16S rRNA Gene and Metagenomic Analysis Revealed an Association Between Cecal Microbiota and Pork Umami
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
2.2. Taste-Sensing Electronic Tongue System Sample Preparation, Measurement and Sample Grouping
2.3. 16S rRNA Gene Library Construction, Quality Control, and Sequencing
2.4. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Data Analysis
2.5. Metagenomic Library Construction and Sequencing
2.6. Metagenomic Data Processing and Functional Analysis
3. Results
3.1. 16S rRNA Gene Analysis Reveals the Composition of the Cecal Microbiota and the Species Related to Umami
3.2. Functional Analysis of Metagenomes in Different Umami Groups
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Toldrá, F.; Reig, M.; Mora, L. Management of meat by- and co-products for an improved meat processing sustainability. Meat Sci. 2021, 181, 108608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, W.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y. Characterization and evaluation of umami taste: A review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 127, 115876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, Z.; Bai, Y.; Bo, D.; Feng, Y.; Shen, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Bai, Y. A review of taste-active compounds in meat: Identification, influencing factors, and taste transduction mechanism. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 8128–8155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ngapo, T.; Vachon, L. Umami and related components in “chilled” pork for the Japanese market. Meat Sci. 2016, 121, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, Y.-H.; Ismail, I.; Joo, S.-T. Identification of umami taste in sous-vide beef by chemical analyses, equivalent umami concentration, and electronic tongue system. Foods 2020, 9, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, M.D.; Hunt, I.G.; Sawyer, S.M.; Kocharunchitt, C.; Li, Z.; Stanley, R.A. Electronic tongue measurements as a predictor for sensory properties of vacuum-packed minced beef–A preliminary study. Meat Sci. 2025, 220, 109705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Lyu, W.; Hong, Q.; Zhang, X.; Yang, H.; Xiao, Y. Gut microbiota influence lipid metabolism of skeletal muscle in pigs. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 675445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, L.; Li, K.; Li, Z.; Huang, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Di, S.; Cui, S.; Xu, Y. Investigation into Critical Gut Microbes Influencing Intramuscular Fat Deposition in Min Pigs. Animals 2024, 14, 3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Jin, C.; Wu, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Gut microbiota and metabolites in lipid metabolism and intramuscular fat deposition: Mechanisms and implications for meat quality. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2025, 16, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Q.; Huang, X.; Yan, F.; Yin, J.; Xiao, Y. The role of gut microbiota in the skeletal muscle development and fat deposition in pigs. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Sun, G.; Luo, C.; Duan, J.; Shi, B.; Ma, T.; Tang, S.; Zhong, R.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H. Different feeding patterns affect meat quality of Tibetan pigs associated with intestinal microbiota alterations. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1076123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, S.; Xiong, X.; Su, Y.; Huang, L.; Chen, C. 16S rRNA gene-based association study identified microbial taxa associated with pork intramuscular fat content in feces and cecum lumen. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, Y.; He, J.; Li, M.; Peng, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Deng, F. Unlocking the Potential of Metagenomics with the PacBio High-Fidelity Sequencing Technology. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wensel, C.R.; Pluznick, J.L.; Salzberg, S.L.; Sears, C.L. Next-generation sequencing: Insights to advance clinical investigations of the microbiome. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e154944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quince, C.; Walker, A.W.; Simpson, J.T.; Loman, N.J.; Segata, N. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Han, Y.; Li, M.; Peng, Y.; Chai, J.; Yang, G.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J. HiFi based metagenomic assembly strategy provides accuracy near isolated genome resolution in MAG assembly. iMetaOmics 2025, 2, e70041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Y.; Mao, Y.; Read, T.D.; Fedirko, V.; Satten, G.A.; Chen, X.; Zhan, X.; Hu, Y.-J. Integrative Analysis of Microbial 16S Gene and Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing Data Improves Statistical Efficiency in Testing Differential Abundance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2025, 120, 2102–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.; Gao, P.; Li, R.; Tan, P.; Xie, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, J. Multicenter assessment of microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 26, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, W.; Huang, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, R.; Fayyaz, S.; Zhang, S.; Qin, Y.-h. Integrated 16S rRNA sequencing, metagenomics, and metabolomics to characterize gut microbial composition, function, and fecal metabolic phenotype in non-obese type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amir, A.; McDonald, D.; Navas-Molina, J.A.; Kopylova, E.; Morton, J.T.; Zech Xu, Z.; Kightley, E.P.; Thompson, L.R.; Hyde, E.R.; Gonzalez, A. Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. MSystems 2017, 2, e00191-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruskal, W.H.; Wallis, W.A. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1952, 47, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmieder, R.; Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 863–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Liu, C.-M.; Luo, R.; Sadakane, K.; Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1674–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyatt, D.; Chen, G.-L.; LoCascio, P.F.; Land, M.L.; Larimer, F.W.; Hauser, L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, L.; Niu, B.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, S.; Li, W. CD-HIT: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 3150–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patro, R.; Duggal, G.; Love, M.I.; Irizarry, R.A.; Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 417–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khanal, P.; Maltecca, C.; Schwab, C.; Fix, J.; Tiezzi, F. Microbiability of meat quality and carcass composition traits in swine. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2021, 138, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maltecca, C.; Dunn, R.; He, Y.; McNulty, N.P.; Schillebeeckx, C.; Schwab, C.; Shull, C.; Fix, J.; Tiezzi, F. Microbial composition differs between production systems and is associated with growth performance and carcass quality in pigs. Anim. Microbiome 2021, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Du, M.; Wei, S.; Zhu, L.; Yan, R.; Jin, M.; Wang, Y. Variation of Meat Quality and Relationship to Gut Microbiota Among Different Pig Breeds. Microb. Biotechnol. 2025, 18, e70139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Li, P.; Hou, L.; Niu, Q.; Pu, G.; Wang, B.; Du, T.; Kim, S.W.; Niu, P.; Li, Q. Metagenomic analysis reveals new microbiota related to fiber digestion in pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 746717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.; Liang, Y.; Ji, K.; Feng, M.; Du, X.; Jiao, D.; Wu, X.; Zhong, C.; Cong, H.; Yang, G. Enhanced propionate and butyrate metabolism in cecal microbiota contributes to cold-stress adaptation in sheep. Microbiome 2025, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holman, D.B.; Kommadath, A.; Tingley, J.P.; Abbott, D.W. Novel Insights into the Pig Gut Microbiome Using Metagenome-Assembled Genomes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e02380–02322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, B.; Lin, X.; Jing, X.; Hu, T.; Zhou, J.; Chen, J.; Xiao, L.; Wang, B.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J. A bacterial genome and culture collection of gut microbial in weanling piglet. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e02417–e02421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirete, S.; Sánchez-Costa, M.; Díaz-Rullo, J.; González de Figueras, C.; Martínez-Rodríguez, P.; González-Pastor, J.E. Metagenome-Assembled Genomes (MAGs): Advances, Challenges, and Ecological Insights. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, H.; Xiong, X.; Fang, S.; Jiang, H.; Wu, J.; Yang, H.; Gao, J.; Huang, L. Expanded catalog of microbial genes and metagenome-assembled genomes from the pig gut microbiome. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Feng, B.; Zhang, Z.; Miao, J.; Lai, X.; Zhao, W.; Xie, Q.; Ye, X.; Cao, C.; Yu, P.; et al. UPGG: Expanding the taxonomic and functional diversity of the pig gut microbiome with an enhanced genome catalog. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2025, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Z.; Wen, M.; Tang, C.; Chen, S.; Tang, D.; Zhang, J.; Sun, J.; Ge, L.; Long, K.; Lu, L. Gut microbiota orchestrates skeletal muscle development and metabolism in germ-free and SPF pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1615884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harling, L.C.; Hecht, A.L.; Meyer, F.; Wu, G.D. Revisiting nitrogen assimilation strategies in the mammalian gut: Lessons from Enterobacteriaceae as pathobiont models and a challenge to the limitation paradigm. Arch. Microbiol. 2025, 207, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, H.J.; Scott, K.P.; Louis, P.; Duncan, S.H. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 9, 577–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, M.S.; Ijssennagger, N.; Kies, A.K.; van Mil, S.W.C. Protein fermentation in the gut; implications for intestinal dysfunction in humans, pigs, and poultry. Am. J. Physiol. -Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2018, 315, G159–G170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Wang, C.; Li, D.; Peng, Y.; Deng, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, M.; Wu, K.; Zhao, J.; et al. The unique gut microbiome of giant pandas involved in protein metabolism contributes to the host’s dietary adaption to bamboo. Microbiome 2023, 11, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, R.; Berrocoso, J.F.D. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: A review. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2016, 212, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neis, E.P.J.G.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Rensen, S.S. The Role of Microbial Amino Acid Metabolism in Host Metabolism. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2930–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ducker, G.S.; Rabinowitz, J.D. One-Carbon Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peled, S.; Livney, Y.D. The role of dietary proteins and carbohydrates in gut microbiome composition and activity: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamaguchi, S.; Ninomiya, K. Umami and Food Palatability. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 921S–926S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- den Besten, G.; van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.-J.; Bakker, B.M. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koh, A.; De Vadder, F.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Bäckhed, F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell 2016, 165, 1332–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Xu, Z.; Liang, M.; Li, J.; Song, B.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, H.; Chai, J.; Zhao, J.; Deng, F.; Li, Y. 16S rRNA Gene and Metagenomic Analysis Revealed an Association Between Cecal Microbiota and Pork Umami. Animals 2026, 16, 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040679
Xu Z, Liang M, Li J, Song B, Zhang M, Jiang H, Chai J, Zhao J, Deng F, Li Y. 16S rRNA Gene and Metagenomic Analysis Revealed an Association Between Cecal Microbiota and Pork Umami. Animals. 2026; 16(4):679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040679
Chicago/Turabian StyleXu, Zhijian, Mei Liang, Junjie Li, Bo Song, Meimei Zhang, Hui Jiang, Jianmin Chai, Jiangchao Zhao, Feilong Deng, and Ying Li. 2026. "16S rRNA Gene and Metagenomic Analysis Revealed an Association Between Cecal Microbiota and Pork Umami" Animals 16, no. 4: 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040679
APA StyleXu, Z., Liang, M., Li, J., Song, B., Zhang, M., Jiang, H., Chai, J., Zhao, J., Deng, F., & Li, Y. (2026). 16S rRNA Gene and Metagenomic Analysis Revealed an Association Between Cecal Microbiota and Pork Umami. Animals, 16(4), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040679

