Next Article in Journal
Maxillary Incisors of the Horse before and at the Beginning of the Teeth Shedding: Radiographic and CT Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Optimal Combination of Dietary Starch, Non-Starch Polysaccharides, and Mannan-Oligosaccharide Increases the Growth Performance and Improves Butyrate-Producing Bacteria of Weaned Pigs
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of RNA Editing Sites Affecting Intramuscular Fat in Pigs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Food Production and Nutraceutical Applications from Qatar Desert Chlorella sp. (Chlorophyceae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/ani10091617
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasites and Productive Parameters on Sheep Fed on a Ration Supplemented with Guazuma ulmifolia Leaves in Southern Mexico

by
Emelyne Le Bodo
1,
Jean-Luc Hornick
1,2,*,
Nassim Moula
2,
Serrano Aracely Zuñiga
3 and
Juan Carlos Martínez-Alfaro
4
1
Department of Animal Resources Management and Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Quartier Vallée 2, Avenue de Cureghem 6, B43a, 4000 Liège, Belgium
2
Department of Animal Resources Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, FARAH Center, Quartier Vallée 2, Avenue de Cureghem 6, B43a, 4000 Liège, Belgium
3
Department of Salubridad e Higiene, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Torreón 27054, Mexico
4
Department of Ciencias Médico Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Torreón 27054, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(9), 1617; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091617
Submission received: 22 July 2020 / Revised: 1 September 2020 / Accepted: 3 September 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Animal Nutrition and Feeding)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Gastrointestinal (GI) parasite infections represent a serious problem in small ruminant production. This issue is currently potentiated by anthelmintic resistance. Thus, the need for more sustainable control alternatives has increased during recent decades. The use of bioactive forages with condensed tannins (CTs) has shown encouraging results. The local Mexican plant Guazuma ulmifolia is cited in ethnoveterinary studies and naturally selected by sheep (Pelibuey breed). G. ulmifolia contains a certain amount of CTs. Therefore, this study aimed at evaluating the impact of G. ulmifolia in sheep diet on animal performance and GI parasites eggs/oocysts excretion. Twenty-two sheep were randomly distributed into two groups: a control group without G. ulmifolia and a test group receiving a diet which contained G. ulmifolia fresh foliage at 30% of the total diet dry matter. For 30 days, weight, body condition, and GI parasite load were assessed. The results showed no significant anthelmintic and anticoccidial effects (p > 0.05) as well as inconsistent impact on live weight during the 30-days experiment. Nevertheless, considering the bromatological analysis of G. ulmifolia, its use as a diet supplement to adjust protein and calcium deficits of poor-quality forage is justified.

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the impact of a diet supplemented with Guazuma ulmifolia leaves on the productive performance and gastrointestinal parasites (GI) eggs/oocysts shedding of sheep (Pelibuey breed). Twenty-two non-lactating ewes were used. They were randomly allocated to two similar groups in terms of age, weight, body condition score (BCS), and GI parasites status. For 30 days, while the control group (G0) was given basic forage hay of Cynodon nlemfuensis, the test group (G1) received a blend of G. ulmifolia fresh foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (respectively 30 and 70% of the diet on a DM basis). Animals were housed in separate covered pens. Quantitative coprological analysis was performed. Weight and BCS were evaluated. The daily feed amounts given and refused were measured in order to assess nutrient components intake (minerals, energy, and nitrogen). The results showed no significant differences between G1 and G0 regarding the anthelmintic and anticoccidial effects (p = 0.57, p = 0.91, respectively). Similarly, no significant overall impact on weight and BCS during the experiment (p = 0.77, p = 0.32, respectively) was observed. Nevertheless, concerning the bromatological analysis of G. ulmifolia, its use as a diet supplement to address protein and mineral deficits due to a poor-quality diet is fully justified.

1. Introduction

In Mexico, sheep, together with goats and other domestic species, have been raised for five centuries. However, ovine production has increased in recent years, due to the growing demand for meat. Currently, sheep farming contributes significantly to the rural economy of the country, especially in central Mexico for the preparation of traditional dishes. In addition to the high profitability of the species, sheep are prolific ruminants that adapt easily to various environments and make adequate use of resources available in the different regions of the country [1].
In southwestern Mexico, livestock is managed extensively and greatly promoted by government institutions. Thereby, the vegetation was strongly impacted and the original landscape modified, in which corn crop fields were replaced by pastures [2]. It has been documented that trees dispersed in pastures or as a live fence perform multiple functions in production units [2]. For example, tree and shrub foliage with forage potential are considered as an indirect alternative feed in the diet of ruminants, mainly in the time of forage shortage. This alternative aroused some researchers’ interest [3,4,5,6].
In previous studies, the area’s producers were surveyed, allowing for identification of the most locally used tree and shrub species with forage potential [5,6]. In addition to this, studies on sheep ingestive feeding behavior related to tropical trees and their forage potential were conducted. This highlighted the social importance of the Guazuma ulmifolia tree (Malvaceae) and revealed that both its foliage [3,5,6] and fruits [4] have a significantly higher preference rate in sheep and are valuable from a nutritional point of view.
Endoparasites are one of the major issues in sheep production. Gastrointestinal parasitic infections have a strong impact on health and production of small ruminants. Thus, the generated losses decrease farm productivity. Without proper internal parasites control, fecundity, milk yield, and carcass value suffer and, in severe cases, death may occur [6,7].
In order to restrain this problem, anthelmintics are widely used. Their use has proven to be an effective control solution. However, within recent years, the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance has risen sharply all around the world including Mexico [8,9,10]. Besides, even if new molecules could emerge, resistance would build up quickly [11] and this issue would remain. Thus, more sustainable alternative control strategies are required [6,12]. The use of bioactive forages that contain tannins is part of the sustainable integrated management strategy. Indeed, it was shown that condensed tannins have antiparasitic effects that include anthelmintic [13,14,15] and anticoccidial activity [16,17]. Besides, other studies revealed that CTs also display nutritional benefits due to protection of dietary protein from excessive fermentation in the rumen. These benefits include improved growth, milk yields, and fertility, and increased resilience to some intestinal parasites [18].
Some studies on G. ulmifolia reported CTs concentrations in this tree. Values in foliage varied from 0.23% to 6.5% DM [4,19,20]. However, some investigations reported various phytotherapeutic properties such as anti-diabetic [21,22], hypotensive and vasorelaxant [23,24], antiulcer [25,26], antibacterial [27,28], and antiviral [29] activities. However, only little information on the effects of G. ulmifolia on gastrointestinal (GI) parasites is available in the literature, up to now. Only one study investigated the impact of G. ulmifolia which was included at 10% of the total diet dry matter over Haemonchus contortus in kids [19]. This study, conducted in the state of Guerrero, Mexico, compared G. ulmifolia with two other common tropical tree foliage, Pithecellobium dulce and Acacia cochliacantha. It was concluded that P. dulce and A. cochliacantha, which present higher CTs concentrations, had potential control over H. contortus, contrary to G. ulmifolia.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of high-G. ulmifolia fodder supply in a period of feed shortage on diet characteristics, animal performance (body condition score, corporal weight), and GI parasites in the sheep of southern Mexico.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Environment, Animal, Plant Material, and Experiment

The experimental procedures used in the current experiments were carried out according to the Official Mexican Rule for technical specifications related to the production, care, and use of laboratory animals (NOM-062-Z00-1992, -003-Z00-1994, -051-Z00-1995, -029-ZOO-1995, -033-ZOO-1995) [30]; the protocol number is PYE-01-Protocolo-2019.
The study was conducted in the Sacrosanto Ranch, Municipality of Jiquipilas, Chiapas, located 16°34′20″ LN and 93°30′50″ LW and 610 m above sea level. According to the Köppen Classification, modified by García [31], the climate is Aw1 (i’) g: warm sub-humid with an annual mean temperature >22 °C, little temperature variation (between 5 and 7 °C), the hottest month before the summer solstice (i.e., June), and rains in summer. The typical vegetation consists of a tropical forest with tree species having potential forage of secondary succession such as G. ulmifolia. The presence of the latter is natural in the central region of Chiapas, Mexico. The test was carried out from 9 July to 7 August, 2019, and included only one step, i.e., a 30-day adaptation and measurement.
A total of 22 empty female Pelibuey sheep, 1 to 2 years old, were used. They were randomly allocated to two homogeneous groups in terms of age, body condition (weight, score), and parasitological status as assessed by a McMaster technique [32] (Table 1). The animals were provided with a mineral salt block and water on an ad libitum basis. The control group (G0) was only offered hay of “Estrella of Africa” (Cynodon nlemfuensis) as usually practiced in the region. The test group (G1) received a blend of 30% G. ulmifolia fresh foliage in addition to 70% C. nlemfuensis hay, all together on a DM basis. As the voluntary feed forages intake was not known, a value of 2.1% body weight DM was assumed [33]. Hence, to limit the possible deficiencies in DM requirements, the amount of diet offered was calculated based on the value of 3% body weight DM per day. C. nlemfuensis, as hay, was assumed to contain around 95% of DM and G. ulmifolia, as fresh foliage, 50% of DM. Each group was offered two meals per day. Body condition score (using the Walkden-Brown scoring) [34] and body weight were measured 3 times (on day 0, day 19, and day 29) and individual coprological analyses were done twice before the start of the trail (day 1 and day 2) and every 5 days thereafter. Each group had a 20 m2 area, of which 15 m2 was roofed to protect the animals from environmental conditions such as sun and rain. Linear feeders with 11 wood divisions were available in both groups, which allowed each sheep to have their own space for feed consumption. In addition, in the test group (G1), feeder wood divisions were extended along the whole body length, allowing for a complete separation between each sheep. During consumption of G. ulmifolia foliage, sheep were immobilized ensuring that each one of them consumed their assigned ration. Feed refusal was measured daily: individually after each meal for G. ulmifolia, and by group before offering the morning meal for C. nlemfuensis. Thus, the daily feedstuff intakes were calculated through the difference between the amounts offered and not ingested.

2.2. Sample Collection and Chemical Analyses

Gastrointestinal parasite fecal eggs and oocysts were counted according to a McMaster technique with a sensitivity of 30 EPG [32,35]. Feces were collected in the morning and conserved individually in a cool place with ice. Coprological analyses of samples (30 EPG detection limit), pooled per group, were performed during the day.
Feed analyses were carried out on three samples of each plant collected at different times of the study (end of July, beginning of August, and end of the experiment).
The chemical composition analyses of the feed samples were carried out according to AOAC procedures [36]. Dry matter (DM) content was determined from a 5-g-test sample maintained at a temperature of 105 °C for 24 h [37]. Crude ash was determined from a 1-g-test sample incinerated in an oven at 550 °C for 4 h. Crude protein (CP) was determined by the Kjeldahl method (N × 6.25); crude fiber (CF) by the method of Weende (Method N° 978.10). Fractions of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were determined by following the technique proposed by Van Soest et al. [38]. Finally, major macrominerals such as calcium, potassium, sodium, and magnesium were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Phosphorus was measured by colorimetry. The determination of trace elements—Cu, Fe, Zn, and Mn—was carried out by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
Tannin concentrations were evaluated using a methylcellulose precipitable tannin assay (MCP) for the total tannins [39], and the ethanolysis method for the CTs.

2.3. Calculations and Statistical Analyses

The adequate allocation of animals into groups was verified according to a Student t-test and normality of the variables was assessed. Calculations of forages’ net energy, intestinal digestible protein (IDP), and rumen degradable nitrogen balance (RDNB) were performed according to Institut National de Recherche Agronomique formulas [33].
The substitution rate of G. ulmifolia was calculated according to the following equation:
Substitution   rate = C . n l e m f u e n s i s   intake   GO −   C . n l e m f u e n s i s   intake   G 1   G .   u l m i f o l i a   intake  
For serial data, a mixed model performed with the SAS statistical package was used [40]. Thus, compound symmetry covariance structures were taken into account. Multiples comparisons were performed according to the Tukey test. Polynomial contrasts were performed in order to assess linear or quadratic effects of time on the parameters.

3. Results

3.1. Nutrient Values and Diet-Associated Calculations

The forages’ chemical composition is reported in Table 2. Although crude ash levels were similar between the two forages, G. ulmifolia presented a CP content higher than 15% DM, i.e., more than twice the content found in C. nlemfluensis. Furthermore, levels of different fiber families were lower in G. ulmifolia than in C. nlemfluensis, especially CF: less than 25% DM vs. close to 35% DM. Therefore, DM net energy value was almost 20% higher in G. ulmifolia than in C. nlemfuensis. The calculated IDP was almost doubled in G. ulmifolia when compared to C. nlemfuensis and RDNB shows an excess close to 7% DM in G. ulmifolia, while the value is negative in C. nlemfuensis. G. ulmifolia showed especially large contents of Ca and K (about 19 g/kg DM) and high Cu levels (more than 30 mg/kg DM). Condensed tannins concentration was close to 1% DM for G. ulmifolia.

3.2. Feed Intake and Animal Performance

The average refusal rate for G. ulmifolia was 2.2% of the total weight offered, and it decreased over time, reaching 0.9% at the end of the experiment. By opposition to G1, net energy intake in G0 was slightly lower than the theoretical requirement (Figure 1). This deficit of ingested energy was steeper during the 10 last days of the experiment (average 2254 kJ/day). However, in both groups, IDP intake was higher than the recommended values and largely higher in G1.
In both sheep groups, mineral supplies were adequate and casual deficiency in sodium and zinc was compensated by the mineral salt rock. In G1, with 30% of G. ulmifolia, the ratio Ca/P at 3.6 was higher than the recommended values (i.e., 1.1–2.1) [41].
Owing to medium intake of G. ulmifolia of 213 g DM/day, sheep from G1 were provided on average 0.075 g CT/kg/day.
Considering the shifts in forage intake after G. ulmifolia incorporation in the diet, the substitution rate of C. nlemfuensis was estimated at 53%.
The effects of G.ulmifolia on animal performance (averages on the entire experiment time) are reported in Table 3. No significant differences were observed between G0 and G1 for all the parameters recorded.
The evolution of animals’ BCS and body weight in the course of the experiment is reported in Figure 2 and Figure 3. There were significant effects of time (p < 0.01) and the interaction of treatment × time (p < 0.05) on the first parameter. On day 19, the BCS of the animals from G1 was significantly higher when compared to G0. On day 29, this difference lost its significance, although it kept the same sign numerically.
No significant time effect over weight in general nor differences between the weights of the groups over time were observed, although a trend was noted for the time impact (p < 0.1). A gap between the groups seemed to emerge over time. Indeed, whereas G0 followed a downward slope, the test group appeared to be more stable (Figure 3).

3.3. Quantitative Parasitological Analysis

Coprological analyses allowed to identify three main GI parasites:
  • Gastrointestinal strongyle-“type” eggs: term which includes GI strongyle eggs with morphological similarities, such as, for the most common genus, Haemonchus, Ostertagia, Trichostrongylus, and Cooperia [6];
  • Strongyloides papillosus eggs;
  • Eimeria spp. oocysts.
The effects of G.ulmifolia on parasite counts (averages on the entire experiment time) are reported in Table 3. No significant differences were observed between G0 and G1.
From a dynamic point of view, the number of GI strongyle-“type” EPG showed no significant difference between G0 and G1 at any time (Figure 4). However, the evolution with time revealed a very highly significant linear increase (p < 0.001). The number of Eimeria spp. OPG also showed no significant difference between G0 and G1, at any time. However, a significant linear decrease with time (p < 0.05) was observed (Figure 5). Finally, the eggs counts of S. papillosus (Figure 6) showed no significant difference between G0 and G1 at any time.

4. Discussion

4.1. Nutrient Values and Diet-Associated Calculations

Considering the chemical composition of the two feed resources, G. ulmifolia foliage could be considered as a high-quality forage, with energy levels close to that reported in concentrates and valuable protein levels. Additionally, the rate of substitution concerning hay of C. nlemfuensis, and the great appetence for G. ulmifolia, associated with very low refusal rates, are in agreement with the “concentrate-like” effects of this forage. C. nlemfuensis is considered presently as a medium–poor-quality forage. Noteworthy, G. ulmifolia is a very good source of calcium, with levels higher than those generally observed in leguminous plants. It should be kept in mind that calcium excess could interact with zinc absorption and, to a lesser extent, copper [41,42].
G. ulmifolia foliage supplementation in a poor diet allows meeting metabolizable energy (ME) and digestible protein (MP) requirements for maintenance while sparing forage during the shortage season. Assessment of the more adequate percentage of G. ulmifolia foliage in order to establish energy, IDP, and RDNB equilibrium found it to be 16% of the diet DM. So, in comparison with the present study, sparing use of G. ulmifolia is possible while preserving maintenance performance. Moreover, G. ulmifolia, by contributing to provide a more equilibrated diet at various levels, helps to avoid nutritional deficiencies. This is an important consideration because not only does an appropriate nutritional supply (in terms of degradable energy and protein or minerals) preserve the ruminal flora quality [42,43], it also improves small ruminant resistance against parasites. Thus, sheep in an undernourishment state (protein in particular) are less resilient and resistant to GI parasites [6]. In turn, subclinical parasitism amplifies nutrient requirements. Indeed, in general, due to the greater use of amino acids to mount the immune response and the increased GI tract tissue protein turnover, internal parasitism has an impact on the MP requirement, which seems to be relatively greater than the ME requirement [44,45]. Consequently, the optimum ME/DP dietary ratio is influenced.
In this way, it has been shown that CTs, by binding to dietary protein and reducing rumen proteolysis, increased the proportion of dietary protein in the small intestine and consequently protein absorption [46]. Their benefits are more likely when dietary protein exceeds the requirements, which was the case in this experiment (Figure 1). However, this CTs capacity seemed to be correlated with both the structure of proteins and CTs themselves. Indeed, in recent studies summarized in Mueller-Harvey’s review [18], the mean degree of polymerization length (mDP) of CT (which might be associated with the specific CT type in certain cases) seemed to be correlated with the bioactive effect on proteins. Thus, the only proof of the presence of condensed tannins, even in important proportions, is not sufficient to warrant benefits due to a certain type of CTs.

4.2. Feed Intake, Animal Performance, and Gastrointestinal Parasites

Supplementation with G. ulmifolia showed no significant effect on weight gain. The lack of an adaptation period to the plant, the management of the sheep, and the short evaluation time could partly explain this. Indeed, alongside the experiment time, weight differences between G0 and G1 increased numerically and the percentage of G. ulmifolia refusal decreased (from 7.2% for the first five days to 0.9% for the five last days). An evaluation with a larger study time and an adaptation period might prove the impact of G. ulmifolia on weight, as in the article of Rubio et al. [3]. Moreover, as a consequence of the nutritional issues above-mentioned, GI nematode infection could have a significant impact on the metabolic status of sheep, including weight and BCS. This clinical impact increased alongside parasitic load. In this experiment, the GI strongyle egg shedding increased during the experiment, reaching a level (>1000 EPG) which is considered to be associated with heavy parasite burden and significant effects on health and productivity in sheep [6]. This gradual increase in egg shedding after 15 days of trial could be partly explained by the climate that impacts helminth development. Thus, an infestation could have occurred on the pasture at the start of the rainy season (i.e., from June) before sheep batching. The prepatent period varied between three and five weeks according to the helminth species [47], and a significant consecutive excretion of eggs in feces could have gradually taken place from the second part of the experiment (i.e., mid-July). This increase in both groups could also be explained by the stress induced by allotment in a limited space. Besides, some one-year-old animals, which face greater parasite infections, were part of the groups. In older animals, repeated parasitic exposures allow for the establishment of immunity and thus parasitic resistance. Indeed, after a full year of grazing, most sheep develop a high degree of immunity which regulates the GI helminth number [6,12,48]. Hence, it would have been more appropriate to perform the fecal egg counts individually. This phenomenon should be taken into consideration when comparing results between different literature sources addressing effects of CT on intestinal parasites.
The evaluation of nutritional supplies and intakes such as energy, protein, and minerals suggested no severe deficiency likely to favor parasitological load. However, the high proportion of G. ulmifolia in the diet of G1 in comparison to the study of León-Castro et al. [19] (30% versus 10% DM of the total diet, respectively) led us to expect that a possible effect would emerge. Unfortunately, as well as the previous study, the present supplementation with G. ulmifolia showed no significant antiparasitic effect. When comparing the chemical compositions of G. ulmifolia foliage in both experiments, the concentration of CT was higher in León-Castro et al.’s experiment (4.1% DM versus 1.1% DM of this study) [19]. This difference highlighted the fact, described in the review of Mueller-Harvey et al. [18] that CT concentration varies greatly not only between plant species but between accessions as well. Yet, the variation of CT according to the analysis technique is also noticeable [49]. Nevertheless, the parasitological impact of CT in diet fluctuates according to the CT type (structural composition, ratio procyanidin-type/prodelphinidin-type, mDP) too [18]. Thus, it is not excluded that the lack of significant antiparasitic impact could have been due to an insufficient concentration or to an inadequate structural type of the CTs contained in G. ulmifolia foliage. In addition, the short treatment period probably played a role in this absence of efficiency. Indeed, Cenci et al. [50] did not observe significant effects of a diet containing 3.2 g CT on lamb growth or inconsistent effects of this treatment on various helminth species, after a treatment lasting for 84 day. In our experiment, no effects on sheep were observed with estimated amounts of CT intake close to 2.3 g/day, offered during a lower period. Iqbal et al. [51] also observed inconsistent anthelmintic effects of CT on H. contortus in lambs fed 2 to 3% CT in their diet, with the level of 3% appearing effective only after 60d of the experiment. When considering the effects of CT on coccidiosis, Saratsis et al. [17] reported high variability of results in ewes and lambs offered CT-rich feeds (sainfoin and/or carob pods) for six–eight weeks. Finally, it must be pointed out that CTs are possibly less or not effective on abomasal worm species, as observed by Athanasiadou et al. [52] with a tannin-rich tree extract (Quebracho), offered to sheep during 3 day at 8% w/w. In our experiment, sheep examined were positive for gastrointestinal strongyle eggs at fecal parasitological analysis. However, the identification of these nematodes at the genus/species level is not possible on the basis of the morphological features of their eggs [7].
These considerations suggest that higher amounts of G. ulmifolia could be effective to control certain sheep gastrointestinal parasites in southern Mexico but raise the question of potential over-harvesting of the species and nutritional constraints for diet balancing.

5. Conclusions

G. ulmifolia has proven to be a valuable energy and nutrient source. Its use as a diet complement to adjust protein deficit in a basic–medium ration is valuable, considering that adequate nutrient intake is very important for sheep productivity and resistance to parasitological infection. However, in the limited allocation time of this study, the proposed G. ulmifolia supplementation had a limited impact on animal weight and BCS.
Despite the antiparasitic and nutritional benefits reported for CT in the literature, no apparent effect was highlighted for CT contained in G. ulmifolia foliage tested in this study. A longer lasting experiment with a higher percentage of this plant’s leaves is required to confirm these observations. Moreover, structural composition analysis of CTs proper to G. ulmifolia would be interesting in order to investigate whether the lack of effect could possibly be ascribed to an insufficient concentration of CTs or to their type.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-L.H., J.C.M.-A. and E.L.B.; methodology, J.-L.H., J.C.M.-A. and E.L.B.; software, J.-L.H.; validation, J.-L.H. and J.C.M.-A.; formal analysis, E.L.B., J.-L.H.; investigation, J.C.M.-A., E.L.B. and A.-Z.S.; resources, J.C.M.-A. and A.Z.S.; data curation, E.L.B. and J.C.M.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L.B. and J.C.M.-A.; writing—review and editing, J.-L.H., J.C.M.-A., E.L.B., and N.M.; visualization, E.L.B.; supervision, J.-L.H., J.C.M.-A. and N.M.; project administration, J.-L.H. and J.C.M.-A.; funding acquisition, J.-L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial assistance from the University of Liège was highly appreciated.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the University of Liège, Belgium, and the Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Mexico. Thank you to B. Losson for his kind proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vázquez-García, V. Sheep Production in the Mixed-Farming Systems of Mexico: Where are the Women? Rangelands 2013, 35, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nahed, T.J.; Gomez, H.; Pinto, R.; Guevara, F.; Medina, F.; Ibrahim, M.; Grande, D. Research and development of silvopastoral systems in a village in the buffer zone of the Ocote Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 5, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rubio, E.E.S.; Pérez Rodríguez, D.; Reyes, L.O.; Buenfil, G.Z. Evaluación del potencial forrajero de árboles y arbustos tropicales para la alimentación de ovinos. Téc. Pecu. Méx. 2004, 42, 129–144. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pinto-Ruiz, R.; Gómez-Castro, H.; Guevara-Hernández, F.; Hernández-Sánchez, D.; Ruíz-Sesma, B. Preferencia y Conducta ingestiva de ovinos alimentados con frutos arbóreos tropicales. Rev. Cient. FCV-LUZ 2014, 24, 158–163. [Google Scholar]
  5. Martínez-Alfaro, J.C.; Valdés-Oyervides, F.J.; Ruíz-Zarate, F. Preferencia y conducta ingestiva de la oveja Pelibuey sobre el follaje de árboles tropicales. In Proceedings of the 1st Congreso Mesoamericano de Investigación, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico, 1–3 October 2014; Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas: Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Mexico, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mavrot, F.; Hertzberg, H.; Torgerson, P. Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pugh, D.G.; Baird, A.N.; Edmondson, M.A.; Passler, T. Internal parasites of sheep, goats, and cervids. In Sheep, Goat, and Cervid Medicine, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2021; pp. 276–326. [Google Scholar]
  8. Herrera-Manzanilla, F.A.; Ojeda-Robertos, N.F.; González-Garduño, R.; Cámara-Sarmiento, R. Gastrointestinal nematode populations with multiple anthelmintic resistance in sheep farms from the hot humid tropics of Mexico. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 9, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mondragón-Ancelmo, J.; Olmedo-Juárez, A.; Reyes-Guerrero, D.E.; Ramírez-Vargas, G.; Ariza-Román, A.E.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Mendoza de Gives, P.; Napolitano, F. Detection of gastrointestinal nematode populations resistant to albendazole and ivermectin in sheep. Animals 2019, 9, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Santiago-Figueroa, I.; Lara-Bueno, A.; González-Garduño, R.; López-Arellano, M.E.; Luis, J.; Rosa-Arana, D.; Maldonado-Simán, E.D.J. Anthelmintic resistance in hair sheep farms in a sub-humid tropical climate, in the Huasteca Potosina, Mexico. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2019, 17, 100–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Graef, J.; Claerebout, E.; Geldhof, P. Anthelmintic resistance of gastrointestinal cattle nematodes. Vlaams Diergeneeskd. Tijdschr. 2013, 82, 113–123. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abbott, K.A.; Taylor, M.; Stubbings, L.A. Sustainable Worm Control Strategies for Sheep: A Technical Manual for Veterinary Surgeons and Advisers, 4th ed.; SCOPS: Worcestershire, UK, 2012; pp. 18–19, 33–41, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  13. Terrill, T.H.; Miller, J.E.; Burke, J.M.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Kaplan, R.M. Experiences with integrated concepts for the control of Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats in the United States. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Sotiraki, S.; Louvandini, H.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Terrill, T.H. Tannin containing legumes as a model for nutraceuticals against digestive parasites in livestock. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Quijada, J.; Chan-Perez, I.; Dakheel, M.M.; Kommuru, D.S.; Terrill, T.H.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Interactions between nutrition and infections with Haemonchus contortus and related gastrointestinal nematodes in small ruminants. Adv. Parasitol. 2016, 93, 239–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kommuru, D.S.; Barker, T.; Desai, S.; Burke, J.M.; Ramsay, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Miller, J.E.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Kamisetti, N.; Terrill, T.H. Use of pelleted sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) for natural control of coccidia and gastro-intestinal nematodes in weaned goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Saratsis, A.; Voutzourakis, N.; Theodosiou, T.; Stefanakis, A.; Sotiraki, S. The effect of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) and carob pods (Ceratonia siliqua) feeding regimes on the control of lamb coccidiosis. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2233–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mueller-Harvey, I.; Bee, G.; Dohme-Meier, F.; Hoste, H.; Karonen, M.; Kölliker, R.; Lüscher, A.; Niderkorn, V.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Salminen, J.P.; et al. Benefits of condensed tannins in forage legumes fed to ruminants: Importance of structure, concentration, and diet composition. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 861–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. León-Castro, Y.; Olivares-Pérez, J.; Rojas-Hernández, S.; Villa-Mancera, A.; Valencia-Almazán, M.T.; Hernández-Castro, E.; Córdova-Izquierdo, A.; Jiménez-Guillén, R. Effect of three fodder trees on Haemonchus contortus control and weight variations in kids. Ecosist. Recur. Agropecu. 2015, 2, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
  20. Feedbase, Bastard Cedar (Guazuma ulmifolia), Aerial Part, Fresh: Individual Data. Available online: http://www.feedbase.com/feedsample.php?Lang=E&name=5723&databasis=2 (accessed on 1 April 2020).
  21. Alarcon-Aguilara, F.J.; Roman-Ramos, R.; Perez-Gutierrez, S.; Aguilar-Contreras, A.; Contreras-Weber, C.C.; Flores-Saenz, J.L. Study of the anti-hyperglycemic effect of plants used as antidiabetics. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1998, 61, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alonso-Castro, A.J.; Salazar-Olivo, L.A. The anti-diabetic properties of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam are mediated by the stimulation of glucose uptake in normal and diabetic adipocytes without inducing adipogenesis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 118, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Caballero-George, C.; Vanderheyden, P.M.; De Bruyne, T.; Shahat, A.A.; Van den Heuvel, H.; Solis, P.N.; Gupta, M.P.; Claeys, M.; Pieters, L.; Vauquelin, G.; et al. In vitro inhibition of [3H]-angiotensin II binding on the human AT1 receptor by proanthocyanidins from Guazuma ulmifolia bark. Planta Med. 2002, 68, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magos, G.A.; Mateos, J.C.; Páez, E.; Fernández, G.; Lobato, C.; Márquez, C.; Enríquez, R.G. Hypotensive and vasorelaxant effects of the procyanidin fraction from Guazuma ulmifolia bark in normotensive and hypertensive rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 117, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hör, M.; Rimpler, H.; Heinrich, M. Inhibition of intestinal chloride secretion by proanthocyanidins from Guazuma ulmifolia. Planta Med. 1995, 61, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Berenguer, B.; Trabadela, C.; Sánchez-Fidalgo, S.; Quílez, A.; Miño, P.; De la Puerta, R.; Martín-Calero, M.J. The aerial parts of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. protect against NSAID-induced gastric lesions. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Camporese, A.; Balick, M.J.; Arvigo, R.; Esposito, R.G.; Morsellino, N.; De Simone, F.; Tubaro, A. Screening of anti-bacterial activity of medicinal plants from Belize (Central America). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 87, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Navarro, M.C.; Montilla, M.P.; Cabo, M.M.; Galisteo, M.; Cáceres, A.; Morales, C.; Berger, I. Antibacterial, antiprotozoal and antioxidant activity of five plants used in Izabal for infectious diseases. Phytother. Res. 2003, 17, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Felipe, A.M.; Rincão, V.P.; Benati, F.J.; Linhares, R.E.; Galina, K.J.; De Toledo, C.E.; Lopes, G.C.; De Mello, J.C.; Nozawa, C. Antiviral effect of Guazuma ulmifolia and Stryphnodendron adstringens on poliovirus and bovine herpesvirus. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 1092–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Secretaría De Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca Y Alimentación. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-ZOO-1999, Especificaciones Técnicas Para la Producción, Cuidado y uso de los Animales de Laboratorio; Diario Oficial de la Federación, 22 de agosto 2001, Primera sección; Secretaría de Gobernación: Ciudad de México, México, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  31. García, E. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen, 5th ed.; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geografía: Cuidad de México, México, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Thienpont, D.; Rochette, F.; Vanparijs, O.F.J. Diagnosing Helminthiasis by Coprological Examination, 2nd ed.; Janssen Research Foundation: Beerse, Belgium, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nozière, L.D.P.; Sauvant, D.; Delaby, L. INRA Feeding System for Ruminants; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thompson, J.; Meyer, H. Body Condition Scoring of Sheep; Oregon State University Extension Service: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  35. Becker, A.C.; Kraemer, A.; Epe, C.; Strube, C. Sensitivity and efficiency of selected coproscopical methods—Sedimentation, combined zinc sulfate sedimentation-flotation, and McMaster method. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2581–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; AOAC: Gaitherburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  37. Agence Française de Normalisation. Norm NF U44-171: Sludge, organic soil conditioners, growth media, determination of dry matter. In AFNOR Guideline; AFNOR Editions; Agence Française de Normalisation: Paris, France, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mercurio, M.D.; Dambergs, R.G.; Herderich, M.J.; Smith, P.A. High throughput analysis of red wine and grape phenolics-adaptation and validation of methyl cellulose precipitable tannin assay and modified somers color assay to a rapid 96 well plate format. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4651–4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. SAS/STAT®, Version 9.4; Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2002–2012.
  41. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  42. Meschy, F. Nutrition Minérale des Ruminants; Editions Quae: Versailles, France, 2010; pp. 19–36, 56. [Google Scholar]
  43. Agabriel, J. Alimentation des Bovins, Ovins et Caprins: Besoins des Animaux, Valeurs des Aliments: Tables Inra 2007, Mise à Jour 2010; Editions Quae: Versailles, France, 2010; p. 17. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lui, S.M.; Master, D.G. Potential impact of nematode parasitism on nutrient partitioning for wool production, growth and reproduction in sheep. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2003, 43, 1409–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Méndez-Ortíz, F.A.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Vargas-Magaña, J.J.; Sarmiento-Franco, L.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Ventura-Cordero, J. Impact of gastrointestinal parasitism on dry matter intake and live weight gain of lambs: A meta-analysis to estimate the metabolic cost of gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 265, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Waghorn, G. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production-Progress and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 116–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chartier, C.; Itard, J.; Morel, P.; Troncy, P. Précis de Parasitologie Vétérinaire Tropicale; Editions Tec et Doc: Paris, France, 2000; pp. 42–43. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zajac, A.M. Gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants: Life cycle, anthelmintics, and diagnosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food. Anim. Pract. 2006, 22, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zeller, W.E. Activity, purification, and analysis of condensed tannins: Current state of affairs and future endeavors. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 886–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cenci, F.B.; Louvandini, H.; McManus, C.M.; DelľPorto, A.; Costa, D.M.; Araújo, S.C.; Minho, A.P.; Abdalla, A.L. Effects of Condensed Tannin from Acacia mearnsii on Sheep Infected Naturally with Gastrointestinal Helminthes. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 144, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Iqbal, Z.; Sarwar, M.; Jabbar, A.; Ahmed, S.; Nisa, M.; Sajid, M.S.; Khan, M.N.; Mufti, K.A.; Yaseen, M. Direct and indirect anthelmintic effects of condensed tannins in sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 144, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F.; Coop, R.L. Direct anthelmintic effects of condensed tannins towards different gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep: In vitro and in vivo studies. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 99, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 10 01617 g001 550
Figure 1. Energy (a) and protein (b) requirement, offered and ingested in sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). Calculations according to the INRA system. kJ: kilojoule, d: day, g: gram.
Figure 1. Energy (a) and protein (b) requirement, offered and ingested in sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). Calculations according to the INRA system. kJ: kilojoule, d: day, g: gram.
Animals 10 01617 g001
Animals 10 01617 g002 550
Figure 2. Evolution of the body condition score of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Figure 2. Evolution of the body condition score of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Animals 10 01617 g002
Animals 10 01617 g003 550
Figure 3. Evolution of body weight of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Figure 3. Evolution of body weight of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Animals 10 01617 g003
Animals 10 01617 g004 550
Figure 4. Evolution of gastrointestinal strongyle-“type” eggs per gram of feces (EPG) of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Figure 4. Evolution of gastrointestinal strongyle-“type” eggs per gram of feces (EPG) of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Animals 10 01617 g004
Animals 10 01617 g005 550
Figure 5. Evolution of Eimeria spp. oocysts per gram of feces (OPG) of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1) spp. d: day.
Figure 5. Evolution of Eimeria spp. oocysts per gram of feces (OPG) of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1) spp. d: day.
Animals 10 01617 g005
Animals 10 01617 g006 550
Figure 6. Evolution of Strongyloides papillosus eggs per gram of feces (EPG) of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Figure 6. Evolution of Strongyloides papillosus eggs per gram of feces (EPG) of sheep fed on C. nlemfuensis hay alone (G0) or G. ulmifolia foliage and C. nlemfuensis hay (G1). d: day.
Animals 10 01617 g006
Table
Table 1. Group characteristics according to initial animal parameters (mean ± SE).
Table 1. Group characteristics according to initial animal parameters (mean ± SE).
ParametersGroupp-Value
G0G1
Age (year)1.6 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.61
Body weight (kg)28.4 ± 0.528.4 ± 1.11
BCS (/5)2.8 ± 0.42.9 ± 0.40.8
Gastrointestinal strongyle-“type” eggs (EPG)202 ± 10277 ± 350.7
Eimeria spp. oocysts (OPG)430 ± 24493 ± 170.7
Strongyloides papillosus eggs (EPG)93 ± 11132 ± 250.7
SE: standard error; G0: sheep offered only C. nlemfuensis hay; G1: sheep offered 30% DM G. ulmifolia foliage and 70% DM C. nlemfuensis hay; BCS: body condition score; EPG: eggs per gram; OPG: oocysts per gram.
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition, energy, and protein values of G. ulmifolia (fresh foliage) and C. nlemfuensis (hay) offered to sheep.
Table 2. Chemical composition, energy, and protein values of G. ulmifolia (fresh foliage) and C. nlemfuensis (hay) offered to sheep.
ParametersG. ulmifolia (foliage)C. nlemfuensis (hay)
AverageSDAverageSD
Dry matter (% Fresh matter)38.70.883.00.9
Crude ash (% DM)10.71.310.52.7
Crude protein (% DM)15.42.36.92.3
Crude fiber (% DM)22.92.434.54.6
NDF (% DM)62.73.868.58.2
Total tannins (% DM)0.790.05/
Condensed tannins (% DM)1.050.04/
Calcium (g/kg DM)19.05.04.20.5
Phosphorus (g/kg DM)3.10.41.70.9
Potassium (g/kg DM)18.62.314.90.5
Sodium (g/kg DM)0.10.11.11.1
Magnesium (g/kg DM)4.40.71.70.3
Copper (mg/kg DM)30.218.57.35.0
Iron (mg/kg DM)86.523.8368.5261.9
Manganese (mg/kg DM)49.95.579.48.4
Zinc (mg/kg DM)31.014.432.76.4
Net energy (kJ/kg DM) 5693724726106
IDP (% DM)9.00.56.20.8
RDNB (g)66.521.9−9.87.9
SD: standard deviation; DM: dry matter; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; IDP: intestinal digestible protein (according to INRA system); RDNB: rumen degradable nitrogen balance.
Table
Table 3. Mean weight, BCS, and parasitic loads of sheep offered hay of C. nlmenfuensis alone (G0) or supplemented with fresh foliage of G. ulmifolia (G1) (mean ± SE).
Table 3. Mean weight, BCS, and parasitic loads of sheep offered hay of C. nlmenfuensis alone (G0) or supplemented with fresh foliage of G. ulmifolia (G1) (mean ± SE).
Parameters/ParasitesGroupp-Value
G0G1
Body weight (kg)27.8 ± 2.128.6 ± 1.90.77
BCS (/5)2.6 ± 0.22.8± 0.20.32
Gastrointestinal strongyle-“type” eggs (EPG)562 ± 241 791 ± 4480.57
Eimeria spp. oocysts (OPG)338 ± 123353 ± 1300.91
Strongyloides papillosus eggs (EPG)141 ± 80113 ± 550.75
SE: standard error; G0: sheep offered only C. nlemfuensis hay; G1: sheep offered 30% DM G. ulmifolia foliage and 70% DM C. nlemfuensis hay; BCS: body condition score; EPG: eggs per gram feces; OPG: oocysts per gram feces.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le Bodo, E.; Hornick, J.-L.; Moula, N.; Zuñiga, S. A.; Martínez-Alfaro, J.C. Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasites and Productive Parameters on Sheep Fed on a Ration Supplemented with Guazuma ulmifolia Leaves in Southern Mexico. Animals 2020, 10, 1617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091617

AMA Style

Le Bodo E, Hornick J-L, Moula N, Zuñiga SA, Martínez-Alfaro JC. Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasites and Productive Parameters on Sheep Fed on a Ration Supplemented with Guazuma ulmifolia Leaves in Southern Mexico. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091617

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le Bodo, Emelyne, Jean-Luc Hornick, Nassim Moula, Serrano Aracely Zuñiga, and Juan Carlos Martínez-Alfaro. 2020. "Assessment of Gastrointestinal Parasites and Productive Parameters on Sheep Fed on a Ration Supplemented with Guazuma ulmifolia Leaves in Southern Mexico" Animals 10, no. 9: 1617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091617

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop