Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Genetic Parameters of Growth of Pelibuey and Blackbelly Sheep through Pedigree in Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
Fish Oil Replacement by a Blend of Vegetable Oils in Diets for Juvenile Tench (Tinca tinca Linnaeus, 1758): Effects on Growth Performance and Whole-Body Composition
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Rearing Strategies on the Metabolizable Energy and SID Lysine Partitioning in Pigs Growing from 90 to 200 kg in Body Weight
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fishmeal Dietary Replacement Up to 50%: A Comparative Study of Two Insect Meals for Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/ani12060690
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fermentation of Soybean Meal with Lactobacillus acidophilus Allows Greater Inclusion of Vegetable Protein in the Diet and Can Reduce Vibrionacea in the Intestine of the South American Catfish (Rhamdia quelen)

by
Nandara Soares de Oliveira
1,
Natalia Ha
1,
Larissa da Cunha
1,
Luiz Augusto Cipriani
1,
André Thaler Neto
1,
Everton Skoronski
1,
Enric Gisbert
2 and
Thiago El Hadi Perez Fabregat
1,*
1
Departamento de Produção Animal, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina-UDESC, Avenue Luiz de Camões, 2090, Lages 88520-000, SC, Brazil
2
IRTA, Centre de Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Aquaculture Program, Carretera Poble Nou, km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la Ràpita, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(6), 690; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060690
Submission received: 20 January 2022 / Revised: 4 March 2022 / Accepted: 7 March 2022 / Published: 9 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fishmeal and Fish Oil Replacement in Aquaculture)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

There is a demand to replace fishmeal with protein sources of plant origin in fish feeds. Biotechnology strategies, such as fermentation, can improve the bioavailability of plant proteins and decrease the presence of antinutrients, optimizing the results obtained. Fermented soybean meal has already been evaluated for different fish species as a replacement for fishmeal, and there is evidence that it can improve the intestinal health of animals. Lactobacillus acidophilus is a strain used as a probiotic in fish feeding but it remains to be evaluated as a potential fermentation bacterium for feed ingredients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of diets containing different inclusion levels (0%, 7%, 14%, 21% and 28%) of soybean meal fermented by L. acidophilus (SMFL) on the zootechnical performance and intestinal health of South American catfish juveniles (Rhamdia quelen). The inclusion of SMFL up to 21% in replacement of fish meal did not affect the zootechnical performance of fish and also decreased the concentration of Vibrionaceae bacteria present in the intestine compared to the control group. The results demonstrate that fermentation with L. acidophilus enables greater inclusion of soybean protein in South American catfish diets and promotes the control of intestinal pathogenic bacteria.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of diets containing different inclusion levels (0%, 7%, 14%, 21% and 28%) of soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL) on the zootechnical performance and intestinal health of South American catfish juveniles (Rhamdia quelen). The experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and four replications and lasted 56 days. Five isoproteic (39% crude protein) and isoenergetic (4300 kcal of gross energy kg−1) diets were formulated where SMFL was included in replacement of fish meal. Two hundred forty South American catfish juveniles (3.0 ± 0.5 g) were distributed in 20 tanks (70 L) connected in a recirculation aquaculture system. At the end of the experiment, the inclusion of SMFL up to 21% in replacement of fish meal did not affect the zootechnical performance and also decreased the concentration of Vibrionaceae bacteria present in the intestine compared to the control group. The amount of total lactic and heterotrophic bacteria, the enzymatic activity and the intestinal morphometry did not differ between dietary treatments. The results demonstrate that fermentation with Lactobacillus acidophilus enables greater inclusion of soybean protein in South American catfish diets and promotes the control of intestinal pathogenic bacteria.

1. Introduction

Soybean meal is an ingredient that is the most common vegetal protein source in animal nutrition due to its availability and balanced amino acid profile [1,2]. However, the palatability of soybean meal is low [3], and there are problems with antinutritional factors that limit its use in feeding aquatic organisms [4]. Some of the antinutritional factors, such as trypsin inhibitors and hemagglutinants, are inactivated by the toasting process [5]. However, other factors are heat-stable, such as saponins, non-starch polysaccharides, antigenic proteins, and some phenolic compounds. Furthermore, the excess of oligosaccharides can impair the digestive process [5], and the presence of antinutritional factors such as phytic acid can impair protein digestibility [1].
Fermentation is a method that can enhance the quality of feed ingredients, inactivate antinutritional factors, improve nutritional bioavailability and increase soluble proteins and small peptides [6]. Fermented products are foods or beverages that serve as substrates for microorganisms, which through enzymes (amylases, proteases and lipases, among others), transform and reduce the size of organic compounds [7]. Fermented foods are part of the human diet due to their nutritional and functional qualities [8]. In recent years, the use of fermented ingredients as functional diets in aquaculture species has attracted the attention of academia and industry [9].
Microbial fermentation is carried out using fungi or bacterial strains [8]. Lactobacillus spp. are widely used in the process as they are considered nonpathogenic and safe bacteria [10]. Like other lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus spp. can inhibit other competing microorganisms by combining rapid carbohydrate utilization and lactic acid production [11]. Several strains of Lactobacillus spp. have functional properties and can be used in fermentation processes. Lactobacillus acidophilus are important microorganisms in the composition of the human intestinal microbiota [12]. This strain is used as a probiotic in fish feeding [10] as it has therapeutic activities on intestinal health and produces a variety of antimicrobial compounds that are effective against pathogenic bacteria [13]. Positive results have already been obtained with Lactobacillus spp. mixed cultures in the fermentation of soybean meal [14,15], but the use of L. acidophilus remains to be evaluated as a potential fermentation bacterium for feed ingredients.
Fermentation is an advantageous technique for nutritional improvement of soybean meal, through biodegradation and reduction of oligosaccharides and phytic acid, and for enhancement of the amino acid profile [16,17,18,19]. Fermentation also causes a release of bioactive peptides, which have functional properties in animal metabolism by modulating the immune system [20]. In studies with fish, the use of fermented soybean meal showed positive results on weight gain [21,22,23,24]. Enhancement in the intestinal health of fish fed with fermented soybean was observed, evidenced by the increase in beneficial bacteria in the intestinal microbiota [23,25,26], by the increase in the activity of gastrointestinal enzymes [27,28,29,30] and by the improvement of intestinal condition histological morphometric indexes [27,31,32,33,34].
The South American catfish (Rhamdia quelen) is an omnivorous species with a tendency to exhibit carnivore behavior [35]. Regarding nutrition, the South American catfish is considered a demanding fish in terms of quality [36] and quantity of protein [37]. Diets for this species are generally formulated with high levels of animal protein sources, whereas when fishmeal has been replaced with alternative protein sources such as soybean meal, the zootechnical performance of this species has been compromised [37,38]. In order to overcome such a limitation, fermentation may be used as a strategy for enabling higher levels of soy protein in compound feeds and for benefiting the intestinal health of the South American catfish. Therefore, the objective of this work is to evaluate the effect of diets containing different levels of inclusion of soybean meal fermented by L. acidophilus (SMFL) on the zootechnical performance and intestinal health condition of South American catfish juveniles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The experiment was carried out at the Santa Catarina State University (UDESC) Fish Farming Laboratory, in Lages, SC, Brazil. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) of UDESC (protocol number 4384210621). SMFL was evaluated at four levels (7%, 14%, 21% and 28%) of inclusion compared to a control diet (0%) during 56 days. The experimental design was completely randomized, with five treatments and four replications.

2.2. Production and Characterization of Fermented Soybean Meal

Soybean meal was fermented using an adaptation of the methodology of Azarm and Lee [39]. In brief, soybean meal and bacteria were purchased from local suppliers. Initially, the soybean meal was autoclaved (AV-100, Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil) at 100 °C for 20 min. For this purpose, the soybean meal was autoclaved at a temperature of 100 °C for 20 min and inoculated with L. acidophilus (strain LA14-1.109 CFU g−1, Aché, São Paulo, Brazil) in the proportion of 44 g kg−1. Then, deionized water was added in the proportion of 50% of the soybean meal weight (model ML 600, Marte, Brazil), and the mixture was placed in trays previously sterilized with 70% ethanol. The mixture was distributed in trays in order to obtain an average thickness of two centimeters and then placed in an incubator (SSDcr-336L, SolidSteel, Piracicaba, Brazil) at 36 °C. Every 12 h, the material was weighed to quantify the evaporated water, replaced and homogenized to maintain moisture at 50%. Every 24 h, up to a maximum time of 96 h, samples were collected from the material that was dried in the incubator until reaching a constant weight, and later kept in the freezer. To determine the optimum fermentation time, three different production cycles were carried out to analyze lactic acid bacteria, enzyme activity and soluble protein. To count lactic acid bacteria, 1 g samples of SMFL were serially diluted (1:10) in 0.65% sterile saline solution and plated on MRS (Man Rogosa Sharpe) agar culture medium (Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais. Brazil). Fermented soybean samples plated in Petri dishes were placed in an incubator, and the temperature was maintained at 35 °C. Total counts of colony-forming units (CFU) were performed after 48 h of incubation on agar.
Analyses of the enzymatic activity of α-amylase and total alkaline proteases were performed at different times of SMFL fermentation. Samples were placed in 50 mL tubes where they were diluted in chilled distilled water (1:6, w/v). The tubes were centrifuged (centrifuge K14-4000, Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) for 15 min at 4000 rpm, and the supernatants were used in the analyses. All assays were analyzed in duplicate in the three production runs described above. Alpha-amylase activity was measured (spectrophotometer Spectroquant Pharo300, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at λ = 580 nm using soluble starch (0.3%) as substrate in Na2HPO4 buffer solution (pH 7.4) [40]. A unit of α-amylase activity (U) was defined as a milligram of starch hydrolyzed in 30 min at 25 °C per milliliter of the supernatant.
The activity of total alkaline proteases was determined after 30 min of incubation (dry block incubator Model K80-200, Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) at 25 °C, using 0.5% (w/v) casein as substrate in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The reaction was stopped with trichloroacetic acid (20% w/v), the mixture was centrifuged (centrifuge K14-4000, Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) (5000 rpm, 20 min) and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured (spectrophotometer Spectroquant Pharo300, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at λ = 280 nm at room temperature. A unit of total alkaline protease activity (U) per milliliter was defined as 1 µmol of casein hydrolyzed per minute per milliliter of supernatant [41]. In order to measure the soluble protein, the fermented soybean meal samples were macerated until obtaining a fine powder. Then, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0, containing protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, 2 mM thiourea and 10 mM EDTA) and 2% (m/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, was added. Soluble protein was measured according to the Bradford method [42], using bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as a standard.
Based on lactic acid bacteria counts, enzymatic activity and bromatological composition, the time of 48 h for SMFL fermentation was determined. Samples were collected before and after fermentation for bromatological analysis [43], pH and amino acid profile [44] (Table 1). The amino acid composition of SMFL was determined according to White, Harty and Fry [44]. The pH was measured in solution, according to the potentiometric method described by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [45]. Ten grams of the samples were placed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, where 100 mL of distilled water at 25 °C was added. After adding water, the contents were mixed in an electronic shaker (model DT3110H, DiagTech, São Paulo, Brazil) for 30 min. The contents were placed in a 500 mL beaker and allowed to rest for 10 min, and then pH (model AT-355, Alfakit, Florianópolis, Brazil) was measured.

2.3. Experimental Diets

Five isoproteic (39% crude protein) and isoenergetic (about 4300 kcal of gross energy kg−1) diets were formulated, according to the nutritional requirement of the South American catfish [47], with five levels of inclusion (0%, 7%, 14%, 21% and 28%) of SMFL (Table 2). Dietary levels of crude lipids were 11.1%, 10.4%, 9.7%, 7.1% and 7.9%. The adjustment in the lipid levels was necessary to balance the energy levels of the diets. In addition to the fermented soybean meal, diets were formulated using corn and soybean oil as energy sources and fishmeal and soybean meal as protein sources. Marine fishmeal was purchased from Agroforte (Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil). The ingredients were crushed in a knife mill with a 2 mm diameter mesh sieve, mixed, pelleted (meat grinder MTU 08, Arbel, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil) with the addition of water (30%) and placed in an incubator (SSDcr-336L, SolidSteel, Piracicaba, Brazil) at 45 °C for 36 h. The proximal composition of experimental diets was analyzed using the methods described in AOAC [43]. The diets were stored in plastic containers and kept under refrigeration (4 °C) until the moment of use.

2.4. Animals and Facilities

Fish were acquired from Piscicultura Nossa Senhora Aparecida, located in the city of Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil), and previously acclimated to the experimental conditions. A total of 240 South American catfish juveniles (3.0 ± 0.5 g) were used, which were distributed in 20 polyethylene tanks with a useful volume of 70 L. The tanks were connected to a water recirculation system equipped with a mechanical and biological filter and a heating system. Fish were fed until apparent satiety, once a day, at 9 a.m. This feeding protocol has already been determined as suitable for the South American catfish [48].
Every day, organic waste was removed from the bottom of the tanks, and the presence of dead animals in the tanks was checked. Temperature (28.5 ± 0.3 °C), pH (7.12 ± 0.25) (HI98130, Hanna, Brazil) and dissolved oxygen (6.41 ± 0.54 mg L−1) (HI9147-10, Hanna, Barueri, Brazil) were monitored daily. Total ammonia was checked weekly (LabconTest, Alcon Pet, São Francisco de Assis, Brazil) (0.17 ± 0.2 mg NH3 L−1). Salinity was maintained around 4 g L−1 [49] in all polyethylene boxes throughout the experimental period. Water quality parameters remained within the recommended parameters for the cultivation of the South American catfish [50].

2.5. Productive Performance and Sample Collection

At the beginning and at the end of the experiment, biometrics were performed to assess the animals’ growth. All fish were anesthetized in a clove oil solution (1 g 10 L−1 of water) and individually weighed on a semianalytical digital scale with a precision of 0.01 g (model ML 600, Marte, São Paulo, Brazil). The following zootechnical performance indicators were evaluated: final weight, specific growth rate (SGR), apparent feed conversion (FC), feed ingestion (FI) and weight gain (WG). Mortality was recorded to assess the survival rate (S).
SGR % . day − 1 = In   final   weight − In   initial   weight experimental   period × 100
FC = feed   consumption total   weight   gain
FI g = total   feed   consumption tank
WG g = final   average   weight   FW − initial   average   weight   IW
S % = total   animals   harvested total   animals   stocked × 100
At the end of the experiment, two fish per replicate (eight fish per dietary treatment) were collected, anesthetized and euthanized for analysis of intestinal histomorphometry, intestinal microbiology and gastrointestinal tract enzyme activity.

2.6. Count of Total Heterotrophic, Lactic Acid and Vibrionaceae Bacteria

The intestinal tracts were homogenized, serially diluted (1:10) in sterile saline solution at 0.65% and seeded in the culture media with MRS (Man Rogosa Sharpe) agar (Kasvi, Brazil), TSA (tryptone soy agar) (Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) and TCBS (thiosulfate, citrate, bile and sucrose) agar (Acumedia, Indaiatuba, Brazil) to quantify lactic acid, total heterotrophic and Vibrionaceae bacteria, respectively. Intestinal samples were plated on Petri dishes and placed in incubators at 36 °C. Total counts of colony-forming units (CFU) were performed after 24 h of incubation in TSA and TCBS agar. In the MRS medium, the counts were performed after 48 h of incubation according to Jatobá et al. [51].

2.7. Enzyme Analysis

Stomachs and intestines were extracted through a longitudinal incision in the abdominal cavity and immediately frozen at −80 °C until the moment of analysis. The gastrointestinal tracts were weighed, ground and added in 50 mL tubes. The homogenates and total alkaline protease activity analysis were realized as described in Section 2.2. Lipase activity was measured at λ = 410 nm using p-nitrophenyl laurate (3 mM) in propanol as substrate [52]. The reaction was stopped by the addition of acetone [53]. A unit of lipase activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme required for the hydrolysis of 1 µmol of p-nitrophenyl laurate in 20 min at 25 °C per milliliter of enzyme extract.

2.8. Intestinal Morphometry

Sections of 3 cm in length were collected from the midgut (4 cm after the junction of the stomach and the intestine) and dipped in a 10% buffered formalin fixative solution for 24 h, which was replaced by 70% alcohol, remaining preserved until the evaluation of the morphohistological characteristics of the mucosa. For this purpose, the intestinal sections were cut into slices of approximately 0.3 cm, dehydrated with graded series of ethanol and embedded in histological paraffin. Paraffin blocks were cut in a rotating microtome, with 5 µm thick cuts.
Two slides were made from each sample, and the sections were stained according to the Harris eosin staining technique [54]. Slides were photographed using a digital camera (300 dpi) coupled to a microscope (10× objective). Fifteen villi of each fish were measured. Total height and height (corresponding to the distance from the apex of the villi to the beginning of the muscle layer and from the apex of the villi to the end of the serosa, respectively) and villous width values were measured using the ToupTek (Hangzhou, China) ToupView-x64 image analyzer software, version 2270/07/03.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were subjected to tests to verify the normality of errors (Shapiro–Wilk test) and homoscedasticity of variances (Levene test). Broken-line model, linear, and polynomial regressions were performed using the SAS statistical program, version 9.0. The model with the best coefficient of determination was chosen to estimate the response.

3. Results

The lactic bacteria count (Figure 1A; p = 0.0002; R2 = 0.86) and amylase activity (Figure 1B; p = 0.0106; R2 = 0.56) during soybean meal fermentation showed better fit to a quadratic equation. Values increased faster in the first 48 h. Protease activity (Figure 1C; p < 0.0001; R2 = 0.67) and soluble protein (Figure 1D; p < 0.0001; R2 = 0.85) showed a linear response with their values as fermentation time increased.
No fish mortality was observed throughout the experiment. Regarding growth and feed performance variables, the broken-line analysis showed that dietary SMFL levels close to 21% may be included in the diets for South American catfish juveniles without any negative effect on somatic weight gain (Figure 2A; p = 0.0002), specific growth rate (Figure 2B; p = 0.0002) or apparent feed conversion (Figure 2C; p = 0.0178) of South American catfish juveniles. There was a trend (mean 31.21 ± 3.84, p = 0.0978) towards a reduction in feed ingestion in inclusions of SMFL higher than 14%.
The count of Vibrionaceae in the intestine of South American catfish juveniles fed with SMFL showed a quadratic effect (Figure 3; p = 0.0316). Among the evaluated treatments, the lowest counts were observed in fish fed the diets containing 7%, 14% and 21% SMFL. There was no effect of SMFL inclusion on the count of heterotrophic bacteria (mean 3.32 ± 0.93 CFU g−1, p = 0.9827) or lactic acid bacteria (mean 3.01 ± 0.93 CFU g−1 p = 0.30)
The inclusion of SMFL did not modify the specific activity of total alkaline proteases (mean 1.43 ± 0.87 U mg−1 protein, p = 0.5404) or lipase (mean 1.47 ± 079 U mg−1 protein, p = 0.4612) in the digestive tract of South American catfish juveniles. Intestinal histomorphometry was also not affected. The inclusion of SMFL did not change the total height (mean 616.23 ± 144.94 µm, p = 0.3482), height (mean 481 ± 121.73 µm, p = 0.7533) or width (mean 88.09 ± 14.33 µm, p = 0.3486) of the intestinal villi of South American catfish juveniles.

4. Discussion

During fermentation, probiotic bacteria multiply and produce metabolites with bioactive properties [20]. Lactic acid bacteria increased in the SMFL from 0.00 to 5.80 CFU g−1 after 48 h of fermentation. These values are in agreement with the literature and demonstrate that the colonies grew as expected [18,55]. The colonies of lactic acid bacteria grew exponentially in the first 24 h of fermentation. After 48 h, growth stabilized, and this was considered the optimal fermentation time. As nutrients decrease and metabolites accumulate, the culture enters a stationary phase and reduces the production of organic compounds of interest [56]. As a result of fermentation, an increase in soluble protein and amino acids was observed. The increase in soluble protein is related to the presence of low-molecular-weight bioactive peptides [57] These peptides are also found in protein hydrolysates and can improve fish growth and intestinal health [58]. The synthesis of amino acids may be the result of lactic acid fermentation [8] and indicates an improvement in the nutritional value of SMFL. There was an increase in the activity of protease and amylase enzymes in SMFL. During fermentation, different types of enzymes are secreted by Lactobacillus [18], and SMFL can be a source of exogenous enzymes. Lactic acid is also secreted during fermentation, which leads to a drop in pH and can benefit the digestive process [59]. In the present study, the pH values remained relatively stable; the reduction in pH was from 6.64 to 6.47. It was not a significant decrease, but similar results were obtained using another bacterial species, Bifidobacterium animalis, in soybean fermentation [55].
The dietary inclusion of up to 21% SMFL replacing fishmeal did not affect the zootechnical performance of the South American catfish juveniles. The zootechnical parameters are within what is expected for the species [58,60], and this result confirms the efficiency of fermentation as a strategy to include a higher percentage of soybean meal in carnivorous fish feeds. It has been shown that soybean meal fermentation reduced the amounts of antinutritional factors and allowed greater inclusion of soybean meal in the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) diets [25]. Previous studies showed that an inclusion of above 35% soybean meal worsened the growth of the South American catfish [37]. In the present study, it was possible to include up to 46% soybean meal, considering the ingredients in the fermented and in the unfermented form. The higher inclusion of soybean meal may have been made possible by the improvement in the nutritional characteristics of the SMFL. Soybean meal fermentation increased soluble protein, indicating a higher proportion of low-molecular-weight peptides [57]. These peptides find specific absorption sites in the intestine, which results in more efficient absorption and thus compensates for the lower inclusion of fishmeal in diets [61].
The highest level of SMFL inclusion (28%) reduced the weight gain of South American catfish juveniles. The result obtained in this experiment corroborated other studies that included levels of fermented soybean meal between 24% and 30% [3,62,63,64]. At the highest levels of inclusion, there was a trend towards a reduction in food intake, indicating that possibly the antinutritional factors were not completely removed. In addition, another possible explanation is the increase in the soluble protein present in the fermented meal. At high levels of inclusion, excessive peptides can compromise their absorption due to saturation of transport mechanisms and thus reduce animal performance [65,66,67,68]. Furthermore, there may be an increase in amino acid oxidation and a reduction in dietary protein retention due to the large number of free peptides present in the fermented meal used in this study, which may also compromise their absorption [69]. These results indicated that more studies are still needed to clarify how the use of fermented ingredients affects protein absorption and how this knowledge may be applied for guaranteeing higher levels of SMFL in aquafeeds.
Increasing the inclusion of SMFL in the diets of South American catfish led to a reduction in dietary crude lipids. This adjustment was necessary to balance the energy levels of the diets. Although it is a protein source, SMFL does have moderate levels of starch and other carbohydrates that can be used as an energy source. South American catfish does not use carbohydrates as well as other omnivorous freshwater species, but it can adapt to different carbohydrate sources in diets [70]. Furthermore, if the energy intake had not been sufficient, an increase in the ingestion of these diets would be expected to compensate [71]. The result was the opposite: there was a tendency to reduce feed ingestion with the increase in the inclusion of SMFL in diets. Furthermore, we also find no differences in growth performance among fish fed diets differing in their crude lipid content (7.1–11%), which indicated that nutritional lipid requirements were already covered with the lowest crude lipid content tested (21% SMFL diet). These results are of relevance since they indicate that it is possible to reduce dietary lipid inclusion levels in diets for South American catfish juveniles when dietary crude protein (37.5–39.2%) and energy levels (4205–4300 kcal g−1) are covered.
In terms of microbial load in the intestinal mucosa, the inclusion of 21% SMFL promoted a decrease in bacteria from the family Vibrionaceae in the intestine of the South American catfish when compared to the control group. Cheng et al. [72] obtained a similar result with shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) when using fermented soybean meal, causing the reduction of two species of Vibrionaceae bacteria. Other authors have demonstrated that fermented soybean meal can improve the composition of the intestinal microbiota in fish [23,25,26]. Most of the bacteria in the fermented products die during the drying process; however, the residues of dead bacteria and their metabolites produced may have contributed to these positive results [25]. The fermented meal would work as a paraprobiotic additive in which the microorganisms are not in their viable form but still bring benefits to intestinal health [73]. Another explanation for the decrease in Vibrionaceae bacteria would be the presence of bioactive peptides that have antimicrobial activities and that are abundantly present in soybean meal [74]. It should be noted that at the highest level of SMFL inclusion, the same response was not obtained in terms of controlling Vibrionaceae bacteria. As performance was compromised in this treatment, the bacterial count may also have been affected.
Changes in the bacterial counts of Vibrionaceae were not related to changes in the abundance of heterotrophic and lactic acid bacteria in the intestine of South American catfish, which suggested that these changes in the Vibrionaceae were not due to competitive exclusion mechanisms with heterotrophic and lactic acid bacteria. Fermented ingredients are sources of probiotic bacteria and contain functional metabolites that can positively affect the intestinal microbiota of fish [73]. In the present study, due to technical limitations, only two fish were collected per replicate for each analysis. The low number of repetitions may have prevented the detection of differences between treatments. More studies are needed to understand the effects of ingesting fermented ingredients on intestinal bacteria counts. It is also necessary to evaluate, through molecular biology studies using massive sequencing approaches, the dietary effects of SMFL on autochthonous microbiota.
The enzymatic activity and the intestinal morphometry of South American catfish juveniles were not affected by the inclusion of SMFL. The use of fermented ingredients can bring benefits to intestinal health, such as increased enzymatic activity [27,28,29] and improvement of intestinal villi [16,27,31,32,33,34]. However, these beneficial effects were not seen in this study. One of the potential reasons for explaining such results was the low number of replicates used, which may have hampered detecting statistical differences among dietary groups. On the other hand, there are several factors involved in the fermentation process that may affect the functional properties of the fermented product [8]. Ranjan et al. [75] and Azarm and Lee [39] also did not observe changes in the digestive enzymes of Labeo rohita and Acanthopagrus schlegeli fed with fermented soybean meal. Even with no changes, the obtained results can be considered positive, as high inclusions of soybean meal can compromise the enzymatic activity [76,77] and the intestinal morphometry of fish [6]. Previous studies have shown that soybean meal fermentation can protect the fish intestinal epithelium from possible damage [25,78].

5. Conclusions

Fermentation of soybean meal with L. acidophilus improved its nutritional profile and microbiological load. In particular, there was an increase in lactic acid bacteria count, enzymatic activity and soluble protein in the SMFL. The inclusion of SMFL up to 21% as a strategy for replacing fishmeal did not affect zootechnical performance in terms of growth and feed efficiency performances, nor did it affect intestinal morphology or enzymatic activity (total alkaline proteases and lipase) in the gastrointestinal tract of South American catfish juveniles. The amount of the Gram-negative bacteria from the Vibrionaceae family in the intestine decreased with the inclusion of up to 21% SMFL. These results demonstrate that soybean meal fermentation with L. acidophilus enabled a greater inclusion of soybean protein in diets and also promoted the control of intestinal pathogenic bacteria.

Author Contributions

N.S.d.O.: contributions to conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting. N.H.: contributions to data acquisition, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. L.d.C.: contributions to data acquisition, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. L.A.C.: contributions to data acquisition, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. A.T.N.: data analysis and interpretation. E.S.: provision of study materials, reagents, materials and instrumentation. E.G.: contributions to revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. T.E.H.P.F.: contributions to conception and design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was conducted with support from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil (CAPES), Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) of UDESC (protocol number 4384210621, approved in July 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be available upon direct request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yasothai, R. Antinutritional factors in soybean meal and its deactivation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, 3793–3797. [Google Scholar]
  2. Iwashita, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Furuita, H.; Sugita, T.; Suzuki, N. Influence of certain soybean antinutritional factors supplemented to a casein-based semipurified diet on intestinal and liver morphology in fingerling rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish. Sci. 2008, 74, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liang, X.F.; Hu, L.; Dong, Y.C.; Wu, X.F.; Qin, Y.C.; Zheng, Y.H.; Shi, D.D.; Xue, M. Substitution of fish meal by fermented soybean meal affects the growth performance and flesh quality of Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 229, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zheng, L.; Li, D.; Li, Z.L.; Kang, L.N.; Jiang, Y.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Chi, Y.P.; Li, Y.Q.; Wang, J.H. Effects of Bacillus fermentation on the protein microstructure and anti-nutritional factors of soybean meal. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 65, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Francis, G.; Makkar, H.P.S.; Becker, K. Antinutritional factors present in plant-derived alternate fish feed ingredients and their effects in fish. Aquaculture 2001, 199, 197–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, D.G.; He, M.; Fang, H.; Wang, X.L.; Li, X.Q.; Leng, X.J. Replacement of fish meal with two fermented soybean meals in diets for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 26, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hutkins, R.W. (Ed.) Fermented vegetables. In Microbiology and Technology of Fermented Foods; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 223–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mukherjee, R.; Chakraborty, R.; Dutta, A. Role of fermentation in improving nutritional quality of soybean meal—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dawood, M.A.O.; Koshio, S.; Esteban, M.Á. Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: A review. Rev. Aquac. 2017, 10, 950–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Selle, K.M.; Klaenhammer, T.R.; Russel, W.M. Lactobacillus acidophilus . In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Batt, C.A., Tortorello, M.L., Eds.; Academic Press Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; Volume 1, pp. 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gaenzle, M.G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ray, B. Probiotics of lactic acid bacteria: Science or myth? In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Current Advances in Metabolism, Genetics and Applications; Bozoglu, T.F., Ray, B., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp. 101–136. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gopal, P.K. Lactic Acid Bacteria: Lactobacillus spp.: Lactobacillus acidophilus. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Gopal, P.K., Ed.; Academic Press: Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2011; pp. 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, C.; Liu, W.; Zhang, D.; Liu, J.; Xiaochuan, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yao, J.; Zhu, C.; Chi, C. Effects of partial fish meal replacement with two fermented soybean meals on the growth of and protein metabolism in the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17, 100328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, Y.; Lu, M.; Chen, G.; Cao, J.; Gao, F.; Wang, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, H.; Yi, M. Efects of dietary Lactobacillus rhamnosus JCM1136 and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis JCM5805 on the growth, intestinal microbiota, morphology, immune response and disease resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 76, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jannathulla, R.; Rajaram, V.; Kalanjiam, R.; Kondusamy, A.; Moturi, M.D.; Dayal, J.S. Fishmeal availability in the scenarios of climate change: Inevitability of fishmeal replacement in aquafeeds and approaches for the utilization of plant protein sources. Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 3493–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rahimnejad, S.; Lu, K.; Wang, L.; Song, K.; Mai, K.; Davis, D.A.; Zhang, C. Replacement of fish meal with Bacillus pumillus SE5 and Pseudozyma aphidis ZR1 fermented soybean meal in diets for Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 84, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rui, X.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Dong, M. Optimization of soy solid-state fermentation with selected lactic acid bacteria and the effect on the anti-nutritional components. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016, 41, e13290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, C.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Mao, X.; Zheng, P.; Chen, P. Solid state fermentation of rapeseed cake with Aspergillus niger for degrading glucosinolates and upgrading nutritional value. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 6, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sanjukta, S.; Rai, A.K. Production of bioactive peptides during soybean fermentation and their potential health benefits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kari, Z.A.; Kabir, M.A.; Mat, K.; Rusli, N.D.; Razab, M.K.A.A.; Ariff, N.S.N.A.; Wei, L.S. The possibility of replacing fish meal with fermented soy pulp on the growth performance, blood biochemistry, liver, and intestinal morphology of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rahimnejad, S.; Zhang, J.J.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, C. Evaluation of Bacillus pumillus SE5 fermented soybean meal as a fish meal replacer in spotted seabass (Lateolabrax maculatus) feed. Aquaculture 2021, 531, 735975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, C.; Zhang, B.; Liu, C.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Mai, K.; He, G. Effects of dietary raw or Enterococcus faecium fermented soybean meal on growth, antioxidant status, intestinal microbiota, morphology, and inflammatory responses in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 100, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, S.; Ding, G.; Song, F.; Sang, C.; Wang, A.; Chen, N. Comparison of dehulled, fermented and enzyme-treated soybean meal in diets for largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides: Effects on growth performance, feed utilization, immune response and intestinal morphology. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 267, 114548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, M.; Yu, Y.; Li, X.; Poolsawat, L.; Yang, P.; Bian, Y.; Leng, X. An evaluation of replacing fish meal with fermented soybean meal in the diets of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides): Growth, nutrition utilization and intestinal histology. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 4302–4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Catalán, N.; Villasante, A.; Wacyk, J.; Ramírez, C.; Romero, J. Fermented soybean meal increases lactic acid bacteria in gut microbiota of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dawood, M.A.O.; Eweedah, N.M.; Khalafalla, M.M.; Khalid, A.; Asely, A.E.; Fadl, S.E.; Ahmed, H.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases the acceptability of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to date palm seed meal. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17, 100314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Phulia, V.; Sardar, P.; Sahu, N.P.; Fawole, F.J.; Shamna, N.; Gupta, S. Substitution of soybean meal with fermented Jatropha kernel meal: Effect on growth performance, body composition, and metabolic enzyme activity of Labeo rohita. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 44, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sotoudeh, E.; Moghaddam, J.A.; Shahhosseini, G.; Aramli, M.S. Effect of dietary Gamma-irradiated and fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, body composition, and digestive enzymes activity of Caspian brown trout, Salmo trutta caspius, juvenile. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2016, 47, 830–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shamna, N.; Sardar, P.; Sahu, N.P.; Pal, A.K.; Jain, K.K.; Phulia, V. Nutritional evaluation of fermented Jatropha protein concentrate in Labeo rohita fingerlings. Aquac. Nutr. 2015, 21, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dawood, M.A.O. Nutritional immunity of fish intestines: Important insights for sustainable aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 642–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, P.; Golly, M.K.; Guo, Y.; Ma, H.; He, R.; Luo, X.; Zhu, J. Effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with high-temperature fermented soybean meal in antibiotic-growth-promoter-free diets on growth performance, organ weights, serum indexes, intestinal flora and histomorphology of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 269, 114616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chachaj, R.; Sembratowicz, I.; Krauze, M.; Ognik, K. The effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with fermented soybean meal on chicken performance and immune status. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2019, 28, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Feng, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, Z.R.; Lu, Y.P.; Liu, Y.Y. The effect of Aspergillus oryzae fermented soybean meal on growth performance, digestibility of dietary components and activities of intestinal enzymes in weaned piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 134, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gomes, L.D.C.; Golombieski, J.I.; Gomes, A.R.C.; Baldisserotto, B. Biologia do jundiá Rhamdia quelen (TELEOSTEI, PIMELODIDAE). Cienc. Rural 2000, 30, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oliveira Filho, P.R.C.D.; Fracalossi, D.M. Coeficientes de digestibilidade aparente de ingredientes para juvenis de jundiá. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2006, 35, 1581–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lazzari, R.; Baldisserotto, B. Nitrogen and phosphorus waste in fish farming. Bol. Inst. Pesca 2008, 34, 591–600. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lazzari, R.; Radünz Neto, J.; Pedron, F.D.A.; Loro, V.L.; Pretto, A.; Gioda, C.R. Protein sources and digestive enzyme activities in jundiá (Rhamdia quelen). Sci. Agric. 2010, 67, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Azarm, H.M.; Lee, S. Effects of partial substitution of dietary fish meal by fermented soybean meal on growth performance, amino acid and biochemical parameters of juvenile black sea bream Acanthopagrus schlegeli. Aquac. Res. 2014, 45, 994–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Métais, P.; Bieth, J. Determination of alpha-amylase by a microtechnic. Ann. Biol. Clin. 1968, 26, 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  41. García-Careño, F.L.; Haard, N.F. Characterization of proteinase classes in langostilla (Pleuroncodes planipes) and crayfish (Pacifastacus astacus) extracts. J. Food Biochem. 1993, 17, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Association of Official Analytical Chemists—AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; AOAC: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000; p. 389. [Google Scholar]
  44. White, J.A.; Hart, R.J.; Fry, J.C. An evaluation of the Waters Pico-Tag system for the amino-acid analysis of food materials. J. Autom. Chem. 1986, 8, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lane, R.H. Cereal Foods. In Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed.; Association of Official Agricultural Chemists: Arlington, TX, USA, 1995; Volume 2, p. 143. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rostagno, H.S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Hannas, M.I.; Donzele, J.L.; Sakomura, N.K.; Perazzo, F.G.; Saraiva, A.; Teixeira, M.L.; Rodrigues, P.B.; Oliveira, R.F.; et al. Tabelas Brasileiras Para Aves e Suínos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais, 4th ed.; UFV-Departamento de Zootecnia: Viçosa, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  47. Meyer, G.; Fracalossi, D.M. Protein requirement of jundiá fingerlings, Rhamdia. Aquaculture 2004, 240, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martinelli, S.G.; Radünz Neto, J.; Silva, L.P.D.; Bergamin, G.T.; Maschio, D.; Della Flora, M.A.L.; Nunes, L.M.C.; Possani, G. Densidade de estocagem e frequência alimentar no cultivo de jundiá em tanques-rede. Pesq. Agropecu. Bras. 2013, 48, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Camargo, S.G.O.; Pouey, J.L.O.F.; Vaz, B.S. Efeito da salinidade nos parâmetros hematológicos do jundiá (Rhamdia quelen–Quoy & Gaimard, 1824). R. Bras. Agrociênc. 2006, 12, 453–460. [Google Scholar]
  50. Baldisseroto, B.; Radünz Neto, J. Criação de Jundiá; UFSM: Santa Maria, Brazil, 2004; pp. 73–94. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jatobá, A.; Vieira, F.D.N.; Buglione Neto, C.; Silva, B.C.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Jerônimo, G.T.; Martins, M.L. Lactic-acid bacteria isolated from the intestinal tract of Nile tilapia utilized as probiotic. Pesq. Agropecu. Bras. 2008, 43, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Brabcová, J.; Prchalová, D.; Demianová, Z.; Bučánková, A.; Vogel, H.; Valterová, I.; Pichová, I.; Zarevúcka, M. Characterization of neutral lipase BT-1 isolated from the labial gland of Bombus terrestris males. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pastore, G.A.M.; Costa, V.S.S.R.; Koblitz, M.G.B. Purificação parcial e caracterização bioquímica de lipase extracelular produzida por nova linhagem de Rhizopus sp. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 23, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Behmer, O.A.; Tolosa, E.M.C. Manual de Técnicas Para Histología Normal e Patológica, 2nd ed.; Manole: São Paulo, Brazil, 2003; p. 331. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, S.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shang, W.; Gao, X.; Wang, H. Whole soybean as probiotic lactic acid bacteria carrier food in solid-state fermentation. Food Control 2014, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chisti, Y. Fermentation (Industrial) Basic Considerations. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Batt, C.A., Tortorello, M.L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hong, K.J.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, S.W. Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 fermentation improves nutritional quality of food soybeans and feed soybean meals. J. Med. Food 2004, 7, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ha, N.; Jesus, G.F.A.; Gonçalves, A.F.N.; Oliveira, N.S.; Sugai, J.K.; Pessatti, M.L.; Fabregat, T.E.H.P. Sardine (Sardinella spp.) protein hydrolysate as growth promoter in South American catfish (Rhamdia quelen) feeding: Productive performance, digestive enzymes activity, morphometry and intestinal microbiology. Aquaculture 2019, 500, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Filannino, P.; Di Cagno, R.; Gobbetti, M. Metabolic and functional paths of lactic acid bacteria in plant foods: Get out of the labyrinth. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Uczay, J.; Battisti, E.K.; Lazzari, R.; Pessatti, M.L.; Schneider, T.L.S.; Hermes, L.B.; Fabregat, T.E.H.P. Fish meal replaced by hydrolysed soybean meal in diets increases growth and improves the antioxidant defense system of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Aquac. Res. 2019, 50, 1438–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wosniak, B.; Melim, E.W.H.; Ha, N.; Uczay, J.; Pilatti, C.; Pessatti, M.L.; Fabregat, T.E.H.P. Effect of diets containing different types of sardine waste (Sardinella sp.) protein hydrolysate on the performance and intestinal morphometry of silver catfish juveniles (Rhamdia quelen). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2016, 44, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Seong, M.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Song, Y.; Bae, J.; Chang, K.; Bai, S.C. The effects of different levels of dietary fermented plant-based protein concentrate on growth, hematology and non-specific immune responses in juvenile olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture 2018, 483, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, S.M.; Azarm, H.M.; Chang, K.H. Effects of dietary inclusion of fermented soybean meal on growth, body composition, antioxidant enzyme activity and disease resistance of rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli). Aquaculture 2016, 459, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shiu, Y.L.; Hsieh, S.L.; Guei, W.C.; Tsai, Y.T.; Chiu, C.H.; Liu, C.H. Using Bacillus subtilis E20-fermented soybean meal as replacement for fish meal in the diet of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides, H amilton). Aquac. Res. 2013, 46, 1403–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Siddik, M.A.; Howieson, J.; Partridge, G.J.; Fotedar, R.; Gholipourkanani, H. Dietary tuna hydrolysate modulates growth performance, immune response, intestinal morphology and resistance to Streptococcus iniae in juvenile barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Wei, Y.; Liang, M.; Mai, K.; Zheng, K.; Xu, H. The effect of ultrafiltered fish protein hydrolysate levels on the liver and muscle metabolic profile of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) by 1H NMR-based metabolomics studies. Aquac. Res. 2016, 48, 3515–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xu, H.; Mu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Liang, M.; Zheng, K.; Wei, Y. Graded levels of fish protein hydrolysate in diets rich in plants for turbot (Scophthalmus maximus): Effects on growth performance and lipid accumulation. Aquaculture 2016, 454, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khosravi, S.; Bui, H.T.D.; Rahimnejad, S.; Herault, M.; Fournier, V.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, K.J. Dietary supplementation of marine protein hydrolysates in fish-meal based diets for red sea bream (Pagrus major) and olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquaculture 2015, 435, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wei, Y.; Liang, M.; Xu, H. Fish protein hydrolysate affected amino acid absorption and related gene expressions of IGF-1/AKT pathways in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquac. Nutr. 2020, 26, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gominho-Rosa, M.; Rodrigues, A.P.O.; Mattioni, B.; de Francisco, A.; Moraes, G.; Fracalossi, D.M. Comparison between the omnivorous jundiá catfish (Rhamdia quelen) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) on the utilization of dietary starch sources: Digestibility, enzyme activity and starch microstructure. Aquaculture 2015, 435, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vivas, M.; Rubio, V.C.; Sánchez-Vázquez, F.J.; Mena, C.; García, B.G.; Madrid, J.A. Dietary self-selection in sharpsnout seabream (Diplodus puntazzo) fed paired macronutrient feeds and challenged with protein dilution. Aquaculture 2006, 251, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cheng, A.C.; Lin, H.L.; Shiu, Y.L.; Tyan, Y.C.; Liu, C.H. Isolation and characterization of antimicrobial peptides derived from Bacillus subtilis E20-fermented soybean meal and its use for preventing vibrio infection in shrimp aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 67, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Choudhury, T.G.; Kamilya, D. Paraprobiotics: An aquaculture perspective. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chai, T.T.; Tan, Y.N.; Ee, K.Y.; Xiao, J.; Wong, F.C. Seeds, fermented foods, and agricultural by-products as sources of plant-derived antibacterial peptides. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59 (Suppl. S1), S162–S177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ranjan, A.; Sahu, N.P.; Deo, A.D.; Kumar, H.S.; Kumar, S.; Jain, K.K. Comparative evaluation of fermented and non-fermented de-oiled rice bran with or without exogenous enzymes supplementation in the diet of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 44, 1037–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, H.; Jin, J.; Zhu, X.; Han, D.; Yang, Y.; Xie, S. Effect of substitution of dietary fish meal by soybean meal on different sizes of gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio): Digestive enzyme gene expressions and activities, and intestinal and hepatic histology. Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 23, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, C.; Rahimnejad, S.; Wang, Y.R.; Lu, K.; Song, K.; Wang, L.; Mai, K. Substituting fish meal with soybean meal in diets for Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus): Effects on growth, digestive enzymes activity, gut histology, and expression of gut inflammatory and transporter genes. Aquaculture 2018, 483, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, L.; Zhou, H.; He, R.; Xu, W.; Mai, K.; He, G. Effects of soybean meal fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum P8 on growth, immune responses, and intestinal morphology in juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Aquaculture 2016, 464, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 00690 g001a 550Animals 12 00690 g001b 550
Figure 1. Lactic acid bacteria count (A), amylase activity (B), protease activity (C) and soluble protein (D) of soybean meal fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL) at different times of fermentation. Lactic acid bacteria count (CFU g−1): y = −0.001x2 + 0.1752x − 0.5475, R2 = 0.86, p = 0.002. Amylase activity (U g−1): y = −0.000041x2 + 0.0062x − 0.0438, R2 = 0.56, p = 0.0106. Protease activity (U g−1): y = 0.000075 + 0.00736, R2 = 0.67, p < 0.0001. Soluble protein (mg g−1): y = 0.2830x + 22.6624, R2 = 0.85 p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. Lactic acid bacteria count (A), amylase activity (B), protease activity (C) and soluble protein (D) of soybean meal fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL) at different times of fermentation. Lactic acid bacteria count (CFU g−1): y = −0.001x2 + 0.1752x − 0.5475, R2 = 0.86, p = 0.002. Amylase activity (U g−1): y = −0.000041x2 + 0.0062x − 0.0438, R2 = 0.56, p = 0.0106. Protease activity (U g−1): y = 0.000075 + 0.00736, R2 = 0.67, p < 0.0001. Soluble protein (mg g−1): y = 0.2830x + 22.6624, R2 = 0.85 p < 0.0001.
Animals 12 00690 g001aAnimals 12 00690 g001b
Animals 12 00690 g002 550
Figure 2. Weight gain (A), specific growth rate (SGR) (B) and feed conversion (C) of South American catfish fed with diets containing different levels of soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL). Weight gain: Y = 28.9506 − 1.5489(X − 21.6785), Y = 28.9506 when X < 21.6785. The breakpoint of the broken line is 21.6% (p = 0.0002). SGR: Y = 4.2187 − 0.1134(X − 21.0458), Y = 4.2187 when X < 21.0458. The breakpoint of the broken line is 21.04% (p < 0.0001). Feed conversion: Y = 1.1106 + 0.0326(X − 22.8846), Y = 1.1106 when X < 22.8846. The breakpoint of the broken line is 22.8% (p = 0.0178).
Figure 2. Weight gain (A), specific growth rate (SGR) (B) and feed conversion (C) of South American catfish fed with diets containing different levels of soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL). Weight gain: Y = 28.9506 − 1.5489(X − 21.6785), Y = 28.9506 when X < 21.6785. The breakpoint of the broken line is 21.6% (p = 0.0002). SGR: Y = 4.2187 − 0.1134(X − 21.0458), Y = 4.2187 when X < 21.0458. The breakpoint of the broken line is 21.04% (p < 0.0001). Feed conversion: Y = 1.1106 + 0.0326(X − 22.8846), Y = 1.1106 when X < 22.8846. The breakpoint of the broken line is 22.8% (p = 0.0178).
Animals 12 00690 g002
Animals 12 00690 g003 550
Figure 3. Count of Vibrionaceae (CFU g−1) in the intestine of South American catfish fed with diets containing different levels of soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Y = 0.0053x2 − 0.1484 + 3.6279, R2 = 0.2755, p = 0.0316.
Figure 3. Count of Vibrionaceae (CFU g−1) in the intestine of South American catfish fed with diets containing different levels of soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Y = 0.0053x2 − 0.1484 + 3.6279, R2 = 0.2755, p = 0.0316.
Animals 12 00690 g003
Table
Table 1. Analysis of bromatological composition, pH and amino acids of soybean meal and soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL).
Table 1. Analysis of bromatological composition, pH and amino acids of soybean meal and soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL).
Soybean Meal *SMFL
Proximal composition (%)
Crude protein44.8243.99
Ethereal extract5.234.19
Dry matter88.3590.64
Mineral matter7.427.75
pH6.646.47
Essential amino acids (%)
Arginine3.353.47
Histidine1.201.31
Isoleucine2.132.00
Leucine3.513.84
Lysine2.873.14
Methionine0.610.60
Phenylalanine2.342.73
Valine2.222.38
Threonine1.781.98
Nonessential amino acids (%)
Proline2.312.63
Cystine0.670.72
Alanine2.032.33
Aspartic acid3.225.86
Glutamic acid4.449.12
Glycine1.972.15
Serine2.462.70
Tyrosine1.661.74
Sum of amino acids (%)38.7748.70
* Amino acid profile according to Rostagno [46].
Table
Table 2. Formulation and analyzed composition of experimental diets.
Table 2. Formulation and analyzed composition of experimental diets.
Experimental Diets
Ingredients (%)SMFL 0%SMFL 7%SMFL 14%SMFL 21%SMFL 28%
Soybean meal25.025.025.025.025.0
Corn9.59.08.58.58.5
Wheat flour12.012.012.012.012.0
Fishmeal46.540.534.528.022.0
SMFL0.07.014.021.028.0
Soybean oil6.05.55.04.53.5
Premix 11.01.01.01.01.0
Centesimal composition
Crude protein (%)39.1938.7438.4337.9337.45
Gross energy (kcal kg−1)4298.934314.774205.534219.674333.41
Ethereal extract (%)11.0510.389.717.097.87
Mineral matter (%)14.6212.8611.5710.279.63
Dry matter (%)91.2191.3891.5091.7992.30
Essential amino acids (%)
Lysine3.383.223.082.932.88
Methionine1.000.920.850.770.70
Arginine2.182.262.362.442.48
Threonine1.831.821.771.731.71
Leucine3.513.453.413.363.32
Isoleucine2.462.372.282.192.12
Valine2.512.432.362.272.22
Histidine1.081.071.061.051.05
1 Folic acid—2400 mg, nicotinic acid—48 g, pantothenic acid—24 g, biotin—96 mg, vit. A—2,400,000 IU, vit. D3—400,000 IU, vit. E—24,000 IU, vit. B1—9600 mg, vit. B2—9600 mg, vit. B6—9600 mg, vit. B12—9600 mg, vit. K3—4800 mg, vit. C—96 g, iron—100 g, manganese—40 g, zinc—6000 mg, cobalt—20 mg, iodine—200 mg, selenium—200 mg, antioxidant—19.6 g. Soybean meal fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus (SMFL).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Oliveira, N.S.; Ha, N.; da Cunha, L.; Cipriani, L.A.; Neto, A.T.; Skoronski, E.; Gisbert, E.; Perez Fabregat, T.E.H. Fermentation of Soybean Meal with Lactobacillus acidophilus Allows Greater Inclusion of Vegetable Protein in the Diet and Can Reduce Vibrionacea in the Intestine of the South American Catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Animals 2022, 12, 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060690

AMA Style

de Oliveira NS, Ha N, da Cunha L, Cipriani LA, Neto AT, Skoronski E, Gisbert E, Perez Fabregat TEH. Fermentation of Soybean Meal with Lactobacillus acidophilus Allows Greater Inclusion of Vegetable Protein in the Diet and Can Reduce Vibrionacea in the Intestine of the South American Catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Animals. 2022; 12(6):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060690

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Oliveira, Nandara Soares, Natalia Ha, Larissa da Cunha, Luiz Augusto Cipriani, André Thaler Neto, Everton Skoronski, Enric Gisbert, and Thiago El Hadi Perez Fabregat. 2022. "Fermentation of Soybean Meal with Lactobacillus acidophilus Allows Greater Inclusion of Vegetable Protein in the Diet and Can Reduce Vibrionacea in the Intestine of the South American Catfish (Rhamdia quelen)" Animals 12, no. 6: 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060690

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop