Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Comparison of Root Surface Treatment Effect between Root Scaling with Ultrasonic Inserts and Gracey Curette and Polishing with Different Cleaning Pastes
Next Article in Special Issue
A Simple Water Retention Model Based on Grain Size Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Characterization of the Functional and Antioxidant Activity of Cactus Flowers from Hidalgo, Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Significance of Hydrophobicity for the Water Retention Properties of Sand and Coal

Priority Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(13), 5966; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135966
Submission received: 5 June 2021 / Revised: 22 June 2021 / Accepted: 23 June 2021 / Published: 26 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unsaturated Soils: Testing and Modelling)

Abstract

For mine wastes such as coal tailings, management of these materials requires complex geotechnical engineering that uses many soil properties, such as water retention. However, coal itself is chemically heterogeneous and often appears to be partially hydrophobic, which affects its water retention properties. This study aims to outline how hydrophobic soil particles and coal alter water retention curves compared to hydrophilic materials. The study involves four materials: sand, hydrophobized sand, crushed rock and crushed coal. Mixtures of sand with different proportions of hydrophobic particles had their water retention curves measured and compared, with the only variable being the particle surface characteristics. The rock and coal were separated into different particle size fractions and had their water retention curves measured and compared, with the only variable being particle hydrophobicity. A clear trend was observed for the sand mixtures: the degree of saturation at any suction was reduced when increasing the hydrophobicity of the material. This trend indicates the fundamental water retention behavior expected for soils more hydrophobic than is typical, which was not clearly demonstrated in previous studies. However, a similar trend was not seen when comparing the rock and otherwise identical hydrophobic coal samples, which actually appeared hydrophilic in terms of water retention. ESEM imaging shows a dual hydrophilic and hydrophobic behavior for coal which may explain the result. However, further research is required to understand the discrepancy, which appears to be caused by an unknown coal–water phenomena.
Keywords: hydrophobicity; soil water retention; contact angle; coal; ESEM hydrophobicity; soil water retention; contact angle; coal; ESEM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vidler, A.; Buzzi, O.; Fityus, S. The Significance of Hydrophobicity for the Water Retention Properties of Sand and Coal. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135966

AMA Style

Vidler A, Buzzi O, Fityus S. The Significance of Hydrophobicity for the Water Retention Properties of Sand and Coal. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(13):5966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135966

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vidler, Andrew, Olivier Buzzi, and Stephen Fityus. 2021. "The Significance of Hydrophobicity for the Water Retention Properties of Sand and Coal" Applied Sciences 11, no. 13: 5966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135966

APA Style

Vidler, A., Buzzi, O., & Fityus, S. (2021). The Significance of Hydrophobicity for the Water Retention Properties of Sand and Coal. Applied Sciences, 11(13), 5966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135966

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop