Effects of Copper Citrate and Copper Sulfate on Intestinal Health, Muscle Fiber Traits, and Antioxidant Capacity in Weaned Pigs
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals, Design, and Diets
2.2. Performance Measurements and Sample Collection
2.3. Total RNA Extraction and Real-Time Quantitative PCR
2.4. Immunofluorescence Homology Double-Labeling Assay
2.5. Antioxidant Properties
2.6. Histological Analysis
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Growth Performance
3.2. Percentage of Slow-Twitch Muscle Fibers
3.3. The Expression of Genes Related to Muscle Fiber Types
3.4. Muscle Antioxidant Status
3.5. Ileal Morphology
3.6. Ileal Tight Junction Gene Expression
3.7. Ileal Inflammatory Gene Expression
3.8. Ileal Antioxidant Status
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Cu | Copper |
| CuCit | Copper citrate |
| CuSO4 | Copper sulfate |
| ADG | Average daily gain |
| ADFI | Average daily feed intake |
| F/G | Feed-to-gain ratio |
| LD muscle | Longissimus dorsi muscle |
| MyHC | Myosin heavy chain |
| ZO-1 | Zonula occludens-1 |
| IL-1β | Interleukin-1 beta |
| IL-10 | Interleukin-10 |
| TNF-α | Tumor necrosis factor-alpha |
| GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase |
| MDA | Malondialdehyde |
| T-SOD | Total superoxide dismutase |
| CAT | Catalase |
| T-AOC | Total antioxidant capacity |
| H&E | Hematoxylin and eosin |
| SEM | Standard error of the mean |
References
- Saeed, M.; Hassan, F.; Al-Khalaifah, H.; Islam, R.; Kamboh, A.A.; Liu, G. Fermented Banana Feed and Nanoparticles: A New Eco-Friendly, Cost-Effective Potential Green Approach for Poultry Industry. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rao, Z.-X.; Tokach, M.D.; Woodworth, J.C.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Goodband, R.D.; Gebhardt, J.T. Effects of Various Feed Additives on Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics: A Review. Animals 2023, 13, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, M.; Wang, Y. Unveiling Excessive Feed-Sources Copper-Induced Ileitis in Chickens: Insights into Tight Junction Damage and ROS/NLRP3/Pyroptosis Axis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2026, 299, 110357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, M.; Thompson, J.; Calle, A. Novel Feed Additive Delivers Antimicrobial Copper and Influences Fecal Microbiota in Pigs. Microbiol. Spectrum 2024, 12, e04281-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Yan, Q.; Shi, Y.; Long, M. Copper Toxicity in Animals: A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 203, 2675–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, C.C.; Yan, J.Y.; Dong, B.; Zhu, L.; Tian, Y.Y.; Gong, L.M. Effects of Graded Levels of Cupric Citrate on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status, Serum Lipid Metabolites and Immunity, and Tissue Residues of Trace Elements in Weaned Pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 30, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, Q. Cupric Citrate Supplementation Improves Growth Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Microbiota of Broilers. Anim. Biosci. 2024, 38, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Tu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Hong, R.; Yan, J.; Zhang, G.-W. Effects of Organic and Inorganic Copper on Cecal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Growing Rabbits. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1179374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Yan, J.; Hao, H.; Yong, F.; Yang, L.; Yang, W.; Che, D. Effects of Dietary Fiber and Copper on the Performance and Gut Microbiota of Finishing Pigs. Animals 2024, 14, 3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, R.; Feng, L.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Ren, H.-M.; Jin, X.-W.; Li, S.-W.; Tang, L.; Zhou, X.-Q.; Jiang, W.-D. Dietary Copper Improves Intestinal Structural Integrity in Juvenile Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) Probably Related to Its Increased Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity and Apical Junction Complex. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 18, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Giancamillo, A.; Rossi, R.; Martino, P.A.; Aidos, L.; Maghin, F.; Domeneghini, C.; Corino, C. Copper Sulphate Forms in Piglet Diets: Microbiota, Intestinal Morphology and Enteric Nervous System Glial Cells. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhong, J.; Fang, R. Potential Application of Lonicera Japonica Extracts in Animal Production: From the Perspective of Intestinal Health. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 719877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, X.; Xiong, K.; Fang, R.; Li, M. Weaning Stress and Intestinal Health of Piglets: A Review. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1042778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, K.H.; Kang, S.W.; Yoo, J.S.; Song, D.K.; Chung, Y.H.; Kwon, G.T.; Kim, Y.Y. Effects of Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Larvae Hydrolysate on Nutrient Ileal Digestibility in Growing Pigs Compared to Those of Defatted Mealworm Larvae Meal, Fermented Poultry by-Product, and Hydrolyzed Fish Soluble. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 33, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, S.S.; Masood, S.; Zaneb, H.; Rabbani, I.; Akbar, J.; Kuthu, Z.H.; Masood, A.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E. Effects of Copper Nanoparticles on Performance, Muscle and Bone Characteristics and Serum Metabolites in Broilers. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 84, e261578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villagómez-Estrada, S.; Pérez, J.F.; Van Kuijk, S.; Melo-Durán, D.; Karimirad, R.; Solà-Oriol, D. Dietary Preference of Newly Weaned Pigs and Nutrient Interactions According to Copper Levels and Sources with Different Solubility Characteristics. Animals 2020, 10, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, C.D.; Stein, H.H. Digestibility and Metabolism of Copper in Diets for Pigs and Influence of Dietary Copper on Growth Performance, Intestinal Health, and Overall Immune Status: A Review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Soufi, S.; García, J.; Nicodemus, N.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Cegarra, E.; Muíños, A.; Losada, A.P.; Miranda, M.; López-Alonso, M. Marine Macroalgae in Rabbit Feed—Effects on Meat Quality. Meat Sci. 2024, 216, 109584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, W.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, X.; Mao, P.; Gao, M.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Q. Effects of Astragalus Polysaccharide Supplementation on Growth Performance, Carcass Quality, Muscle Fiber Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Development of Finishing Pigs. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1654720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, J.; Moon, S.S.; Song, S.; Cheng, H.; Im, C.; Du, L.; Kim, G.-D. Comparative Review of Muscle Fiber Characteristics between Porcine Skeletal Muscles. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2024, 66, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, X.; Liu, Q.; Meng, Q.; Wang, L.; Yan, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L. TMT-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Porcine Muscle Associated with Postmortem Meat Quality. Food Chem. 2020, 328, 127133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okamoto, S.; Asgar, N.F.; Yokota, S.; Saito, K.; Minokoshi, Y. Role of the A2 Subunit of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase and Its Nuclear Localization in Mitochondria and Energy Metabolism-Related Gene Expressions in C2C12 Cells. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2019, 90, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Röckl, K.S.C.; Hirshman, M.F.; Brandauer, J.; Fujii, N.; Witters, L.A.; Goodyear, L.J. Skeletal Muscle Adaptation to Exercise Training: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Mediates Muscle Fiber Type Shift. Diabetes 2007, 56, 2062–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendonça, M.V.; Nakasone, D.H.; Martinez, C.H.G.; Gemelli, J.L.; Pereira, A.S.C.; Pugine, S.M.P.; De Melo, M.P.; De Andrade, A.F.C.; Araújo, L.F.; Augusto, K.V.Z.; et al. Copper and Zinc Hydroxychloride Cosupplementation Improve Growth Performance and Carcass and Reduce Diarrhea Frequency in Grower-Finisher Pigs. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2021, 5, txab202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mauger, D.M.; Siegfried, N.A.; Weeks, K.M. The Genetic Code as Expressed through Relationships between mRNA Structure and Protein Function. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 1180–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buccitelli, C.; Selbach, M. mRNAs, Proteins and the Emerging Principles of Gene Expression Control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 21, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whitlow, T.J.; Zhang, Y.; Ferguson, N.; Perez, A.M.; Patel, H.; Link-Kemp, J.A.; Larson, E.M.; Mezzell, A.T.; Shanbhag, V.C.; Petris, M.J.; et al. Regulation of Atp7a RNA Contributes to Differentiation-Dependent Cu Redistribution in Skeletal Muscle Cells. Metallomics 2023, 15, mfad042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vest, K.E.; Paskavitz, A.L.; Lee, J.B.; Padilla-Benavides, T. Dynamic Changes in Copper Homeostasis and Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Atp7a during Myogenic Differentiation. Metallomics 2018, 10, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colin-Alvarez, B.M.; Dominguez-Vara, I.A.D.; Trujillo-Gutierrez, D.; Bojorquez-Gastelum, J.L.; Sanchez-Torres, J.E.; Morales-Almaraz, E.; Olivan, M.C.; Velazquez-Garduño, G.; Pinos-Rodriguez, J.M.; Grageola-Nuñez, F. Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Meat Quality and Histochemical Characteristics of Muscle Fibers in Mexican Hairless Finishing Pigs Supplemented with Organic Copper. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyt. 2024, 27, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Wang, J.; Lin, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H.; Ma, X. Clostridium Butyricum Alleviates Weaned Stress of Piglets by Improving Intestinal Immune Function and Gut Microbiota. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 135014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.T.T.; Kheravii, S.K.; Wu, S.; Roberts, J.R.; Swick, R.A.; Toghyani, M. Sources and Levels of Copper Affect Liver Copper Profile, Intestinal Morphology and Cecal Microbiota Population of Broiler Chickens Fed Wheat-Soybean Meal Diets. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lönnerdal, B. Intestinal Regulation of Copper Homeostasis: A Developmental Perspective. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 846S–850S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Mehmood, K.; Chang, Z.; Li, K.; Jiang, X.; Nabi, F.; Ijaz, M.; Rehman, M.U.; Javed, M.T.; et al. Intestinal Epithelial Cell Injury Induced by Copper Containing Nanoparticles in Piglets. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 56, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Wen, Y.; Lin, G.; Meng, C.; He, P.; Wang, F. Different Sources of Copper Effect on Intestinal Epithelial Cell: Toxicity, Oxidative Stress, and Metabolism. Metabolites 2020, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, L.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, D.; Yin, Y.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Yin, Y. Dietary Copper Improves Intestinal Morphology via Modulating Intestinal Stem Cell Activity in Pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fry, R.S.; Ashwell, M.S.; Lloyd, K.E.; O’Nan, A.T.; Flowers, W.L.; Stewart, K.R.; Spears, J.W. Amount and Source of Dietary Copper Affects Small Intestine Morphology, Duodenal Lipid Peroxidation, Hepatic Oxidative Stress, and mRNA Expression of Hepatic Copper Regulatory Proteins in Weanling Pigs1,2. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 3112–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, T.A.; Cook, D.R.; Ward, M.M.; Williams, C.M.; Spears, J.W. Effect of Dietary Copper Source (Cupric Citrate and Cupric Sulfate) and Concentration on Growth Performance and Fecal Copper Excretion in Weanling Pigs12. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, Y.; Li, R.; Piao, X.; Lin, G.; He, P. Different Copper Sources and Levels Affect Growth Performance, Copper Content, Carcass Characteristics, Intestinal Microorganism and Metabolism of Finishing Pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomaszewska, E.; Dobrowolski, P.; Kwiecień, M. Alterations in Intestinal and Liver Histomorphology and Basal Hematological and Biochemical Parameters in Relation to Different Sources of Dietary Copper in Adult Rats. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2017, 17, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.; Jeong, J.Y.; Park, S.H.; Jung, H.; Kim, M. Effects of Dietary Copper Sources and Levels on Growth Performance, Copper Digestibility, Fecal and Serum Mineral Characteristics in Growing Pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2022, 64, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Branchett, W.J.; Saraiva, M.; O’Garra, A. Regulation of Inflammation by Interleukin-10 in the Intestinal and Respiratory Mucosa. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2024, 91, 102495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forouzandeh, A.; Blavi, L.; Pérez, J.F.; D’Angelo, M.; González-Solé, F.; Monteiro, A.; Stein, H.H.; Solà-Oriol, D. How Copper Can Impact Pig Growth: Comparing the Effect of Copper Sulfate and Monovalent Copper Oxide on Oxidative Status, Inflammation, Gene Abundance, and Microbial Modulation as Potential Mechanisms of Action. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 100, skac224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, P.; Pan, Y.; Song, Q. Exploring Copper Metabolism and Cuproptosis, and Their Implications in Ocular Diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2026, 1011, 178472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Han, M.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, T.; Tay, Y.J.; Liu, G. Quercetin Enhances Antioxidant Defense and Modulates Immune Homeostasis in Mandarin Fish (Siniperca chuatsi): Insights from Biochemical and Transcriptomic Analyses. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2026, 57, 101690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, H.; Liu, J.; Pan, S.; Sun, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, F.; Ma, L.; Guo, Q. SOD mRNA and MDA Expression in Rectus Femoris Muscle of Rats with Different Eccentric Exercise Programs and Time Points. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prohaska, J.R.; Gybina, A.A. Intracellular Copper Transport in Mammals. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.-H.; Liu, X.-P.; Gu, X.-M.; Lv, H.-X.; Yang, Y.; Cai, Z.-X.; Di, B.; Wang, C.-K.; Gao, Y.-Y.; Jin, L. Effects of Dietary Nano-Composite of Copper and Carbon on Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity, and Cecal Microbiota of Weaned Ira White Rabbits. Animals 2025, 15, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paganin, A.C.L.; Monzani, P.S.; Carazzolle, M.F.; Araujo, R.B.; Gonzalez-Esquerra, R.; Haese, D.; Kill, J.L.; Rezende, G.S.; De Lima, C.G.; Malavazi, I.; et al. Assessment of Cecal Microbiota Modulation from Piglet Dietary Supplementation with Copper. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | Starting Weight (kg) | Final Weight (kg) | ADG (g) | ADFI (g) | F/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 7.71 | 15.34 | 272.60 | 456.80 | 1.68 |
| CuCit | 20 | 7.67 | 15.52 | 280.43 | 499.88 | 1.79 |
| 100 | 7.74 | 15.86 | 290.07 | 503.79 | 1.75 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 7.70 | 15.44 | 276.29 | 490.62 | 1.79 |
| 100 | 7.70 | 15.76 | 287.71 | 480.98 | 1.67 | |
| SEM | 0.186 | 0.424 | 10.683 | 14.247 | 0.078 | |
| Main effect of source | ||||||
| CuCit | 7.70 | 15.69 | 285.25 | 501.84 | 1.77 | |
| CuSO4 | 7.70 | 15.60 | 282.00 | 485.80 | 1.73 | |
| SEM | 0.171 | 0.414 | 9.206 | 10.243 | 0.063 | |
| Main effect of level | ||||||
| 0 | 7.71 | 15.34 | 272.64 | 456.80 * | 1.68 | |
| 20 | 7.69 | 15.48 | 278.36 | 495.00 * | 1.79 | |
| 100 | 7.72 | 15.81 | 288.89 | 492.00 | 1.71 | |
| SEM | 0.185 | 0.417 | 10.348 | 14.113 | 0.076 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | 0.616 | 0.970 | 0.924 | 0.629 | 0.589 | |
| p-value for source | 0.989 | 0.669 | 0.632 | 0.273 | 0.537 | |
| p-value for level | 0.866 | 0.251 | 0.281 | 0.081 | 0.109 | |
| p-value for source × level | 0.645 | 0.961 | 0.893 | 0.658 | 0.626 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | Slow-Twitch Muscle Fibers (%) |
|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 13.06 |
| CuCit | 20 | 16.40 |
| 100 | 18.59 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 13.39 |
| 100 | 16.24 | |
| SEM | 0.206 | |
| Main effect of source | ||
| CuCit | 17.49 | |
| CuSO4 | 14.81 | |
| SEM | 0.582 | |
| Main effect of level | ||
| 0 | 13.06 b | |
| 20 | 14.89 b | |
| 100 | 17.41 a | |
| SEM | 0.802 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | 0.155 | |
| p-value for source | 0.009 | |
| p-value for level | 0.002 | |
| p-value for source × level | 0.157 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | MyHC I | MyHC IIa | MyHC IIx | MyHC IIb | Tnni1 | Tnni2 | Myoglobin | AMPKα1 | AMPKα2 | PGC-1α |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 1.00 c | 1.00 d | 1.00 c | 1.00 c | 1.00 c | 1.00 | 1.00 b | 1.00 c | 1.00 c | 1.00 * |
| CuCit | 20 | 1.42 c | 7.98 ab | 2.16 a | 4.33 a | 1.42 bc | 1.06 | 0.84 b | 1.28 bc | 1.89 bc | 1.43 |
| 100 | 4.77 a | 4.55 c | 2.13 a | 4.69 a | 2.62 a | 1.41 | 1.32 ab | 2.28 a | 2.36 ab | 1.46 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 4.35 ab | 5.43 bc | 1.05 bc | 3.11 b | 2.59 a | 1.38 | 1.54 a | 1.87 ab | 3.16 a | 1.51 |
| 100 | 4.81 a | 8.99 a | 1.71 c | 4.08 a | 2.21 ab | 1.13 | 1.08 ab | 1.35 bc | 1.82 bc | 2.15 * | |
| SEM | 0.343 | 1.120 | 0.188 | 0.339 | 0.171 | 0.096 | 0.114 | 0.136 | 0.188 | 0.225 | |
| Main effect of source | |||||||||||
| CuCit | 3.10 | 6.27 | 2.15 | 4.52 | 2.02 * | 1.24 | 1.08 | 1.78 | 2.13 | 1.44 | |
| CuSO4 | 4.58 | 7.21 | 1.38 | 3.60 | 2.40 * | 1.26 | 1.31 | 1.61 | 2.49 | 1.83 | |
| SEM | 0.269 | 0.486 | 0.145 | 0.294 | 0.132 | 0.068 | 0.090 | 0.125 | 0.146 | 0.171 | |
| Main effect of level | |||||||||||
| 0 | 1.01 b | 1.00 b | 1.00 * | 1.00 b | 1.00 b | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 * | 1.00 b | 1.00 * | |
| 20 | 2.89 b | 6.71 a | 1.60 | 3.72 a | 2.00 a | 1.22 | 1.19 | 1.58 | 2.53 a | 1.47 | |
| 100 | 4.79 a | 6.77 a | 1.92 * | 4.39 a | 2.41 a | 1.27 | 1.20 | 1.82 * | 2.09 a | 1.80 * | |
| SEM | 0.675 | 0.414 | 0.297 | 0.417 | 0.298 | 0.123 | 0.183 | 0.257 | 0.330 | 0.253 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 0.011 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.056 | |
| p-value for source | 0.005 | 0.206 | 0.006 | 0.033 | 0.074 | 0.845 | 0.115 | 0.190 | 0.121 | 0.134 | |
| p-value for level | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.079 | <0.001 | 0.008 | 0.248 | 0.649 | 0.068 | 0.009 | 0.083 | |
| p-value for source × level | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.129 | 0.445 | 0.003 | 0.015 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.280 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | MDA (nmol/mg Prot) | T-SOD (U/mg Prot) | CAT (U/mg Prot) | T-AOC (U/mg Prot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 1.17 a | 9.23 ab | 2.28 d | 0.02 |
| CuCit | 20 | 0.37 d | 8.86 ab | 2.24 d | 0.02 |
| 100 | 0.87 b | 10.46 a | 5.36 a | 0.11 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 0.61 c | 8.57 b | 3.52 b | 0.08 |
| 100 | 0.33 d | 8.96 ab | 2.92 c | 0.14 | |
| SEM | 0.022 | 0.301 | 0.115 | 0.068 | |
| Main effect of source | |||||
| CuCit | 0.63 | 9.66 | 3.80 | 0.07 | |
| CuSO4 | 0.47 | 8.77 | 3.22 | 0.11 | |
| SEM | 0.015 | 0.213 | 0.087 | 0.062 | |
| Main effect of level | |||||
| 0 | 1.17 a | 9.23 | 2.28 b | 0.02 | |
| 20 | 0.49 b | 8.72 * | 2.88 b | 0.05 | |
| 100 | 0.61 b | 9.71 * | 4.14 a | 0.13 | |
| SEM | 0.125 | 0.416 | 0.574 | 0.018 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | <0.001 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.469 | |
| p-value for source | <0.001 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.461 | |
| p-value for level | 0.002 | 0.095 | 0.040 | 0.216 | |
| p-value for source × level | <0.001 | 0.077 | <0.001 | 0.822 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | Villus Height | Crypt Depth | Villus Height: Crypt Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 376.02 | 313.71 | 1.22 |
| CuCit | 20 | 473.88 | 226.98 | 2.12 |
| 100 | 433.11 | 218.32 | 1.98 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 463.38 | 240.12 | 1.92 |
| 100 | 369.12 | 191.71 | 1.93 | |
| SEM | 23.353 | 20.548 | 0.124 | |
| Main effect of source | ||||
| CuCit | 453.49 | 222.65 | 2.05 | |
| CuSO4 | 416.25 | 215.91 | 1.93 | |
| SEM | 22.787 | 11.750 | 0.079 | |
| Main effect of level | ||||
| 0 | 376.02 b | 313.71 a | 1.22 b | |
| 20 | 468.63 a | 233.55 b | 2.02 a | |
| 100 | 401.11 b | 205.01 b | 1.95 a | |
| SEM | 26.080 | 19.711 | 0.120 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | 0.101 | 0.356 | 0.578 | |
| p-value for source | 0.231 | 0.694 | 0.310 | |
| p-value for level | 0.005 | 0.003 | <0.001 | |
| p-value for source × level | 0.578 | 0.191 | 0.571 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | ZO-1 | Occludin |
|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 1.00 c | 1.00 |
| CuCit | 20 | 2.12 a | 1.25 |
| 100 | 1.05 c | 0.92 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 1.04 c | 0.86 |
| 100 | 1.82 b | 1.28 | |
| SEM | 0.115 | 0.106 | |
| Main effect of source | |||
| CuCit | 1.59 | 1.08 | |
| CuSO4 | 1.43 | 1.07 | |
| SEM | 0.216 | 0.100 | |
| Main effect of level | |||
| 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 20 | 1.58 | 1.06 | |
| 100 | 1.44 | 1.10 | |
| SEM | 0.281 | 0.146 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | <0.001 | 0.003 | |
| p-value for source | 0.621 | 0.915 | |
| p-value for level | 0.283 | 0.916 | |
| p-value for source × level | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | IL-1β | IL-10 | TNF-α |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CuCit | 20 | 0.85 | 1.52 | 1.06 |
| 100 | 1.06 | 1.34 | 0.85 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 1.12 | 1.14 | 1.06 |
| 100 | 1.07 | 1.21 | 0.95 | |
| SEM | 0.180 | 0.130 | 0.093 | |
| Main effect of source | ||||
| CuCit | 0.95 | 1.43 * | 0.95 | |
| CuSO4 | 1.09 | 1.18 * | 1.01 | |
| SEM | 0.12 | 0.095 | 0.068 | |
| Main effect of level | ||||
| 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 20 | 0.98 | 1.33 | 1.06 | |
| 100 | 1.06 | 1.28 | 0.89 | |
| SEM | 0.174 | 0.145 | 0.087 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | 0.479 | 0.334 | 0.625 | |
| p-value for source | 0.388 | 0.093 | 0.577 | |
| p-value for level | 0.900 | 0.216 | 0.201 | |
| p-value for source × level | 0.461 | 0.301 | 0.732 |
| Cu Source | Added Cu Level (mg/kg) | MDA (nmol/mg Prot) | T-SOD (U/mg Prot) | T-AOC (U/mg Prot) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0 | 1.03 a | 482.14 | 0.02 |
| CuCit | 20 | 0.32 d | 526.05 | 0.03 |
| 100 | 0.33 d | 512.17 | 0.04 | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | 0.65 b | 485.25 | 0.03 |
| 100 | 0.45 c | 483.46 | 0.04 | |
| SEM | 0.012 | 10.535 | 0.002 | |
| Main effect of source | ||||
| CuCit | 0.32 | 519.11 | 0.03 | |
| CuSO4 | 0.55 | 484.36 | 0.04 | |
| SEM | 0.033 | 8.167 | 0.001 | |
| Main effect of level | ||||
| 0 | 1.03 a | 482.14 | 0.02 c | |
| 20 | 0.49 b | 505.65 | 0.03 b | |
| 100 | 0.39 b | 497.82 | 0.04 a | |
| SEM | 0.074 | 14.006 | 0.002 | |
| p-value for individual treatments | <0.001 | 0.571 | 0.623 | |
| p-value for source | 0.001 | 0.011 | 0.844 | |
| p-value for level | <0.001 | 0.418 | <0.001 | |
| p-value for source × level | <0.001 | 0.619 | 0.638 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, Z.; Long, Q.; Wang, W.; Gu, Y.; Diao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, M. Effects of Copper Citrate and Copper Sulfate on Intestinal Health, Muscle Fiber Traits, and Antioxidant Capacity in Weaned Pigs. Animals 2026, 16, 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111615
Chen Z, Long Q, Wang W, Gu Y, Diao H, Zhang Y, Xu M. Effects of Copper Citrate and Copper Sulfate on Intestinal Health, Muscle Fiber Traits, and Antioxidant Capacity in Weaned Pigs. Animals. 2026; 16(11):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111615
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Zichen, Qingtao Long, Wenjing Wang, Yiren Gu, Hui Diao, Yong Zhang, and Meng Xu. 2026. "Effects of Copper Citrate and Copper Sulfate on Intestinal Health, Muscle Fiber Traits, and Antioxidant Capacity in Weaned Pigs" Animals 16, no. 11: 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111615
APA StyleChen, Z., Long, Q., Wang, W., Gu, Y., Diao, H., Zhang, Y., & Xu, M. (2026). Effects of Copper Citrate and Copper Sulfate on Intestinal Health, Muscle Fiber Traits, and Antioxidant Capacity in Weaned Pigs. Animals, 16(11), 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16111615
