Understanding Well-Being in Daily Life: Informal Social Support, Depression Risk, and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Older Adults with Disabilities
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Understanding Life Satisfaction Among Older Adults with Disabilities from the Perspective of Daily Life
1.2. Informal Social Support: A Key Everyday Resource for Older Adults with Disabilities
1.3. Depression Risk: A Psychological Pathway Linking Informal Social Support and Life Satisfaction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Source and Sample
2.2. Measures
2.2.1. Informal Social Support
2.2.2. Life Satisfaction
2.2.3. Depression Risk
2.2.4. Control Variables
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Characteristics of the Sample
3.2. Correlation Analysis
3.3. Regression Analysis
3.4. Mediation Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Akosile, C. O., Mgbeojedo, U. G., Okoye, E. C., Odole, A. C., Uwakwe, R., & Ani, U. K. (2024). Social support as a correlate of depression and quality of life among Nigerian older adults: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 39, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bražinová, I., & Chytil, O. (2024). The family as a source of social support for older adults: Implications for gerontological social work. Journal of Social Work, 24, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Busseri, M. A. (2018). Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, T. (2017). A study on the influence of social support on loneliness among the elderly in China: Based on the 2014 China longitudinal aging social survey. The World of Survey and Research, 287(08), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y., Cheng, L., & Cao, H. (2024). Impact of informal social support on the mental health of older adults. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1446246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ekström, H., Dahlin Ivanoff, S., & Elmståhl, S. (2013). Does informal support influence social participation of fractured elderly people? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fors Connolly, F., & Gärling, T. (2024). What distinguishes life satisfaction from emotional wellbeing? Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1434373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gao, L. (2015). Care services and social support for the rural disabled elders. Population and Development, 21(04), 92–102. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, J., Yin, Z., Li, H., Li, X., Li, S., & Jiang, M. (2017). Analysis of loneliness status and influencing factors of disabled elderly. Chinese Nursing Researsh, 31(27), 3379–3382. [Google Scholar]
- Jain, U., & Sheehan, C. M. (2023). Comparative analysis of gender and age patterns in informal care received among disabled older adults: A cross-national study across the United States, Mexico, China, and Indonesia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 38, 389–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jia, Q., Duan, Y., Gong, R., Jiang, M., You, D., & Qu, Y. (2023). Living arrangements and depression of the older adults- evidence from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. BMC Public Health, 23, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jiang, C., Chow, J. C.-C., Zhou, L., Song, H., & Shi, J. (2024). Community support, social isolation and older adults’ life satisfaction: Evidence from a national survey in China. Aging & Mental Health, 28, 849–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jovanović, V., & Joshanloo, M. (2022). The contribution of positive and negative affect to life satisfaction across age. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Keyes, H., Gradidge, S., Forwood, S. E., Gibson, N., Harvey, A., Kis, E., Mutsatsa, K., Ownsworth, R., Roeloffs, S., & Zawisza, M. (2024). Creating arts and crafting positively predicts subjective wellbeing. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1417997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liao, M., Zhang, X., Xie, Z., Li, L., & Zou, L. (2024). The mediating effect of life satisfaction between daily living abilities and depressive symptoms in the Chinese older people: Evidence from CHARLS 2020. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1393530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y., An, S., Song, Q., & Chen, C. (2018). Correlation between loneliness and family social support of advanced age disabled elderly in Tangshan city. Chinese Nursing Research, 32(07), 1057–1060. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, S., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. (2024). Social support level and influencing factors of disabled elderly in Urumqi. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine, 41(01), 83–87. [Google Scholar]
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, C. (2024). Shanghai’s experience in strengthening social support for families with disabled elderly people. Prosecutorial View, 712(20), 9–11. [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 289–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, L. (2013). A study on social support of rural disabled eiders—Based on the case interview in hunan province [Master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology]. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W., Zhao, M., Wang, F., Xiao, W., He, J., Ma, X., & Qiao, H. (2026). Association between depression and subjective well-being among older adults in China: The mediating effect of self-assessed health. BMC Public Health, 26, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wild, T., Willroth, E. C., & English, T. (2025). Social interactions and loneliness in daily life: A study of younger adults and cognitively diverse older adults. Developmental Psychology, 62(7), 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wilk, P., Ruiz-Castell, M., Stranges, S., Bohn, T., Fagherazzi, G., Nicholson, K., Moran, V., Makovski, T. T., Pi Alperin, M. N., Zeegers, M. P., & Samouda, H. (2024). Relationship between multimorbidity, functional limitation, and quality of life among middle-aged and older adults: Findings from the longitudinal analysis of the 2013–2020 Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Quality of Life Research, 33, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H., Xu, H., & Luo, Y. (2025). The disability levels and characteristics of the elderly population in China: Assessment and prediction based on Multiple Data Sources. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 18(8), 1–9. [Google Scholar]


| Category | Subcategory | N | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 215 | 42.24% |
| Female | 294 | 57.76% | |
| Household Registration Type | Agricultural | 379 | 74.46% |
| Non-Agricultural | 130 | 25.54% | |
| Place of Residence | Rural | 349 | 68.57% |
| Urban | 160 | 31.43% | |
| Marital Status | Unmarried, Living Apart, Divorced, Widowed | 139 | 27.31% |
| Married but Living Apart | 9 | 1.77% | |
| Married and Cohabiting | 361 | 70.92% | |
| Education Level | Junior High School or Below | 468 | 91.94% |
| Technical Secondary School or High School | 31 | 6.09% | |
| College Degree or Above | 10 | 1.96% | |
| Instrumental Support | 0 = No caregiver | 51 | 10.02% |
| 1 = 1–2 caregivers | 312 | 61.30% | |
| 2 = 3–4 caregivers | 72 | 14.15% | |
| 3 = 5–6 caregivers | 36 | 7.07% | |
| 4 = 7 or more caregivers | 38 | 7.47% | |
| Emotional Support | 0 = No participation | 332 | 65.23% |
| 1 = Score of 1–2 | 97 | 19.06% | |
| 2 = Score of 3–4 | 66 | 12.97% | |
| 3 = Score of 5–6 | 12 | 2.36% | |
| 4 = Score of 7–8 | 2 | 0.39% | |
| Informal Social Support | log[(Instrumental Support Score+ Emotional Support Score) + 1] | 509 | 100% |
| Life Satisfaction | Not at All Satisfied | 41 | 8.06% |
| Not Very Satisfied | 75 | 14.73% | |
| Somewhat Satisfied | 225 | 44.20% | |
| Very Satisfied | 144 | 28.29% | |
| Completely Satisfied | 24 | 4.72% | |
| Depression Risk | No Depression Risk | 150 | 29.47% |
| Have Depression Risk | 359 | 70.53% |
| Variables | Informal Social Support | Life Satisfaction | Depression Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Informal Social Support | 1 | ||
| Life Satisfaction | 0.1173 * | 1 | |
| Depression Risk | −0.0782 | −0.2792 * | 1 |
| Explanatory Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | |
| Gender (Male = 0) | ||||
| Female | 0.275 | 0.114 | 0.222 | 0.207 |
| Household Registration Status (Agricultural = 0) | ||||
| Non-agricultural | 0.100 | 0.635 | 0.118 | 0.573 |
| Educational Attainment | −0.089 | 0.720 | −0.073 | 0.771 |
| Place of Residence (Rural = 0) | ||||
| Urban | −0.219 | 0.293 | −0.221 | 0.291 |
| Age | 0.046 *** | 0.001 | 0.045 *** | 0.001 |
| Marital Status (Unmarried, Living Apart, Divorced, Widowed = 0) | ||||
| Married but Living Apart | 0.516 | 0.430 | 0.583 | 0.417 |
| Married and Cohabiting | −0.043 | 0.837 | −0.009 | 0.996 |
| Informal Social Support | 0.477 * | 0.018 | ||
| N | 509 | 509 | ||
| R2 | 0.014 | 0.019 | ||
| Explanatory Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | |
| Gender (Male = 0) | ||||
| Female | 0.560 ** | 0.007 | 0.621 ** | 0.003 |
| Household Registration Status (Agricultural = 0) | ||||
| Non-agricultural | −0.273 | 0.319 | −0.280 | 0.31 |
| Educational Attainment | −0.293 | 0.296 | −0.316 | 0.261 |
| Place of Residence (Rural = 0) | ||||
| Urban | −0.048 | 0.852 | −0.058 | 0.822 |
| Age | −0.040 * | 0.01 | −0.039 * | 0.012 |
| Marital Status (Unmarried, Living Apart, Divorced, Widowed = 0) | ||||
| Married but Living Apart | 0.121 | 0.886 | 0.127 | 0.884 |
| Married and Cohabiting | 0.035 | 0.886 | 0.016 | 0.949 |
| Informal Social Support | −0.499 * | 0.036 | ||
| N | 509 | 509 | ||
| R2 | 0.036 | 0.043 | ||
| Explanatory Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | |
| Gender (Male = 0) | ||||
| Female | 0.427 * | 0.014 | 0.380 * | 0.032 |
| Household Registration Status (Agricultural = 0) | ||||
| Non-agricultural | 0.068 | 0.648 | 0.085 | 0.704 |
| Educational Attainment | −0.176 | 0.432 | −0.159 | 0.484 |
| Place of Residence (Rural = 0) | ||||
| Urban | −0.273 | 0.215 | −0.276 | 0.211 |
| Age | 0.038 ** | 0.004 | 0.038 ** | 0.004 |
| Marital Status (Unmarried, Living Apart, Divorced, Widowed = 0) | ||||
| Married but Living Apart | 0.527 | 0.510 | 0.571 | 0.491 |
| Married and Cohabiting | −0.055 | 0.798 | −0.028 | 0.896 |
| Depression Risk | −1.211 *** | 0.000 | −1.183 *** | 0.000 |
| Informal Social Support | 0.385 | 0.059 | ||
| N | 509 | 509 | ||
| R2 | 0.045 | 0.048 | ||
| Effect | Estimate | SE | 95% CI Lower | 95% CI Upper | Relative Effect (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect Effect | 0.1165 | 0.0572 | 0.0043 | 0.2286 | 23.25% |
| Direct Effect | 0.3845 | 0.2036 | −0.0144 | 0.7835 | 76.75% |
| Total Effect | 0.5010 | 0.2031 | 0.1029 | 0.8991 | 100.00% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, W.; Chen, S.; Chen, G. Understanding Well-Being in Daily Life: Informal Social Support, Depression Risk, and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Older Adults with Disabilities. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071216
Wang X, Zhang C, Xu W, Chen S, Chen G. Understanding Well-Being in Daily Life: Informal Social Support, Depression Risk, and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Older Adults with Disabilities. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(7):1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071216
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Xinzhe, Chenrui Zhang, Wenhu Xu, Shiyu Chen, and Gong Chen. 2026. "Understanding Well-Being in Daily Life: Informal Social Support, Depression Risk, and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Older Adults with Disabilities" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 7: 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071216
APA StyleWang, X., Zhang, C., Xu, W., Chen, S., & Chen, G. (2026). Understanding Well-Being in Daily Life: Informal Social Support, Depression Risk, and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Older Adults with Disabilities. Behavioral Sciences, 16(7), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071216
