Emotional Attitude to Own Appearance and Appearance of the Spouse: Analysis of Relationships with the Relationship of Spouses to Themselves, Others, and the World
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Present Study
2.1. The Goals and Objectives of the Present Study
2.2. Hypotheses
2.3. Procedure
2.4. Methods
2.5. Statistics
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of the Relationship of Attitudes toward Own AP and AP of the Partner with the Attitude of the Spouses toward Themselves, Other Persons, and the World
3.2. Comparative Analysis of Emotional Attitude to Own AP and AP of the Spouse in Registered and Unregistered Marriages
3.3. Analysis of Interrelations of Attitudes to Own AP and AP of the Spouse
4. Discussion
4.1. Limitations
4.2. Practical Implications
Availability of Data and Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Labunskaya, V.A.; Drozdova, I.I. A Theoretical and empirical analysis of the influence of socio-psychological factors on young people’s assessment and self-assessment of appearance. Rus. Psychol. J. 2017, 14, 202–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gui, T. «Devalued» Daughters Versus «Appreciated» Sons: Gender Inequality in China’s Parent-Organized Matchmaking Markets. J. Fam. Issues 2017, 38, 1923–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zajonc, R.B.; Adelmann, P.K.; Murphy, S.T.; Niedenthal, P.M. Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motiv. Emot. 1987, 11, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karapetyan, L.V.; Zhiltsova, Y.V. Study of family values of married couples. Psychol. Bull. Ural State Uni. 2009, 7, 85–93. [Google Scholar]
- Tverdostup, K.G. The system of family values of spouses as a factor of satisfaction with marriage. Sci. Mod. 2014, 33, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
- Evtukh, T.V. Satisfaction with marriage and assortativeness of spouses in groups with different marriage experience. Bull. Perm State Humanit. Pedagog. University. Ser. No. 1. Psychol. Pedagog. Sci. 2016, 1, 4–10. [Google Scholar]
- Ivanchenko, V.A.; Shchepina, V.V. Psychological features of spouses experiencing certain crisis stages in the family development. Sib. Pedagog. Mag. 2014, 6, 162–166. [Google Scholar]
- Ma-Kellams, C.; Wang, M.C.; Cardiel, H. Attractiveness and relationship longevity: Beauty is not what it is cracked up to be. Pers. Relatsh. 2017, 24, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNulty, J.K.; Neff, L.A.; Karney, B.R. Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage. J. Fam. Psych. 2008, 22, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alirezaei, S.; Ozgoli, G.; Majd, H.A. Evaluation of Factors Associated with Sexual Function in Infertile Women. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 12, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pournaghash-Tehrani, S. Role of Beliefs, Attitudes and Adverse Childhood Experiences in Predicting Men’s Reactions Towards Their Spouses’ Violence. J. Fam. V. 2011, 26, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, K.; Damhorst, M.L. Coorientation of body image among older married couples. Bod. Image 2009, 6, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lezhnina, Y.P. The institution of the family in Russia: On the way of transformation. Sociol. Sci. Soc. P. 2016, 2, 70–90. [Google Scholar]
- Heuveline, P.; Timberlake, J.M. The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. J. Marriage Fam. 2004, 66, 1214–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Myasishchev, V.N. Psych. Relationships; MPSI Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Shkurko, T.A.; Lomova, M.A. Social-psychological needs and the relationship to the appearance of partners, consisting in registered and unregistered marriage. Psych. Psychotechnology 2017, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sermyagina, O.S.; Etkind, A.M. Color attitudes test in family psychodiagnostics. Q. Psych. 1991, 3, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
- Sobchik, L.N. Method of interpersonal relationships diagnostics (IRD). Sch. Psychol. 2003, 5, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
- Schutz, W. FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior; Rinehart: New York, NY, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- Rukavishnikov, A.A. Interpersonal relationship questionnaire; Publishing House “Kogito-Center”: Moscow, Russia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Bereczkei, T.; Gyuris, P.; Koves, P.; Bernath, L. Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences. Personal. Individ. Diff. 2002, 33, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bale, C.; Archer, J. Self-Perceived Attractiveness, Romantic Desirability and Self-Esteem: A Mating Sociometer Perspective. Evolutionary Psycho. 2013, 11, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liechty, T.; Yarnal, C.M. Older women’s body image: A lifecourse perspective. Ageing Socie. 2010, 30, 1197–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labunskaya, V.A.; Serikov, G.V. Theoretical foundations and methodological approaches to the study of the phenomenon the “Value of appearance”. Soc. Psych. Socie. 2018, 9, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dimension | Variables | Attitude of Women to Their AP | Attitude of Women to the Spouse’s AP |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment of components of own AP | Assessment of own bodily structure | 0.312 */0.024 | 0.124/0.381 |
Assessment of own AP development | 0.391 **/ 0.004 | 0.134/0.342 | |
Assessment of expressive behavior | 0.483 **/0.000 | 0.228/0.104 | |
Degree of acceptance of own reflected AP | 0.289 */0.038 | 0.029/0.840 | |
Assessment of AP conformity to gender | 0.336 */0.015 | 0.271/0.052 | |
Assessment of AP compliance with gender roles | 0.014/0.924 | 0.432 **/0.001 | |
Integral assessment of own AP | 0.308 */0.026 | 0.119/0.401 | |
Expressiveness of social needs | Need for inclusion in social groups (required behavior) | 0.536 **/0.000 | 0.202/0.152 |
Types of interpersonal relationships | Dominating and leading | 0.293 */0.035 | 0.202/0.152 |
Collaborative and conventional | 0.206/0.144 | 0.379 **/0.006 | |
Responsible and generous | 0.219/0.119 | 0.279 */0.045 | |
Emotional attitudes toward oneself, other persons, important phenomena and concepts | Attitude toward civil marriage | 0.299 */0.031 | 0.211/0.134 |
Attitude toward registered marriage | −0.124/0.382 | 0.280 */0.045 | |
Attitude to own personality | 0.438**/0.001 | 0.026/0.854 | |
Attitude toward the husband | 0.079/0.580 | 0.576 **/0.000 | |
Attitude toward the children | 0.294 */0.034 | −0.034/0.813 |
Dimension | Variables | Men’s Attitude toward Own AP | Attitude of Men to AP of the Spouse |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment of components of own AP | Assessment of own face | 0.032/0.821 | 0.304 */0.028 |
Assessment of own bodily structure | −0.020/0.891 | 0.566 **/0.000 | |
Integral assessment of own AP | 0.060/0.672 | 0.296 */0.033 | |
Expressiveness of social needs | Need to love | 0.181/0.199 | −0.301 */0.030 |
Need to be loved | 0.316 */0.023 | −0.010/0.943 | |
Emotional attitudes toward oneself, other persons, important phenomena and concepts | Attitude to the family | −0.115/0.415 | 0.338*/0.014 |
Attitude to own personality | 0.310 */0.025 | 0.134/0.345 | |
Attitude toward the wife | 0.181/0.199 | 0.668 **/0.000 | |
Attitude toward love | −0.184/0.191 | 0.503 **/0.000 | |
Attitude toward the mother | −0.153/0.280 | 0.275 */0.048 |
Variable | Means/Standard Deviations (Group 1) | Means/Standard Deviations (Group 2) | Z Statistics | P-Value | Average Rank of Group 1 (Registered Marriage) | Average Rank of Group 2 (Unregistered Marriage) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women | ||||||
Own AP | 5.77/2.55 | 7.19/1.06 | −1.938 | 0.05 * | 22.65 | 30.35 |
Husband’s AP | 5.65/1.83 | 5.81/1.70 | −0.206 | 0.84 | 26.08 | 26.92 |
Men | ||||||
Own AP | 6.27/2.22 | 6.77/1.99 | −1.231 | 0.22 | 24.15 | 28.85 |
Wife’s AP | 6.50/1.73 | 5.77/1.53 | −2.009 | 0.05 * | 30.62 | 22.38 |
Variable | Criterion Value | P-Value | Average Rank of Group 1 (Marriage Duration from 0.5 to 10 Years) | Average Rank of Group 2 (Marriage Duration from 11 to 20 Years) | Average Rank of Group 3 (Marriage Duration from 21 to 30 Years) | Means/Standard Deviations (Group 1) | Means/Standard Deviations (Group 2) | Means/Standard Deviations (Group 3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women in a registered marriage | ||||||||
Own AP | 9.345 | 0.009 ** | 17.00 | 8.40 | 7.40 | 7.06/1.73 | 4.20/1.79 | 3.20/2.86 |
Men in a registered marriage | ||||||||
Partner’s AP | 1.036 | 0.596 | 13.66 | 10.90 | 15.60 | 6.50/1.83 | 6.00/1.87 | 7.00/1.41 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vorontsova, T.A.; Labunskaya, V.A. Emotional Attitude to Own Appearance and Appearance of the Spouse: Analysis of Relationships with the Relationship of Spouses to Themselves, Others, and the World. Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10020044
Vorontsova TA, Labunskaya VA. Emotional Attitude to Own Appearance and Appearance of the Spouse: Analysis of Relationships with the Relationship of Spouses to Themselves, Others, and the World. Behavioral Sciences. 2020; 10(2):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10020044
Chicago/Turabian StyleVorontsova, Tatyana A., and Vera A. Labunskaya. 2020. "Emotional Attitude to Own Appearance and Appearance of the Spouse: Analysis of Relationships with the Relationship of Spouses to Themselves, Others, and the World" Behavioral Sciences 10, no. 2: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10020044
APA StyleVorontsova, T. A., & Labunskaya, V. A. (2020). Emotional Attitude to Own Appearance and Appearance of the Spouse: Analysis of Relationships with the Relationship of Spouses to Themselves, Others, and the World. Behavioral Sciences, 10(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10020044