Next Article in Journal
A Framework for Identifying Influential People by Analyzing Social Media Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Ingredients for Biscuits Enriched with Rapeseed Press Cake—Changes in Their Antioxidant and Sensory Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Ferroelectret Ultrasonic Transducers for Pulse-Echo Water Immersion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Performance of Different Grains in Gluten-Free Bread Applications

Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 111 Domneasca Str., 800201 Galati, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(24), 8772; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248772
Submission received: 19 November 2020 / Revised: 5 December 2020 / Accepted: 7 December 2020 / Published: 8 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Plants’ Ingredients on Dough and Final Product)

Abstract

A comparative analysis of quinoa, sorghum, millet and rice flours and breads in terms of proximate composition, resistant starch, antioxidant activity and total phenolic content was realized in this study. Quinoa whole flour had the highest content of proteins, fat, ash and total dietary fiber, followed by millet and sorghum flours. Quinoa and rice breads had higher specific volume (192.22 and 181.04 cm3/100 g, respectively) and lower crumb firmness (10.81 and 13.74 N, respectively) compared to sorghum and millet breads. The highest total phenol content was obtained in the case of bread prepared with quinoa flour (398.42 mg ferulic acid equiv/100 g d.w.), while the lowest content was obtained for the rice flour bread (70.34 mg ferulic acid equiv/100 g d.w). The antioxidant activity of gluten-free breads decreased in the following order: sorghum > quinoa > millet > rice. Quinoa bread had the highest resistant starch content of 3.28% d.w., while the rice bread had the highest digestible starch content of 81.48% d.w. The slowly digestible starch varied from 15.5% d.w. for quinoa bread, to 6.51% d.w. for millet bread. These results revealed the huge potential of quinoa, sorghum and millet to be used for developing functional gluten-free bread.
Keywords: quinoa; millet; sorghum; rice; gluten-free bread quinoa; millet; sorghum; rice; gluten-free bread

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banu, I.; Aprodu, I. Assessing the Performance of Different Grains in Gluten-Free Bread Applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8772. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248772

AMA Style

Banu I, Aprodu I. Assessing the Performance of Different Grains in Gluten-Free Bread Applications. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(24):8772. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banu, Iuliana, and Iuliana Aprodu. 2020. "Assessing the Performance of Different Grains in Gluten-Free Bread Applications" Applied Sciences 10, no. 24: 8772. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248772

APA Style

Banu, I., & Aprodu, I. (2020). Assessing the Performance of Different Grains in Gluten-Free Bread Applications. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 8772. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248772

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop