Next Article in Journal
Karl Fischer Water Titration—Principal Component Analysis Approach on Bread Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Implementation of Digital Twin for Engine Block Manufacturing Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization Design of RV Reducer Crankshaft Bearing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Digital Twin and Web-Based Virtual Gaming Technologies for Online Education: A Case of Construction Management and Engineering

Digital Twin and Internet of Things—Current Standards Landscape

Fraunhofer IOSB, Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(18), 6519;
Received: 20 August 2020 / Revised: 10 September 2020 / Accepted: 15 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Twins in Industry)
Industry 4.0 is revolutionizing industrial production by bridging the physical and the virtual worlds and further improving digitalization. Two essential building blocks in industry 4.0 are digital twins (DT) and the internet of things (IoT). While IoT is about connecting resources and collecting data about the physical world, DTs are the virtual representations of resources organizing and managing information and being tightly integrated with artificial intelligence, machine learning and cognitive services to further optimize and automate production. The concepts of DTs and IoT are overlapping when it comes to describing, discovering and accessing resources. Currently, there are multiple DT and IoT standards covering these overlapping aspects created by different organizations with different backgrounds and perspectives. With regard to interoperability, which is presumably the most important aspect of industry 4.0, this barrier needs to be overcome by consolidation of standards. The objective of this paper is to investigate current DT and IoT standards and provide insights to stimulate this consolidation. Overlapping aspects are identified and a classification scheme is created and applied to the standards. The results are compared, aspects with high similarity or divergence are identified and a proposal for stimulating consolidation is presented. Consensus between standards are found regarding the elements a resource should consist of and which serialization format(s) and network protocols to use. Controversial topics include which query language to use for discovery as well as if geo-spatial, temporal and historical data should be explicitly supported. View Full-Text
Keywords: digital twin; internet of things; interoperability; standardization digital twin; internet of things; interoperability; standardization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Jacoby, M.; Usländer, T. Digital Twin and Internet of Things—Current Standards Landscape. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6519.

AMA Style

Jacoby M, Usländer T. Digital Twin and Internet of Things—Current Standards Landscape. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(18):6519.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jacoby, Michael, and Thomas Usländer. 2020. "Digital Twin and Internet of Things—Current Standards Landscape" Applied Sciences 10, no. 18: 6519.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop