Next Article in Journal
A Novel Protocol to Assess Acclimation Rate in Bos taurus Heifers during Yard Weaning
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of a Mechanical Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Device for the Euthanasia of Neonate Lambs
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Animals 2018, 8(4), 50;

Objecthood, Agency and Mutualism in Valenced Farm Animal Environments

CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Armidale 2350, Australia
Received: 29 November 2017 / Revised: 8 March 2018 / Accepted: 2 April 2018 / Published: 3 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [256 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |   Review Reports


Genetic selection of farm animals for productivity, and intensification of farming practices have yielded substantial improvements in efficiency; however, the capacity of animals to cope with environmental challenges has diminished. Understanding how the animal and environment interact is central to efforts to improve the health, fitness, and welfare of animals through breeding and management strategies. The review examines aspects of the environment that are sensed by the animal. The predictive brain model of sensory perception and motor action (the Bayesian brain model) and its recent extension to account for anticipatory, predictive control of physiological activities is described. Afferent sensory input from the immune system, and induction of predictive immune functions by the efferent nervous system are also in accord with the Bayesian brain model. In this model, expected sensory input (from external, physiological and immunological environments) is reconciled with actual sensory input through behavioural, physiological and immune actions, and through updating future expectations. Sustained discrepancy between expected and actual sensory inputs occurs when environmental encounters cannot be predicted and controlled resulting in stress and negative affective states. Through these processes, from the animal’s perspective, aspects of the environment acquire a negative or positive character: that is the environment becomes valenced. In a homeostatic manner, affective experience guides the animal towards synchronisation and a greater degree of mutualism with its environment. A better understanding of the dynamic among environmental valence, animal affect and mutualism may provide a better understanding of genetic and phenotypic links between temperament, immune function, metabolic performance, affective state, and resilience in farm animals, and provide further opportunities to improve their welfare. View Full-Text
Keywords: agency; homeostasis; allostasis; mutualism; resilience; immune function; flight speed agency; homeostasis; allostasis; mutualism; resilience; immune function; flight speed
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Colditz, I.G. Objecthood, Agency and Mutualism in Valenced Farm Animal Environments. Animals 2018, 8, 50.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top