Error in Figure
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 5 as published. Due to the authors’ oversight during the proofreading stage, the published figure shows an incorrect image and does not correspond with the figure legend. Figure 5 of the published paper should be replaced with the correct figure showing the effectiveness of the July 2024 sterilization campaign in La Graciosa, Canary Islands.
The corrected Figure 5 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 5.
The effectiveness of the July 2024 sterilization campaign in La Graciosa, Canary Islands. The bar chart shows the number of neutered (green) versus unneutered (red) cats recorded across different feeding points in Caleta de Sebo and Pedro Barba immediately following the campaign. The pie chart inset illustrates the overall sterilization rate achieved, with 81.4% of the community cat population sterilized and 18.6% remaining unsterilized post-intervention.
Reference
- Luzardo, O.P.; Hansen, A.; Martín-Cruz, B.; Macías-Montes, A.; Travieso-Aja, M.d.M. Integrating Conservation and Community Engagement in Free-Roaming Cat Management: A Case Study from a Natura 2000 Protected Area. Animals 2025, 15, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).