Phytoremediation Potential of Native Species in Arid Soils Impacted by Gold Mining
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Seed and Soil Sampling
2.2. Experimental Design and Growth Conditions
2.2.1. Soil Analysis and Contamination Indices
2.2.2. Determination of Metal(loid) Concentrations in Plant Tissues and Bioaccumulation Indices
2.2.3. Plant Morpho-Physiological Parameters
2.3. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers
2.3.1. Ascorbate Peroxidase (APX) and Guaiacol Peroxidase (POX) Activity
2.3.2. Lipid Peroxidation
2.4. Colony-Forming Unit (CFU) Count
2.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX)
2.6. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Soil Parameters
3.1.1. Soil Physicochemical Variables and Contamination Indexes
3.1.2. Colony-Forming Units (CFUs)
3.2. Mopho-Physiological Parameters
3.3. Concentration of Metal(loid)s in Vegetative Organs
Bioaccumulation (BAF) and Translocation (TF) Factors
3.4. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers
Antioxidant Activity and Lipid Peroxidation
3.5. Metal(loid) Histolocation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BAF | Bioaccumulation Factor |
| TF | Translocation Factor |
| APX | Ascorbate Peroxidase |
| POX | Guaiacol Peroxidase |
| MDA | Malondialdehyde |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| H2O2 | Hydrogen Peroxide |
| TBA | Thiobarbituric Acid |
| TCA | Trichloroacetic Acid |
| CFUs | Colony-Forming Units |
| CF | Contamination Factor |
| Cdeg | Contamination Degree |
| S1 | Contaminated Site |
| S2 | Reference Site |
| T0 | 0% Mining Waste |
| T1 | 1% Mining Waste |
| T10 | 10% Mining Waste |
| T50 | 50% Mining Waste |
| T100 | 100% Mining Waste |
| SEM-EDX | Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy Dispersive X-ray Detector |
References
- Zulfiqar, U.; Farooq, M.; Hussain, S.; Maqsood, M.; Hussain, M.; Ishfaq, M.; Ahmad, M.; Anjum, M.Z. Lead toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 250, 109557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sarker, R.K.; Chakraborty, P.; Paul, P.; Chatterjee, A.; Tribedi, P. Degradation of low-density poly ethylene (LDPE) by Enterobacter cloacae AKS7: A potential step towards sustainable environmental remediation. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 2117–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tamma, A.A.; Lejcuś, K.; Fiałkiewicz, W.; Marczak, D. Advancing Phytoremediation: A Review of Soil Amendments for Heavy Metal Contamination Management. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Heredia, B.; Tapia, R.; Young, B.J.; Hasuoka, P.; Pacheco, P.; Roqueiro, G. Phytoextraction of Cu, Cd, Zn and As in four shrubs and trees growing on soil contaminated with mining waste. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Okereafor, U.; Makhatha, M.; Mekuto, L.; Uche-Okereafor, N.; Sebola, T.; Mavumengwana, V. Toxic Metal Implications on Agricultural Soils, Plants, Animals, Aquatic life and Human Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hasan, M.M.; Uddin, M.N.; Ara-Sharmeen, I.; F. Alharby, H.; Alzahrani, Y.; Hakeem, K.R.; Zhang, L. Assisting Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals Using Chemical Amendments. Plants 2019, 8, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yan, A.; Wang, Y.; Tan, S.N.; Mohd Yusof, M.L.; Ghosh, S.; Chen, Z. Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Acharya, A.; Bellaloui, N.; Pilipovic, A.; Perez, E.; Maddox-Mandolini, M.; Fuente, H.D.L. Current Assessment and Future Perspectives on Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals. Plants 2025, 14, 2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jeyakumar, P.; Debnath, C.; Vijayaraghavan, R.; Muthuraj, M. Trends in bioremediation of heavy metal contaminations. J. Environ. Eng. Res. 2023, 28, 220631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tovar-Sánchez, E.; Cervantes-Ramírez, T.; Castañeda-Bautista, J.; Gómez-Arroyo, S.; Ortiz-Hernández, L.; Sánchez-Salinas, E.; Mussali-Galante, P. Response of Zea mays to multimetal contaminated soils: A multibiomarker approach. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 1161–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yadav, P.; Jha, S.; Kumari, P.; Sharma, A.; Singh, S. Exogenous salicylic acid application alleviates chromium toxicity in seedlings of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) by reducing chromium uptake and enhancing antioxidative capacity. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2025, 27, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roqueiro, G.; Maldonado, S.; Ríos, M.d.C.; Maroder, H. Fluctuation of oxidative stress indicators in Salix nigra seeds during priming. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3631–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Yin, K.; Guo, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Zong, H.; Xing, M.J.A. The protective effect of Zn2+ on As3+ toxicity in common carp: Resistance to oxidative stress, inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress, apoptosis and autophagy. Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yan, D.M.; Guo, Z.H.; Huang, F.L.; Ran, H.Z.; Zhang, L. Effect of Calcium Magnesium Phosphate on Remediation Paddy Soil Contaminated with Cadmium Using Lime and Sepiolite. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2020, 41, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansoor, S.; Ali, A.; Kour, N.; Bornhorst, J.; AlHarbi, K.; Rinklebe, J.; Abd El Moneim, D.; Ahmad, P.; Chung, Y.S.J.P. Heavy metal induced oxidative stress mitigation and ROS scavenging in plants. Plants 2023, 12, 3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, G.; Li, B.; Qin, X.; Xu, J.; Li, X.J.C. Phytoremediation potential evaluation of three rhubarb species and comparative analysis of their rhizosphere characteristics in a Cd-and Pb-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2022, 296, 134045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feki, K.; Tounsi, S.; Mrabet, M.; Mhadhbi, H.; Brini, F. Recent advances in physiological and molecular mechanisms of heavy metal accumulation in plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 64967–64986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bian, F.; Zhong, Z.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Gu, L.; Huang, Z.; Gai, X.; Huang, Z. Intercropping improves heavy metal phytoremediation efficiency through changing properties of rhizosphere soil in bamboo plantation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tiodar, E.D.; Văcar, C.L.; Podar, D. Phytoremediation and Microorganisms-Assisted Phytoremediation of Mercury-Contaminated Soils: Challenges and Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Calabró, M.R.; Roqueiro, G.; Tapia, R.; Crespo, D.C.; Bargiela, M.F.; Young, B.J. Chronic toxicity, bioavailability and bioaccumulation of Zn, Cu and Pb in Lactuca sativa exposed to waste from an abandoned gold mine. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Villagra, P.E.; Passera, C.B.; Greco, S.; Sartor, C.E.; Meglioli, P.A.; Alvarez, J.A.; Dágata, S.; Vega Riveros, C.; Allegretti, L.I.; Fernández, M.E. Ecological restoration and productive recovery of saline environments from the Argentine Monte Desert using native plants. In Saline and Alkaline Soils in Latin America: Natural Resources, Management and Productive Alternatives; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 313–338. [Google Scholar]
- USEPA. U.E.P.A. Standard Elutriate Preparation. Guidance for performing Tier II Evaluations. Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Discharge in Waters of the U.S.—Testing Manual; USEPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
- Hakanson, L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentological approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Poschenrieder, C.; Bech, J.; Llugany, M.; Pace, A.; Fenés, E.; Barceló, J. Copper in plant species in a copper gradient in Catalonia (North East Spain) and their potential for phytoremediation. Plant Soil 2001, 230, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, T.; Xie, F.; Wei, Z.; Zeng, S.; Wu, Q.T. Phytoremediation of sewage sludge and use of its leachate for crop production. Environ. Technol. 2015, 36, 3000–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kurtzman, C.P. Three new ascomycetous yeasts from insect-associated arboreal habitats. Can. J. Microbiol. 1999, 46, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Heredia, B.; Recio, P.D.; Young, B.J.; Pacheco, P.; Zungre, F.B.; Hruby, S.; Acevedo, M.A.; Mercado, M.I.; Roqueiro, G. Strategies of physiological, morpho-anatomical and biochemical adaptation in seedlings of native species exposed to mining waste. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 290, 117750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kicińska, A.; Pomykała, R.; Izquierdo-Diaz, M. Changes in soil pH and mobility of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2022, 73, e13203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, C.; Wu, B.; Jiang, K.; Wei, M.; Wang, S. Effects of different concentrations and types of Cu and Pb on soil N-fixing bacterial communities in the wheat rhizosphere. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 144, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Cao, Y.; Xiao, J.; Salam, M.M.A.; Chen, G. Bamboo biochar greater enhanced Cd/Zn accumulation in Salix psammophila under non-flooded soil compared with flooded. Biochar 2022, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.; Luo, L. The major gene families related to cadmium absorption and transportation in plants. Genom. Appl. Biol. 2013, 32, 127–134. Available online: https://cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20133131726 (accessed on 6 February 2026).
- Cioica, N.; Tudora, C.; Iuga, D.; Deak, G.; Matei, M.; Nagy, E.M.; Gyorgy, Z. A review on phytoremediation as an ecological method for in situ clean up of heavy metals contaminated soils. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Hulls, France, 2019; p. 03024. [Google Scholar]
- Thakur, M.; Praveen, S.; Divte, P.R.; Mitra, R.; Kumar, M.; Gupta, C.K.; Kalidindi, U.; Bansal, R.; Roy, S.; Anand, A.; et al. Metal tolerance in plants: Molecular and physicochemical interface determines the “not so heavy effect” of heavy metals. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Phua, S.Y.; De Smet, B.; Remacle, C.; Chan, K.X.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen species and organellar signaling. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 5807–5824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xie, X.; He, Z.; Chen, N.; Tang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Cai, Y. The Roles of Environmental Factors in Regulation of Oxidative Stress in Plant. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 9732325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Namdjoyan, S.; Namdjoyan, S.; Kermanian, H. Phytochelatin synthesis and responses of antioxidants during arsenic stress in Nasturtium officinale. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 63, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ahmad, A.; Khan, W.U.; Shah, A.A.; Yasin, N.A.; Naz, S.; Ali, A.; Tahir, A.; Batool, A.I. Synergistic effects of nitric oxide and silicon on promoting plant growth, oxidative stress tolerance and reduction of arsenic uptake in Brassica juncea. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sharma, P.; Dutta, D.; Udayan, A.; Nadda, A.K.; Lam, S.S.; Kumar, S. Role of microbes in bioaccumulation of heavy metals in municipal solid waste: Impacts on plant and human being. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 305, 119248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Al Mahmud, J.; Bhuyan, M.B.; Anee, T.I.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Reactive oxygen species metabolism and antioxidant defense in plants under metal/metalloid stress. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Agronomic, Molecular and Biotechnological Approaches; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 221–257. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, J.; Yang, T.; Friman, V.-P.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Hautier, Y.; Li, M.; Wei, Z.; Xu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Jousset, A. Introduction of probiotic bacterial consortia promotes plant growth via impacts on the resident rhizosphere microbiome. Proc. R. Soc. B 2021, 288, 20211396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, R.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Li, T.; Zhang, H.; Cui, X.; Cui, Z. Ecological toxicity of Cd, Pb, Zn, Hg and regulation mechanism in Solanum nigrum L. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sarker, A.; Al Masud, M.A.; Deepo, D.M.; Das, K.; Nandi, R.; Ansary, M.W.R.; Islam, A.R.M.T.; Islam, T. Biological and green remediation of heavy metal contaminated water and soils: A state-of-the-art review. Chemosphere 2023, 332, 138861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]







| Concentration of Metal(loid)s in Total and Soluble Fractions (mg kg−1) | pH | EC (mS cm−1) | CFU (g−1 mL−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | As | Cu | Cd | Zn | ||||||||
| Total | Soluble | Total | Soluble | Total | Soluble | Total | Soluble | Bacteria | Yeasts | |||
| T0 | 14.3 | 0.1 | 7.9 | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 63.3 | 0.1 | 7.5 | 0.1 | 1.37 × 10+6 | 5.5 × 10+4 |
| T1 | 84.1 | 0.2 | 22.3 | 0.03 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 245.1 | 0.3 | 7.7 | 0.5 | 5.7 × 10+5 | 6.0 × 10+4 |
| T10 | 1572.6 | 0.1 | 27.9 | 0.03 | 33.0 | 0.2 | 1032.3 | 0.2 | 7.8 | 1.7 | 9.45 × 10+5 | 7.0 × 10+4 |
| T50 | 5178.8 | 0.2 | 114.0 | nd | 231.3 | 4.5 | 4083.3 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 5.0 | nd | 1.0 × 10+4 |
| T100 | 7322.1 | 0.2 | 226.2 | nd | 328.9 | 3.0 | 5677.6 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 1.5 × 10+4 | 5.0 × 10+3 |
| Parameter | Plant Species | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larrea cuneifolia | Bulnesia retama | Plectrocarpa tetracantha | Neltuma flexuosa | |||||||||
| T0 | T1 | T10 | T0 | T1 | T10 | T0 | T1 | T10 | T0 | T1 | T10 | |
| Stem height (mm) | ||||||||||||
| 15 days | 32.1 ± 5.7 a | 48.2 ± 4.6 a | 38.7 ± 3.2 a | 81.4 ± 9.4 a | 83.6 ± 6.3 a | 80.9 ± 9.4 a | 66.7 ± 12.8 a | 61.6 ± 3.1 a | 51.0 ± 4.3 a | 68 ± 5.6 ab | 75.9 ± 4.2 a | 57.0 ± 3.0 b |
| 45 days | 50.9 ± 8.3 a | 73.8 ± 5.8 a | 46.8 ± 9.0 a | 126.4 ± 11.2 a | 133.8 ± 10.3 a | 111.0 ± 13.9 a | 112.5 ± 16.2 a | 116.9 ± 5.8 a | 71.3 ± 5.0 b | 110.3 ± 10.8 a | 127.1 ± 7.3 a | 72.5 ± 6.2 b |
| 75 days | 78.6 ± 2.2 a | 104.4 ± 8.3 a | 71.4 ± 13.7 a | 213.0 ± 9.9 ab | 266.6 ± 32.2 a | 174.2 ± 18.2 b | 234.8 ± 28.5 a | 241.7 ± 27.2 a | 92.3 ± 16.6 b | 241.0 ± 36.6 b | 361.2 ± 18.1 a | 84.9 ± 8.3 c |
| BD (mm) | ||||||||||||
| 15 days | 1.1 ± 0.2 a | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 2.0 ± 0.2 a | 2.0 ± 0.1 a | 2.0 ± 0.1 a | 1.6 ± 0.1 a | 1.6 ± 0.2 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 a | 1.6 ± 0.2 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 a |
| 45 days | 1.0 ± 0.1 b | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.0 ± 0.1 b | 2.0 ± 0.1 a | 2.1 ± 0.1 a | 2.1 ± 0.1 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 a |
| 75 days | 1.7 ± 0.1 b | 2.1 ± 0.0 a | 1.3 ± 0.2 b | 2.2 ± 0.1 a | 2.4 ± 0.1 a | 2.1 ± 0.1 a | 2.1 ± 0.1 a | 2.2 ± 0.1 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 b | 1.9 ± 0.1 ab | 2.3 ± 0.2 a | 1.5 ± 0.1 b |
| Green leaves (n°) | ||||||||||||
| 15 days | 9.1 ± 2.4 a | 14.9 ± 2.4 a | 10.3 ± 1.6 a | 9.9 ± 2.0 a | 8.4 ± 1.0 a | 11.1 ± 1.1 a | 11.2 ± 1.1 a | 10.8 ± 1.0 a | 9.5 ± 1.0 a | 4.8 ± 1.0 a | 6.4 ± 1.0 a | 5.0 ± 1.0 a |
| 45 days | 15.6 ± 3.3 a | 25.3 ± 3.1 a | 5.4 ± 1.4 b | 18.9 ± 2.2 a | 20.0 ± 1.1 a | 7.3 ± 1.6 b | 16.5 ± 2.0 a | 17.5 ± 1.0 a | 9.0 ± 1.5 b | 9.3 ± 1.8 a | 10.0 ± 1.3 a | 1.8 ± 1.0 b |
| 75 days | 48.3 ± 7.5 a | 76.0 ± 5.8 a | 12.3 ± 6.4 b | 45.3 ± 4.1 a | 47.8 ± 3.8 a | 5.7 ± 1.0 b | 31.3 ± 2.5 b | 49.0 ± 5.7 a | 8.5 ± 3.6 c | 13.6 ± 1.4 b | 23.0 ± 1.3 a | 1.0 ± 0.4 c |
| Damaged leaves (n°) | ||||||||||||
| 15 days | 1.0 ± 0.5 a | 1.0 ± 0.5 a | 1.1 ± 0.5 a | 0.4 ± 0.3 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 a | 0.4 ± 0.2 a | nd | 0.3 ± 0.2 a | 0.3 ± 0.2 a | 1.0 ± 0.4 a | 1.0 ± 0.4 a | 1.4 ± 0.4 a |
| 45 days | 1.0 ± 0.5 b | 0.4 ± 0.3 b | 1.1 ± 0.5 a | 1.0 ± 0.5 b | 1 ± 0.3 b | 7.6 ± 1.3 a | 0.3 ± 0.2 b | 1.2 ± 1.0 ab | 3.3 ± 1.1 a | 0.3 ± 0.2 b | 0.3 ± 0.2 b | 3.8 ± 0.4 a |
| 75 days | 1.0 ± 0.5 b | 0.3 ± 0.1 b | 15.3 ± 2.3 a | 0.2 ± 0.1 b | 1.0 ± 0.5 b | 22.7 ± 2.3 a | nd | nd | 6.0 ± 2.0 | 1.0 ± 0.4 b | 0.2 ± 0.1 b | 3.0 ± 1.0 a |
| Dry biomass (g) | ||||||||||||
| Aerial organs | 0.7 ± 0.1 b | 1.3 ± 0.1 a | 0.2 ± 0.0 c | 1.1 ± 0.1 ab | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.0 ± 0.1 b | 1.4 ± 0.2 a | 1.4 ± 0.1 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 b | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 2.0 ± 0.3 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 b |
| Root | 0.3 ± 0.1 ab | 0.4 ± 0.0 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 b | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.2 ± 0.0 a | 0.3 ± 0.0 a | 0.5 ± 0.1 a | 0.5 ± 0.0 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 b | 1.0 ± 0.0 a | 1.0 ± 0.1 a | 0.1 ± 0.0 b |
| Specie | As | Cu | Cd | Zn | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T10 | T0 | T1 | T10 | T0 | T1 | T10 | T0 | T1 | T10 | |
| L. cuneifolia | ||||||||||||
| Aerial organs | 208.8 ± 46.3 a | 275.1 ± 30.4 a | 288.8 ± 0.9 a | 45.6 ± 9.6 a | 35.9 ± 0.9 a | 37.5 ± 0.01 a | nd | nd | nd | 629.0 ± 54.1 b | 1496.0 ± 166.4 a | 1212.4 ± 4.9 ab |
| Root | 334.7 ± 33.3 b | 511.6 ± 65.4 b | 772.0 ± 2.1 a | 273.7 ± 36.0 b | 492.7 ± 111.0 ab | 640.7 ± 2.9 a | 23.4 ± 8.2 c | 77.7 ± 5.9 b | 236.6 ± 05 a | 663.4 ± 85.0 a | 8.9 ± 1.0 c | 24.2 ± 0.0 b |
| B. retama | ||||||||||||
| Aerial organs | 134.7 ± 27.8 b | 211.3 ± 13.1 ab | 219.9 ± 20.8 a | 38.2 ± 4.6 b | 68.4 ± 10.8 ab | 109.0 ± 15.9 a | nd | 11.1 ± 1.5 b | 134.3 ± 7.2 a | 413.1 ± 18.3 a | 827.1 ± 37.4 a | 13.3 ± 2.3 b |
| Root | 162.1 ± 20.5 b | 232.9 ± 4.1 b | 2223.2 ± 2.1 a | 167.4 ± 33.9 b | 169.9 ± 27.8 b | 946.9 ± 20.2 a | 12.6 ± 2.2 b | 25.6 ± 0.9 b | 327.2 ± 10.0 a | 958.6 ± 31.0 a | 1018.1 ± 50.0 a | 28.1 ± 6.3 b |
| P. tetracantha | ||||||||||||
| Aerial organs | 109.0 ± 3.5 c | 163.6 ± 8.3 b | 280.4 ± 14.4 a | 42.3 ± 2.6 b | 79.9 ± 6.2 b | 166.5 ± 14.6 a | nd | 6.8 ± 1.3 b | 274.1 ± 27.5 a | 441.4 ± 78.8 b | 1400.3 ± 190.6 a | 29.3 ± 0.6 c |
| Root | 187.7 ± 47.7 b | 357.0 ± 71.7 b | 712.5 ± 79.6 a | 143.0 ± 18.1 b | 209.6 ± 9.4 ab | 296.2 ± 44.5 a | 12.9 ± 0.6 c | 45.9 ± 9.2 b | 176.6 ± 31.0 a | 368.4 ± 0.5 b | 1895.1 ± 128.5 a | 20.1 ± 2.2 c |
| N. flexuosa | ||||||||||||
| Aerial organs | 198.0 ± 3.8 b | 341.0 ± 32.2 b | 676.0 ± 50.8 a | 70.5 ± 9.3 a | 79.1 ± 18.5 a | 69.4 ± 10.4 a | 6.7 ± 0.4 b | 6.8 ± 0.5 b | 277.5 ± 31.7 a | 310.1 ± 1.2 b | 564.3 ± 33.2 a | 35.0 ± 3.5 c |
| Root | 71.8 ± 9.9 c | 711.5 ± 23.5 a | 333.3 ± 43.1 b | 177.1 ± 14.7 a | 211.9 ± 6.2 a | 81.6 ± 18.3 b | 14.1 ± 0.1 b | 11.4 ± 2.0 b | 123.6 ± 16.7 a | 581.1 ± 16.6 b | 1619.8 ± 101.0 a | 12.8 ± 1.3 c |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Heredia, B.; Young, B.J.; Pacheco, P.; Burrieza, H.P.; Mercado, M.I.; Roqueiro, G. Phytoremediation Potential of Native Species in Arid Soils Impacted by Gold Mining. Environments 2026, 13, 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13030131
Heredia B, Young BJ, Pacheco P, Burrieza HP, Mercado MI, Roqueiro G. Phytoremediation Potential of Native Species in Arid Soils Impacted by Gold Mining. Environments. 2026; 13(3):131. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13030131
Chicago/Turabian StyleHeredia, Belén, Brian Jonathan Young, Pablo Pacheco, Hernán P. Burrieza, María Inés Mercado, and Gonzalo Roqueiro. 2026. "Phytoremediation Potential of Native Species in Arid Soils Impacted by Gold Mining" Environments 13, no. 3: 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13030131
APA StyleHeredia, B., Young, B. J., Pacheco, P., Burrieza, H. P., Mercado, M. I., & Roqueiro, G. (2026). Phytoremediation Potential of Native Species in Arid Soils Impacted by Gold Mining. Environments, 13(3), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13030131

