Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Localization of Calb2 in Both the Testis and Ovary of the Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)
Next Article in Special Issue
Productive and Physiological Response of Male Rabbits to Dietary Supplementation with Thyme Essential Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Human-Animal Relationship Dysfunction: A Case Study of Animal Hoarding in Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Exhibits High Predicted Binding Affinity to ACE2 from Lagomorphs (Rabbits and Pikas)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/ani10091502
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plasmatic Profile of Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein (PAG) during Gestation and Postpartum in Sarda and Lacaune Sheep Determined with Two Radioimmunoassay Systems

by
Martina De Carolis
1,†,
Olimpia Barbato
1,*,†,
Gabriele Acuti
1,
Massimo Trabalza-Marinucci
1,
Noelita Melo de Sousa
2,
Claudio Canali
1 and
Livia Moscati
3
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy
2
Laboratory of Animal Endocrinology and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
3
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche, via G. Salvemini 1, 06126 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2020, 10(9), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091502
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 19 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 25 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunohistochemical and Physiological Research on Farm Animals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Nowadays the need to optimize and maximize the productivity of dairy sheep leads farmers to plan lambing in specific periods in order to avoid economic loss due to nonproductive animals. The goal is to diagnose pregnancy at early gestation in order to minimize the costs of unproductive animals and to properly formulate rations for the energy requirements of gestating or lactating animals at the same time. Moreover, early pregnancy diagnosis, as well as the possibility of distinguishing between single and multiple gestations, enables farmers to plan the management of lambing well in advance thus minimizing manpower requirements. This study showed, for the first time, the plasmatic profile of PAG (pregnancy-associated glycoproteins) in Sarda and Lacaune ewes during gestation and the postpartum period using two different radioimmune assay (RIA) systems, thus enhancing our knowledge regarding PAG concentrations in domestic ruminants. Moreover, it showed that for both breeds these RIA systems are capable of distinguishing pregnant from nonpregnant ewes starting from day 18 of gestation. Furthermore, the rapid disappearance of PAG concentration following lambing did not require the use of a cut-off limit in postpartum animals as a means for detecting a new pregnancy.

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine ovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (oPAG) levels in the plasma of Sarda and Lacaune ewes throughout gestation and in the first month postpartum, using two heterologous radioimmunoassays (RIA-706 and RIA-srPool) and to study the correlations between PAG levels and fetal gender and number. On Day 18 of pregnancy, PAG concentrations were detected in 90.1% and 80.8% of Sarda pregnant ewes with RIA-706 and RIA-srPool, respectively; and in 90% and in 75% of Lacaune pregnant ewes with RIA-706 and RIA-srPool, respectively. From Day 30, PAG concentrations were detected in all pregnant ewes by using both RIA methods. In the postpartum period, the PAG concentrations in Sarda ewes decreased rapidly reaching minimal levels (<1 ng/mL) on day 28 using both RIA-706 and RIA-srPool. In Lacaune ewes, PAG-706 levels were higher than PAG-srPool from parturition until the last day of observation (Day 28 postpartum). It was also observed that mean concentrations were higher in multiple than in single pregnancies in Sarda and Lacaune ewes. Moreover, due to the rapid disappearance of PAG concentration following lambing, a cut-off limit in postpartum animals was not required as a means for detecting a new pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Nowadays the need to optimize and maximize the productivity of dairy sheep leads farmers to plan lambing in specific periods in order to avoid economic loss due to nonproductive animals. The goal is to diagnose pregnancy at early gestation in order to minimize the fodder wasted on unproductive animals and to properly formulate rations for the energy requirements of gestating or lactating animals at the same time. Moreover, early pregnancy diagnosis, as well as the possibility of distinguishing between single and multiple gestations, enables farmers to plan the management of lambing well in advance thus minimizing manpower requirements.
In this regard, over the past 30 years, techniques such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) for pregnancy detection have been developed using pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) which are glycoproteins belonging to the aspartic proteinase family and are synthesized in the ruminant trophectoderm [1]. Glycoproteins associated with pregnancy in sheep are represented by PAGs (OPAG) [2,3,4] and SBU-3 [5]. In ovine placenta, 11 cDNA coding for distinct PAGs (ovPAG-1 to ovPAG-11) were identified at different gestational periods, thus confirming the multiplicity and temporal expression of PAG molecules in ruminant placenta [1,6,7,8,9,10].
These molecules are present in maternal plasma of sheep in concentrations detectable with RIA methods as early as 18–20 days after conception, [3,11,12,13,14,15,16] and by the enzyme immune assay (EIA) method [17,18,19], as well as in other species of ruminants [1,20,21,22]. Throughout pregnancy, PAG concentrations in these species differ according to the breed, fetal number, sex and birth weight [3,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], as in other ruminants [30].
To our knowledge, no studies have yet been carried out on PAG plasma concentration profiles during gestation and the postpartum period in Sarda and Lacaune ewes, two amongst the most important dairy sheep present in Europe.
Sarda is the main sheep breed raised in Italy and it has been selected over the years for milk production [31,32]. The breeding system is typically characterized by one lambing per year and the mating season starts in early summer (or early autumn for ewe lambs). However, especially for yearlings, total fertility rate is not higher than 75%. When lambing occurs in early spring, since the breeding system is based on pasture, milk production is positively affected by high forage availability. However, strategies to favor out-of-season lambing are encouraged to ensure cheese availability for the market over the year [33,34].
The Lacaune breed originates from the Roquefort area, Southern France. It is the main French dairy sheep breed and has been very efficiently selected during the last 40 years [35]. The Lacaune is now a high milk yield sheep that, contrary to what happens for the Sarda breed, is also appreciated for lamb growth rate and the characteristics of its meat. Moreover, out-of-season lambing is common, and the breeding system is not necessarily based on pasture, being characterized by a large use of conserved forages and concentrates.
Both breeds would benefit from an early pregnancy diagnosis to reduce economic losses and increase productivity [36].
The aim of this study was to investigate the concentrations of plasma PAG using two heterologous radioimmunoassays (RIA-706 and RIA-srPool) in Lacaune and Sarda sheep throughout gestation and after parturition, and to study the correlations between PAG levels and fetal gender and number. Correlations between concentrations measured with the aforementioned RIA systems, their ability to detect PAG molecules during pregnancy and their half-life were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Samples

Thirty-five Sarda ewes weighing 42 ± 1.4 kg (mean ± SEM) at mating, and thirty-five Lacaune ewes weighing 46 ± 1.2 kg (mean ± SEM) at mating from a single flock were enrolled in this study. All of the ewes were in their first lactation during the period September–January of 2008. The ewes were housed and managed at the Azienda Zootecnica Didattica of the University of Perugia. The experimental site is approximately 15 km southwest of Perugia, Italy (latitude: 41°34′ N and longitude: 14°39′ E) at an elevation of approximately 650 m above sea level. The area has a Mediterranean climate with an annual rainfall of approximately 650 mm, distributed mainly during late autumn and winter, and mean maximum and minimum temperatures ranging between 15.7 and 8.4 °C over the last 40 years.
Blood samples were withdrawn from the jugular vein and placed into EDTA-coated tubes (Sarstedt®, Numbrecht, Germany). The samples were collected on Days 0 (day of mating), 18, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 after mating and during the postpartum period, starting within 12 h of birth (p) and on Days 7, 14, 21, 28. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation (2500× g for 15 min) immediately after collection and was stored at −20 °C until assay.

2.2. Experimental Design

The two groups of ewes were housed in two separate 15 × 5 m straw-bedded pens. The animals were subjected to the same management practices and had feed and water readily available in feeders and troughs in order to ensure an adequate intake of food and water. The basal diet was composed of alfalfa hay (2.0–2.5 kg/head/day, depending on the breed) which was supplemented with pelleted concentrate (crude protein: 180 g/kg; neutral detergent fiber: 149 g/kg as fed) during lactation and the last two months of pregnancy (800 g and 600 g/head/day, respectively) (Mignini&Petrini Spa., Petrignano di Assisi, Perugia, Italy) to meet nutrient requirements according to Cannas (2004) [37].
The ewes were synchronized with intravaginal sponges containing 40 mg fluorogestone acetate (Cronogest sponge, Intervet, Milan, Italy) for 12 days. On sponge withdrawal, the ewes were injected (i.m.) with 350 UI PMSG (Pregnant mare serum gonadotropin) ((Folligon, Intervet, Milan, Italy) and 36 h later two rams of proven fertility were introduced (September 2008) to each group for one day and the females were then separated after mating.
Conception was assumed to have occurred 149 days before parturition, which is the average gestation period for sheep. The number and sex of lambs were recorded.
The lambs were kept with the mothers until the end of the trial.
The animals in this trial were supervised in compliance with Italian laws (DL 27 January 1992, n°116) and regulations regarding experimental animals. The experimental design was performed according to good veterinary practices under farm conditions.

2.3. Progesterone Assay

The radioimmunoassay analyses (progesterone, PAG) were performed at the University of Perugia (Department of Veterinary Medicine). Samples from Sarda and Lacaune ewes were assayed for progesterone using an extraction step described elsewhere [38,39]. Progesterone was extracted from plasma with diethyl ether and the efficiency of the extraction procedure was monitored by addition of a tracer amount of (3H) progesterone. The efficiency of the ether extraction ranged from 85 to 95%. Extraction was carried out with 0.2 mL plasma and each sample was assayed in duplicate. Volumes of 0.8 mL of distilled water and 3 mL of diethyl ether were then added to each sample and centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min. Following freezing, the supernatant was discarded and 1 mL of borate buffer with 10% ethanol was added to all samples. Standard curve dilution was prepared using plain tubes for total counts and nonspecific binding. A 0.1 mL volume of increasing concentrations of calibrators (P4), 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 40 ng/mL was added. Reference samples (0.5 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL) were also added as quality controls. 3H-labeled progesterone (0.1 mL) and 0.1 mL of progesterone antibody were added to the experimental plasma samples extracted. Incubation was carried out at 4 °C for at least 4 h. The radioactivity antibody bound P4 from free P4 was separated by centrifugation following dextran-charcoal adsorption. The tubes were transferred to a beta-counter (Tri-carb 2100 TR, Packard) to be counted. The minimum detection limit (MDL) was 0.09 ng/mL. Intra and interassay coefficients of variation (CV) were 8 and 12%, respectively.

2.4. Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein Assays

Two different radioimmunoassay systems (RIA-706 and RIA srPool) obtained from the methods previously described in detail by Perenyi et al. [40,41] and Barbato et al. [12] were used to measure pregnancy-associated glycoprotein concentrations. All the assays were performed in Tris buffer containing 1% BSA (Fraction V, ICN Biochemicals Inc., Aurora, OH, USA). Measurements were performed in polystyrene tubes and all of the incubations were performed at room temperature (20 to 22 °C). Bovine PAG 67 kDa preparation (boPAG67kDa, accession number Q29432) was used as standard and tracer for all assays [30,42].
The ewe samples (0.1 mL, in duplicate) were assayed in a preincubated system. In short, 0.1 mL of each sample, or appropriate standard dilution, were aliquoted into duplicate assay tubes and diluted with 0.1 mL and 0.2 mL of Tris-BSA buffer, respectively. In order to minimize nonspecific interference of plasma proteins, 0.1 mL of bovine PAG-free plasma was added to all standard tubes. Subsequently the antisera (1:80,000 for RIA-706 and 1:50,000 for RIA-srPool) were added and the tubes were incubated overnight at room temperature before adding radio-labelled PAG [40]. Iodination (Na-I125, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) was carried out according to the Chloramine T method [43].
Samples with higher PAG concentrations than the estimated standard dose for which the percentage B/B0 was 20% (ED20) were reassayed in nonpreincubated systems in which the standard curves ranged from 0.8 to 100 ng/mL. In these systems, the tracer was added simultaneously with one of the aforementioned first antibodies (AS#706: 1/80,000 and AS#Pool: 1/50,000). The following day, the double antibody precipitation system was added and a further 30 min incubation was carried out before separation of bound and free PAG.
The minimum detection limit (MDL), calculated as the mean concentration minus twice standard deviation (mean – 2 SD) of 20 duplicates of the zero (B0) standard [44] were, respectively, 0.4 ng/mL and 0.3 ng/mL for RIA-706 and RIA sr-Pool. Intra-assay CVs of RIA-srPool were 5.8% and 9.5%, respectively. Interassay CVs of RIA-706 and srPool were 5.0% and 3.0%, respectively.

2.5. Pregnancy Diagnosis

A cut-off value of 1.0 ng/mL was used for concentrations of progesterone or PAG (RIA-706, RIA-srPool) in order to distinguish between pregnant and nonpregnant females [12].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein and progesterone concentrations were expressed as least square means ± standard error of the mean (±SEM).
The data obtained were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS (2013) [45]. A mixed model with repeated measures considering sheep breed (Sarda or Lacaune), RIA method (POV or 706), sampling time (day of mating and 18, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 days after mating; during the postpartum period starting within 12 h from lambing and then on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 of lactation), type of delivery (single or multiple) and sex of fetuses as fixed factors, and all possible interactions between main factors was used. The ewe was considered as a random factor.
Due to the small number of twin pregnancies, the effect of fetus gender were estimated for single pregnancies only.
Two interactions (sheep breed × RIA method and sheep breed × RIA method × sampling time) were removed from the model because the results of ANOVA were not statistically significant.
Differences between the least square means were evaluated by Tukey test (p < 0.05). Tendencies were discussed when p > 0.05 but ≤ 0.10.
The chi-square test was used to assess the agreement between the two RIA methods in early pregnancy (at 18 and 30 days after mating).
Finally, the elimination rate constant was calculated from the slope of the line during the postpartum period by linear regression analysis of the semilogarithmic plot of PAG concentrations versus time, while the half-life was obtained as (ln 2 /elimination rate constant).

3. Results

From a total of 35 synchronized Sarda and 35 Lacaune ewes, 26 and 20 animals became pregnant respectively as shown by the RIA analysis and the lambing rate.
Nine Sarda and 15 Lacaune sheep were diagnosed to be nonpregnant and were considered as negative controls. They gave PAG concentrations below the cut-off value.
Among the Sarda ewes, 20 had single pregnancies while six carried twins. The average length of gestation was 149.5 days (149.1 and 148.1 for ewes carrying one and two fetuses, respectively). There were 14 male fetuses.
In Lacaune ewes, 14 had single pregnancies while six carried twins. The average length of gestation was 146.0. There were 15 male fetuses.

3.1. Progesterone Concentrations

Progesterone concentrations were detectable in 26/26 (100%) and 20/20 (100%) of pregnant Sarda and Lacaune ewes, respectively. The mean progesterone level of nonpregnant Sarda and Lacaune ewes on Day 18 were 0.1 ± 0.1 ng/mL for both breeds. In pregnant females, progesterone levels ranged from 5.26 ± 0.7 ng/mL on Day 18 to 6.05 ± 0.5 ng/mL on Day 60 for Sarda ewes, and from 10.9 ± 1 ng/mL on Day 18 to 12.0 ± 0.7 ng/mL on Day 60 for Lacaune ewes.

3.2. Profiles of RIA-706 and RIA-srPool during Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in Sarda and Lacaune Ewes

Similar PAG profiles were observed for both breeds. PAG plasma concentrations detected with RIA-706 were lower than the PAG levels detected with RIA-srPool (overall means: 21.82 ± 0.83 vs 30.49 ng/mL ± 0.83, respectively). However, a significant (p < 0.001) interaction between the RIA method and sampling time was detected and differences between the two methods were only recorded on days 45, 60, 75 and 90 during pregnancy, while no differences were observed during the postpartum period (Table 1).
Regarding the effect of breed, higher plasma PAG values were observed for Lacaune ewes than for Sarda ewes (overall means: 27.41 ± 0.90 vs 24.90 ± 0.86 ng/mL, respectively). When plotting the values of the interaction between sheep breed and sampling time together (p < 0.001), significant differences were only observed on days 75 and 90 (Figure 1) for both RIA systems.
No differences were observed during the postpartum period. For both RIA systems, at 28 days postpartum recorded values fell below 1 ng/mL (cut-off ≥ 1 ng/mL).
On day 18 of pregnancy the PAG concentrations in Sarda ewes were ≥ 1 ng/mL (cut-off value) in 25/26 (96.1%) and in 22/26 (80.8%) with RIA-706 and RIA-srPool, respectively. As described in Table 2, it was possible to detect PAG in all pregnant animals as early as Day 30.
Mean PAG-706 and PAG-srPool progressively increased from the day of conception (0.08 ± 0.02 and 0.06 ± 0.02 ng/mL, respectively) until day 60 (43.77 ± 5.64 and 73.62 ± 5.64, respectively) then decreased until stabilizing on day 90 (16.25 ± 3.64 and 27.46 ± 3.64, respectively), after which they increased and peaked on the day of delivery (56.77 ± 8.50 and 73.07 ± 8.50 ng/mL, respectively).
In this breed, both PAG-706 and PAG-srPool progressively decreased from parturition reaching values below 1 ng/mL at 28 days after lambing (0.39 ± 0.13 and 0.44 ± 0.13 ng/mL, respectively).
We used scatter plots of ln PAG-706 and ln PAG-srPool concentrations versus postpartum days to calculate the kinetic parameters. The elimination rate constants were 0.12 day−1 and 0.13 day−1 while the half-lives were 5.8 days and 5.3 days for PAG-706 and PAG-srPool, respectively.
On day 18 of pregnancy, the concentrations of PAG in Lacaune ewes were ≥ 1 ng/mL (cut-off value) in 18/20 (90%) and in 15/20 (75%) measured with RIA-706 and RIA-srPool, respectively. As described in Table 2, it was possible to detect PAG as early as day 30 in all pregnant animals.
Mean PAG-706 and PAG-srPool progressively increased from the day of conception (0.11 ± 0.03 and 0.06 ± 0.03 ng/mL, respectively) to day 75 (50.83 ± 6.65 and 85.51 ± 6.65 ng/mL, respectively), then decreased until day 120 (37.14 ± 3.34 and 35.33 ± 3.34 ng/mL, respectively), after which they increased and peaked on the day of delivery (57.86 ± 9.69 and 58.95 ± 9.69, respectively).
Both PAG-706 and PAG-srPool progressively decreased following parturition, but during the postpartum period at 28 days after lambing, PAG concentrations once again exceeded 1 ng/mL (1.45 ± 0.15 and ± 1.04 ± 0.15 ng/mL, respectively).
We used scatter plots of ln PAG-706 and ln PAG-srPool concentrations versus postpartum days to calculate the kinetic parameters. The elimination rate constants were 0.10 day−1 and 0.11 day−1 while the half-lives were 6.9 days and 6.3 days for PAG-706 and PAG-srPool, respectively.

3.3. Effects of Single Versus Multiple Pregnancies and Gender on PAG Concentrations

At delivery, in Sarda ewes multiple pregnancies were characterized by higher levels of PAG than single pregnancies (Figure 2 and Figure 3) disregarding RIA system (significant interaction breed × type of delivery × sampling time).
The PAG levels in plasma tended (p = 0.064) to be affected by the gender of the fetus (24.37 ± 0.78 vs 22.26 ± 0.84 for males and females, respectively). There were no significant interactions between gender of the fetus, sheep breed and RIA method.

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to be carried out on PAG plasma concentration profiles during gestation and the postpartum period in Sarda and Lacaune ewes, using two different radioimmunoassays, during the whole period of gestation and postpartum.
The PAG profile was similar in both breeds and in both RIA systems used. During the gestation period, PAG concentrations increased up to 60 days and then decreased until 120 days. Thereafter there was a significant rise, which peaked at parturition. This is a similar trend to that described by Gajewski et al. [46] for Berrichon ewes, by Ledezma-Torres et al. [14] for various sheep breeds and by Ranilla et al. [11,24] for Churra sheep, yet this trend was not observed for Merinos ewes whose PAG levels initially increased and then dropped to baseline concentrations around mid-pregnancy. Patterns of plasma ovine PAG concentrations differed from those reported for bovine [30], goats [47,48] and buffalo [20,49]. These differences could be explained by the ability of the antisera to distinguish between various epitopes [20].
In the first period of gestation, our data showed that both RIA (RIA-706 and RIA-srPool) are capable of diagnosing pregnancy as early as 18 days of gestation. Similarly, Ayad et al. (2007) [50] reported that it is easier to distinguish between pregnant and nonpregnant cows if a mixture of different antisera is used.
In Lacaune ewes, PAG concentrations measured by using RIA-706 were higher than those measured by RIA-srPool from parturition until the last day of observation (28 days postpartum). In Sarda ewes concentrations decreased rapidly reaching minimal levels (<1 ng/mL) at day 28 when using both RIA-706 and RIA-srPool. A similar decrease in PAG concentrations during the first month postpartum was reported by Ranilla et al. [11,24] for ewes, by Sousa et al. [41] and Gonzalez et al. [51] for goats, and for wild ruminants by Ropstad et al. [52] and Osborn et al. [53]. In these species, PAG concentration drops below 1 ng/mL at day 30 postpartum. In cows, PAG concentrations slowly decreased following parturition and were detected as late as 100 days postpartum [30]. The rapid decrease in PAG concentration during the postpartum period is essential when using PAG as an appropriate marker of pregnancy immediately after postpartum. Unlike in cows, the rapid PAG disappearance in ewes does not require the use of a cut-off limit in postpartum animals as a means for detecting a new pregnancy.
The half-life proved to be longer in Sarda and Lacaune sheep (6.3 to 6.9) than in other ovine breeds as reported by Haugejorden et al., 2006 [54] (4.5 days), or in buffalo females (5.8 days) [21,49]. However, it was shorter than in bovine species (from 7.0 to 8.8 days) [12,54,55,56] in goats (7.5 days) and Zebu (9.2–10.1 days) [57]. These differences could be due to the presence of N-linked carbohydrate and sialic acid chains on their structure [58].
This study demonstrated that mean PAG concentrations were higher in multiple pregnancies than in single pregnancies, at delivery in Sarda ewes. The higher concentrations in multiple delivery with respect to single delivery are possibly due to the higher member of attachment points, and thus secretory activity, of twin placentas [24]. Regarding the effect of the litter size on PAG concentration, our results showed for the Sarda sheep an evident peak of concentration at delivery, compared to Lacaune sheep, whether the RIA-706 or RIA-srPool was used. This behavior differs from that found in other breeds of sheep [3]. The structure of the placenta could be at the origin of this difference. In sheep before birth, a decrease in the number of binucleated cells is observed [59], and probably in the Sardinian sheep it could undergo a further increase in the prebirth period similar to what happens in cattle [42] and in Churra sheep [11]. However, a different profile during pregnancy was also found in the goat [60] and in the cow [61], depending on the breed.
From our data it was impossible to predict litter size. These results are in agreement with those of various authors [3,12,13,14,16,24,28] who were unable to predict litter size from PAG concentrations.
Our data show that PAG plasma levels tended to be affected by the gender of the fetus. This difference may be due to the weight of the placenta that differs according to gender [62,63]. Our results are in agreement with those reported by Guilbault et al. [64] and Zoli et al. [30] for bovine species, and by Ranilla et al. [11] for Churra ewes but not for Merinos ewes, and are in contrast to those reported by Vandale et al. [13] for Suffolk and Texel breeds, for which no significant differences were observed between ewes carrying fetuses of different gender. Moreover, our results suggest that the breed and the gender of the fetus could influence ovine PAG production.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study showed, for the first time, the plasmatic profile of PAG in Sarda e Lacaune ewes during gestation and the postpartum period using two different RIA-systems, thus enhancing our knowledge regarding PAG concentrations in domestic ruminants. Moreover, it showed that for both breeds, these RIA systems are capable of distinguishing pregnant from nonpregnant ewes starting from day 18 of gestation. Furthermore, the rapid disappearance of PAG concentration following lambing did not require the use of a cut-off limit in postpartum animals as a means for detecting a new pregnancy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing, M.D.C.; conceptualization and writing, O.B.; sample collection. G.A.; formal analysis and data curation, M.T.-M.; supervision, N.M.d.S.; laboratory analysis, C.C.; funding acquisition and supervision, L.M.; M.D.C. and O.B.: equal contributors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (IZS 10/08 RC).

Acknowledgments

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The feed used in the trial was purchased from Mignini & Petrini Spa (Petrignano di Assisi, Italy).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wallace, R.M.; Pohler, K.J.; Smith, M.F.; Green, J.A. Placental PAGs: Gene origins, expression patterns, and use as markers of pregnancy. Reproduction 2015, 149, R115–R126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Xie, S.; Low, B.G.; Nagel, R.J.; Kramer, K.K.; Anthony, R.V.; Zoli, A.P.; Beckers, J.F.; Roberts, R.M. Identification of the major pregnancy-specific antigens of cattle and sheep as inactive members of the aspartic proteinase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 10247–10251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Willard, J.M.; White, D.R.; Wesson, C.A.R.; Stellflug, J.; Sasser, R.G. Detection of fetal twins in sheep using a radioimmunoassay for pregnancy-specific protein B. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 960–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. El Amiri, B.; Remy, B.; Sousa, N.M.; Joris, B.; Otthiers, N.G.; Perény, Z.; Banga-Mboko, H.; Beckers, J.F. Isolation and partial characterization of three pregnancy-associated glycoproteins from the ewe placenta. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2003, 64, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gogolin-Ewens, K.J.; Lee, C.S.; Mercer, W.R.; Moseby, A.M.; Brandon, M.R. Characterization of a sheep trophoblast-derived antigen first appearing at implantation. Placenta 1986, 7, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, S.; Green, J.A.; Bao, B.; Beckers, J.F.; Valdez, K.E.; Hakami, L.; Roberts, R.M. Multiple pregnancy-associated glycoproteins are secreted by day 100 ovine placental tissue. Biol. Reprod. 1997, 57, 1384–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Xie, S.; Green, J.; Bixby, J.B.; Szafranska, B.; De Martini, J.C.; Hecht, S.; Roberts, R.M. The diversity and evolutionary relationships of the pregnancy-associated glycoproteins, an aspartic proteinase subfamily consisting of many trophoblast-expressed genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12809–12816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Green, J.A.; Xie, S.; Quan, X.; Bao, B.; Gan, X.; Mathialagan, N.; Roberts, R.M. Pregnancy-Associated glycoproteins exhibit spatially and temporally distinct expression patterns during pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 1624–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Garbayo, J.M.; Green, J.A.; Manikkam, M.; Beckers, J.F.; Kiesling, D.O.; Ealy, A.D.; Roberts, R.M. Caprine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG): Their cloning, expression, and evolutionary relationship to other PAG. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2000, 57, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Touzard, E.; Reinaud, P.; Dubois, O.; Guyader-Joly, C.; Humblot, P.; Ponsart, C.; Charpigny, J. Specific expression patterns and cell distribution of ancient and modern PAG in bovine placenta during pregnancy. Reproduction 2013, 146, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ranilla, M.J.; Sulon, J.; Carro, M.D.; Mantecon, A.R.; Beckers, J.F. Plasmatic profiles of pregnancy–associated glycoprotein and progesterone levels during gestation in Churra and Merino sheep. Theriogenology 1994, 42, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barbato, O.; Sousa, N.M.; Debenedetti, A.; Canali, C.; Todini, L.; Beckers, J.F. Validation of a new pregnancy-associated glycoprotein radioimmunoassay method for the detection of early pregnancy in ewes. Theriogenology 2009, 72, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vandaele, L.; Verberckmoes, S.; El Amiri, B.; Sulon, J.; Duchateau, L.; Van Soom, A.; Beckers, J.F.; de Kruift, A. Use of homolougous radioimmunoassay (RIA) to evaluate the effect of maternal and foetal parameters on pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) concentrations in sheep. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1914–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ledezma-Torres, R.A.; Beckers, J.F.; Holtz, W. Assessment of plasma profile of pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) in sheep with a heterologous (anti-caPAG22 + 59) RIA and its potential for diagnosing pregnancy. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 906–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El Amiri, B.; Sulon, J.; Karen, A.; Alvarez, A.V.; Cogniè, Y.; Sousa, N.M.; Szenci, O.; Beckers, J.F. Measurement of ovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) during early pregnancy in Lacaune sheep. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007, 42, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. El Amiri, B.; Sousa, N.M.; Alvarez Oxiley, A.; Hadarbach, D.; Beckers, J.F. Pregnancy-Associated glycoprotein (PAG) concentration in plasma and milk samples for early pregnancy diagnosis in Lacaune dairy sheep. Res. Vet. Sci. 2015, 99, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rovani, M.T.; Skrebsky Cezar, A.; Lazzari Rigo, M.; Garziera Gasperin, B.; da Nobrega, J.E.; Dias Torres, F.; Bayard Dias Goncalves, P.; Ferreira, R. Evaluation of a bovine pregnancy glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for serological diagnosis of pregnancy in sheep. Cienc. Rural 2016, 46, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Miranda e Silva Chaves, C.; da Costa, R.L.D.; Duarte, K.M.R.; Manchado, M.C.; de Paz, C.C.P.; Beltrame, R.T. Visual ELISA for detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) in ewes serum. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017, 97, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Steckeler, P.; Weber, F.; Zerbe, H.; Rieger, A.; Voigt, K. Evaluation of a bovine visual pregnancy test for the detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in sheep. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019, 54, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barbato, O.; Melo de Sousa, N.; Barile, V.L.; Canali, C.; Beckers, J.F. Purification of pregnancy associated glycoproteins from late pregnancy Bubalus bubalis placentas and development of a radioimmunoassay for pregnancy diagnosis in water buffalo females. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Barbato, O.; Menchetti, L.; Sousa, N.M.; Malfatti, A.; Brecchia, G.; Canali, C.; Beckers, J.F.; Barile, V.L. Pregnancy-Associated glycoproteins (PAGs) concentrations in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) during gestation and the postpartum period. Theriogenology 2017, 97, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Beriot, M.; Tchimbou, A.F.; Barbato, O.; Beckers, J.F.; de Sousa, N.M. Identification of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and alpha protein in fallow deer (Dama dama) placenta. Acta Vet. Scandinava 2014, 56, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mialon, M.M.; Camous, S.; Renand, G.; Martal, J.; Ménissier, F. Peripheral gestation of a 60_kDa pregnancy serum protein during gestation and after calving and in relationship to embryonic mortality in cattle. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1993, 33, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ranilla, M.J.; Sulon, J.; Mantecon, A.R.; Beckers, J.F.; Carro, M.F. Plasma pregnancy-associated glycoprotein and progesterone concentrations in pregnant Assaf ewes carrying single and twin lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 1997, 24, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karen, A.; El Amiri, B.; Beckers, J.F.; Sulon, J.; Taverne, M.A.M.; Szenzi, O. Comparison of accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography, progesterone and pregnancy-associated glycoproteins tests for discrimination between single or multiple pregnancy in sheep. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mercadante, P.M.; Waters, K.M.; Mercadante, V.G.R.; Lamb, G.C.; Elzo, M.A.; Johnson, M.E.; Rae, D.O.; Yelich, J.V.; Ealy, A.D. Subspecies differences in early fetal development and plasma pregnancy-associated glycoprotein concentrations in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 3693–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lobago, F.; Bekana, M.; Gustafsson, H.; Beckers, J.F.; Yohannes, G.; Aster, Y.; Kindahl, H. Serum Profiles of Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein, Oestrone Sulphate and Progesterone During Gestation and Some Factors Influencing the Profiles in Ethiopian Borana and Crossbred Cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, O.; Sulon, J.; Beckers, J.F.; Takahashi, T.; Hirako, M.; Sasaki, N.; Domeki, I. Plasma bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein concentrations throughout gestation in relationship to fetal number in the cow. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1997, 137, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wallace, J.M.; Aitken, R.P.; Cheyne, M.A.; Humblot, P. Pregnancy-Specific protein B and progesterone concentrations in relation to nutritional regimen, placental mass and pregnancy outcome in growing adolescent ewes carrying singleton fetuses. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1997, 109, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zoli, A.P.; Guilbault, L.A.; Delahaut, P.; Ortiz, W.B.; Beckers, J.F. Radioimmunoassay of a bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in serum: Its application for pregnancy diagnosis. Biol. Reprod. 1992, 46, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Macciotta, N.P.P.; Mele, M.; Cappio-Borlino, A.; Secchiari, P. Issues and perspectives in dairy sheep breeding. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 4, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Carta, A.; Casu, S.; Salaris, S. Invited review: Current state of genetic improvement in dairy sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 5814–5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sitzia, M.; Bonanno, A.; Todaro, M.; Cannas, A.; Atzori, A.S.; Francesconi, A.H.D.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M. Feeding and management techniques to favour summer sheep milk and cheese production in the Mediterranean environment. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 126, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Todaro, M.; Dattena, M.; Acciaioli, A.; Bonanno, A.; Bruni, G.; Caroprese, M.; Mele, M.; Sevi, A.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M. Aseasonal sheep and goat milk production in the Mediterranean area: Physiological and technical insights. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 126, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barillet, F.; Marie, C.; Jacquin, M.; Lagriffoul, G.; Astruc, J.M. The French Lacaune dairy sheep breed: Use in France and abroad in the last 40 years. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 71, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karen, A.; Beckers, J.F.; Sulon, J.; El amiri, B.; Szabados, S.; Ismail, S.; Reiczigel, J.; Szenci, O. Evalaution of false transrectal ultrasonographic pregnancy diagnoses in sheep by measuring tha plasma level of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2003, 43, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Cannas, A. Feeding of lactating ewes. In Dairy Sheep Nutrition; Pulina, G., Ed.; CABI: Bologna, Italy, 2004; pp. 79–108. [Google Scholar]
  38. Todini, L.; Malfatti, A.; Barbato, O.; Costarelli, S.; Debenedetti, A. Progesterone plus PMSG priming in seasonally anovulatory lactating Sarda ewes exposed to the ram effect. J. Reprod. Dev. 2007, 53, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Todini, L.; Marinucci, M.T.; Malfatti, A.; Barbato, O.; Cavallucci, C.; Debenedetti, A. Pre and post-feed ind plasma gastrin-17 and insulin concentrations and feed-intake in female goats during different physiological stages. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 71, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perenyi, Z.; Szenci, O.; Sulon, J.; Drion, P.V.; Beckers, J.F. Comparison of the ability of three radioimmunoassays to detect pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in bovine plasma. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2002, 37, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Perenyi, Z.; Szenci, O.; Drion, P.V.; Banga-Mboko, H.; Sousa, N.M.; El Amiri, B.; Beckers, J.F. Aspartic proteinase members secreted by the ruminant placenta: Specificity of three radioimmunoassay systems for the measurement of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2002, 37, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zoli, A.P.; Beckers, J.F.; Wouters-Ballman, P.; Closset, J.; Falmagne, P.; Ectors, F. Purification and characterization of a bovine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Biol. Reprod. 1991, 45, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Greenwood, F.C.; Hunter, W.M.; Glover, J.S. The preparation of 131-I labeled human growth hormone of high specific radioactivity. Biochemistry 1963, 89, 114–123. [Google Scholar]
  44. Skelley, D.S.; Brown, L.P.; Besch, P.K. Radioimmunoassay. Clin. Chem. 1973, 2, 146–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Statistical Analysis Software [SAS]. SAS/STAT User Guide, Version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gajewski, Z.; Beckers, J.F.; Sousa, N.M.; Thun, R.; Sulon, J.; Foundez, R. Determination of pregnancy associated glycoprotein concentration in sheep. A retrospective study. Adv. Cell Biol. 1999, 2, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sousa, N.M.; Garbayo, J.M.; Figueiredo, J.R.; Sulon, J.; Goncalvesa, P.B.D.; Beckers, J.F. Pregnancy-Associated glycoprotein and progesterone profiles during pregnancy and postpartum in native goats from the north-east of Brazil. Small Rumin. Res. 1999, 32, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gonzalez, F.; Sulon, J.; Garbayo, J.M.; Batista, M.; Cabrera, F.; Calero, P.O.; Gracia, A.; Beckers, J.F. Secretory profiles of pregnancy associated glycoproteins at different stages. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2000, 35, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Barbato, O.; Menchetti, L.; Sousa, N.M.; Brecchia, G.; Malfatti, A.; Canali, C.; Beckers, J.F.; Barile, V.L. Correlation of two radioimmunoassay systems for measuring pregnancy-associated glycoproteins plasma concentration during early pregnancy and post-partum period in water buffalo. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018, 53, 1483–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ayad, A.; Sousa, N.M.; Sulon, J.; Iguer-Ouada, M.; Beckers, J.F. Comparison of five radioimmunoassay systems for PAG measurement: Ability to detect early pregnancy in cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007, 4, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gonzalez, F.; Sulon, J.; Garbayo, J.M.; Batista, M.; Cabrera, F.; Calero, P.O.; Gracia, A.; Beckers, J.F. Early pregnancy diagnosis in goats of pregnancy associated glycoproteins in plasma samples. Theriogenology. 1999, 52, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ropstad, E.; Veiberg, V.; Sakkinen, H.; Dahl, A.; Kindahl, H.; Holand, O.; Beckers, J.F.; Eloranta, E. Endocrinology of pregnancy and early pregnancy detection by reproductive hormones in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1775–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Osborn, A.; Beckers, J.F.; Sulon, J.; Gassett, J.W.; Muller, L.I.; Murphy, B.P.; Miller, K.V.; Marchinton, L.R. Use of glycoprotein assays for pregnancy diagnois in White-Tailed Deer. J. Wildl. Manag. 1996, 60, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Haugejorden, G.; Wage, S.; Dahl, E.; Karlberg, K.; Beckers, J.F.; Ropstad, E. Pregnancy associated glycoproteins (PAG) in postpartum cows, ewes, goats and their offspring. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 1976–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sasser, R.G.; Ruder, C.A.; Kristen, A.I.; Butler, J.E.; Hamilton, W.C. Detection of pregnancy by novel pregnancy-specific protein in serum of cows and a profile of serum concentration during gestation. Biol. Reprod. 1986, 35, 936–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Kirakofe, G.H.; Wright, J.M.; Schalles, R.R.; Ruder, C.A.; Parish, S.; Sasser, R.G. Pregnancy-Specific protein B in serum of postpartum beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 71, 2199–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sousa, N.M.; Zongo, M.; Pitala, W.; Boly, H.; Sawadogo, L.; Sanon, M.; Figuereido, J.R.; Concalves, P.B.D.; El Amiri, B.; Prenényi, Z.; et al. Pregnancy-Associated glycoprotein concentrations during pregnancy and post partum period in Azawak Zebu Cattle. Theriogenology 2003, 59, 1131–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Klisch, K.; Boos, A.; Friedrich, M.; Herzog, K.; Feldmann, M.; Sousa, N.M.; Beckers, J.F.; Leiser, R.; Schuler, G. The glycosylation of pregnancy-associated glycoproteinsand prolactin-related protein-I in bovine binucleate trophoblastgiant cells changes before parturition. Reproduction 2006, 132, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wooding, F.B.P. Current topic: The synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: Binucleate cell fusions and hormone production. Placenta 1992, 12, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Batalha, E.S.; Sulon, J.; Figueiredo, E.S.; Beckers, J.F.; Espechit, C.J.B.; Martins, R.; Silva, L.D.M. Plasma profile of pregnancy associated glycoprotein (PAG) in alpine goats using two radioimmunoassay (RIA) systems. Small Rumin. Res. 2001, 42, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shahin, M.; Friedrich, M.; Gauly, M.; Holtz, W. Pregnancy-Associated glycoprotein (PAG) profile of Holstein–Friesian cows as compared to dual-purpose and beef cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014, 49, 618–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Greenwood, P.L.; Slepetis, R.M.; Bell, A.W. Influences on fetal and placental weights during mid to late gestation in prolific ewes well nourished throughout pregnancy. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2000, 12, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kaulfusb, K.H.; Schramm, D.; Berttram, M. Effects of genotype, dams age, litter size, birth weight and ram on morphological parameters of the placenta sheep. DTW 2000, 107, 269–275. [Google Scholar]
  64. Guilbault, L.A.; Roy, G.L.; Beckers, J.F.; Dufour, J.S. Influence of breed of fetus periparturient endocrine responses and subsequent milk production of Ayrshire dams. J. Dairy Sci. 1990, 73, 2766–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 10 01502 g001 550
Figure 1. Plasma PAG profile in Lacaune and Sarda ewes during pregnancy and postpartum when using (a) RIA-706 and (b) RIA-srPool.
Figure 1. Plasma PAG profile in Lacaune and Sarda ewes during pregnancy and postpartum when using (a) RIA-706 and (b) RIA-srPool.
Animals 10 01502 g001
Animals 10 01502 g002 550
Figure 2. Plasma PAG profile in multiple and single pregnancy at delivery in Sarda ewes when using (a) RIA-706 and (b) RIA-srPool.
Figure 2. Plasma PAG profile in multiple and single pregnancy at delivery in Sarda ewes when using (a) RIA-706 and (b) RIA-srPool.
Animals 10 01502 g002
Animals 10 01502 g003 550
Figure 3. Plasma PAG profile in multiple and single pregnancy at delivery in Lacaune ewes when using (a) RIA-706 and (b) RIA-srPool.
Figure 3. Plasma PAG profile in multiple and single pregnancy at delivery in Lacaune ewes when using (a) RIA-706 and (b) RIA-srPool.
Animals 10 01502 g003
Table
Table 1. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) values obtained before and after delivery according to radioimmune assay (RIA) methods.
Table 1. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) values obtained before and after delivery according to radioimmune assay (RIA) methods.
DaysRIA-706RIA-srPoolp-Value
Mating0.1480.0590.23
183.7354.7750.69
3016.90724.0340.59
4531.29850.189<0.001
6048.70978.444<0.001
7544.83669.821<0.001
9029.18346.975<0.001
12033.85234.1710.33
Delivery62.75371.8730.78
75.5738.0350.55
143.5764.2750.08
212.0571.7780.98
280.9980.8420.09
Table
Table 2. PAG detection (cut-off ≥ 1 ng/mL) in Sarda and Lacaune ewes according to RIA method (RIA-706 vs. RIA-srPool) at day 18 and day 30 of pregnancy.
Table 2. PAG detection (cut-off ≥ 1 ng/mL) in Sarda and Lacaune ewes according to RIA method (RIA-706 vs. RIA-srPool) at day 18 and day 30 of pregnancy.
Day of Pregnancy SardaLacaune
RIA-706RIA-srPoolRIA-706RIA-srPool
Day 18Nonpregnant1425
Pregnant25221815
Day 30Nonpregnant0000
Pregnant26262020

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Carolis, M.; Barbato, O.; Acuti, G.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Melo de Sousa, N.; Canali, C.; Moscati, L. Plasmatic Profile of Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein (PAG) during Gestation and Postpartum in Sarda and Lacaune Sheep Determined with Two Radioimmunoassay Systems. Animals 2020, 10, 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091502

AMA Style

De Carolis M, Barbato O, Acuti G, Trabalza-Marinucci M, Melo de Sousa N, Canali C, Moscati L. Plasmatic Profile of Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein (PAG) during Gestation and Postpartum in Sarda and Lacaune Sheep Determined with Two Radioimmunoassay Systems. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091502

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Carolis, Martina, Olimpia Barbato, Gabriele Acuti, Massimo Trabalza-Marinucci, Noelita Melo de Sousa, Claudio Canali, and Livia Moscati. 2020. "Plasmatic Profile of Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein (PAG) during Gestation and Postpartum in Sarda and Lacaune Sheep Determined with Two Radioimmunoassay Systems" Animals 10, no. 9: 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091502

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop