Next Article in Journal
Updated Taxonomy of Pectobacterium Genus in the CIRM-CFBP Bacterial Collection: When Newly Described Species Reveal “Old” Endemic Population
Next Article in Special Issue
Urine-Based Antigen (Protein) Detection Test for the Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli and Sequence Type 131 in Fecal Colonization in Dogs in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Absence of C-5 DNA Methylation in Leishmania donovani Allows DNA Enrichment from Complex Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Central Asian Rodents as Model Animals for Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani Research

1
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12844 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12844 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(9), 1440; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091440
Submission received: 24 August 2020 / Revised: 15 September 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 / Published: 20 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leishmania and Leishmaniasis)

Abstract

:
The clinical manifestation of leishmaniases depends on parasite species, host genetic background, and immune response. Manifestations of human leishmaniases are highly variable, ranging from self-healing skin lesions to fatal visceral disease. The scope of standard model hosts is insufficient to mimic well the wide disease spectrum, which compels the introduction of new model animals for leishmaniasis research. In this article, we study the susceptibility of three Asian rodent species (Cricetulus griseus, Lagurus lagurus, and Phodopus sungorus) to Leishmania major and L. donovani. The external manifestation of the disease, distribution, as well as load of parasites and infectiousness to natural sand fly vectors, were compared with standard models, BALB/c mice and Mesocricetus auratus. No significant differences were found in disease outcomes in animals inoculated with sand fly- or culture-derived parasites. All Asian rodent species were highly susceptible to L. major. Phodopus sungorus showed the non-healing phenotype with the progressive growth of ulcerative lesions and massive parasite loads. Lagurus lagurus and C. griseus represented the healing phenotype, the latter with high infectiousness to vectors, mimicking best the character of natural reservoir hosts. Both, L. lagurus and C. griseus were also highly susceptible to L. donovani, having wider parasite distribution and higher parasite loads and infectiousness than standard model animals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Leishmania parasites (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) are causative agents of leishmaniases, a group of diseases prevalent worldwide in 98 countries with more than 350 million people considered at risk, more than 1 million new cases occurring every year, and more than 50 thousand deaths annually, due to the visceral form [1,2]. The epidemiology and ecology of leishmaniases are exceptionally complex—at least 20 Leishmania species are pathogenic to humans, each of them possessing different mammalian reservoir hosts, as well as insect vectors [3].
This species diversity is reflected in the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of human leishmaniases, which results from interactions between the parasite species and the host immune responses. Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), transmitted by diverse sand fly vector species, is caused principally by L. major, L. tropica, and L. aethiopica in the Old World and L. mexicana, L. venezuelensis, L. amazonensis, L. braziliensis, L. panamensis, L. guyanensis, and L. peruviana in the New World. Infection with CL may be characterized by localized, diffuse, or disseminated skin lesions [4]. Metastatic mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), confined to the New World, is due to Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis or, less frequently, L. (V.) panamensis and L. (V.) guyanensis. Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by L. donovani and L. infantum, is the most severe form, often fatal if left untreated, characterized by fever, loss of weight, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly and/or lymphadenopathy, and anemia [5].
Experimental animal models are expected to mimic the specific features of the variety of human leishmaniases. Many immunological aspects of the disease have been studied using standard laboratory models, such as mice, hamsters, domestic dogs, and non-human primates. However, none of them accurately reproduces the outcome of human Leishmania infection [6]. The major advantage of inbred mouse models is their controlled genetic background and well-defined immune response. On the other hand, replication and spread of the pathogen in mice are far from the natural pattern. The relative lack of genetic polymorphism in laboratory mice has been specifically overcome by using stocks derived from recently trapped wild progenitors belonging to different taxa of the genus Mus [7]. An alternative approach is the use of genetically polymorphic wild rodents as experimental animal models for host-parasite relationships studies. These models allow a better understanding of the dynamics and range of infection, including mechanisms of parasite amplification, their availability for transmission, and the natural regulation of the immune response [6].
More than 20 rodent species have been used for experimental infections with Leishmania parasites. The extensive research in this field was mainly done during the first half of the last century. However, many of the tested species are protected or difficult to breed in the laboratory, and many of them have been shown to be resistant to infection (reviewed in [8]). More recently, two New World wild rodent species Thrichomys laurentius and Peromyscus yucatanicus have been used for the study of L. infantum, L. braziliensis, and L. mexicana infections, respectively [9,10].
Our study was aimed at evaluation of susceptibility of three Central Asian rodent species, Cricetulus griseus, Phodopus sungorus, and Lagurus lagurus to two human pathogenic Leishmania species. The three rodent species were chosen as they are commercially available and relatively easy to breed. Moreover, several publications from the beginning of the last century showed the susceptibility of C. griseus to Leishmania donovani [11,12,13,14], while L. lagurus was used for testing of VL in China (reviewed in [15]). Here, rodents were infected with L. major and L. donovani, using different inoculum types (sand fly vs. culture-derived parasites). Fluorescence detection and quantitative PCR were applied to evaluate the load of parasites and their anatomical distribution in the rodent.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sand Flies, Parasites, and Rodents

The sand fly colonies of Phlebotomus duboscqi (originating from Senegal) and Phlebotomus orientalis (originating from Ethiopia) were maintained in the insectary of the Department of Parasitology, Charles University in Prague, under standardized conditions (26 °C, fed on 50% sucrose, and with 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod) as previously described [16].
Two Leishmania strains were used for infection of sand flies and rodents: L. major (MHOM/IR/-/173) and L. donovani (MHOM/ET/2009/AM459) with DsRed and RFP red fluorescent markers, respectively, prepared according to the methodology described by Sadlova et al. [17]. Promastigotes were cultured in M199 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FBS Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2% sterile human urine, supplemented with 1% BME vitamins (Basal Medium Eagle, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 250 µL/mL amikacin (Medopharm, Prague, Czech Republic).
Five rodent species were used: Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamsters), Lagurus lagurus (Steppe lemmings), Phodopus sungorus (Djungarian hamsters), Mesocricetus auratus (Golden hamsters), and Mus musculus (BALB/c mice), all originating from commercial sources. BALB/c mice and M. auratus originated from AnLab s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic), C. griseus, Phodopus sungorus, and L. lagurus from Karel Kapral s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic). Breeding containers T2 and T3 (Velaz s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic) were used for maintaining BALB/c mice; the remaining species were maintained in breeding containers 3/H3 and T4 (Velaz s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). Containers were equipped with German Horse Span bedding (Pferde a.s., Prague, Czech Republic), breeding material (Woodwool, Miloslav Vlk s.r.o., Ratibor, Czech Republic), hay (Krmne smesi Kvidera s.r.o, Nezvestice, Czech Republic), and the standard feed mixture ST-1 (Velaz s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). The feed mixture MOK (Biopharm s.r.o., Kraluv Dvur, Czech Republic) without animal protein content was used for L. lagurus. Food and water were provided ad libitum, and the animals were maintained in standard conditions (12 h dark/12 h light photoperiod, at a temperature of 22–25 °C and humidity of 40–60%).

2.2. Experimental Infections of Sand Flies

Promastigotes from log-phase cultures were resuspended in heat-inactivated defibrinated rabbit blood at a concentration of 1 × 106 promastigotes/mL. Sand fly females were infected by feeding through a chick-skin membrane, and engorged specimens were maintained in the same conditions as the colony.

2.3. Infections of Rodents

Two methods for infection of rodents were used: Infections initiated with sand fly-derived promastigotes (SDP) according to Sadlova et al. [18] and infection initiated with stationary phase culture-derived promastigotes (CDP), to include infective metacyclic forms. For the first method, sand fly females experimentally infected with Leishmania parasites were dissected on day 8 post bloodmeal, when mature infections and accumulation of metacyclic forms had developed in the thoracic midguts (TMG). Pools of 80 freshly dissected TMG with a good density of parasites were homogenized in 40 µL of sterile saline. For the inoculation of rodents with CDP, stationary-phase culture was washed twice in saline. For the selection of L. major metacyclic forms, 50 µL/mL of peanut agglutinin lectin (PNA) was added, which agglutinated the procyclic forms with galactosyl side-chains of LPG. The non-agglutinated metacyclic forms were then separated using centrifugation (200 G/5 min, 4 °C) [19]. Parasites were counted using a Bürker chamber, and pools of 106 or 108 promastigotes (L. donovani), or 106 metacyclic forms (L. major) were resuspended in 50 µL of saline. Dissected salivary glands of P. duboscqi and P. orientalis females (SG) were pooled (10 glands per 10 µL of saline) and stored at −20 °C. Prior to the inoculation of mice, SG were frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed three times, and the resulting lysate was added to the inoculum.
Rodents were anesthetized with a mixture of 66 mg/kg ketamine and 26 mg/kg xylazine. Then, 5.5 µL of inoculum (mixed parasites with SG suspension) were injected intradermally into the ear pinnae. Therefore, the inoculum dose per animal with CDP comprised of 105 or 107 promastigotes (L. donovani) or 105 selected metacyclic forms (L. major). Numbers of SDP were calculated using a Bürker chamber, and the proportion of metacyclic forms was identified on Giemsa stained smears based on morphological criteria described previously [20]. Leishmania major numbers ranged from 5.6 × 104 to 7.6 × 104 per animal with metacyclics comprising 69–73% of all forms, L. donovani numbers ranged from 5.0 × 104 to 6.39 × 105 per animal with 29–46% of metacyclic forms. Post inoculation (p.i.), rodents were checked weekly for external signs of the disease and killed at week 9–15 p.i. or 30 p.i. for groups infected with L. major and L. donovani, respectively. The experiments were performed in two runs in all rodent species.

2.4. Xenodiagnosis

Five to seven-day-old sand fly females were used for xenodiagnosis experiments. Phlebotomus duboscqi females (natural vectors of L. major [21]) were allowed to feed on the site of inoculation of L. major (ear pinnae) of anesthetized rodents; the rodent bodies were covered with a cotton bag, so that only the left ear pinnae were accessible to sand flies. Phlebotomus orientalis females (natural vectors of L. donovani [22]) were allowed to feed on the whole body of the anesthetized rodents infected with L. donovani (the smaller ear pinnae of L. lagurus did not produce sufficient access to initiate the feeding behavior of P. orientalis females). The rodents were placed into a small cage (20 × 20 × 20 cm) and 30–40 sand fly females were allowed to feed for one hour. The fed sand fly females were separated and maintained at 26 °C on 50% sucrose. On day 7–10 PBM, the females were dissected, and their guts were examined under a light microscope. The intensities and locations of infections were evaluated, as described previously [19].

2.5. Tissue Sampling and Fluorescence Detection of Leishmania Post-Mortem

Rodents were killed by cervical dislocation under anaesthesia. Both ears (inoculated and contralateral), both ear-draining lymph nodes, spleen, liver, paws, and tail, were removed and placed on Petri dishes. Fluorescence detection of Leishmania was done immediately post killing using the In Vivo Xtreme optical display (Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) at the Center of Advanced Imaging Methods at the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 570 nm and 700 nm. Leishmania positivity was evaluated as the color difference against the negative controls, i.e., organs and tissues of uninfected animals. After that, half of all the left and right ears were used for parasite detection by flow cytometry. The second half of each ear and other organs were stored at −20 °C for quantitative PCR (q PCR).

2.6. Flow Cytometry and qPCR

The preparation procedure was identical for all rodent groups. Half of the ear was homogenized into small pieces in the 1 mL well on the plate. Then 500 µL saline, 42 µL liberase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 2 µL DNAse (Top-bio s.r.o., Vestec, Czech Republic) were added. The plate with the samples was incubated for 50 min (37 °C, 5% CO2). After stopping tissue digestion with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FBS Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), the samples were filtered through fine gauze into a cold tube and centrifuged (8 min/175 G, 8 °C). The pellet was resuspended in 800 µL saline. 200 µL of the suspension from each sample was used for parasite detection by flow cytometry using the cytometer LRS II (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and the software Flowlogic 7.3. Before measurement, Hoechst dye 33258 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to each sample to identify dead cells. Before tissue analysis, the sensitivity of flow cytometry was tested and scaled with culture-derived Leishmania samples (with a range of 101–108 cells). The final results are expressed per the whole volume of the suspension and corresponding to half of the ear pinna.
For q PCR, extraction of total DNA from rodent tissues and sand flies was performed using a DNA tissue isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Q PCR for detection and quantification of Leishmania parasites was performed in a Bio-Rad iCycler and iQ Real-Time PCR Systems using the SYBR Green detection method (iQ SYBR Green Supermix, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) as described [20].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using the R software (http://cran.r-project.org/), and the results were graphically visualized using the “ggplot2” package in the same software. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The relationship between response variables (weight, lesion size, number of parasites, percentage of infected organs, and infectivity to sand flies) and explanatory variable (infection with CDP or SDP) were tested for each rodent species separately. In the case of nonsignificant differences between the infection methods, the data were summarized for the subsequent analysis. The between-species differences were tested with the BALB/c set as the reference level for the variable rodent species. The continuous response variable (weight, lesion size) and their relationship with categorical (infection method, rodent species) and continuous (week p.i.) explanatory variables were examined fitting multilevel linear regression models (package “nlme”), taking into account the correlation between repeated measures of the same animal over time. The model used included the interaction term between categorical and continuous explanatory variables. The association between numbers of parasites in inoculated ear and infection method and between numbers of parasites in inoculated ear and rodent species (between-species differences) were analyzed with GLM with a negative binomial distribution. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the numbers of parasites in inoculated ear measured by two methods, qPCR and flow cytometry. The test was run for each rodent species separately. The influence of the infection method (SDP, CDP- infection dose 105 and 107) on the percentage of L. donovani infected organs in rodent bodies was measured by 2- and 3-sample test for equality of proportions. The relationship between the percentage of sand flies infected by feeding on rodent host (infectiousness) and between percentages of sand flies infected by feeding on rodent host and rodent species (between-species differences) were tested with GLM with a quasi-binomial distribution.

2.8. Animal Experimentation Guidelines

Animals were maintained and handled in the animal facility of Charles University in Prague following institutional guidelines and Czech legislation (Act No. 246/1992 and 359/2012 coll. on Protection of Animals against Cruelty in present statutes at large), which complies with all relevant European Union and international guidelines for experimental animals. All the experiments were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Laboratory Experiments of the Charles University in Prague and were performed under permission no. MSMT-38031/2016-2 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. Investigators are certified for experimentation with animals by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.

3. Results

3.1. Development of L. major in Four Rodent Species

In total, 12 BALB/c mice, 12 P. sungorus, 16 C. griseus, and 16 L. lagurus were infected; half of them with 1 × 105 culture-derived parasites (CDP) selected with PNA for high representation of metacyclic forms and the second half with 6–7 × 104 sand fly-derived parasites (SDP), where metacyclics comprised 69–73% of all morphological forms. The numbers of SDP were derived from 10 dissected sand fly females, without any adjustments, to keep the character of the inoculum as natural as possible.
All four rodent species showed stable growth of the body weight during the experiments, and no significant differences in weight gains were found between the groups infected with CDP and SDP (Table S1). In addition, the lesion growth was very similar for the two inoculum types in BALB/c mice, P. sungorus, and L. lagurus. In C. griseus, lesions in the SDP inoculated group developed more slowly, but the difference against the CDP infected group did not reach the statistical significance (Figure 1 and Table S2).
Lesions appeared very early in BALB/c mice (already on week 2 p.i.), one week later in P. sungorus and L. lagurus (in week 3 p.i.), and even later in C. griseus (week 4 p.i.). Compared to susceptible BALB/c mice, the growth of lesions was very similar in P. sungorus (p = 0.08); the lesions have an ulcerative character in both species (Figure 2a,b), and their size increased progressively until the end of the experiment. In some P. sungorus, the skin surrounding ears was also affected by redness and exuviation (Figure 2c). Experiments with BALB/c mice and P. sungorus were, therefore, finished on week 9–11 p.i. to avoid excessive distress to the animals. In L. lagurus, the lesion growth was significantly slower than in BALB/c mice (p < 0.0001), and although the character of lesions was initially also ulcerative (Figure 2d); their size increased only to week 7 p.i. and then began to reduce. These animals were able to resolve lesions by necrosis of affected parts, resulting in a reduction of the size of ear pinnae (Figure 2e). In C. griseus, lesion development was also significantly slower than in BALB/c mice (p = 0.0001); lesions were not ulcerative and were fully healed in some (3 out of 13) animals (Figure 2f, Table S2).
Numbers of parasites in inoculated ears were evaluated from the samples taken post-mortem using two different methods—qPCR and flow cytometry. Similar to the previous analyses, qPCR did not reveal significant differences between animals inoculated with CDP and SDP; therefore, results were summarized for both infection modes. Parasite loads in inoculated ears generally ranged between 102 and 107 parasites with a median of 103–104 in L. lagurus and 105–106 in the remaining three species. Both quantification methods showed similar numbers of parasites in inoculated ears of BALB/c mice and P. sungorus (Table 1 and Figure S1). Based on the data from qPCR, significantly lower parasite loads in comparison with numbers in BALB/c mice were detected in C. griseus (p = 0.03), and the parasite load was lowest in L. lagurus (p = 0.0003). Based on data from flow cytometry, the difference between the four species was insignificant in this respect. The direct comparison of the two quantification methods in individual species revealed no significant differences in BALB/c mice (p = 0.6221), P. sungorus (p = 0.4357), and C. griseus (p = 0.08), while in L. lagurus qPCR gave significantly lower numbers than flow cytometry (p = 0.011).
The distribution of parasites in rodent bodies was evaluated using the PCR and the fluorescence detection with In Vivo Xtreme (Table S3, Figure 3a, and Appendix A). In BALB/c mice, parasites remained restricted to both ears (inoculated and contralateral) and their draining lymph nodes. Only in one animal, the liver was also infected. In all remaining species, Leishmania parasites were detected in all the tested organs and tissues. In P. sungorus, the infection rates in all these tissues were the highest, and these hamsters were also the sole species where blood was also infected. Generally, the PCR was more sensitive than fluorescence detection. For example, numbers of parasites detected in contralateral ears by qPCR reached up to 86 thousand, 56 thousand, 31 thousand, and 15 thousand in BALB/c mice, P. sungorus, C. griseus, and L. lagurus, respectively, but the ears did not produce higher fluorescence signal than negative controls. In addition, the fluorescence detection was not applicable to densely haired paws of P. sungorus and L. lagurus, where even the control animals produced too strong a fluorescence signal (Appendix A). On the other hand, this method gave a good spatial picture of the parasite distribution. In ear pinnae, the fluorescence signal mostly corresponded to areas affected by skin lesions (Figure 3b). In the liver, the signal came either from the single site (typically in BALB/c mice or L. lagurus), or there were several smaller fluorescence centers dispersed over the whole organ (apparent in P. sungorus infected with CDP, Appendix A).
Infectiousness of animals, tested by xenodiagnosis experiments with P. duboscqi females, was, again, very similar in the groups infected with CDP and SDP (Table 2). Infectiousness corresponded very well to parasite loads in inoculated ears: The values in P. sungorus and C. griseus (29% and 11% of sand flies infected, respectively) did not differ significantly from infectiousness of BALB/c mice (14% of sand flies infected, p = 0.19 and p = 0. 54, respectively), while L. lagurus infected significantly fewer sand fly females than BALB/c mice (8% of sand flies infected, p = 0.006).

3.2. Development of L. donovani in Four Rodent Species

In total, 14 C. griseus, 12 BALB/c mice, 12 L. lagurus, and 12 M. auratus were infected with L. donovani; 3 L. lagurus and 3 M. auratus with 105 CDP, three individuals of each species with 107 CDP, and 32 animals with 5–63.9 × 104 SDP, where metacyclics comprised 29–46% of all morphological forms.
All the rodent species showed stable weight gain during the experiment, and the weight did not differ between the CDP and SDP groups (Table S4). None of the inoculated animals developed lesions or other external signs of the disease throughout the entire experiment. Nevertheless, qPCR performed at the end of the experiment (on week 30 p.i.) revealed the presence of L. donovani DNA in various tissues and organs of infected rodents (Table S5). The size of the inoculum (105 vs. 107 parasites) considerably influenced the outcome of the infection. In both species inoculated with 105 CDP (M. auratus and L. lagurus), only one of 3 individuals became infected, dissemination through the body was limited, and only low parasite loads (<103) were found in tissues of these animals (Figure 4a). Higher infection rates and parasite loads were detected in animals infected with 107 CDP and SDP, and no significant differences were found between these two groups (Table S5). Therefore, the data from 107 CDP and SDP inoculated animals were combined for further analyses.
In M. auratus, 7/9 animals infected with 107 CDP and SDP maintained the parasite till the end of the experiment. However, Leishmania parasites were present in low numbers (<103 per sample) and remained restricted to inoculated ears or, in one specimen, draining lymph nodes of the inoculated ear (Figure 4a). In BALB/c mice, 8/12 individuals showed infection and the parasite visceralized into various tissues and organs except for the tail and blood, but again, the parasite numbers did not exceed 103. In C. griseus, Leishmania were detected in 12/14 animals and spread to all the tested tissues and organs except for the tail and blood. Contrary to M. auratus and BALB/c mice, parasite loads per sample were often higher than 103 or 104. All L. lagurus inoculated with 107 CDP and SDP were Leishmania-positive, parasites were detected in all the tested tissues except blood, and high parasite loads (>104) prevailed. Infected spleens showed distinct enlargement (Figure 4a,b).
Infectiousness to sand flies was tested from weeks 15 to 30 p.i. Phlebotomus orientalis females were allowed to feed on the whole body of anesthetized animals (Table 3). All the 514 and 207 P. orientalis females fed on BALB/c mice and M. auratus, respectively, were negative. On the contrary, for C. griseus, sand fly females became infected at week 25, and the infectiousness persisted until the end of the experiment in both 107 CDP and SDP groups. In total, 144 P. orientalis females were used for xenodiagnosis with L. lagurus. In this case, considerable differences appeared between the three groups. Specimens inoculated with 105 CDP were not infectious to the vector during the whole experiment, while in both remaining groups, sand flies became infected 25 weeks p.i. (25% of sand flies infected) and the infectiousness was still high (18.5%) or even increased (57.1%) 30 weeks p.i. in animals inoculated with SDP and 107 CDP, respectively.

4. Discussion

Experimental infections of C. griseus, L. lagurus, and P. sungorus were performed to establish new laboratory models for studying leishmaniasis. Three Asian rodent species were compared here with the most widely used laboratory animals in leishmaniasis research—BALB/c mice and golden hamsters. All the tested Asian rodent species were highly susceptible to both Leishmania species, but showed different disease phenotypes. All Asian species showed high susceptibility to L. major, surpassing BALB/c mice with the wider anatomical distribution of the parasites and offering the model of both the healing phenotype (L. lagurus and C. griseus) and the non-healing phenotype (P. sungorus). Lagurus lagurus also exhibited excellent susceptibility to L. donovani, presenting giant parasite loads in all the tested tissues and organs.
Chinese hamsters, C. griseus, were already introduced to the study of leishmaniasis in 1924 by Smyly and Young [11]. All ten animals in their experiments were successfully infected with intraperitoneal inoculation of large amounts of liver and splenic emulsion from kala-azar patients. This study was continued, and in 1926, the authors described a high rate of C. griseus infections (129 from 182 animals), and although hepatosplenomegaly was developed, the animals remained in good condition up to a year [12]. Hindle and Patton showed, in the same year, that C. griseus were also susceptible to intraperitoneal inoculation of promastigote forms, while intradermal and subcutaneous inoculation of amastigotes or promastigotes were not successful [13]. In our experiments, initiated with intradermal inoculation of promastigotes, C. griseus was confirmed as highly susceptibility to L. donovani—86% of animals were successfully infected. Although no external signs of the disease were apparent, parasites disseminated to almost all tested organs and tissues with the highest presence in inoculated ears (79% of animals) and spleen (71% of animals). Infectiousness to sand flies was confirmed from week 25 p.i. In addition, C. griseus were also susceptible to L. major. The parasites persisted in inoculated ears in 88% of animals, disseminated to all tested skin samples (contralateral ears, paws, tail), and to a lesser extent, also reached visceral organs (13% and 31% of liver and spleen samples, respectively). The ear skin lesions were not ulcerative, well-tolerated, or even healed, and animals were highly infectious to sand flies, of the tested species most accurately mimicking the features of the natural host of L. major. In natural reservoirs, visceralisation of L. major was observed repeatedly—bone marrow, lymph node and spleen of Psammomys obesus and spleen and liver of C. gundi caught in Tunisia were identified as positive by ITS1-PCR [23,24] and spleen and liver of gerbils and Rattus rattus were shown to be PCR- positive in southern Iran [25,26].
Similar to C. griseus, L. lagurus also tended to heal skin lesions caused by L. major. Parasites were detected in 94% of inoculated ears and 44% of forepaws and were also present in other skin samples (contralateral ears, hindpaws, tail), but only exceptionally visceralized. Concerning VL, these rodents have been used as animal models in few studies performed in the 1990s in China (reviewed in [15]). Our results proved higher susceptibility of L. lagurus to L. donovani compared to both golden hamsters and BALB/c mice. High loads of parasites were detected in both external and visceral tissues and organs, and the infectiousness to sand flies was the highest among the tested species. Except for splenomegaly, the animals did not show signs of suffering, which favors L. lagurus as the optimal model for progressive disseminated visceral leishmaniasis.
Finally, P. sungorus showed exceptional susceptibility to L. major. The growth of skin lesions was progressive, similar to BALB/c mice and the parasite numbers in inoculated ears were also comparably high. Parasites disseminated to all tested tissues and organs, including blood and viscera (71% of spleen samples infected), and of all the tested species, the highest infection rates, and infectiousness to sand flies were observed. Therefore, P. sungorus may serve as a genetically polymorphic animal model for testing drug resistance or vaccine efficacy, an alternative to inbred lines of susceptible mice.
The three Asian rodent species share distribution with human pathogenic L. donovani, L. infantum, and L. major, but reports of their involvement in the life cycle of the parasites are lacking. To our best knowledge, the only indirect indication is that the related species Cricetulus migratorius was reported to be infected with L. donovani species complex in Iran [27,28]. In nature, the three rodent species included in this study prefer arid habitats like steppes, steppe forests, and semi-deserts. Lagurus lagurus are widely distributed from Ukraine to north-west China, C. griseus range from Kazakhstan and west Siberia to Mongolia, north-east China, and the Korean peninsula, and P. sungorus are restricted to Kazakhstan and south of west and central Siberia [29]. In theory, all species fulfill the criteria postulated by Ashford (1996) [30] for the reservoir host—in their habitats, they are abundant, forming a large proportion of the mammalian biomass during population outbreaks, and are sufficiently long-lived to allow Leishmania surviving through the non-transmission season. As shown in this laboratory study, their response to infection also meets Ashford’s criteria—a large proportion of individuals are infected; they remain infected for a long time without the acute disease, and the parasites are in the skin accessible to feeding sand fly vectors.
The development of Leishmania infection in the host body is a complex process that depends on many factors, the most important being the Leishmania species and virulence of the parasite strain on one side and secondly on the genetic background and the immune response of the mammalian host. In addition, the clinical manifestation of the disease is influenced substantially by the experimental design, especially the infection dose, type of inoculum (procyclic/metacyclic promastigotes or amastigotes), and inoculation route [8,31,32,33]. In the mouse model, it has been shown that the delivery of the parasites by sand flies makes a substantial contribution to Leishmania infection in comparison with syringe inoculation [34]. The significant influence of the inoculation route on disease outcome was also observed in the hamster model: Disease progressions were slower, when L. braziliensis, L. mexicana, L. donovani or L. infantum infections were initiated by a sand fly bite or intradermal inoculation. Infections initiated with intracardiac or subcutaneous inoculation showed unnatural rapid visceralisation without the formation of skin lesions [33,35,36].
Initiation of infection with sand fly bite comprises several factors exacerbating the disease progression, specifically, sand fly saliva components (reviewed in [37]), parasite-derived exosomes [38], and promastigote secretory gel [34]. However, using this natural infection route, the inoculum dose cannot be controlled—the numbers of parasites transmitted by sand fly bite differ in several orders of magnitude between individual females [39,40,41]. Therefore, we used natural parasite forms derived from thoracic midguts of experimentally infected sand flies with late-stage infection (SDP), which were homogenized, counted, and inoculated by syringe. The inoculum size of SDP (5–8 × 104) in L. major did not exceed the upper numbers delivered to host tissues by P. duboscqi bite (1 × 105) [39], and the percentage of metacyclic forms (69–73%) corresponded to the average percentage of metacyclic forms in thoracic midguts of P. duboscqi [42]. In L. donovani, the infectious dose of SDP was slightly higher (5 × 104–6.4 × 105), but in this case, a lower percentage of metacyclic forms was present in the inoculum (29–46%). The disease progression in animals inoculated with SDP was compared with animals infected with promastigotes from stationary-phase cultures (CDP). Homogenates of sand fly salivary glands were co-inoculated with both inoculum types to enhance the development of infection [43], and the intradermal route of infection was used to ensure parasite exposure to the local immune response in the skin [44]. No significant differences in lesion growth, infectiousness to sand flies, and parasite loads were found between animals infected with SDP or CDP in any rodent, and Leishmania species. These results suggest that culture-derived parasites with sufficient representation of metacyclic forms co-inoculated with sand fly saliva intradermally can adequately simulate the natural features of the disease.
On the other hand, the progression of L. donovani infections in M. auratus and L. lagurus was significantly affected by the infectious dose—lower infection rates, dissemination, and parasite loads were detected in rodents infected with 105 L. donovani CDP compared to animals infected with 107 L. donovani CDP and SDP. This is in accordance with previous studies with various Leishmania species using the mouse model [34,39,45,46].
Distributions and numbers of parasites in rodent bodies were evaluated from samples taken post-mortem using three different methods—quantitative PCR, flow cytometry, and the fluorescence detection with In Vivo Extreme. For this purpose, L. major and L. donovani parasites were marked with DsRed and RFP, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is being increasingly used for leishmaniasis diagnosis, characterization, and identification of Leishmania species, due to the high sensitivity for the detection and identification of Leishmania species (reviewed in [47]). Quantitative PCR is a commonly used method for determining the quantity of Leishmania DNA in various tissues of laboratory animals experimentally infected with Leishmania parasites, asymptomatic humans from endemic areas, and also for testing putative reservoir hosts [18,48,49,50]. Flow cytometry-based on the use of fluorescent probes is a relatively quick and cheap method that has been introduced to detect various protozoan parasites in the host cells [51,52,53,54]. When combined with the vital DNA Hoechst dye [55], this method is effective for visualizing both the living and dead populations of Leishmania parasites in the sample. In our study, both quantification methods were very specific and showed similar numbers of parasites in all rodent species, with the exception of L. lagurus. However, in this species, the preparation of samples for quantitative analyses was more difficult because of the much-reduced size of ear pinnae at the end of the experiment, which might influence the analyses.
In addition to PCR, the parasite distributions in rodent bodies were visualized by fluorescence detection with In Vivo Xtreme. In vivo imaging is a novel non-invasive procedure, which can be used for analyzing and monitoring small animal models of leishmaniasis [56,57]. If parasites were engineered to express luciferase, their numbers and distribution in individual animals could be imaged multiple times during longitudinal studies [56]. In this study, Leishmania parasites were marked with the red fluorescence protein suitable for flow cytometry, but the fluorescence signal with In Vivo Xtreme was not sensitive enough to detect parasites without killing of animals. Therefore, the analysis was performed post-mortem. While qPCR revealed parasite loads in infected organs, the fluorescence method provided valuable information about the Leishmania spatial distribution within these organs. Surprisingly, between-species differences were observed in this respect. In the liver, fluorescence signal came from the single spot in BALB/c mice and L. lagurus, while there were several smaller amastigote centers dispersed over the whole organs in P. sungorus. However, lower parasite loads were not detectable, and this method was not applicable to densely haired paws of P. sungorus and L. lagurus, due to high autofluorescence of the background.
Laboratory-bred golden hamsters are highly susceptible to visceral leishmaniasis [33,58]. They often exhibit severe clinical signs and symptoms during visceral infection (hypergammaglobulinemia, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia, cachexia) that is initiated by the intracardiac or the intraperitoneal route (reviewed in [59]). In this study, L. donovani infections were initiated intradermally, and parasites remained restricted to inoculated ears, in low loads. Mild disease outcome and a delay in disease progression in hamsters after intradermal inoculation of both L. donovani and L. infantum has been repeatedly described [60,61]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that the immune response to sand fly salivary protein protects hamsters against the fatal outcome of VL [62]. This study showed that, contrary to golden hamsters, the L. lagurus model enables the study of disseminated VL initiated via a natural intradermal route. Such a model is, therefore, closer to the active human disease and should be favored for drug and vaccine testing.
Inbred BALB/c mice are highly susceptible to L. major showing a non-healing phenotype associated with polarization to a Th2 response, which is not effective against intracellular parasites (reviewed in [63]). On the other hand, BALB/c mice are able to control L. donovani and L. braziliensis infection [64,65,66]. In this study, the tissue specificity was different for the two parasite species in BALB/c mice. Leishmania major amastigotes remained localized in inoculated ears and draining lymph nodes, without visceralisation. Mice infected with L. donovani showed spleen and liver infections in 58% and 33% of mice by week 30 p.i., respectively. This corresponds to general observation of murine visceral leishmaniasis with both L. donovani and L. infantum—the liver serves as the site for initial parasite expansion with fast parasite resolution, while in the spleen, visceralising Leishmania can persist for the life of the animal (reviewed in [31,59,67]). Although inbred mouse models have been invaluable for research on the principles of the mammalian immune response, wild rodents provide a more natural model of parasite-host interactions as, like humans, they are genetically polymorphic [6]. A larger spectrum of model species, covering the whole picture of human leishmaniasis, is also a prerequisite to facilitate vaccine development [68]. In this respect, L. lagurus and C. griseus may be used in research on the healing CL phenotype, while P. sungorus provides the non-healing CL phenotype. All three species showed higher dissemination of L. major in the tissues and organs than BALB/c mice.
This study provides experimental infections of three Asian rodent species to enrich the animal model spectrum available to both CL and VL research. Cricetulus griseus, P. sungorus, and L. lagurus, although all are susceptible to both L. major and L. donovani, differ in the infection outcomes, which enable their application to various research objectives. Further studies are necessary to better understand the immunological mechanisms involved in the response of these rodents to Leishmania.

5. Conclusions

1. Infections initiated with intradermal inoculation of 105 culture-derived metacyclic L. major or with 107culture-derived non-selected L. donovani, co-inoculated with 0.5 sand fly SG, were fully comparable in all disease manifestations to infections initiated with sand fly-derived parasites (10 sand fly thoracic midguts and 0.5 sand fly SG per animal).
2. Lagurus lagurus represented the healing phenotype with L. major infections. In addition, this rodent species showed higher susceptibility to L. donovani than golden hamsters and BALB/c mice—parasites were present in high loads in all the tested tissues and organs and the infectiousness to sand flies was the highest among tested species; therefore, these animals may best model disseminated visceral leishmaniasis.
3. Cricetulus griseus tolerated well or even healed L. major lesions, while parasites remained widely distributed through the body, and animals were highly infectious to sand flies, mimicking best the features of the natural host of the parasite. These rodents were also highly susceptible to L. donovani, similarly to L. lagurus.
4. Phodopus sungorus showed high susceptibility to L. major with the non-healing phenotype manifested in the progressive growth of ulcerative lesions and massive parasite loads in inoculated ears. Dissemination of parasites through the body and infectiousness to sand flies was even higher than in immunodeficient BALB/c mice.
5. Both qPCR and flow cytometry are highly sensitive methods for the evaluation of parasite loads in host tissues. Fluorescence detection using In Vivo Xtreme, although less sensitive and not suitable for accurate quantification of parasites, gives valuable spatial data for parasite distribution.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/9/1440/s1, Figure S1: Numbers of L. major parasites in inoculated ears evaluated by qPCR (A) and flow cytometry (B), Table S1: Weight gains in four rodent species inoculated with L. major, Table S2: Lesions diameters (mm) in animals inoculated with L. major, Table S3: Parasite loads and distribution determined by qPCR in animals inoculated with L. major, Table S4: Weight gains in four rodent species inoculated with L. donovani, Table S5: Parasite loads and distribution determined by qPCR in animals inoculated with L. donovani.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S., B.V., M.A.M.; methodology, B.V., J.S.; formal analysis, T.S.; investigation, B.V., J.S., J.V., T.L., I.K., M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, B.V., J.S.; writing—review and editing, P.V., M.A.M., D.S.-M.; supervision, J.S., P.V.; funding acquisition, P.V., J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ERD Funds, project CePaViP (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000759), the Czech Science Foundation (grant number 17-01911S) and Charles University (Research Centre UNCE 204072 and GAUK 688217). DS-M was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, Marie-Sklodowska Curie grant 642609.

Acknowledgments

We thank to Matthew Yeo (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) for fluorescence marking of the parasites; Helena Kulikova, Lenka Krejcirikova and Kristyna Srstkova for the administrative and technical support. We thank also to the Center of Advanced Imaging Methods at the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, for service work with the In Vivo Xtreme optical display.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Tissues of infected rodents photographed with In Vivo Xtreme optical display post-mortem during the first run of the experiments.
Figure A1. Tissues of infected rodents photographed with In Vivo Xtreme optical display post-mortem during the first run of the experiments.
Microorganisms 08 01440 g0a1
Figure A2. Tissues of infected rodents photographed with In Vivo Xtreme optical display post-mortem during the second run of the experiments. Asterisks indicate control animals.
Figure A2. Tissues of infected rodents photographed with In Vivo Xtreme optical display post-mortem during the second run of the experiments. Asterisks indicate control animals.
Microorganisms 08 01440 g0a2

References

  1. Alvar, J.; Vélez, I.D.; Bern, C.; Herrero, M.; Desjeux, P.; Cano, J.; Jannin, J.; den Boer, M. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bern, C.; Maguire, J.H.; Alvar, J. Complexities of assessing the disease burden attributable to leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2008, 2, e313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Akhoundi, M.; Kuhls, K.; Cannet, A.; Votýpka, J.; Marty, P.; Delaunay, P.; Sereno, D. A historical overview of the classification, evolution, and dispersion of Leishmania parasites and sandflies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akilov, O.E.; Khachemoune, A.; Hasan, T. Clinical manifestations and classification of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2007, 46, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Desjeux, P. Leishmaniasis: Public health aspects and control. Clin. Dermatol. 1996, 14, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Loría-Cervera, N.E.; Andrade-Narváez, J.F. Animal models for the study of leishmaniasis immunology. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2014, 56, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guenet, J.-L.; Bonhomme, F. Wild mice: An ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet. 2003, 19, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hommel, M.; Jaffe, C.L.; Travi, B.; Milon, G. Experimental models for leishmaniasis and for testing anti-leishmanial vaccines. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1995, 89, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roque, A.L.R.; Cupolillo, E.; Marchevsky, R.S.; Jansen, A.M. Thrichomys laurentius (Rodentia; Echimyidae) as a putative reservoir of Leishmania infantum and L. braziliensis: Patterns of experimental infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sosa-Bibiano, E.I.; Van Wynsberghe, N.R.; Canto-Lara, S.B.; Andrade-Narvaez, F.J. Preliminary study towards a novel experimental model to study localized cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) mexicana. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2012, 54, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Smyly, H.J.; Young, C.W. The experimental transmission of leishmaniasis to animals. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1924, 21, 354–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Young, C.W.; Smyly, H.J.; Brown, C. Experimental kala azar in a hamster, Cricetulus griseus M.Edw. Am. J. Hyg. 1926, 6, 254–275. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hindle, E.; Patton, W.S. Reports from the Royal Society’s Kala Azar Commission in China. No. 2.—Experiments Bearing on the Susceptibility of the Striped Hamster (Cricetulus griseus) to Leishmania of Chinese Kala Azar. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1926, 374–379. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meleney, H.E. The Histopathology of Kala-Azar in the Hamster, Monkey, and Man. Am. J. Pathol. 1925, 1, 147–174. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lun, Z.R.; Wu, M.-S.; Chen, Y.-F.; Wang, J.-Y.; Zhou, X.-N.; Liao, L.-F.; Chen, J.-P.; Chow, L.M.C.; Chang, K.P. Visceral leishmaniasis in China: An endemic disease under control. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 987–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Volf, P.; Volfova, V. Establishment and maintenance of sand fly colonies. J. Vector Ecol. 2011, 36, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sadlova, J.; Yeo, M.; Seblova, V.; Lewis, M.D.; Mauricio, I.; Volf, P.; Miles, M. Visualisation of Leishmania donovani fluorescent hybrids during early stage development in the sand fly vector. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sadlova, J.; Seblova, V.; Votypka, J.; Warburg, A.; Volf, P. Xenodiagnosis of Leishmania donovani in BALB/c mice using Phlebotomus orientalis: A new laboratory model. Parasite. Vector. 2015, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Alcolea, P.J.; Alonso, A.; Sánchez-Gorostiaga, A.; Moreno-Paz, M.; Gómez, M.; Ramos, I.; Parro, V.; Larraga, V. Genome-wide analysis reveals increased levels of transcripts related with infectivity in peanut lectin non-agglutinated promastigotes of Leishmania infantum. Genomics 2009, 93, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sadlova, J.; Price, H.P.B.; Smith, A.; Votypka, J.; Volf, P.; Smith, D.F. The stage-regulated HASPB and SHERP proteins are essential for differentiation of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major in its sand fly vector, Phlebotomus papatasi. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 1765–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dostálová, A.; Volf, P. Leishmania development in sand flies: Parasite-vector interactions overview. Parasite. Vector. 2012, 5, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Seblova, V.; Volfova, V.; Dvorak, V.; Pruzinova, K.; Votypka, J.; Kassahun, A.; Gebre-Michael, T.; Hailu, A.; Warburg, A.; Volf, P. Phlebotomus orientalis sand flies from two geographically distant Ethiopian localities: Biology, genetic analyses and susceptibility to Leishmania donovani. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Jaouadi, K.; Haouas, N.; Chaara, D.; Gorcii, M.; Chargui, N.; Augot, D.; Pratlong, F.; Dedet, J.-P.; Ettlijani, S.; Mezhoud, H.; et al. First detection of Leishmania killicki (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae) in Ctenodactylus gundi (Rodentia, Ctenodactylidae), a possible reservoir of human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Parasite Vectors 2011, 4, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ghawar, W.; Bettaieba, J.; Salema, S.; Snoussia, M.-A.; Jaouadia, K.; Yazidia, R.; Ben-Salah, A. Natural infection of Ctenodactylus gundi by Leishmania major in Tunisia. Acta Trop. 2018, 177, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Davami, M.H.; Motazedian, M.H.; Kalantari, M.; Asgari, Q.; Mohammadpour, I.; Sotoodeh-Jahromi, A.; Solhjoo, K.; Pourahmad, M. Molecular survey on detection of leishmania infection in rodent reservoirs in Jahrom District, Southern Iran. J. Arthropod. Borne. Dis. 2014, 8, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  26. Parhizkari, M.; Motazedian, M.H.; Asqari, Q.; Mehrabani, D. The PCR-based detection of Leishmania major in Mus musculus and other rodents caught in southern Iran: A guide to sample selection. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2011, 105, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mohebali, M.; Kanari, M.N.; Kanani, A.; Edrissian, H.; Anvari, S.; Nadim, A. Cricetulus migratorius (gray hamster), another possible animal reservoir of Kala-Azar in Meshkin-Shahr, Iran. Iran. J. Public Health 1995, 24, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mohebali, M.; Moradi-Asl, E.; Rassi, Y. Geographic distribution and spatial analysis of Leishmania infantum infection in domestic and wild animal reservoir hosts of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in Iran: A systematic review. J. Vector Borne Dis 2018, 55, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bradley, R.D. Family Cricetidae. In Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Rodents II; Wilson, D.E., Lacher, T.E., Mittermeier, R.A., Eds.; Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain, 2017; Volume 7, pp. 181–313. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ashford, R.W. Leishmaniasis reservoirs and their significance in control. Clin. Dermatol. 1996, 14, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McCall, L.I.; Zhang, W.W.; Matlashewski, G. Determinants for the development of visceral leishmaniasis disease. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Loeuillet, C.; Bañuls, A.; Hide, M. Study of Leishmania pathogenesis in mice: Experimental considerations. Parasit. Vector. 2016, 9, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Aslan, H.; Dey, R.; Meneses, C.; Castrovinci, P.; Bezerra Jeronimo, S.M.; Oliva, G.; Fischer, L.; Duncan, R.C.; Nakhasi, H.L.; Valenzuela, J.G.; et al. A new model of progressive visceral leishmaniasis in hamsters by natural transmission via bites of vector sand flies. JID 2013, 207, 1328–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rogers, M.E.; Ilg, T.; Nikolaev, A.V.; Ferguson, M.A.J.; Bates, P.A. Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG. Nature 2004, 430, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wilson, H.R.; Dieckmann, B.S.; Childs, G.E. Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania mexicana: Experimental cutaneous infections in golden hamsters. Exp. Parasitol. 1979, 47, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martín-Martín, I.; Jiménez, M.; González, E.; Eguiluz, C.; Molina, R. Natural transmission of Leishmania infantum through experimentally infected Phlebotomus perniciosus highlights the virulence of Leishmania parasites circulating in the human visceral leishmaniasis outbreak in Madrid, Spain. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lestinova, T.; Rohousova, I.; Sima, M.; de Oliveira, C.I.; Volf, P. Insights into the sand fly saliva: Blood-feeding and immune interactions between sand flies, hosts, and Leishmania. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Silverman, J.M.; Clos, J.; Horakova, E.; Wang, A.Y.; Wiesgigl, M.; Kelly, I.; Lynn, M.A.; McMaster, W.R.; Foster, L.J.; Levings, M.K.; et al. Leishmania exosomes modulate innate and adaptive immune responses through effects on monocytes and dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 5011–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kimblin, N.; Peters, N.; Debrabant, A.; Secundino, N.; Egen, J.; Lawyer, P.; Fay, M.P.; Kamhawi, S.; Sacks, D. Quantification of the infectious dose of Leishmania major transmitted to the skin by single sand flies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10125–10130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Maia, C.; Seblova, V.; Sadlova, J.; Votypka, J.; Volf, P. Experimental transmission of Leishmania infantum by two major vectors: A comparison between a viscerotropic and a dermotropic strain. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Secundino, N.F.C.; De Freitas, V.C.; Monteiro, C.C.; Pires, A.-C.A.M.; David, B.A.; Pimenta, P.F.P. The transmission of Leishmania infantum chagasi by the bite of the Lutzomyia longipalpis to two different vertebrates. Parasite. Vector. 2012, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Doehl, J.S.P.; Sadlova, J.; Aslan, H.; Pruzinova, K.; Metangmo, S.; Votypka, J.; Kamhawi, S.; Volf, P.; Smith, D.F. Leishmania HASP and SHERP genes are required for in vivo differentiation, parasite transmission and virulence attenuation in the host. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Belkaid, Y.; Kamhawi, S.; Modi, G.; Valenzuela, J.; Noben-Trauth, N.; Rowton, E.; Ribeiro, J.; Sack, D.L. Development of a natural model of cutaneous leishmaniasis: Powerful effects of vector saliva and saliva preexposure on the long-term outcome of Leishmania major infection in the mouse ear dermis. J. Exp.Med. 1998, 188, 1941–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Belkaid, Y.; Mendez, S.; Lira, R.; Kadambi, N.; Milon, G.; Sacks, D. A natural model of Leishmania major infection reveals a prolonged phase of parasite amplification in the skin before the onset of lesion formation and immunity. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ong, H.B.; Clare, S.; Roberts, A.J.; Wilson, M.E.; Wright, G.J. Establishment, optimisation and quantitation of a bioluminescent murine infection model of visceral leishmaniasis for systematic vaccine screening. Sci Rep. 2020, 10, 4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Carrión, J.; Nieto, A.; Iborra, S.; Iniesta, V.; Soto, M.; Folgueira, C.; Abanades, D.R.; Requena, J.M.; Alonso, C. Immunohistological features of visceral leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Parasite Immunol. 2006, 28, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Conter, C.C.; Camila Alves Mota, C.A.; dos Santos, B.A.; de Souza Braga, L.; de Souza Terrona, M.; Navasconia, T.R.; Bekner Silva Fernandes, A.C.; Galhardo Demarchi, I.; Reinhold de Castroa, K.R.; Alessi Aristides, S.M.; et al. Experimental Parasitology PCR primers designed for new world Leishmania: A systematic review. Exp. Parasitol. 2019, 207, 107773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Conter, C.C.; Neitzke-Abreu, H.C.; Bocchi Pedroso, R.; Campana Lonardoni, K.V.; Verzignassi Silveira, T.G.; Alessi Aristides, S.M. Detection of Leishmania (Viannia) DNA in leucocytes from the blood of patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2015, 48, 626–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fagundes, A.; Schubach, A.; de Paula, C.C.; Bogio, A.; de Fátima Antonio, L.; Botelho Schiavoni, P.; de Souza Monteiro, V.; de Fátima Madeira, M.; Pereira Quintella, L.; Valete-Rosalino, C.M.; et al. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction in the routine diagnosis for tegumentary leishmaniasis in a referral centre. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sadlova, J.; Vojtkova, B.; Hrncirova, K.; Lestinova, T.; Spitzova, T.; Becvar, T.; Votypka, J.; Bates, P.; Volf, P. Host competence of African rodents Arvicanthis neumanni, A. niloticus and Mastomys natalensis for Leishmania major. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 8, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Neumann, N.F.; Gyurek, L.L.; Gammie, L.; Finch, G.R.; Belosevic, M. Comparison of animal infectivity and nucleic acid staining for assessment of Cryptosporidium parvum viability in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Staalsoe, T.; Giha, H.A.; Dodoo, D.; Theander, T.G.; Hviid, L. Detection of antibodies to variant antigens on Plasmodium falciparum -infected erythrocytes by flow cytometry. Cytology 1999, 336, 329–336. [Google Scholar]
  53. Di Giorgio, C.D.I.; Ridoux, O.; Delmas, F.; Azas, N.; Gasquet, M.; Diseases, T. Flow cytometric detection of Leishmania parasites in human monocyte-derived macrophages: Application to antileishmanial-drug testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3074–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Barbieri, C.L.; Giorgio, S.; Merjan, A.J.C.; Figueiredo, E.N. Glycosphingolipid antigens of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis amastigotes identified by use of a monoclonal antibody. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 2131–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Schmid, I.; Uittenbogaart, C.; Jamieson, B.D. Live-cell assay for detection of apoptosis by dual-laser flow cytometry using Hoechst 33342 and 7-amino-actinomycin D. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Thalhofer, C.J.; Graff, J.W.; Love-Homan, L.; Hickerson, S.M.; Noah Craft, N.; Beverley, S.M.; Wilson, M.E. In vivo imaging of transgenic Leishmania parasites in a live host. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 41, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  57. Melo, G.D.; Goyard, S.; Lecoeur, H.; Rouault, E.; Pescher, P.; Fiette, L.; Boissonnas, A.; Minoprio, P.; Lang, T. New insights into experimental visceral leishmaniasis: Real-time in vivo imaging of Leishmania donovani virulence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Melby, P.C.; Chandrasekar, B.; Zhao, W.; Coe, J.E. The hamster as a model of human visceral leishmaniasis: Progressive disease and impaired generation of nitric oxide in the face of a prominent Th1-like cytokine response. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 1912–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Nieto, A.; Domínguez-Bernal, G.; Orden, J.A.; La Fuente, R.D.; Madrid-Elena, N.; Carrión, J. Mechanisms of resistance and susceptibility to experimental visceral leishmaniosis: BALB/c mouse versus syrian hamster model. Vet. Res. 2011, 42, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wilson, M.E.; Innes, D.J.; de Sousa, A.; Pearson, R.D. Early histopathology of experimental infection with Leishmania donovani in hamsters. J. Parasitol 1987, 73, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. das Dores Moreira, N.; Vitoriano-Souya, J.; Rooatt, B.M.; de Abreu Vieira, P.M.; Coura-Vital, W.; de Oliveira Cardoso, J.M.; Rezende, M.T.; Ker, H.G.; Giunchetti, R.C.; Carneiro, C.M.; et al. Clinical, hematological and biochemical alterations in hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) experimentally infected with Leishmania infantum through different routes of inoculation. Parasit. Vector. 2016, 9, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gomes, R.; Teixeira, C.; Teixeira, M.J.; Oliveira, F.; Menezes, M.J.; Silva, C.; de Oliveira, C.I.; Miranda, J.C.; Elnaiem, D.E.; Kamhawi, S.; et al. Immunity to a salivary protein of a sand fly vector protects against the fatal outcome of visceral leishmaniasis in a hamster model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 7845–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sacks, D.; Noben-Trauth, N. The immunology of susceptibility and resistance to Leishmania major in mice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Murray, H.W.; Masur, H.; Keithly, J.S. Cell-mediated immune response in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. I. Correlation between resistance to Leishmania donovani and lymphokine-generating capacity. J. Immunol. 1982, 129, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Rocha, F.J.S.; Schleicher, U.; Mattner, J.; Alber, G.; Bogdan, C. Cytokines, signaling pathways, and effector molecules required for the control of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in mice. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3823–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. De Moura, T.R.; Novais, F.O.; Oliveira, F.; Clarencio, J.; Noronha, A.; Barral, A.; Brodskyn, C.; de Oliveira, C.I. Toward a novel experimental model of infection to study american cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 5827–5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wilson, M.E.; Jeronimo, S.M.B.; Pearson, R.D. Immunopathogenesis of infection with the visceralizing Leishmania species. Microb. Pathog. 2005, 38, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. The Working Group on Research Priorities for Development of Leishmaniasis Vaccines; Nery Costa, C.H.; Peters, N.C.; Maruyama, S.R.; de Brito, E.C., Jr.; Santos, I.K. Vaccines for the leishmaniases: Proposal for a research agenda. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Lesion growth in animals inoculated with L. major using the two infection modes. Solid line = infection with culture-derived promastigotes (CDP); dashed line = infection with sand fly-derived promastigotes (SDP). p values indicate the statistical difference between the two infection types. Data are presented as the means ± standard errors of the means; 15% of the variance was explained by individual variability.
Figure 1. Lesion growth in animals inoculated with L. major using the two infection modes. Solid line = infection with culture-derived promastigotes (CDP); dashed line = infection with sand fly-derived promastigotes (SDP). p values indicate the statistical difference between the two infection types. Data are presented as the means ± standard errors of the means; 15% of the variance was explained by individual variability.
Microorganisms 08 01440 g001
Figure 2. Inoculated ears of BALB/c mice (a), P. sungorus (b,c), L. lagurus (d,e), and C. griseus (f) showing external manifestation of L. major infections at the end of experiments.
Figure 2. Inoculated ears of BALB/c mice (a), P. sungorus (b,c), L. lagurus (d,e), and C. griseus (f) showing external manifestation of L. major infections at the end of experiments.
Microorganisms 08 01440 g002
Figure 3. Anatomical distribution of L. major in four rodent species. (a) Results of fluorescence detection (FD, dark blue) and qPCR (light blue) presented in the balloon graph where the size of the balloon corresponds to the infection rate, i.e., the percentage of L. major-infected organs from the total sum of tested organs of the same type. IE = inoculated ears; CE = contralateral ears; LN-IE = draining lymph nodes of the inoculated ears; LN-CE = draining lymph nodes of the contralateral ears; na = not analyzed. (b) Ears of the C. griseus wetted with saline, photographed by the end of the experiment at week 15 p.i. A, B, images from In Vivo Xtreme optical display; C, D, images taken by Canon EOS 60D camera with Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2,8 1–5× Macro objective. A, C—inoculated left ear with ulcerative lesion and 2240 thousand parasites detected by q PCR. B, D—contralateral right ear with no external manifestation of the disease and 16.8 thousand parasites according to qPCR.
Figure 3. Anatomical distribution of L. major in four rodent species. (a) Results of fluorescence detection (FD, dark blue) and qPCR (light blue) presented in the balloon graph where the size of the balloon corresponds to the infection rate, i.e., the percentage of L. major-infected organs from the total sum of tested organs of the same type. IE = inoculated ears; CE = contralateral ears; LN-IE = draining lymph nodes of the inoculated ears; LN-CE = draining lymph nodes of the contralateral ears; na = not analyzed. (b) Ears of the C. griseus wetted with saline, photographed by the end of the experiment at week 15 p.i. A, B, images from In Vivo Xtreme optical display; C, D, images taken by Canon EOS 60D camera with Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2,8 1–5× Macro objective. A, C—inoculated left ear with ulcerative lesion and 2240 thousand parasites detected by q PCR. B, D—contralateral right ear with no external manifestation of the disease and 16.8 thousand parasites according to qPCR.
Microorganisms 08 01440 g003
Figure 4. (a) Anatomical distribution of L. donovani in rodent species determined by qPCR. Results are presented by the balloon graph where the size of the balloon corresponds to the percentage of L. donovani infected organs from the total sum of tested organs of the same type. IE = inoculated ears; CE = contralateral ears; LN-IE = draining lymph nodes of the inoculated ears; LN-CE = draining lymph nodes of the contralateral ears. 105: Animals inoculated with 105 CDP. Animals that are not 105–labeled were inoculated with 107 CDP or SDP (b) Splenomegaly in L. lagurus infected with L. donovani in comparison with uninfected control animal (in the centre).
Figure 4. (a) Anatomical distribution of L. donovani in rodent species determined by qPCR. Results are presented by the balloon graph where the size of the balloon corresponds to the percentage of L. donovani infected organs from the total sum of tested organs of the same type. IE = inoculated ears; CE = contralateral ears; LN-IE = draining lymph nodes of the inoculated ears; LN-CE = draining lymph nodes of the contralateral ears. 105: Animals inoculated with 105 CDP. Animals that are not 105–labeled were inoculated with 107 CDP or SDP (b) Splenomegaly in L. lagurus infected with L. donovani in comparison with uninfected control animal (in the centre).
Microorganisms 08 01440 g004
Table 1. Comparison of L. major numbers detected in inoculated ears by flow cytometry (FC) and qPCR (PCR). The numbers represent parasite loads in half of the ear pinna.
Table 1. Comparison of L. major numbers detected in inoculated ears by flow cytometry (FC) and qPCR (PCR). The numbers represent parasite loads in half of the ear pinna.
Rodent SpeciesNo. of SamplesMedian
(in Thousands)
Minimum
(in Thousands)
Maximum
(in Thousands)
p Values 1
FCPCRFCPCRFCPCRFCPCRFCPCR
BALB/c mice1212430 438 2 0.32756 14,270 --
P. sungorus511732293 28 46 820 2240 0.930.19
C. griseus1316744152 6 01947 2240 0.890.03
L. lagurus16167 30.040.169829740.090.0003
1 significance of the differences against the values in BALB/c mice.
Table 2. Results of xenodiagnosis experiments performed with P. duboscqi and the four rodent species infected with L. major.
Table 2. Results of xenodiagnosis experiments performed with P. duboscqi and the four rodent species infected with L. major.
Rodent SpeciesRodent Numbe 1No. of Sand Fly FemalesNo. and (%) of Positive FemalesRodent SpeciesRodent NumberNo. of Sand Fly FemalesNo. and (%) of Positive Females
BALB/c mice
p = 0.58
C1300P. sungorus
p = 0.80
C1335 (15)
C2327 (21)C2255 (20)
C3243 (12)C3226 (27)
C4304 (13)C42411 (46)
C5298 (27)C5228 (36)
C6305 (17)12635 (28)
17527 (15)S1326 (19)
S1326 (18)S2259 (36)
S2305 (17)S3339 (27)
S3318 (26)S42210 (45)
S4340S5236 (26)
S5395 (13)13540 (30)
S6330Total26175 (29)
19924 (12)L. lagurus
p = 0.36
C140
Total37451 (14)C220
C. griseus
p = 0.84
C1236 (26)C320
C2243 (13)C4202 (10)
C3272 (7)C5250
C4231 (4)C6231 (4)
C5230C7242 (8)
C6245 (21)1005 (5)
C7200S130
16417 (10)S222 (100)
S1280S320
S2155 (33)S4222 (9)
S3260S5181 (6)
S4238 (35)S6133 (23)
S5152 (13)S7263 (12)
S6190S8220
12615 (12)10811 (10)
Total29032 (11)Total20816 (8)
1 CX, rodents inoculated with CDP, SX, rodents inoculated with SDP. p, the significance of the difference between CDP and SDP groups.
Table 3. Results of xenodiagnosis experiments performed with P. orientalis in the four rodent species infected with L. donovani.
Table 3. Results of xenodiagnosis experiments performed with P. orientalis in the four rodent species infected with L. donovani.
Rodent SpeciesWeek p.i.No. of Animals ExposedNo. of Sand Fly FemalesNo. and % of Positive Females
105 CDP107 CDP
SDP
105 CDP107 CDP
SDP
105 CDP107
CDP

SDP
BALB/c mice10-44-2132-00
15-77-7379-00
20-44-5576-00
25-34-4549-00
30-24-2559-00
219295 00
C. griseus10-44-117-00
15-77-2233-00
20-44-1128-00
25-44-2423-1 (4.21 (4.4)
30-44-2522-2 (8.0)1 (4.6)
93113 3 (3.2)2 (1.8)
M. auratus153333725000
203332620NA 100NA
253336429000
30336131460000
4845114000
L. lagurus153339174000
20333143NA00NA
2533314121603 (25.0)4 (25.0)
3033614142708 (57.1)5 (18.5)
514647011 (23.9)9 (19.1)
1 not analyzed.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vojtkova, B.; Spitzova, T.; Votypka, J.; Lestinova, T.; Kominkova, I.; Hajkova, M.; Santos-Mateus, D.; Miles, M.A.; Volf, P.; Sadlova, J. Central Asian Rodents as Model Animals for Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani Research. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1440. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091440

AMA Style

Vojtkova B, Spitzova T, Votypka J, Lestinova T, Kominkova I, Hajkova M, Santos-Mateus D, Miles MA, Volf P, Sadlova J. Central Asian Rodents as Model Animals for Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani Research. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(9):1440. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091440

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vojtkova, Barbora, Tatiana Spitzova, Jan Votypka, Tereza Lestinova, Iveta Kominkova, Michaela Hajkova, David Santos-Mateus, Michael A. Miles, Petr Volf, and Jovana Sadlova. 2020. "Central Asian Rodents as Model Animals for Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani Research" Microorganisms 8, no. 9: 1440. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091440

APA Style

Vojtkova, B., Spitzova, T., Votypka, J., Lestinova, T., Kominkova, I., Hajkova, M., Santos-Mateus, D., Miles, M. A., Volf, P., & Sadlova, J. (2020). Central Asian Rodents as Model Animals for Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani Research. Microorganisms, 8(9), 1440. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091440

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop