Previous Article in Journal
Pedagogy over Technology: Evidence from a European Study of Generation Z Students in Entrepreneurship Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond Platform Work: Algorithmic Management in Platform Labor and Traditional Organizations—The Hungarian Experience
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Algorithmic Management Across Platform and Traditional Work: Evidence from Hungary—Testing the Five Principles of Stark and Vanden Broeck

1
Doctoral School of Regional and Business Administration Sciences, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Gyor, Hungary
2
Institute of the Information Society, Ludovika University of Public Service, 1083 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(9), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16090459 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 21 July 2026 / Revised: 15 September 2026 / Accepted: 16 September 2026 / Published: 18 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Age of AI in the Management of Businesses and Supply Chains)

Abstract

Algorithmic management (AM) has become a key lens for analyzing the digital transformation of work, yet empirical research remains centered on platform labor in North America, Western Europe, and China. This paper applies the five-principles framework covering organizational form, object of management, ideology, modality, and accountability in an exploratory comparison of contrasting organizational settings within one country, Hungary. We define AM as the exercise of managerial functions such as direction, allocation, evaluation, discipline, and remuneration through software systems that continuously capture worker data, process them automatically, and feed the resulting decisions back into the labor process. The analysis draws on a base of 43 semi-structured interviews conducted between 2019 and 2024, all of which, drawn from the five interview-based cases (Wolt, Bolt, Upwork, Data Analytics and ConLog), constitute the coded analytical corpus, together with 21 h of participant observation and documentary evidence, contrasting four platform cases (Wolt, Bolt, Uber, and the freelance marketplace Upwork) with two traditional organizations, a Data Analytics company and a multinational logistics subsidiary. Evidence on Uber is confined to documentary sources (regulatory, parliamentary, legal and media records); the case is therefore used as an institutional and regulatory comparator only, and no worker-level generalizations are drawn from it. Findings suggest that AM is neither homogeneous nor confined to platforms. Full co-optation, including twisted accountability and dissolved organizational boundaries, appears mainly in platform work, whereas AM in traditional firms operates within hierarchies and formal employment, producing constrained co-optation, bounded ideology, and partially re-anchored accountability. We propose the partial Möbius effect as a testable hypothesis rather than as an established theoretical result: it was derived inductively from two traditional cases only (Data Analytics and ConLog) and has not yet been tested against a third, independent case. Its scope, boundary conditions, and durability are left as questions for future comparative and longitudinal research.
Keywords: algorithmic management; organizational forms; platform labor; traditional work; partial Möbius effect; labor process theory; accountability; Hungary; Central and Eastern Europe algorithmic management; organizational forms; platform labor; traditional work; partial Möbius effect; labor process theory; accountability; Hungary; Central and Eastern Europe

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zelles, T.; Pap, J.; Makó, C. Algorithmic Management Across Platform and Traditional Work: Evidence from Hungary—Testing the Five Principles of Stark and Vanden Broeck. Adm. Sci. 2026, 16, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16090459

AMA Style

Zelles T, Pap J, Makó C. Algorithmic Management Across Platform and Traditional Work: Evidence from Hungary—Testing the Five Principles of Stark and Vanden Broeck. Administrative Sciences. 2026; 16(9):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16090459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zelles, Tamás, József Pap, and Csaba Makó. 2026. "Algorithmic Management Across Platform and Traditional Work: Evidence from Hungary—Testing the Five Principles of Stark and Vanden Broeck" Administrative Sciences 16, no. 9: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16090459

APA Style

Zelles, T., Pap, J., & Makó, C. (2026). Algorithmic Management Across Platform and Traditional Work: Evidence from Hungary—Testing the Five Principles of Stark and Vanden Broeck. Administrative Sciences, 16(9), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16090459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop