Next Article in Journal
The Flexor Retinaculum Connects the Surrounding Structures into the Medial Ankle Complex
Previous Article in Journal
Development of an AI Userbot for Engineering Design Education Using an Intent and Flow Combined Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiplate® Platelet Aggregation Findings Are Dependent on Platelet Count but Can Be Corrected by Use of a Ratio

Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(22), 7971; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227971
Submission received: 4 October 2020 / Revised: 24 October 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 / Published: 10 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering)

Abstract

Impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) detects the effects of platelet aggregation inhibitors and can predict thrombotic complications after coronary and cerebrovascular stent interventions. The bedside method uses whole blood samples not corrected for platelet count. It is claimed but not proved that the findings are unrelated to platelet count in the physiological range. We therefore investigated in the experimental study: (1) whether impedance aggregometry findings and platelet count are correlated and (2) whether the aggregation/platelet count ratio expresses platelet function independent of platelet count. Following ethics committee approval, platelet-rich plasma from healthy probands was diluted with platelet-poor plasma to obtain different platelet counts. Thereafter, platelet count was measured and samples were subjected to impedance aggregometry using thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) for platelet activation. In all probands, impedance aggregometry findings and platelet count were highly correlated (r = 0.88 to 0.94; p < 0.05). The combination of all experiments revealed the proportionality between impedance aggregometry findings and platelet count (n = 31, r = 0.78, p = 0.0001). In contrast, the ratio of impedance aggregometry findings and platelet count was not significantly correlated with platelet count (r = 0.017; p = 0.3) and thus constitutes a specific measure for platelet function. In conclusion, impedance aggregometry findings subsequent to the activation with TRAP are dependent on both platelet function and platelet count. Normalization of impedance aggregometry findings for platelet count can be achieved by a ratio resulting in more specific results.
Keywords: multiplate-device; impedance aggregometry; platelet aggregation; platelet count multiplate-device; impedance aggregometry; platelet aggregation; platelet count

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soliman, M.; Hartmann, M. Multiplate® Platelet Aggregation Findings Are Dependent on Platelet Count but Can Be Corrected by Use of a Ratio. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227971

AMA Style

Soliman M, Hartmann M. Multiplate® Platelet Aggregation Findings Are Dependent on Platelet Count but Can Be Corrected by Use of a Ratio. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(22):7971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227971

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soliman, Mohamed, and Matthias Hartmann. 2020. "Multiplate® Platelet Aggregation Findings Are Dependent on Platelet Count but Can Be Corrected by Use of a Ratio" Applied Sciences 10, no. 22: 7971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227971

APA Style

Soliman, M., & Hartmann, M. (2020). Multiplate® Platelet Aggregation Findings Are Dependent on Platelet Count but Can Be Corrected by Use of a Ratio. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 7971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227971

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop