Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Efficiency of Antimicrobial Peptides against Staphylococcal Pathogens Associated with Canine Pyoderma
Next Article in Special Issue
A Genome-Wide Association Study for Calving Interval in Holstein Dairy Cows Using Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP Approach
Previous Article in Journal
MiRNAs and mRNAs Analysis during Abdominal Preadipocyte Differentiation in Chickens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reconstruction and Analysis of Cattle Metabolic Networks in Normal and Acidosis Rumen Tissue

1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz 6341773637, Iran
2
Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
3
School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416753955, Iran
4
Institute of Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(3), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030469
Submission received: 5 January 2020 / Revised: 21 February 2020 / Accepted: 27 February 2020 / Published: 11 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Farm Animal Gene Exploration)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Economics of feedlot beef production dictate that beef cattle must gain weight at their maximum potential rate; this involves getting them quickly onto a full feed of high fermentable diet which can induce the ruminal acidosis disease. The molecular host mechanisms that occur as a response to the acidosis, are mostly unknown. For answering this question, the rumen epithelial transcriptome in acidosis and control fattening steers were obtained. By RNA sequencing we found the different expression profiles of genes in normal and acidosis induced steers. Then we constructed two metabolic networks for normal and acidosis tissue based on gene expression profile. Our results suggest that rapid shifts to diets rich in fermentable carbohydrates cause an increased concentration of ruminal volatile fatty acids (VFA) and toxins and significant changes in transcriptome profiles and metabolites of rumen epithelial tissue, with negative effects on economic consequences of poor performance and animal health.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a system-level understanding of acidosis biology. Therefore, the genes expression differences between the normal and acidosis rumen epithelial tissues were first examined using the RNA-seq data in order to understand the molecular mechanisms involved in the disease and then their corresponding metabolic networks constructed. A number of 1074 genes, 978 isoforms, 1049 transcription start sites (TSS), 998 coding DNA sequence (CDS) and 2 promoters were identified being differentially expressed in the rumen tissue between the normal and acidosis samples (p < 0.05). The functional analysis of 627 up-regulated genes revealed their involvement in ion transmembrane transport, filament organization, regulation of cell adhesion, regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, ATP binding, glucose transmembrane transporter activity, carbohydrate binding, growth factor binding and cAMP metabolic process. Additionally, 111 differentially expressed enzymes were identified between the rumen epithelial tissue of the normal and acidosis steers with 46 up-regulated and 65 down-regulated ones in the acidosis group. The pathways and reactions analyses associated with the up-regulated enzymes indicate that most of these enzymes are involved in the fatty acid metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, pyruvate and carbon metabolism while most of the down-regulated ones are involved in purine and pyrimidine, vitamin B6 and antibiotics metabolisms. The degree distribution of both metabolic networks follows a power-law one, hence displaying a scale-free property. The top 15 hub metabolites were determined in the acidosis metabolic network with most of them involved in the fatty acid oxidation, VFA biosynthesis, amino acid biogenesis and glutathione metabolism which plays an important role in the stress condition. The limitations of this study were low number of animals and using only epithelial tissue (ventral sac) for RNA-seq.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In ruminant animals, such as cattle, healthy rumen plays an important role in production and economic efficiency. To meet the global demand for meat consumption, improving the production efficiency of cattle, would result in economic benefit. Economics of the feedlot meat production, dictates that cattle must gain weight at their maximum potential rate. This requires using intensive feeding strategies such as high energy as well as fermentable diets [1,2]. Economics also favor the processing of grain to increase the digestibility of starch. All of these factors set the stage for grain overload in the feedlot cattle and may induce digestive disorders leading to ruminal acidosis. The most common and primary form of ruminal acidosis in beef cattle fed high fermentable diets are thought to be lactic acidosis or acute acidosis [3,4]. Acute ruminal acidosis is often associated with an increase in lactic acid amount which yields pH depression and causes damage to the rumen epithelium as a consequence. Acidosis has a wide variety of clinical manifestations including the depressed feed intake, liver abscesses, diarrhea, inflammation and increases the morbidity and mortality of the stock [5,6,7].
The negative economic consequences resulted from the poor performance and animal health caused by acidosis, have made it one of the most prevalent animal welfare issues in the beef cattle industry. System level understanding of the bovine metabolism and relationship with their products is essential in cow breeding. However, several in vivo studies have demonstrated changes in some genes expression within the rumen tissue in response to the acidosis, but the functional and molecular host mechanisms are mostly unknown [8,9,10].
Systems biology is a field of biological science that aims to systematically study all the molecules and their interactions within an organism, tissue or living cell as a network. The metabolic network is a central area in systems biology and belongs to one of the best-studied biochemical networks [11]. The metabolic network is composed of small biomolecules (metabolites) and proteins (enzymes) that interact with them in order to catalyze a biochemical reaction. In fact, the goal of metabolic network reconstruction (MNR) is to identify the series metabolites involved in the biochemical reactions that define a cell metabolism [9].
Previous studies assayed gene expression changes in rumen epithelium under high grain concentration diets using microarray data or by PCR [3,4]. Li and coauthors studied the transcriptome changes in rumen tissue of young calves with feed induced acidosis using RNA-seq. Results from this study indicated that a starch-rich, diet-induced ruminal acidosis is accompanied by significant rumen epithelial transcriptome changes [7]. In this study we induced ruminal acidosis by feeding a starch-rich diet to beef cattle to analyze rumen epithelial tissue transcriptome. Furthermore, reconstruction of the metabolic networks of rumen epithelial tissue combined with systems biological analysis by implementing the advanced bioinformatics tools were carried out. The ventral sac of the rumen was chosen to assay changes as rumen is the first organ facing acidosis and the ventral sac has the highest capillary blood flow per unit weight mucosa of any location within the rumen [12]. The primary metabolic network in the bovine rumen tissue was reconstructed using the available bovine genome annotation and expression information. Moreover, acidosis network (subnetwork) reconstructed by mapping of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by rumen papillae tissue RNA-seq analysis with the primary network. Here we present a study that assays global transcriptional changes using RNA-seq based analysis that may contribute to enhance the understanding of ruminal acidosis. We hypothesize that the rumen tissue in acidosis cases has a more significant expression of genes involved in rapid structural changes to maintain hemostasis, nutrient absorption and energetic metabolism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection and Pretreatment

Available genome annotation and expression information of a bovine’s tissue-specific file was downloaded from the FTP site of the UniGene database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/repository/UniGene/) [13]. A total of 4159 genes expressed in the rumen tissue were selected from the downloaded files (Table S1). Each gene was then queried in the Uniprot database (http://www.ebi.uniprot.org/index.shtml) to verify whether it encodes an enzyme. At this step 654 enzyme encoding genes were detected. Since the ordinary organism-specific data have many errors and does not have complete enzymes and reaction information, the KEGG bovine’s pathway information files were not directly used for the metabolic network construction [14,15]. The enzyme commission (EC) number of each gene was obtained from Uniprot [16], and the corresponding reaction for each enzyme (all substrates and products) and other information were queried in the KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) and BRENDA (http://www.brenda-enzymes.org) databases and checked in Uniprot as well. Some genes coding the enzyme, such as endopeptidase, tryptase or protein disulfide isomerase have no definite reactions. Therefore, these enzymes were removed from the data set.
Ethical Approval: All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

2.2. Reconstruction and Topological Analysis of the Metabolic Networks

In order to complete the data set for MNR, several features of metabolites were considered. These features include the component names (metabolic description, KEGG, ChEBI and PubChem identifier), chemical formula and cellular compartment [2,17]. Metabolites names usually differ between databases and there is no universal identifier between them. For this reason, they are referred by their KEGG, ChEBI and PubChem ID. However, the formula of a metabolite used for matching metabolites, is not usable as a unique identifier. Two different metabolites aspects of function can have the same formula because there are various structures of atoms. The common small molecules (known as the currency metabolites such as ATP, NADH, H2O, CO2, etc.) were not removed from the network representation. A number of 15 compartments were assayed accounting for 1771 reactions and 1429 metabolites. The final form of data was converted into a Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) file format [18] in order to be visualized with Cytoscape software (vs. 3.6.1). For the acidosis model, we have used RNA-Seq data in order to perform a mapping into the normal model. Hence, the differentially expressed genes have been mapped into the normal network to build an acidosis state. Again, the final network has been created in the SBML file format. Some topological properties of the reconstructed networks have been also analyzed using Network Analyzer and cytoHubba plugins in Cytoscape [19,20]. The node degree distribution is one of the most critical topological parameters that gives the number of nodes with a degree (link) k (for k = 0, 1, …) that is defined as:
P(k) ~ k
where P(k) determines the variation in the nearest neighbors (degree distribution) and γ determines many properties of the system [13]. Real networks display a scale-free property therefore, the degree of a real network follows a power-law distribution. In the scale-free network most nodes have only a few links, but a few nodes (called hubs) have a very large number of links. P(k) for a scale-free network has no well-defined peak, and for large k it decays as a power-law P(k) ~ k appearing as a straight line with slope -γ on a log-log plot [21,22]. The shortest path length for nodes n and m define as L (n, m), which determines the number of edges that have to be crossed between n and m. For the whole network, the mean path length represents the average of the shortest paths among all pairs of nodes that is also known as the characteristic path length and offers the expected distance between n and m [20]. On the other hand, in this investigation, we first identified DEGs between control and acidosis tissue by rumen papillae tissue RNA-seq analysis and then these DEGs mapped to the primary network to construct the acidosis metabolic network (subnetwork) using bottleneck algorithm and double screening scheme.

2.3. Animal Management and Rumen Tissue Collection

Six Holstein steers (230 days old) born in spring 2015, were randomly divided into two groups (control and acidosis) and managed in the Agricultural resources farm of the University of Tehran. The high fermentable diet to induce acidosis was fed for 130 days being composed of 10.5% alfalfa hay, 14.5% corn silage, 34% barley grain, 23.3% corn grain ground, 9% soybean meal, 3% wheat bran, 2.5% rice bran and 3.2% supplement. The control diet was composed of 10.5% alfalfa hay, 14.5% corn silage, 34% barley grain, 5.3% corn grain ground, 9% soybean meal, 10.5% wheat bran, 6% rice bran, 5% sucrose, 2.5% fat powder and 3.2% supplement [3,8]. The final average body weight before slaughter for the acidosis and control groups was 529 ± 20 and 570 ± 10 kg, respectively. Clinical signs of acidosis were observed in all three animals. The ruminal pH was measured in the 1st, 30th and 129th days by manually inserting a pH probe into the rumen through a cannula and average data over 6 time-points in a single day (−8, −4, 0, 2, 4 and 8 h relative to grain feeding) (Table 1). After slaughter, for each sample, a 4 cm2 piece of rumen tissue was obtained from the central region of the ventral sac and rinsed with sterilized PBS buffer (pH = 6.8) before being placed in a 50 mL tube containing RNA later solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The samples were then stored at −80 °C until further processing. The ventral sac of the rumen was chosen as sampling site because it has the highest capillary blood flow per unit weight mucosa of any location within the rumen [12].

2.4. RNA Extraction, Quantification and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the tissue samples using Trizol Reagent kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA integrity of the total RNA samples was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Only samples with RNA integrity greater than 7 were subjected to RNA-seq library construction. Nanodrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) was used to measure the concentration and purity. RNA samples were stored at −80 °C until RNA-seq library preparation. RNA-sequencing library preparation was done using Illumina TruSeq ribo-zero gold kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, a cDNA library was generated from 100 ng of total RNA. mRNA was enriched by removing rRNA from the total RNA with Ribo-Zero TM Magnetic Kit. mRNA was fragmented into short fragments (about 200–700 bp), then positive-strand cDNA was synthesized by random hexamer primers using the fragments as templates. Buffer, dNTPS, RNase H and DNA polymerase I was added to synthesize the negative-strand cDNA. The double stranded cDNA was purified using the QiaQuick PCR extraction kit and then used for end-polishing. Sequencing adapters were ligated to fragments, then the second strand was degraded using UNG (Uracil-N-Glyosylase). The fragments were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and enriched by PCR amplification. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeqTM 2000 to obtain high quality, 100 bp paired-end reads.

2.5. Sequence Data Processing and Differential Gene Expression Analysis

The Tuxedo pipeline in the statistical environment R version 3.4.4, has been used for the RNA-seq data analysis. The pipeline consists of TopHat, [23] Cufflinks (v. 2.2.1) and cummeRbund (v. 3.4) software. Sequencing quality was assessed using FastQC (v. 0.11.2). The data were preprocessed using Trimmomatic (v.0.32) to filter out low-quality reads, remove adaptors and trim low-quality regions of reads with default parameters [24]. The transcriptome mapping and alignment of the reads to the bovine reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2) were performed using Bowtie2 (v. 2.0.1) and TopHat2 (v. 2.0.9) with default parameters, resulting into BAM format files [25]. Cufflinks was also used to assemble transcripts and estimate their abundance as Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM, cut-off ≥ 1), which normalizes transcript expression for transcript length and the total number of reads per sample. All assemblies were merged into a single transcriptome annotation using Cuffmerge (v. 2.2.1). Cuffdiff (v. 2.2.1.5), as a part of the Cufflinks package, was used to identify the differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05). The list of significant genes was further screened using PANTHER for further functional annotation. Results were visualized using the cummeRbund R library. Then the differentially expressed genes of this step of data analysis used for mapping and reconstruction of an acidosis metabolic network (subnetwork) using a bottleneck algorithm and double screening scheme. Bottleneck index calculates the number of shortest paths going through a certain node. Therefore, nodes with the highest bottleneck index, represent the critical points of the network. In addition, they could also control most of the information flow in the network [26].
The ssizeRNA package of R [27] was used with 71 million clean reads and 2 fold changes in average, the dispersion parameter for each gene equals 0.1 and 10 simulations. The result was 0.86 for the power of test and 0.04 for the false discovery rate.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Validation of Selected Differentially Expressed Genes

The expression of four randomly selected DEGs related to butyrate metabolism (OXCT1), the CoA biosynthesis pathway (DPYD), fatty acid oxidation (CPT1A), and the pantothenate biosynthesis pathway (FOXF1) was detected using RT-qPCR to confirm their differential expression between acidosis and control groups. Primers targeting four selected DEGs were designed using Primer-BLAST (NCBI, Bethesda, MD), Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The specificity of primers was checked with BLAST (NCBI) and the UCSC In-Silico PCR program (Table S2). The RT-qPCR reactions were performed with SYBR Green (Fast SYBR® Green Master Mix; Applied Biosystems) using StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the fast cycle and the following program: 20 s pre-denaturalization at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 3 s denaturation at 95 °C and 30 s annealing and extension at 60 °C. Gene expression values were normalized to the reference gene of β-actin in the same sample. The relative changes in each gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT (cycle threshold, CT) method.

3. Results

3.1. The Primary Metabolic Network

The primary network was a directed metabolic-centric network that reconstructed for 15 compartments including the cytoplasm, nucleus, cytosol, Golgi apparatus, mitochondrion, membrane protein, endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisome, plasma membrane, lysosome, extracellular exosome, cytoskeleton, cell membrane, extracellular exosome and mitochondrial membrane. The network includes 1429 metabolites as the nodes and 535 genes catalyzing 1771 relevant reactions as the edges. The topological network parameters of the primary metabolic network are listed in Table 2. The network data file is attached to Table S3.
Node degree distribution of the primary network is plotted in Figure 1. The degree distribution of a real network follows a power-law distribution. In the present study, the correlation coefficient (R) is 0.91 (p < 0.0001), and γ is taken as 0.89. The small value of γ implies that the role of the hub nodes is more important in the network. In the networks with a power-law degree distribution, the majority of the nodes have only one or two neighbors while coexisting with many nodes with hundreds and some even with thousands of neighbors. For these networks there exists no typical node, and they are therefore often referred to as scale-free. Unlike exponential networks, scale-free networks are extremely heterogeneous, with their topology being dominated by a few highly connected nodes (hubs) which link the rest of the less connected nodes to the system. In this respect the emergence of power-law distribution is intimately linked to the growth of the network in which new nodes are preferentially attached to already established nodes, a property that is also thought to characterize the evolution of biological systems. Our results convincingly indicate the probability that a given substrate participates in k reactions follows a power-law distribution; in other words, metabolic networks belong to the class of scale-free networks. The shortest path length is one of the most critical topological parameters, also called the distance between two nodes [20]. The average path length in the present reconstruction is equal to 13.142. Radrich et al. (2010) demonstrated the value of the average path length becomes significantly higher when common small molecules are removed from the network [28]. The network diameter is the largest distance between the two nodes whose value in the present network is as long as 38. The results of the centrality analysis using cytoHubba plugin, have been provided in Ma and Zeng (2003) [17]. As it was expected, the top 20 nodes are the currency metabolites usually found in all metabolic networks. Removing the currency metabolites, the top 15 nodes with the highest degree centrality indexes are presented in Table 3.
Since the existing network is scale-free and hubs play a significant role in maintaining the network and system biology of the rumen epithelium tissue, assays were conducted to identify their functions [13]. The centralization for the present network is estimated as 0.119 which is given by n/(n-2) (max(k)/(n-1)- Density. Centralization is a measure of how a network is focused around central nodes or assesses if a network has star-like topology. This value is close to 0 for a decentralized network and approaches 1 for the network resembling a star. The value of heterogeneity (defined as the coefficient of variance of the connectivity) in our network is close to 0.862 which indicates that some metabolites are highly connected and most of them have a lesser number of connections.

3.2. Transcriptome Profiling of the Rumen Epithelium

The average of clean reads (after removing adaptor sequence and low-quality reads) was 71 million reads with an average of 70,975,460 ± 272,875 reads in normal samples and 71,142,189 ± 474,023 reads in the acidosis samples. The average of Q20 and GC percent were 97.96% and 50.87%, respectively (Table S4). The total number of expressed genes (genes with at least one read in every sample) for the rumen tissue was 24,494, and the overall read alignment rate to the bovine reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2) was evaluated as 87% ± 3.43%. A number of 1074 DEGs were identified in the rumen tissue between the normal and acidosis samples using the FDR-corrected p-value with a significance level of α =0.05 (Table S5). Then, DEGs mapped to the primary network to reconstruct the acidosis metabolic network. Further validation of the differential expression using reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) showed that the expression of OXCT1, DPYD, CPT1A and FOXF1 was consistent as detected with the RNA-seq data (Table S2). Additionally, we identified 978 isoforms (up-regulate: 584, down-regulate: 394), 1049 transcription start sites (TSS) (635 up-regulated and 414 down-regulated), coding DNA sequence (CDS) (607 up-regulated and 391 down-regulated) and 2 promoters (up-regulated) have differentially expressed in the rumen tissue between the normal and acidosis samples. Of the differentially expressed genes (DE), 627 were up-regulated, and 447 were down-regulated in acidosis. The functional analysis using PANTHER [29], indicated that the down-regulated genes control the biological processes such as; Biological regulation (GO: 0065007), Cellular process (GO: 0009987), Localization (GO: 0051179), Locomotion (GO: 0040011), Metabolic process (GO: 0008152), Multicellular organismal process (GO: 0032501), Response to stimulus (GO: 0050896). Conversely, PANTHER analysis for the up-regulated genes, illustrated that these genes involved in the biological adhesion (GO: 0022610), Biological regulation (GO: 065007), Cellular component organization (GO: 0071840), Developmental process (GO: 0032502), Immune system process (GO: 0002376), Multicellular organismal process (GO: 0032501), and Reproduction (GO: 0000003) (Table S6). There were 111 enzymes identified which presented significant changes in the expression under the acidosis condition among which, 46 enzymes were up-regulated and the remaining 65 down-regulated. The most significant up-regulated and down-regulated enzymes are presented in Table 4 and Table 5. The PCA and volcano plots depict the global gene expression dynamics between the rumen epithelia of normal and acidosis steers. Figure 2A shows a volcano plot of the present data, depicting -log10 p-values over log2fold changes. The significantly differentially expressed genes are illustrated as red dots. The PCA plot (Figure 2C) shows that the gene expression profiles of the normal and acidosis tissues fall into distinct clusters. The result of cufflinks is converted to the InteractiVenn plot in order to identify the similarities and different genes expression between each sample group individually (Figure 2B).

3.3. Acidosis Metabolic Network

The acidosis metabolic network (as a subnetwork) based on the bottleneck and double screening scheme methods reconstruction which included 832 metabolites and 1021 reactions (Table S7). Node degree distribution of the network is plotted in Figure 3 and the topological network parameters are given in Table 6. The top 15 hubs identified by the bottleneck (BN) algorithm and double screening scheme (DSS) methods are shown in Table 7. Figure 4 depicts the graphical acidosis metabolic network representation. The search results in the KEGG pathway clarified that stearoyl-CoA, 2-oxoglutarate and lactate are intermediates in the fatty acid metabolism pathway (map01212), citrate cycle (map00020) and glycolysis (map00010), respectively and acetyl-CoA is a metabolite linking between the citrate cycle, fatty acid pathway and glycolysis.
To reconstruct the metabolic networks, we used a graph theory- based method that metabolites correspond to the nodes and reactions correspond to the edges as a metabolite-centric network. The existing networks were undirected because all the reactions were reversible and reconstructed for 15 compartments that most of the hub metabolites were in mitochondrion, cytoplasm, and nucleus. The small-world property, is one of the most critical real network properties. The networks with this property have a characteristic feature of regional specialization and relatively efficient information transfer [30]. This property characterized by a diameter network, which is defined as the average minimum path length between all pairs of nodes. The value of the diameter in the primary and subnetwork were 38 and 28, respectively. Embar et al (2016) reported the path length is of biological interest because it is assumed that a functionally related gene would be more closely connected in the metabolome in a gene network [31]. The average path length presents a measure of the network’s overall navigability and it is assumed that functionally related genes would be more closely connected in the metabolome that the value in the primary and subnetwork which were equal to 13.142 and 6.913, respectively. Zhang et al. (2005) demonstrated that the diameter in all 13 real networks examined (biological, social, technological and linguistic), is higher than the random expectation [32]. Ma and Zeng (2003) revealed that the average path length and diameter have greater value in eukaryotes (9.75 and 33.1) than bacteria (7.23 and 20.6) [17]. Our results of topological analysis networks showed these two crucial parameters were nearer to the values of eukaryotes and far off bacteria.

4. Discussion

The profound understanding of the bovine rumen epithelium metabolism and changes during the ruminal acidosis have a tangible effect on cow breeding and provide crucial biological information. Ruminal acidosis is one of the most important disorders and production problems in the beef industry occurred by low ruminal pH in the range of 5.2 and 6 for a prolonged period [5]. Ruminal pH depends on the Henderson-Hasselbach balance that is defined as [9]:
pH = pKa + log [(acid) (H acid)−1]
During the microbial ruminal fermentation, the population of microorganisms (bacteria, ciliate protozoa, anaerobic fungi and bacteriophages) ferments the carbohydrates and protein to the short-term intermediates such as sugars and amino acids [9]. The products of this initial degradation are metabolized to produce energy, methane, carbon dioxide, heat and volatile fatty acids (VFA). At the physiological pH of rumen fluid, 90–99% of the acid is in the dissociated form as a base conjugate (VFA-) and H+ that are absorbed through the rumen wall [33].
When cattle are fed with a high level of rapidly digestible carbohydrate to gain weight at their maximum level, VFA production exceeds the rumen acids absorption capacity which causes accumulated VFA and dropping ruminal pH. Lactic acid has a lower pKa (3.80) than other VFA, and its concentration is low during the ruminal acidosis. However, as the pH drops below 5.7, the rate of lactic acid formation exceeds the absorption capacity which causes a drastic decrease in pH value [34]. If this condition continues, the lactic acid entry into the blood system causes a big challenge in metabolism, changes the population of microorganisms, rumen motility, and the systemic body fluid balance. Recent management practices strive to minimize the ruminal acidosis occurrence, but the need for a better understanding of the disease’s etiology, prevention and treatment are still felt [5,6].
The main goal of this study was the development of a system-level understanding of biological changes in rumen tissue under acidosis. For this purpose, the focus has been on the reconstruction of a bovine rumen tissue-specific network using the transcriptome data of bovines with and without acidosis in order to compare the acidosis-related metabolites and reactions based on the network topology. Studies conducted on the acidosis using the metabolic network method can provide new information about it through the identification of the novel metabolic function and metabolite biomarkers. Because a change in the concentration of one metabolite, leads to the change of several cascade reaction pathways that may yield the diverse phenotypes and disorders [35].
Of a total of 1074 DEGs, 111 genes encoded an enzyme. The analysis of pathway and reaction associated with up-regulated enzymes, indicated that most of these enzymes are involved in 3 central metabolic pathways including the fatty acid metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, pyruvate and carbon metabolism (Table 8). The map profiling results showed the significant up expression of the OXCT1 gene encoding succinyl-CoA transferase (2.8.3.5) under the acidosis. This enzyme takes part in butyrate metabolism within the mitochondrion and also the nucleus in order to produce butyrate as the microbial ferment product of a high starch diet and as one of the important substrates in the ruminant energy metabolism. Hernández et al. (2014) reported a significant increase in the rumen VFA concentration (150–225 mM) of the caws under ruminal acidosis [6]. Previous studies have reported that in acidosis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) derived from the rumen down-regulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 expression (SCD1) and demonstrated up-regulation of the genes involved fatty acid β-oxidation [10]. The present results of the gene expression profile assay indicated the obvious pattern as up-regulation of the genes CPT1A, ALDH9A1and TSPAN12, associated with the fatty acid oxidation and down-regulation of SCD (stearoyl-CoA 9-desaturase) in the acidosis group.
The SCD enzyme is responsible for forming a double bond in Stearoyl-CoA and plays an important role in fatty acid biosynthesis, regulating the genes expression which is involved in the lipogenesis and also regulating the mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation [36]. Stearoyl-CoA is a long-chain acyl CoA ester that acts as an intermediate metabolite in the biosynthesis of the monounsaturated fatty acids. This oxidative reaction is catalyzed by the iron-containing, microsomal enzyme and SCD. NADH supplies the reducing equivalents for the reaction, the flavoprotein is cytochrome b5-reductase and the electron carrier is the heme protein cytochrome b5. The result of analysis using cytoHubba plugin show Stearoyl-CoA (C00412) and ferrocytochrome b5 (C00996) are hub metabolites in the subnetwork. Hubs in scale-free networks have a key biological role and significant effect in maintaining the network [13]. For this reason, improving the bovine acidosis researches seem to be useful. PDK2 (5.3.99.4), PTGDS (5.3.99.2), and TNS2 (1.11.1.9) take part in the arachidonic acid metabolism, whilst PLA2G4A (3.1.1.4) and TSPAN12 (1.14.14.1) participate in both arachidonic (ec00590) and linoleic acid (ec00591) metabolisms. Linoleic (18:2 Δ9, 12) and arachidonic acids (20:4 Δ5, 8, 11, 14) are essential long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) and a type of linoleic acid (ω-6) can be converted to the arachidonic one [37]. In addition, both of them have important biological functions as a component of phospholipid membranes and arachidonic acid is also present in cell membranes of erythrocytes, neutrophils and monocytes.
The analysis results of the DEGs illustrated significant high expression of FOXF1 (2.6.1.42) and DPYD (1.3.1.2) involved in the Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis pathway (ec00770). Pantothenate (vitamin B5) is the key precursor for the biosynthesis of coenzyme A [36]. This vitamin is a carrier protein, having a phosphopantetheine group that shuttles intermediates between the active sites of enzymes involved in the fatty acid and non-ribosomal peptide synthesis. Additionally, the results of the sub-network analysis showed that acetyl-CoA (C00024) and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (C00019) cytoplasmic are hub metabolites. The conversion of pyruvate into acetyl-CoA is a crucial step in the carbon energy metabolism that occurs by pyruvate formate-lyase (PFL; 2.3.1.54) or pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFO;1.2.7.1). Pyruvate formate-lyase comprises two cofactors of S-adenosyl methionine and thiamine diphosphate. The pathways results indicated that the biosynthesis of amino acids in the ruminal acidosis increases which might lead to the increased rumen pyruvate and VFA content in the acidosis condition [38]. In the rumen metabolism pyruvate and isobutyrate for valine, acetate for serine, propionate for arginine and histidine, butanoic acid for leucine and 2-methyl butyrate for isoleucine are the main substrates and precursors for the biogenesis of these amino acids. The result of GC–MS analysis by Xue et al. (2018) showed that the SARA-inducing diet significantly increases the propionate, pyruvate, lactate, glycine and valine contents in the rumen of dairy cows compare to the control one [10]. The results of pathways analysis indicated that TNS2 (glutathione peroxidase; 1.11.1.9) and GSTM3 (glutathione transferase; 2.5.1.18) participate in the glutathione metabolism (ec00480) and glutathione (C00051) was identified here as a hub metabolite in the subnetwork. Glutathione is a non-protein thiol for protecting cells against the oxidative stress condition via detoxification of the oxygen-derived free radicals using glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and transferase enzymes [39]. These enzymes are antioxidants and play an important role in stress conditions such as immune and inflammatory response. Xue et al. (2018) detected significant differences in the glutathione metabolism of bovine rumen tissue between the control and SARA groups [10]. Also, Jiang et al. (2014) reported that glutathione transferase is significantly up-regulated in the goat liver tissue of the SARA group compared to the control one [8].
The pathway analysis of the down-regulated enzymes showed that most of these enzymes are involved in the purine and pyrimidine, vitamin B6 and biosynthesis of the antibiotic’s metabolisms. Purine and pyrimidine are basic components of DNA and RNA in all living cells that participate in the wide range of biological processes. Purine and pyrimidine metabolism include the synthesis and degradation of these components with deferent enzymes and metabolites [40]. ADA (3.5.4.4: adenosine deaminase), PNP (2.4.2.1: purine-nucleoside phosphorylase) and ENPP4 (3.6.1.29: bis(5′-adenosyl)-triphosphatase) are involved in the purine metabolism pathway (ec00230). Also, UPP1 (2.4.2.3: uridine phosphorylase) and CTPS1 (6.3.4.2: CTP synthase) are involved in the pyrimidine metabolism pathway (ec00240). With the reduced expression of these enzymes, the appropriate substrates and other alternative products are accumulated (dATP and dGTP) and this leads to the toxic effects on the cells of the immune system. Cytidine triphosphate synthase (CTPS) catalyzes the last step in the pyrimidine biosynthesis which is the irreversible reaction of the converted uridine triphosphate (UTP) into CTP with the glutamine and ATP consumption. The results of the enzymes pathway analysis showed that the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of antibiotics (ec01130) including ISYNA1 (5.5.1.4), SDS (4.3.1.17), ODC1 (4.1.1.17), ARG1 (3.5.3.1), PSPH (3.1.3.3), PSAT1 (2.6.1.52), TALDO1 (2.2.1.2), MTHFD2 (1.5.1.15) and PGD (1.1.1.44), have been down-regulated significantly. Antibiotics, one of the secondary metabolites, encompass a broad group of chemical compounds produced by fungi, bacteria and other organisms with a different molecular target. They have a wide range of functions that can selectively destroy or inhibit the growth of other microorganisms [41]. Sodium monensin is a polyether antibiotic produced by Streptomyces cinnamonensis which acts by inhibiting the growth of Streptococcus bovis (and other major lactic acid-producing strains except for Selenomonas) and leads to the lactate production decrement and rumen pH increment.
The pathways analysis results further indicated the down-regulation of PDXK (2.7.1.35: pyridoxal kinase) and PSAT1 (2.6.1.52: aspartate transaminase) was involved in vitamin B6 metabolism. Beef meat is a major source of B6, B12 Thiamin, Riboflavin and Niacin vitamins. Vitamin B6 is part of the vitamin B group and pyridoxal phosphate is the coenzyme form of this vitamin participating in the reactions related to the amino acid, glucose and lipid metabolism. Pyridoxal kinase (pdxK) is an essential enzyme in the terminal point of the vitamin B6 pathway which causes phosphorylation of pyridoxal to produce pyridoxal phosphate; therefore, a decreased expression of pdxK leads to vitamin B6 deficiency. Vitamin B6 deficiency causes impair weight gain, anorexia, and diarrhea which are some outward signs of an acidosis disorder.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study gave a new comprehensive insight into the ruminal acidosis metabolic network. Transcriptome profiling and multivariate analysis were used to provide the metabolic network data of 6 rumen tissue Holstein cattle fed with normal and induced acidosis diets. As a first step, the normal metabolic network in the bovine rumen tissue was reconstructed using the available bovine genome annotation and expression information and then the differentially expressed genes of RNA-seq data analysis were used for mapping and reconstruction of an acidosis network. We identified the change in genes, enzymes and hub metabolites associated with acidosis in the rumen. With rapid shifts in the use of rich diets in fermentable carbohydrates, significant changes were found in the transcriptome profiles of the rumen epithelial tissue. The PCA of rumen data showed that acidosis samples are clustered closer to each other and separated from the control samples. Analysis of the pathways and reactions associated with up-regulated enzymes, showed that most of these enzymes are involved in the fatty acid metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, pyruvate and carbon metabolism. Additionally, most of the down-regulated enzymes are involved in the purine and pyrimidine, vitamin B6 and antibiotics metabolisms. The top 15 hub metabolites were determined in the acidosis network from which stearoyl-CoA and ferrocytochrome b5 are involved in the fatty acid oxidation, acetyl-CoA and S-adenosyl-L-methionine cytoplasmic in VFA biosynthesis, L-serine and L-arginine in amino acids biogenesis and glutathione in glutathione metabolism that play an important role in the stress condition such as the immune and inflammatory response. The network’s distribution degree follows a power-law distribution hence displays a scale-free property. The values of diameter and average path length in this network were 28 and 6.913, respectively, indicating that the present network has small world property.
The achievements of the present study indicate that the use of a high grain diet could elicit a substantial change in the gene expression and transcriptome response in the ruminal tissue. Furthermore, the present results provide a fundamental understanding of which genes are associated with acidosis and may lead to the identification of a biomarker for selecting the best cows for animal breeding. Although significant genes were analyzed and known metabolic data collected from the different databases reconstructed the metabolic network, many factors such as CDS, promoter, TSS and isoform might affect the better interpretation and results of the system biology investigation. The limitations of this study were a low number of animals and using only epithelial tissue (ventral sac) for RNA-seq. Assaying liver and lung tissues are also suggested in order to provide more detailed information on the effects of acidosis on fattening steers.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/3/469/s1 file, Table S1: Total of genes expressed in the rumen tissue (UniGene database). Table S2: Fold change, Gene name, primer sequences and product length of qRT-PCR validated genes. Table S3: Primary metabolic network data. Table S4: Statical result of RNA-Seq data analysis. Table S5: The result of detected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with the RNA-seq data analysis using Tuxedo package. Table S6: Enrichment analysis using KEGG, SP_PIR and GO. Reported p-values was corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID with default parameters. Table S7: Acidosis metabolic network data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F. and M.G.; Methodology, M.G., J.F. and Y.A.; Software, M.G. and L.K.; Validation, L.K.; Formal Analysis, M.G. and L.K.; Investigation, M.G. and H.Z.; Resources, H.Z., M.G., J.F.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.G. and J.F.; Writing-Review & Editing, M.G. and J.F.; Supervision, J.F.; Project Administration, J.F., M.G.; Funding Acquisition, J.F., H.Z., Y.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan (student grant No. 9324203). Yazdan Asgari was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS); grant No. 98-01-159-41531 during this study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mohsen Sari, Mehdi Dehghan and Javad Khalifeh for their help and advice in animal raring period and sample preparation. We acknowledge Research deputy of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that no competing interest exists.

References

  1. Cottle, D.; Kahn, L. Beef Cattle Production and Trade; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton, Australia, 2014; p. 221. [Google Scholar]
  2. Degtyarenko, K.; de Matos, P.; Ennis, M.; Hastings, J.; Zbinden, M.; McNaught, A.; Alcántara, R.; Darsow, M.; Guedj, M.; Ashburner, M. ChEBI: A database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D344–D350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Steele, M.A.; Croom, J.; Kahler, M.; AlZahal, O.; Hook, S.E.; Plaizier, K.; McBride, B.W. Bovine rumen epithelium undergoes rapid structural adaptations during grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011, 300, R1515–R1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Steele, M.A.; Vandervoort, G.; AlZahal, O.; Hook, S.E.; Matthews, J.C.; McBride, B.W. Rumen epithelial adaptation to high-grain diets involves the coordinated regulation of genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis. Physiol. Genomics 2011, 43, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Enemark, J.M. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hernández, J.; Benedito, J.L.; Abuelo, A.; Castillo, C. Ruminal acidosis in feedlot: From aetiology to prevention. Sci. World J. 2014, 702572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, W.; Gelsinger, S.; Edwards, A.; Riehle, C.; Koch, D. Transcriptome analysis of rumen epithelium and meta-transcriptome analysis of rumen epimural microbial community in young calves with feed induced acidosis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, X.Y.; Ni, Y.D.; Zhang, S.K.; Zhang, Y.S.; Shen, X.Z. Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Liver in Response to Subacute Ruminal Acidosis (SARA) Induced by High-concentrate Diet. Asian Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kleen, J.L.; Hooijer, G.A.; Rehage, J.; Noordhuizen, J.P. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review. J. Vet. Med. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2003, 50, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xue, F.; Pan, X.; Jiang, L.; Guo, Y.; Xiong, B. GC-MS analysis of the ruminal metabolome response to thiamine supplementation during high grain feeding in dairy cows. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bruggeman, F.J.; Westerhoff, H.V. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. O’Shea, E.; Waters, S.M.; Keogh, K.; Kelly, A.K.; Kenny, D.A. Examination of the molecular control of ruminal epithelial function in response to dietary restriction and subsequent compensatory growth in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Ju, Z.; Zhai, R.; Zhou, L.; Li, Q.; Li, J.; Li, R.; Huang, J.; Zhong, J. Reconstruction of metabolic network in the bovine mammary gland tissue. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 7311–7318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Poolman, M.G.; Bonde, B.K.; Gevorgyan, A.; Patel, H.H.; Fell, D.A. Challenges to be faced in the reconstruction of metabolic networks from public databases. Syst. Biol. 2006, 153, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stein, S.E.; Heller, S.R.; Tchekhovskoi, D. An open standard for chemical structure representation: The IUPAC chemical identifier. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Chemical Information Conference, Nimes, France, 1 October 2003; pp. 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma, H.; Zeng, A. Reconstruction of metabolic networks from genome data and analysis of their global structure for various organisms. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bornstein, B.J.; Keating, S.M.; Jouraku, A.; Hucka, M. LibSBML: An API library for SBML. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 880–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cline, M.S.; Smoot, M.; Cerami, E.; Kuchinsky, A.; Landys, N.; Workman, C.; Christmas, R.; Avila-Campilo, I.; Creech, M.; Gross, B.; et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2366–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Managbanag, J.R.; Witten, T.M.; Bonchev, D.; Fox, L.A.; Tsuchiya, M.; Kennedy, B.K.; Kaeberlein, M. Shortest-path network analysis is a useful approach toward identifying genetic determinants of longevity. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Erdös, P.; Rényi, A. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. 1959, 6, 290–297. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeong, H.; Tombor, B.; Albert, R.; Oltvai, Z.N.; Barabási, A.L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Trapnell, C.; Pimentel, H.; Kelley, R.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Yu, H.; Kim, P.M.; Sprecher, E.; Trifonov, V.; Gerstein, M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: Correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bi, R.; Liu, P. Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments. BMC Bioinform. 2016, 17, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Radrich, K.; Tsuruoka, Y.; Dobson, P.; Gevorgyan, A.; Swainston, N.; Baart, G.; Schwartz, J.M. Integration of metabolic databases for the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kong, R.S.; Liang, G.; Chen, Y.; Stothard, P.; Guan le, L. Transcriptome profiling of the rumen epithelium of beef cattle differing in residual feed intake. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Telesford, Q.K.; Joyce, K.E.; Hayasaka, S.; Burdette, J.H.; Laurienti, P.J. The ubiquity of small-world networks. Brain Connect. 2011, 1, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Embar, V.; Handen, A.; Ganapathiraju, M.K. Is the average shortest path length of gene set a reflection of their biological relatedness? J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2016, 14, 1660002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, P.; Foerster, H.; Tissier, C.P.; Mueller, L.; Paley, S.; Karp, P.D.; Rhee, S.Y. MetaCyc and AraCyc. Metabolic pathway databases for plant research. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bergman, E.N. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol. Rev. 1990, 70, 567–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ash, R.; Baird, G.D. Activation of volatile fatty acids in bovine liver and rumen epithelium. Biochem. J. 1973, 136, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Braun, P.; Rietman, E.; Vidal, M. Networking metabolites and diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9849–9850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Leonardi, R.; Jackowski, S. Biosynthesis of Pantothenic Acid and Coenzyme A. EcoSal Plus 2007, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Artegoitia, V.M.; Foote, A.P.; Lewis, R.M.; Freetly, H.C. Rumen Fluid Metabolomics Analysis Associated with Feed Efficiency on Crossbred Steers. Sci. Rep. 2017, 6, 2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Atteia, A.; van Lis, R.; Gelius-Dietrich, G.; Adrait, A.; Garin, J.; Joyard, J.; Rolland, N.; Martin, W. Pyruvate formate-lyase and a novel route of eukaryotic ATP synthesis in Chlamydomonas mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 9909–9918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Abd Ellah, M.R.; Okada, K.; Yasuda, J. Oxidative stress and bovine liver diseases: Role of glutathione peroxidase and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2007, 54, 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  40. Moffatt, B.A.; Ashihara, H. Purine and pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and metabolism. Arab. Book 2002, 1, e0018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Clardy, J.; Fischbach, M.A.; Currie, C.R. The natural history of antibiotics. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, R437–R441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Topological properties of the reconstructed network for healthy ruminal epithelium. Node degree distribution.
Figure 1. Topological properties of the reconstructed network for healthy ruminal epithelium. Node degree distribution.
Animals 10 00469 g001
Figure 2. (A) Volcano plot is representing the relationship between fold-change and significance. Red points identified differentially expressed genes between control and acidosis samples. We identified 1074 differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05), of which 627 were up-regulated and 447 genes were down-regulated in the acidosis group. (B) InteractiVenn plot to identify similarities and different gene expressions between each sample (control samples: C_0, C_1, C_2 and acidosis samples: A_0, A_1, A_2). (C) PCA plot shows that gene expression profiles of normal and acidosis tissue fall into distinct clusters.
Figure 2. (A) Volcano plot is representing the relationship between fold-change and significance. Red points identified differentially expressed genes between control and acidosis samples. We identified 1074 differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05), of which 627 were up-regulated and 447 genes were down-regulated in the acidosis group. (B) InteractiVenn plot to identify similarities and different gene expressions between each sample (control samples: C_0, C_1, C_2 and acidosis samples: A_0, A_1, A_2). (C) PCA plot shows that gene expression profiles of normal and acidosis tissue fall into distinct clusters.
Animals 10 00469 g002
Figure 3. Node degree distribution of reconstructed metabolic network for acidosis ruminal epithelium.
Figure 3. Node degree distribution of reconstructed metabolic network for acidosis ruminal epithelium.
Animals 10 00469 g003
Figure 4. The reconstructed acidosis metabolic network for bovine.
Figure 4. The reconstructed acidosis metabolic network for bovine.
Animals 10 00469 g004
Table 1. Ruminal pH of normal and acidosis groups.
Table 1. Ruminal pH of normal and acidosis groups.
GroupThe 1st Day The 30th Day The 129th Day
control5.71; 5.89; 5.885.57; 5.97; 5.876.03; 6.17; 6.0
acidosis5.95; 5.23; 5.645.97; 5.17; 5.575.19; 5.10; 5.24
‡ Each value represents the average pH of one animal.
Table 2. General properties of the constructed network.
Table 2. General properties of the constructed network.
ParametersValues
Number of nodes1429
Number of edges1771
Network density0.002
Network heterogeneity0.862
Number of self-loops0
Network diameter38
Network centralization0.019
Average path length13.142
Average number of neighbors 2.476
Table 3. Top 15 hub metabolites of the metabolic network of bovine rumen tissue.
Table 3. Top 15 hub metabolites of the metabolic network of bovine rumen tissue.
MetabolitesNeutral FormulaKeggIDPubChemIDCompartment
CoAC21H36N7O16P3SC0001049600643Mitochondrion
glutathioneC10H17N3O6SC00051 3353Cytoplasm
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteineC14H20N6O5SC00021439155Nucleus
S-adenosyl-L-methionineC15H22N6O5SC0001934755Nucleus
2-oxoglutarateC5H6O5C000263328Mitochondrion
Acetyl-CoAC23H38N7O17P3SC000243326Cytoplasm
D-fructose_6-phosphateC6H13O9PC00085 3385Cytoplasm
ubiquinoneC19H26O4C003995280346Mitochondrion
formateCH2O2C00058 3358Mitochondrion
electron-transferring flavoproteinC27H30N9O15P2C042536918Mitochondrion
L-tryptophanC11H12N2O2C000783378Cytoplasm
pyruvateC3H4O3C000223324Mitochondrion
L-tyrosineC9H11NO3C000823382Cytoplasm
tetrahydrofolateC19H23N7O6C001013401Mitochondrion
L-serineC3H7NO3C000653365Nucleus
Table 4. The top up-regulated enzyme in the bovine rumen tissue under acidosis condition.
Table 4. The top up-regulated enzyme in the bovine rumen tissue under acidosis condition.
GeneEC NumberEnzyme NameReactionP-Value
HSPA64.2.1.134very-long-chain (3R)-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrataseR108275.00E-05
GUCY1B14.6.1.2guanylate cyclaseR004340.0001
PDK25.3.99.4prostacyclin synthaseR022670.0019
PTGDS5.3.99.2prostaglandin-D synthaseR022660.0021
OXCT12.8.3.5succinyl-CoA transferaseR017800.0002
SLC24A33.1.1.34lipoprotein lipaseR013690.0001
PLA2G4A3.1.1.4phospholipase A2R013130.004
PDE5A3.1.4.35cGMP phosphodiesteraseR012345.00E-05
CYP2W13.1.4.17cyclic 3′,5′-phosphodiesteraseR032590.00085
PLCD33.1.4.11Phosphorinositidase CR034350.00355
EPHX13.3.2.9microsomal epoxide hydrolaseR076270.00085
DYSF3.6.1.5ATP-diphosphataseR104435.00E-05
GSTM32.5.1.18glutathione transferaseR035220.0003
FOXF12.6.1.42branched-chain-amino-acid transaminaseR010900.0002
PFKM2.7.1.116-phosphofructokinaseR007560.0015
CHPT12.7.8.2diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferaseR013210.0012
CDS22.7.7.41phosphatidate cytidylyl transferaseR017990.00215
MMP162.7.7.40CDP ribitol pyro phosphorylaseR029210.0027
CEP1122.7.12.2MAP kinase kinaseR001620.0014
CHRNA31.14.13.39nitric-oxide synthase (NADPH)R005575.00E-05
TNS21.11.1.9glutathione peroxidaseR002740.0018
TSPAN121.14.14.1flavoprotein monooxygenaseR041225.00E-05
DPYD1.3.1.2dihydrouracil dehydrogenase (NADP+)R009785.00E-05
ALDH9A11.2.1.3aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+)R005380.0001
AOC31.4.3.21primary-amine oxidaseR018530.0001
SOX51.4.3.1D-aspartate oxidaseR003595.00E-05
MAOB1.4.3.4monoamine oxidaseR113545.00E-05
CILP1.7.1.7GMP reductaseR011345.00E-05
AASS1.5.1.8lysine-2-oxoglutarate reductaseR007165.00E-05
MTHFR1.5.1.20methylenetetrahydrofolateR012245.00E-05
GATM2.1.4.1glycine amidino transferaseR005650.00015
SCN7A2.1.1.43N-methyltransferaseR039385.00E-05
CPT1A2.3.1.21Palmitoyl carnitine transferaseR019235.00E-05
Table 5. The top down-regulated enzyme in the bovine rumen tissue under acidosis condition.
Table 5. The top down-regulated enzyme in the bovine rumen tissue under acidosis condition.
GeneEC NumberEnzyme NameReactionP-Value
ASNS6.3.5.4asparagine synthaseR005785.00E-05
CTPS16.3.4.2CTP synthaseR005735.00E-05
TARS6.1.1.3threonyl-tRNA synthetaseR036630.00095
WARS6.1.1.2tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetaseR036640.0013
YARS6.1.1.1tyrosine-tRNA ligaseR029180.0003
ISYNA15.5.1.4inositol-3-phosphate synthaseR073240.0005
CTH4.4.1.1cystathionine gamma-lyaseR010015.00E-05
SDS4.3.1.17L-serine ammonia-lyaseR002205.00E-05
CA34.2.1.1carbonate dehydrataseR001320.00075
ODC14.1.1.17ornithine decarboxylaseR006705.00E-05
ENPP43.6.1.29bis(5′-adenosyl)-triphosphataseR001870.0019
PPA13.6.1.1inorganic diphosphataseR000040.0001
ADA3.5.4.4adenosine deaminaseR015605.00E-05
ARG13.5.3.1arginaseR005515.00E-05
GGH3.4.19.9folate gamma-glutamyl hydrolaseR042420.0033
PSPH3.1.3.3phosphoserine phosphataseR005820.0003
PRDX63.1.1.4phospholipase A2R013130.00115
ABHD123.1.1.23acyl glycerol lipaseR013510.0003
PDXK2.7.1.35pyridoxal kinaseR001740.0034
GK2.7.1.30glycerol kinaseR008475.00E-05
PSAT12.6.1.52phosphoserine transaminaseR041735.00E-05
GOT22.6.1.1aspartate transaminaseR003550.0009
UPP12.4.2.3uridine phosphorylaseR018765.00E-05
PNP2.4.2.1purine-nucleoside phosphorylaseR083680.00295
C1GALT12.4.1.122D-galactosyltransferaseR059085.00E-05
DGAT22.3.1.20diglyceride acyltransferaseR022510.0002
TALDO12.2.1.2formaldehyde transketolaseR085750.0015
PYCR11.5.1.2proline oxidaseR012485.00E-05
MTHFD21.5.1.15methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NAD+)R012185.00E-05
DHCR71.3.1.217-dehydrocholesterol reductaseR014560.0012
SCD1.14.19.1stearoyl-CoA 9-desaturaseR022225.00E-05
LPO1.11.1.7peroxidaseR033445.00E-05
PGD1.1.1.44phosphogluconate dehydrogenaseR035320.0022
DCXR1.1.1.10L-xylulose reductaseR019040.00155
Table 6. General properties of the constructed sub-network.
Table 6. General properties of the constructed sub-network.
ParametersValues
Number of nodes832
Number of edges1021
Network density0.003
Network heterogeneity0.733
Number of self-loops0
Network diameter28
Network centralisation0.15
Average path length6.913
Table 7. First 15 hub metabolites of the acidosis metabolic network.
Table 7. First 15 hub metabolites of the acidosis metabolic network.
MetabolitesNeutral FormulaKeggIDPubChemIDCompartment
Stearoyl-CoAC39H70N7O17P3SC004123702Endoplasmic Reticulum
Ferrocytochrome b5C36H61O11C009964242Membrane
glutathioneC10H17N3O6SC000513353Cytoplasm
2-oxoglutarateC5H6O5C000263328Mitochondrion
protein-L-arginineC7H13N5O2R2C00613 3887Nucleus
electron-transferring flavoproteinC27H30N9O15P2C042536918Mitochondrion
ubiquinoneC19H26O4C003995280346Mitochondrion
S-adenosyl-L-methionineC15H22N6O5SC0001934755Cytoplasm
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteineC14H20N6O5SC00021439155Nucleus
Acetyl-CoAC23H38N7O17P3SC000243326Cytoplasm
L-tryptophanC11H12N2O2C000783378Cytoplasm
L-arginineC7H13N5O2R2C00613 3887Mitochondrion
L-serineC3H7NO3C000653365Cytoplasm
L-LactateC3H6O3C00186 3486Cytoplasm
XanthineC10H13N4O9PC00655 73323Nucleus
Table 8. Most of the pathways enriched by up-regulated and down-regulated enzymes.
Table 8. Most of the pathways enriched by up-regulated and down-regulated enzymes.
Significant
Up-expression enzymes
Fatty acid metabolismButyrate metabolism (ec00650)
Arachidonic acid metabolism (ec00590)
Linoleic acid metabolism (ec00591)
Fatty acid degradation (ec00071)
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis (ec00770)
Biosynthesis of amino acidsValine, leucine and isoleucine metabolism (ec00280)
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism (ec00260)
Pyruvate and carbon metabolismGlycolysis/Gluconeogenesis (ec00010)
Pentose phosphate (ec00030)
Pyruvate metabolism (ec00620)
Glutathione metabolism (ec00480)
Fructose and mannose metabolism (ec00051)
Galactose metabolism (ec00052)
Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies (ec00072)
Pentose and glucuronate interconversions (ec00040)
Significant
Down-expression enzymes
Nucleotide metabolismPurine metabolism (ec00230)
Pyrimidine metabolism (ec00240)
Other metabolismsVitamin B6 metabolism (ec00750)
Biosynthesis of antibiotics (ec01130)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gholizadeh, M.; Fayazi, J.; Asgari, Y.; Zali, H.; Kaderali, L. Reconstruction and Analysis of Cattle Metabolic Networks in Normal and Acidosis Rumen Tissue. Animals 2020, 10, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030469

AMA Style

Gholizadeh M, Fayazi J, Asgari Y, Zali H, Kaderali L. Reconstruction and Analysis of Cattle Metabolic Networks in Normal and Acidosis Rumen Tissue. Animals. 2020; 10(3):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gholizadeh, Maryam, Jamal Fayazi, Yazdan Asgari, Hakimeh Zali, and Lars Kaderali. 2020. "Reconstruction and Analysis of Cattle Metabolic Networks in Normal and Acidosis Rumen Tissue" Animals 10, no. 3: 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop