Next Article in Journal
Effect of First Long-Term Training on Whole Blood Count and Blood Clotting Parameters in Thoroughbreds
Next Article in Special Issue
Nutrient Incorporation in First Feeding Seahorses Evidenced by Stable Carbon Isotopes
Previous Article in Journal
Chronological Expression of PITX2 and SIX1 Genes and the Association between Their Polymorphisms and Chicken Meat Quality Traits
Previous Article in Special Issue
Yucca schidigera Usage for Healthy Aquatic Animals: Potential Roles for Sustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Boswellia serrata Resin Extract in Diets of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Effects on the Growth, Health, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance to Staphylococcus aureus

1
Department of Science and Technology, University College, Ranyah, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Fish Diseases and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
4
Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
5
Department of Fish Health and Management, Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (CLAR), Agriculture Research Center, Abbassa, Abo-Hammad, Sharkia 44662, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(2), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020446
Submission received: 10 January 2021 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 2 February 2021 / Published: 8 February 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The current study evaluated the effects of Boswellia serrata resin extract (BSRE) as a feed additive on the growth performance, immune response, antioxidant status, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish were fed on four basal diets complemented with four levels of BSRE 0, 5, 10, or 15 g kg−1. The results of this study proposed that BSRE addition can enhance the antioxidant activity, immune status, and disease resistance of O. niloticus to S. aureus infection. The level of 5 g kg−1 BSRE can improve fish growth without causing harmful effects on fish health. Higher levels of BSRE are not recommended as they badly affected the histoarchitecture of many vital organs.

Abstract

The influences of Boswellia serrata resin extract (BSRE) as a feed additive on the growth performance, immune response, antioxidant status, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. were assessed. One hundred-forty four fingerlings (initial weight: 21.82 ± 0.48 g) were randomly allotted into four groups with three replicates where they were fed on one of four treatments with four levels of Boswellia serrata resin extract 0, 5, 10, or 15 g kg−1, BSRE0, BSRE5, BSRE10, BSRE15, respectively for eight weeks. After the end of the feeding trial, the fish were challenged with Staphylococcus aureus, and mortalities were noted. The final body weight, total body weight gain, and the total feed intake were quadratically increased in BSRE5 treatment (p < 0.01). The protein productive efficiency (PPE) was linearly and quadratically increased in all BSRE supplemented treatments (p < 0.01). Dietary addition of BSRE raised the fish crude protein content and reduced the fat content in a level-dependent manner (p < 0.01). The ash content was raised in the BSRE15 group (p < 0.01). Dietary BSRE supplementation decreased the serum levels of glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and nitric oxide. It increased the serum levels of total protein, albumin, total globulins, α1 globulin, α2 globulin, ß globulin, ɣ globulin, Catalase, and SOD (superoxide dismutase) activity, GSH (reduced glutathione), lysozyme activity, and MPO (myeloperoxidase) in a level-dependent manner (p < 0.05). The BSRE15 diet increased the serum level of ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and decreased creatinine serum level (p < 0.05). Dietary BSRE supplementation increased the relative percentage of survival % (RPS) of S. aureus challenged fish. The histoarchitecture of the gills and kidney was normal in the BSRE5 treatment and moderately changed in BSRE10 and BSRE15 treatments. The splenic lymphoid elements were more prevalent, and the melano-macrophage centers (MMC) were mild to somewhat activated in BSRE supplemented treatments. Dietary BSRE supplementation improved the intestinal histomorphology. It can be concluded that BSRE addition can enhance the antioxidant activity, immune status, and disease resistance of O. niloticus to S. aureus infection. The level of 5 g kg−1 BSRE can improve fish growth without causing harmful effects on fish health. The highest levels of BSRE are not recommended as they badly affected the histoarchitecture of many vital organs.

1. Introduction

Recently, aquaculture production has witnessed a boom to fill the needs of the fish shop. Fish is the main food in most developing countries, which leads to increased demand [1]. Worldwide production of tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) has been increasingly growing at a rate of 10% since 2001, making it one of the main and rapidly developing aquaculture species [2]. Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is one of the most widely cultured species in many tropical countries. The fish’s response to stress conditions depends on the stress factor (crowding, hypoxia, temperature, presence of heavy metals, etc.) and the fish features such as fish species, age, or gender. Such stressful conditions can increase the spread of pathogenic bacteria and cause severe disease outbreaks [3,4].
Staphylococcus aureus is a dangerous pathogen isolated from society and healthcare centers worldwide. The importance of S. aureus is owing to the rapid occurrence of antibiotic resistance among most of its isolates and the secretion of virulence factors that donate to their invasiveness and ability to disease [5]. Its pathogenicity is mostly related to genetic characteristics that mediate virulence, immune evasion, invasive capacity, and antibiotic resistance [6]. It is the third most common reason for foodborne disease worldwide and is the most common factor in food poisoning outbreaks [7]. The prohibition on antibiotics as feed additives has hastened research and resulted in extensive studies on alternative feed additives in aquaculture diets. These alternatives, such as phytogenic feed additives, include herbs, resins, or spices that enrich the diet with many volatile substances and aromatic compounds. These supplements enhance health status, growth performance, and fish immunity [8,9,10].
Boswellia serrata resin, olibanum or frankincense, is obtained from the Burseraceae family [11,12], which grows in dry and arid regions Yemen and Oman, India, northeast Africa [13]. This old medicine is thought to have antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anxiolytic, and anti-cancer effects [14]. These medicinal effects are related to various aromatic compounds, such as the main active principle boswellic acid [15,16]. Moreover, boswellia serrata resin contains volatile oils which composed of sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes [17,18], diterpenes such as cembrenol (serratol), incensole, and incensole acetate [18,19], lipophilic pentacyclic triterpene acids of the oleanane (α-boswellic acids), ursane-(β-boswellic acids) and lupane-type (lupeolic acids), and an ether-insoluble fraction containing polysaccharides (arabinose, galactose, xylose) [20]. It is approved that Boswellia serrata resin is safe, and its use as a feed additive is allowed by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) [21]. The medicinal abilities of Boswellia serrata have been established by several investigators and have been well acknowledged in the works [22,23,24,25]. There are no data about their aptness for use in aquaculture and their effects on fish growth, immunity, and health status. So, this study, for the first time, evaluated the potential impacts of using Boswellia serrata resin extract on the growth performance, immune response, disease resistance, and antioxidant status of Oreochromis niloticus.

2. Material and Methods

The current study was carried out in the central laboratory for aquaculture research (CLAR), Abo-Hammad, Alsharqia, Egypt. The study protocol was confirmed by the Ethics of Animal Use in Research Committee of Zagazig University (ZU-IACUC/2/F/190/2019). The experimental procedures were accomplished following the National Institute of Health general guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in scientific investigations.

2.1. Boswellia Serrata Resin Extraction

The hard, dry Boswellia serrata resin was grounded to a fine powder then extracted with ethyl alcohol (95%) by Soxhlet apparatus (VELP SCIENTIFICA) till complete extraction then evaporated to a thick syrup of brown color, which was undergoing Spectroscopic analysis (The GC-mass techniques, the regional center for Mycology and Biotechnology Al-Azhar University, Egypt) that revealed the richness of BSRE with terpenes (Figure 1A) especially diterpenes (Incensole isomer) with an area of 19.97% with the elemental analysis indicates the chemical formula is C20H34O2 (Figure 1B). The triterpenes, especially methyl Commate A (boswellic acids), methyl Commate B (Oleanolic acid), and methyl Commate C (Sulfurenic acid) with an area of 15.95, 15.95, and 13.63% for methyl Commate A, B, and C with the elemental analysis indicates the chemical formula as C32H52O4, C31H50O3, and C31H50O4 for methyl Commate A, B, and C, respectively (Figure 1C–E).

2.2. Fish and Cultural Conditions

Healthy O. niloticus fingerlings (N = 144, initial body weight 21.82 ± 0.48 g) were examined for pre-trial health status following the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, CCAC [26] then randomly distributed in twelve 100-L static glass aquaria (12 fish/ aquarium) supplied with dechlorinated tap water with a daily exchange of about 25% of water and continuous aeration using electric air pumping compressors with an air stone for two weeks, and fish were fed on a basal diet before the onset of the experiment. The water quality parameters were kept under the same conditions, including temperature (28.3 ± 1.1 °C), dissolved oxygen (6.18 ± 0.4 mg/L), pH (6.9 ± 0.1), and ammonia (0.035 ± 0.01 mg/L) with a controlled photoperiod (12 h light: 12 h dark) in the laboratory according to American Public Health Association [27].

2.3. The Experimental Design and Diets Preparation

Fish were randomly allocated into four groups in triplicates (12 fish/replicate) for eight weeks. The experimental treatments consisted of basal diets complemented with four levels of Boswellia serrata resin extract 0, 5, 10, or 15 g kg−1, BSRE0, BSRE5, BSRE10, BSRE15, respectively. The basal diet (Table 1) was formulated and customized to fill the recommended nutritional needs of Nile tilapia, according to the National Research Council, NRC [28]. The ingredients were mechanically mixed and pelletized using a pellet machine, ultimately producing pellets of 1.5 mm diameter. The prepared diets were air-dried at room temperature for 24 h and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C until use. Proximate chemical analysis of diets was carried out according to AOAC [29]. Fish were manually fed till satiation daily at 8.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.

2.4. Growth Performance, Proximate Chemical Composition of the Whole-Fish Body, and Economic Efficiency of the Feed

Fish were weighed at the beginning of the experiment, then fish body weights and feed intake were recorded every two weeks. The following growth performance parameters were calculated as follow;
Total body weight gain (TBWG) = Final body weight (g) − Initial body weight (g)
Average daily feed intake (ADFI) (g/fish/day) = total feed intake/ number of feeding days.
FCR = total feed intake (g)/total weight gain (g).
PER = total weight gain (g)/protein intake (g).
Protein productive value (PPV) = Protein gain (g)/protein intake (g).
The whole fish-body composition was analyzed at the beginning of the experiment (10 fish/stock) and the experiment’s end (three fish/ tank). Fish samples were analyzed for moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and total ash, according to AOAC [29].
Efficiency measures were calculated according to El-Telbany and Atallah [30], Dunning and Daniels [31] as follow:
Feed cost (USD) = the cost of one kg of each diet × the amount of total feed intake (kg) during the experimental period (70 days).
Feed cost/kg gain (USD) = Total feed cost/Total weight gain (kg).

2.5. Sampling

By the end of the feeding trial (8 weeks), nine fish/group were randomly selected and anesthetized with 95 mg L−1 clove oil (Oleum, Cairo, Egypt) within 3 min [32], and blood samples were collected from the caudal blood vessels of fish with clean and sterile syringes without anticoagulant then serum was separated by centrifuging at 3000 RPM for 10 min. The attained serum was used for the evaluation of some blood biochemical parameters. Moreover, gills, kidneys, spleen, and posterior intestinal tissues were sampled for further histological investigation.

2.6. Blood Biochemical Parameters

Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were measured by the colorimetric diagnostic kits of spectrum-bioscience (Egyptian Company for Biotechnology, Cairo, Egypt) following the procedures of Allain et al. [33], McGowan et al. [34], and Trinder [35], respectively. The qualitative fractionation of serum proteins was carried out using cellulose-acetate electrophoresis, according to Kaplan and Savory [36].

2.7. Antioxidant Activity

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, catalase (CAT) activity, and reduced glutathione (GSH) level in fish serum were measured by commercial colorimetric kits purchased from Biodiagnostic Co., Cairo, Egypt, and following the procedures of Nishikimi et al. [37], Aebi [38], and Beutler [39], respectively.

2.8. Immunological Assessment

The lysozyme activity was analyzed using the lysoplate technique according to the method of Grinde [40]. The activity of MPO and NO level was measured following Quade and Roth [41] and Moshage [42], respectively.

2.9. Histopathological Investigation

Samples from the fish gills, kidney, spleen, and posterior intestinal tissues were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h, dehydrated in gradual ascending ethanol, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin (5 micrometers thick) was sliced by a microtome (Leica RM 2155, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin [43]. Intestinal morphometric analysis was carried out according to Pirarat et al. [44].

2.10. Bacterial Challenge

After the feeding trial ended, all fish were intraperitoneally injected with the pathogenic bacterium Staphylococcus aureus at a dose of 0.2 mL suspension containing 4 × 106 cells/mL by McFarland standard tubes. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated before from the dead fish and established to be pathogenic for O. niloticus by the Department of Fish Diseases and Management of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Zagazig University. Staphylococcus aureus identification was made by conservative biochemical tests and VITEK 2-C15 automated system (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) following manufacturer’s instructions as described by [45,46] at Microbiology and Immunology Department, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Giza, Egypt. All groups were kept under observation for 14 days to record any abnormal clinical signs and daily mortalities. Fish mortalities were used to calculate the relative percentage survival “RPS” according to the formula of Amend [47]. RPS = 100 − [(treatment mortality ÷ control mortality) × 100].

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Before statistical analysis, the normality of distribution and homogeneity of variances between different treatments were tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Bartlett’s test, respectively, and the assumption was achieved (p > 0.05). ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) test was used based on polynomial orthogonal contrasts. Linear and quadratic regression equations were performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) Version 17 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) at a significance value of p < 0.05. Post-hoc Tukey’s test was applied to determine differences among means, and the variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

3. Result

3.1. Growth Performance, Fish Whole-Body Composition, and Economic Value

The effects of dietary Boswellia serrata resin extract on the growth performance of O. niloticus are shown in Table 2. Quadratic increase in the FBW, TBWG, ADFI, and the total FI was observed in fish fed on the BSRE5 diet by 8.95%, 16.92%, and 15.15%, respectively, compared to those fed on the BSRE0 diet (p < 0.01). The protein productive efficiency was increased linearly and quadratically in all BSRE supplemented treatments by 45.71, 30.98, and 35.28% for BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15, respectively (p < 0.01). The FCR and PER were not significantly affected by BSRE supplementation (p > 0.05). Based on the average daily feed intake, the daily dose of BSRE extract consumed per fish was 4.28 ± 0.07, 8.08 ± 0.27, 11.37 ± 0.18 mg for BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15, respectively.
Table 3 shows the fish’s whole-body composition. The crude protein content was linearly and quadratically increased in BSRE supplemented diets by 44.62, 39.71, and 35.71% for BSRE5 BSRE10, and BSRE15 groups, respectively, compared to the BSRE0 group (p < 0.01). The fat content decreased linearly and quadratically in BSRE supplemented diets by 49, 53.03, and 63.23% for BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 groups, respectively, compared to the BSRE0 group (p < 0.01). The ash content was linearly and quadratically increased in the BSRE15 group by 37% compared to the BSRE0 group (p < 0.01).
As shown in Figure 2, the feed cost was quadratically increased when fed on the BSRE5 diet compared to the BSRE0 diet and BSRE15 diet (p = 0.002). However, the feed cost/kg gain was not significantly different between all experimental diets (p > 0.05).

3.2. Serum Biochemical Parameters

As presented in Table 4, linear and quadratic reduction in the serum levels of glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides was detected in all BSRE supplemented treatments in a level-dependent manner. Dietary BSRE supplementation linearly and quadratically elevated the serum levels of total protein, albumin, α2 globulin, ɣ globulin, linearly raised the serum levels of total globulins, α1 globulin, and ß globulin in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). The serum ALT level was linearly and quadratically decreased in the BSRE5 group and increased in the BSRE15 group compared to the BSRE0 group (p < 0.01). The serum level of creatinine was linearly reduced in the BSRE15 group compared to the BSRE0 group (p < 0.01).

3.3. Antioxidant Activity and Immune Indices

The effects of dietary BSRE on the antioxidant and immune status of O. niloticus are presented in Table 5. The linear and quadratic rise in the serum catalase activity and linear increase in the serum SOD activity and GSH level was observed in BSRE supplemented groups in a level-dependent manner (p < 0.01).
The serum lysozyme activity and MPO level were linearly and quadratically increased in BSRE supplemented groups in a level-dependent manner. The serum nitric oxide level was linearly and quadratically decreased in BSRE supplemented groups in a level-dependent way (p < 0.01).

3.4. Histological Finding

3.4.1. Gills

Examined sections from the gills of the control group revealed normal histomorphological structures, the primary and secondary gill filaments were standard with normal pavement cells, lamellar epithelial cells, pillar cells, mucus-secreting cells (goblet cells), chloride cells, capillary channels (afferent and efferent venules), and a few mononuclear cells (Figure 3A). Gills of the BSRE5 group denoted minor changes, as the tips of a few filaments revealed epithelial lifting and stromal round cell infiltration (Figure 3B). Gills of the BSRE10 group revealed comparatively normal histomorphological structures in most of the examined cases; however, a few cases revealed focal changes at the tip of the gill filament represented by focal denudation of the secondary filament structures (epithelial lifting and necrosis, round cell infiltration and chloride cell proliferation (Figure 3C). Gills of the BSRE15 group pointed out comparatively somewhat morphopathological changes more prominent than the other groups. Some filaments’ tips appeared focally denuded, fused, thick, and enlarged by severely congested capillaries, epithelial proliferation, and round cell infiltration (Figure 3D).

3.4.2. Intestine

Investigated sections of the posterior intestine of the control group revealed a histomorphology similar to the anterior one; however, the villi are broad and short, the crypts are deeper, and the mucosal epithelial lining is free of cilia and contains more goblet cells. The mucosa appeared to be formed from a single epithelial layer of columnar cells, followed by the lamina propria and ill-distinct muscularis mucosa. The submucosa showed loose CT, reticular and elastic fibers beside some adipocytes. It encloses blood vessels and lymphatics. The muscular coat is formed from an inner circular and outer longitudinal smooth muscle fiber. A thin mesothelial layer encoded the outermost muscle layer (serosa) (Figure 4A). The posterior intestines of all BSRE treated groups were nearly similar to the control group; however, a mild to moderate number of lymphocyte infiltrating the lamina epithelialis was seen, which was most prominent in the BSRE10 group (Figure 4B–D).

3.4.3. Kidney

Serial sections from the control group’s kidneys pointed out normal renal glomerular, tubular, and interstitial structures with preserved Bowman’s capsular histomorphology, glomerular capillary morphology, and tubular epithelial length and widths with a centrally located nucleus. Minimal degenerative changes were seen in a few numbers of renal tubules (Figure 5A). Kidneys of BSRE supplemented groups showed comparatively healthy, normal counterparts of the nephron units with a slandered morphological appearance which was more standardized and homologous to the control one in the BSRE5 and less standardized in BSRE10, BSRE15, where a more renal tubule suffered degenerative changes most of the hydropic type (Figure 5B–D).

3.4.4. Spleen

The spleen of the control group showed characteristic proliferative aggregations of melano-macrophages, both perivascular and interstitial. The blood vessels and the splenic sinusoids were mild to moderately congested, and the latter occupied large areas of the tissue constituting the spleen’s red pulp. Splenic cords are a mesh of fibro-blast-like cells with foci of various blood cells. White pulp, consisting mainly of lymphoid cells, typically surrounds arterial vessels, sometimes assuming a nodular pattern. Melano macrophage centers (MMC) form small clusters in the parenchyma. The melano macrophage (MM) is a distinct immune cell type prevalent in the spleen (Figure 6A). The spleen of BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 revealed histomorphological structures comparable to the control group. Still, the lymphoid elements were more prevalent, particularly around the small size blood vessels forming aggregations or ill distinct nodular arrangement and the splenic cords were outstanding, especially in BSRE10. Melano-macrophage centers (MMC) were mild to moderately activated (Figure 6B–D).

3.5. Intestinal Morphometric Measurements

Table 6 highlights the morphometric measurements of the posterior section of the intestine. The villous height was linearly and quadratically increased in the BSRE5 group while it was decreased in BSRE10 and BSRE15 groups in comparison with the BSRE0 group (p < 0.01). The villous width was linearly and quadratically increased in BSRE supplemented group compared to the control group (p < 0.01). The mucosal thickness was linearly and quadratically increased in the BSRE5 and BSRE10 groups while it was decreased in the BSRE15 group (p < 0.01). Linear and quadratic increase in the intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltration was detected in the BSRE10 group and decreased in the BSRE5 group (p < 0.01). The goblet cell count was not significantly different between all experimental groups (p > 0.05).

3.6. Challenge Test

The dietary addition of BSRE improved the resistance of O. niloticus to Staphylococcus aureus challenge in terms of RPS % by 66.67, 75, 83.33% for BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 treatments, respectively.

4. Discussion

The data available for the effects of Boswellia serrata resin extract in fish diets are almost entirely scarce. Consequently, the current study was performed to illustrate the influence of BSRE as a feed additive on growth performance, general health, and immune response of O. niloticus. As an initial experiment, feeding O. niloticus on BSRE supplemented diets triggered no mortalities between all treated groups, which helped us eliminate the ID50. The present study reported improved FBW, TBWG, and total FI of fish fed on the BSRE5 diet. The PPV was increased in BSRE supplemented diets. However, no effect on the FCR by the addition of BSRE. The increased BW and BWG in the BSRE5 group in the current study may be due to the improved feed intake compared to the control group and other BSRE-complemented groups. As well, the improved growth performance in the BSRE5 diet may be attributed to the enhanced intestinal histology reported in this study that was indicated by increased villus height, villus width, and mucosal thickness, consequently improving the intestinal absorptive surface for nutrients. Amer et al. [8] reported that using phytogenic feed additives, particularly medicinal plants, leads to improved fish performance efficiency as it can augment gut function [9,10,48,49,50]. This coordinates with the intestinal morphometric measurements of the villus heights and the count of goblet cells, which secrete mucus to coat and keep the intestinal mucosa from damage, dehydration, and pathogens [51,52]. Caspary [53] determined that the intestinal villus length influences the absorption, which increases the feed utilization. Additionally, the higher intestinal villus heights and goblet cells count indicating an improvement in nutrient absorption, resistance against intestinal pathogens due to enhancing capacity of absorptive surface area, and so considered as a growth promoter. Gabriel et al. [54] recorded a marked improvement in the weight gain and specific growth rate in GIFT (genetically improved farmed tilapia) tilapia fed on aloe vera. Mukherjee et al. [55] stated enhanced growth and innate immunity of Nile tilapia by the dietary addition of Withania somnifera root extracts. However, higher levels of BSRE (10 and 15 g kg−1) did not affect the fish growth, which may be due to the hypolipidemic effect of BSRE bioactive compounds (boswellic acid and oleanolic acid), which observed in the fish body composition in the present study. Wang et al. [56] presented that oleanolic acid administration to mice (20 mg/kg/day) caused reduced body, fat, and liver weights.
Although the feed cost in the BSRE5 diet was increased, the feed cost/kg gain was not significantly different between all experimental diets. The increased feed cost was due to the increased feed intake in the BSRE5 group compared to other groups. However, due to the increased TBWG in the BSRE5 group compared to other groups, the feed cost/kg gain became not significantly different. Regarding the fish body composition results, dietary supplementation of BSRE increased the crude protein content and reduced the fat content in a level-dependent manner while the ash content was increased in the BSRE15 group. The obtained results may be attributed to the BSRE content from boswellic acid reported stimulating pancreatic enzyme secretion that improves protein and energy digestibility and decreases endogenous losses of nitrogen, ammonia production [57], in addition to having an antihyperlipidemic activity [58]. It was reported that oleanolic acid and boswellic significantly decreased visceral fat, plasma lipids, ghrelin, and increased leptin in obese Swiss mice [59].
Serum biochemical and innate immune parameters are crucial health pointers [60,61]. The blood glucose level is a significant physiological indicator estimating fish health conditions. It is mobilized to provide metabolic energy in fish [62] and used by fish to deal with physiological stress, acting as a useful stress tolerance indicator [62]. The BSRE acts as a hypoglycemic agent regarding serum glucose levels, which is a good sign of lowered stress [63]. The hypoglycemic effect of BSRE is due to its content from boswellic acid and oleanolic acid. The mechanism by which the boswellic acid induces the hypoglycemic effect is through increased peripheral glucose utilization and inhibition of intestinal glucose transporter activity, as reported in [58]. Whereas the hypoglycemic activity of oleanolic acid is carried out by improving the insulin response, it maintains the function and survival of β-cells and prevents complications of diabetes. Oleanolic acid may control the enzymes involved in insulin biosynthesis, signaling, and secretion [64]. Wang et al. [56] demonstrated that oleanolic acid’s hypoglycemic activity occurs through glucose improvement, insulin tolerance, enhancement of insulin signaling, and inhibition of gluconeogenesis.
Moreover, our results indicated a hypolipidemic effect of BSRE in a level-dependent manner, which could also be because of its content from boswellic acid and oleanolic acid. Jadhav and Puchchakayala [58] investigated the antihyperlipidemic activity of boswellic acid. Wang et al. [56] stated that oleanolic acid administration to mice (20 mg/kg/day) reduced the serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, and free fatty acids and decreased the accretion of hepatic lipid through downregulation of lipogenic genes expression (stearoyl-CoA desaturase 2 [SCD2], acetyl-CoA carboxylase [ACC], acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase [ACAT], and glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase [Gpam]) [59]. Oleanolic acid and correlated triterpenes have important therapeutic properties such as antidiabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, microbicide, and hypolipidemic actions [65,66].
The current study showed a reduced ALT level in the BSRE5 group while its level was increased in the highest level of BSRE (BSRE15). Additionally, the creatinine level was reduced in the BSRE15 group. ALT is a standard indicator of liver disease, and increased serum levels indicate liver damage [67]. The reduced liver function also led to reduced creatine production and decreased creatinine levels in the blood due to reduced storage of creatine and reduced conversion of creatine to creatinine [68]. This indicates that increasing the level of BSRE badly affects liver function, which may be explained by liver overload by increasing the level of the bioactive compounds presents in BSRE that responsible for the stimulated immune system, hypoglycemic, and antihyperlipidemic effects where the liver is the site of production of serum total protein and its fractions and the organ of glucose and fat metabolism. The same was observed in the kidney and gill histoarchitectures, which showed moderate changes in BSRE10 and BSRE10 treatments.
Serum total protein, albumin, and globulin are effective indicators of humoral immunity and fish well-being as the essential components of blood serum, especially globulin, which is a protein fraction involved in the immune response [63,69], and its increase implies an enhancement in the fish immune system [10]. In the current study, the increased total serum protein, albumin, total globulin, and immunological globulin suggesting the immune-modulatory effect of BSRE in a level-dependent manner. Similarly, Syrovets et al. (2000) attributed the potent induction of the non-specific immune response by BSRE to their bioactive compounds (polysaccharides, incensol acetate, and boswillic acids), which act as an immune stimulant [12,70]. This supports our results of the increased intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltration and the splenic cords (Billroth’s cords or red pulp cords) outstanding, especially in BSRE10. These splenic cords are reservoirs of monocyte clusters that total more than the total number of monocytes in the circulation. They can be rapidly organized to leave the spleen and help treat persistent infections [71], indicating the improved ability to clear microbial antigens from the gut in BSRE10 and BSRE15, as the intestine is the primary infection route for pathogens in fish [72,73]. The melano-macrophage centers (MMC) were mild to moderately activated in splenic tissue of fish fed BSRE. El-Asely et al. [74] recorded increased MMC in Nile tilapia fed a diet supplemented by Echinacea purpurea. Additionally, Ledic-Neto et al. [75] stated that feeding Nile tilapia on a diet complemented with propolis (2%) for 15 days displayed increased melano-macrophage centers, despite the difference between treatments disappeared seven days later, suggesting physiological adaptation to the supplements.
Conversely, Brum et al. [76] found that at 55 days of feeding fish on a diet supplemented with 0.5% basil exhibited a reduction in the count of melano-macrophages centers. Despite this, there was no difference in the area of the spleen they engaged, and it could be said that the centers of macrophages and melanocytes in these animals were less distributed. Considering that their results were obtained after 55 days of feeding on a supplemented diet, it may be explained as a physiological adaptation to the supplemented diet. The current study results coordinate with Mukherjee et al. [55] who detected an elevation in the plasma levels of total protein and total immunoglobulin of Nile tilapia by dietary addition of W. somnifera root extracts.
The fish’s innate immunity is the main line of protection against invading pathogens. The lysozyme activity and nitric oxide (NO) are important components of the innate immune system that play a vital role in destroying pathogens [77]. Our results illustrated that BSRE increased the lysozyme activity in a level-dependent manner, which coordinates with the result of total protein and maybe explained by the potent non-specific stimulation of the innate immune system by BSRE bioactive compounds; polysaccharides, incensol acetate, and boswillic acids, which considered as an immune stimulant as mentioned by [12,70]. Engstad et al. [78] stated that increased lysozyme in the blood of stimulated fish is conducted either by the proliferated phagocytes or the increased productivity of lysosomes. Pratheepa and Sukumaran [79] demonstrated that the increased lysozyme activity could be because of increasing the blood neutrophils and monocytes of fish fed diet fortified with plant extract compared to that found in the control diet. The results of the present study are coordinated with Mukherjee et al. [55] who reported an increase in the lysozyme activity in Nile tilapia fed on a diet fortified with W. somnifera root extract. Furthermore, myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a neutrophil released enzyme that is an essential constituent of protection against pathogens [80] and has a vital function for the innate immune response [81]. The current study results showed increased MPO production in BSRE supplemented groups in a level-dependent manner that also indicates the immune-modulating effect of BSRE. These results harmonize with that obtained by Kurian et al. [81] who stated the activation of fish peroxidase when fed on herbal immune stimulants.
Staphylococcus aureus has been recently reported in Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) triggering high mortality with various pathological alterations [82]. It also poses health risks to fish handlers and consumers [83]. In addition, in aquaculture, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been isolated from tilapia in Malaysia [84]. It has also been related to mortality and morbidity in the culture of Nile tilapia in northern Egypt [85].
In the current study, BSRE supplementation increased the survivability of Nile tilapia challenged with S. aureus in a dose-dependent manner. The increased survivability may be due to the stimulation of innate and non-specific immune responses by BSRE supplementation and its bioactive compounds, which have antibacterial, immune-modulatory, anti-inflammatory properties [65,66,86]. Similarly, Kurian et al. [81] indicated that Nile tilapia fed Leucas Aspera showed markedly improved resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae infection compared to the control. The dietary addition of BSRE decreased the serum level of NO in a level-dependent manner. The reduced NO production can be attributed to the inhibition of the NO production and on the generation of NO synthase caused by the bioactive components of BSRE as sesquiterpenes [87], diterpenes [88,89], and triterpenes [90]. Furthermore, Yoshikawa et al. [91] indicated inhibition of nitric oxide production from lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages caused by the mono and triterpenes constituents of Boswellia carterii gum-resin.
The antioxidant enzymes protect the fish body from oxidative alterations that resulted from increased ROS production [92,93]. The superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione peroxidase level, and catalase activity are significant indicators for estimating the antioxidant activity in aquatic organisms [94,95]. Our study reported increased levels of antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, and GSH) in BSRE supplemented groups in a level-dependent manner that can be attributed to the bioactive triterpenes (boswellic acids and oleanolic acid) that possess antioxidant activity [96,97,98] through increasing the expression of the antioxidant enzymes [64]. Similarly, Sharma et al. [99] reported the antioxidant activity of aqueous extract of B. serrate in a level-dependent manner. Afsar et al. [100] demonstrated the invitro antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of Boswellia serrate due to its content of flavonoids, terpenoids, tannins, saponins, anthraquinones.

5. Conclusions

Dietary addition of Boswellia serrata resin extract can enhance the antioxidant activity, immune status, and disease resistance of O. niloticus to S. aureus infection in a level-dependent manner. The 5 g kg−1 BSRE level can improve fish growth without causing harmful effects on fish health. The highest levels of BSRE are not recommended as they badly affected the histoarchitecture of many vital organs. Further research is recommended to be carried out on lower levels of BSRE and to evaluate the effects of its addition on the histopathological examination of the liver.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.A.E.-A., H.M.E.-S., A.A.K., M.H., S.A.A., G.E.-N., M.M.M., and M.E.E.-s.; Methodology: D.A.E.-A., H.M.E.-S., A.A.K., M.H., S.A.A., G.E.-N., and M.M.M., M.E.E.-s.; Software and data curation: S.A.A.; Writing—original draft preparation: S.A.A., H.M.E.-S., D.A.E.-A., A.A.K., M.H., and G.E.-N.; Writing—reviewing and editing: S.A.A., H.M.E.-S., D.A.E.-A., A.A.K., M.H., G.E.-N., M.M.M., and M.E.E.-s. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out using the facilities and materials in Taif University Research-es Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/139), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethics of the experimental protocol were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Zagazig University, Egypt (ZU-IACUC/2/F/190/2019). The experimental procedures were accomplished following the National Institute of Health general guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in scientific investigations.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out using the facilities and materials in Taif University Researches Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/139), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia. The authors extend their appreciation to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018–Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global Aquaculture Production 1950–2010; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Allam, N.G.; Shabana, S.A.; Osman, Y.A.; Nouh, H.S. Prevalence of some virulence factors among Gram negative bacteria isolated from patients with lung infection and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Egypt. J. Bot. 2019, 59, 633–643. [Google Scholar]
  4. Annabi, A.; Said, K.; Messaoudi, I. Cadmium: Bioaccumulation, histopathology and detoxifying mechanisms in fish. Am. J. Res. Commun. 2013, 1, 62. [Google Scholar]
  5. El-baz, R.; Rizk, D.E.; Barwa, R.; Hassan, R. Virulence characteristics and molecular relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus harboring different staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 113, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ahmed, S.H.; Tolba, S.; Al Zawahry, Y.A. Evaluation of the role of bla genes in beta lactam and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Egypt. J. Bot. 2019, 59, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arfatahery, N.; Mirshafiey, A.; Abedimohtasab, T.; Zeinolabedinizamani, M. Study of the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus in marine and farmed shrimps in Iran aiming the future development of a prophylactic vaccine. Procedia Vaccinol. 2015, 9, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Amer, S.A.; Metwally, A.E.; Ahmed, S.A. The influence of dietary supplementation of cinnamaldehyde and thymol on the growth performance, immunity and antioxidant status of monosex Nile tilapia fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2018, 44, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Omar, A.E.; Al-Khalaifah, H.S.; Mohamed, W.A.; Gharib, H.S.; Osman, A.; Al-Gabri, N.A.; Amer, S.A. Effects of Phenolic-Rich Onion (Allium cepa L.) Extract on the Growth Performance, Behavior, Intestinal Histology, Amino Acid Digestibility, Antioxidant Activity, and the Immune Status of Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Khalaifah, H.; Khalil, A.A.; Amer, S.A.; Shalaby, S.I.; Badr, H.A.; Farag, M.F.; Altohamy, D.E.; Abdel Rahman, A.N. Effects of Dietary Doum Palm Fruit Powder on Growth, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance of African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (B.). Animals 2020, 10, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Thulin, M.; Warfa, A.M. The frankincense trees (Boswellia spp., Burseraceae) of northern Somalia and southern Arabia. Kew Bull. 1987, 42, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hosain, N.A.; Ghosh, R.; Bryant, D.L.; Arivett, B.A.; Farone, A.L.; Kline, P.C. Isolation, structure elucidation, and immunostimulatory activity of polysaccharide fractions from Boswellia carterii frankincense resin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hamm, S.; Bleton, J.; Connan, J.; Tchapla, A. A chemical investigation by headspace SPME and GC–MS of volatile and semi-volatile terpenes in various olibanum samples. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1499–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Vuuren, S. Antimicrobial activity of South African medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Camarda, L.; Dayton, T.; Di Stefano, V.; Pitonzo, R.; Schillaci, D. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of some oleogum resin essential oils from Boswellia spp. (Burseraceae). Ann. Di Chim. J. Anal. Environ. Cult. Herit. Chem. 2007, 97, 837–844. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mannino, G.; Occhipinti, A.; Maffei, M.E. Quantitative Determination of 3-O-Acetyl-11-Keto-βBoswellic Acid (AKBA) and Other Boswellic Acids in Boswellia sacra Flueck (syn. B. carteri Birdw) and Boswellia serrata Roxb. Molecules 2016, 21, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Singh, B.; Kumar, R.; Bhandari, S.; Pathania, S.; Lal, B. Volatile constituents of natural Boswellia serrata oleo-gum-resin and commercial samples. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Niebler, J.; Buettner, A. Identification of odorants in frankincense (Boswellia sacra Flueck.) by aroma extract dilution analysis and two-dimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry/olfactometry. Phytochemistry 2015, 109, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Harrasi, A.; Csuk, R.; Khan, A.; Hussain, J. Distribution of the anti-inflammatory and anti-depressant compounds: Incensole and incensole acetate in genus Boswellia. Phytochemistry 2019, 161, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Herrmann, A.; Lechtenberg, M.; Hensel, A. Comparative isolation and structural investigations of polysaccharides from Boswellia serrata ROXB. and Boswellia carteri BIRDW. Planta Med. 2007, 73, YRW_003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Unioni, E. European Union Register of Feed Additives pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Annex I: List of additives. Europea n Union, Luxembourg: Verkossa. 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/animal-feed-eureg-comm_register_feed_additives_1831-03.pdf (accessed on 11 December 2017).
  22. Schrott, E.; Laufer, S.; Lammerhofer, M.; Ammon, H. Extract from gum resin of Boswellia serrata decreases [IA. sub. 2]-antibody in a patient with ”Late onset Autoimmune Diabetes of the Adult”(LADA). Phytomed. Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 2014, 21, 786–787. [Google Scholar]
  23. Siddiqui, M. Boswellia serrata, a potential anti-inflammatory agent: An overview. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 73, 255. [Google Scholar]
  24. Umar, S.; Umar, K.; Sarwar, A.H.M.G.; Khan, A.; Ahmad, N.; Ahmad, S.; Katiyar, C.K.; Husain, S.A.; Khan, H.A. Boswellia serrata extract attenuates inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress in collagen induced arthritis. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, W.; Entschladen, F.; Liu, H.; Niggemann, B.; Fang, Q.; Zaenker, K.S.; Han, R. Boswellic acid acetate induces differentiation and apoptosis in highly metastatic melanoma and fibrosarcoma cells. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2003, 27, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. CCAC. Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines on: The Care and Use of Fish in Research, Teaching and Testing; Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  27. Water Environment Federation; American Public Health Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  28. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  30. El-Telbany, M.; Atallah, S. Some culture factors affecting the productive and economic efficiency of Mugil capito nursing in earthen pond system 9th Scientific Cingrees. Fac Vet. Med. Assiut Univ. 2000, 46, 19–20. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dunning, R.; Daniels, H. Hybrid Striped Bass Production in Ponds: Enterprise Budget; Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  32. Adeshina, I.; Jenyo-Oni, A.; Emikpe, B. Use of eugenia cayrophyllata oil as anaesthetic in farm raised african catfish clarias gariepinus juveniles. Egypt. J. Exp. Biol. (Zool.) 2016, 12, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  33. Allain, C.C.; Poon, L.S.; Chan, C.S.; Richmond, W.; Fu, P.C. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin. Chem. 1974, 20, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McGowan, M.; Artiss, J.D.; Strandbergh, D.R.; Zak, B. A peroxidase-coupled method for the colorimetric determination of serum triglycerides. Clin. Chem. 1983, 29, 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Trinder, P. Determination of blood glucose using 4-amino phenazone as oxygen acceptor. J. Clin. Pathol. 1969, 22, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kaplan, A.; Savory, J. Evaluation of a cellulose-acetate electrophoresis system for serum protein fractionation. Clin. Chem. 1965, 11, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nishikimi, M.; Rao, N.A.; Yagi, K. The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1972, 46, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. In Methods in Enzymology; Packer, L., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984; Volume 105, pp. 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  39. Beutler, E. Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1963, 61, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Grinde, B. Lysozyme from rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson, as an antibacterial agent against fish pathogens. J. Fish Dis. 1989, 12, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Quade, M.J.; Roth, J.A. A rapid, direct assay to measure degranulation of bovine neutrophil primary granules. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1997, 58, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moshage, H. Simple and reliable measurement of nitric oxide metabolites in plasma. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55, 1881–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Suvarna, S.; Layton, C.; Bancroft, J. The Hematoxylins and Eosin. Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 7th ed.; Churchill Livingstone: London, UK, 2013; pp. 172–186. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pirarat, N.; Pinpimai, K.; Endo, M.; Katagiri, T.; Ponpornpisit, A.; Chansue, N.; Maita, M. Modulation of intestinal morphology and immunity in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 91, e92–e97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, F.; Song, W.; Shao, Q.; Peng, X.; Xiao, J.; Hua, Y.; Owari, B.N.; Zhang, T.; Ng, W.K. Partial replacement of fish meal by fermented soybean meal in diets for black sea bream, Acanthopagrus schlegelii, juveniles. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2011, 42, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Scheidegger, E.; Fracalanzza, S.; Teixeira, L.; Cardarelli-Leite, P. RFLP analysis of a PCR-amplified fragment of the 16S rRNA gene as a tool to identify Enterococcus strains. Memórias Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2009, 104, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Amend, D.F. Potency testing of fish vaccines. In Fish Biologics: Serodiagnostics and Vaccines; Karger: Berlin, Germany, 1981; pp. 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  48. Aman, M.; Ravishankar Rai, V.; Samaga, P.V. Antimicrobial and Phytochemical Screening of Boswellia serrata Roxb., Rhus mysorensis Heyne, Strychnos potatorum Linn. F. and Schefflera stellata Gaertn. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 4, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
  49. Raja, A.F.; Ali, F.; Khan, I.A.; Shawl, A.S.; Arora, D.S. Acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA); targeting oral cavity pathogens. Bmc Res. Notes 2011, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Amer, S.A.; Osman, A.; Al-Gabri, N.A.; Elsayed, S.A.; El-Rahman, A.; Ghada, I.; Elabbasy, M.T.; Ahmed, S.A.; Ibrahim, R.E. The Effect of Dietary Replacement of Fish Meal with Whey Protein Concentrate on the Growth Performance, Fish Health, and Immune Status of Nile Tilapia Fingerlings, Oreochromis niloticus. Animals 2019, 9, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Pirarat, N.; Boonananthanasarn, S.; Krongpong, L.; Katagiri, T.; Maita, M. Effect of activated charcoal-supplemented diet on growth performance and intestinal morphology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Thai J. Vet. Med. 2015, 45, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lauriano, E.; Pergolizzi, S.; Capillo, G.; Kuciel, M.; Alesci, A.; Faggio, C. Immunohistochemical characterization of Toll-like receptor 2 in gut epithelial cells and macrophages of goldfish Carassius auratus fed with a high-cholesterol diet. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 59, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caspary, W.F. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992, 55, 299S–308S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gabriel, N.N.; Qiang, J.; He, J.; Ma, X.Y.; Kpundeh, M.D.; Xu, P. Dietary Aloe vera supplementation on growth performance, some haemato-biochemical parameters and disease resistance against Streptococcus iniae in tilapia (GIFT). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 44, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mukherjee, D.; Ghosal, I.; Moniruzzaman, M.; De, M.; Chakraborty, S.B. Dietary Administration of Ethanol and Methanol Extracts of Withania somnifera Root Stimulates Innate Immunity, Physiological Parameters and Growth in Nile Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus. Croat. J. Fish. 2019, 77, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wang, X.; Liu, R.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Liao, N.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Qin, X.; Hai, C. Oleanolic acid improves hepatic insulin resistance via antioxidant, hypolipidemic and anti-inflammatory effects. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013, 376, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Qurishi, Y.; Hamid, A.; Zargar, M.; Singh, S.K.; Saxena, A.K. Potential role of natural molecules in health and disease: Importance of boswellic acid. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 2778–2786. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jadhav, R.; Puchchakayala, G. Hypoglycemic and antidiabetic activity of flavonoids: Boswellic acid, ellagic acid, quercetin, rutin on streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced type 2 diabetic rats. Group 2012, 1, 100g. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yunoki, K.; Sasaki, G.; Tokuji, Y.; Kinoshita, M.; Naito, A.; Aida, K.; Ohnishi, M. Effect of dietary wine pomace extract and oleanolic acid on plasma lipids in rats fed high-fat diet and its DNA microarray analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 12052–12058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fazio, F.; Saoca, C.; Casella, S.; Fortino, G.; Piccione, G. Relationship between blood parameters and biometric indices of Sparus aurata and Dicentrarcus labrax cultured in onshore tanks. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2015, 48, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fazio, F. Fish hematology analysis as an important tool of aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture 2019, 500, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Polakof, S.; Panserat, S.; Soengas, J.L.; Moon, T.W. Glucose metabolism in fish: A review. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2012, 182, 1015–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sousa, A.A.; Lopes, D.L.; Emerenciano, M.G.; Nora, L.; Souza, C.F.; Baldissera, M.D.; Baldisserotto, B.; Alba, D.F.; Da Silva, A.S. Phosphatidylcholine in diets of juvenile Nile tilapia in a biofloc technology system: Effects on performance, energy metabolism and the antioxidant system. Aquaculture 2020, 515, 734574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Castellano, J.M.; Guinda, A.; Delgado, T.; Rada, M.; Cayuela, J.A. Biochemical basis of the antidiabetic activity of oleanolic acid and related pentacyclic triterpenes. Diabetes 2013, 62, 1791–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Liu, J. Pharmacology of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1995, 49, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, J. Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid: Research perspectives. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 100, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kew, M.C. Serum aminotransferase concentration as evidence of hepatocellular damage. Lancet 2000, 355, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cocchetto, D.M.; Tschanz, C.; Bjornsson, T.D. Decreased rate of creatinine production in patients with hepatic disease: Implications for estimation of creatinine clearance. Ther. Drug Monit. 1983, 5, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Alexander, C.; Sahu, N.; Pal, A.; Akhtar, M. Haemato-immunological and stress responses of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) fingerlings: Effect of rearing temperature and dietary gelatinized carbohydrate. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 95, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Holderness, J.; Schepetkin, I.A.; Freedman, B.; Kirpotina, L.N.; Quinn, M.T.; Hedges, J.F.; Jutila, M.A. Polysaccharides isolated from Acai fruit induce innate immune responses. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Den Haan, J.M.; Kraal, G. Innate immune functions of macrophage subpopulations in the spleen. J. Innate Immun. 2012, 4, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ringø, E.; Myklebust, R.; Mayhew, T.M.; Olsen, R.E. Bacterial translocation and pathogenesis in the digestive tract of larvae and fry. Aquaculture 2007, 268, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ringø, E.; Løvmo, L.; Kristiansen, M.; Bakken, Y.; Salinas, I.; Myklebust, R.; Olsen, R.E.; Mayhew, T.M. Lactic acid bacteria vs. pathogens in the gastrointestinal tract of fish: A review. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 451–467. [Google Scholar]
  74. El-Asely, A.; Amin, R.; El-Habashi, N. Effect of dietary administration of Echinacea purpurea on immune responses, histopathological alteration and microbial safety in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. In Proceedings of the 5th Global Fisheries and Aquaculture Research Conference, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, 1–3 October 2012; pp. 100–114. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ledic-Neto, J.; Dotta, G.; Garcia, P.; Brum, A.; Gonçalves, E.L.T.; Martins, M.L. Haematology and melanoma crophage centers of Nile tilapia fed supplemented diet with propolis. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 2014, 36, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Brum, A.; Pereira, S.A.; Cardoso, L.; Chagas, E.C.; Chaves, F.C.M.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Martins, M.L. Blood biochemical parameters and melanomacrophage centers in Nile tilapia fed essential oils of clove basil and ginger. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 74, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Velasco, L.A.; Barros, J. Experimental larval culture of the Caribbean scallops Argopecten nucleus and Nodipecten Nodosus. Aquac. Res. 2008, 39, 603–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Engstad, R.E.; Robertsen, B.; Frivold, E. Yeast glucan induces increase in lysozyme and complement-mediated haemolytic activity in Atlantic salmon blood. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 1992, 2, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pratheepa, V.; Sukumaran, N. Effect of Euphorbia hirta plant leaf extract on immunostimulant response of Aeromonas hydrophila infected Cyprinus carpio. Peer J. 2014, 2, e671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Das, A.; Nakhro, K.; Chowdhury, S.; Kamilya, D. Effects of potential probiotic Bacillus amyloliquifaciens FPTB16 on systemic and cutaneous mucosal immune responses and disease resistance of catla (Catla catla). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kurian, A.; Van Doan, H.; Tapingkae, W.; Elumalai, P. Modulation of mucosal parameters, innate immunity, growth and resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae by enrichment of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diet with Leucas aspera. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 97, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gaafar, A.; Soliman, M.; Ellakany, H.; Affr, N.; Elbialy, A.; Mona, S.Z.; Younes, A.; Abozahra, R. Comparative pathogenecity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Tilapia zilli. Life Sci. J. 2015, 12, 186–194. [Google Scholar]
  83. Grema, H.A.; Geidam, Y.A.; Gadzama, G.B.; Ameh, J.A.; Suleiman, A. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): A review. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015, 3, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Atyah, M.; Zamri-Saad, M.; Siti-Zahrah, A. First report of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from cage-cultured tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 144, 502–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Soliman, M.; Ellakany, H.; Gaafar, A.; Elbialy, A.; Zaki, M.; Younes, A. Epidemiology and antimicrobial activity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) during an outbreak in Egypt. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar]
  86. Raphael, T.; Kuttan, G. Effect of naturally occurring triterpenoids glycyrrhizic acid, ursolic acid, oleanolic acid and nomilin on the immune system. Phytomedicine 2003, 10, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Morikawa, T.; Abdel-Halim, O.B.; Matsuda, H.; Ando, S.; Muraoka, O.; Yoshikawa, M. Pseudoguaiane-type sesquiterpenes and inhibitors on nitric oxide production from Dichrocephala integrifolia. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 6435–6442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Matsuda, H.; Morikawa, T.; Sakamoto, Y. Antiinflammatory principles and three new labdane-type diterpenes, hedychilactones A, B, and C, from the rhizome of Hedychium coronarium Koeng. Heterocycles 2002, 56, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Matsuda, H.; Morikawa, T.; Sakamoto, Y.; Toguchida, I.; Yoshikawa, M. Labdane-type diterpenes with inhibitory effects on increase in vascular permeability and nitric oxide production from Hedychium coronarium. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 2527–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Matsuda, H.; Morikawa, T.; Ando, S.; Oominami, H.; Murakami, T.; Kimura, I.; Yoshikawa, M. Absolute stereostructures of polypodane-and octanordammarane-type triterpenes with nitric oxide production inhibitory activity from guggul-gum resins. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 3037–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yoshikawa, M.; Morikawa, T.; Oominami, H.; Matsuda, H. Absolute stereostructures of olibanumols A, B, C, H, I, and J from olibanum, gum-resin of Boswellia carterii, and inhibitors of nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-activated mouse peritoneal macrophages. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 57, 957–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Ameur, W.B.; de Lapuente, J.; El Megdiche, Y.; Barhoumi, B.; Trabelsi, S.; Camps, L.; Serret, J.; Ramos-López, D.; Gonzalez-Linares, J.; Driss, M.R. Oxidative stress, genotoxicity and histopathology biomarker responses in mullet (Mugil cephalus) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) liver from Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ray, P.D.; Huang, B.-W.; Tsuji, Y. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell. Signal. 2012, 24, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Radi, A.; Matkovics, B. Effects of metal ions on the antioxidant enzyme activities, protein contents and lipid peroxidation of carp tissues. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Comp. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1988, 90, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Martínez-Álvarez, R.M.; Morales, A.E.; Sanz, A. Antioxidant defenses in fish: Biotic and abiotic factors. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2005, 15, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ding, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Wen, A. Posttreatment with 11-keto-β-boswellic acid ameliorates cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury: Nrf2/HO-1 pathway as a potential mechanism. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 52, 1430–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Assimopoulou, A.; Zlatanos, S.; Papageorgiou, V. Antioxidant activity of natural resins and bioactive triterpenes in oil substrates. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ebrahimpour, S.; Fazeli, M.; Mehri, S.; Taherianfard, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Boswellic acid improves cognitive function in a rat model through its antioxidant activity: Neuroprotective effect of boswellic acid. J. Pharmacopunct. 2017, 20, 10. [Google Scholar]
  99. Sharma, A.; Upadhyay, J.; Jain, A.; Kharya, M.; Namdeo, A.; Mahadik, K. Antioxidant activity of aqueous extract of Boswellia serrata. J. Chem. Bio. Phys. Sci. 2011, 1, 60–71. [Google Scholar]
  100. Afsar, V.; Reddy, Y.M.; Saritha, K. In vitro antioxidant activity and anti-inflammatory activity of methanolic leaf extract of Boswellia serrata. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. Pharm. Res. 2012, 4, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (A) Chromatographic characteristics by GC-mass techniques showing the active principles in Boswellia serrata resin extract (BSRE). (B) Diterpenes (Incensole, C20H34O2) with an area of 19.97%; (C) methyl Commate A (boswellic acids, C32H52O4); (D) methyl Commate B (Oleanolic acid, C31H50O3); (E) methyl Commate C (Sulfurenic acid, C31H50O4) with an area of 15.95, 15.95 and 13.63 %, respectively.
Figure 1. (A) Chromatographic characteristics by GC-mass techniques showing the active principles in Boswellia serrata resin extract (BSRE). (B) Diterpenes (Incensole, C20H34O2) with an area of 19.97%; (C) methyl Commate A (boswellic acids, C32H52O4); (D) methyl Commate B (Oleanolic acid, C31H50O3); (E) methyl Commate C (Sulfurenic acid, C31H50O4) with an area of 15.95, 15.95 and 13.63 %, respectively.
Animals 11 00446 g001
Figure 2. The effect of BSRE dietary addition on the economic value of the diets. Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). The data were expressed as the mean± standard error (SE). a, b Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The effect of BSRE dietary addition on the economic value of the diets. Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). The data were expressed as the mean± standard error (SE). a, b Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Animals 11 00446 g002
Figure 3. Photomicrograph from gills the control group (A) showing normal primary (black arrow) and secondary gill filaments with normal pavement cells, (blue arrow) Scale bars, 20 μm. (B) photomicrograph from the gills of the BSRE5 group, showing tips of a few filaments with epithelial lifting (yellow arrow) and stromal lymphocytic infiltration, Scale bars 50 μm. (C) photomicrographs from the gills of the BSRE10 group showing congested, Telangiectatic capillaries (green arrow), focal denudation of the secondary filament structures (blue arrow), lymphocytic infiltration (red arrow). Scale bars, 40 μm. (D) photomicrographs from the gills of the BSRE15 group showing that the tips of some filaments appear focally denuded, fused, thick, and enlarged by severely congested capillaries (green arrow), epithelial proliferation, goblet cell proliferation, and lymphocytic infiltration (red arrow).
Figure 3. Photomicrograph from gills the control group (A) showing normal primary (black arrow) and secondary gill filaments with normal pavement cells, (blue arrow) Scale bars, 20 μm. (B) photomicrograph from the gills of the BSRE5 group, showing tips of a few filaments with epithelial lifting (yellow arrow) and stromal lymphocytic infiltration, Scale bars 50 μm. (C) photomicrographs from the gills of the BSRE10 group showing congested, Telangiectatic capillaries (green arrow), focal denudation of the secondary filament structures (blue arrow), lymphocytic infiltration (red arrow). Scale bars, 40 μm. (D) photomicrographs from the gills of the BSRE15 group showing that the tips of some filaments appear focally denuded, fused, thick, and enlarged by severely congested capillaries (green arrow), epithelial proliferation, goblet cell proliferation, and lymphocytic infiltration (red arrow).
Animals 11 00446 g003
Figure 4. Photomicrograph from the posterior intestine of the control group (A) showing that the villi are broad and short, the crypts are deeper, the mucosal epithelial lining is free of cilia and contains more goblet cells. The mucosa shows a single epithelial layer of columnar cells, followed by the lamina propria and ill-distinct muscularis mucosa. The submucosa shows loose CT, reticular and elastic fibers beside some adipocytes. It encloses blood vessels and lymphatics. A thin mesothelial layer encoded the outermost muscle layer (serosa) Scale bars, 100 μm. (BD) photo-micrographs from the posterior intestine of BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 groups shows nearly similar histomorphology as that of the control group, however, a mild to a moderate number of lymphocytes are seen infiltrating the lamina epithelialis, which is most prominent in the BSRE10 group (yellow arrows) Scale bars 50, 40 μm.
Figure 4. Photomicrograph from the posterior intestine of the control group (A) showing that the villi are broad and short, the crypts are deeper, the mucosal epithelial lining is free of cilia and contains more goblet cells. The mucosa shows a single epithelial layer of columnar cells, followed by the lamina propria and ill-distinct muscularis mucosa. The submucosa shows loose CT, reticular and elastic fibers beside some adipocytes. It encloses blood vessels and lymphatics. A thin mesothelial layer encoded the outermost muscle layer (serosa) Scale bars, 100 μm. (BD) photo-micrographs from the posterior intestine of BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 groups shows nearly similar histomorphology as that of the control group, however, a mild to a moderate number of lymphocytes are seen infiltrating the lamina epithelialis, which is most prominent in the BSRE10 group (yellow arrows) Scale bars 50, 40 μm.
Animals 11 00446 g004
Figure 5. Photomicrographs from the kidney of the control group (A) showed normal renal glomerular, tubular, and interstitial structures with preserved Bowman’s capsular histomorphology, glomerular capillary morphology (red arrows), and tubular epithelial length and widths, minimal degenerative changes in a few numbers of renal tubules were seen (yellow arrows), Scale bar, 20 μm. (BD) Photomicrographs from the kidney of BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 groups, respectively, showed comparatively healthy, normal counterparts of the nephron units with a slandered morphological appearance, which is homologous to the control one in BSRE5 group (blue arrows and yellow stars) and less standardized in BSRE10 and BSRE15 groups, where some of the renal tubules suffered degenerative changes, mostly of hydropic type ((C), blue arrows), ((D), yellow arrows), Scale bar, 20 μm.
Figure 5. Photomicrographs from the kidney of the control group (A) showed normal renal glomerular, tubular, and interstitial structures with preserved Bowman’s capsular histomorphology, glomerular capillary morphology (red arrows), and tubular epithelial length and widths, minimal degenerative changes in a few numbers of renal tubules were seen (yellow arrows), Scale bar, 20 μm. (BD) Photomicrographs from the kidney of BSRE5, BSRE10, and BSRE15 groups, respectively, showed comparatively healthy, normal counterparts of the nephron units with a slandered morphological appearance, which is homologous to the control one in BSRE5 group (blue arrows and yellow stars) and less standardized in BSRE10 and BSRE15 groups, where some of the renal tubules suffered degenerative changes, mostly of hydropic type ((C), blue arrows), ((D), yellow arrows), Scale bar, 20 μm.
Animals 11 00446 g005
Figure 6. Photomicrographs from the spleen of the control group (A) showed characteristic proliferative aggregations of melano-macrophages, both perivascular and interstitial (blue arrow). The blood vessels and the splenic sinusoids were mild to moderately congested, and the latter occupied a large area of the tissue constituting the red pulp of the spleen (black arrow). Splenic cords are a mesh of fibroblast-like cells with foci of various blood cells. White pulp, consisting mainly of lymphoid cells, typically surrounds arterial vessels, assuming a nodular pattern (yellow arrows), scale bar; 50 μm. (BD) photomicrographs from the spleen of BSRE5, BSRE10 and BSRE15 showed histomorphological structures comparable to the control group. The lymphoid elements appear more prevalent, particularly around the small size blood vessels forming aggregations or ill distinct nodular arrangement (yellow and blue arrows). The splenic cords were outstanding, especially in the BSRE10 group ((C), red arrows). Melano-macrophage centers (MMC) are mild to moderately activated ((B), red stars). Scale bars 50 μm.
Figure 6. Photomicrographs from the spleen of the control group (A) showed characteristic proliferative aggregations of melano-macrophages, both perivascular and interstitial (blue arrow). The blood vessels and the splenic sinusoids were mild to moderately congested, and the latter occupied a large area of the tissue constituting the red pulp of the spleen (black arrow). Splenic cords are a mesh of fibroblast-like cells with foci of various blood cells. White pulp, consisting mainly of lymphoid cells, typically surrounds arterial vessels, assuming a nodular pattern (yellow arrows), scale bar; 50 μm. (BD) photomicrographs from the spleen of BSRE5, BSRE10 and BSRE15 showed histomorphological structures comparable to the control group. The lymphoid elements appear more prevalent, particularly around the small size blood vessels forming aggregations or ill distinct nodular arrangement (yellow and blue arrows). The splenic cords were outstanding, especially in the BSRE10 group ((C), red arrows). Melano-macrophage centers (MMC) are mild to moderately activated ((B), red stars). Scale bars 50 μm.
Animals 11 00446 g006
Table 1. Feed formulation and proximate composition (g kg−1 on a dry weight basis).
Table 1. Feed formulation and proximate composition (g kg−1 on a dry weight basis).
Ingredientsg kg−1
Soybean meal 49% CP319.4
Fish meal 70.7% CP150
Yellow corn157.1
Corn gluten 67% CP100
Wheat flour100
Wheat bran80
Fish oil60
Methionine3.5
Premix 130
Chemical composition (g kg−1)
Crude protein374.76
Crude fiber40.59
Fat94.74
NFE 2427.53
Ash62.35
Lysine20.321
Methionine10.88
GE MJ/kg 320.70
1 Composition of vitamins and minerals premix kg−1: vitamin A580,000 IU; vitamin D3 8600 IU; vitamin K3 142 mg; vitamin E 720 mg; vitamin C 0.1 mg; vitamin B1 58 mg; vitamin B2 34 mg; vitamin B6 34 mg; vitamin B12 58 mg; folic acid 86 mg; biotin 50 mg; pantothenic acid 8 mg; zinc methionine 3000 mg; manganese sulfate 65 mg; copper sulfate 3400 mg; iron sulfate 2000 mg; sodium selenite 25 mg; cobalt sulfate 572 mg; calcium iodide 25 mg; calcium carbonate as carrier up to till 1 kg. 2 Nitrogen free extract, determined by difference = 100 − (protein % + fat % + crude fiber % + ash %). 3 Gross energy (GE) was calculated according to NRC (2011) as 23.6 KJ/g protein, 39.5 KJ/g lipid and 17.0 KJ/g NFE.
Table 2. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the growth performance of O. niloticus.
Table 2. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the growth performance of O. niloticus.
ParametersBSRE0BSRE5BSRE10BSRE15SEMRegression Analysis #
LinearQuadratic
IBW/fish (g)22.3821.7122.3220.850.480.720.49
FBW/fish (g)55.72 b60.71 a56.45 b54.96 b0.760.120.005
TBWG/fish(g)33.34 b39.00 a34.13 b34.10 b0.780.540.01
ADFI/ fish (g)0.74 b0.85 a0.80 ab0.75 b0.010.940.002
Total FI/fish (g)41.68 b48.00 a45.28 ab42.47 b0.870.940.002
FCR1.251.231.321.240.020.730.54
PER2.132.162.012.140.030.690.52
PPE0.98 b1.43 a1.28 a1.33 a0.050.0010.001
# The regressions were considered significant at p < 0.05. IBW, Initial body weight; FBW, Final body weight; TBWG, Total bodyweight gain; FI, feed intake; FCR, Feed conversion ratio; PER, Protein efficiency ratio; PPE, Protein productive effi-ciency. Variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM; Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). a, b Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Table 3. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the proximate whole-fish body composition of O. niloticus.
Table 3. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the proximate whole-fish body composition of O. niloticus.
ParametersInitialBSRE0BSRE5BSRE10BSRE15SEMRegression Analysis #
LinearQuadratic
DM% *20.55 24.1327.4525.0527.170.570.060.37
Crude protein % **54.8345.58 d65.92 a63.68 b61.86 c2.420.000.00
Crude lipids % **18.6436.39 a18.50 b17.09 b13.38 c2.690.000.00
Ash% **22.3615.35 bc13.89 c16.96 b21.03 a0.830.000.001
# The regressions were considered significant at p < 0.05. Variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM; Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). * On fresh basis, ** on dry matter basis. a,b,c,d Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Table 4. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the blood biochemical parameters of O. niloticus.
Table 4. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the blood biochemical parameters of O. niloticus.
ParametersBSRE0BSRE5BSRE10BSRE15SEMRegression Analysis #
LinearQuadratic
Triglycerides (mg dL−1)324.50 a255.00 b209.00 c160.50 d18.220.000.00
Cholesterol (mg dL−1)220.50 a213.66 b206.50 c168.50 d6.070.000.00
Glucose (mg dL−1)71.00 a 68.30 b 62.65 c 61.65 c1.190.010.00
Total protein (g dL−1)6.10 d7.70 c8.35 b8.90 a0.320.000.001
Albumin (g dL−1)2.00 b2.35 ab2.40 ab 2.55 a0.070.0080.02
Total globulin (g dL−1)4.90 c5.35 bc5.80 b6.50 a0.180.000.40
α1 globulin (g dL−1)1.10 b1.27 a1.32 a1.35 a0.030.0010.06
α2 globulin (g dL−1)1.30 d1.52 c1.67 b1.78 a0.050.000.003
ß globulin (g dL−1)1.10 c1.12 bc1.30 ab1.35 a0.030.0020.78
ɣ globulin (g dL−1)0.95 c1.40 b1.90 a2.10 a0.130.000.04
ALT23.00 b18.70 c21.65 b31.45 a0.010.000.00
Creatinine0.11 a0.10 a0.10 a0.07 b0.0050.000.10
# The regressions were considered significant at p < 0.05. Variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM; Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). a,b,c,d Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Table 5. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the antioxidant and immune status of O. niloticus.
Table 5. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the antioxidant and immune status of O. niloticus.
ParametersBSRE0BSRE5BSRE10BSRE15SEMRegression Analysis #
LinearQuadratic
Antioxidant capacity
SOD (U L−1)3.77 d4.77 c6.36 b7.08 a0.390.000.39
CAT (U L−1)124.00 d162.50 c190.00 b201.50 a9.010.000.00
GSH (mmol L−1)2.67 b3.05 b3.75 a3.78 a0.140.000.11
Immunological indices
Lysozyme (µg mL−1)4.61 c5.23 b 6.42 a6.41 a0.230.000.00
MPO (U L−1)18.50 d26.40 c30.10 b36.65 a1.990.000.00
NO (µmol L−1)79.50 a 40.50 b 31.50 c29.00 d6.120.000.00
# The regressions were considered significant at p < 0.05. Variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM; Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). CAT: catalase, SOD: superoxide dismutase, GSH: reduced glutathione, NO: nitric oxide, MPO: myeloperoxidase. a,b,c,d Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Table 6. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the morphometric measures of the intestine of O. niloticus.
Table 6. The effects of dietary Boswellia serrate resin extract (BSRE) on the morphometric measures of the intestine of O. niloticus.
ParametersBSRE0BSRE5BSRE10BSRE15SEMRegression Analysis #
LinearQuadratic
Villous height (µm)583.94 b709.31 a546.61 c418.88 d31.440.000.00
Villous width (µm)208.25 d212.46 c232.32 b390.47 a22.710.000.00
Mucosal thickness (µm)143.27 c266.63 a162.57 b140.09 d15.600.000.00
Goblet cell count2.333.661.662.660.260.520.63
IELI34.00 b17.00 c79.00 a37.33 b6.880.000.00
# The regressions were considered significant at p < 0.05. Variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM; Mean values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). IELI: intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltration. a,b,c,d Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montaser, M.M.; El-sharnouby, M.E.; EL-Noubi, G.; El-Shaer, H.M.; Khalil, A.A.; Hassanin, M.; Amer, S.A.; El-Araby, D.A. Boswellia serrata Resin Extract in Diets of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Effects on the Growth, Health, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance to Staphylococcus aureus. Animals 2021, 11, 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020446

AMA Style

Montaser MM, El-sharnouby ME, EL-Noubi G, El-Shaer HM, Khalil AA, Hassanin M, Amer SA, El-Araby DA. Boswellia serrata Resin Extract in Diets of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Effects on the Growth, Health, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance to Staphylococcus aureus. Animals. 2021; 11(2):446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montaser, Metwally M., Mohamed E. El-sharnouby, Gamal EL-Noubi, Heba M. El-Shaer, Alshimaa A. Khalil, Mohamed Hassanin, Shimaa A. Amer, and Doaa A. El-Araby. 2021. "Boswellia serrata Resin Extract in Diets of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Effects on the Growth, Health, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance to Staphylococcus aureus" Animals 11, no. 2: 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop