Next Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Design Optimization of the Reinforced Composite Roof in a Solar Vehicle
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Melting Kinetics of Sugar-Reduced Silver Ear Mushroom Ice Cream under Various Additive Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/app10082663
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Crystal Stabilities of ε-CL-20 via Core-Shell Structured Energetic Composites

by
Honglei Zhang
1,
Qingjie Jiao
1,
Wanjun Zhao
1,
Xueyong Guo
1,*,
Dayong Li
2 and
Xiaole Sun
1
1
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2
China North Chemical Research Academy Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100089, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(8), 2663; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082663
Submission received: 5 March 2020 / Revised: 29 March 2020 / Accepted: 10 April 2020 / Published: 12 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical and Molecular Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Featured Application

We aimed to obtain a dense ε-CL-20/polydopamine core-shell structure by chemical bionic technology that can effectively inhibit the solid–solid phase transition existing for CL-20 crystals and greatly enhance the thermal safety. Obtained well-coated CL-20 particles could be employed in high-energy insensitive polymer bonded explosives (PBX), thus promoting the development of weapons and equipment.

Abstract

2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) is a widely used high-energy explosive for the application of energetic materials. However, the phase transformation from ε-CL-20 to γ-CL-20 restrains its further application in polymer bonded explosives (PBXs) and propellants. To inhibit the phase transition of CL-20, dopamine was first used in an efficient and facile method of in situ polymerization to passivate CL-20 crystals. The core-shell microcapsule particles were obtained, and the morphological characterization demonstrates the formation of a dense core-shell structure. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) test results show that the compact and dense coating delays the ε-CL-20 crystal transformation temperature by about 30 °C, which enhances thermal stability. In addition, with the coating via polymers, the friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20 crystals decreases significantly. The findings indicate a successful application of dopamine chemistry in high-energy explosives, which provides an attractive method to modify the properties of CL-20 crystals.

1. Introduction

2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) is one of the most promising explosives and propellant formulations that was synthesized first by the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, in 1987 with higher detonation performance than conventional nitramine explosives including cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX) and cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine (HMX) [1,2]. LX-19 (ε-CL-20 95.2%, wax 4.8%) is more powerful relative to the presently widely used LX-14 formulation consisting of 95.5% HMX and 4.5% wax, even though LX-19 is slightly more sensitive compared with LX-14 [3]. Five polymorphic phases exist for CL-20: ε, β, α, and γ phases at ambient temperature, and ζ phase at high pressure [4]. The energy density of ε-CL-20 is the highest with the lowest sensitivity [5], and under certain conditions, such as a certain thermal stimulus or mechanical shock, ε-CL-20 transfers into other phases [6]. The solid–solid phase transition of CL-20 is the transition of ε into γ phase under thermal stimulation. The rapid phase transition described above can lead to an expansion in volume, causing stress cracking. The resulting defects may induce hot spots and the sensitization of explosives to deflagration. The internal defect structure of explosive crystals adversely influences the mechanical and thermal sensitivity of polymer bonded explosives (PBX) [7,8]. Therefore, the phase transition of CL-20 must be investigated.
In recent years, the research on crystal phase transition of ε-CL-20 has mainly focused on two aspects: (1) the phase transition of ε-CL-20 during the recrystallization in a liquid-phase environment. Crystallization parameters, such as temperature, solvents, agitation rate, and the methods of adding solvents, can significantly affect the polymorphs and transition of ε-CL-20 [9,10,11,12,13,14]. (2) Additives are incorporated via conventional coating or physical mixing to investigate the phase transformation of ε-CL-20 crystals. The additives usually have a high dipole moment or slightly dissolve CL-20, which can easily polarize ε-CL-20, thus promoting its transition to γ-CL-20 [15,16]. Neutral polymers, such as glycidyl azide polymer (GAP), isocyanate desmodur (N100), ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), and butadiene rubber (BR), inhibit the crystal change of CL-20 [6,17].
Despite the conventional coating method improving the coverage of the explosive particle surface to a certain extent, this method cannot completely remove the defects of the particle surface coating [10,11,12]. Thus, new materials must be found with strong adhesion for modifying energetic crystal particles. Recently, mussel coatings inspired by dopamine in situ polymerization attracted interest and are usually used to passivate large amounts of substrates such as glass, metals, polymers, and nano-carbon materials [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Dopamine chemistry was reported for crystal modification of energetic materials, such as HMX, RDX, and 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TATB) [11,26,27,28]. However, few studies have reported the application of dopamine chemistry technology for CL-20 solid–solid phase transition studies.
In this study, a convenient in-situ polymerization method was applied to prepare the core-shell ε-CL-20/polydopamine (ε-CL-20/PDA) microparticles. The obtained core-shell structure significantly improves the thermal stability, phase transition stability, and safety of ε-CL-20 crystal. Four kinds of dopamine materials were selected and employed for coating experiments. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to confirm the firmness and compactness of the core-shell structure. The solid–solid crystal transformation temperature of ε-CL-20 and passivated crystals, which has been little studied before, was measured via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and in situ X-ray diffraction (in situ XRD).

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals

ε-CL-20 was obtained from Liaoning Qingyang Special Chemical Co., Ltd. (Liaoyang, China), which was synthesized and purified using the solvent/anti-solvent method. Four dopamine series (dopamine, levodopa, norepinephrine, and 6-hydroxydopamine) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Their molecular structures are shown in Figure 1. 2-amino-2-hydroxymethylpropane-1,3-diol (Tris) was provided by Shanghai Aladdin Chemical Ltd., Shanghai, China.

2.2. Sample Preparations

The core-shell structure ε-CL-20/PDA particles were prepared as follows: 50 mg PDA was dissolved in 300 mL Tris-HCl (10 mM, pH 8.5) and stirred for 10 min. We added 100 g ε-CL-20 crystals to this solution, followed by stirring at 25 °C for 24 h. Twelve hours after PDA coating, the color of ε-CL-20/PDA became dark brown, different from pristine white ε-CL-20, revealing the completeness of the PDA self-polymerization. The composite particles were filtered from the suspension and washed with ethanol several times, followed by drying at 50 °C to obtain the ε-CL-20/PDA particles. Figure 2 illustrates the preparation method of the core-shell structure. The preparation methods of the other three core-shell structures (ε-CL-20/poly-L-dopamine (PLD), ε-CL-20/poly-norepinephrine (PNE), and ε-CL-20/poly-6-hydroxydopamine (POHDA)) were similar to the above method.

2.3. Characterization Method

The microstructure and the electronic binding energy of the elements of raw ε-CL-20, ε-CL-20/PDA, ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA were characterized via SEM and XPS. DSC (STA449C, Netzsch, Selb, Germany) and in situ XRD (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used to evaluate the crystal transformation. In a typical DSC, ~5 mg of sample was heated from ambient temperature to 450 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C/min in an Ar atmosphere. In situ XRD was conducted on a Bruker D8 Advance (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, 40 kV, and 40 mA), scanning over the 2θ range from 5° to 50° at a rate of 0.01°/0.1 s. To determine the crystalline phase of compositions, the obtained spectra data were refined using the Rietveld method [29]. The mechanical sensitivity was characterized via a WL-1 type impact sensitivity instrument and a WM-1 type friction sensitivity instrument [30]. The impact sensitivity was tested with a 2 kg drop weight, and the sample mass was 30 mg. The impact sensitivity of each test sample is expressed by the drop height of 50% explosion probability (H50). For the impact sensitivity test, a 20 mg sample was weighed for each test at the relative pressure of 2.54 MPa. The pendulum weight was 1.5 kg and the pendulum angle was 80°. The fraction sensitivity of each test sample is expressed by explosion probability (P).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Characteristics

The polymer content in the composites was tested by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Table 1 shows that the polymers concentrations for ε-CL-20/PDA, ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA composites were 1.6, 0.7, 1.3, and 1.4 wt.%, respectively. The morphologies of raw ε-CL-20 and four core-shell structures (ε-CL-20/PDA, ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA) are shown in Figure 3. For the raw ε-CL-20 particles prepared via a recrystallization process, the crystal shape was a more regular polyhedron (Figure 3f). The shape of the passivated ε-CL-20 crystal particles remains polyhedral. To compare the surfaces of raw ε-CL-20 and core-shell structures, SEM images with high magnification are shown in Figure 3a–e. The white CL-20 crystals gradually turned brown-black with progressing polymerization. After 24 h of reaction, the color of the crystal particles did not change, indicating the polymerization finished. As shown in Figure 3a–d, four polymers in a dense protective film formed on the surface of the ε-CL-20 particles. In comparison with the protuberance and cracks appearing on the surface of ε-CL-20 crystals (Figure 3e) caused by the electron beams during the SEM test, similar phenomena were significantly improved in the well-coated samples (Figure 3a–d). This reveals that even though the raw explosive crystals are extremely sensitive to electron beams, dense polymer films coated on the crystals could effectively improve the resistance to electron beams [25].
The change in the electronic binding energy of the elements on the surface of ε-CL-20 determined by the XPS test provided valuable insights into the costing effectiveness. The C1s, O1s, and N1s spectra for ε-CL-20, PDA, and ε-CL-20/PDA samples are shown in Figure 4. The spectrum data of the other three groups (ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA samples) are shown in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7. The percent contribution of the C1s, O1s, and N1s atom to ε-CL-20, PDA, and ε-CL-20/PDA samples were integrated and are presented in Table 2. The coating effect of explosive particles can be accessed via analyzing the N/C ratio on the particle surface [25]. The N/C ratio on the surfaces of PDA, PLD, PNE, and POHDA are 0.11, 0.13, 0.12, and 0.12, respectively. The N/C atomic ratio of CL-20 (1.06) is relatively higher, which is due to the existence of various –NO2 and –NH2 groups. After being coated with PDA, PLD, PNE, or POHDA, the N/C ratio decreased from 1.06 to 0.51, 0.70, 0.63, and 0.55, respectively, which indicated successful surface coating.
From the spectrum of PDA in Figure 4, four fitted C1s peaks centered at 284.5, 285.8, 287.9, and 291.2 eV are attributed to C–H or C–C, C–O, or C–N, C=O, and π–π* shake up. Three peak spectra of N1s appeared, corresponding to CN=C, C–NH–C, and C–NH2 bonds, respectively, and their binding energies were 398.2, 399.5, and 401.3 eV, respectively. The O1s spectrum was fitted to two peaks at 530.8 and 532.7 eV, which were C=O and C–OH, respectively. The characteristic peak of C=O appeared in both the C1s spectrum and the O1s spectrum, indicating that during the dopamine polymerization process, the catechol group of dopamine was oxidized to a quinone group. The emerged peaks at 398.2 and 530.8 eV from N1s and O1s spectra could be attributed to C–N=C and C=O for PDA, respectively [31].

3.2. Thermal Properties of ε-CL-20 Composite Structures

The thermal stability of energetic materials is an important aspect of the material properties. DSC was employed to explore the thermal behavior of ε-CL-20 crystals and the coated samples (Figure 8). As shown in the DSC curve of ε-CL-20, the endothermic and exothermic peaks appeared at 156.3 and 328.5 °C, respectively, which were attributed to the transition from ε into γ phase and the thermal decomposition of CL-20. The temperature of the thermal decomposition modified by PDA is basically the same as that of the original explosive crystal [32].
According to the analysis in Table 3, the phase transition temperature of ε-CL-20 crystal coated by self-oxidizing polymerization increased considerably. In detail, the peak temperatures of ε-CL-20/PDA, ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA samples increased from 156.3 to 179.0, 165.3, 172.5, and 176.0 °C, respectively. The SEM images shown in Figure 3 indicate that the dense coating of PDA on each crystal may be the main reason that the small amount of PDA could inhibit the phase change significantly. Compared with the samples prepared via mechanical mixing, the initial crystal transformation temperature of ε-CL-20 after PDA self-oxidative polymerization coating increased by about 30 °C, which indicates a markedly improved thermal safety of ε-CL-20 during application [25].

3.3. Phase Transition Stability of ε-CL-20 Composite Structures

Figure 9 shows the standard spectra of four polymorphs of CL-20 and the X-ray spectra of ε-CL-20 at various temperatures. In the diffraction angle (2θ) ranging from 12° to 14°, the two crystal forms of CL-20 are significantly different. In comparison with the peaks at 12.8° and 13.8° of ε-CL-20, the new peaks appear at 12.9°, 13.3°, and 14.2° for γ-CL-20 [6]. According to Section 2.2, four kinds of CL-20 samples coated with different polymers were prepared, and the phase transition behavior of CL-20 in the composite system was characterized by in situ XRD [4]. Figure 10 shows the X-ray patterns of ε-CL-20/PDA, ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA at different temperatures. The phase composition of the ε-CL-20 crystals was calculated via the Rietveld refinement method through the Topas Academy procedure, which is standardless X-ray diffraction [29]. The refinement fit test results are presented in Figure 11.
Figure 9 and Figure 10 show that with increasing sample temperature, the characteristic peak of ε-CL-20 gradually weakened, and the characteristic peak of γ-CL-20 appeared and increased, indicating more ε-CL-20 changed to γ-CL-20. The XRD patterns did not change when the temperature decreased from 190 to 30 °C, which demonstrated an irreversible process for the crystal form change in this situation. As shown in Figure 11, the initial crystal transformation temperatures of ε-CL-20, ε-CL-20/PDA, ε-CL-20/PLD, ε-CL-20/PNE, and ε-CL-20/POHDA are 145, 175, 160, 160, and 170, °C, respectively. With the temperature increasing to 190 °C, we found that almost all ε-CL-20 of ε-CL-20, ε-CL-20/PLD, and ε-CL-20/PNE converted to γ-CL-20. However, the γ-CL-20 contents of ε-CL-20/PDA and ε-CL-20/POHDA were 37.9% and 73.3%, which indicated that PDA and POHDA could inhibit the CL-20 crystal transformation well.
Different from the crystallization from a solution, no polymorphic transition occurs when the medium is a solid matrix with a solvent. The activation energy for forming a new crystal phase in a solid environment is much higher than in a liquid environment, leading to a more complicated polymorphic transformation process in the solid matrix. The intense interfacial interaction between the PDA and the explosive crystal results in the high polycrystalline transition temperature. The polymorphic conversion could be reduced greatly via PDA coating, especially when the nucleation processes is the rate-limiting step [33].

3.4. Mechanical Sensitivity of ε-CL-20 Composite Structures

The mechanical sensitivity of explosive crystals is a key parameter for characterizing the safety of explosives. ε-CL-20 particles have lower mechanical sensitivity, which is beneficial for their application in weapons and equipment. According to Table 4, the friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20 crystals coated with PDA, PLD, PNE, and POHDA with shell-core structure decreased greatly from 96% to 48%, 60%, 60%, and 56%, respectively. Among these composites, the friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20/PDA was the lowest. The significant decrease in friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20 crystals via coating may be attributed to the stronger interfacial interaction between ε-CL-20 crystals and polymers. However, the shell-core structure prepared by self-polymerization had no significant effect on reducing the impact sensitivity of ε-CL-20. The irregular shape and defects of the crystal are the main reasons for its high impact sensitivity [34]; this correspond to the results in Figure 3—the shape of ε-CL-20 does not change considerably after the self-polymerizing coating. We proved that a uniform and compact passivating shell was formed by PDA on the CL-20 crystals, which could help optimize the properties of energetic crystals for applications in special service environments, which is worth further research.

4. Conclusions

The dopamine surface chemistry was found to be a highly efficient and concise method for passivating energetic crystals, resulting in a stable core-shell CL-20/PDA structure. The structural characterization confirmed the morphology and formation mechanism of the PDA series, which is helpful for exploring the structural evolution and deposition mechanism of PDA on the ε-CL-20 surface. The experimental results showed that the compact and dense coating increases the ε-CL-20 crystal transformation temperature by about 30 °C and significantly improves the thermal stability of ε-CL-20 crystals, which is important for ensuring the safety of energetic materials. With the coating via polymers, the friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20 crystals decreased significantly. Our findings provide new opportunities for the surface modification of high-energy explosive crystals and the preparation of energetic materials with high-level performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.J. and X.G.; Formal analysis, W.Z.; Supervision, X.S. and D.L.; Writing—original draft, H.Z.; Writing—review & editing, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1730108).

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the support from State Key Laboratory of Explosive Science.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nielsen, A.T. Caged Polynitramine Compound. U.S. Patent No. 5,693,794, 2 December 1997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nielsen, A.T. Synthesis of Polynitropolyaza Caged Nitramines; Chemical Propulsion Information Agency: Columbia, MD, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  3. Simpson, R.L.; Urtiew, P.A.; Ornellas, D.L.; Moody, G.L.; Scribner, K.F.J.; Hoffman, D.M. CL-20 performance exceeds that of HMX and its sensitivity is moderate. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 1997, 22, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, P.; Xu, J.J.; Guo, X.Y.; Jiao, Q.J.; Zhang, J.Y. Effect of addictives on polymorphic transition of epsilon-CL-20 in castable systems. J. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 117, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ghosh, M.; Venkatesan, V.; Mandave, S.; Banerjee, S.; Sikder, N.; Sikder, A.K.; Bhattacharya, B. Probing Crystal Growth of epsilon- and alpha-CL-20 Polymorphs via Metastable Phase Transition Using Microscopy and Vibrational Spectroscopy. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 5053–5063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, C.; Wang, D.; Gao, B.; Wang, J.; Luo, B.; Yang, G.; Nie, F. Solid–solid phase transition study of ε-CL-20/binder composites. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gump, J.C.; Peiris, S.M. Phase transitions and isothermal equations of state of epsilon hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20). J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 083509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, Q.; Yan, G.; Sun, G.; Huang, C.; Xie, L.; Chen, B.; Huang, M.; Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J. Thermally Induced Damage in Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. 2013, 10, 359–369. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gavezzotti, A.; Simonetta, M. Crystal-Chemistry in Organic-Solids. Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jung, J.W.; Kim, K.J. Effect of Supersaturation on the Morphology of Coated Surface in Coating by Solution Crystallization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 3475–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Z.J.; Ding, L.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.G.; Nie, F.D.; Huang, F.L. Fabrication of RDX, HMX and CL-20 based microcapsules via in situ polymerization of melamine-formaldehyde resins with reduced sensitivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 268, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, Z.G.; Gao, B.; Wu, P.; Shi, J.C.; Qiao, Z.Q.; Yang, Z.J.; Yang, G.C.; Huang, B.; Nie, F.D. Facile, continuous and large-scale production of core-shell HMX@TATB composites with superior mechanical properties by a spray-drying process. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 21042–21049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Levitas, V.I.; Henson, B.F.; Smilowitz, L.B.; Asay, B.W. Solid–solid phase transformation via virtual melting significantly below the melting temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 235702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, J.Q.; Ballmer, S.G.; Gillis, E.P.; Fujii, S.; Schmidt, M.J.; Palazzolo, A.M.E.; Lehmann, J.W.; Morehouse, G.F.; Burke, M.D. Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process. Science 2015, 347, 1221–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Guo, X.Y.; Zhang, P.; Xu, J.J.; Wang, Z.H.; Jiao, Q.J. Research on the Mechanism and Kinetics of Polymorphic Transitions of epsilon-CL-20 in Composite Systems. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. 2015, 12, 689–702. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, Y.; Li, S.C.; Wang, Z.S.; Xu, J.J.; Sun, J.; Huang, H. Thermally Induced Polymorphic Transformation of Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (HNIW) Investigated by in-situ X-ray Powder Diffraction. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. 2016, 13, 1023–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.-Y.; Guo, X.-Y.; Jiao, Q.-J.; Zhang, P. Phase transitions of epsilon-HNIW in compound systems. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 055016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhu, Q.; Xiao, C.; Li, S.B.; Luo, G. Bioinspired Fabrication of Insensitive HMX Particles with Polydopamine Coating. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 2016, 41, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shang, K.; Song, S.Y.; Cheng, Y.P.; Guo, L.L.; Pei, Y.X.; Lv, X.M.; Aastrup, T.; Pei, Z.C. Fabrication of Carbohydrate Chips Based on Polydopamine for Real-Time Determination of Carbohydrate-Lectin Interactions by QCM Biosensor. Polymers 2018, 10, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Postma, A.; Yan, Y.; Wang, Y.J.; Zelikin, A.N.; Tjipto, E.; Caruso, F. Self-Polymerization of Dopamine as a Versatile and Robust Technique to Prepare Polymer Capsules. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 3042–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nie, C.X.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, C.; Ma, L.; Deng, J.; Wang, L.R.; Zhao, C.S. Bioinspired and biocompatible carbon nanotube-Ag nanohybrid coatings for robust antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater. 2017, 51, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nie, C.X.; Cheng, C.; Peng, Z.H.; Ma, L.; He, C.; Xia, Y.; Zhao, C.S. Mussel-inspired coatings on Ag nanoparticle-conjugated carbon nanotubes: Bactericidal activity and mammal cell toxicity. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, J.H.; Zhu, L.P.; Zhu, L.J.; Zhu, B.K.; Xu, Y.Y. Surface Characteristics of a Self-Polymerized Dopamine Coating Deposited on Hydrophobic Polymer Films. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14180–14187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. He, G.S.; Yang, Z.J.; Pan, L.P.; Zhang, J.H.; Liu, S.J.; Yan, Q.L. Bioinspired interfacial reinforcement of polymer based energetic composites with a high loading of solid explosive crystals. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 13499–13510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gong, F.Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Ding, L.; Yang, Z.J.; Liu, X.B. Mussel-inspired coating of energetic crystals: A compact core-shell structure with highly enhanced thermal stability. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 309, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, C.M.; Gong, F.Y.; Yang, Z.J.; Pan, L.P.; Liu, S.J.; Li, J.; Guo, S.Y. Bio-inspired fabrication of core@shell structured TATB/polydopamine microparticles via in situ polymerization with tunable mechanical properties. Polym. Test. 2018, 68, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.B.; Yang, Z.J.; Zhang, J.H.; Pan, L.P.; Ding, L.; Tian, X.; Zheng, X.; Gong, F.Y. Fabrication and characterization of HMX@TPEE energetic microspheres with reduced sensitivity and superior toughness properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 142, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, M.; Huang, M.; Kang, B.; Wen, M.P.; Li, H.Z.; Xu, R. Quality evaluation of RDX crystalline particles by confined quasi-static compression method. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 2007, 32, 401–405. [Google Scholar]
  29. Young, R.A. The Rietveld Method; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  30. National Military Standard of China. Experimental Methods of Sensitivity and Safety; GJB/772A-97; National Defense Science Technology and Industry Comission Press: Beijing, China, 1997. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Zangmeister, R.A.; Morris, T.A.; Tarlov, M.J. Characterization of Polydopamine Thin Films Deposited at Short Times by Autoxidation of Dopamine. Langmuir 2013, 29, 8619–8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, C.M.; Gong, F.Y.; Yang, Z.J.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.B.; Zeng, C.C.; Li, J.; Guo, S.Y. Core-Shell Structured HMX@Polydopamine Energetic Microspheres: Synergistically Enhanced Mechanical, Thermal, and Safety Performances. Polymers 2019, 11, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gong, F.Y.; Yang, Z.J.; Qjan, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Ding, L.; Lin, C.M.; Zeng, C.C.; Yan, Q.L. Kinetics for Inhibited Polymorphic Transition of HMX Crystal after Strong Surface Confinement. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 11011–11019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dartyge, B.F. Influence of crystal defects on sensitivity of explosives. In Proceedings of the 10th International Detonation Symposium, Boston, MA, USA, 12–16 June 1993; p. 816. [Google Scholar]
Applsci 10 02663 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecule structures of (a) dopamine, (b) levodopa, (c) norepinephrine, and (d) 6-hydroxydopamine.
Figure 1. Molecule structures of (a) dopamine, (b) levodopa, (c) norepinephrine, and (d) 6-hydroxydopamine.
Applsci 10 02663 g001
Applsci 10 02663 g002 550
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of the preparation method of the core-shell structure.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of the preparation method of the core-shell structure.
Applsci 10 02663 g002
Applsci 10 02663 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images for (a) epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20)/polydopamine (PDA), (b) ε-CL-20/poly-L-dopamine (PLD), (c) ε-CL-20/poly-norepinephrine (PNE), (d) ε-CL-20/poly-6-hydroxydopamine (POHDA), and (e,f) ε-CL-20.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images for (a) epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20)/polydopamine (PDA), (b) ε-CL-20/poly-L-dopamine (PLD), (c) ε-CL-20/poly-norepinephrine (PNE), (d) ε-CL-20/poly-6-hydroxydopamine (POHDA), and (e,f) ε-CL-20.
Applsci 10 02663 g003
Applsci 10 02663 g004 550
Figure 4. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra for ε-CL-20, PDA, and ε-CL-20/PDA composites.
Figure 4. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra for ε-CL-20, PDA, and ε-CL-20/PDA composites.
Applsci 10 02663 g004
Applsci 10 02663 g005 550
Figure 5. XPS spectra for ε-CL-20, PLD, and ε-CL-20/PLD core-shell composites.
Figure 5. XPS spectra for ε-CL-20, PLD, and ε-CL-20/PLD core-shell composites.
Applsci 10 02663 g005
Applsci 10 02663 g006 550
Figure 6. XPS spectra for ε-CL-20, PNE, and ε-CL-20/PNE core-shell composites.
Figure 6. XPS spectra for ε-CL-20, PNE, and ε-CL-20/PNE core-shell composites.
Applsci 10 02663 g006
Applsci 10 02663 g007 550
Figure 7. XPS spectra for ε-CL-20, POHDA, and ε-CL-20/POHDA core-shell composites.
Figure 7. XPS spectra for ε-CL-20, POHDA, and ε-CL-20/POHDA core-shell composites.
Applsci 10 02663 g007
Applsci 10 02663 g008 550
Figure 8. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves for epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20) and different composites.
Figure 8. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves for epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20) and different composites.
Applsci 10 02663 g008
Applsci 10 02663 g009 550
Figure 9. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) the conformers from four polymorphs of CL-20 and (b) ε-CL-20 at various temperatures.
Figure 9. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) the conformers from four polymorphs of CL-20 and (b) ε-CL-20 at various temperatures.
Applsci 10 02663 g009
Applsci 10 02663 g010 550
Figure 10. XRD patterns of core-shell composites at various temperatures: (a) ε-CL-20/PDA, (b) ε-CL-20/PLD, (c) ε-CL-20/PNE, and (d) ε-CL-20/POHDA.
Figure 10. XRD patterns of core-shell composites at various temperatures: (a) ε-CL-20/PDA, (b) ε-CL-20/PLD, (c) ε-CL-20/PNE, and (d) ε-CL-20/POHDA.
Applsci 10 02663 g010
Applsci 10 02663 g011 550
Figure 11. Phase analysis of ε-CL-20 and different composites.
Figure 11. Phase analysis of ε-CL-20 and different composites.
Applsci 10 02663 g011
Table
Table 1. Composition of core-shell microcapsules.
Table 1. Composition of core-shell microcapsules.
Sampleε-CL-20 Content (wt %)Content (wt %)
epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20)1000
ε-CL-20/polydopamine (PDA)98.41.6
ε-CL-20/poly-L-dopamine (PLD)99.30.7
ε-CL-20/poly-norepinephrine (PNE)98.71.3
ε-CL-20/poly-6-hydroxydopamine (POHDA)98.61.4
Table
Table 2. Surface element composition of samples as evaluated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
Table 2. Surface element composition of samples as evaluated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
SampleC1s (%)N1s (%)O1s (%)N/C
ε-CL-2032.7634.6832.561.06
PDA72.388.2119.410.11
PLD63.298.4528.260.13
PNE67.248.224.560.12
POHDA67.728.0824.20.12
ε-CL-20/PDA46.3323.8329.840.51
ε-CL-20/PLD39.827.7832.420.70
ε-CL-20/PNE41.5826.2932.130.63
ε-CL-20/POHDA44.8924.6630.450.55
Table
Table 3. Thermal analysis data of epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20) and different composites.
Table 3. Thermal analysis data of epsilon-CL-20 (ε-CL-20) and different composites.
SampleEndothermic Peak
To (°C)Tp (°C)Te (°C)∆H (Jg−1)
ε-CL-20144.5156.3171.4−41.3
ε-CL-20/PDA172.3179187.1−28.1
ε-CL-20/PLD157.6165.3174.7−35.8
ε-CL-20/PNE164.8172.5184.5−32.9
ε-CL-20/POHDA173.4176185.2−30.4
Table
Table 4. Impact and friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20 and different composites.
Table 4. Impact and friction sensitivity of ε-CL-20 and different composites.
SampleImpact Sensitivity (H50, cm)Friction Sensitivity (P, %)
ε-CL-2013 ± 196
ε-CL-20/PDA12 ± 148
ε-CL-20/PLD13 ± 160
ε-CL-20/PNE14 ± 160
ε-CL-20/POHDA12 ± 156

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Jiao, Q.; Zhao, W.; Guo, X.; Li, D.; Sun, X. Enhanced Crystal Stabilities of ε-CL-20 via Core-Shell Structured Energetic Composites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082663

AMA Style

Zhang H, Jiao Q, Zhao W, Guo X, Li D, Sun X. Enhanced Crystal Stabilities of ε-CL-20 via Core-Shell Structured Energetic Composites. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(8):2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Honglei, Qingjie Jiao, Wanjun Zhao, Xueyong Guo, Dayong Li, and Xiaole Sun. 2020. "Enhanced Crystal Stabilities of ε-CL-20 via Core-Shell Structured Energetic Composites" Applied Sciences 10, no. 8: 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082663

APA Style

Zhang, H., Jiao, Q., Zhao, W., Guo, X., Li, D., & Sun, X. (2020). Enhanced Crystal Stabilities of ε-CL-20 via Core-Shell Structured Energetic Composites. Applied Sciences, 10(8), 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop