Next Article in Journal
Physiological Stress Reactions in Red Deer Induced by Hunting Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of a Heating System Using a Ground Source Geothermal Heat Pump on Production Performance, Energy-Saving and Housing Environment of Pigs
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Dietary Protein Requirement for Juvenile Sesarmid Crab (Episesarma singaporense)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carbon Footprint of Mediterranean Pasture-Based Native Beef: Effects of Agronomic Practices and Pasture Management under Different Climate Change Scenarios
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants

1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(6), 1004; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004
Submission received: 12 May 2020 / Revised: 3 June 2020 / Accepted: 6 June 2020 / Published: 8 June 2020

Simple Summary

Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust national greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies of methane emissions. This review summarizes several common methane measurement techniques suitable for ruminant production and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. There is not a perfect technique for all situations. The appropriate technique depends on the objectives and resources available. Sophisticated techniques such as respiration chambers, sulphur hexafluoride tracer and ventilated hood are usually highly accurate but labor and time intensive. Simplified techniques such as GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser methane detector and portable accumulation chamber may be less accurate but are rapid with a high throughput. In general, an understanding of measurement mechanisms and the advantages and disadvantages with an appreciation of animal behavior and welfare is necessary for all techniques.

Abstract

To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH4) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH4 production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH4 measurement techniques. This review outlines various methods for measuring enteric CH4 emissions from ruminants such as respiration chambers (RC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer, GreenFeed, sniffer method, ventilated hood, facemask, laser CH4 detector and portable accumulation chamber. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed. In general, RC, SF6 and ventilated hood are capable of 24 h continuous measurements for each individual animal, providing accurate reference methods used for research and inventory purposes. However, they require high labor input, animal training and are time consuming. In contrast, short-term measurement techniques (i.e., GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser CH4 detector and portable accumulation chamber) contain additional variations in timing and frequency of measurements obtained relative to the 24 h feeding cycle. However, they are suitable for large-scale measurements under commercial conditions due to their simplicity and high throughput. Successful use of these techniques relies on optimal matching between the objectives of the studies and the mechanism of each method with consideration of animal behavior and welfare. This review can provide useful information in selecting suitable techniques for CH4 emission measurement in ruminants.
Keywords: greenhouse gas; methane; measurement technique; ruminants greenhouse gas; methane; measurement technique; ruminants

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Nan, X.; Yang, L.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, L.; Xiong, B. A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants. Animals 2020, 10, 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Nan X, Yang L, Zheng S, Jiang L, Xiong B. A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants. Animals. 2020; 10(6):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yiguang, Xuemei Nan, Liang Yang, Shanshan Zheng, Linshu Jiang, and Benhai Xiong. 2020. "A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants" Animals 10, no. 6: 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004

APA Style

Zhao, Y., Nan, X., Yang, L., Zheng, S., Jiang, L., & Xiong, B. (2020). A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants. Animals, 10(6), 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop