Next Article in Journal
Habitat Associations, Habitat Selection and Long-Term Monitoring of Land Snails: Quantifying Measurements to Better Detect Trends
Previous Article in Journal
Comment on Beltaos, S. Ice Jam Flooding of the Drying Peace-Athabasca Delta: Hindsight on the Accuracy of the Traditional Knowledge and Historical Flood Record. Environments 2025, 12, 376
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment for Fish Farm Effluent Using Green Coagulants and Recovery of the Produced Sludge

by
Sajjad Hatim Kadhim
1,
Asia Fadhile Almansoory
1,
Israa Abdulwahab Al-Baldawi
2,
Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah
3,
Karima F. Abbas
4,
Muhammad Fauzul Imron
5,6,* and
Setyo Budi Kurniawan
7
1
Department of Ecology, College of Science, University of Basrah, Basrah 61004, Iraq
2
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
3
Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor 43600, Malaysia
4
Environmental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Science, University of Karbala, Karbala 56001, Iraq
5
Study Program of Environmental Engineering, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Airlangga, Kampus C UNAIR, Jalan Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
6
Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
7
Research Centre for Environment and Clean Technologies, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jakarta Pusat 10340, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2026, 13(2), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020088
Submission received: 14 January 2026 / Revised: 2 February 2026 / Accepted: 2 February 2026 / Published: 4 February 2026

Abstract

Treatment of wastewater effluent is essential to reduce environmental impact and keep surface water clean, meeting sustainable criteria. While plant-based coagulants are known for their eco-friendly profiles, their dual application for high-efficiency nutrient removal and subsequent sludge valorization in fish farm systems remain under-explored. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the optimum conditions for using natural coagulants to recover nutrients from fish farm effluent. Two types of natural coagulants, Alhagi graecorum leaves and apricot seeds, were evaluated for the treatment and recovery of nutrients from fish farm effluent due to their high removal efficiency, non-toxicity, and cost-effectiveness. In this study, optimization was performed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with a Central Composite Design (CCD) to investigate the effects of three factors: coagulant concentration (1000–7000 mg/L), wastewater pH (5–9), and settling time (15–35 min). The primary responses measured were the removal efficiencies of phosphate (PO4) and nitrate (NO3). According to the CCD results, maximum removal efficiencies reached 92.63% and 73.49% for PO4 and NO3, respectively. The optimal conditions were identified as pH 5, 1000 mg/L coagulant concentration, and a 35 min settling time for A. graecorum, and pH 9, 1000 mg/L concentration, and a 15 min settling time for apricot seed. These findings establish the optimal conditions for using these natural substances as effective agents for sustainable wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Wastewater treatment is accomplished by physical methods such as filtration, settling, adsorption, and membrane filtration; chemical methods such as electrochemical, coagulation, oxidation, ion exchange, and disinfection; and biological methods such as microbial biodegradation, phytoremediation, constructed wetlands, and bioreactor digestion [1]. Coagulation and flocculation (CF) are a simple, dependable, and energy-efficient water treatment method. Natural green coagulant is an environmentally friendly treatment that leads to the recovery of materials [2]. There are various advanced physical, chemical, and biological treatment methods to remove pollutants from water. Coagulation–flocculation, electrocoagulation, adsorption, advanced oxidation processes, and bio-membrane technology are advanced methods adopted in water and wastewater treatment [3]. The coagulation–flocculation method is a suitable treatment technology for wastewater from aquatic waste due to its high removal efficiency, simplicity, and economic savings [4]. Coagulation involves chemical and physical processes that destabilize pollutants when natural coagulants are added, and flocculation then stimulates the aggregation of destabilized particles, forming large flakes that can settle [5]. The coagulants are classified by chemical composition into inorganic (aluminum sulfate), synthetic polymeric (polyaluminum chloride), and natural coagulants (plant leaves and seeds) [5].
Treatment by coagulation–flocculation involves a physico–chemical process that uses a coagulant to neutralize the negative charges in contaminated water, thereby reducing electrostatic repulsion within the electric double layer; this is known as the destabilization process [6]. The destabilization begins with an increase in ionic strength, which helps to promote double-layer compression, and/or with the adsorption of anions through the neutralization process of the particle’s surface charge. During low mixing, destabilized particles aggregate to form flocs, then undergo free precipitation, and are finally separated from the contaminated water. Choong Lek et al. [7] reported the use of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent and obtained a maximum turbidity removal of 86%. Some other researchers also reported the use of chitosan [8] and Moringa oleifera [9] for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent, achieving 95% and 99.5% turbidity reductions, respectively. Gaayda et al. [10] showed that the use of grape seed and Austrocylindropuntia mucilage can remove Congo red and turbidity from synthetic wastewater. According to response surface methodology, Box-Behnken design (RSM-BBD) results reached highest removal efficiency with 99.36 and 95.74% under optimum conditions of 0.45 mg/L of grape seed powder coagulant, 6 mL/L of Austrocylindropuntia mucilage flocculant, at pH of 10, initial Congo red concentration of 5 mg/L, initial turbidity of 250 NTU, and after settling time of 120 min [11]. Several findings have examined the role of natural coagulants/flocculants for the treatment of wastewater, such as Aleppo pine seeds for the removal of Congo red dye [12], grape seed for the removal of chromium (VI) ions [10], and a mix of Acanthus sennii C., Moringa stenopetala B., and Aloe vera L. to remove chemical oxygen demand (COD) from wet coffee processing wastewater [13].
While many studies have investigated coagulation–flocculation for the removal of colloidal particles, dyes, and turbidity in various industrial wastewaters, there is a notable scarcity of research focusing on the simultaneous high-efficiency recovery of macronutrients (PO4 and NO3) specifically from aquaculture effluent [14,15]. Furthermore, most existing literature focuses on purification without exploring the agricultural valorization of the resulting sludge within a circular bioeconomy framework. This study addresses this research gap by evaluating the dual-purpose efficacy of A. graecorum leaves and apricot seeds, locally available, low-cost biomass in Iraq, as both treatment agents and nutrient-capture vehicles. To address this gap, research was conducted using coagulants extracted from the leaves of A. graecorum and from apricot seeds. The innovation of this study is to adopt a sustainable environmental approach to wastewater treatment and recovery in the fish farm industry, providing eco-friendly clarification. The use of natural coagulants was explored and optimized using a central composite design (CCD) to achieve optimal treatment and recovery with selected leaves of A. graecorum and apricot seeds. This study aimed to investigate the ability of locally user-friendly leaves of A. graecorum and apricot seeds as a low-cost coagulant for the treatment and recovery of nutrients from fish farm wastewater, in order to protect the ecosystem.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Natural Coagulants and Wastewater

The leaves of the A. graecorum and apricot seeds were collected in the region of Basrah, Iraq. The selection of A. graecorum leaves and apricot seeds as green coagulants was based on their high abundance in Iraq and their distinct biochemical profiles, as reported in the previous literature. A. graecorum leaves were previously reported to contain tannins and polyphenols [16,17]. In contrast, apricot seeds were characterized by high protein, peptides, and pectin [18,19] which may function as a coagulant.
Wastewater used in the coagulation–flocculation tests was collected from a semi-intensive polyculture local fish farm in Basrah, Iraq, via grab sampling (n = 3) conducted during the fish grow-out period. This period was selected to capture the peak concentrations of organic and nutrient pollutants. This fish farm utilizes large earthen open basins for the simultaneous rearing of Cyprinus carpio (Common Carp) and Mesopotamichthys sharpeyi (Bunni). These basins operate on a semi-static water exchange basis. The aim of using natural coagulants to treat fish farm effluent was to recover nutrients (N and P) in settled sludges as fertilizer. Table 1 shows the initial characteristics of wastewater used in this optimization study.
The leaves of the A. graecorum and apricot seeds were previously dried in the oven (BINDER, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 80 °C for 48 h. The dried leaves and seeds were then crushed with a grinder (Mxbaoheng, Chicago, IL, USA), sieved with a 60 μm porous filter (Porex, Ningbo, China), and kept in a Duran bottle [20]. The preparation of the natural coagulant was performed by extraction with distilled water at a weight of green powder to volume of water (1000, 4000, and 7000 mg/L). After 1 h of stirring (Vitlab, Grossostheim, Germany), the solution was filtered through a cloth and then used for the coagulation experiment.
For initial fish farm effluent characterization, turbidity was measured with a turbidity meter (UPM GmbH, Augsburg, Germany), total suspended solids (TSS) were analyzed gravimetrically, and pH was measured with a portable pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Albstadt, Germany). As for the main parameter, NO3 and PO4 concentrations were analyzed using HACH DR6000 (HACH, Loveland, Colorado, USA) following the HACH kit protocol.

2.2. Coagulation–Flocculation Process for Pollutant Removal

The test of the green coagulant was conducted using jar tests to investigate the removal efficiency of nutrients from fish farm effluent. For each experiment, 500 mL of the fish farm effluent was put in 1000 mL beakers. The coagulant concentration, wastewater pH, and settling time were varied according to the experimental design, as shown in Table 2, for the two tested green coagulants. At the end of the coagulation–flocculation experiments, the final NO3 and PO4 were measured using a HACH DR6000 instrument.

2.3. Optimization Conditions

The CCD was used to investigate the effects of three independent variables: coagulant concentration (1000–7000 mg/L) of A. graecorum leaves and apricot seeds, wastewater treatment pH (5–9), and settling time (15–35 min). Table 2 shows the ranges and levels of the variables as outputs from Design-Expert software (version 13, Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The 3-level 3-factor CCD is applied to analyze and validate coagulation–flocculation parameters affecting the removal of nutrients by A. graecorum leaves and apricot seeds.
The CCD optimization yields a total of 15 experiments for factors A, B, and C at the levels, minimum −1, central 0, and maximum +1, as shown in Table 3 for both tested green coagulants. In this study, factors A (coagulant concentration), B (pH), and C (settling time) with two responses (PO4 and NO3 removals) and a face-centered CCD were selected for experimentation to obtain a natural number of factors [13]. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to validate the accuracy of RSM Models. The significance of the quadratic models was confirmed by high F-values and low p-values (p < 0.05) [21], indicating that the selected parameters have a statistically significant effect on nutrient recovery. Furthermore, the Lack of Fit for each model was found to be non-significant relative to the pure error, which implies that the models are highly reliable for predicting PO4 and NO3 removal within the space of the experimental design [22].

2.4. Fertilizer Preparation

The residual sludge was used to cultivate Raphanus sativus L. seeds for a week, the period during which plant seed growth was observed. The seed growth observation aimed to determine the germination index (GI) of recovered sludge after treatment with green coagulant for fish farm effluent. The choice of R. sativus L. for the GI test was based on its established role as a model bioindicator in environmental research, as it is susceptible to external chemical environments and on its recommendation by international guidelines (the US EPA and OECD) for terrestrial plant growth and toxicity tests [23].
The fertilizer was prepared at a 1:10 (g/v) ratio, with 10 g of recovered sludge and 100 mL of distilled water. The mixture was left for 3 h, then filtered through filter paper No. 1 (Whatman, Kent, UK). Six different fertilizer concentrations were prepared: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10%. The 0% treatment serves as a control, using sterile distilled water only to compare the effect of fertilizer on the growth of R. sativus L. seeds.
Sterile 15 cm Petri dishes were used, and sterile filter paper was placed at the bottom of each dish. Then, 5 mL of each fertilizer solution was added, with 2 replicates per concentration, and 8 Raphanus sativus L. seeds were placed in each dish and incubated in the incubator at 25 °C for 5 days.

2.5. Germination Index (GI)

Germination experiments using fish farm sludge were conducted to examine nutrient recovery as fertilizer through seed germination and growth [24]. A germination rate of 90% or higher was adopted for A. graecorum and apricot seeds, as it indicates better seed root growth. The recovery of sludge as fertilizer will accelerate seed growth and elongate roots [25]. The proportion of the number of growing seeds and the percentage of increasing root lengths were calculated using Equations (1) and (2), while the germination index was measured by following Equation (3) [26].
%   Seed   germination = N u m b e r   o f   g r o w i n g   s e e d s   i n   d i s h N u m b e r   o f   s e e d s   g r o w n   i n   c o n t r o l × 100
%   growing   root   lengths = A v e r a g e   r o o t   l e n g t h   i n   t h e   d i s h a v e r a g e   r o o t   l e n g t h   i n   t h e   c o n t r o l × 100
GI = % S e e d   g e r m i n a t i o n × % G r o w i n g   r o o t   l e n g t h s 100 × 100

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Coagulation–Flocculation Efficiency of A. graecorum Leaves and Apricot Seeds

The jar test results for A. graecorum leaves and apricot seed as green coagulants are listed in Table 4. For A. graecorum, the maximum removal efficiencies were 98.05% and 94.74%, while apricot seed coagulants showed 99.9% and 92.63% for PO4 and NO3, respectively. The differences in the ability of natural coagulants are due to the charge density and molecular weight of the green coagulant [4]. Optimum results were achieved with a coagulant concentration of 1000 m/L for both green coagulants and settling times of 35 and 15 min for A. graecorum and apricot seed, respectively. Optimum pollutant removal was observed in regions of the plot with low coagulant concentration, demonstrating that these levels were adequate for treating the fish farm wastewater. The observed decrease in efficiency at higher concentrations (4000–7000 mg/L) may be attributed to the restabilization phenomenon [27], in which an excess of coagulant leads to charge reversal on particle surfaces, preventing effective flocculation. While the 1000 mg/L was chosen based on previous literature for consistent floc formation, the results suggest that future studies could investigate even lower dosages to pinpoint the absolute minimum threshold for nutrient recovery.

3.2. Statistical Analysis and Regression Model

The generated equations are listed in Table 5. Quadratic polynomial and Two-Factor Interaction (2FI) models were used to determine the relationships between pollutant removal, PO4, and NO3, with coagulation concentration (A), pH (B), and settling time (C). Based on RSM, a CCD statistical analysis was used to select the most appropriate models from various adjustments to the experimental data, including regression significance, coefficient of determination (R-squared, R2), and adjusted R-squared (R2adj). The regression models were significant at the 95% confidence level (Table 6). The response Models’ R2 were >80%, and the differences with R2adj were <0.2, which can be considered well-adjusted [13].
Table 6 shows that all data were well adjusted in the present work, and the model explains up to 95.43% of the variation in the response when using A. graecorum as a coagulant and up to 91.96% when using apricot seed.

3.3. The 3D Plots with the Effects of Variables on the Response

Three-dimensional (3D) Response surfaces graphically represent the relationships between the response variable and the experimental levels of three independent variables: coagulation concentration (A), pH (B), and settling time (C). The 3D graphs (Figure 1 and Figure 2) for A. graecorum and apricot seed showed the correlation between the independent factor and response. These plots are created by fixing one variable at its optimal level while adapting the others within defined limits. Figure 1 and Figure 2 for A. graecorum and apricot seed show that 1000 mg/L of coagulant concentration and pH 5 and 9 are optimal for nutrient removal, respectively.

3.4. Optimum Conditions Using CCD

Optimum conditions are summarized in Table 7. The CCD predicted the highest removal efficiency for A. graecorum are 86.27% (PO4) and 73.49% (NO3) and for apricot seed are 92.60% (PO4) and 92.63% (NO3).
The CCD results showed an optimized coagulant quantity of 1000 mg/L, promoting high PO4 and NO3 removal at acidic pH (5) and basic pH (9) in media for A. graecorum leaves and apricot seed, respectively. The final process of coagulation–flocculation is the settling of produced flocs, which achieves high removal efficiency with a faster floc settling rate [12]. The faster flocs settling time was 35 min and 15 min for A. graecorum leaves and apricot seed, respectively (Table 7). In this study, the optimum condition was identified, with apricot seed providing the fastest settling time. The high removal efficiencies observed for PO4 and NO3 might be attributed to the interaction between the multi-functional groups of the plant extracts and the dissolved ions. In the case of A. graecorum, the presence of polyphenols likely facilitates charge neutralization [16,17], while the protein-rich matrix of apricot seeds promotes interparticle bridging [17,18]. These mechanisms allow for the transition from stable colloidal suspensions to settleable flocs.
While the nutrient removal efficiencies observed in this study are exceptionally high, they must be interpreted in the context of the specific effluent matrix and dosage requirements. Compared with conventional chemical coagulants such as alum or ferric chloride, which typically achieve similar removal rates at lower dosages (often 50–500 mg/L) [16,17], the green coagulants in this study required a minimum dosage of 1000 mg/L. However, the use of higher dosages is balanced by several practical advantages. Unlike chemical coagulants, which can significantly alter the pH of the treated water and introduce residual metallic ions, A. graecorum and apricot seeds are biodegradable and non-toxic. Furthermore, the higher volumes of sludge produced at these dosage levels are beneficial to this study’s objective. From a practical perspective, applying 1000 mg/L of plant-based coagulant is feasible in the Basrah region due to the abundance and low cost of these raw materials. While industrial-scale dosing equipment would need to handle larger volumes of solids compared to alum-based systems, the elimination of chemical procurement costs and the added value of the bio-fertilizer byproduct provide a strong economic incentive for local fish farmers to adopt this green technology.

3.5. Potential of Sludge Recovery

According to Table 8, the results for A. graecorum showed that the highest GI was 420% at a concentration of 10%, while concentrations of 2, 4, 6, and 8% reached 291, 148, 247, and 358, respectively. Hailu et al. [28] found that fishpond effluent was as effective as chemical fertilizer for tomato cultivation, offering an affordable, environmentally friendly option. Eid et al. [29] found that using fish farm effluent for irrigation could reduce mineral fertilizer use by 40% while eliminating the need for typical irrigation water in potato production.
For apricot seed (Table 8), the results showed that GI reached 223% at a concentration of 4% (Table 9), while concentrations of 2, 6, 8, and 10% reached 209, 81, 184, and 194, respectively. The GI values observed, reaching up to 420%, indicate a profound biostimulatory effect on R. sativus L. seeds. This exceptionally high value is attributed to the synergistic presence of concentrated bioavailable nitrogen (from NO3) and phosphorus (from PO4) captured within the organic matrix of the plant-based coagulants. Nesan et al. [30] evaluated membrane filtration and phytoremediation with Spirodela polyrhiza to treat fish farm wastewater, demonstrating increased total nutrient removal and improved water quality.
While the GI results confirm the immediate non-toxicity and nutrient-rich nature of the produced sludge, its broader agricultural application must be interpreted with caution. The high nutrient density that benefits initial germination could, if applied in excess, lead to soil nutrient imbalances in sensitive species [31]. Furthermore, although green coagulants are biodegradable, the long-term mineralization rates of this sludge across different soil types (e.g., the saline soils typical of the Basrah region) are yet to be fully characterized. Future research is required to evaluate the slow-release potential of these nutrients and to ensure that the accumulation of organic matter does not negatively impact soil porosity or microbial community structures over multiple growing seasons [32].

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the high potential of Alhagi graecorum leaves and apricot seeds as sustainable, low-cost green coagulants for treating fish farm effluent. The research successfully identified distinct operational envelopes for each material, revealing that A. graecorum excels in acidic environments, while apricot seed performs better in alkaline conditions. Rather than treating wastewater alone, the use of green coagulants facilitates the recovery of essential nutrients into a stable sludge. The high increase in the germination index of Raphanus sativus L. confirms that this sludge can be safely and effectively repurposed as a bio-fertilizer, offering a zero-waste solution for aquaculture management. Future research should focus on pilot-scale applications to assess the economic feasibility of large-scale nutrient recovery, while also evaluating the potential of using low concentrations (<1000 mg/L) and further functional compound characterization. Additionally, long-term studies are needed to assess the cumulative effects of recovered sludge on soil health and its performance across a broader range of food crops.

Author Contributions

Investigation and formal analysis, S.H.K.; supervision, A.F.A., I.A.A.-B. and S.R.S.A.; writing—original draft, S.H.K.; funding acquisition, A.F.A., I.A.A.-B. and K.F.A.; writing— review and editing, visualization, data curation, validation, M.F.I. and S.B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by Delft University of Technology.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Basrah, College of Science, Department of Ecology; the University of Baghdad; and the Ministry of Higher Education for their support of this research project. During the preparation of this manuscript, the author(s) used Grammarly (https://app.grammarly.com/) for language refinement. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Balbinoti, J.R.; dos Santos Junior, R.E.; de Sousa, L.B.F.; de Jesus Bassetti, F.; Balbinoti, T.C.V.; Jorge, R.M.M.; de Matos Jorge, L.M. Plant-Based Coagulants for Food Industry Wastewater Treatment. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 52, 103525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kurniawan, S.B.; Imron, M.F.; Sługocki, Ł.; Nowakowski, K.; Ahmad, A.; Najiya, D.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Othman, A.R.; Purwanti, I.F.; Hasan, H.A. Assessing the Effect of Multiple Variables on the Production of Bioflocculant by Serratia marcescens: Flocculating Activity, Kinetics, Toxicity, and Flocculation Mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 836, 155564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. El Gaayda, J.; Titchou, F.E.; Barra, I.; Karmal, I.; Afanga, H.; Zazou, H.; Yap, P.S.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Hamdani, M.; Akbour, R.A. Optimization of Turbidity and Dye Removal from Synthetic Wastewater Using Response Surface Methodology: Effectiveness of Moringa oleifera Seed Powder as a Green Coagulant. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 106988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kouniba, S.; Benbiyi, A.; Zourif, A.; EL Guendouzi, M. Optimization Use of Watermelon Rind in the Coagulation-Flocculation Process by Box Behnken Design for Copper, Zinc, and Turbidity Removal. Heliyon 2024, 10, e30823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kusuma, H.S.; Amenaghawon, A.N.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Neolaka, Y.A.B.; Widyaningrum, B.A.; Anyalewechi, C.L.; Orukpe, P.I. Evaluation of Extract of Ipomoea batatas Leaves as a Green Coagulant–Flocculant for Turbid Water Treatment: Parametric Modelling and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 102005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kurniawan, S.B.; Imron, M.F.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Othman, A.R.; Purwanti, I.F.; Hasan, H.A. Treatment of Real Aquaculture Effluent Using Bacteria-Based Bioflocculant Produced by Serratia marcescens. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 47, 102708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lek, B.L.C.; Peter, A.P.; Chong, K.H.Q.; Ragu, P.; Sethu, V.; Selvarajoo, A.; Arumugasamy, S.K. Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Using Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as a Natural Coagulant and Flocculant: Evaluation, Process Optimization and Characterization of Chickpea Powder. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 6243–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmad, A.L.; Sumathi, S.; Hameed, B.H. Coagulation of Residue Oil and Suspended Solid in Palm Oil Mill Effluent by Chitosan, Alum and PAC. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 118, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhatia, S.; Othman, Z.; Ahmad, A.L. Pretreatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Using Moringa oleifera Seeds as Natural Coagulant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 145, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El Gaayda, J.; Rachid, Y.; Titchou, F.E.; Barra, I.; Hsini, A.; Yap, P.-S.; Oh, W.-D.; Swanson, C.; Hamdani, M.; Akbour, R.A. Optimizing Removal of Chromium (VI) Ions from Water by Coagulation Process Using Central Composite Design: Effectiveness of Grape Seed as a Green Coagulant. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 307, 122805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El Gaayda, J.; Titchou, F.E.; Karmal, I.; Barra, I.; Errami, M.; Yap, P.S.; Oh, W.D.; Iqbal, A.; Sillanpää, M.; Hamdani, M.; et al. Application of Grape Seed and Austrocylindropuntia Mucilage for the Simultaneous Removal of Azo Dye and Turbidity from Synthetic Wastewater: Optimizing Experimental Conditions Using Box-Behnken Design (BBD). J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 58, 104718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hadadi, A.; Imessaoudene, A.; Bollinger, J.C.; Bouzaza, A.; Amrane, A.; Tahraoui, H.; Mouni, L. Aleppo Pine Seeds (Pinus halepensis Mill.) as a Promising Novel Green Coagulant for the Removal of Congo Red Dye: Optimization via Machine Learning Algorithm. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 331, 117286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Getahun, M.; Asaithambi, P.; Befekadu, A.; Alemayehu, E. Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal from Wet Coffee Processing Wastewater Using Indigenous Natural Coagulants: Optimization through Response Surface Methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 2024, 317, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Getahun, M.; Befekadu, A.; Alemayehu, E. Coagulation Process for the Removal of Color and Turbidity from Wet Coffee Processing Industry Wastewater Using Bio-Coagulant: Optimization through Central Composite Design. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tiruneh, G.S.; Golie, W.M.; Hailu, F.A.; Endris, A.M.; Demeke, G. Extraction and Characterization of Natural Coagulant Made from Banana Plant Stems (Musa acuminate) for the Removal of Turbidity from Wastewater. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 2023, 5574706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shaker, A.S.; Marrez, D.A.; Ali, M.A.; Fathy, H.M. Potential Synergistic Effect of Alhagi graecorum Ethanolic Extract with Two Conventional Food Preservatives against Some Foodborne Pathogens. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aljawdah, H.M.; Murshed, M.; Ammari, A.A.; Mares, M.; Al-Quraishy, S. Total Phenolic, Flavonoid, Flavonol, and Tannin Contents as Well as Antioxidant and Antiparasitic Activities of Aqueous Methanol Extract of Alhagi graecorum Plant Used in Traditional Medicine: Collected in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Open Chem. 2025, 23, 20250138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Muhidinov, Z.K.; Nasriddinov, A.S.; Strahan, G.D.; Jonmurodov, A.S.; Bobokalonov, J.T.; Ashurov, A.I.; Zumratov, A.H.; Chau, H.K.; Hotchkiss, A.T.; Liu, L.S. Structural Analyses of Apricot Pectin Polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, X.; Meng, T.; Ren, F.; An, N.; Chen, B.; Liu, X.; Liu, H. A Review on Apricot Kernel Seed Proteins and Peptides: Biological Functions and Food Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 292, 139053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meftah, K.; Meftah, S.; Lamkhanter, H.; Bouzid, T.; Rezzak, Y.; Touil, S.; Abid, A. Extraction and Optimization of Austrocylindropuntia subulata Powder as a Novel Green Coagulant. Desalin. Water Treat. 2024, 318, 100339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khoshvaght, H.; Delnavaz, M.; Leili, M. Optimization of Acetaminophen Removal from High Load Synthetic Pharmaceutical Wastewater by Experimental and ANOVA Analysis. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 42, 102107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jekel, C.F.; Haftka, R.T.; Venter, G.; Venter, M.P. Lack-of-Fit Tests to Indicate Material Model Improvement or Experimental Data Noise Reduction. In Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  23. Yavuz, B.; Januszewski, B.; Chen, T.; Delgado, A.G.; Westerhoff, P.; Rittmann, B. Using Radish (Raphanus lativus L.) Germination to Establish a Benchmark Dose for the Toxicity of Ozonated-Petroleum Byproducts in Soil. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Asranudin; Purnomo, A.S.; Fransina, E.G.; Holilah; Pratama, A.W.; Rohmah, A.A.; Pratama, S.A.; Simarani, K.; Kurniawan, S.B.; Dwiyanti, U.; et al. Eco-Friendly Degradation of Methyl Orange Using Ralstonia pickettii. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2025, 67, 103658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J.; Lin, Z.; Lee, C.T.; Hashim, H.; Wu, W.M.; Li, C. Recovery of Nutrients from Fish Sludge as Liquid Fertilizer to Enhance Sustainability of Aquaponics: A Review. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 83, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, H.; Li, C.; Pu, J.; Zhou, S.; Wu, Y.; Guo, F.; Xu, X.; Fan, H. The Culture of Chlorella with Livestock Wastewater and the Application of Its Oligosaccharides in Promoting Rice Seed Germination under High Salinity Conditions. Biochem. Eng. J. 2024, 209, 109399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kurniawan, S.B.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Imron, M.F.; Said, N.S.M.; Ismail, N.I.; Hasan, H.A.; Othman, A.R.; Purwanti, I.F. Challenges and Opportunities of Biocoagulant/Bioflocculant Application for Drinking Water and Wastewater Treatment and Its Potential for Sludge Recovery. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hailu, F.A.; Wakjira, M.; Getahun, A. Fishpond Wastewater Versus Chemical Fertilizer On Tomato Productivity In Jimma, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. World J. Environ. Biosci. 2018, 7, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ramadan Eid, A.; Hoballah, E.M.; Mosa, S.E.A. Sustainable Mangement of Drainage Water of Fish Farms in Agriculture as a New Source for Irrigation and Bio-Source for Fertilizing. Agric. Sci. 2014, 5, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nesan, D.; Rajantrakumar, N.K.; Chan, D.J.C. Membrane Filtration Pretreatment and Phytoremediation of Fish Farm Wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2021, 7, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Li, X.; Chen, A.; Li, Y.; Xue, M.; Feng, S. Effects of Exogenous Organic Matter on Soil Nutrient Dynamics and Its Role in Replacing Chemical Fertilizers for Vegetable Yield and Quality. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Said, N.S.M.; Kurniawan, S.B.; Daud, N.M.; Sharuddin, S.S.N.; Barakwan, R.A.; Luthfi, A.A.I. Bridging the Gap in Nutrient Management: Transitioning from Conventional to Sustainable Slow-Release Fertilizers in Modern Agriculture. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 513, 145731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Response of nutrient removal efficiency using A. graecorum for the factors studied.
Figure 1. Response of nutrient removal efficiency using A. graecorum for the factors studied.
Environments 13 00088 g001
Figure 2. Response of nutrient removal efficiency using apricot seed for the factors studied.
Figure 2. Response of nutrient removal efficiency using apricot seed for the factors studied.
Environments 13 00088 g002
Table 1. Fish farm effluent characteristics (values are presented as mean ± SD with n = 3).
Table 1. Fish farm effluent characteristics (values are presented as mean ± SD with n = 3).
ParameterTurbidityTSSpHNO3PO4
Value521 ± 26 NTU1442 ± 70 mg/L7.6 ± 0.20.19 ± 0.01 mg/L43 ± 2.1 mg/L
Table 2. Range and levels of experimental input factors.
Table 2. Range and levels of experimental input factors.
FactorNameUnitsMinimumMaximumLow (−1) *Central (0) *High (+1) *
AConcentrationmg/L10007000100040007000
BpH 59579
CSettling Timemin.1535153035
* Refers to the standardized numerical values assigned to the independent variables in the central composite design (CCD). Low (−1) represents the minimum, central (0) represents the midpoint, and high (+1) represents the maximum experimental level for each factor.
Table 3. Experimental runs for the three-factor by central composite design application.
Table 3. Experimental runs for the three-factor by central composite design application.
RunA: ConcentrationB: pHC: Settling Time
Unitmg/L minutes
17000535
21000535
37000515
44000525
51000515
61000725
74000725
84000735
94000715
107000725
111000935
127000935
137000915
144000925
151000915
Table 4. Actual observation of responses after the jar test.
Table 4. Actual observation of responses after the jar test.
PlantResponseUnitsNo. of ObservationsMinimumMaximumMean ± SD *
A. graecorumPO4 removal%1513.7298.0572.84 ± 24.51
A. graecorumNO3 removal%1557.8994.7478.89 ± 9.78
ApricotPO4 removal%153599.979.73 ± 20.03
ApricotNO3 removal%152392.6369.02 ± 16.68
* SD: standard deviation.
Table 5. Equations based on CCD for the three factors studied.
Table 5. Equations based on CCD for the three factors studied.
ResponseA. graecorum Apricot Seed
PO4 removal Quadratic   ( P O 4 = 81.53 0.394 A + 16.92 B + 10.62 C + 6.17 A B 0.1163 A C 17.3 B C + 6.02 A 2 26.08 B 2 + 6.03 C 2 ) Quadratic   ( P O 4 = 70.64 10.47 A + 1.67 B 5.4 C + 2.59 A B 6.4 A C + 1.39 B C + 25.38 A 2 + 14.62 B 2 26.37 C 2 )
NO3 removal 2 FI   ( N O 3 = 78.89 + 3.61 A + 3.45 B + 0.501 C + 3.39 A B 6.22 A C + 8.46 B C ) 2 FI   ( N O 3 = 68.02 7.15 A + 9.81 B + 1.53 C + 7.98 A B + 14.03 A C 2.45 B C )
Table 6. ANOVA data of pollutants removal efficiency (PO4 and NO3) using A. graecorum leaves and apricot seed.
Table 6. ANOVA data of pollutants removal efficiency (PO4 and NO3) using A. graecorum leaves and apricot seed.
ResponseA. graecorumApricot Seed
PO4 removalModel: p-value = 0.0074Model: p-value = 0.0278
R2 = 0.9543R2 = 0.9196
Adjusted R2 = 0.8721Adjusted R2 = 0.7749
NO3 removalModel: p-value = 0.007Model: p-value = 0.0009
R2 = 0.9151R2 = 0.9096
Adjusted R2 = 0.8513Adjusted R2 = 0.8417
Table 7. The predicted highest removal efficiency for A. graecorum and the apricot seed.
Table 7. The predicted highest removal efficiency for A. graecorum and the apricot seed.
Concentration (mg/L)pHSettling Time (min.)PO4 RemovalNO3 RemovalDesirability
A. graecorum100053586.2773.491
Apricot seed 100091592.692.630.99
Table 8. Germination Index of fertilizers produced by A. graecorum and apricot seed.
Table 8. Germination Index of fertilizers produced by A. graecorum and apricot seed.
ConcentrationsSeed Growth%Root Growth%GI%
A. graecorumApricot SeedA. graecorumApricot SeedA. graecorumApricot Seed
Control100100100100100100
2%100114291184291209
4%85114175196148223
6%1007124711424781
8%100114358162358184
10%114100369194420194
Table 9. A. graecorum and apricot seed growth testing with sludge recovery as fertilizer.
Table 9. A. graecorum and apricot seed growth testing with sludge recovery as fertilizer.
ConcentrationsA. graecorumApricot Seed
ControlEnvironments 13 00088 i001Environments 13 00088 i002
2%Environments 13 00088 i003Environments 13 00088 i004
4%Environments 13 00088 i005Environments 13 00088 i006
6%Environments 13 00088 i007Environments 13 00088 i008
8%Environments 13 00088 i009Environments 13 00088 i010
10%Environments 13 00088 i011Environments 13 00088 i012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kadhim, S.H.; Almansoory, A.F.; Al-Baldawi, I.A.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Abbas, K.F.; Imron, M.F.; Kurniawan, S.B. Optimization of Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment for Fish Farm Effluent Using Green Coagulants and Recovery of the Produced Sludge. Environments 2026, 13, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020088

AMA Style

Kadhim SH, Almansoory AF, Al-Baldawi IA, Abdullah SRS, Abbas KF, Imron MF, Kurniawan SB. Optimization of Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment for Fish Farm Effluent Using Green Coagulants and Recovery of the Produced Sludge. Environments. 2026; 13(2):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kadhim, Sajjad Hatim, Asia Fadhile Almansoory, Israa Abdulwahab Al-Baldawi, Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah, Karima F. Abbas, Muhammad Fauzul Imron, and Setyo Budi Kurniawan. 2026. "Optimization of Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment for Fish Farm Effluent Using Green Coagulants and Recovery of the Produced Sludge" Environments 13, no. 2: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020088

APA Style

Kadhim, S. H., Almansoory, A. F., Al-Baldawi, I. A., Abdullah, S. R. S., Abbas, K. F., Imron, M. F., & Kurniawan, S. B. (2026). Optimization of Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment for Fish Farm Effluent Using Green Coagulants and Recovery of the Produced Sludge. Environments, 13(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13020088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop