Next Article in Journal
Digital (R)Evolution: Open-Source Softwares for Orthodontics
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Design Parameters on Compressive and Split Tensile Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete with Recycled Aggregate: An Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Minimum Representative Human Body Model Size Determination for Link Budget Calculation in Implanted Medical Devices

1
TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
2
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, TECNUN, University of Navarra, Mikeletegi Pasealekua 48, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
3
Institute for Communication Systems/5GIC/6GIC, School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
4
School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd, Bethnal Green, London E1 4NS, UK
5
CEIT, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Manuel Lardizabal 13, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(13), 6032; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136032
Submission received: 5 May 2021 / Revised: 18 June 2021 / Accepted: 26 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021

Abstract

In this work, the optimum homogeneous phantom size for an equivalent whole-body electromagnetic (EM) modeling is calculated. This will enable the simple characterization of plane wave EM attenuation and far-field link budgets in Active Medical Implant (AMI) applications in the core region of the body for Industrial, Scientific, Medical and MedRadio frequency bands. A computational analysis is done to determine the optimum size in which a minimum phantom size reliably represents a whole-body situation for the corresponding frequency of operation, saving computer and laboratory resources. After the definition of a converge criterion, the computed minimum phantom size for subcutaneous applications, 0–10 mm insertion depth, is 355 × 160 × 255 mm3 for 402 MHz and 868 MHz and a cube with a side of 100 mm and 50 mm for 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz, respectively. For deep AMI applications, 10–50 mm insertion depth, the dimensions are 355 × 260 × 255 mm3 for 402 MHz and 868 MHz, and a cube with a side of 200 mm and 150 mm for 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz, respectively. A significant reduction in both computational and manufacturing resources for phantom development is thereby achieved. The verification of the model is performed by field measurements in phantoms made by aqueous solutions with sugar.
Keywords: electromagnetic propagation in absorbing media; biomedical applications of electromagnetic radiation; biomedical computing; biomedical measurements; implantable biomedical devices electromagnetic propagation in absorbing media; biomedical applications of electromagnetic radiation; biomedical computing; biomedical measurements; implantable biomedical devices

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ortego-Isasa, I.; Rezola, A.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Valderas, D. Minimum Representative Human Body Model Size Determination for Link Budget Calculation in Implanted Medical Devices. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6032. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136032

AMA Style

Ortego-Isasa I, Rezola A, Gao Y, Chen X, Valderas D. Minimum Representative Human Body Model Size Determination for Link Budget Calculation in Implanted Medical Devices. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(13):6032. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ortego-Isasa, Iñaki, Ainhoa Rezola, Yue Gao, Xiaodong Chen, and Daniel Valderas. 2021. "Minimum Representative Human Body Model Size Determination for Link Budget Calculation in Implanted Medical Devices" Applied Sciences 11, no. 13: 6032. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136032

APA Style

Ortego-Isasa, I., Rezola, A., Gao, Y., Chen, X., & Valderas, D. (2021). Minimum Representative Human Body Model Size Determination for Link Budget Calculation in Implanted Medical Devices. Applied Sciences, 11(13), 6032. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop