Next Article in Journal
The Use of Coffee Cherry Pulp Extract as an Alternative to an Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Broiler Diets
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphology, Age, and Growth of Triplophysa strauchii in Sayram Lake, Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Urine-Derived Stromal/Stem Cells from Healthy Dogs and Dogs Affected by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Population Morphometry of Conger myriaster (Anguilliformes: Congridae) along the Coast of China: Implications for Population Structure and Fishery Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variability in Morphological Traits and Nutritional Profiles of Adult Eriocheir sinensis in Different Aquacultural Regions

1
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
2
Freshwater Fisheries Research Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210017, China
3
China Jiangsu Haorun Biological Industry Group Co., Ltd., Taizhou 225311, China
4
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(2), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020243
Submission received: 24 December 2024 / Revised: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 13 January 2025 / Published: 16 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morphological and Physiological Research on Fish: Second Edition)

Simple Summary

This study examines the differences in the body shape and nutrition of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) across various farming regions in China. Samples from six aquafarms showed differences in several morphological indices; however, these traits were not effective in distinguishing crabs from different regions. Nutritionally, this study found diverse levels of crude proteins, crude lipids, ash, and sugar in the muscle, hepatopancreas, and gonads. Notably, proteins were most abundant in reproductive tissues, while the hepatopancreas had the highest fat content. These crabs were rich in essential amino acids and unsaturated fatty acids, making them a good nutritional source. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified distinct categorizations of proximate composition, amino acids, and fatty acids in E. sinensis from various regions, which may be attributable to varied aquaculture conditions. This research enriches our understanding of regional variance in nutritional compositions of E. sinensis and enhances consumer awareness about the species.

Abstract

Eriocheir sinensis is a species of significant economic importance in China’s aquaculture industry. In order to investigate the variations in morphologic and nutritional profiles of farmed crabs across diverse farming regions, E. sinensis were collected from six aquafarms located in the primary cultivation areas in China. The findings revealed significant variations in specific morphological indices, but these are insufficient for clear regional distinction using PCA. Essential amino acid (EAA) levels varied by tissue and gender, with ovaries from the YY (Yongyan in Anhui province) group showing the highest levels, while the hepatopancreas in females from the JX (Jianxian in Jiangxi province) group had the lowest. The analysis of fatty acid contents revealed that muscles were rich in PUFAs, whereas MUFAs were dominant in the hepatopancreas and gonads. The fatty acid levels were significantly higher in ovaries than in testes, notably in the HZ (Huzhou in Zhejiang province), EZ (Ezhou in Hubei province), YY, and JX groups. Furthermore, the PCA based on proximate composition, amino acids, and fatty acids revealed distinct categorizations of E. sinensis from various regions. In conclusion, these findings highlight significant regional variations in the morphology and nutritional composition of farmed E. sinensis, suggesting the need for tailored aquaculture practices to optimize quality and output.

1. Introduction

Eriocheir sinensis is a key species in China’s aquaculture due to its economic significance, which stems from its widespread popularity as a food item celebrated for its delicious meat and high nutritional value. Successful advancements in artificial propagation technology for E. sinensis spurred significant progress in breeding practices throughout the 1990s [1]. Since 2002, the industry has transitioned into a phase of ecological and efficient crab farming [2,3]. Over the past two decades, a mature breeding technology system for E. sinensis has been established and continuously refined, with both its scale and popularity consistently expanding [4]. The annual production of E. sinensis showed a generally increasing trend from 2003 to 2023, reaching a production volume of 888, 629 tons in 2023 [5]. The major provinces involved in the cultivation of E. sinensis include Jiangsu, Hubei, Anhui, Liaoning, Shandong, Jiangxi, Heilongjiang, and Zhejiang. However, significant variations in farming conditions exist for E. sinensis from different regions. As a result, exploring regional variations in the nutritional composition of E. sinensis has garnered more attention.
Crustaceans are an excellent source of high-quality protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids, making them a valuable dietary choice. E. sinensis, in particular, is rich in protein, omega-3 fatty acids, and essential minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, and iron. It is worth noting that the hepatopancreas of the crab, along with its paste (testes) and roe (eggs), are also considered delicacies [6]. The quality of crabs is one of the key factors that influences their market price. It has been reported that nutritional analysis is a commonly employed method for assessing the quality of E. sinensis [7]. In nutritional composition, amino acid and fatty acid contents directly reflect the nutritional quality of E. sinensis and are closely associated with its flavor and texture. These parameters have been employed to assess the nutritional quality of E. sinensis in the Yangtze River Delta region [8]. The nutritional composition of E. sinensis can vary depending on several factors, including habitat [9], size [10], the status of gonadal development [11], diet composition [12,13], carapace color [14], etc. For example, Zhang et al. reported variations in the amino acid and fatty acid contents of E. sinensis at different growth stages in both female and male sexes [15,16]. Lots of studies have focused on nutritional differences between wild-caught and farmed crabs. Wu et al. indicated that wild-caught crabs showed superior qualities in terms of minerals, fatty acids, and flavor compared to rice-field crabs [17]. An analysis of the edible portions of E. sinensis from wild-caught crabs and two groups of pond-reared crabs revealed that wild-caught specimens possessed the highest umami intensity, total free amino acid content, and key aromatic compounds [18]. A comparison of wild adult male E. sinensis muscles from five different rivers demonstrated significant variations in meat yield and flavor profiles among the geographic populations [19]. These variations might be attributed to genetic factors and the environmental conditions where each species develops [17,20,21]. Additionally, Wang et al. compared the nutritional variations of E. sinensis from four northern geographic regions under different farming models (paddies, lakes, and ponds) [22]. In the study of Mei et al., E. sinensis from rice fields were compared with those cultured in ponds based on several indexes, including fatty acids, and demonstrated that both groups exhibited good nutritional values, though rice-field crabs exhibited better qualities [23]. Meanwhile, Shang et al. examined the quality of E. sinensis from Yangtze River and Yellow River populations cultured in ponds by measuring their proximate composition, fatty acid, and amino acid profiles and found that there were some differences in the fatty acid and amino acid compositions [24]. Despite the many literatures available, there is still a lack of systematic research concerning regional variations in the quality of pond-reared E. sinensis across major aquaculture regions in China.
Across various regions, the biochemical composition of farmed E. sinensis may differ, and furthermore, due to variances in growth environments and diet compositions, their morphological characteristics may also vary. Morphological traits are an important parameter for species identification and an important improvement index in breeding work [25,26]. Currently, studies on the morphological traits of wild river crabs are extensive [25,27]. He et al. discussed the morphological differences between the populations of E. sinensis in the Liaohe River and Oujiang River [28]. Lu et al. showed that there were significant differences in the morphology and biochemical composition of wild E. sinensis populations from the Yangtze River, Liaohe River, and Yellow River [29]. Studies also indicated that when wild crabs from different river systems were cultivated under uniform conditions, these differences tended to diminish [30,31]. However, research is still limited on the morphological characteristics among farmed E. sinensis in diverse environmental conditions.
This study focuses on adult pond-reared E. sinensis across various regions in China. Our objective is to analyze variations in the morphometric features and biochemical composition of three edible parts (muscle, hepatopancreas, and gonad) of E. sinensis from six aquafarms in different provinces of China. Furthermore, we assessed the categorization of crabs based on amino acids and fatty acids using PCA, supporting the development of a potential geographical indication label for E. sinensis. This study will provide a scientific basis for optimizing farming practices of E. sinensis and offer a reference for consumers in choosing crab products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of thirty samples (♀:♂ = 1:1) of sexually mature and physically healthy individuals were collected from each aquafarm located in the primary crab-producing regions of China. These areas included locations in Panjin, Liaoning (122.08° N, 41.00° E; PJ), Changzhou, Jiangsu (120.04° N, 31.00° E; CZ), Jinxian, Jiangxi (119.78° N, 31.80° E; JX), Yongyan, Anhui (118.13° N, 33.05° E; YY), Huzhou, Zhejiang (116.29° N, 28.38° E; HZ), and Ezhou, Hubei (114.73° N, 30.35° E; EZ). The information about the origin, body weight, and carapace length of the samples under investigation is detailed in Table 1. The sampling of the crabs in the PJ group occurred in September, while the CZ, EZ, and YY groups were sampled in October, and the HZ and JX populations were sampled in November. All samples were collected during the sales season, when sexual maturity was high in the relevant district, to ensure a consistent developmental stage for our study.
The sampled individuals were anesthetized via ice bath. Subsequently, their morphometric attributes were measured, and they were dissected to collect samples of the hepatopancreas, gonad, and muscle. All tissues were stored separately at −80 °C for further biochemical analysis. Before conducting biochemical analysis, five samples of each tissue from the same sex were mixed together to form one replicate. In total, three replicates of each tissue from the same sex were prepared. Each mixed sample was then ground into a pulp separately.

2.2. Measurements of Morphometric Attributes

The morphometric attributes, including carapace length, carapace width, body height, and others, were obtained using a Vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. The measurements adhered to the Chinese National Standard for Germplasm Identification for Eriocheir sinensis (GB/T 19957-2005) [32]. The measurement parameters were as follows: length of carapace (C1), width of carapace (C2), width of frontal (C3), body thickness (T), width of the first anterolateral tooth (C4), length of the posterior half of carapace (C5), the longest dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg (L1), the frontier dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg (L2), and the dactylus length of the last ambulatory leg (L3). Distance measures applied to the back of carapace and ambulatory legs of E. sinensis are shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Measurements of Proximate Composition

To determine the moisture content, the samples were dried using a vacuum freeze-dryer (FD-1A-50, Biocoll, Beijing, China) at a temperature of −50 °C until a constant weight was achieved. To determine the crude protein content, the Kjeldahl method was employed and the nitrogen–protein conversion factor was 6.25. To determine the crude lipid content, the Soxhlet extraction method was employed, utilizing petroleum ether as the solvent. The ash content was measured by burning the samples at a temperature of 550 °C.

2.4. Amino Acid Analysis and Assessments of Protein Quality

The amino acid content is determined after pre-treatment using the acid hydrolysis method [33]. Briefly, 0.1 g of samples were homogenized, and 6.0 mol·L−1 HCl was immediately added. The solvent was vacuumed and then reacted at 130 °C for 7 h. The hydrolysates were freeze-dried and dissolved in 0.02 mol·L−1 HCl. The solution was analyzed using a Hitachi 835-50 automatic amino acid analyzer (Hitachi 835-50, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a column (Hitachi custom ion exchange resin no. 2619) for physiological fluid analysis. The column temperature was set to 57 °C, and the post-column reaction with ninhydrin solution equipment was maintained at 130 °C. The amino acid content was shown as the percentage of a particular amino acid to the sample wet weight (mg·g−1 tissue wet weight).
The essential amino acid score (EAAS) was calculated using a formula based on the report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) about amino acid requirements for adult maintenance [34], as described by Millward [35].
EAAS = mg   of   essential   amino   acid   in   1   g   of   test   protein mg   of   essential   amino   acid   in   reference   pattern × 100  
The amino acid chemical score (CS) was calculated using the method described by Seligson and Mackey [36], which compares the relative content of essential amino acids (EAAs) in sample proteins to that in standard egg protein.

2.5. Fatty Acids Analysis

Total lipids were extracted following the method described previously [37,38]. Briefly, mixtures of crab tissues were subjected to diethyl ether for 6 h. Next, the resultant crab lipid was mixed with a potassium hydroxide–methanol solution and incubated at 70 °C for 1 h to conduct saponification. Fatty acid methyl esters were gained using 12.5% (w/v) sulfuric acid–methanol reagent and separated using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Agilent Technologies, 7890A, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation was performed on an HP-88 (100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 μm) column. Peaks were identified by comparing the retention times with fatty acid methyl ester standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China). Quantitative analysis of each fatty acid component was carried out using the peak area normalization method.

2.6. Principal Component Analysis

Morphological proportion traits and amino acid content in both male and female crabs were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) using the PCA online tool (Omicshare, http://www.omicshare.com/tools/, accessed on 23 October 2024). The parameters were analyzed by default settings.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All results were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). The statistical tests were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software. All data and significant difference analyses in proximate chemical composition, amino acid analysis, and fatty acid analysis were conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), multiple comparisons were handled using Tukey’s multiple comparison test, and p < 0.05 was regarded as statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. The Morphological Parameters

The morphological proportion traits are listed in Table 2. Among male crabs, the CZ population exhibited notably higher values for T/C1 compared to other populations, whereas the HZ population had the lowest values. Additionally, the PJ population had significantly higher values for L3/C1 than other populations, while the YY population had the smallest values. However, there were no significant differences in C2/C1 among the populations. In female crabs, the PJ population had significantly higher values for C3/C1, C4/C1, and L3/C1 than the other populations but had the lowest values for C5/C1. Conversely, there were no significant differences in the ratios of C2/C1 and L2/C1 among the populations. PCA was conducted to analyze the morphological proportion traits of male and female crabs. For male crabs, PC1 explained 22.1% of the total variance, and PC2 explained 17.3%. The cumulative contribution rate of PC1 and PC2 was 39.4%. In the results for female crabs, PC1 had a contribution rate of 28.7%, and PC2 had 18.1%. The cumulative contribution rate of PC1 and PC2 was 46.8%. According to the PCA plot (Figure 2), there was considerable overlap among the scatter points of each group, whether they were male or female, indicating that crabs from various cultured populations cannot be effectively distinguished. The overlaps indicated that certain parameters may be resistant to variations in environmental conditions or farming practices.

3.2. Proximate Composition

It is evident that there were variations in proximate composition of the edible tissues among the six populations, except for the ash content in male and female hepatopancreases (Table 3). In muscles, relatively high crude protein contents were observed in male crabs from HZ and female from YY (p < 0.05). Notably, the crude lipid contents in hepatopancreases were higher than other tissues, ranging from 21.73 to 41.53 g/100 g in male crabs and from 27.80 to 53.20 g/100 g in female crabs. Among male crabs, the HZ and YY groups show higher crude lipid contents compared to other groups (p < 0.05). Similarly, in female crabs, the YY, JX, and HZ groups exhibit higher crude lipid contents than other groups (p < 0.05). In female ovaries, the contents of crude proteins and crude lipids were much higher than that in testes. The highest values of crude proteins in ovaries were observed in the YY, HZ, and JX groups, while in testes, the highest values were observed in the PJ and EZ groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, the highest sugar contents were significantly higher in muscles and hepatopancreases from the HZ group, while in testes and ovaries, the highest values were detected in the CZ and YY groups (p < 0.05), respectively. The PCA revealed distinct categorizations of proximate composition in crabs from various regions (Figure 3). The cumulative contribution rates of PC1 and PC2 were from 76.0% to 84.2%, of which the contribution of PC1 was from 43.8% to 57.9%. In the muscle tissue of male crabs, distinct profiles were observed among PJ, HZ, and JX groups (Figure 3A). Similarly, in female crab muscle tissue, samples from JS, HZ, and PJ exhibited clear differentiation (Figure 3B). The male hepatopancreases showed significant variations in proximate compositions among the HZ, PJ, YY, and JX groups (Figure 3C). In testes, the proximate compositions profiles of HZ and JS could be distinct from others (Figure 3E), while the ovary profiles from HZ, JX, and YY showed clear distinctions (Figure 3F).

3.3. Variation in Amino Acids Composition

Except for Tryptophane, which was not determined due to its destruction during the acid-hydrolysis process, a total of 17 amino acids were detected in the six groups of E. sinensis (Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6). These include seven essential amino acids (EAA), two semi-essential amino acids (SEAA), and eight non-essential amino acids (NEAA). Glu, Arg, Asp, Ala, Lys, Leu, and Gly were found to have higher contents in the three edible parts, while Cys, Met, and His had lower contents. Glu was determined to be the most abundant amino acid in the three tissues, with concentrations of 1.76–2.42 g/100 g, 0.53–1.18 g/100 g, and 1.82–3.20 g/100 g in the muscle, hepatopancreas, and gonads, respectively.
In muscles (Table 4), the levels of total amino acids (TAAs) were highest in the EZ group and lowest in the PJ group for both male and female crabs (p < 0.05). Similarly, the levels of EAAs were highest in the HZ group and lowest in the PJ group for both male and female crabs (p < 0.05). It is worth noting that in male crabs, the levels of EAAs in the HZ, EZ, YY, and CZ groups were significantly higher than in the PJ and JX groups (p < 0.05). In female crabs, the levels of EAAs and TAAs in the HZ, EZ, and YY groups were significantly higher than in other groups (p < 0.05). The EAA/TAA ratio in male crabs ranged from 0.34 to 0.36, while in female crabs, it ranged from 0.34 to 0.38. The EAA/TAA ratio in the HZ group was significantly higher than other groups in both male and female crabs (p < 0.05).
Table 5 shows the amino acids composition in the hepatopancreas. In male crabs, the TAA content in the EZ, HZ, and PJ groups was significantly higher than in other groups, while in female crabs, the TAA content in the HZ group was significantly higher compared to the other five groups (p < 0.05). In terms of EAA content, male crabs showed the highest levels in the PJ and EZ groups, while in female crabs, the HZ group had the highest EAA content. In male crabs, the EAA/TAA ratio was significantly higher in the CZ and JX groups compared to other groups (p < 0.05), while in female crabs, the JX group had a significantly higher EAA/TAA ratio compared to other groups (p < 0.05).
The amino acids composition differed significantly between the testes and ovaries, with the latter exhibiting higher amino acids content than the former. In testes, TAAs of the YY, CZ, and EZ groups was significantly higher than that of the JX groups (p < 0.05), while there were no significant differences among the other groups. In the testes of crabs across six groups, the YY population had the highest EAA content, while the JX group had the lowest. The EAA/TAA ratio was significantly higher in HZ compared to PJ and EZ groups (p < 0.05). It is worth noting that the TAA content in the ovaries was the highest compared to other tissues, with all groups exhibiting levels exceeding 22 g/100 g. The highest content was observed in YY group (24.28 g/100 g), which was significantly higher than the lowest content in the CZ group (22.32 g/100 g, p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found among the other groups. The YY and JX groups had significantly higher EAA content compared to EZ group. The EAA/TAA ratios for the JX, CZ, and HZ groups exceeded 0.40, with JX and CZ displaying significantly higher ratios compared to other groups (p < 0.05). The EZ group exhibited the lowest ratio among all groups.
The amino acids contents per gram of protein of the three tissues are shown in Table S1. The EAAS and CS are shown in Tables S2 and S3, respectively. The EAAS of muscles showed that the values of most amino acids were above 1 except for sulfuric amino acids (SAA, methionine + cysteine). The scoring for aromatic amino acids (AAA, phenylalanine + tyrosine) was the highest, ranging from 1.83 to 2.04. In male crab muscles, the limiting AAs in the PJ, HZ, EZ, and YY groups were SAAs, while in female crab muscles, SAAs were limited in the CZ, EZ, and HZ groups. The CS values for SAAs and valine were generally below 1 (Table S2). On the contrary, the highest CS value was observed in lysine (1.45–4.50) (Table S2). In the hepatopancreas, EAAS values of all amino acids were above 1 (Table S2), while CS values of isoleucine, leucine, and SAAs from males in the HZ, EZ, and YY groups were below 1 (Table S3). The CS of SAAs in female hepatopancreases from the HZ group was the lowest (0.70). In testes, threonine had the highest EAAS values (3.39–3.93) and CS values (2.12–2.46), while SAAs had the lowest EAAS (0.63–0.93) and CS (0.43–0.63), which were much lower than 1. The CS values of valine (0.69–0.83) in testes were also far below 1. In ovaries, the EAAS and CS of all amino acids were above 1.
The PCA revealed distinct categorizations of amino acids in crabs from various regions (Figure 4). The contribution variance rates of PC1 were from 52.0% to 78.8% in different tissues, while PC2 were from 11.8% to 33.0%. The rates of cumulative contribution of PC1 and PC2 ranged from 78.3% to 92.6%. In the muscle tissue of male crabs, distinct profiles were observed from the EZ, PJ, JS, and JX groups (Figure 4A). Similarly, in female crabs’ muscle tissue, samples from EZ, JS, HZ, and YY exhibited clear differentiation (Figure 4B). The male hepatopancreas showed significant variations in amino acid compositions among HZ, EZ, YY, and JX groups (Figure 4C). In the female hepatopancreas, EZ, PJ, and HZ could be distinguished (Figure 4D). In testes, the amino acid profiles of EZ could be distinguished from others (Figure 4E), while the ovary profiles from EZ, JX, and YY showed clear distinctions (Figure 4F).

3.4. Variation in Fatty Acids Profiles

The composition of fatty acids varied significantly across different regions, tissues, and genders. Specifically, this study identified 14 fatty acids in muscle tissues (Table 7), 28 in the hepatopancreas (Table 8), 14 in testes, and 22 in ovaries (Table 9).
In muscles (Table 7), four saturated fatty acids (SFAs) were identified, with C16:0 being the most abundant. Four monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) were identified, with C18:1n9c being the most abundant. Additionally, six types of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were identified, with C20:4n6 and C18:2n6c showing the highest concentrations. In male crabs, the highest concentrations of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs were recorded in the HZ group. Conversely, the lowest levels of SFAs and MUFAs were observed in the PJ group, while the lowest concentration of PUFAs was found in the EZ group. In female crabs, the SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs were highest in the JX group. Conversely, the lowest concentrations of SFAs were observed in the PJ group, MUFAs in the HZ group, and PUFAs in the EZ group. n-3 PUFAs were more abundant than n-6 PUFAs in the muscle tissues of both males and females, with the JX group exhibiting the highest levels.
The hepatopancreas had the richest diversity and concentration of fatty acids (Table 8). Twelve SFAs were detected, with C16:0 exhibiting the highest content. Six MUFAs were identified, with C18:1n9c being the most prevalent. Ten PUFAs were detected, with C18:2n6c having the highest concentration. In male crabs, the HZ group had the highest value of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs, the CZ group had the lowest value of SFAs and MUFAs, and PUFAs were the lowest in the PJ group. The content of EPA was highest in the YY group, followed by the JX group. In female crabs, the EZ group contained the highest levels of SFAs and MUFAs, whereas the lowest were observed in the CZ group. For PUFAs, the highest content was in the YY group, with the lowest again in the CZ group. The content of n-3 PUFAs was higher in the YY group compared to other groups. The concentration of n-6 PUFAs was highest in the HZ group among males, whereas both the JX and HZ groups exhibited higher values in females.
The ovaries of female crabs contained a higher diversity and concentration of fatty acids compared to the testes of male crabs (Table 9). The testes comprised four types of SFAs, five types of MUFAs, and five types of PUFAs. The HZ population exhibited the highest concentrations of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs. Conversely, the JX population had the lowest SFA content, while the PJ population had the lowest levels of MUFAs and PUFAs. In contrast, the ovaries contain ten types of SFAs, four types of MUFAs, and eight types of PUFAs, among which C16:0, C18:1n9c, and C18:2n6c were present in the highest amounts of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs, respectively. The total contents of MUFAs and PUFAs were higher than that of SFAs. The highest content of n-3 and n-6 PUFAs were both in the HZ group (p < 0.05).
The PCA revealed distinct categorizations of fatty acids in crabs from various regions (Figure 5). The contribution variance rates of PC1 were from 37.0% to 68.5% in different tissues, while PC2 were from 18.0% to 30.5%, with cumulative contribution from 60.2% to 87.7%. Specifically, in the muscle tissue of male crabs, distinct profiles were observed for fatty acids from the JS, YY, HZ, and EZ groups (Figure 5A). Similarly, the fatty acid profiles in female crabs’ muscle tissue clearly differentiated samples from EZ, PJ, JS, JX, and YY (Figure 5B). The hepatopancreas of females showed significant variations in fatty acid compositions among PJ and JS groups (Figure 5C), while in males, distinct profiles were observed from PJ, JS, and YY (Figure 5D). In testes (Figure 5E), the fatty acid profiles of PJ were distinctly different, while the ovary profiles from all the groups showed clear distinctions (Figure 5F).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Effect of Different Regions on the Morphological Parameters

Morphological methods, which distinguish populations based on morphological differences among groups, are traditional approaches in taxonomy [39]. Reports suggested that wild crab populations from different regions could be distinct enough by morphological characteristics [28]. However, these differences did not persist in the offspring generations of artificial culture [40,41]. In our study, there were significant differences in certain measurement indicators among specific groups; for example, L3/C1 and C4/C1 in female crabs from PJ groups were significantly different from others. The discrepancies might be influenced by genetic factors, as the crabs bred in the PJ group belong to the Liaohe River system, while others come from the Yangtze River system. In addition, another reason for the morphological variation in the PJ group could be due to the higher latitude, which results in lower accumulated temperatures over the growing season [42]. Yet, PCA showed significant overlap in the scatter plots of principal components among individuals from different groups. Also, the cumulative contribution rate of PC1 and PC2 falling below 50% indicated that they were insufficient for explaining the main variability in the data, thereby failing to effectively distinguish different groups. This implies that the morphological differences among the six surveyed crab lineages were minor, complicating their distinction through traditional morphological identification methods. Our results were supported by previous studies that the morphological traits’ differences in cultured adult E. sinensis between various regions or selected breeding lines are relatively minor [43].

4.2. The Effect of Different Regions on Basic Nutrients in the Three Edible Parts

E. sinensis is a nutritious and flavorful freshwater food that is low in fat and calories yet high in protein. Its main edible tissues are muscles, hepatopancreases, and gonads [22]. This study revealed regional variations in ash content, with notable differences among tissues. For instance, the PJ group exhibited the highest ash content in muscle tissue, whereas the hepatopancreas showed no significant differences. This variance may be attributed to differences in culture environments, which potentially influence the transformation and absorption of inorganic salts and minerals [44]. The content of crud protein was the highest in ovaries, followed by testes and muscles, but the lowest in hepatopancreases. Similar results were also reported for E. sinensis reared in carbonate-alkalinity water [45]. The variability in protein content in muscle tissues, notably higher in HZ males and YY females, may suggest regional differences in available food or variations in water quality. This observation was supported by previous research indicating that environmental factors significantly influence muscle composition in aquatic species [46]. The content of crude lipids was the highest in hepatopancreases, but the lowest in muscles. The results were in accordance with previous reports [17,20]. Lipids are the major energy reserve in the hepatopancreas and can act as a source of nutrients for mobilization, aligning with former researches which associated high lipid reserves in the hepatopancreas with reproductive health and the survival strategies of crustaceans [47,48]. Regarding sexual dimorphism, female gonads exhibited higher levels of protein and fat content. This distinction is primarily due to the necessity for ovaries to accumulate substantial nutrients to support and energize embryonic development [49]. Additionally, sugar levels were highest in the reproductive tissues and lowest in the muscle tissues, supporting the concept of adaptive metabolic responses. These sugars are critical for reproductive processes such as gametogenesis, fertilization, and embryo development during the breeding season [50]. What is more, the sweet taste may be one of the factors that contributes to the popularity of testes and ovaries among consumers. Moreover, PCA revealed the distinction of E. sinensis from different regions on the bases of proximate composition profiles. The combined contribution rates of PC1 and PC2 were consistently equal to or greater than 76.0% in all the tissues, indicating that these two principal components were sufficient to explain the main variability, thereby effectively distinguishing different groups. Numerous studies have demonstrated that variations in the proximate composition among different groups can be attributed to differences in aquaculture conditions. Factors such as water quality [51] and microorganisms [52] have been proven to influence the biochemical compositions of aquatic animals. Wu et al. reported significant differences in the proximate composition of various tissues of E. sinensis when comparing wild conditions to rice farming environments [17]. Feeding practices may also contribute to variations in the proximate composition among different groups. Previous research has demonstrated that a high-quality diet can enhance the nutritional value of male E. sinensis [53,54]. Additionally, the maturity period significantly influences the nutritional composition of the gonads and hepatopancreases [13,15,55].

4.3. The Effect of Different Regions on Amino Acids Contents

Amino acids are essential not only for the physiological functions like the growth and health of E. sinensis but also contribute significantly to the flavor profile [56]. The type, quantity, and ratio of EAAs serve as crucial indicators of the nutritional quality of dietary proteins. According to the ideal protein pattern recommended by the FAO/WHO, a protein is considered high-quality if the ratio of EAA/TAA is approximately 0.40 and the ratio of EAA/NEAA exceeds 0.60 [57]. In this study, the proportion of EAA/TAA in muscles from six regions ranged between 0.34 and 0.38. The ratios of EAA/NEAA were above 0.60, except for female crabs in the PJ group (0.53). In the hepatopancreas, the proportions of EAA/TAA were approximately 0.40, except in the HZ and EZ groups, and the EAA/NEAA ratios were all above 0.60. Noticeably, though the crude protein content of the testes is high, the proportions of EAA/TAA were below 0.40 (ranging from 0.33 to 0.34), and the EAA/NEAA ratios were below 0.6 (ranging from 0.53 to 0.57). On the contrary, in the ovaries, the proportion of EAA/TAA was above 0.4 (0.40–0.41) and EAA/NEAA was above 0.6 (0.77–0.83). This indicates that E. sinensis can provide high-quality protein for human consumption, with specimens from the JX region being of higher protein quality.
The EAAS and CS are primary indicators used to compare and analyze the composition of essential amino acids in animal muscle tissue and to evaluate protein nutritional value [58]. The average EAAS of the muscles, hepatopancreases, and gonads from the six groups exceeded the requirements of the FAO standard model (>1.0), indicating that the amino acid content could meet the human nutrition standards of the human body [11,12]. The average CSs of the three tissues were approximately or above 1.0, but in testes, the CSs of Val, AAA, and Lys were below 1.0, which were identified as the limiting amino acids. It is noteworthy that the values of EAA/TAA, EAA/NEAA, EAAS, and CS all suggest that the ovary is capable of providing high-quality protein for consumption. This aligns with the fact that female crabs are indeed more sought-after among consumers and therefore command a higher market value than male crabs [59]. Additionally, these indicators suggested that the ovarian nutrition in the HZ group would be better. Moreover, the PCA uncovered that E. sinensis from different regions could be distinguished based on their amino acids compositions. The cumulative contribution rates of PC1 and PC2 were above 78.0%, indicating that these two principal components could explain the majority of variance. The observed variations in amino acids profiles of E. sinensis across different regions suggest that environmental factors or farming practices significantly influence its nutritional composition [60]. Tian et al. conducted analyses on E. sinensis from six distinct lakes and identified significant differences in the amino acid composition of the muscle tissue, potentially linked to geographical isolation [61]. Similarly, the free amino acid profiles in the muscles of E. sinensis showed significant differences between rice farming and pond farming, suggesting that cultivation methods markedly affect nutritional content [62]. Moreover, these variations in nutritional composition could be associated with different feeding practices. For instance, crabs fed a natural diet showed higher levels of EAAs in muscle compared to those given commercial feed [63].

4.4. The Effect of Different Regions on Fatty Acids Composition

The fatty acid composition is crucial for exploring E. sinensis’s physiological mechanisms and nutritional properties [6]. E. sinensis showed higher levels of PUFAs compared to SFAs and MUFAs in muscle tissue. Conversely, in the hepatopancreas and gonads, the levels of MUFAs were the highest. Similar to the results reported by Long et al. [64] and Ye et al. [65]. This study displayed that C16:0 was the dominant SFA, C18:1n9c was the primary MUFA, and C18:2n6c was the predominant PUFA across the muscle, hepatopancreas, and gonad tissues. These findings are consistent with previous reports on E. sinensis [22,65,66]. PUFAs are known for their beneficial effects on health, particularly the n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, classified as essential fatty acids [67]. The n-3 and n-6 fatty acids have various physiological functions, including cholesterol management, heart health, anti-inflammatory responses, and maintaining cell membrane integrity [68,69]. The consumption of long-chain n-3 fatty acids C20:5n3 (eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA) and C22:6n3 (docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) was recommended by several international organizations and health agencies due to their numerous health benefits [70,71]. In our study, C20:5n3 and C22:6n3 were the most abundant PUFAs in E. sinensis. However, the amount of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids varies among different tissues and between sexes, reflecting the distinct metabolic needs of each tissue, which is consistent with observations in the Cancer pagurus [72]. This study further revealed that the contents of n-3 and n-6 were highest in the hepatopancreas among the three tissues. In the hepatopancreas, the highest n-3 values were from the YY group, while the highest n-6 contents were found in males from the HZ group and females from the JX group. The major differences between sexes were detected in gonads, with ovaries having higher n-3 and n-6 contents than testes. The highest n-3 and n-6 values in ovaries were found in the HZ group. These results suggest that the n-3 and n-6 were influenced by farming regions and gender. This suggestion is supported by a previous study where the key fatty acids ARA and EPA (C20:4n6) exhibited significant differences in E. sinensis from four regions [62]. Meanwhile, the differences in key fatty acids between male and female E. sinensis have also been widely reported [73].
This study also found that the total fatty acids in the hepatopancreas were much higher compared to other tissues. High fatty acids reserves in the hepatopancreas are closely associated with the reproductive health and survival strategies of crustaceans [74]. Beyond its primary metabolic functions, the hepatopancreas also acts as a crucial energy reserve, capable of being mobilized in response to food shortages, environmental stress, or reproductive needs [75,76]. In this study, the total fatty acids in male hepatopancreases from the EZ, YY and JX groups were higher than other groups, while female hepatopancreases from the HZ, EZ and YY groups were much higher, consistent with the values of crude lipids. These data indicated that farming regions affect the fatty acid content in the hepatopancreas, further influencing its nutritional value [77].
It is noteworthy that the fatty acid compositions were more abundant and the contents significantly higher in the ovaries compared to the testes. The phenomenon could be linked to the distinct reproductive roles and needs of male and female crabs [78]. The ovaries require a larger amount of fatty acids compared to the testes to support the development and maturation of eggs, which are lipid-rich cells designed to nourish the embryo after fertilization [79,80]. The total fatty acids in the ovaries were higher in the HZ, EZ, YY, and JX groups, suggesting enhanced fertility in female E. sinensis from these regions. Furthermore, the PCA results revealed distinct variations in the fatty acid profiles of E. sinensis across multiple regional locations, highlighting the profound impact of farming environments on the nutritional components. The clear categorization of crabs based on proximate compositions, amino acids, and fatty acids using PCA underscores the possibility of developing a geographical indication label for E. sinensis. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies that characterized the Procambarus clarkii from different regions in China based on amino acids and fatty acids [81].
This study assessed the geographical variations in morphological traits and nutritional profiles of adult E. sinensis across six major aquaculture regions in China, generating comprehensive data valuable for evaluating the nutritional quality of E. sinensis from different geographic populations. However, the research also faced several limitations: (1) This study did not consider specific environmental factors and feeding practices across different farming regions, which may affect interpretations related to geographic variations in the results. Future research should incorporate external variables such as water quality, temperature, and diet to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the nutritional quality of different tissues from farmed E. sinensis. (2) This study focused primarily on the composition and content of amino acids and fatty acids to assess the nutritional value of E. sinensis. However, future research could explore other important parameters, such as mineral compositions, flavor compounds, and volatile compounds, which also contribute to nutritional value. (3) This study only collected samples from six regions. However, in China, E. sinensis is cultivated in 28 provinces, thus the data obtained in this study are limited. Additionally, the sampling was conducted in a specific region, influenced by local aquaculture practices and environment conditions. Therefore, the findings of this study are representative only of the particular area.

5. Conclusions

This study of E. sinensis across different aquaculture regions in China highlighted the morphological and nutritional diversity within this species. Although morphological indices did not conclusively differentiate regions via PCA, significant variations were found in proximate composition, essential amino acids, and fatty acids among the crabs from various locations. Particularly, regional variations in nutrient profiles, such as higher protein content in ovaries, predominant lipids in the hepatopancreas, and a richer presence of PUFAs in muscle tissues, were distinct. The PCA based on nutritional contents could categorize E. sinensis from various farmed regions. Furthermore, the EAAS and CS of amino acids, along with high levels of n-3 and n-6 PUFAs in E. sinensis, indicated that they were nutritionally beneficial for human consumption. In conclusion, the research offered scientific references for the nutritional evaluation of cultured E. sinensis in China. These regional variations in tissue-specific nutritional quality can provide valuable insights for aquaculturists into the nutritional advantages of their products. Such knowledge can prompt adjustments in dietary or breeding environments to enhance aquaculture practices. Additionally, these results can act as a significant biomarker for determining the geographical origin of aquatic products, thereby providing more comprehensive information to consumers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15020243/s1: Table S1: Amino acid content per gram of protein; Table S2: The essential amino acid scores (EAAS) of different tissues of adult Eriocher sinensis from six different regions; Table S3: The chemical score (CS) of different tissues of adult Eriocher sinensis from six different regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.F. and Y.T.; methodology, J.L.; software, J.Z.; validation, W.F., G.H. and Y.X.; formal analysis, G.J.; investigation, Q.H. and W.F.; resources, Y.T.; data curation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.F.; review and editing, Y.T.; visualization, Y.X.; supervision, Y.T.; project administration, Y.T.; funding acquisition, Y.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32202966); Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province (No. BE2022360); and Jiangsu Revitalization of Seed Industry (No. JBGS [2021]031).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (LAECFFRC-2021-9-12; date: 12 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data in this study are contained within the main manuscript and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Guoan Hua was employed by the Jiangsu Haorun Biological Industry Group Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, J.; Xu, W.; Lu, K. Preliminary discussions on some problems about artificial propagation of E. sinensis in earth ponds. J. Zhejiang Coll. Fish. 1995, 03, 177–181. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng, Y.; Wu, X.; Yang, X.; Hines, A.H. Current trends in hatchery techniques and stock enhancement for Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir japonica sinensis. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2008, 16, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Liang, X.; Cui, Y. Stocking models of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir japonica sinensis) in Yangtze lakes. Aquaculture 2006, 255, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Ma, X. Ecological Aquaculture of Chinese Mitten Crab; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. China Fishery Statistics Yearbook; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Sui, L.; Yang, X.; Nan, T.; Wang, J. Biochemical composition of pond-reared and lake-stocked Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis (H. Milne-Edwards) broodstock. Aquac. Res. 2007, 38, 1459–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, X.; Han, G.; Ma, B.; Song, J.; Mu, Y.; Meng, D. Differences of Nutritional Components in Chinese Eriocheir sinensis: Research Progress. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2019, 35, 122–128. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Q.Q. Nutritional Quality Analysis of Listed Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in Yangtze River Delta. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, D.; Jiang, X.; Zu, L.; Zhou, W.; Luo, M.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, X. A comparative evaluation of the nutritional quality of three wild populations of female mitten crabs (Eriocheir sensu stricto) in northern China. Crustaceana 2021, 94, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Wu, X.; Long, X.; Zhu, W.; Ma, T.; Cheng, Y. Nutritional quality of different grades of adult male chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 944–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, X.; Wang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, X. Growth performance, gonad development and nutritional composition of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis selected for growth and different maturity time. Aquaculture 2020, 523, 735194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yi, X.; Gao, J.; Li, L.; Du, J.; Nie, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, G. Effects of fattening diets on the nutritional quality and flavor of the adult female Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Aquac. Rep. 2022, 25, 101223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, X.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, H.; Liu, M.; Wu, N.; Pan, J.; Luo, M.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Y. Fattening culture improves the gonadal development and nutritional quality of male Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Aquaculture 2020, 518, 734865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Q.; Zu, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wade, N.M.; Liu, J.; Wu, X. Carapace color affects carotenoid composition and nutritional quality of the Chinese mitten crab, Eriochier sinensis. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 126, 109286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, B.; Wang, W.; Zhu, R.; Zhang, D.; Wang, N.; Zheng, N.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Wan, J.; Chen, Y.; et al. Comparative study on growth performance and edible portion nutritional composition of male Eriocheir sinensis at different growth stages in rice-crab culture systems. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 130, 106156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, B.; Fang, W.; Zhu, R.; Wang, N.; Yao, Q.; Liu, H.; Wan, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D. Comparative Study on Growth Index and Nutritional Quality of Female Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis Selected at Different Growth Periods in Rice-Crab Culture Systems. Aquac. Nutr. 2023, 2023, 4805919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, H.; Ge, M.; Chen, H.; Jiang, S.; Lin, L.; Lu, J. Comparison between the nutritional qualities of wild-caught and rice-field male Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 117, 108663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, S.; He, Y.U.; Wang, Y.; Tao, N.; Wu, X.; Wang, X.; Qiu, W.; Ma, M. Comparison of flavour qualities of three sourced Eriocheir sinensis. Food Chem. 2016, 200, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, M.; Qu, Z.; Shi, W.; Wang, X.; Wu, X. A comparative study on the flavour of wild Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) along the eastern coast of China. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 127, 105949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.; Luo, L.; Zhang, R.; Guo, K.; Zhang, X.; Kong, L.; Zhao, Z. Biochemical composition and quality of wild-caught adult mitten crabs from three river basins. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 110, 104574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, J.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Huang, Z.; Cheng, Y. Comparison of the culture performance and profitability of wild-caught and captive pond-reared Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) juveniles reared in grow-out ponds: Implications for seed selection and genetic selection programs. Aquaculture 2014, 434, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Y. Gonadal development and biochemical composition of Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) from four sources. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 1066–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mei, J.; Liang, X.; Yu, Y.; Lang, Y.; Li, X. The comparison and analysis of nutritional qualities of Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) in rice field and pond culture modes. Food Chem. X 2023, 20, 100937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shang, M.; Tang, C.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, Y. Nutritional quality of adult Eriocheir sinensis from the Yangtze River and Yellow River populations cultured in ponds at the Yellow River estuary area. Aquac. Fish. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, W.; Xu, C.; Zhang, W.B.; Ma, X.Z. Comparative studies on morphological differences among four local populations of mitten crab. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2007, 23, 648–653. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, X.A.; Ma, A.J.; Zhuang, Z.M. Judgment of selection index of morphological traits in Fugu rubripes. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2012, 33, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, Q.; Li, X.D.; Dai, W.; Jin, T.T.; Li, L.; Wang, X.M. The morphological discrimination of populations of mitten crab in different river systems. Fish. Sci. 2006, 25, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  28. He, J.; Xu, P.; Zhu, J. Morphological variations and species validity of Eriocheir sinensis in the north and south drainage systems of China. Trans. Oceanol. Limnol. 2009, 3, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu, Y.; Wu, X.; He, J.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; Liu, N.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y. Comparative studies of the morphology and biochemical composition of wild juvenile Chinese mitten crabs from the Yangtze River, Yellow River and Liaohe River systems. J. Fish. Sci. China 2016, 23, 382–395. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xue, J.; Liu, H.; Jiang, T.; Chen, X.; Yang, J. Shape variation in the carapace of Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853) in Yangcheng Lake during the year-long culture period. Eur. Zool. J. 2022, 89, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, H. Comparative Studies on Morphology, Culture Performance and Biochemical Composition Among Yangtze, Huang, and Liao River Populations of Adult Eriocheir sinensis; Shanghai Ocean University: Shanghai, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  32. GB/T 19957-2005; AQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China). Product of Geographical Indication—Yangcheng Lake Chinese Mitten Crab. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2005. (In Chinese)
  33. Feng, W.; Feng, W.; Ge, J.; Li, J.; Su, S.; Jia, R.; Yu, J.; Xu, P.; Tang, Y. Alterations of amino acid metabolism and intestinal microbiota in Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) fed on formulated diet and iced trash fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2021, 40, 100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Food and Agricultural Organization. Dietary Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition. Report of an FAO Expert Consultation; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  35. Millward, D.J. Amino acid scoring patterns for protein quality assessment. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, S31–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Seligson, F.H.; Mackey, L.N. Variable predictions of protein quality by chemical score due to amino acid analysis and reference pattern. J. Nutr. 1984, 114, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, Y.; Gu, S.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L.; Zheng, J. Comparison of fatty acid and amino acid profiles of steamed Chinese mitten crab. Fish. Sci. 2014, 80, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Luo, X.; Xu, Z.; Pan, J.; Zou, G.; Liang, H. Comparison of Body Characteristics, Carotenoid Composition, and Nutritional Quality of Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) with Different Hepatopancreas Redness. Foods 2024, 13, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Xu, J.; Ren, M.; Li, S. Morphological identification of population of Eriocheir sinensis from Changjiang, Liaohe, and Oujiang rivers. J. Fish. China 1997, 21, 269–274. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jiang, X.; Wu, X.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, Y. Can morphological characters be used to identify the pond-reared offspring of wild Chinese mitten crabs, Eriocheir sinensis, from different basins? Crustaceana 2019, 92, 957–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiang, X.; Wu, X.; He, J.; Deng, D.; Xiang, C.; Cheng, Y. Effects of selective breeding on the morphological characteristics of wild and cultured juvenile Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). J. Fish. China 2018, 42, 1285–1298. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen, J.; Ma, X.; Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Tao, C. The study of relationships between growth, molt and accumulated temperature of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). J. Shanghai Ocean. Univ. 2016, 25, 675–683. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yi, P.; Fan, C.; Jiang, X.; Wu, X. Morphological differences of adult Chinese mitten crabs Eriocheir sinensis from different selected strains. Fish. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2023, 50, 218–223. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ikpe, E.; Ubong, U.; Archibong, U. Proximate analysis, heavy metals and total hydrocarbon content of Callinectes sapidus obtained from Ibaka River, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Res. J. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 32–43. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, S.; Luo, L.; Zhang, R.; Guo, K.; Zhao, Z. The Biochemical Composition and Quality of Adult Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis Reared in Carbonate-Alkalinity Water. Foods 2024, 13, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nasef, A.M. Effect of Variation in Aquatic Environment Type on Biochemical Composition and Protein Quality in Some Fishes. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. B Zool. 2021, 13, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiang, H.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hu, S.; Wang, Q. Chasing relationships between nutrition and reproduction: A comparative transcriptome analysis of hepatopancreas and testis from Eriocheir sinensis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part. D Genom. Proteom. 2009, 4, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Boucard, C.G.V.; Patrois, J.; Ceccaldi, H.J. Exhaustion of lipid reserves in the hepatopancreas of Fenneropenaeus indicus broodstock in relation to successive spawnings. Aquaculture 2004, 236, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Z.; Wu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Zeng, C.; Yang, X. Ovarian re-maturation following the first spawning in the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis (H. Milne-Edwards). Aquac. Res. 2011, 42, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gallo, A.; Costantini, M. Glycobiology of reproductive processes in marine animals: The state of the art. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 2861–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, B.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, D.; Wang, N.; Liu, H.; Wan, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Guo, Z. Comparative study on growth, digestive function and intestinal microbial composition of female Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis selected at different growth stages in rice-crab culture systems. Aquaculture 2022, 554, 738120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, J.; Tai, X.; Shao, N.; Sun, Y.; Nie, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Xu, P.; Xu, G. Effects of effective microorganisms on the growth performance, nutritional composition and flavour quality of the pond-cultured Eriocheir sinensis. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, J.Q.; Wu, X.G.; Zhang, P.C.; He, J.; Fan, Y.W.; Liu, M.M.; Cheng, Y.X. Growth, gonadal development and secondary sexual characteristics of pond-reared male Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) during the second year culture. Chin. J. Zool. 2016, 51, 434–448. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shao, L.; Wang, C.; He, J.; Wu, X.; Cheng, Y. Meat quality of Chinese mitten crabs fattened with natural and formulated diets. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2014, 23, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Sun, B.; Xiong, L.; Cheng, Y. Composition and nutritional qualities of edible tissues of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) from Ya Lake over different months. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 105, 104199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xing, S.; Liang, X.; Zhang, X.; Oliva Teles, A.; Peres, H.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; Mai, K.; Kaushik, S.J.; Xue, M. Essential amino acid requirements of fish and crustaceans, a meta-analysis. Rev. Aquac. 2024, 16, 1069–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. World Health Organization; United Nations University. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  58. Brestenský, M.; Nitrayová, S.; Patráš, P.; Nitray, J. Dietary requirements for proteins and amino acids in human nutrition. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 15, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, G.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, W.; Chen, W.; Levy, T.; Wu, X. Stocking density affects culture performance and economic profit of adult all-female Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) reared in earthen ponds. Aquaculture 2024, 581, 740352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zeng, Q.; Xu, Y.; Jeppesen, E.; Gu, X.; Mao, Z.; Chen, H. Farming practices affect the amino acid profiles of the aquaculture Chinese mitten crab. Peerj 2021, 9, e11605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tian, C.; Wang, M.; Li, J.; Song, C.; Ge, J.; Su, S.; Tang, Y. Studies on amino acid composition, nutritional scores and speciesidentification of muscle tissues of Eriocheir sinensis from six differentgeographical lakes. Freshw. Fish. 2021, 51, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao, L.; Long, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Xu, L.; Liu, Q.; Luo, J.; Du, Z.; Yang, S. Effects of paddyfield and pond culture on intestinal microbiota, immunecapacity and muscle free amino acids of Eriocheir sinensis. J. Shanghai Ocean Univ. 2022, 31, 1404–1412. [Google Scholar]
  63. Han, W.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Cheng, Y. Effect of different feeding modes on the growth, biochemical composition, and living environment of the juvenile Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Aquaculture 2021, 541, 736687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Long, X.; Guo, Q.; Wang, X.; Francis, D.S.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, X. Effects of fattening period on ovarian development and nutritional quality of adult female Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Aquaculture 2020, 519, 734748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ye, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.; Chen, J.; Zhang, C. Uncovering the nutritive profiles of adult male chinese mitten crab (E. sinensis) harvested from the pond and natural water area of Qin lake based on metabolomics. Foods 2023, 12, 2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xie, Q.; Liu, Y. Study on the nutritional quality of ecologically bred Chinese mitten crabs with different body weights. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 2948–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. De Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Caramujo, M.J. The Various Roles of Fatty Acids. Molecules 2018, 23, 2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, J.; Sun, B.; Zhang, D. Association of Dietary n3 and n6 Fatty Acids Intake with Hypertension: NHANES 2007–2014. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Echeverría, F.; Ortiz, M.; Valenzuela, R.; Videla, L.A. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids regulation of PPARs, signaling: Relationship to tissue development and aging. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2016, 114, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. D’Angelo, S.; Motti, M.L.; Meccariello, R. ω-3 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, obesity and cancer. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. FAO; WHO. Fats and Fatty Acids in Human Nutrition. Report of an Expert Consultation; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2008; Volume 10, p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  72. Barrento, S.; Marques, A.; Teixeira, B.; Mendes, R.; Bandarra, N.; Vaz-Pires, P.; Nunes, M.L. Chemical composition, cholesterol, fatty acid and amino acid in two populations of brown crab Cancer pagurus: Ecological and human health implications. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yu, J.Y.; Yan, P.S. Fatty acid composition evaluation of edible parts of Eriocheir sinensis in intensive ponds of Gucheng waters. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 5334–5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Latyshev, N.A.; Kasyanov, S.P.; Kharlamenko, V.I.; Svetashev, V.I. Lipids and of fatty acids of edible crabs of the north-western Pacific. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, M.; Park, J.C.; Lee, J. Effects of environmental stressors on lipid metabolism in aquatic invertebrates. Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 200, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, M.; Su, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, J.; Feng, W.; Chen, H.; Jiang, J.; Lu, Z.; Liu, W.; Gan, J. The Role of Biogeography in Shaping Intestinal Flora and Influence on Fatty Acid Composition in Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Microb. Ecol. 2023, 86, 3111–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, N.; Wang, X.C. Comparison of gender differences in nutritional value and key odor profile of hepatopancreas of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chen, B.; Zheng, J.; Chen, C.; Wu, K.; Lin, F.; Ning, L.; Rong, H.; Chen, C.; Xiao, F.; Zhang, H. Differences in lipid accumulation and mobilization in the hepatopancreas and ovary of female mud crab (Scylla paramamosain, Estampador, 1949) during ovarian development. Aquaculture 2023, 564, 739046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wen, X.; Chen, L.; Ai, C.; Zhou, Z.; Jiang, H. Variation in lipid composition of Chinese mitten-handed crab, Eriocheir sinensis during ovarian maturation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2001, 130, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ying, X.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y. Comparative studies on fatty acid composition of the ovaries and hepatopancreas at different physiological stages of the Chinese mitten crab. Aquaculture 2006, 256, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jia, L. Comparison of Environmental Factors and Muscle Quality in Rice-Shrimp Integrated Culture System in Different Areas and Establishment of Geographica Origin Traceability System; Shanghai Ocean University: Shanghai, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Distance measures applied to the back of carapace (A) and ambulatory legs of Eriocher sinensis (B). Definition of each measurement parameter: C1: C (C′), width of carapace; C2: DF, length of carapace; C3: A (A′), width of frontal; C4: B (B′), width of the first anterolateral tooth; C5: EF, length of the posterior half of carapace. L1: the longest dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg; L2: the frontier dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg; L3: the dactylus length of the last ambulatory leg.
Figure 1. Distance measures applied to the back of carapace (A) and ambulatory legs of Eriocher sinensis (B). Definition of each measurement parameter: C1: C (C′), width of carapace; C2: DF, length of carapace; C3: A (A′), width of frontal; C4: B (B′), width of the first anterolateral tooth; C5: EF, length of the posterior half of carapace. L1: the longest dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg; L2: the frontier dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg; L3: the dactylus length of the last ambulatory leg.
Animals 15 00243 g001
Figure 2. PCA analysis of male (A) and female (B) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on morphological proportion traits; YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Figure 2. PCA analysis of male (A) and female (B) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on morphological proportion traits; YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Animals 15 00243 g002
Figure 3. PCA analysis of male (A,C,E) and female (B,D,F) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on proximate composition of muscle (A,B), hepatopancreas (C,D), and gonad (E,F) tissues. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Figure 3. PCA analysis of male (A,C,E) and female (B,D,F) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on proximate composition of muscle (A,B), hepatopancreas (C,D), and gonad (E,F) tissues. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Animals 15 00243 g003
Figure 4. PCA analysis of male (A,C,E) and female (B,D,F) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on amino acids contents of muscle (A,B), hepatopancreas (C,D), and gonad (E,F) tissues. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Figure 4. PCA analysis of male (A,C,E) and female (B,D,F) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on amino acids contents of muscle (A,B), hepatopancreas (C,D), and gonad (E,F) tissues. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Animals 15 00243 g004
Figure 5. PCA analysis of male (A,C,E) and female (B,D,F) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on fatty acids contents of muscle (A,B), hepatopancreas (C,D), and gonad (E,F) tissues. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Figure 5. PCA analysis of male (A,C,E) and female (B,D,F) Eriocheir sinensis from six regions based on fatty acids contents of muscle (A,B), hepatopancreas (C,D), and gonad (E,F) tissues. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Animals 15 00243 g005
Table 1. The sample information of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six groups.
Table 1. The sample information of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six groups.
Sampling Sites SexSizeBody Weight (g)Carapace Length (mm)
Yongyan Anhui (YY)Male15120.85 ± 5.9856.99 ± 0.84
Female15112.27 ± 4.0657.52 ± 0.64
Panjin Liaoning (PJ)Male1586.20 ± 1.8250.75 ± 0.23
Female1557.90 ± 2.0845.86 ± 0.50
Huzhou Zhejiang (HZ)Male15150.97 ± 1.7261.22 ± 0.29
Female15146.42 ± 2.3763.50 ± 0.35
Jinxian Jiangxi (JX)Male15246.04 ± 4.4670.93 ± 0.27
Female15166.29 ± 1.9765.61 ± 0.37
Changzhou Jiangsu (CZ)Male15212.97 ± 3.8467.07 ± 0.49
Female15140.24 ± 1.2461.53 ± 0.24
Ezhou Hubei (EZ)Male15174.12 ± 2.6562.38 ± 0.28
Female15122.89 ± 2.0359.06 ± 0.33
Table 2. The morphological parameters of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six regions.
Table 2. The morphological parameters of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six regions.
HZPJEZYYJXCZ
Male
T/C10.5394 ± 0.0051 c0.5442 ± 0.0052 bc0.5446 ± 0.0043 bc0.5426 ± 0.002 c0.5551 ± 0.0051 b0.5686 ± 0.0037 a
C2/C11.1345 ± 0.02051.1221 ± 0.00411.1319 ± 0.00581.1337 ± 0.00351.1381 ± 0.00551.1270 ± 0.0039
C3/C10.2416 ± 0.0023 bc0.2442 ± 0.0025 c0.2458 ± 0.0034 c0.2426 ± 0.0035 c0.2344 ± 0.0021 a0.2328 ± 0.0018 a
C4/C10.6347 ± 0.0029 a0.6237 ± 0.0033 ab0.6140 ± 0.0044 bc0.6097 ± 0.0039 c0.6166 ± 0.0048 bc0.6215 ± 0.0047 b
C5/C10.5416 ± 0.0031 ab0.5370 ± 0.0023 b0.5405 ± 0.0023 ab0.5464 ± 0.0021 a0.5381 ± 0.0025 b0.5443 ± 0.0026 ab
L1/C10.7909 ± 0.0084 a0.7973 ± 0.0043 a0.7685 ± 0.0072 b0.7893 ± 0.0073 a0.7708 ± 0.0060 b0.8022 ± 0.0061 a
L2/C10.5544 ± 0.0078 ab0.5560 ± 0.0033 ab0.5706 ± 0.0336 a0.5519 ± 0.0057 ab0.5281 ± 0.0049 b0.5504 ± 0.0049 ab
L3/C10.4623 ± 0.0072 b0.5183 ± 0.0044 a0.4462 ± 0.0049 bc0.4424 ± 0.0067 c0.4457 ± 0.0064 bc0.4564 ± 0.0070 bc
Female
T/C10.5714 ± 0.0054 ab0.5764 ± 0.0082 ab0.5678 ± 0.0036 b0.5707 ± 0.0065 ab0.5868 ± 0.0039 a0.5828 ± 0.0057 ab
C2/C11.1120 ± 0.02021.1105 ± 0.00371.1236 ± 0.00191.0503 ± 0.07111.1236 ± 0.00221.1261 ± 0.0041
C3/C10.2394 ± 0.0025 ab0.2467 ± 0.0033 a0.2347 ± 0.0027 bc0.2336 ± 0.0023 bc0.2377 ± 0.0033 b0.2301 ± 0.0017 c
C4/C10.6071 ± 0.0133 b0.6382 ± 0.0040 a0.6028 ± 0.0039 b0.6053 ± 0.0042 b0.6062 ± 0.0034 b0.6171 ± 0.0031 b
C5/C10.5343 ± 0.0028 bc0.5272 ± 0.0025 d0.5293 ± 0.0024 cd0.5426 ± 0.0022 a0.5369 ± 0.0020 ab0.5314 ± 0.0023 bcd
L1/C10.7148 ± 0.0090 b0.7240 ± 0.0086 b0.7161 ± 0.0053 b0.7278 ± 0.0040 ab0.7141 ± 0.0060 b0.7473 ± 0.0096 a
L2/C10.5117 ± 0.00790.5173 ± 0.00600.5056 ± 0.00510.5199 ± 0.00410.5092 ± 0.00550.5196 ± 0.0076
L3/C10.4194 ± 0.0087 b0.4854 ± 0.0088 a0.4248 ± 0.0063 b0.4251 ± 0.0043 b0.4293 ± 0.0115 b0.4259 ± 0.0051 b
Note: T: body thickness, C1: length of carapace, C2: width of carapace, C3: width of frontal, C4: width of the first anterolateral tooth, C5: length of the posterior half of carapace, L1: the longest dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg, L2: the frontier dactylus length of the third ambulatory leg, L3: the dactylus length of the last ambulatory leg. The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Proximate composition in the muscles, hepatopancreases, and gonads of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (%, wet weight).
Table 3. Proximate composition in the muscles, hepatopancreases, and gonads of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (%, wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
Muscle
Moisture78.90 ± 0.26 a78.47 ± 0.48 a73.60 ± 0.71 d76.13 ± 0.34 b75.83 ± 0.84 bd78.23 ± 0.20 ab78.03 ± 0.12 a76.7 ± 0.76 ab74.10 ± 1.21 b77.07 ± 1.38 a75.5 ± 0.21 ab77.83 ± 0.54 a
Ash1.73 ± 0.09 bc2.20 ± 0.06 a1.97 ± 0.09 ab1.63 ± 0.07 c1.67 ± 0.09 bc1.40 ± 0.06 c1.67 ± 0.09 b2.03 ± 0.03 a1.70 ± 0.06 b1.63 ± 0.15 b1.70 ± 0.06 b1.63 ± 0.09 b
Crude lipid0.83 ± 0.09 b0.90 ± 0.10 b1.07 ± 0.12 ab0.97 ± 0.03 b1.20 ± 0.21 a1.37 ± 0.12 a0.80 ± 0.06 c0.77 ± 0.09 cd0.90 ± 0.06 bc1.03 ± 0.09 b0.67 ± 0.03 d1.50 ± 0.06 a
Crude protein16.80 ± 0.46 c16.80 ± 0.23 c21.23 ± 0.79 a19.60 ± 0.21 b18.93 ± 0.37 b17.20 ± 0.10 c18.00 ± 0.25 b17.93 ± 0.64 b18.07 ± 0.84 b17.33 ± 0.23 b21.10 ± 0.20 a17.10 ± 0.36 b
Sugar0.70 ± 0.10 c1.07 ± 0.07 b1.53 ± 0.12 a0.70 ± 0.10 c1.60 ± 0.15 a1.10 ± 0.06 b0.47 ± 0.03 e1.33 ± 0.03 b2.27 ± 0.09 a1.03 ± 0.09 c0.67 ± 0.03 d1.27 ± 0.03 b
Hepatopancreas
Moisture55.83 ± 1.43 b64.97 ± 2.53 a44.53 ± 0.87 c45.77 ± 1.49 c46.10 ± 2.17 c55.00 ± 3.10 b54.23 ± 4.69 a58.23 ± 3.67 a43.27 ± 0.49 b43.67 ± 1.79 b35.07 ± 2.78 b39.47 ± 2.14 b
Ash1.37 ± 0.151.50 ± 0.061.47 ± 0.091.43 ± 0.091.27 ± 0.091.30 ± 0.121.30 ± 0.121.33 ± 0.071.10 ± 0.061.37 ± 0.031.10 ± 0.151.10 ± 0.06
Crude lipid29.27 ± 1.58 bc21.73 ± 2.67 c41.53 ± 1.59 a37.73 ± 3.62 ab40.9 ± 2.01 a32.97 ± 3.03 b29.53 ± 5.48 c27.80 ± 3.27 c37.93 ± 3.58 bc42.90 ± 2.52 ab53.20 ± 3.58 a48.47 ± 2.34 ab
Crude protein9.45 ± 0.23 ab10.09 ± 0.37 a8.08 ± 0.03 c9.56 ± 0.21 ab9.71 ± 0.25 ab8.97 ± 0.25 b11.47 ± 0.43 a10.63 ± 0.61 ab9.09 ± 0.04 b8.92 ± 0.21 b9.24 ± 1.14 b9.63 ± 0.24 b
Sugar0.83 ± 0.03 c1.20 ± 0.21 c2.33 ± 0.03 a1.77 ± 0.07 b1.23 ± 0.03 c0.87 ± 0.07 c1.50 ± 0.10 b1.50 ± 0.06 b2.40 ± 0.15 a1.23 ± 0.15 b0.73 ± 0.03 c0.60 ± 0.06 c
Gonad
Moisture73.43 ± 0.55 a71.03 ± 0.55 b70.8 ± 0.80 b71.87 ± 0.73 ab73.47 ± 0.20 a73.30 ± 0.25 a52.77 ± 0.52 a52.97 ± 1.57 a48.70 ± 0.98 b50.13 ± 0.62 b44.37 ± 0.29 d51.53 ± 0.12 ab
Ash2.40 ± 0.10 a2.10 ± 0.06 ab1.90 ± 0.12 b2.13 ± 0.12 ab2.33 ± 0.15 a2.27 ± 0.15 a2.17 ± 0.12 cd2.40 ± 0.12 bc1.83 ± 0.34 cd2.80 ± 0.25 ab3.20 ± 0.17 a1.57 ± 0.09 d
Crude lipid0.80 ± 0.06 c1.10 ± 0.15 bc2.17 ± 0.20 a1.23 ± 0.07 b0.93 ± 0.19 bc0.83 ± 0.09 bc14.23 ± 0.62 b15.33 ± 0.77 ab16.8 ± 0.53 a14.60 ± 0.26 b16.30 ± 0.47 a15.60 ± 0.10 ab
Crude protein16.53 ± 0.15 d21.03 ± 1.12 a17.30 ± 0.65 cd21.17 ± 0.09 a18.47 ± 0.22 bc19.13 ± 0.13 b26.23 ± 0.72 b25.67 ± 2.44 b30.23 ± 0.72 a28.67 ± 0.33 ab31.33 ± 0.27 a29.70 ± 0.17 a
Sugar4.70 ± 0.10 a3.37 ± 0.13 c4.03 ± 0.15 b3.03 ± 0.09 c3.93 ± 0.03 b3.93 ± 0.13 b3.10 ± 0.12 a3.10 ± 0.10 a2.20 ± 0.35 b2.83 ± 0.19 a3.37 ± 0.03 a1.87 ± 0.03 c
Note: Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province.
Table 4. The amino acid composition in muscle of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (g/100 g, wet weight).
Table 4. The amino acid composition in muscle of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (g/100 g, wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
Aspartic acid1.406 ± 0.054 b1.099 ± 0.005 b1.582 ± 0.021 a1.618 ± 0.033 a1.435 ± 0.018 b1.189 ± 0.079 c1.218 ± 0.010 c1.417 ± 0.011 b1.542 ± 0.009 a1.392 ± 0.015 b1.432 ± 0.049 b1.368 ± 0.021 b
Threonine *0.668 ± 0.025 b0.506 ± 0.001 c0.760 ± 0.009 a0.750 ± 0.016 a0.687 ± 0.010 b0.558 ± 0.036 c0.596 ± 0.004 c0.677 ± 0.006 ab0.708 ± 0.004 a0.636 ± 0.007 c0.713 ± 0.032 a0.658 ± 0.014 b
Serine0.557 ± 0.021 c0.453 ± 0.002 d0.647 ± 0.008 ab0.676 ± 0.016 a0.616 ± 0.008 b0.454 ± 0.030 d0.468 ± 0.003 d0.590 ± 0.005 c0.641 ± 0.007 a0.553 ± 0.006 c0.606 ± 0.023 ab0.570 ± 0.027 b
Glutamic acid2.135 ± 0.080 b1.763 ± 0.009 c2.422 ± 0.029 a2.389 ± 0.049 a2.262 ± 0.046 ab1.790 ± 0.116 c1.805 ± 0.018 d2.286 ± 0.017 ab2.391 ± 0.016 a2.029 ± 0.022 c2.165 ± 0.082 bc2.099 ± 0.041 c
Glycine1.022 ± 0.039 b0.967 ± 0.006 b0.981 ± 0.011 b1.170 ± 0.024 a1.097 ± 0.016 ab0.866 ± 0.062 c0.864 ± 0.006 d1.060 ± 0.010 b0.904 ± 0.009 cd0.942 ± 0.010 c1.136 ± 0.042 a0.946 ± 0.015 c
Alanine1.242 ± 0.048 b1.047 ± 0.007 c1.350 ± 0.018 ab1.433 ± 0.025 a1.272 ± 0.026 b1.121 ± 0.034 c1.145 ± 0.008 c1.330 ± 0.011 ab1.311 ± 0.010 ab1.197 ± 0.009 bc1.332 ± 0.063 a1.237 ± 0.036 b
Cysteine0.103 ± 0.004 ab0.044 ± 0.003 d0.084 ± 0.003 bc0.067 ± 0.004 c0.072 ± 0.018 c0.114 ± 0.007 a0.069 ± 0.001 b0.085 ± 0.002 ab0.109 ± 0.003 a0.064 ± 0.005 b0.094 ± 0.020 ab0.098 ± 0.008 a
Valine *0.703 ± 0.027 a0.538 ± 0.004 b0.739 ± 0.010 a0.745 ± 0.013 a0.707 ± 0.012 a0.604 ± 0.043 b0.611 ± 0.003 b0.699 ± 0.005 b0.731 ± 0.006 a0.639 ± 0.006 c0.716 ± 0.022 a0.681 ± 0.009 b
Methionine *0.295 ± 0.015 b0.154 ± 0.002 e0.267 ± 0.005 bc0.229 ± 0.006 d0.258 ± 0.011 cd0.336 ± 0.014 a0.214 ± 0.001 cd0.325 ± 0.004 ab0.246 ± 0.005 bc0.155 ± 0.009 d0.339 ± 0.042 a0.275 ± 0.020 b
Isoleucine *0.640 ± 0.028 b0.501 ± 0.003 c0.706 ± 0.013 a0.637 ± 0.013 b0.644 ± 0.011 b0.543 ± 0.036 c0.560 ± 0.005 c0.660 ± 0.009 ab0.687 ± 0.007 a0.528 ± 0.003 c0.649 ± 0.021 b0.633 ± 0.012 b
Leucine *1.131 ± 0.047 b0.910 ± 0.006 c1.254 ± 0.019 a1.216 ± 0.023 a1.146 ± 0.018 ab0.948 ± 0.063 c0.987 ± 0.006 c1.181 ± 0.009 a1.210 ± 0.015 a1.020 ± 0.008 c1.160 ± 0.045 ab1.110 ± 0.016 b
Tyrosine0.575 ± 0.023 b0.408 ± 0.006 d0.624 ± 0.008 a0.636 ± 0.010 a0.556 ± 0.008 bc0.529 ± 0.008 c0.503 ± 0.003 c0.565 ± 0.008 ab0.616 ± 0.011 a0.537 ± 0.007 b0.616 ± 0.026 a0.566 ± 0.028 ab
Phenylalanine *0.626 ± 0.026 b0.477 ± 0.002 d0.694 ± 0.012 a0.650 ± 0.014 ab0.634 ± 0.008 b0.534 ± 0.030 c0.543 ± 0.003 c0.639 ± 0.008 ab0.661 ± 0.013 a0.542 ± 0.008 c0.649 ± 0.019 ab0.614 ± 0.013 b
Lysine *1.195 ± 0.047 a0.953 ± 0.007 b1.264 ± 0.017 a1.300 ± 0.022 a1.214 ± 0.025 a1.013 ± 0.061 b1.039 ± 0.008 c1.241 ± 0.009 ab1.265 ± 0.010 a1.128 ± 0.006 c1.231 ± 0.044 ab1.183 ± 0.021 bc
Histidine &0.322 ± 0.026 a0.230 ± 0.009 b0.317 ± 0.003 a0.313 ± 0.011 ab0.326 ± 0.009 a0.268 ± 0.018 b0.270 ± 0.002 c0.311 ± 0.007 b0.369 ± 0.028 a0.270 ± 0.006 c0.335 ± 0.013 ab0.325 ± 0.005 b
Arginine &1.424 ± 0.061 b1.178 ± 0.010 c1.458 ± 0.016 ab1.561 ± 0.033 a1.420 ± 0.024 b1.234 ± 0.075 c1.222 ± 0.009 d1.437 ± 0.005 b1.541 ± 0.020 a1.354 ± 0.011 c1.357 ± 0.043 c1.346 ± 0.019 c
Proline0.818 ± 0.034 ab0.551 ± 0.003 c0.680 ± 0.025 b0.869 ± 0.016 a0.745 ± 0.0140 b0.675 ± 0.057 b0.666 ± 0.006 c0.767 ± 0.017 b0.659 ± 0.044 c0.697 ± 0.009 c0.847 ± 0.027 a0.763 ± 0.021 b
EAA5.257 ± 0.211 a4.040 ± 0.022 b5.683 ± 0.08 a5.528 ± 0.105 a5.290 ± 0.090 a4.536 ± 0.257 b4.548 ± 0.029 bc4.269 ± 0.031 c6.000 ± 0.083 a5.841 ± 0.115 a5.616 ± 0.089 a4.804 ± 0.275 b
SEAA1.746 ± 0.087 ab1.407 ± 0.017 bc1.775 ± 0.019 a1.874 ± 0.043 a1.746 ± 0.024 ab1.502 ± 0.094 b1.492 ± 0.011 d1.749 ± 0.011 b1.911 ± 0.029 a1.624 ± 0.017 c1.692 ± 0.056 bc1.671 ± 0.022 bc
NEAA7.857 ± 0.302 b6.335 ± 0.038 c8.370 ± 0.074 ab8.860 ± 0.175 a8.055 ± 0.116 b6.738 ± 0.365 c6.737 ± 0.044 d8.099 ± 0.074 ab8.171 ± 0.083 a7.411 ± 0.073 c8.226 ± 0.280 a7.647 ± 0.183 bc
TAA14.860 ± 0.600 b11.781 ± 0.076 c15.827 ± 0.171 ab16.261 ± 0.323 a15.091 ± 0.228 ab12.775 ± 0.716 ab12.778 ± 0.084 b11.781 ± 0.076 c15.827 ± 0.171 ab16.261 ± 0.323 a15.091 ± 0.228 b12.775 ± 0.716 c
EAA/TAA0.3750.3620.3790.3590.3720.3760.3560.3620.3790.3590.3720.376
EAA/NEAA0.7100.6740.7170.6590.6970.7130.6750.5270.7340.7880.6850.629
Note: * indicates essential amino acid; & indicates semi-essential amino acid. EAA: total essential amino acids; SEAA: total semi-essential amino acids; NEAA: total non-essential amino acids. The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 5. The amino acid composition in hepatopancreas of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (g/100 g, wet weight).
Table 5. The amino acid composition in hepatopancreas of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (g/100 g, wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
Aspartic acid0.548 ± 0.017 c0.759 ± 0.015 b1.033 ± 0.008 a1.036 ± 0.012 a0.592 ± 0.046 c0.515 ± 0.023 d0.682 ± 0.052 c0.650 ± 0.011 c1.288 ± 0.021 a1.053 ± 0.018 b0.468 ± 0.016 d0.424 ± 0.019 d
Threonine *0.353 ± 0.012 c0.428 ± 0.010 b0.548 ± 0.002 a0.559 ± 0.008 a0.339 ± 0.019 c0.335 ± 0.019 c0.406 ± 0.027 c0.396 ± 0.006 c0.628 ± 0.012 a0.556 ± 0.012 b0.310 ± 0.008 d0.268 ± 0.015 d
Serine0.222 ± 0.006 c0.350 ± 0.011 b0.379 ± 0.001 ab0.392 ± 0.005 a0.261 ± 0.019 c0.212 ± 0.022 d0.300 ± 0.023 c0.301 ± 0.005 c0.487 ± 0.009 a0.431 ± 0.008 b0.222 ± 0.004 d0.173 ± 0.004 e
Glutamic acid0.737 ± 0.025 c0.901 ± 0.008 b1.031 ± 0.003 a0.962 ± 0.016 ab0.757 ± 0.050 c0.666 ± 0.037 d0.863 ± 0.056 c0.791 ± 0.015 d1.177 ± 0.018 a1.022 ± 0.011 b0.577 ± 0.015 e0.526 ± 0.031 e
Glycine0.377 ± 0.016 b0.411 ± 0.008 a0.425 ± 0.002 a0.450 ± 0.005 a0.350 ± 0.022 b0.369 ± 0.020 b0.430 ± 0.023 ab0.410 ± 0.004 b0.458 ± 0.008 a0.453 ± 0.012 a0.326 ± 0.006 c0.305 ± 0.019 c
Alanine0.516 ± 0.025 d0.497 ± 0.006 d0.685 ± 0.005 b0.761 ± 0.007 a0.415 ± 0.022 e0.579 ± 0.035 c0.512 ± 0.02 cd0.539 ± 0.007 c0.735 ± 0.012 a0.643 ± 0.014 b0.450 ± 0.010 d0.444 ± 0.050 d
Cysteine0.058 ± 0.005 bc0.085 ± 0.002 a0.052 ± 0.001 c0.058 ± 0.002 b0.066 ± 0.004 b0.064 ± 0.006 b0.066 ± 0.005 a0.044 ± 0.002 b0.061 ± 0.003 a0.064 ± 0.002 a0.048 ± 0.003 b0.045 ± 0.002 b
Valine *0.375 ± 0.010 b0.427 ± 0.008 a0.433 ± 0.003 a0.461 ± 0.006 a0.367 ± 0.023 b0.383 ± 0.021 b0.420 ± 0.022 c0.407 ± 0.004 c0.521 ± 0.011 a0.466 ± 0.010 b0.320 ± 0.012 d0.301 ± 0.014 d
Methionine *0.153 ± 0.009 b0.239 ± 0.011 a0.175 ± 0.007 b0.173 ± 0.004 b0.189 ± 0.008 b0.178 ± 0.014 b0.162 ± 0.010 ab0.170 ± 0.020 ab0.150 ± 0.009 b0.212 ± 0.008 a0.157 ± 0.002 b0.152 ± 0.010 b
Isoleucine *0.293 ± 0.009 b0.330 ± 0.003 a0.276 ± 0.002 b0.290 ± 0.001 b0.280 ± 0.020 b0.296 ± 0.016 ab0.337 ± 0.022 a0.328 ± 0.003 a0.341 ± 0.007 a0.291 ± 0.009 b0.241 ± 0.008 c0.23 ± 0.0120 c
Leucine *0.519 ± 0.018 b0.588 ± 0.010 a0.505 ± 0.003 b0.532 ± 0.004 b0.509 ± 0.026 b0.534 ± 0.028 ab0.585 ± 0.034 a0.569 ± 0.008 ab0.588 ± 0.013 a0.529 ± 0.015 b0.443 ± 0.013 c0.419 ± 0.021 c
Tyrosine0.267 ± 0.014 a0.287 ± 0.004 a0.240 ± 0.003 b0.259 ± 0.001 ab0.259 ± 0.009 ab0.268 ± 0.024 ab0.254 ± 0.013 b0.263 ± 0.004 b0.304 ± 0.010 a0.254 ± 0.010 b0.173 ± 0.007 c0.157 ± 0.010 c
Phenylalanine*0.327 ± 0.017 a0.336 ± 0.004 a0.224 ± 0.003 b0.246 ± 0.003 b0.317 ± 0.022 a0.332 ± 0.023 a0.364 ± 0.023 a0.344 ± 0.004 a0.278 ± 0.014 b0.236 ± 0.014 b0.265 ± 0.009 b0.255 ± 0.007 b
Lysine *0.493 ± 0.016 a0.490 ± 0.005 a0.455 ± 0.002 ab0.457 ± 0.005 ab0.437 ± 0.028 b0.476 ± 0.028 ab0.552 ± 0.033 a0.505 ± 0.008 ab0.530 ± 0.011 a0.456 ± 0.011 bc0.411 ± 0.009 c0.373 ± 0.026 c
Histidine &0.167 ± 0.009 c0.213 ± 0.019 a0.208 ± 0.004 ab0.227 ± 0.004 a0.188 ± 0.010 bc0.172 ± 0.006 c0.188 ± 0.010 bc0.169 ± 0.003 c0.253 ± 0.008 a0.207 ± 0.010 b0.165 ± 0.005 c0.138 ± 0.004 d
Arginine &0.398 ± 0.007 c0.526 ± 0.021 a0.487 ± 0.004 ab0.491 ± 0.006 ab0.397 ± 0.014 c0.450 ± 0.039 c0.478 ± 0.027 b0.574 ± 0.006 a0.598 ± 0.013 a0.558 ± 0.014 a0.354 ± 0.010 c0.360 ± 0.034 c
Proline0.319 ± 0.019 c0.403 ± 0.014 b0.486 ± 0.006 a0.430 ± 0.013 b0.356 ± 0.005 c0.324 ± 0.015 c0.383 ± 0.033 ab0.375 ± 0.011 b0.433 ± 0.010 a0.375 ± 0.019 b0.337 ± 0.011 b0.234 ± 0.007 c
EAA2.512 ± 0.0672.837 ± 0.0262.615 ± 0.0172.718 ± 0.0282.437 ± 0.1372.534 ± 0.1482.826 ± 0.168 a2.719 ± 0.036 a3.037 ± 0.070 a2.747 ± 0.076 a2.146 ± 0.059 b1.998 ± 0.098 b
SEAA0.565 ± 0.016 b0.739 ± 0.039 a0.695 ± 0.008 ab0.718 ± 0.004 a0.585 ± 0.023 b0.622 ± 0.045 ab0.666 ± 0.037 b0.743 ± 0.009 ab0.850 ± 0.018 a0.765 ± 0.024 ab0.519 ± 0.015 c0.498 ± 0.038 c
NEAA3.043 ± 0.124 c3.693 ± 0.054 b4.330 ± 0.025 a4.347 ± 0.054 a3.055 ± 0.161 c2.996 ± 0.179 c3.489 ± 0.223 c3.373 ± 0.047 c4.943 ± 0.089 a4.294 ± 0.089 b2.601 ± 0.056 d2.308 ± 0.127 d
TAA6.120 ± 0.206 b7.269 ± 0.110 a7.640 ± 0.041 a7.783 ± 0.084 a6.077 ± 0.321 b6.152 ± 0.372 b6.981 ± 0.427 b6.835 ± 0.082 b8.830 ± 0.176 a7.806 ± 0.183 ab5.266 ± 0.126 d4.804 ± 0.259 c
EAA/TAA0.4110.3900.3420.3490.4010.4120.4050.3980.3440.3520.4080.416
EAA/NEAA0.8270.7680.6040.6250.7970.8460.8110.8060.6140.6400.8250.867
Note: * indicates essential amino acid; & indicates semi-essential amino acid. EAA: total essential amino acids; SEAA: total semi-essential amino acids; NEAA: total non-essential amino acids, TAA: total amino acids. Note: The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 6. The amino acid composition in testes and ovaries of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (g/100 g, wet weight).
Table 6. The amino acid composition in testes and ovaries of adult Eriocheir sinensis from six different regions (g/100 g, wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
Aspartic acid1.788 ± 0.014 a1.755 ± 0.015 a1.722 ± 0.031 ab1.812 ± 0.042 a1.723 ± 0.080 a1.618 ± 0.022 b2.051 ± 0.052 b2.184 ± 0.021 ab2.156 ± 0.037 ab2.174 ± 0.038 ab2.230 ± 0.063 a2.170 ± 0.079 ab
Threonine *1.372 ± 0.005 a1.257 ± 0.023 b1.160 ± 0.028 c1.228 ± 0.032 bc1.318 ± 0.055 ab1.213 ± 0.016 bc1.321 ± 0.033 a1.365 ± 0.013 ab1.330 ± 0.022 ab1.367 ± 0.025 ab1.466 ± 0.041 a1.418 ± 0.051 ab
Serine0.708 ± 0.005 ab0.696 ± 0.015 ab0.638 ± 0.019 c0.694 ± 0.005 c0.743 ± 0.025 a0.628 ± 0.010 c1.354 ± 0.036 c1.484 ± 0.014 ab1.425 ± 0.023 bc1.455 ± 0.027 abc1.557 ± 0.041 a1.449 ± 0.051 bc
Glutamic acid1.949 ± 0.004 b1.967 ± 0.025 b2.024 ± 0.040 ab2.110 ± 0.035 a2.075 ± 0.047 a1.824 ± 0.023 c2.846 ± 0.076 b3.046 ± 0.033 ab2.970 ± 0.049 b2.946 ± 0.050 b3.200 ± 0.094 a2.993 ± 0.113 ab
Glycine0.588 ± 0.008 a0.583 ± 0.010 a0.585 ± 0.006 a0.594 ± 0.006 a0.594 ± 0.020 a0.549 ± 0.006 b1.182 ± 0.028 ab1.190 ± 0.016 ab1.159 ± 0.019 ab1.125 ± 0.019 b1.242 ± 0.035 a1.231 ± 0.047 a
Alanine1.070 ± 0.0171.098 ± 0.0341.036 ± 0.0351.107 ± 0.0181.038 ± 0.0551.015 ± 0.0131.310 ± 0.0331.322 ± 0.0141.336 ± 0.0231.310 ± 0.0241.391 ± 0.0411.370 ± 0.050
Cysteine0.288 ± 0.015 a0.229 ± 0.003 b0.192 ± 0.002 b0.236 ± 0.009 b0.232 ± 0.034 b0.234 ± 0.004 b0.226 ± 0.005 b0.224 ± 0.005 b0.254 ± 0.005 b0.236 ± 0.001 ab0.246 ± 0.007 a0.240 ± 0.010 ab
Valine *0.518 ± 0.001 b0.496 ± 0.013 b0.565 ± 0.005 a0.575 ± 0.019 a0.592 ± 0.027 a0.494 ± 0.007 b1.481 ± 0.035 ab1.496 ± 0.015 ab1.472 ± 0.023 b1.444 ± 0.025 b1.589 ± 0.045 a1.554 ± 0.058 ab
Methionine *0.026 ± 0.016 ab0.028 ± 0.003 b0.040 ± 0.006 a0.019 ± 0.002 b0.048 ± 0.008 a0.012 ± 0.001 b0.585 ± 0.012 b0.441 ± 0.004 c0.564 ± 0.009 c0.407 ± 0.007 c0.601 ± 0.015 b0.743 ± 0.032 a
Isoleucine *0.703 ± 0.007 ab0.650 ± 0.002 b0.617 ± 0.014 b0.730 ± 0.035 a0.680 ± 0.033 ab0.620 ± 0.010 b1.088 ± 0.026 ab1.107 ± 0.013 ab1.098 ± 0.014 b1.034 ± 0.025 b1.133 ± 0.033 a1.127 ± 0.039 a
Leucine *1.018 ± 0.016 ab0.923 ± 0.012 c0.915 ± 0.023 c1.046 ± 0.035 a1.005 ± 0.050 ab0.934 ± 0.012 bc1.886 ± 0.0451.945 ± 0.0201.924 ± 0.0311.878 ± 0.0422.001 ± 0.0561.990 ± 0.072
Tyrosine0.402 ± 0.018 a0.343 ± 0.003 b0.373 ± 0.009 ab0.387 ± 0.015 ab0.382 ± 0.026 ab0.364 ± 0.007 ab1.005 ± 0.0261.025 ± 0.0091.053 ± 0.0111.094 ± 0.0491.046 ± 0.0331.051 ± 0.034
Phenylalanine *0.564 ± 0.018 a0.508 ± 0.004 ab0.504 ± 0.017 ab0.480 ± 0.019 b0.540 ± 0.042 ab0.517 ± 0.012 ab1.133 ± 0.0331.159 ± 0.0101.120 ± 0.0101.200 ± 0.0771.190 ± 0.0361.168 ± 0.039
Lysine *0.678 ± 0.006 cd0.690 ± 0.020 cd0.829 ± 0.015 a0.730 ± 0.026 bc0.760 ± 0.038 b0.653 ± 0.011 d1.585 ± 0.0371.668 ± 0.0211.637 ± 0.0301.617 ± 0.0281.703 ± 0.0511.669 ± 0.061
Histidine &0.339 ± 0.001 b0.327 ± 0.013 b0.327 ± 0.014 b0.333 ± 0.006 b0.400 ± 0.012 a0.312 ± 0.004 b0.518 ± 0.013 b0.544 ± 0.015 ab0.508 ± 0.006 b0.454 ± 0.010 c0.572 ± 0.016 a0.545 ± 0.016 ab
Arginine &0.532 ± 0.007 b0.541 ± 0.013 b0.619 ± 0.021 a0.531 ± 0.014 b0.620 ± 0.025 a0.534 ± 0.009 b1.634 ± 0.035 b1.755 ± 0.013 ab1.646 ± 0.028 b1.653 ± 0.018 b1.804 ± 0.054 a1.743 ± 0.064 ab
Proline2.078 ± 0.035 a1.871 ± 0.009 b1.524 ± 0.065 c1.900 ± 0.021 ab1.960 ± 0.126 ab1.755 ± 0.030 b1.113 ± 0.029 bc1.160 ± 0.038 bc1.095 ± 0.049 c1.233 ± 0.034 b1.309 ± 0.053 a1.184 ± 0.034 bc
EAA4.879 ± 0.048 ab4.551 ± 0.069 cd4.629 ± 0.095 bcd4.808 ± 0.075 abc4.942 ± 0.172 a4.443 ± 0.068 d9.079 ± 0.22 ab9.181 ± 0.093 ab9.145 ± 0.139 ab8.948 ± 0.229 b9.683 ± 0.275 a9.670 ± 0.351 a
SEAA0.872 ± 0.006 c0.868 ± 0.022 c0.947 ± 0.035 b0.863 ± 0.008 c1.019 ± 0.036 a0.846 ± 0.012 c2.152 ± 0.047 bc2.299 ± 0.028 ab2.153 ± 0.034 bc2.107 ± 0.028 c2.376 ± 0.069 a2.288 ± 0.080 ab
NEAA8.872 ± 0.097 a8.542 ± 0.057 ab8.094 ± 0.206 b8.84 ± 0.066 a8.746 ± 0.396 a7.987 ± 0.113 b11.086 ± 0.279 b11.634 ± 0.147 ab11.449 ± 0.216 ab11.572 ± 0.202 b12.222 ± 0.363 a11.688 ± 0.418 ab
TAA14.623 ± 0.149 a13.962 ± 0.136 abc13.669 ± 0.335 bc14.511 ± 0.13114.707 ± 0.564 a13.277 ± 0.193 c22.317 ± 0.546 b23.114 ± 0.268 ab22.747 ± 0.388 ab22.627 ± 0.458 b24.28 ± 0.706 a23.647 ± 0.849 ab
EAA/TAA0.3340.3260.3390.3310.3360.3350.4070.3970.4020.3950.3990.409
EAA/NEAA0.5500.5330.5720.5440.5660.5560.8190.7890.7990.7730.7920.827
Note: * indicates essential amino acid; & indicates semi-essential amino acid. EAA: total essential amino acids; SEAA: total semi-essential amino acids; NEAA: total non-essential amino acids. The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 7. The fatty acid composition in muscles of adult Eriocheir sinensis from different regions (mg/100 g wet weight).
Table 7. The fatty acid composition in muscles of adult Eriocheir sinensis from different regions (mg/100 g wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
C16:095.95 ± 2.3080.94 ± 3.28104.46 ± 6.4486.5 ± 13.3789.89 ± 9.32103.70 ± 12.3693.01 ± 3.9683.07 ± 5.0782.15 ± 1.3297.54 ± 18.9693.52 ± 6.89105.23 ± 1.46
C18:074.4 ± 1.32 ab59.13 ± 4.01 bc82.44 ± 3.58 a56.71 ± 8.01 c68.84 ± 2.9 abc71.83 ± 8.36 abc76.60 ± 3.16 a66.85 ± 1.85 ab74.6 ± 1.52 a57.96 ± 8.00 b66.36 ± 2.24 ab72.57 ± 2.37 a
C20:08.37 ± 0.11 b8.01 ± 0.25 b8.55 ± 0.26 b10.38 ± 1.1 a7.45 ± 0.64 b7.79 ± 0.18 b8.49 ± 0.14 b7.91 ± 0.48 b7.46 ± 0.23 b10.83 ± 0.72 a7.89 ± 0.24 b7.54 ± 0.22 b
C22:07.33 ± 0.04 ab6.75 ± 0.11 b8.01 ± 0.25 ab9.56 ± 1.38 a8.71 ± 0.96 ab8.56 ± 0.94 ab7.95 ± 0.17 b7.51 ± 0.35 b7.38 ± 0.26 b10.23 ± 0.77 a7.49 ± 0.23 b8.19 ± 0.52 b
ΣSFA186.04 ± 3.33 ab154.33 ± 6.25 b203.47 ± 10.52 a163.15 ± 23.69 ab174.89 ± 11.6 ab191.89 ± 21.56 ab186.04 ± 6.55165.34 ± 2.42171.59 ± 2.80176.56 ± 27.81175.27 ± 8.60193.53 ± 3.11
C16:114.01 ± 0.63 b10.89 ± 0.13 b22.67 ± 3.65 ab25.65 ± 3.44 a17.16 ± 4.00 ab18.67 ± 3.05 ab17.51 ± 1.61 b17.08 ± 1.73 b16.63 ± 3.18 b31.06 ± 8.88 a20.99 ± 1.70 ab23.72 ± 0.49 ab
C18:1n9c133.92 ± 4.68 bc107.51 ± 3.38 c174.35 ± 4.94 a125.13 ± 20.73 bc140.68 ± 13.05 abc157.03 ± 17.92 ab146.92 ± 4.27 ab127.29 ± 2.68 b132.17 ± 8.17 ab144.33 ± 31.89 ab132.31 ± 5.19 ab169.78 ± 1.39 a
C20:112.60 ± 0.62 a4.26 ± 0.11 c5.11 ± 0.42 c5.76 ± 1.01 c9.04 ± 1.05 b10.89 ± 1.31 ab10.15 ± 0.40 b4.64 ± 0.22 d5.15 ± 0.45 d5.41 ± 0.76 d14.56 ± 0.30 a7.19 ± 0.48 c
C22:1n912.36 ± 0.74 cd18.33 ± 1.84 ab19.55 ± 0.72 a15.52 ± 0.83 bc11.46 ± 1.41 d15.57 ± 0.71 bc11.91 ± 1.50 ab16.15 ± 2.15 ab9.91 ± 2.17 b17.29 ± 2.58 a11.06 ± 1.04 ab13.20 ± 2.55 ab
ΣMUFA172.89 ± 6.10 bc141.00 ± 1.75 c221.67 ± 3.52 a172.06 ± 25.69 bc178.34 ± 18.23 abc202.15 ± 19.69 ab186.48 ± 6.35165.15 ± 4.62163.86 ± 12.94198.09 ± 40.55178.91 ± 4.85213.89 ± 3.73
C18:2n6c39.02 ± 5.79 d88.61 ± 15.11 ab112.55 ± 5.34 a74.66 ± 13.25 bc56.39 ± 9.50 cd53.77 ± 8.25 cd35.06 ± 2.80 b94.06 ± 15.22 a70.58 ± 2.27 a73.39 ± 11.25 a26.35 ± 3.55 b90.8 ± 6.66 a
C18:3n35.09 ± 0.80 b13.45 ± 3.16 a11.01 ± 2.88 ab8.97 ± 1.13 ab7.10 ± 1.94 b5.99 ± 0.79 b5.27 ± 0.76 d13.26 ± 0.57 ab11.00 ± 0.99 b14.21 ± 0.91 a5.87 ± 0.33 d7.79 ± 0.30 c
C20:27.52 ± 0.61 c13.59 ± 1.06 ab15.49 ± 0.24 a16.77 ± 2.95 a10.62 ± 1.29 bc10.85 ± 1.26 bc9.79 ± 0.70 b13.13 ± 1.68 ab10.99 ± 0.38 ab13.18 ± 2.73 ab5.99 ± 0.78 c14.52 ± 0.56 a
C20:4n617.77 ± 2.70 c38.72 ± 2.89 ab38.86 ± 1.00 ab48.15 ± 6.92 a26.03 ± 6.07 b26.54 ± 2.49 b19.45 ± 2.15 c34.12 ± 5.78 a20.93 ± 2.54 bc31.03 ± 7.15 ab14.48 ± 1.36 c32.16 ± 0.7 ab
C20:5n356.8 ± 10.60 b75.58 ± 6.12 ab85.18 ± 2.38 ab52.14 ± 7.57 b75.47 ± 23.02 ab101.5 ± 13.81 a73.50 ± 8.20 a71.28 ± 3.95 a42.27 ± 3.60 b41.09 ± 5.81 b58.35 ± 7.47 ab83.44 ± 3.46 a
C22:6n375.44 ± 17.21 b51.05 ± 7.14 bc74.92 ± 5.01 bc30.42 ± 4.59 c78.91 ± 25.82 ab121.97 ± 14.16 a92.63 ± 11.72 a44.14 ± 6.52 b50.11 ± 7.01 b26.68 ± 3.41 b44.08 ± 13.23 b93.31 ± 7.11 a
ΣPUFA201.64 ± 35.96 bc281.00 ± 23.58 ab338 ± 16.49 a231.11 ± 36.11 ab254.51 ± 65.29 ab320.63 ± 38.28 ab235.7 ± 24.91 a269.99 ± 31.60 ab205.89 ± 10.24 b199.58 ± 30.35 b165.12 ± 18.12 b322.03 ± 4.05 a
Σn-3 PUFA137.32 ± 27.12 b140.08 ± 11.07 b171.11 ± 10.09 ab91.53 ± 13.11 b161.47 ± 50.06 ab229.46 ± 26.76 a171.4 ± 19.8 a128.68 ± 10.32 ab103.38 ± 9.63 b81.98 ± 9.38 b118.3 ± 13.94 b184.54 ± 10.01 a
Σn-6 PUFA56.79 ± 8.39 c127.33 ± 16.87 a151.4 ± 6.30 a122.82 ± 20.06 ab82.42 ± 14.34 bc80.31 ± 10.62 c51.17 ± 6.58 b128.18 ± 20.42 a91.51 ± 0.46 a104.42 ± 18.31 a40.83 ± 4.73 b122.96 ± 7.36 a
Note: SFA: Saturated fatty acid; MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acid. The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 8. The fatty acid composition in hepatopancreases of adult Eriocheir sinensis from different regions (mg/100 g wet weight).
Table 8. The fatty acid composition in hepatopancreases of adult Eriocheir sinensis from different regions (mg/100 g wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
C12:023.56 ± 2.54 c31.77 ± 14.08 c79.41 ± 5.13 a56.11 ± 1.47 b38.49 ± 2.23 bc29.16 ± 5.91 c22.26 ± 0.52 c69.90 ± 12.26 b110.95 ± 12.64 a60.06 ± 6.06 b46.55 ± 3.57 bc53.01 ± 4.20 b
C13:011.34 ± 0.78 b18.47 ± 7.71 ab28.78 ± 2. 07 a29.03 ± 1.96 a20.19 ± 0.63 ab15.49 ± 3.34 b10.08 ± 0.66 b34.10 ± 5.87 a29.94 ± 3.03 a31.04 ± 4.25 a26.85 ± 2.76 a26.27 ± 5.58 a
C14:0489.17 ± 62.06 bc205.24 ± 31.38 c510.42 ± 75.82 b532.89 ± 63.9 ab816.00 ± 54.53 a602.27 ± 194.98 ab332.39 ± 76.84 bc263.31 ± 30.05 c571.52 ± 8.93 b591.07 ± 12.27 b1569.32 ± 171.52 a540.97 ± 83.38 b
C15:0127.79 ± 14.5 c174.56 ± 25.61 bc202.79 ± 10.56 b301.82 ± 13.36 a209.16 ± 9.14 b150.09 ± 40.93 b119.65 ± 24.74 c186.23 ± 32.68 b220.26 ± 10.59 b301.60 ± 21.03 a320.76 ± 26.56 a207.48 ± 7.75 b
C16:04071.8 ± 628.5 c4706.5 ± 605.1 c9518.7 ± 759.1 a7710.6 ± 955.6 ab6450.8 ± 281.2 bc5381.6 ± 1592.3 bc5263.7 ± 1201.4 c5635.6 ± 747.3 bc8212.2 ± 643.9 a9282.2 ± 373.8 a8256.9 ± 561.9 a7673.3 ± 233.6 ab
C17:0105.95 ± 11.10 c139.48 ± 28.32 b191.88 ± 9.82 ab241.02 ± 15.94 a153.88 ± 10.32 bc135.09 ± 32.46 bc103.6 ± 23.21 c167.45 ± 25.52 bc188.33 ± 15.36 b259.54 ± 29.39 a201.02 ± 11.27 ab163.61 ± 14.56 bc
C18:0621.77 ± 72.56 c824.66 ± 152.2 c1532.31 ± 128.38 a1275.07 ± 93.06 ab947.54 ± 41.94 bc852.47 ± 225.25 c733.35 ± 83.95 c1219.5 ± 214.78 ab1441.05 ± 110.24 ab1590.57 ± 134.6 a1152.79 ± 31.26 b1233.58 ± 64.22 ab
C20:079.26 ± 6.04 d102.75 ± 11.81 bcd162.80 ± 5.70 a133.74 ± 10.5 abc136.05 ± 3.45 ab96.50 ± 23.59 cd64.97 ± 8.55 b145.45 ± 29.70 a150.16 ± 12.10 a161.98 ± 29.92 a168.83 ± 18.31 a127.92 ± 8.02 a
C21:019.70 ± 1.09 c46.03 ± 5.47 b70.35 ± 4.83 a66.47 ± 1.06 a40.93 ± 4.55 b24.74 ± 5.18 c22.95 ± 3.98 c53.08 ± 11.08 ab76.25 ± 12.12 a72.62 ± 10.43 a38.48 ± 2.38 bc43.56 ± 0.54 bc
C22:052.20 ± 4.75 c130.80 ± 32.48 ab154.05 ± 14.89 a98.99 ± 10.15 bc86.90 ± 3.71 bc69.05 ± 13.61 c50.95 ± 7.33 c135.97 ± 22.20 a142.76 ± 11.99 a131.69 ± 29.05 a75.20 ± 2.08 bc108.01 ± 15 ab
C23:026.96 ± 1.72 d87.99 ± 20.32 ab98.29 ± 5.97 a58.68 ± 5.69 bc46.37 ± 3.78 cd34.27 ± 6.706 cd22.93 ± 2.60 c88.84 ± 20.26 a98.67 ± 6.36 a78.31 ± 17.41 ab30.27 ± 1.74 c55.33 ± 6.41 bc
C24:065.27 ± 5.81 c106.19 ± 23.38 bc121.54 ± 3.95 b173.88 ± 8.25 a119.51 ± 11.23 b86.75 ± 26.72 bc48.34 ± 8.60 c141.64 ± 18.4 ab120.49 ± 10.34 ab170.10 ± 31.79 a107.02 ± 6.10 b92.54 ± 15.09 bc
ΣSFA5694.7 ± 796.1 c6574.4 ± 850.1 c12,671.3 ± 952.7 a10,678.3 ± 1153.9 ab9065.8 ± 301.4 abc7477.4 ± 2160.6 bc6795.2 ± 1434.1 c8141.1 ± 1137.6 bc11,362.6 ± 836.7 a12,730.8 ± 683.8 a11,994.1 ± 794.9 a10,325.6 ± 322.9 ab
C14:143.61 ± 13.48 bc22.86 ± 4.99 c68.63 ± 16.21 ab102.20 ± 10.69 a89.36 ± 6.59 a63.51 ± 23.88 abc29.00 ± 0.91 d51.87 ± 12.17 cd83.28 ± 6.59 b100.41 ± 8.09 b163.79 ± 17.31 a70.25 ± 4.94 bc
C16:11268.3 ± 332.8 c1279.8 ± 261.1 c3391.9 ± 723.8 ab4030.9 ± 554.2 a2662.5 ± 142.4 abc1887.2 ± 669.7 bc1671.6 ± 92.4 c1819.1 ± 284.8 c2800.8 ± 292.6 b3919.3 ± 304.5 a3311.7 ± 377.7 ab2781.1 ± 155.5 b
C18:1n9c4115.4 ± 641.1 c6718.9 ± 762.9 c11,908.9 ± 559.6 a10,118.2 ± 1072.2 ab7179.1 ± 330.0 bc6790.9 ± 1978.4 c6845.5 ± 1049.5 c8473.5 ± 1285.9 bc10,285.3 ± 1252.1 ab11,845.4 ± 246.9 a8766.1 ± 441.2 bc11,146.9 ± 398.7 ab
C20:1739.21 ± 57.09 a185.12 ± 30.15 d375.05 ± 75.76 c334.22 ± 20.77 cd573.12 ± 40.35 ab437.58 ± 93.47 bc558.99 ± 125.41 b243.83 ± 48.87 c421.38 ± 27.62 bc345.65 ± 33.88 bc1308.15 ± 174.78 a411.93 ± 31.9 bc
C22:1n9102.56 ± 10.84 b78.37 ± 19.08 bc101.88 ± 21.92 b53.73 ± 3.68 c206.03 ± 10.72 a89.46 ± 14.26 bc101.37 ± 13.74 bc70.76 ± 11.06 c129.79 ± 9.99 ab53.75 ± 7.77 c142.75 ± 12.20 a65.45 ± 7.22 c
C24:1142.40 ± 10.99 a30.14 ± 8.57 b46.97 ± 6.11 b23.94 ± 1.82 b140.49 ± 9.95 a174.47 ± 60.16 a88.70 ± 23.42 b37.62 ± 4.68 c55.02 ± 1.61 bc21.74 ± 3.77 c208.97 ± 9.08 a57.56 ± 15.48 bc
ΣMUFA6411.5 ± 1026.3 c8315.2 ± 1025.6 c15,893.3 ± 480.2 a14,663.1 ± 1646.9 ab10,850.7 ± 444.1 bc9443.1 ± 2726.3 c9295.2 ± 1292.8 c10,696.7 ± 1611.9 bc13,775.6 ± 1578.4 ab16,286.2 ± 337.8 a13,901.4 ± 1016.7 ab14,533.2 ± 344.5 a
C18:2n6c1937.4 ± 237.4 d4704.1 ± 459.1 bc8485.3 ± 644.5 a5946.8 ± 518.6 b4187.8 ± 942.2 bcd3387.6 ± 1181.8 cd1688.9 ± 382.9 c4751.0 ± 1420.1 ab6730.5 ± 514.3 a6200.2 ± 651.6 a2371.8 ± 478.3 bc7093.3 ± 1580.2 a
C18:3n69.15 ± 0.85 c23.25 ± 9.79 bc24.85 ± 2.50 b45.55 ± 3.93 a28.61 ± 2.99 b18.44 ± 3.93 bc7.44 ± 0.39 c29.20 ± 4.06 ab30.15 ± 2.67 ab35.52 ± 3.61 a22.09 ± 3.66 b25.38 ± 4.04 ab
C18:3n3156.17 ± 13.53 c417.40 ± 54.99 bc1053.31 ± 196.72 a750.96 ± 160.4 ab762.58 ± 244.28 ab258.5 ± 81.21 c165.12 ± 35.98 b364.02 ± 92.67 b1518.20 ± 139.99 a1379.48 ± 426.25 a317.03 ± 44.06 b586.90 ± 10.96 b
C20:2176.90 ± 17.30 d320.20 ± 64.21 cd496.44 ± 30.24 b874.20 ± 61.52 a335.27 ± 48.27 c243.13 ± 57.05 cd351.56 ± 47.21 c421.57 ± 36.76 bc545.56 ± 97.66 bc927.92 ± 68.46 a323.09 ± 54.26 c621.13 ± 127.83 b
C20:3n630.91 ± 4.48 c62.42 ± 17.41 b73.80 ± 2.67 b116.81 ± 17.24 a54.92 ± 5.38 bc42.45 ± 5.32 bc43.53 ± 8.99 c63.67 ± 4.68 bc78.66 ± 10.38 b109.40 ± 14.18 a62.68 ± 4.84 bc67.21 ± 7.32 bc
C20:3n368.72 ± 10.22 c95.47 ± 14.67 abc139.79 ± 9.19 a138.46 ± 19.94 a121.78 ± 21.81 ab82.04 ± 16.76 bc120.19 ± 22.16 bc116.07 ± 9.05 bc219.75 ± 26.28 ab261.94 ± 76.63 a103.91 ± 9.92 c147.12 ± 4.26 bc
C20:4n6876.24 ± 72.01 a359.34 ± 75.63 b561.41 ± 36.90 b867.78 ± 64.5 a812.08 ± 56.56 a584.23 ± 111.85 b586.89 ± 118.81 b330.24 ± 75.40 b542.94 ± 46.38 b645.68 ± 99.1 b1753.32 ± 235.49 a507.46 ± 56.07 b
C22:212.50 ± 1.8122.97 ± 10.1921.92 ± 2.0223.76 ± 3.2018.25 ± 1.2414.65 ± 1.3815.66 ± 1.55 b32.72 ± 4.37 a22.80 ± 2.37 b21.67 ± 5.39 b15.49 ± 0.81 b16.77 ± 2.03 b
C20:5n3494.37 ± 68.92 bc220.35 ± 39.34 c595.83 ± 91.71 b446.53 ± 55.94 bc992.87 ± 51.59 a781.91 ± 253.44 ab358.56 ± 62.34 b192.95 ± 54.65 b501.49 ± 25.85 b364.30 ± 21.92 b1520.38 ± 232.94 a553.87 ± 166.78 b
C22:6n32817.9 ± 415.9 a203.5 ± 52.3 b872.5 ± 237.6 b255.8 ± 25.9 b2930.9 ± 382.2 a2715.9 ± 902.1 a1741.25 ± 458.7 b157.5 ± 32.9 c665.29 ± 40.4 c193.6 ± 25.9 c5382.6 ± 483.5 a1024.6 ± 473.3 bc
ΣPUFA6580.0 ± 519.7 b6429.1 ± 627.8 b12,325.1 ± 497.9 a9466.6 ± 887.6 ab10,245.1 ± 1152.7 ab8128.8 ± 2541.6 b5079.1 ± 1126.1 b6459.1 ± 1712.6 b10,855.4 ± 776.6 a10,139.7 ± 1073.5 a11,872.5 ± 1531.5 a10,643.8 ± 1050.7 a
Σn-33537.2 ± 504.6 ab936.8 ± 89.8 c2661.5 ± 211.4 bc1591.8 ± 248.1 c4808.2 ± 503.8 a3838.8 ± 1239.8 ab2385.1 ± 567.5 bc830.6 ± 186.3 c2904.7 ± 212.5 b2199.35 ± 474.9 bc7323.9 ± 769.2 a2312.5 ± 636.2 bc
Σn-62853.7 ± 161.6 c5149.2 ± 479.1 bc9145.3 ± 608.2 a6976.9 ± 582.2 ab5083.4 ± 898.5 bc4032.7 ± 1280.3 c2326.8 ± 510.8 c5174.1 ± 1494.5 abc7382.3 ± 570.8 a6990.8 ± 644.1 ab4209.9 ± 719.2 bc7693.4 ± 1544.5 a
Note: SFA: Saturated fatty acid; MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acid. The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 9. The fatty acid composition in gonads of adult Eriocheir sinensis from different regions (mg/100 g wet weight).
Table 9. The fatty acid composition in gonads of adult Eriocheir sinensis from different regions (mg/100 g wet weight).
Male Female
CZPJHZEZYYJXCZPJHZEZYYJX
C14:0------117.99 ± 7.78 c111.03 ± 12.38 c169.75 ± 11.49 b94.34 ± 1.94 c215.56 ± 10.33 a105.7 ± 6.94 c
C15:0------38.48 ± 0.34 c81.21 ± 10.11 ab89.78 ± 4.22 a60.46 ± 2.25 b64.88 ± 2.68 b42.17 ± 3.26 c
C16:045.04 ± 4.31 c67.31 ± 10.20 c225.49 ± 20.53 a160.95 ± 13.22 b48.17 ± 8.68 c44.21 ± 4.21 c1698.15 ± 92.34 c2071.88 ± 77.61 b2716.76 ± 69.97 a1627.39 ± 54.99 c1909.47 ± 71.62 bc1750.53 ± 40.30 bc
C17:0------57.31 ± 2.05 c94.99 ± 1.49 b123.87 ± 10.30 a80.87 ± 2.05 bc74.36 ± 3.50 bc53.73 ± 4.45 c
C18:039.46 ± 3.92 c58.12 ± 8.97 bc123.78 ± 8.05 a103.88 ± 20.00 ab49.29 ± 6.62 c37.36 ± 2.01 c547.03 ± 28.86 c813.64 ± 14.41 b1167.53 ± 27.40 a627.74 ± 12.7 c540.28 ± 29.40 c598.15 ± 26.97 c
C20:029.89 ± 2.06 a18.36 ± 2.15 b20.28 ± 1.25 b23.68 ± 0.57 ab20.80 ± 1.66 b19.31 ± 0.99 b38.64 ± 1.34 d89.49 ± 5.74 b118.41 ± 5.26 a70.25 ± 1.57 c46.33 ± 3.17 d39.06 ± 1.50 d
C22:014.85 ± 0.8615.61 ± 1.2924.54 ± 1.1820.12 ± 4.4616.35 ± 0.5818.23 ± 1.2647.23 ± 4.53 c65.75 ± 3.06 ab78.19 ± 3.06 a46.29 ± 1.33 c59.66 ± 2.55 bc71.66 ± 4.29 ab
ΣSFA129.24 ± 2.14 c159.4 ± 22.29 c394.08 ± 15.8 a308.63 ± 12.54 b134.61 ± 15.5 c119.11 ± 7.3 c2544.84 ± 125.24 c3328 ± 107.56 b4464.27 ± 108.64 a2607.36 ± 66.74 c2910.55 ± 118.74 bc2661 ± 76.96 c
C16:133.16 ± 3.82 cd40.08 ± 2.65 bc62.01 ± 4.76 a52.59 ± 7.15 ab10.28 ± 0.81 d21.02 ± 0.53 d822.41 ± 81.19 d1761.89 ± 104.34 a1501.49 ± 41.72 ab1173.44 ± 50.18 bc1076.58 ± 94.23 cd1070.36 ± 8.83 cd
C18:1n9c79.89 ± 3.64 b66.47 ± 4.87 b276.15 ± 27.29 a233.07 ± 5.9 a84.12 ± 9.50 b81.76 ± 5.72 b2282.81 ± 136.66 c3647.52 ± 279.58 ab4393.19 ± 214.08 a2742.1 ± 136.18 c2619.72 ± 92.68 c2817.16 ± 155.04 bc
C20:113.26 ± 1.5811.65 ± 0.5715.55 ± 2.4113.68 ± 2.110.79 ± 0.319.52 ± 0.74111.86 ± 7.59 b65.83 ± 6.01 cd125.5 ± 3.60 b54.55 ± 3.77 d215.08 ± 6.29 a82.53 ± 4.33 c
C22:1n915.64 ± 1.69 c21.79 ± 1.93 bc30.25 ± 3.39 a25.47 ± 1.1 ab14.20 ± 2.04 c12.57 ± 1.39 c34.44 ± 4.14 c69.39 ± 3.75 b113.88 ± 2.82 a62.86 ± 3.71 b35.59 ± 1.22 c23.08 ± 1.86 c
C24:173.39 ± 11.4541.69 ± 14.385.87 ± 12.9391.35 ± 19.7383.47 ± 33.6945.95 ± 10.7214.40 ± 1.47 a10.35 ± 0.22 bc16.09 ± 0.68 a10.26 ± 0.41 bc13.82 ± 0.76 ab7.72 ± 0.25 c
ΣMUFA215.33 ± 13.58 b181.67 ± 15.72 b489.82 ± 17.95 a422.82 ± 12.05 a201.88 ± 22.09 b170.82 ± 7.72 b3265.92 ± 208.6 b5554.99 ± 167.51 a6150.15 ± 248.41 a4043.22 ± 111.24 b3960.80 ± 173.44 b4000.84 ± 155.7 b
C18:2n6c26.24 ± 1.68 cd37.44 ± 1.83 c142.86 ± 5.39 a109.04 ± 5.17 b30.68 ± 2.40 cd20.74 ± 0.91 d1430.18 ± 88.68 c1871.2 ± 63.5 b2662.16 ± 115.42 a1592.32 ± 88.97 bc1845.95 ± 130.47 b1200.64 ± 50.82 c
C18:3n3------133.62 ± 8.82 c516.1 ± 32.79 ab666.35 ± 12.51 a494.01 ± 71.07 b107.56 ± 10.40 c184 ± 16.61 c
C20:213.11 ± 2.18 c14.55 ± 1.93 c30.49 ± 5.99 b48.56 ± 2.2 a15.49 ± 0.52 c18.89 ± 0.44 bc77.47 ± 4.60 c151.44 ± 24.27 b220.53 ± 14.55 a179.58 ± 3.78 ab74.76 ± 8.77 c119.63 ± 14.27 bc
C20:3n6------10.43 ± 0.15 b35.99 ± 3.79 a43.75 ± 1.91 a38.23 ± 1.54 a13.07 ± 0.43 b15.88 ± 1.93 b
C20:3n3------41.46 ± 3.53 c63.99 ± 3.56 bc135.47 ± 5.13 a79.61 ± 14.66 b32.44 ± 1.37 c45.38 ± 5.44 c
C20:4n647.16 ± 2.43 bc35.65 ± 3.29 c125.07 ± 13.05 a105.6 ± 1.91 a69.27 ± 4.00 b42.05 ± 4.30 bc279.87 ± 8.62 b279.84 ± 22.24 b534.06 ± 40.69 a437.41 ± 51.53 a407.1 ± 27.59 ab287.24 ± 5.65 b
C20:5n348.76 ± 0.20 bc41.86 ± 1.91 c68.46 ± 4.35 a45.18 ± 3.23 c58.37 ± 2.72 ab47.23 ± 1.97 bc618.36 ± 58.10 b325.28 ± 16.14 c739.33 ± 22.26 b412.30 ± 12.53 c1122.55 ± 58.68 a667.45 ± 28.59 b
C22:6n355.72 ± 0.52 ab48.89 ± 0.44 ab49.92 ± 4.86 ab57.19 ± 2.13 a48.88 ± 0.54 ab42.86 ± 3.90 b635.18 ± 71.84 b180.85 ± 11.54 c859.67 ± 45.04 b222.98 ± 17.15 c683.35 ± 102.76 b1025.17 ± 52.48 a
ΣPUFA190.99 ± 2.72 cd178.41 ± 6.63 cd416.8 ± 18.83 a365.58 ± 4.22 b222.69 ± 6.95 c171.77 ± 10.82 d3226.57 ± 230.55 c3424.68 ± 80.4 bc5861.33 ± 232.88 a3456.43 ± 113.53 b4286.77 ± 327.95 b3545.39 ± 79.84 bc
Σn-3 104.48 ± 0.59 ab90.75 ± 2.23 b118.38 ± 7.05 a102.38 ± 1.73 ab107.25 ± 2.56 ab90.09 ± 5.87 b1441.80 ± 155.53 c1086.21 ± 20.51 d2400.82 ± 73.67 a1208.90 ± 77.32 cd1945.90 ± 99.31 b1922 ± 75.66 b
Σn-6 73.41 ± 1.47 cd73.10 ± 4.97 cd267.93 ± 15.46 a214.65 ± 6.54 b99.95 ± 4.87 c62.79 ± 5.19 d1737.47 ± 77.18 cd2187.04 ± 69.35 b3239.97 ± 152.76 a2067.96 ± 39.78 b2266.10 ± 124.1 bc1503.76 ± 49.86 d
Note: SFA: Saturated fatty acid; MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acid. The abbreviations stand for different regions. YY—Yongyan in Anhui province, PJ—Panjin in Liaoning province, HZ—Huzhou in Zhejiang province, JX—Jinxian in Jiangxi province, CZ—Changzhou in Jiangsu province, EZ—Ezhou in Hubei province. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, W.; He, Q.; Li, J.; Zhou, J.; Hua, G.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, G.; Tang, Y. Variability in Morphological Traits and Nutritional Profiles of Adult Eriocheir sinensis in Different Aquacultural Regions. Animals 2025, 15, 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020243

AMA Style

Feng W, He Q, Li J, Zhou J, Hua G, Xu Y, Jiang G, Tang Y. Variability in Morphological Traits and Nutritional Profiles of Adult Eriocheir sinensis in Different Aquacultural Regions. Animals. 2025; 15(2):243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Wenrong, Qinghong He, Jianlin Li, Jun Zhou, Guoan Hua, Yuanfeng Xu, Gang Jiang, and Yongkai Tang. 2025. "Variability in Morphological Traits and Nutritional Profiles of Adult Eriocheir sinensis in Different Aquacultural Regions" Animals 15, no. 2: 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020243

APA Style

Feng, W., He, Q., Li, J., Zhou, J., Hua, G., Xu, Y., Jiang, G., & Tang, Y. (2025). Variability in Morphological Traits and Nutritional Profiles of Adult Eriocheir sinensis in Different Aquacultural Regions. Animals, 15(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020243

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop