Next Article in Journal
Multi-Organ Transcriptomic Analysis of Greater Amberjack (Seriola dumerili) with Different Growth Rates
Previous Article in Journal
The Period (per) Gene Plays an Important Role in Regulating Circadian Oscillation and Ovarian Development in the Ridgetail White Prawn, Exopalaemon carinicauda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gastric and Small-Intestinal Morphological Remodeling After Intragastric Apelin-13 Administration in Unweaned Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 16
Issue 3
10.3390/ani16030515
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hepatic Expression of Growth Hormone Receptor (GHrec) and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) Genes and Cellular Location of IGF-I mRNA in Diploid and Triploid Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Undergoing Parr–Smolt Transformation

by
Martina Bortoletti
1,†,
Elisa Fonsatti
1,†,
Lisa Maccatrozzo
1,
Stefano Peruzzi
2,
Malcolm Jobling
2,
Marta Vascellari
3,
Giuseppe Radaelli
1,* and
Daniela Bertotto
1
1
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
2
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
3
Department of Histopathology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2026, 16(3), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030515
Submission received: 10 December 2025 / Revised: 12 January 2026 / Accepted: 2 February 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Veterinary Anatomy: Connecting Basic Research with Clinical, Biotechnological, and Educational Innovations)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Farmed Atlantic salmon are made sterile to prevent them from breeding with wild fish if they escape. These sterile fish, called triploids, may have different needs than normal salmon. One of the most delicate stages in a salmon’s life is the transition from freshwater to seawater, known as smoltification. If this process is not well timed, fish may struggle with growth, health, and survival after they are moved to the sea. In this study, we examined whether triploids and normal salmon differ in how their livers respond during this transition. We also tested whether a diet containing hydrolyzed fish proteins influences this response. We measured two genes in the liver that help control growth and help the fish adapt to salty water, and we also looked at where signals from one of these genes appear inside liver cells. We found no major differences between triploids and normal salmon, and the diet had no effect. Instead, both groups showed clear natural changes as smoltification progressed. These findings suggest that triploid salmon cope with this life stage in the same way as normal fish and that these genes could help identify the best moment to move fish to the sea.

Abstract

The induction of triploidy, a strategy to mitigate unwanted pre-harvest sexual maturation and a genetic containment measure for escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), may give rise to challenges because of the distinct environmental and dietary requirements of sterile triploid fish. Smoltification is a critical phase in the life cycle of Atlantic salmon, so knowledge about parr–smolt transformation in triploids is important for the salmon farming industry. This study covered an investigation of hepatic expression of growth hormone receptor (GHrec) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) genes, both of which are intimately involved in the regulation of osmoregulation and growth. Additionally, hepatic presence and location of IGF-I mRNA were examined using RNAscope®, an advanced in situ hybridization technique. Triplicate groups of juvenile diploid and triploid salmon were reared at low temperature (10 °C) and fed either a standard diet or one enriched with hydrolyzed fish proteins from the start of feeding onwards. Liver samples were collected from three fish per tank each month from October to December (2454–3044 degree-days post-start feeding), the period encompassing smoltification, and hepatic expression of IGF-I and GHrec genes was quantified by real-time PCR. The results indicated that neither ploidy nor diet significantly influenced IGF-I or GHrec gene expression, suggesting that, under our conditions, triploidy and diet did not adversely affect this molecular pathway linked to growth and osmoregulation. IGF-I gene expression exhibited significant temporal variation, correlating with the progression of smoltification, while GHrec gene expression showed a similar, albeit non-significant, trend. Triploids exhibited IGF-I and GHrec gene expression patterns comparable to diploids, and both the temporal changes and lack of difference between triploids and diploids were mirrored in the quantification of IGF-I mRNA within the liver cells. The potential applicability to a commercial aquaculture setting requires further investigation.

1. Introduction

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) farming is a significant part of the global aquaculture industry, with production reaching approximately 2.87 million metric tons in 2023 [1]. Norway maintains its position as the world’s leading producer, contributing substantially to the European aquaculture sector, which generates over €2.5 billion in value from Atlantic salmon alone [2]. Nevertheless, the Atlantic salmon farming industry continues to face significant challenges, including high mortality that sometimes occurs shortly after the transfer of the fish from freshwater to the sea [3,4].
The parr–smolt transformation, also known as smoltification, is a critical process in the life cycle of Atlantic salmon, significantly impacting performance, welfare, and survival. It involves morphological, physiological, and behavioral changes that enable young salmon (parr) to transform into smolts that can survive and grow in the marine environment [5]. Smolts develop silver skin pigmentation and a streamlined body [5,6], and they are characterized by increased metabolic rate, enhanced seawater tolerance, and alterations in lipid metabolism compared to parr [7]. Behavioral changes include downstream movement and the loss of territorial behavior [6,8,9].
The parr–smolt transformation is orchestrated by an interplay of hormones, primarily growth hormone (GH), cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) [5,10], and it is influenced by environmental cues such as photoperiod and temperature [11,12,13]. The physiological effects of GH are mediated through its transmembrane receptor (GHrec), which activates intracellular signaling pathways regulating growth, metabolism, and osmoregulatory processes in target tissues, with the liver representing a primary site of action [14,15]. Environmental cues trigger hypothalamus-mediated GH secretion from the pituitary gland, which stimulates IGF-I synthesis and secretion. IGF-I production is highest in the liver and may be elevated after seawater adaptation [16]. IGF-I acts as a key mediator of GH action by promoting growth and metabolic regulation and plays an important role during smoltification in coordination with other endocrine factors [17,18]. GH and cortisol initiate long-term adaptations to the new osmotic environment, while IGF-I promotes the hyperplasia and hypertrophy of transporting cells and vasculature in osmoregulatory tissues [5]. Based on their central role in the GH/IGF endocrine axis and their involvement in growth regulation and osmoregulatory adaptation during smoltification, IGF-I and GHrec were selected in this study as molecular markers to assess physiological responses in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon.
The induction of triploidy may add another layer of complexity to the parr–smolt transformation. Farming of sterile triploid Atlantic salmon mitigates ecological concerns associated with escaped farmed fish and prevents the adverse effects of pre-harvest sexual maturation [19,20]. However, the altered physiology of triploids can result in differences in environmental adaptability and nutritional needs, affecting their growth and welfare compared to diploids, particularly after seawater transfer [21,22]. Furthermore, triploidy may influence parr–smolt transformation [23].
In a previous study [24], biomarkers related to growth, osmoregulation, and stress followed similar patterns in young triploid and diploid salmon. Both diploids and triploids appeared to successfully complete the parr–smolt transformation, as evidenced by decreased condition factor, reduced plasma chloride concentration and osmolality following seawater challenge tests, and temporal changes in muscular gene expression of IGF-I, GH, and growth hormone receptor (GHrec).
The present study builds upon these findings, aiming to further evaluate the effects of triploidy and diet on Atlantic salmon parr–smolt transformation, with a focus on the liver. The liver plays a vital role in metabolic processes, including the production and regulation of hormones involved in growth and osmoregulation [25,26]. Moreover, it exhibits the highest levels of IGF-I and GHrec gene expression in fish [14,27,28,29,30]. Therefore, assessing the hepatic expression of these genes during the parr–smolt transformation may provide insights into this developmental process.
To enhance our investigation, we employed RNAscope®, a sensitive multiplex nucleic acid technology that allows detection and visualization of mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded organs [31,32,33,34]. This enabled us to study the presence and location of IGF-I mRNA in the liver cells.
Our study aims to test whether triploidy and diet differentially affect the hepatic expression of IGF-I and GHrec genes during parr–smolt transformation in Atlantic salmon. Specifically, our objectives were to determine if there are significant differences in the hepatic expression levels of IGF-I and GHrec genes between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon during parr–smolt transformation, assess whether different dietary compositions result in different expression patterns, investigate the cellular location of IGF-I mRNA within liver cells, and quantify the mRNA signals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design, Fish Rearing, and Sample Collection

The experimental design, fish production, diet formulation, and rearing conditions were those described in Peruzzi et al. (2018) [35]. Briefly, diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) were reared in triplicate 200 L circular indoor tanks (initially ~3000 fish per tank, ~620 g biomass) and fed either a standard fish meal (STD) diet or a modified diet with 45% of fish meal replaced by hydrolyzed fish proteins (HFM) (Skretting AS, Stavanger, Norway) from the time of start-feeding, resulting in four experimental groups: diploid and triploid fish fed either STD or HFM diets.
Fish were maintained at low temperature (10 ± 0.5 °C) from start-feeding through parr–smolt transformation when they were transferred to 500 L tanks. Constant light conditions were employed throughout the experiment, except for a period of reduced day length (08L:16D) from September to October to simulate winter conditions and induce parr–smolt transformation [35].
Samplings were conducted monthly from October to December (2454–3044 degree-days post-start feeding, ddPSF), encompassing the parr–smolt transformation period. At each sampling time, liver samples (1 cm × 1 cm) were collected from 9 fish from each treatment group (3 fish per tank and 3 tanks for each treatment; body weights of fish are reported in the Supplementary Materials, Table S1). Samples were quickly frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C for subsequent gene expression analysis. Additional samples (n = 20) were fixed in paraformaldehyde (0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4), dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin for in situ hybridization. Serial sections (4 μm thick) were obtained using a microtome and processed with RNAscope® to investigate the presence and cellular location of IGF-I mRNA.

2.2. Gene Expression Analysis

2.2.1. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from liver samples collected at three time points: October (2454 ddPSF), November (2745 ddPSF), and December (3044 ddPSF), using TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA).
Prior to cDNA synthesis, samples were treated with DNase using a DNase I, Amplification Grade Kit (Invitrogen™, Waltham, MA, USA). First-strand cDNA was then synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and random hexamer primers (10 μM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA) in a total reaction volume of 22 μL. All protocols were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.2.2. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Specific primer sequences for the target genes (IGF-I and GHrec) and for the reference gene β-actin (β-ACT) were designed using Primer Express software version 3.0 (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and are presented in Table 1. The PCR reaction mixture (25 μL total volume) consisted of 12.5 μL of PowerSYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.75 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 8.5 μL RNAase-free water, and 2.5 μL cDNA. All reactions were performed in triplicate, including negative controls, using a real-time PCR 7500 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and analyzed with 7500 Software v2.0.5 (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
The PCR amplification protocol was as follows: (1) 50 °C for 2 min, (2) 95 °C for 10 min, (3) 95 °C for 15 s, and (4) 60 °C for 1 min. Steps 3–4 were repeated for 39 additional cycles, for a total of 40 cycles.
Following the amplification, a dissociation stage was included for melting curve analysis, which was performed over a range of 60–95 °C (increment of 0.5 °C for 2 s) to detect nonspecific products and/or primer dimers. The mRNA expression levels were normalized against β-ACT expression, which served as the housekeeping gene. Quantitative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [36].

2.3. RNAscope® Analysis

2.3.1. RNAscope® In Situ Hybridization for IGF-I mRNA Detection

RNAscope® in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed on a subset of liver sections from ten fish sampled in both October and November, previously identified as the critical months for Atlantic salmon parr–smolt transformation [24]. The procedure was carried out using a Ventana Discovery Ultra autostainer (Ventana Medical System, Roche, Tucson, AZ, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol.
The RNAscope® 2.5 VS specific Probe Ssa-LOC100136517 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics Inc., Santa Monica, CA, USA; Cat. No. 902109) was employed, targeting the region 2–712 of Salmo salar (Ssa) IGF-I mRNA (Accession No: NM_001123623.1). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) serial sections (4 µm thick) were deparaffinized and pre-treated with heat (97 °C for 24 min) and protease (ACD Kit RNAscope VS Universal AP cod. 323250, Advanced Cell Diagnostics Newark, CA, USA) prior to hybridization. The probe was incubated at 42 °C for 2 h.
Hybridization signals were visualized as red, punctate precipitates using the mRNA RED Detection Kit (Roche cod. 07099037001). For each sample, two additional sections were processed: one using probes for Ssa-PPIB [peptidylprolyl isomerase B (cyclophilin B)] as an endogenous control to assess RNA integrity, and another using dapB [Bacillus subtilis dihydrodipicolinate reductase gene] as a negative control to evaluate background staining [31,37].

2.3.2. Quantification of RNAscope® ISH Signals for IGF-I mRNA

Slide images were captured using an Aperio LV1 IVD slide scanner (Leica Biosystems, Milano, Italy) at 40× magnification (Figure 1a). Quantitative analysis of mRNA signals in October and November samples was performed using ImageJ software (version 2.7.0 Fiji) [38].
The “Trainable Weka Segmentation” plugin was employed to classify areas based on three color categories (Figure 1b): (i) IGF-I mRNA signals (red), (ii) nuclei stained with hematoxylin (green), and (iii) background (purple). A reference sample image was used for this classification. The IGF-I color class was then isolated using the “threshold” function (Figure 1c). Subsequently, images were subjected to a “watershed” function to separate signal clusters, and the “Analyse particles” function was used to estimate the number of positive signals per image (Figure 1d).
Quantification was performed on ten 100 × 100 µm2 tissue areas per slide, with each slide representing an individual animal (n = 10).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using R software (version R 4.3.2) [39]. Data were assessed for normality, and outliers were removed prior to analysis. Initial analysis of the gene expression data used a linear mixed model, which included sampling time, ploidy, and diet as fixed factors and tank as a random factor. In cases where the analyses revealed a non-significant effect, factors were removed from the statistical model. The data were then re-analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with sampling time and ploidy as main factors, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
RNAscope® ISH data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with sampling time as a fixed effect and slide (corresponding to individual animals) as a random factor. Results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Differences among means were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Gene Expression Analysis

The statistical analysis revealed that diet and tank had no significant effect on gene expression. Consequently, these factors were removed from the statistical model, and the data were re-analyzed. The hepatic expression of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was significantly influenced by sampling time, but not by ploidy (Figure 2a). IGF-I mRNA levels increased significantly from October to November (p < 0.05), followed by a non-significant decrease from November to December.
Growth hormone receptor (GHrec) expression showed a similar trend to IGF-I, with an increase from October to November and a slight decrease from November to December. This increase was particularly pronounced in diploid fish, approaching statistical significance (p = 0.07). However, overall changes were not statistically significant, and there was no effect of ploidy (Figure 2b).

3.2. Cellular Localization and Quantification of IGF-I mRNA Using RNAscope® Technology

Quantitative analysis revealed a significantly higher mean number of IGF-I mRNA signals in November (1159.51 ± 28.30) than in October (527.34 ± 11.27; p < 0.0001; Figure 3). All samples showed good mRNA integrity when incubated with the PPIB probe and were negative for the DapB control probe (Figure 4a), confirming the specificity and reliability of the assay. The IGF-I mRNA signal was visualized as multiple small red dots with nuclear and perinuclear localization (Figure 4d), diffusely distributed among hepatocytes. The number of dots per cell varied between sampling times, with November samples (Figure 4c) exhibiting a higher signal density compared to October samples (Figure 4b), consistent with the quantitative analysis.

4. Discussion

This study, investigating the hepatic expression of genes involved in fish growth and osmoregulation during Atlantic salmon parr–smolt transformation, complements and extends the published work on growth [35], liver transcriptome and histology [40], digestive tract morphology and enzyme activities [41], and physiological indicators and biomarkers [24] carried out on the same treatment groups of fish. The focus was on the hepatic expression of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and growth hormone receptor (GHrec), using real-time PCR and RNAscope® in situ hybridization. Our findings point to the liver being a relevant tissue for investigation and playing a role in the regulation of physiological processes that occur during the parr–smolt transformation [42].

4.1. Effects of Ploidy and Diet

Neither ploidy nor diet significantly affected gene expression during parr–smolt transformation. These findings indicate the efficacy of low-temperature rearing conditions and phosphorus-rich diets in mitigating any differences between diploids and triploids. These results align with previous studies demonstrating that the physiological requirements of triploids can be met by adjusting water temperature and diet composition [23,24,25,43,44,45,46].

4.2. Temporal Changes in Gene Expression

While ploidy and diet effects were negligible, our study revealed significant temporal changes in hepatic gene expression during the parr–smolt transformation (Figure 2), which increased from October (2454 ddPSF) to November (2745 ddPSF), followed by a non-significant decrease from November to December (3044 ddPSF) (Figure 2). This is consistent with the significant up-regulation of hepatic genes correlated with metabolic and growth processes previously observed in diploid and triploid parr vs. smolts in some of the same treatment groups of fish (STD diet) [40].
The observed temporal pattern (Figure 2) is mirrored in physiological changes during smolt development and corresponds with the findings of our previous study on muscular gene expression [24]. In both studies, we observed that IGF-I and GHrec expression peaked during parr–smolt transformation in November, with a consistent pattern across tissues (liver and muscle).
The endocrine control of the parr–smolt transformation involves multiple hormones, including GH and IGF-I, and their receptors, which stimulate seawater adaptation and osmoregulatory changes [47]. Plasma concentrations of these hormones temporarily increase [48], stimulating chloride cell proliferation and/or enlargement [49] and enhancing gill ion transporter enzyme activity [12]. The findings of our study on hepatic expression of GHrec and IGF-I are in line with these established endocrine patterns. Our observations of sustained hepatic GHrec expression, even as fish approached full seawater adaptation, corroborate previous findings that GH receptor density in the liver and other organs remains elevated after plasma GH levels return to freshwater levels [5]. GH receptors are present in various osmoregulatory organs besides the liver, suggesting that GH may act on these organs either directly or via local IGF-I release [49]. Consistently, IGF-I mRNA has been detected in various osmoregulatory organs, with enhanced expression observed after seawater transfer of several species of salmonids [49].

4.3. Molecular Markers of Parr–Smolt Transformation

The distinct hepatic expression patterns of IGF-I and GHrec observed in our study (Figure 2) suggest that these could serve as molecular biomarkers of parr–smolt transformation in Atlantic salmon. The findings align with those of Shwe et al. [40], who identified differentially expressed genes and enriched biological pathways in the liver of Atlantic salmon during parr–smolt transformation. Together, the findings suggest that changes in hepatic gene expression could serve as molecular indicators for assessing smolt readiness for transfer to seawater, in conjunction with established methods such as seawater challenge tests, gill Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) mRNA expression and enzymatic activity measurements, and plasma concentrations of smolt-related hormones [10,50,51]. Importantly, our findings of similarity in gene expression patterns between diploid and triploid salmon indicate that these molecular markers could be equally applicable to both ploidy levels.
The peak expression of the hepatic genes during November (2745 ddPSF) (Figure 2) suggests this may have coincided with the optimal time for transfer of the fish to seawater. This aligns with the work of Harvey et al. [52], who characterized genome regulation in salmon liver during the parr–smolt transformation. Their integrated analyses revealed a marked upregulation of genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis pathways in the fish just prior to seawater entry. The authors linked this increased protein synthesis capacity to anticipated higher circulating growth hormone levels after seawater migration. Since GH and IGF-I are part of the same hormonal axis regulating growth and protein anabolism, the peak expression observed in our November samples is consistent with the preparatory upregulation of the translation machinery reported by Harvey et al. [52].

4.4. RNAscope® Analysis

RNAscope® analysis allowed visualization of IGF-I mRNA as discrete signals with nuclear and perinuclear localization in hepatocytes, providing spatial context to the expression patterns. The hepatic parenchyma of November samples exhibited markedly higher positivity to the IGF-I probe compared to October samples (Figure 3), mirroring the seasonal trend observed in the gene expression analysis (Figure 2). Quantitative estimation of IGF-I mRNA abundance revealed a significantly higher number of IGF-I mRNA signals in November compared to October (Figure 3), corroborating the PCR results. This substantial increase underscores the considerable upregulation of IGF-I expression during the parr–smolt transformation.
These findings align with the known actions of IGF-I, GH, and cortisol, acting together to improve salinity tolerance and playing crucial roles in osmoregulation and seawater adaptation [48]. The increased IGF-I expression observed in November (2745 ddPSF), both at the transcriptional level and in terms of spatial distribution within hepatocytes, underscores its importance in preparing Atlantic salmon for the physiological challenges associated with seawater entry.
The consistency between our PCR and RNAscope® results provides robust evidence that IGF-I plays a role in the regulation of the physiological processes involved in parr–smolt transformation of Atlantic salmon. The depth of information provided by RNAscope® makes it a valuable tool for research purposes. Future studies could utilize this technique to investigate tissue distributions of the molecular components known to be involved in parr–smolt transformation, potentially leading to more refined molecular markers for assessing smolt readiness for transfer from freshwater to seawater.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our analysis of hepatic expression of key genes involved in fish growth and osmoregulation, complemented by RNAscope® visualization, revealed significant temporal changes during Atlantic salmon parr–smolt transformation. Peak gene expression was observed in November (2745 ddPSF), a pattern consistent across ploidies and unaffected by diet type (standard or hydrolyzed fish protein). These findings suggest that the rearing conditions successfully minimized ploidy-related molecular differences. The liver’s role in parr–smolt transformation was demonstrated by our findings, indicating its value as an organ for studying biomarkers linked to parr–smolt transformation. The observed temporal changes in IGF-I and GHrec expression align with the physiological preparations necessary for seawater adaptation, and additional supportive evidence was provided by quantification of IGF-I mRNA in the liver cells. Future research could focus on validating these markers across different environmental conditions and exploring their applicability in commercial aquaculture settings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani16030515/s1, Table S1: Body weight of fish used in hepatic gene expression analysis expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 per experimental group). STD, standard diet; HFM, modified diet; 2N, diploid; and 3N, triploid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.P., M.J., G.R., and D.B.; methodology: M.B., E.F., L.M., and M.V.; formal analysis and investigation: M.B., E.F., L.M., and M.V.; writing—original draft preparation: M.B. and E.F.; writing—review and editing: M.B., E.F., L.M., S.P., M.J., M.V., G.R., and D.B.; funding acquisition: S.P., M.J., G.R. and L.M.; resources: L.M., M.V., G.R., and D.B.; supervision: G.R. and D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Norwegian Research Council, Regional Research Fund-RFF-NORD (grant no. 248028) to the Arctic University of Norway and by the University of Padova (2018-prot. BIRD184589) to G.R. G.R. and L.M. were supported by University of Padova funds.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, approved by the Norwegian regulations for use of animals in experiments, and approved by the Norwegian Committee on Ethics in Animal Experimentation via project license (Permit ID 8180) issued by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet, FOTS). Terminal measurements were performed on fish euthanized with an overdose of anesthetic (Benzocaine, 120 mg L−1). All efforts were made to minimize fish suffering.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Erica Melchiotti (IZSVe), Laura Gregoletto, and Carlo Poltronieri (UNIPD) for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shahbandeh, M. Global Farmed Atlantic Salmon Production 2000–2025. Statista, 2024. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1179062/global-atlantic-salmon-production/ (accessed on 1 December 2025).
  2. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024—Blue Transformation in Action; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morera, F.J.; Castro-Guarda, M.; Nualart, D.; Espinosa, G.; Muñoz, J.L.; Vargas-Chacoff, L. The biological basis of smoltification in Atlantic salmon. Austral J. Vet. Sci. 2021, 53, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aunsmo, A.; Persson, D.; Stormoen, M.; Romstad, S.; Jamtøy, O.; Midtlyng, P.J. Real-time monitoring of cause-specific mortality and losses in industrial salmon farming. Aquaculture 2023, 563, 738969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Evans, D.H.; Claiborne, J.B. The Physiology of Fishes, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. McCormick, S.D.; Hansen, L.P.; Quinn, T.P.; Saunders, R.L. Movement, migration, and smolting of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1998, 55, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sheridan, M.A. Alterations in lipid metabolism accompanying smoltification and seawater adaptation of salmonid fish. Aquaculture 1989, 82, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Björnsson, B.T.; Stefansson, S.O.; McCormick, S.D. Environmental endocrinology of salmon smoltification. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011, 170, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. McCormick, S.D.; Sheehan, T.F.; Björnsson, B.T.; Lipsky, C.; Kocik, J.F.; Regish, A.M.; O’DEa, M.F. Physiological and endocrine changes in Atlantic salmon smolts. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2013, 70, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McCormick, S.D. Smolt Physiology and Endocrinology. In Fish Physiology, Euryhaline Fishes; McCormick, S.D., Farrell, A.P., Brauner, C.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 32, pp. 199–251. [Google Scholar]
  11. McCormick, S.D. Effects of Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factor I on Salinity Tolerance and Gill Na+, K+-ATPase in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar): Interaction with Cortisol. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1996, 101, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Høgåsen, H.R. Physiological Changes Associated with the Diadromous Migration of Salmonids; NRC Research Press: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  13. McCormick, S.D.; Moriyama, S.; Björnsson, B.T. Low temperature limits photoperiod control of smolting in Atlantic salmon through endocrine mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol.–Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2000, 278, R1352–R1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reinecke, M.; Björnsson, B.T.; Dickhoff, W.W.; McCormick, S.D.; Navarro, I.; Power, D.M.; Gutiérrez, J. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors in fish: Where we are and where to go. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2005, 142, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Björnsson, B.T.; Johansson, V.; Benedet, S.; Einarsdottir, I.E.; Hildahl, J.; Agustsson, T.; Jönsson, E. Growth hormone endocrinology of salmonids: Regulatory mechanisms and mode of action. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 27, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chan, S.J.; Steiner, D.F. Structure and expression of IGF genes in fish. In Fish Physiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 13, pp. 213–224. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moriyama, S.; Ayson, F.G.; Kawauchi, H. Growth regulation by insulin-like growth factor-I in fish. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Radaelli, G.; Patruno, M.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Funkenstein, B. Expression and cellular localization of insulin-like growth factor-II protein and mRNA in Sparus aurata during development. J. Endocrinol. 2003, 178, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Piferrer, F.; Beaumont, A.; Falguière, J.-C.; Flajšhans, M.; Haffray, P.; Colombo, L. Polyploid fish and shellfish: Production, biology and applications to aquaculture for performance improvement and genetic containment. Aquaculture 2009, 293, 125–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Benfey, T.J. Effectiveness of triploidy as a management tool for reproductive containment of farmed fish: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) as a case study. Rev. Aquac. 2016, 8, 264–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taranger, G.L.; Carrillo, M.; Schulz, R.W.; Fontaine, P.; Zanuy, S.; Felip, A.; Weltzien, F.-A.; Dufour, S.; Karlsen, Ø.; Norberg, B.; et al. Control of puberty in farmed fish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2010, 165, 483–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Madaro, A.; Kjøglum, S.; Hansen, T.; Fjelldal, P.G.; Stien, L.H. A comparison of triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) performance and welfare under commercial farming conditions in Norway. J. Appl. Aquac. 2022, 34, 1021–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Fonseka, R.; Fjelldal, P.G.; Sambraus, F.; Nilsen, T.O.; Remø, S.C.; Stien, L.H.; Reinardy, H.C.; Madaro, A.; Hansen, T.J.; Fraser, T.W. Triploidy leads to a mismatch of smoltification biomarkers in the gill and differences in the optimal salinity for post-smolt growth in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bortoletti, M.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Peruzzi, S.; Strand, J.E.T.; Jobling, M.; Radaelli, G.; Bertotto, D. Dietary effects on biomarkers of growth, stress, and welfare of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) during parr-smolt transformation. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 24, 101123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mommsen, T.P. Paradigms of growth in fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2001, 129, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nisembaum, L.G.; Martin, P.; Lecomte, F.; Falcón, J. Melatonin and osmoregulation in fish: A focus on Atlantic salmon Salmo salar smoltification. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2021, 33, e12955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Inoue, K.; Iwatani, H.; Takei, Y. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I of a Euryhaline fish Cottus kazika: cDNA cloning and expression after seawater acclimation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2003, 131, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vong, Q.; Chan, K.; Cheng, C. Quantification of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA by real-time PCR: Differential regulation of expression by GH. J. Endocrinol. 2003, 178, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wood, A.W.; Duan, C.; Bern, H.A. Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling in Fish. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2005, 243, 215–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nordgarden, U.; Fjelldal, P.-G.; Hansen, T.; Björnsson, B.T.; Wargelius, A. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I act together and independently when regulating growth in vertebral and muscle tissue of atlantic salmon postsmolts. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 149, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, F.; Flanagan, J.; Su, N.; Wang, L.-C.; Bui, S.; Nielson, A.; Wu, X.; Vo, H.-T.; Ma, X.-J.; Luo, Y. RNAscope. J. Mol. Diagn. 2012, 14, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anderson, C.M.; Zhang, B.; Miller, M.; Butko, E.; Wu, X.; Laver, T.; Kernag, C.; Kim, J.; Luo, Y.; Lamparski, H.; et al. Fully Automated RNAscope In Situ Hybridization Assays for Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Cells and Tissues. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 117, 2201–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bingham, V.; McIlreavey, L.; Greene, C.; O’Doherty, E.; Clarke, R.; Craig, S.; Salto-Tellez, M.; McQuaid, S.; Lewis, C.; James, J. RNAscope in situ hybridization confirms mRNA integrity in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cancer tissue samples. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 93392–93403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Monné Rodríguez, J.M.; Frisk, A.-L.; Kreutzer, R.; Lemarchand, T.; Lezmi, S.; Saravanan, C.; Stierstorfer, B.; Thuilliez, C.; Vezzali, E.; Wieczorek, G.; et al. European Society of Toxicologic Pathology (Pathology 2.0 Molecular Pathology Special Interest Group): Review of In Situ Hybridization Techniques for Drug Research and Development. Toxicol. Pathol. 2023, 51, 92–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Peruzzi, S.; Puvanendran, V.; Riesen, G.; Seim, R.R.; Hagen, Ø.; Martínez-Llorens, S.; Falk-Petersen, I.-B.; Fernandes, J.M.O.; Jobling, M. Growth and development of skeletal anomalies in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed phosphorus-rich diets with fish meal and hydrolyzed fish protein. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mazzei, M.; Vascellari, M.; Zanardello, C.; Melchiotti, E.; Vannini, S.; Forzan, M.; Marchetti, V.; Albanese, F.; Abramo, F. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and RNAscope in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) as effective tools to diagnose feline herpesvirus-1-associated dermatitis. Vet. Dermatol. 2019, 30, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  40. Odei, D.K.; Hagen, Ø.; Peruzzi, S.; Falk-Petersen, I.-B.; Fernandes, J.M.O. Transcriptome sequencing and histology reveal dosage compensation in the liver of triploid pre-smolt Atlantic salmon. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martínez-Llorens, S.; Peruzzi, S.; Falk-Petersen, I.-B.; Godoy-Olmos, S.; Ulleberg, L.O.; Tomás-Vidal, A.; Puvanendran, V.; Odei, D.K.; Hagen, Ø.; Fernandes, J.M.O.; et al. Digestive tract morphology and enzyme activities of juvenile diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed fishmeal-based diets with or without fish protein hydrolysates. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shwe, A.; Krasnov, A.; Visnovska, T.; Ramberg, S.; Østbye, T.-K.K.; Andreassen, R. Expression Analysis in Atlantic Salmon Liver Reveals miRNAs Associated with Smoltification and Seawater Adaptation. Biology 2022, 11, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fjelldal, P.G.; Hansen, T.J.; Lock, E.-J.; Wargelius, A.; Fraser, T.W.K.; Sambraus, F.; El-Mowafi, A.; Albrektsen, S.; Waagbø, R.; Ørnsrud, R. Increased dietary phosphorous prevents vertebral deformities in triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquacult. Nutr. 2016, 22, 72–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smedley, M.A.; Clokie, B.G.J.; Migaud, H.; Campbell, P.; Walton, J.; Hunter, D.; Corrigan, D.; Taylor, J. Dietary phosphorous and protein supplementation enhances seawater growth and reduces severity of vertebral malformation in triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 2016, 451, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sambraus, F.; Olsen, R.E.; Remen, M.; Hansen, T.J.; Torgersen, T.; Fjelldal, P.G. Water temperature and oxygen: The effect of triploidy on performance and metabolism in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) post-smolts. Aquaculture 2017, 473, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Benhaïm, D.; Leblanc, C.A.L.; Horri, K.; Mannion, K.; Galloway, M.; Leeper, A.; Knobloch, S.; Sigurgeirsson, Ó.; Thorarensen, H. The effect of triploidy on the performance, gut microbiome and behaviour of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) raised at low temperature. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020, 229, 105031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nilsen, T.O.; Ebbesson, L.O.E.; Kiilerich, P.; Björnsson, B.T.; Madsen, S.S.; McCormick, S.D.; Stefansson, S.O. Endocrine systems in juvenile anadromous and landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Seasonal development and seawater acclimation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2008, 155, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. McCormick, S.D. Endocrine Control of Osmoregulation in Teleost Fish. Am. Zool. 2001, 41, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sakamoto, T.; Hirano, T. Expression of insulin-like growth factor I gene in osmoregulatory organs during seawater adaptation of the salmonid fish: Possible mode of osmoregulatory action of growth hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 1912–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Nilsen, T.O.; Ebbesson, L.O.E.; Madsen, S.S.; McCormick, S.D.; Andersson, E.; Björnsson, B.T.; Prunet, P.; Stefansson, S.O. Differential expression of gill Na+,K+-ATPaseα- and β-subunits, Na+,K+,2Cl− cotransporter and CFTR anion channel in juvenile anadromous and landlocked Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 210, 2885–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McCormick, S.D.; Regish, A.M.; Christensen, A.K. Distinct freshwater and seawater isoforms of Na+/K+-ATPase in gill chloride cells of Atlantic salmon. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 3994–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Harvey, T.N.; Gillard, G.B.; Røsæg, L.L.; Grammes, F.; Monsen, Ø.; Vik, J.O.; Hvidsten, T.R.; Sandve, S.R. The genome regulatory landscape of Atlantic salmon liver through smoltification. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0302388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 16 00515 g001
Figure 1. Image processing workflow for quantification of IGF-I mRNA in salmon liver using RNAscope® and ImageJ (Fiji) analyses. (a) Representative liver section image (40× magnification). (b) Segmented image following Trainable Weka Segmentation. (c) Thresholded image highlighting IGF-I mRNA signals. (d) Quantification of discrete IGF-I mRNA signals (red dots) using the analyze particles function. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Figure 1. Image processing workflow for quantification of IGF-I mRNA in salmon liver using RNAscope® and ImageJ (Fiji) analyses. (a) Representative liver section image (40× magnification). (b) Segmented image following Trainable Weka Segmentation. (c) Thresholded image highlighting IGF-I mRNA signals. (d) Quantification of discrete IGF-I mRNA signals (red dots) using the analyze particles function. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Animals 16 00515 g001
Animals 16 00515 g002
Figure 2. Hepatic mRNA expression of (a) insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and (b) growth hormone receptor (GHrec) in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon during the parr–smolt transformation. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistically significant differences are indicated by an asterisk * (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Hepatic mRNA expression of (a) insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and (b) growth hormone receptor (GHrec) in diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon during the parr–smolt transformation. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistically significant differences are indicated by an asterisk * (p < 0.05).
Animals 16 00515 g002
Animals 16 00515 g003
Figure 3. Quantitative analysis of IGF-I mRNA using RNAscope® in situ hybridization in Atlantic salmon liver. Mean number of IGF-I mRNA signals detected per animal (n = 10) in October and November, with 10 counts per animal. Each bar represents a different animal, distinguished by unique colors. Error bars represent standard error (SE).
Figure 3. Quantitative analysis of IGF-I mRNA using RNAscope® in situ hybridization in Atlantic salmon liver. Mean number of IGF-I mRNA signals detected per animal (n = 10) in October and November, with 10 counts per animal. Each bar represents a different animal, distinguished by unique colors. Error bars represent standard error (SE).
Animals 16 00515 g003
Animals 16 00515 g004
Figure 4. Qualitative analysis of IGF-I mRNA using RNAscope® in situ hybridization in Atlantic salmon liver. Representative images of RNAscope® in situ hybridization in liver parenchyma: (a) negative control; (b) sample from October, with (d) detail showing a higher-contrast view of IGF-I mRNA signal distribution; and (c) sample from November. Red spots indicate discrete IGF-I mRNA signals. Nuclei are counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bar: 20 µm. Images taken at 40× magnification.
Figure 4. Qualitative analysis of IGF-I mRNA using RNAscope® in situ hybridization in Atlantic salmon liver. Representative images of RNAscope® in situ hybridization in liver parenchyma: (a) negative control; (b) sample from October, with (d) detail showing a higher-contrast view of IGF-I mRNA signal distribution; and (c) sample from November. Red spots indicate discrete IGF-I mRNA signals. Nuclei are counterstained with hematoxylin. Scale bar: 20 µm. Images taken at 40× magnification.
Animals 16 00515 g004
Table 1. Primer sequences used.
Table 1. Primer sequences used.
GeneForward Primer (5′–3′)Reverse Primer (5′–3′)
IGF-I5′-CGGTCACATAACCGTGGTATTG-3′5′-CTGCCTTGCCAGACTTGACA-3′
GHrec5′-GGAAGACATCGTGGAACCAGA-3′5′-CAAACTGGCTCCCGGTTAGA-3′
β-ACT5′-CAGCCCTCCTTCCTCGGTAT-3′5′-AGCACCGTGTTGGCGTACA-3′
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bortoletti, M.; Fonsatti, E.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Peruzzi, S.; Jobling, M.; Vascellari, M.; Radaelli, G.; Bertotto, D. Hepatic Expression of Growth Hormone Receptor (GHrec) and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) Genes and Cellular Location of IGF-I mRNA in Diploid and Triploid Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Undergoing Parr–Smolt Transformation. Animals 2026, 16, 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030515

AMA Style

Bortoletti M, Fonsatti E, Maccatrozzo L, Peruzzi S, Jobling M, Vascellari M, Radaelli G, Bertotto D. Hepatic Expression of Growth Hormone Receptor (GHrec) and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) Genes and Cellular Location of IGF-I mRNA in Diploid and Triploid Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Undergoing Parr–Smolt Transformation. Animals. 2026; 16(3):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bortoletti, Martina, Elisa Fonsatti, Lisa Maccatrozzo, Stefano Peruzzi, Malcolm Jobling, Marta Vascellari, Giuseppe Radaelli, and Daniela Bertotto. 2026. "Hepatic Expression of Growth Hormone Receptor (GHrec) and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) Genes and Cellular Location of IGF-I mRNA in Diploid and Triploid Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Undergoing Parr–Smolt Transformation" Animals 16, no. 3: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030515

APA Style

Bortoletti, M., Fonsatti, E., Maccatrozzo, L., Peruzzi, S., Jobling, M., Vascellari, M., Radaelli, G., & Bertotto, D. (2026). Hepatic Expression of Growth Hormone Receptor (GHrec) and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) Genes and Cellular Location of IGF-I mRNA in Diploid and Triploid Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Undergoing Parr–Smolt Transformation. Animals, 16(3), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop