional and Non-Conventional Sourdoughs. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Warwick, L.; Marsden, P.; Gray, G.J.; Nippard, M.R. Quinlan. Evaluation of the DNS method for analysing lignocellulosic hydrolysates. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1982, 32, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hermosín, I.; Chicón, R.M.; Cabezudo, M.D. Free amino acid composition and botanical origin of honey. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tlili, N.; Elfalleh, W.; Hannachi, H.; Yahia, Y.; Khaldi, A.; Ferchichi, A.; Nasri, N. Screening of natural antioxidants from selected medicinal plants. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013, 16, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dewanto, V.; Wu, X.; Adom, K.K.; Liu, R.H. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3010–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, B.; Ricardo-da-Silva, J.M.; Spranger, I. Critical factors of vanillin assay for catechins and proanthocyanidins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4267–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Navarini, L.; Gilli, R.; Gombac, V.; Abatangelo, A.; Bosco, M.; Toffanin, R. Polysaccharides from hot water extracts of roasted Coffea arabica beans: Isolation and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 1999, 40, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. You, L.; Gao, Q.; Feng, M.; Yang, B.; Ren, J.; Gu, L.; Cui, C.; Zhao, M. Structural characterisation of polysaccharides from Tricholoma matsutake and their antioxidant and antitumour activities. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2242–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tian, H.; Shen, Y.; Yu, H.; He, Y.; Chen, C. Effects of 4 probiotic strains in coculture with traditional starters on the flavor profile of yogurt. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 1693–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guth, H. Quantitation and sensory studies of character impact odorants of different white wine varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3027–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xi, W.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, W. Profiling taste and aroma compound metabolism during apricot fruit development and ripening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Oyaizu, M. Studies on products of browning reaction antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn. J. Nutr. Diet. 1986, 44, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Prieto, P.; Pineda, M.; Aguilar, M. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: Specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 269, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hayouni, E.A.; Abedrabba, M.; Bouix, M.; Hamdi, M. The effects of solvents and extraction method on the phenolic contents and biological activities in vitro of Tunisian Quercus coccifera L. and Juniperus phoenicea L. fruit extracts. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 1126–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sõukand, R.; Hajdari, A.; Pieroni, A.; Biró, M.; Dénes, A.; Doğan, Y.; Quave, C.L.; Kalle, R.; Reade, B.; Mustafa, B.; et al. An ethnobotanical perspective on traditional fermented plant foods and beverages in Eastern Europe. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 170, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Di Cagno, R.; Surico, R.F.; Paradiso, A.; De Angelis, M.; Salmon, J.C.; Buchin, S.; De Garaand, L.; Gobbetti, M. Effect of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria starters on health-promoting and sensory properties of tomato juices. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 128, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Di Cagno, R.; Minervini, G.; Rizzello, C.G.; De Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M. Effect of lactic acid fermentation on antioxidant, texture, color and sensory properties of red and green smoothies. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Z.; Lv, G.; Pan, H.; Fan, L.; Soccol, C.R.; Pandey, A. Production of powerful antioxidant supplements via solid-state fermentation of wheat (Triticum aestivum Linn.) by Cordyceps militaris. Food Technol. Biotech. 2012, 50, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kang, J.; Li, Z.; Wu, T.; Jensen, G.S.; Schauss, A.G.; Wu, X. Anti-oxidant capacities of flavonoid compounds isolated from acai pulp (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Food Chem. 2010, 122, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, P.; Duong, D.M.; Seyfried, N.T.; Cheng, D.; Xie, Y.; Robert, J.; Rush, J.; Hochstrasser, M.; Finley, D.; Peng, J. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 2009, 137, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Manrique, G.D.; Lajolo, F.M. FT-IR spectroscopy as a tool for measuring degree of methyl esterification in pectins isolated from ripening papaya fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 25, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karmakar, P.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Ghosh, T.; Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Padina tetrastromatica: Structural features, chemical modification and antiviral activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, Q.; Xie, Y.; Su, J.; Ye, Q.; Jia, Z. Isolation and structural characterization of a neutral polysaccharide from the stems of Dendrobium densiflorum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 50, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, J.; Li, X.; Han, T.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, M.; Xu, Y.; Harpaz, S. Effects of different dietary carbohydrate levels on growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile grouper Epinephelus akaara. Aquaculture 2016, 459, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Phillip, A.J. Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. Field Crops Res. 2005, 92, 277–290. [Google Scholar]
  60. Braga, C.M.; Zielinski, A.A.F.; da Silva, K.M.; de Souza, F.K.F.; Pietrowski, G.D.A.M.; Couto, M.; Granato, D.; Wosiacki, G.; Nogueira, A. Classification of juices and fermented beverages made from unripe, ripe and senescent apples based on the aromatic profile using chemometrics. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cheng, H. Volatile flavor compounds in yogurt: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 50, 938–950. [Google Scholar]
  62. Di Cagno, R.; Filannino, P.; Gobbetti, M. Lactic acid fermentation drives the optimal volatile flavor-aroma profile of pomegranate juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 248, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rita, R.D.; Zanda, K.; Daina, K.; Dalija, S. Composition of aroma compounds in fermented apple juice: Effect of apple variety, fermentation temperature and inoculated yeast concentration. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 1709–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Hartmann, G.; Krieg, A.M. Mechanism and function of a newly identified CpG DNA motif in human primary B cells. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 944–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hur, S.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, Y.C.; Choi, I.; Kim, G.B. Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. James, N.D.; Sydes, M.R.; Mason, M.D.; Clarke, N.W.; Anderson, J.; Dearnaley, D.P.; Dwyer, J.; Jovic, G.; Ritchie, A.W.S.; Russell, J.M.; et al. Celecoxib plus hormone therapy versus hormone therapy alone for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: First results from the STAMPEDE multiarm, multistage, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Pacifico, S.; Gallicchio, M.; Stintzing, F.C.; Fiorentino, A.; Fischer, A.; Meyer, U. Antioxidant properties and cytotoxic effects on human cancer cell lines of aqueous fermented and lipophilic quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) preparations. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 4130–4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xiao, Y.; Xing, G.; Rui, X.; Li, W.; Chen, X.; Jiang, M.; Dong, M. Enhancement of the antioxidant capacity of chickpeas by solid state fermentation with Cordyceps militaris SN-18. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 10, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Uchida, M.; Kurushima, H.; Ishihara, K.; Murata, Y.; Touhata, K.; Ishida, N.; Niwa, K.; Araki, T. Characterization of fermented seaweed sauce prepared from nori (Pyropia yezoensis). J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 123, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 11 06089 g001 550
Figure 1. LAB cells count, expressed as log of colony forming unit/mL (a), pH and titratable acidity (b) of the three different products during the lactic acid fermentation process. Results are reported as mean values of 3 replicates.
Figure 1. LAB cells count, expressed as log of colony forming unit/mL (a), pH and titratable acidity (b) of the three different products during the lactic acid fermentation process. Results are reported as mean values of 3 replicates.
Applsci 11 06089 g001
Applsci 11 06089 g002 550
Figure 2. Infrared spectrum of polysaccharides, recorded for wavelengths 500–4000 cm−1. D refers to the polysaccharides detected in not fermented beverage (a). A, B, and C refer to the polysaccharides detected in the beverages fermented with the selected cultures FB-sp, FB-lcsp, and FB-lc, respectively (b).
Figure 2. Infrared spectrum of polysaccharides, recorded for wavelengths 500–4000 cm−1. D refers to the polysaccharides detected in not fermented beverage (a). A, B, and C refer to the polysaccharides detected in the beverages fermented with the selected cultures FB-sp, FB-lcsp, and FB-lc, respectively (b).
Applsci 11 06089 g002
Table
Table 1. Plant material used for the fermentation process.
Table 1. Plant material used for the fermentation process.
PlantsBotanical FamilyWeight (g/L)Used OrganCondition
Nigella sativaRanunculaceae5seedsDry
Foeniculum VulgareApiaceae28seedsDry
Ficus indicaCactaceae90fruitsFresh
Linum usitatissimumLinaceae10seedsDry
Vitis viniferaVitaceae5seedsDry
Lavandula multifidaLamiaceae18leavesFresh
Periploca laevigataApocynaceae10rootFresh
Thymus hirtus sp. algeriensis.Lamiaceae33leavesFresh
Zingiber officinalisZingiberaceae20rootFresh
Table
Table 2. Total sugars and proteins, total phenolic compounds, flavonoids and tannins contents of obtained beverages.
Table 2. Total sugars and proteins, total phenolic compounds, flavonoids and tannins contents of obtained beverages.
Chemical ParametersBatch
FB-lcFB-spFB-lcsp
Total sugars (mg/L)23.7 ± 2.222.1 ± 3.320.3 ± 0.5
Reducing sugars (mg/L)12.5 ± 1.410.3 ± 0.89.5 ± 0.4
Total Protein (mg/L)17.8 ± 0.516.63 ±1.415.6 ± 0.3
Total phenolics (µg GAE/mL) *182.5 ± 12289.7 ± 11315.6 ± 21
Flavonoides (µg RE/mL) **95.2 ± 8.2119.3 ± 2152.1 ± 5.3
Tannins (µg CE/mL) ***87.6 ± 7.1173.1 ± 393.6 ± 9.1
FB-sp: obtained beverage fermented by Bifidobacterium breve B632. FB-lcsp: the obtained beverage fermented by a mix of both strains. FB-lc: the obtained beverage fermented by L. acidophilus ATCC 43121. * µg of gallic acid equivalents per mL of beverages. ** µg of rutin equivalent per mL of beverages. *** µg of catechin equivalent per mL of beverages. Results are expressed as the mean of 3 replicates.
Table
Table 3. Aromatic compounds identified from fermented beverage extracts of by GC–MS head space.
Table 3. Aromatic compounds identified from fermented beverage extracts of by GC–MS head space.
CompoundsRet TimeTypeFB-lcFB-spFB-lcsp
AreaArea %AreaArea %AreaArea %
acetic acid, ethyl ester3.179BVNFNF3,714,5142.9442,368,7257.472
butyraldehyde, 2-methyl-3.631BB3,166,9222.3723,165,8402.503,259,7810.574
2-amino-1,3-propanediol4.085BVNFNF3,512,1972.7824,311,4054.287
n-propyl acetate4.282PV2,752,3322.0623,065,1892.42112,465,98219.83
1-butanol, 3-methyl-, formate4.676BV2,205,1041.6522,365,9181.878,500,1431.499
propanoic acid4.975PV1,216,0920.9111,305,6071.039,172,5631.617
propanoic acid, propyl ester5.857PV724,8500.543832,9160.665,365,5180.946
2-oxopentanedioic acid5.996BV1,244,0740.9322,245,9101.78NFNF
lactic acid7.841BV566,4680.4249,635,3167.622,134,7300.376
alpha-pinene8.138VV480,3500.359526,8130.4212,589,3652.220
camphene8.414VB449,6700.336563,4890.456,925,6601.221
α-phellandrene9.404PVNFNF448,9230.0013,479,0752.377
alpha-terpinene9.633BV841,2090.6301,935,8720.369,501,0401.676
p-cimene9.790VB28,89,3272.1642,889,3270.0018,702,9873.298
D-limonene9.879BVNFNF125,6831.5310,850,6131.914
eucalyptol9.950VB82,174,28361.56945,227,3592.298,296,7591.463
gamma-terpinene10.522PV887,8530.665889,8530.102,486,8380.438
terpinolene11.298VV2,302,6291.7252,302,62935.77159,646,37028.158
fenchone11.300VVNFNFNF0.7029,477,2775.199
linalol11.554BB604,9760.45320,304,3841.8236,435,1206.426
camphor12.844BB12,301,0159.21612,303,0159.738,640,4721.523
endo-borneol13.341PV3,391,5282.5414,485,72816.0628,204,2674.975
terpinen-4-ol13.556VB15,049,23111.2753,263,9809.7314,150,7052.496
α-terpineol13.885VB218,3070.1631,318,3973.55NFNF
FB-sp: beverage fermented by Bifidobacterium breve B632. FB-lcsp: beverage fermented by a mix of both strains. FB-lc: beverage fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121. NF: not found. BV: baseline and valley points (start at a baseline point, end at a dropline from a valley point). VB: Valley dropline and baseline points. PV: penetration point and valley point. BB: start at a baseline point, end at a dropline baseline point. VV: start and dropline at a valley point.
Table
Table 4. Total antioxidant capacity and the free radical scavenging activity of DPPH, ABTS and the reducing power essay of the three fermented beverages.
Table 4. Total antioxidant capacity and the free radical scavenging activity of DPPH, ABTS and the reducing power essay of the three fermented beverages.
Antioxidant ActivityFB-lcFB-spFB-lcspBHTTroloxVitamin C
Total antioxidant capacity (µg EGA/mL)64.8 ± 0.673.2 ± 2.482.6 ± 6.3
DPPH (µg/mL)17.8 ± 1.616.5 ± 3.113.4 ± 8.311.8 ± 2.6
ABTS (µg/mL sample)24.6 ± 1.619.3 ± 1.117.4 ± 0.96 10.2 ± 1.5
Reducing power (µg/mL)55.9 ± 4.848.1 ± 4.136.1 ± 3.1 12.5 ± 2
The scavenging ability was expressed as IC50 (µg/mL). The reducing power activity (FRPA) was expressed as EC50 (µg/mL). Results are expressed as mean of 3 replicates ± standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gadhoumi, H.; Gullo, M.; De Vero, L.; Martinez-Rojas, E.; Saidani Tounsi, M.; Hayouni, E.A. Design of a New Fermented Beverage from Medicinal Plants and Organic Sugarcane Molasses via Lactic Fermentation. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136089

AMA Style

Gadhoumi H, Gullo M, De Vero L, Martinez-Rojas E, Saidani Tounsi M, Hayouni EA. Design of a New Fermented Beverage from Medicinal Plants and Organic Sugarcane Molasses via Lactic Fermentation. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(13):6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gadhoumi, Hamza, Maria Gullo, Luciana De Vero, Enriqueta Martinez-Rojas, Moufida Saidani Tounsi, and El Akrem Hayouni. 2021. "Design of a New Fermented Beverage from Medicinal Plants and Organic Sugarcane Molasses via Lactic Fermentation" Applied Sciences 11, no. 13: 6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136089

APA Style

Gadhoumi, H., Gullo, M., De Vero, L., Martinez-Rojas, E., Saidani Tounsi, M., & Hayouni, E. A. (2021). Design of a New Fermented Beverage from Medicinal Plants and Organic Sugarcane Molasses via Lactic Fermentation. Applied Sciences, 11(13), 6089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop