Next Article in Journal
Shielding Against Information Overload in the Post-Pandemic Era: The Protective Chain of Family Cohesion, Mindfulness, and Lower Anxiety
Previous Article in Journal
AI in the Coach’s Chair: How Professional Coaches Navigate Identity and Role Ambiguity in Response to AI Adoption by Their Coaching Firm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sorry, Am I Intruding? Comparing Performance and Intrusion Rates for Pretested and Posttested Information
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications

by
Lindsey Engle Richland
1,* and
Hongyang Zhao
2
1
School of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
2
Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020210 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 June 2025 / Revised: 16 January 2026 / Accepted: 22 January 2026 / Published: 31 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Educational Applications of Cognitive Psychology)

Abstract

As the global economy and sociopolitical, technological, climate, and international trade contexts continue to shift rapidly, educational goals and aims for skilled employment are changing accordingly. Research on the cognition of relational reasoning provides insight into training youth to handle these types of complex systems and multi-faceted problems. Relational reasoning is the ability to make inferences from the relationships within and between mental representations, and grounds many higher order cognitive actions such as generating solutions to novel problems, transferring insights from one context to another, and making creative leaps of inference that are central to these societal aims. This article synthesizes the theoretical and foundational literature to highlight specific practices that are relevant and implementable in enhancing all students’ access to rich and complex thinking and reasoning skills. These include strategies for training students to notice and attend to relational correspondences, to use visual stimuli and language to draw connections, and to reduce the cognitive resources required to do so.
Keywords: relational reasoning; analogy; learning relational reasoning; analogy; learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Richland, L.E.; Zhao, H. Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications. Behav. Sci. 2026, 16, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020210

AMA Style

Richland LE, Zhao H. Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications. Behavioral Sciences. 2026; 16(2):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Richland, Lindsey Engle, and Hongyang Zhao. 2026. "Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications" Behavioral Sciences 16, no. 2: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020210

APA Style

Richland, L. E., & Zhao, H. (2026). Relational Reasoning and Educational Applications. Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop