Next Article in Journal
Novel Psychrophiles and Exopolymers from Permafrost Thaw Lake Sediments
Next Article in Special Issue
Yogurt Produced by Novel Natural Starter Cultures Improves Gut Epithelial Barrier In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Molecular Evolution of Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV): Subdivision of HMPV A2b Strains
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low-Carbohydrate Tolerant LAB Strains Identified from Rumen Fluid: Investigation of Probiotic Activity and Legume Silage Fermentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Composition and Metabolic Functions of the Microbiome in Fermented Grain during Light-Flavor Baijiu Fermentation

1
MOE Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
3
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Food Science and Engineering College, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 100026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(9), 1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091281
Submission received: 19 July 2020 / Revised: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 22 August 2020

Abstract

:
The metabolism and accumulation of flavor compounds in Chinese Baijiu are driven by microbiota succession and their inter-related metabolic processes. Changes in the microbiome composition during Baijiu production have been examined previously; however, the respective metabolic functions remain unclear. Using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics, we examined the microbial and metabolic characteristics during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation to assess the correlations between microorganisms and their potential functions. During fermentation, the bacterial abundance increased from 58.2% to 97.65%, and fermentation resulted in the accumulation of various metabolites, among which alcohols and esters were the most abundant. Correlation analyses revealed that the levels of major metabolites were positively correlated with bacterial abundance but negatively with that of fungi. Gene annotation showed that the Lactobacillus species contained key enzyme genes for carbohydrate metabolism and contributed to the entire fermentation process. Lichtheimia ramosa, Saccharomycopsis fibuligera, Bacillus licheniformis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Pichia kudriavzevii play major roles in starch degradation and ethanol production. A link was established between the composition and metabolic functions of the microbiota involved in Baijiu fermentation, which helps elucidate microbial and metabolic patterns of fermentation and provides insights into the potential optimization of Baijiu production.

1. Introduction

Baijiu, a traditional fermented alcoholic beverage, is very popular in China. As is the case with all naturally fermented food products, changes in the microbiome composition during fermentation are essential for the development and final quality of Baijiu [1,2]. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the structure and metabolic function of the microbiome so as to better understand the mechanisms underlying fermentation. Moreover, a comprehensive understanding of food microbiota may help elucidate microbial ecology and evolution in more natural, complex ecosystems [3,4,5]. Thus, there is increasing interest in uncovering the characteristics of Baijiu-making microbiota and revealing the important effects of changes in microbiota on Baijiu fermentation [1,6].
Chinese Baijiu can be classified into different categories based on their flavor profiles, in which sauce-flavor Baijiu, strong-flavor Baijiu, and light-flavor Baijiu comprise the three dominating categories [6]. Light-flavor Baijiu is famous for its pure, pleasantly fruity, and mild taste, and for its refreshing aftertaste [7], which have made it the predominant type of Baijiu in the Chinese liquor market [1,8]. Light-flavor Baijiu is produced in an open solid-state fermentation process. Typically, sorghum is used as raw material to which low-temperature Daqu, the fermentation starter for Chinese Baijiu, is added as culture starter, and fermentation is allowed to occur in large earthenware containers. Fermented grain is subsequently distilled to produce Baijiu [6]. During light-flavor Baijiu fermentation, microorganisms originating from Daqu and from the environment, such as Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Saccharomycopsis, Saccharomyces, Pichia, Wickerhamomyces, and Aspergillus, were found to be predominant [9,10].
In previous studies, culture-dependent and -independent methods were used to describe the microbial community in Daqu and during the fermentation process of light-flavor Baijiu [9,10,11,12]. The functions of particular species characterized in a simulated environment differed substantially from those of species in situ [13,14]. In the past few decades, high-throughput amplicon sequencing has helped to uncover and analyze additional microorganisms that participate in Baijiu fermentation [6,8,9,15]. However, amplicon sequencing only provides limited information on microbial metabolic functions [16], whereas shotgun metagenomic sequencing approaches offer a higher resolution regarding taxonomic annotation, circumvent amplification biases, and provide a higher taxonomic accuracy at the species level [17,18]. Moreover, this method facilitates elucidating the functional distribution of microbiota through non-selective genomic assembly followed by gene annotation [19,20]. This approach has thus been applied in a few studies to reveal potential metabolic functions in fermented food products, including sausage [21], milk Kefirs [18], pu-erh tea [22], and various cheeses [23,24].
In the current study, shotgun metagenomic sequencing, metabolomic analyses, and gene annotation were used to investigate the microbial and metabolic characteristics during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation and further to assess the mechanistic correlations between microbial community composition and fermentation functions. The key microorganisms of Baijiu fermentation and potential metabolic functions of microorganisms were identified. Our results may help increase the production efficiency and improve the quality and flavor of the final product.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

During light-flavor Baijiu production, fermented grain samples were collected from Shanxi Xinghuacun Fenjiu Distillery Co., Ltd. (Fenyang, China) in 2017. Light-flavor Baijiu is fermented with sorghum as a raw material and Daqu as a starter culture in earthen jars. Daqu is a saccharifying and fermenting agent which is prepared by solid-substrate fermentation from barley and peas [11]. The diameter and depth of a jar are 0.8 and 1.2 m, respectively, with the capacity of 260 L. It takes approximately 28 days for light-flavor Baijiu to ferment [25]. In one fermentation batch, approximately 500 g of fermented grain samples were randomly taken from the center of the middle layer of each jar on days 1, 7, 15, and 28. The opened jars were subsequently eliminated from the study. Three independent batches were sampled for adequate representation.

2.2. Microbiological and Physicochemical Analysis

Changes in the physicochemical properties of fermented grain, including moisture content, pH, core temperature, and acidity, were measured as described by Pang et al. [6]. Fermented grain samples (10 g) were placed in an appropriate peptone physiological salt solution to determine the population of microorganisms using selective media. The viable cell counts of total aerobic bacteria were enumerated on Plate Count Agar at 30 °C for 24 h. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts were performed on de Man, Rogosa, Sharpe Agar (MRSA) with 500 μg/mL of natamycin at 30 °C for 48 h. Yeasts and molds were enumerated on Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar with 100 mg/L of chloramphenicol at 28 °C for 48–72 h [11].

2.3. Polar Non-Volatile Metabolite Analysis

The polar non-volatile compounds in fermented grain were assayed using the proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR). Metabolites were extracted by suspending 300 mg of fermented grain in 1.5 mL of cold ultra-pure water (Milli-Q; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), followed by grinding using a Mini-Beadbeater for 60 s and cooling on ice for 10 min. After centrifugation at 13,000× g for 10 min, 1.0 mL of supernatant was mixed with 1.0 mL of phosphate buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate consisting of 10% deuterium oxide (D2O) (v/v), 100 mM of imidazole, 0.2% (w/v) sodium azide, and 1 mM of trimethylsilylpropionate ([Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA] as an internal standard)), which was then centrifuged at 16,060× g and 4 °C for 5 min. Then, 600 μL of the supernatant was transferred to 5 mm NMR tubes. The NMR spectra were recorded using an Avance III 600 FT-NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at 14.1 T (600.13 MHz proton frequency). The experimental NMR spectra were compared with those of known metabolites using the Chenomx NMR Suite software (version 6.0; Chenomx, Edmonton, AB, Canada) to identify the metabolites.

2.4. Volatile Compound Analysis

The volatile compounds in fermented grain were analyzed using an Agilent 6890 GC equipped with a 5975B series mass spectrometric detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). A 50:30 mm DVB-CAR-PDMS SPME fiber (Supelco Co., Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used for headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Briefly, 2 g of the fermented grain sample was added to 8 mL of Milli-Q water. After ultrasonic wave treatment for 30 min, the sample was centrifuged at 6500× g and 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant (8 mL) was transferred to a 20 mL vial containing 2 μL of 4-methyl-2-pentanol (125.0 mg/L) as an internal standard and 3 g of sodium chloride. Volatile compounds were collected for 45 min at 50 °C, followed by GC-MS analysis [26]. Volatile compounds were identified by matching with the NIST 14 mass spectral database and were quantified with 4-methyl-2-pentanol as an internal standard.

2.5. DNA Extraction and Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing

Samples from each time point were thoroughly mixed, and then 5 g of each fermented grain sample was placed in 30 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (120 mM, pH = 8.0) and then shaken at 200× g for 30 min. A series of centrifugation steps were executed to enrich the microbial cells in the samples. First, the suspension was centrifuged at 200× g for 5 min, and the pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline. Microbial cells in the suspension were collected by centrifugation at 9000× g for 10 min to pellet microbial cells, followed by three washing steps.
DNA was isolated using a CTAB-based method. The microbial pellet of each sample was resuspended using 1 mL of CTAB lysis buffer (0.1 M of Tris-HCl, 0.1 M of EDTA, 0.1 M of Na3PO4, 1.5 M of Na Cl, 1% w/v CTAB (pH = 8), 5 μL of proteinase K (20 mg/mL), 10 μL of lysozyme (50 mg/mL), 10 μL of lyticase (10 u/mL), and 5 μL of RNase A (10 mg/mL)). The samples were then transferred to bead-beating tubes containing 0.3 g glass beads (0.3 mm diameter) and were homogenized using a Mini-Beadbeater twice for 2 min. After this, the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 1.5 h under horizontal shaking at 200× g. Two hundred microliters of 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added to each sample, followed by incubation at 65 °C for 1 h while gently inverting each tube every 20 min. DNA was extracted using two extraction steps with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1 v/v) and was precipitated for 1.5 h using 0.6 volumes of pre-cooled isopropanol. Each DNA pellet was washed thrice using pre-cooled 70% ethanol. DNA was eluted using 30 μL of ultra-pure water (Milli-Q).
Sequencing was performed at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sequence libraries were fragmented to an average size of approximately 300 bp using a Covaris M220 ultrasonicator device (Gene Company Limited, Beijing China) and were tagged with sequencing adapters using a TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina).

2.6. Sequence Assembly, Taxonomic and Functional Annotation

To improve the accuracy of subsequent analysis, the adapter sequences were trimmed off on the 3′- and 5′-ends using the SeqPrep software. Sickle software was used to remove low-quality reads shorter than 50 bp with a quality value below 20 or with ambiguous base calls. Clean reads were assembled into contigs using the MEGAHIT software and multiple k-mer lengths [27]. The contigs shorter than 300 bp were excluded. Putative open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using MetaGene and were clustered using CD-HIT with a 95% sequence identity and 90% coverage [28]. A non-redundant gene catalog was compiled from each cluster. Sequences were aligned against a non-redundant gene catalog using SOAPaligner at a 95% sequence identity to assess the gene abundance [29], and the gene abundance in each sample was calculated and normalized via the Reads Per Kilobase of per Million mapped reads (RPKM) [30]. The sequence data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the project accession number PRJNA630248.
Taxonomic annotation was performed against the NCBI nr database using DIAMOND (http://www.diamondsearch.org/index.php, version 0.8.35) BLASTp with an e-value threshold of 1e−5 [31]. The EggNOG (version 4.5) [32], CAZy (version 5.0) [33], and KEGG (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) databases [34] were employed for functional annotation using the same threshold value. The KOBAS 2.0 software was used to conduct a KEGG pathway mapping analysis [35]. The functional genes (i.e., enzyme-encoding genes) associated with fermentation were annotated, and the relative abundance of functional microorganisms at different times during fermentation was calculated using the total relative abundance of certain functional genes at different times as 100%.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Data were tested by conducting a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test using SPSS (version 20.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the SIMCA software (version 14.0; Umetricus AB, Umea, Sweden). The microbial communities at species level in fermented grain were visualized using Circos (version 0.69–6). The orthogonal projection to latent structure discriminant analysis model (O2PLS) was used to estimate the relationship between the microbial species and polar water-soluble compounds and volatile compounds, respectively, which consisted of the simultaneous projection of both the microbial species (X) and metabolites (Y) during Baijiu fermentation with SIMCA-14.0 [36]. The correlation matrix shows the pair-wise correlation between all variables (X and Y). The microbial species with variable importance in the projection (VIP) value > 1.0, were the most associated for explaining the metabolites. The significance of correlation coefficient was calculated via Origin 8.0 (OriginLab Cor., Northampton, MA, USA). Only the significant correlations of data were presented and discussed. A high correlation coefficient (|ρ| ≥ 0.8, p < 0.05) between the microbial species (VIP > 1) and metabolites was visualized via Cytoscape (v.3.4.0). Heatmaps of the gene abundance annotated using eggNOG and the KEGG database were produced using the pheatmap package with Z-score normalization in R [37].

3. Results

3.1. General Investigation of Microbiota and Physicochemical Properties

The culture-based microbial abundance estimates and physicochemical properties of fermented grain provided the first insights into the microbial composition and metabolic changes, which offered a basis for further omics analyses. During light-flavor Baijiu fermentation, the grain was transformed from loose, large sorghum particles to a watery, sticky substance (Figure 1a). The total numbers of bacteria, fungi, LAB, and yeasts were 6.86, 6.04, 6.29, and 5.01 log CFU/g, respectively, on day 1. All of these groups reached their maximum abundance by day 7. No molds were detected after day 7. The total population of bacteria was higher than that of yeasts, at approximately 3 log CFU/g on day 28 (Figure 1b). The physicochemical properties indicated the progress of the fermentation and reflected the quality of the fermented grains [38]. During fermentation, the moisture content and acidity continually increased, while the pH decreased (Figure 1c). The temperature increased rapidly from the start of the fermentation to day 7 and then decreased gradually to 24 °C on day 28.

3.2. Microbial Composition and Dynamics Based on Shotgun Metagenomics

The sequencing of metagenomic libraries from the microbiota of fermented grain samples collected on days 1, 7, 15, and 28 produced a total of 539 million clean reads with each sequencing depth of 10 Gb. Details on the numbers of reads per sample are shown in Table S1. Taxonomic annotation was performed to reveal the microbial diversity during Baiiju fermentation. Shotgun metagenomics can help examine relative abundances at the domain level of microbial communities, which would reflect variations in the microbial populations [39]. At the start of the fermentation process, the abundance of fungi and bacteria was 58.23% and 41.70%, respectively (Figure 2a). The relative abundance of bacteria rapidly increased to 94.56% until day 7 and remained predominant until the end of the fermentation process (97.65%), whereas that of fungi decreased to 2.30%. Microbial diversity decreased sharply during fermentation. At a relative abundance of >1%, we observed 70 genera and 136 species at the beginning of the fermentation, and only 12 genera and 53 species at the end of the fermentation (Table S2). Lactobacillus, Pichia, Lichtheimia, Leuconostoc, Rhizopus, and Bacillus were predominant on day 1 and, among these, only Lactobacillus and Pichia showed a relative abundance of >10%. The relative abundance of Lactobacillus had increased to 79.62% by day 7, and it became the most abundant taxon until the end of fermentation, accounting for 92.02% of the total abundance at the genus level (Figure 2b). At the species level, p. kudravzerii, Li. ramosa, Le. citreum, and B. licheniformis were predominant on day 1. La. acetotolerans, La. buchneri, and La. hilgardii increased and were predominant at the end of the fermentation (Figure 2c). Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which was the main producer of ethanol, occurred at a relative abundance of 6.68% to 62.26% of all fungi from the beginning to the end of the fermentation (Table S3).

3.3. Metabolic Succession during Light-Flavor Baijiu Fermentation

Metabolites in fermented grain produce the aroma of Baijiu, either directly or as a precursor, and the succession of metabolites is affected by the microbiota changes during fermentation [21]. To gain a broad understanding of the metabolite changes in fermented grains during fermentation, both polar water-soluble metabolites and volatile compounds were analyzed. A total of 54 polar water-soluble metabolites, including carbonic and nitrogen compounds, was annotated at different fermentation stages, including 4 alcohols, 6 sugars, 23 organic acids, 3 alditols, 6 amino acids, and 12 other compounds (Table S4). Among these six categories, the concentrations of alcohols and amino acids increased from day 1 to day 15; organic acids and alditol increased throughout the fermentation process, whereas sugars increased until day 15 and then decreased until day 28 (Figure 3a). Sugars and organic acids were the main metabolites at the beginning of fermentation, with relative abundances of 45.14% and 25.38%, respectively; however, these abundance substantially decreased to 18.43% and 11.04% (p < 0.05) by day 7. Meanwhile, alcohols were the predominant compounds from day 7 to day 28, at an abundance of 67.67% (Figure 3b). Based on the profile of these compounds, a principal components analysis (PCA) plot was produced to characterize the different fermentation periods of fermented grain (Figure 3c). The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained more than 85% of the total variance. The fermented grain collected on day 1 was separated from all the other samples, suggesting that the most substantial changes in the polar metabolites occurred during the first seven days.
Furthermore, 112 volatile compounds were identified and quantified in fermented grains, including 42 esters, 27 alcohols, 16 acids, 13 aldo-ketones, 5 phenols, and 9 heterocyclic compounds (Table S5). The concentrations of esters, alcohols, acids, and phenols peaked on day 15 and gradually decreased until day 28. The aldo-ketone concentrations continuously increased, and those of heterocycles fluctuated during fermentation (Figure 3d). Esters were the main volatile compounds during fermentation, with relative abundances ranging from 52.99% on day 1 to 55.39% on day 28. The relative abundance of alcohols increased until day 7 and then decreased during the remaining time period. The concentrations of acids, aldo-ketones, phenols, and heterocycles were reduced by day 7 and then remained relatively constant until the end of fermentation (Figure 3e). A PCA analysis was conducted to relate different times of fermentation to concentrations of volatile compounds. The first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 49.7% and 23.9% of the total variance, respectively. The biplot suggested that alcohols, esters, and acids were responsible for the separation of fermented grains at different fermentation stages (Figure 3f).

3.4. Correlations of Microorganisms and Metabolites in Fermented Grain

To explore the microbial functions during fermentation, the O2PLS-DA model was constructed for the correlation analysis between microbial species and metabolites, including both polar water-soluble compounds and flavor compounds (Tables S6 and S7). The R2Y and Q2 of the polar and water-soluble compounds model were 0.973 and 0.981, respectively, and those of the volatile compounds were 0.888 and 0.705, respectively. The VIP of microbial species is displayed in Figure S1. A total of 139 significant correlations (correlation coefficient ≥ |0.8|, p < 0.05) between microbial species (VIP > 1) and metabolites are displayed in Figure 4. Most LABs showed positive correlations with the metabolites; for instance, La. acetotolerans and La. parabuchneri were positively correlated with ethanol production; La. acetotolerans, La. buchneri, La. odoratitofui, La. hilgardii, La. similis, and La. parabuchneri showed a positive correlation with glucose and lactate; La. odoratitofui, La. Hilgardii, and La. diolivorans were positively correlated with acetate (Figure 4a). La. brevis was positively correlated with ethyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, pentanoic acid, ethyl ester, ethyl benzeneacetate, 2-methyl-1-propanol, and 4-ethyl phenol (Figure 4b), whereas La. paralimentarius exhibited negative correlations with most metabolites. Most fungi showed negative correlations with the majority of metabolites, apart from Pichia kudriavzevii Li. ramose, Rhizopus delemar, and Hanseniaspora uvarum, which produced positive correlations with sucrose, galactonate, galactitol, maltose, and acetone.

3.5. Functional Gene Categories of Microbiota in Fermented Grain

To interpret the observed correlation between the microorganisms and metabolites, the distribution of metabolic functional genes in fermented grain was annotated using the COG, CAZy, and KEGG databases, respectively. Regarding functional prediction, 1,847,233 ORFs were found, and the total and average lengths of these genes were 875 Mbp and 473.57 bp, respectively. Within the COG category related to metabolism, the relative abundance of carbohydrate, amino acid, lipid, and nucleotide transport and metabolism showed an increasing trend from the beginning of the fermentation process until day 7, and then remained stable until the end of the experiment (Figure S2). According to the CAZy database annotation, the abundance of genes associated with carbohydrate esterase, glycoside hydrolases, glycosyl transferases, and carbohydrate-binding modules increased from the beginning of the fermentation until day 7, while the auxiliary activities and polysaccharide lyases decreased. After day 7, the respective abundance of all the enzyme families was constant or decreased slightly (Figure S3). The metabolic pathways and potential functional enzymes were annotated by KEGG pathway mapping. The functional genes in fermentation were divided into 13 categories at level 2, and carbohydrate metabolism was found to be the most abundant category (Figure 5a). The majority of genes for carbohydrate metabolism increased by day 15 and then remained constant until the end of fermentation. The enzymes in the carbohydrate metabolism categories, including starch and sucrose metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism, and some carbolic-ester hydrolases, are essential for Baijiu fermentation [40]. Within the category of starch and sucrose metabolism, the relative abundance of enzyme-encoding genes for α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) increased from day 1 to day 7 and then decreased until the end of the fermentation (Figure 5b). The relative abundance of genes for glucoamylase (EC 3.2.1.3) decreased throughout the fermentation process, and the relative abundance of enzyme-encoding genes for β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) decreased during the first 15 days, but slightly increased until the end of fermentation. The majority of enzymes encoding genes associated with the pentose phosphate pathway and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis showed an increasing trend during the first 15 days. Carboxylic-ester hydrolases are the most important contributors to flavor compound formation. The relative abundance of the triacylglycerol lipase (EC 3.1.1.3)-encoding genes decreased throughout the fermentation process, whereas the carboxylesterase (EC 3.1.1.1)-encoding genes generally increased.

3.6. Metabolic Potential of Microbiota in Fermented Grain

To further explore the metabolic potential and the respective microorganisms during fermentation, the most abundant pathways, enzymes, and dominant microorganisms associated with the respective enzymes were identified, and a metabolic illustration was produced (Figure 6). These metabolic processes can be divided into three stages: (i) starch and cellulose degradation, (ii) alcoholic production, and (iii) flavor development. There were three main pathways for starch degradation in which α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) was required. The dominant microorganisms containing α-amylase genes were Saccharomycopsis fibuligera, B. licheniformis, and Li. ramosa at the beginning of the fermentation, and La. plantarum in the following days. Since sorghum is the main raw material, cellulose hydrolysis is also important during fermentation, and B. licheniformis and Li. ramosa were associated with cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4), while the dominant microorganisms producing β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) varied on day 1, with Saccharomycopsis fibuligera being the most abundant. After this, La. Buchneri, and La. brevis were the dominant β-glucosidase-producing microorganisms. During alcoholic fermentation, alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) and alcohol dehydrogenase (NADP+) (EC1.1.1.2) were the most abundant enzymes for ethanol production. The predominant species producing these enzymes were La. acetotolerans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and P. kudriavzevii. In addition, P. kudriavzevii also primarily participated in acetaldehyde formation, which was a precursor of ethanol. For instance, La. plantarum, La. acetotolerans, and La. brevis contributed to L-lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) and acetate kinase (EC 2.7.2.1), which are required for lactate and acetate formation. After the accumulation of the precursors, flavor compounds were produced. The dominant genera producing carboxylesterase (EC 3.1.1.1) were Lactobacillus, including La. plantarum and La. brevis at the early stage, and La. odoratitofui from day 7 to day 28.

4. Discussion

Optimizing the fermentation process of food products is challenging because of the complex composition and succession of the microbiota [1,2,21]. Unraveling the functionality of the microbiota is fundamental to manipulating the community so as to produce the desired outcome, and this is the theoretical basis of solid-state fermentation mechanisms [22,40]. Our results contribute to an understanding of the microbial mechanisms during solid-substrate Baijiu fermentation and offer potential guidance for improving Baijiu quality via fermentation.
Coupling metagenomics with plate-counting techniques provided a clear overview of the microbial population. Compared with fungi, the bacteria at the late stage of fermentation were dominant. Notably, metagenomic sequencing showed that bacteria represented over 90% of all the microorganisms at the end of fermentation. This was in line with the results of culture-dependent analyses (Figure 1b), which was also in agreement with the results of a previous study [41]. Microbial composition during Baijiu fermentation has been investigated using multiple approaches, however, most previous studies produced taxonomic identification only at the genus level [6,9,42,43]. Over the time of fermentation, the microbial diversity decreased rapidly due to environmental factors, including nutrient limitation, high ethanol concentrations, and low pH values [44], and only Lactobacillus and several yeasts survived until the end of the process.
Considering that microbiota drive the fermentation process, functional microorganisms—i.e., metabolically active microorganisms—and their dynamics appear to be more important than the microbial composition [21]. We combined two metabolomic approaches in order to detect metabolites to improve our understanding of the biochemical processes involved in fermentation [45]. The concentration of the majority of metabolites, such as alcohols, esters, acids, amino acids, and phenols, that accumulated in fermented grain increased during the first 15 days, and then remained stable or decreased. Moreover, based on the PCA analysis of metabolites, there was an obvious shift from day 1 to day 7. Subsequently, to reveal the metabolic functions of the microbiota at gene level, functional gene categories were identified and annotated using sequence data. Shotgun metagenomics can provide strong evidence for functional predictions [16,40]. We found that the abundance of genes associated with metabolism generally increased during the first 15 days, as annotated using different databases. Considering microbial composition dynamics, the most critical changes in both microorganisms and metabolites may be speculated to occur during the first 15th days. This finding suggests that fermentation time during the solid-state fermentation process of light-flavor Baijiu may be reduced.
Based on the observed relationships between microorganisms and metabolites as well as functional gene annotation associated with the metabolic potential of microbial species, it was found that lactic acid bacteria were the predominant bacteria in light-flavor Baijiu fermentation, particularly Lactobacillus. Different Lactobacillus species contributed to the fermentation process. La. plantarum provided enzyme-encoding genes for starch degradation, and some Lactobacillus species such as La. buchneri and La. collinoides contributed to the production of β-glucosidase (EC3.2.1.21), which is associated with cellulose degradation and completes hydrolysis by converting cellobiose to glucose [46]. In addition, β-glucosidase can improve the production of some terpenes, which enhance floral aroma characteristics [47]. La. plantarum was reported to produce high-yield extracellular α-amylase for starch degradation, following isolation from Nigerian fermented products [48]. At the alcohol production stage, Lactobacillus mainly contributed to pyruvate metabolism associated with lactic acid, acetic acid, and acetyl-CoA production, which has been well studied previously [49]. Interestingly, the genes of La. acetotolerans strongly contributed to alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) production, which is responsible for ethanol production during the fermentation of food products [21]. Meanwhile, La. acetotolerans was positively correlated with ethanol (Figure 4a). Lactobacillus was previously found to simultaneously produce lactate, ethanol, and acetate [50]. A high abundance of genes encoding alcohol dehydrogenases could explain why La. acetotolerans was predominant at the late stage of fermentation, suggesting that this species was generally tolerant to high ethanol concentrations. Specific cultures of La. acetotolerans could be adapted to ethanol concentrations of more than 12% (v/v) [51]. Some Lactobacillus species such as La. odoratitofui, La. plantarum, and La. brevis contributed to carboxylesterases (EC3.1.1.1), which are responsible for ester formation and are important enzymes enhancing the flavor of fermented food products [52]. Ethyl esters are the most typical flavor compounds of light-flavor Baijiu [53]. La. paralimentarius was only abundant on day 1 and then almost disappeared during fermentation (Table S3). This may explain why it produced a negative correlation with most metabolites and did not play a significantly role in gene functional annotations. These results imply that Lactobacillus groups with multiple functions are vital for light-flavor Baijiu production, but further research would be needed, including, for instance, fortified fermentation with Lactobacillus species but avoiding excessive acidification.
In addition to Lactobacillus, B. licheniformis is also a functional species during fermentation, and it is known for starch and degradation functions due to its prominent ability to produce α-amylase and cellulase under a wide range of pHs and temperatures [54]. Although fungi only accounted for a small proportion of the total microorganisms from day 7 day to the end of fermentation (Figure 2), they were crucial for starch degradation and alcoholic fermentation, and they provided precursors for the synthesis of flavor compounds. In particular, all the microorganisms associated with the production of glucoamylase (EC 3.2.1.3) were fungi, including Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and P. kudriavzevii (Figure 6). Furthermore, P. kudriavzevii contributed to acetate, acetaldehyde, and ethanol formation in the pyruvate metabolism. Saccharomycopsis fibuligera is a major amylolytic yeast in the food industry which can assimilate multiple carbohydrate sources such as glucose, sucrose, cellobiose, and soluble starch [55]. P. kudriavzevii has shown multi-stress tolerance, and it is known to produce organic acids during wine fermentation [56]. Furthermore, P. kudriavzevii has been reported to contribute to ester formation during Baijiu production [57]. However, in the current study, P. kudriavzevii mainly participated in the synthesis of flavor compound precursors. In addition to the main producer of ethanol, Saccharomyces cerevisiae played a role in the conversion of acetyl-CoA and acetaldehyde, to which flavor compound formation was attributed. Li. ramosa was predominant in starch degradation by the potential production of α-amylase, glucoamylase, and cellulase, which has been demonstrated in previous studies [58,59].
In conclusion, microbiomes in a light-flavor Baijiu fermentation were systematically investigated via the combination of shotgun metagenomics and metabolomics. The microbial structure and characteristic metabolites were examined during fermentation. The microbe–metabolite relationship was established, and the further metabolic potential of core microbial species were constructed. Lichtheimia ramose, Saccharomycopsis fibuligera, and Bacillus licheniformis contributed the most to starch saccharification. Yeasts, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kudriavzevii, were responsible for ethanol formation. Different kinds of Lactobacillus species, such as La. plantarum, La. Brevis, and La. odoratitofui, contributed to fermentation and acted as the main flavor-producing microorganisms potentially during the late stage of fermentation. This work provides information for the fermentation mechanism of Chinese Baijiu and contributes a further step to high and uniform product quality.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/9/1281/s1: Figure S1: Heatmap of correlation analysis between microbial species and metabolites. Figure S2: Changes of function distribution annotated by COG database during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. Figure S3: Changes of function distribution annotated by CAZy database. Table S1: Statistics of the metagenomic sequencing after quality trimming from fermented grain samples. Table S2: The number of genus and species in fermented grain detected by shotgun metagenomic sequence. Table S3: Relative abundance of dominant bacteria and fungi in fermented grain, perspectival (>1%). Table S4: Concentration of polar non-volatile metabolites in fermented grain by 1H NMR. Table S5: Concentration of volatile compounds in fermented grain by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Table S6: O2PLS correlation matrix and P value between microbial species and polar, water soluble compounds. Table S7: O2PLS correlation matrix and P value between microbial species and volatile compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H. and J.C.; methodology, X.H. and Y.F.; formal analysis, X.H. and J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, X.H.; writing—review and editing, T.L., J.C., and X.P.; supervision, J.C. and B.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31671829 and No. 31972975).

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaoyong Wang and Xin Zhang from Shanxi Xinghuacun Fen-jiu Group Company for fermented grain sampling assistance and advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jin, G.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Y. Mystery behind Chinese liquor fermentation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 63, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, M.; Su, X.Q.; Nian, B.; Chen, L.J.; Zhang, D.L.; Duan, S.M.; Wang, L.Y.; Shi, X.Y.; Jiang, B.; Jiang, W.W. Integrated meta-omics approaches to understand the microbiome of spontaneous fermentation of traditional Chinese Pu-erh tea. MSystems 2019, 4, e00680-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wolfe, B.E.; Dutton, R.J. Fermented foods as experimentally tractable microbial ecosystems. Cell 2015, 161, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Blasche, S.; Kim, Y.; Mars, R.; Kafkia, E.; Maansson, M.; Machado, D.; Teusink, B.; Nielsen, J.; Benes, V.; Neves, R. Emergence of stable coexistence in a complex microbial community through metabolic cooperation and spatio-temporal niche partitioning. bioRxiv 2019, 541870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cosetta, C.M.; Wolfe, B.E. Deconstructing and reconstructing cheese rind microbiomes for experiments in microbial ecology and evolution. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2020, 56, e95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pang, X.N.; Han, B.Z.; Huang, X.N.; Zhang, X.; Hou, L.F.; Cao, M.; Gao, L.J.; Hu, G.H.; Chen, J.Y. Effect of the environment microbiota on the flavour of light-flavour Baijiu during spontaneous fermentation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zheng, X.W.; Tabrizi, M.R.; Nout, M.R.; Han, B.Z. Daqu-a traditional Chinese liquor fermentation starter. J. Inst. Brew. 2011, 117, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.R.; Ma, E.B.; Yan, L.Z.; Meng, H.; Du, X.W.; Zhang, S.W.; Quan, Z.X. Bacterial and fungal diversity in the traditional Chinese liquor fermentation process. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 146, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, X.; Du, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. Environmental microbiota drives microbial succession and metabolic profiles during Chinese liquor fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02369-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, H.; Xu, Y. Microbial succession and metabolite changes during the fermentation of Chinese light aroma-style liquor. J. Inst. Brew. 2019, 125, 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zheng, X.W.; Yan, Z.; Han, B.Z.; Zwietering, M.H.; Samson, R.A.; Boekhout, T.; Robert Nout, M.J. Complex microbiota of a Chinese “Fen” liquor fermentation starter (Fen-Daqu), revealed by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Food Microbiol. 2012, 31, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zheng, X.W.; Yan, Z.; Nout, M.R.; Smid, E.J.; Zwietering, M.H.; Boekhout, T.; Han, J.S.; Han, B.Z. Microbiota dynamics related to environmental conditions during the fermentative production of Fen-Daqu, a Chinese industrial fermentation starter. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 182, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. De Roy, K.; Marzorati, M.; Van Den Abbeele, P.; Van De Wiele, T.; Boon, N. Synthetic microbial ecosystems: An exciting tool to understand and apply microbial communities. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1472–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tan, J.; Zuniga, C.; Zengler, K. Unraveling interactions in microbial communities-from co-cultures to microbiomes. J. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fan, G.; Sun, B.; Fu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Huang, M.; Xu, C.; Li, X. Analysis of physicochemical indices, volatile flavor components, and microbial community of a light-flavor Daqu. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2018, 76, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ellegaard, K.M.; Engel, P. Genomic diversity landscape of the honey bee gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tedersoo, L.; Anslan, S.; Bahram, M.; Põlme, S.; Riit, T.; Liiv, I.; Kõljalg, U.; Kisand, V.; Nilsson, R.H.; Hildebrand, F. Shotgun metagenomes and multiple primer pair-barcode combinations of amplicons reveal biases in metabarcoding analyses of fungi. MycoKeys 2015, 10, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Verce, M.; De Vuyst, L.; Weckx, S. Shotgun metagenomics of a water kefir fermentation ecosystem reveals a novel Oenococcus species. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Filippo, C.; Ramazzotti, M.; Fontana, P.; Cavalieri, D. Bioinformatic approaches for functional annotation and pathway inference in metagenomics data. Brief. Bioinform. 2012, 13, 696–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quince, C.; Walker, A.W.; Simpson, J.T.; Loman, N.J.; Segata, N. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ferrocino, I.; Bellio, A.; Giordano, M.; Macori, G.; Romano, A.; Rantsiou, K.; Decastelli, L.; Cocolin, L. Shotgun metagenomics and volatilome profile of the microbiota of fermented sausages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02120-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Li, Z.; Feng, C.; Luo, X.; Yao, H.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, T. Revealing the influence of microbiota on the quality of Pu-erh tea during fermentation process by shotgun metagenomic and metabolomic analysis. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wolfe, B.; Button, J.; Santarelli, M.; Dutton, R. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell 2014, 158, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Escobar-Zepeda, A.; Sanchez-Flores, A.; Baruch, M.Q. Metagenomic analysis of a Mexican ripened cheese reveals a unique complex microbiota. Food Microbiol. 2016, 57, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, X.W.; Han, B.Z. Baijiu, Chinese liquor: History, classification and manufacture. J. Ethn. Foods 2016, 3, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Le, V.D.; Zheng, X.W.; Chen, J.Y.; Han, B.Z. Characterization of volatile compounds in Fen-Daqu–a traditional Chinese liquor fermentation starter. J. Inst. Brew. 2012, 18, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, D.; Liu, C.M.; Luo, R.; Sadakane, K.; Lam, T.W. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1674–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, W.; Godzik, A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1658–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, R.; Li, Y.; Kristiansen, K.; Wang, J. SOAP: Short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lawson, C.E.; Wu, S.; Bhattacharjee, A.S.; Hamilton, J.J.; McMahon, K.D.; Goel, R.; Daniel, R. Metabolic network analysis reveals microbial community interactions in anammox granules. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buchfink, B.; Xie, C.; Huson, D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jensen, L.J.; Julien, P.; Kuhn, M.; von Mering, C.; Muller, J.; Doerks, T.; Bork, P. EggNOG: Automated construction and annotation of orthologous groups of genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 36 (Suppl. 1), D250–D254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cantarel, B.L.; Coutinho, P.M.; Rancurel, C.; Bernard, T.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D233–D238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kanehisa, M.; Araki, M.; Goto, S.; Hattori, M.; Hirakawa, M.; Itoh, M.; Katayama, T.; Kawashima, S.; Okuda, S.; Tokimatsu, T.; et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D480–D484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xie, C.; Mao, X.; Huang, J.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.; Dong, S.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Li, C.Y.; Wei, L. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Li, Z.; Rui, J.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Dong, L.; Huang, Q.; Huang, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Xuan, P.; et al. Bacterial community succession and metabolite changes during doubanjiang-meju fermentation, a Chinese traditional fermented broad bean (Vicia faba L.) paste. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Quan, J.; Cai, G.; Yang, M.; Zeng, Z.H.; Ding, R.R.; Wang, X.W.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Li, S.; Yang, H.; et al. Exploring the fecal microbial composition and metagenomic functional capacities associated with feed efficiency in commercial DLY pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fan, G.; Du, Y.; Fu, Z.; Chen, M.; Wang, Z.; Liu, P.; Li, X. Characterisation of physicochemical properties, flavour components and microbial community in Chinese Guojing roasted sesame-like flavor Daqu. J. Inst. Brew. 2020, 126, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bulgarelli, D.; Garrido-Oter, R.; Münch, P.C.; Weiman, A.; Dröge, J.; Pan, Y.; Mchardy, A.C.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gan, S.-H.; Yang, F.; Sahu, S.K.; Luo, R.Y.; Liao, S.L.; Wang, H.Y.; Jin, T.; Wang, L.; Zhang, P.F.; Liu, X. Deciphering the composition and function profile of the microbial communities in Chinese Moutai liquor starters. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Nie, Y.; Wu, J.; Xu, Y. Construction of synthetic microbiota for reproducible flavor compound metabolism in Chinese light-aroma-type liquor produced by solid-state fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e03090-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, H.Y.; Zhang, X.J.; Zhao, L.P.; Xu, Y. Analysis and comparison of the bacterial community in fermented grains during the fermentation for two different styles of Chinese liquor. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 2008, 35, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Song, Z.; Du, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. Unraveling core functional microbiota in traditional solid-state fermentation by high-throughput amplicons and meta-transcriptomics sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1294–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, B.; Wu, Q.; Xu, Y. Filamentous fungal diversity and community structure associated with the solid-state fermentation of Chinese Maotai-flavor liquor. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 179, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tomita, S.; Nakamura, T.; Okada, S. NMR-and GC/MS-based metabolomic characterization of sunki, an unsalted fermented pickle of turnip leaves. Food Chem. 2018, 258, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zang, X.; Liu, M.; Fan, Y.; Xu, J.; Xu, X.; Li, H. The structural and functional contributions of β-glucosidase-producing microbial communities to cellulose degradation in composting. Biotechnol. Biofuel. 2018, 11, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mateo, J.; Maicas, S. Application of non-Saccharomyces yeasts to wine-making process. Fermentation 2016, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sanni, A.; Morlon-Guyot, J.; Guyot, J. New efficient amylase-producing strains of Lactobacillus plantarum and L. fermentum isolated from different Nigerian traditional fermented foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 72, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, S.Q. Practical implications of lactate and pyruvate metabolism by lactic acid bacteria in food and beverage fermentations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 83, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, S.; Skinner-Nemec, K.A.; Leathers, T.D. Lactobacillus buchneri strain NRRL B-30929 converts a concentrated mixture of xylose and glucose into ethanol and other products. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 2008, 35, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, X.; Teng, K.; Zhang, J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, T.; Ai, G.; Han, P.; Bai, F.; Zhong, J. Transcriptome responses of Lactobacillus acetotolerans F28 to a short and long term ethanol stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sood, S.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, N.; Kanwar, S. Carboxylesterases: Sources, characterization and broader applications. Insights Enzym. Res. 2016, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, H.; Sun, B. Effect of fermentation processing on the flavor of Baijiu. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 5425–5432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Awasthi, M.K.; Wong, J.W.; Kumar, S.; Awasthi, S.K.; Wang, Q.; Wang, M.; Ren, X.; Zhao, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Z. Biodegradation of food waste using microbial cultures producing thermostable α-amylase and cellulase under different pH and temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 248, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chi, Z.; Chi, Z.; Liu, G.; Wang, F.; Ju, L.; Zhang, T. Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and its applications in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Isono, N.; Hayakawa, H.; Usami, A.; Mishima, T.; Hisamatsu, M. A comparative study of ethanol production by Issatchenkia orientalis strains under stress conditions. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2012, 113, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, P.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Z.; Tang, J.; Xu, Y. Bacillus licheniformis affects the microbial community and metabolic profile in the spontaneous fermentation of Daqu starter for Chinese liquor making. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 250, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Carroll, E.; Trinh, T.N.; Son, H.; Lee, Y.W.; Seo, J.A. Comprehensive analysis of fungal diversity and enzyme activity in nuruk, a Korean fermenting starter, for acquiring useful fungi. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Garcia, N.F.L.; Da Silva Santos, F.R.; Bocchini, D.A.; Da Paz, M.F.; Fonseca, G.G.; Leite, R.S.R. Catalytic properties of cellulases and hemicellulases produced by Lichtheimia ramosa: Potential for sugarcane bagasse saccharification. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 122, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of the fermented grains on the 1st, 7th, 15th, and 28th days of light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. (a) Exemplary images of fermented grains; (b) changes in the viable microbial counts of fermented grains; (c) changes in the physicochemical characteristics of fermented grains. F1: fermented grains sampled on the 1st d; F7: fermented grains sampled on the 7th d; F15: fermented grains sampled on the 15th d; F28: fermented grains sampled on the 28th d. Different letters obtained by one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of the fermented grains on the 1st, 7th, 15th, and 28th days of light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. (a) Exemplary images of fermented grains; (b) changes in the viable microbial counts of fermented grains; (c) changes in the physicochemical characteristics of fermented grains. F1: fermented grains sampled on the 1st d; F7: fermented grains sampled on the 7th d; F15: fermented grains sampled on the 15th d; F28: fermented grains sampled on the 28th d. Different letters obtained by one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 08 01281 g001
Figure 2. Taxonomic annotation of the microbiota in fermented grain during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. (a) Distribution of microorganisms at the domain level; (b) distribution of dominant microbial genera (only genera which occurred at >0.5% in at least one sample were shown); (c) distribution of dominant microbial species (only species which occurred at >1% in at least one sample were shown). The green bars at the outer ring represent different samples (F1, F7, F15, and F28, at the right side of the diagram), while others represent for different species. The length and number of the bars on the inner ring represent the percentage of species in each sample. The bands with different colors demonstrate the sources of different species.
Figure 2. Taxonomic annotation of the microbiota in fermented grain during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. (a) Distribution of microorganisms at the domain level; (b) distribution of dominant microbial genera (only genera which occurred at >0.5% in at least one sample were shown); (c) distribution of dominant microbial species (only species which occurred at >1% in at least one sample were shown). The green bars at the outer ring represent different samples (F1, F7, F15, and F28, at the right side of the diagram), while others represent for different species. The length and number of the bars on the inner ring represent the percentage of species in each sample. The bands with different colors demonstrate the sources of different species.
Microorganisms 08 01281 g002
Figure 3. Dynamics of metabolites in the fermented grain in light-flavor Baijiu fermentation, including (a) the concentration and (b) relative abundance of six categories of polar water-soluble compounds detected by 1H NMR; (d) the concentration and (e) relative abundance of six categories of volatile compounds detected by GC-MS; a principal components analysis of (c) polar water-soluble compounds and (f) volatile compounds. Different letters obtained by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Dynamics of metabolites in the fermented grain in light-flavor Baijiu fermentation, including (a) the concentration and (b) relative abundance of six categories of polar water-soluble compounds detected by 1H NMR; (d) the concentration and (e) relative abundance of six categories of volatile compounds detected by GC-MS; a principal components analysis of (c) polar water-soluble compounds and (f) volatile compounds. Different letters obtained by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test indicated significant differences at p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 08 01281 g003
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between the microbial species (VIP > 1) and metabolites by the O2PLS-DA model during Baijiu fermentation. The significant correlated network (|ρ|  ≥  0.8, p < 0.05) between microbial species and (a) polar water-soluble compounds (b) and volatile compounds. The yellow nodes represent the metabolites, the purple nodes represent the bacterial species, and the green nodes represent the fugal species.
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between the microbial species (VIP > 1) and metabolites by the O2PLS-DA model during Baijiu fermentation. The significant correlated network (|ρ|  ≥  0.8, p < 0.05) between microbial species and (a) polar water-soluble compounds (b) and volatile compounds. The yellow nodes represent the metabolites, the purple nodes represent the bacterial species, and the green nodes represent the fugal species.
Microorganisms 08 01281 g004
Figure 5. Functional gene analysis of the fermented grain microbiota in light-flavor Baijiu fermentation based on metagenome annotation. (a) Changes in the function distribution as annotated using the KEGG database; (b) changes in the enzyme-encoding genes as annotated using KEGG within the carbohydrate metabolism category. Heatmap is scaled by the relative abundances for each row (a) and column (b), ranging from low relative abundance to high relative abundance.
Figure 5. Functional gene analysis of the fermented grain microbiota in light-flavor Baijiu fermentation based on metagenome annotation. (a) Changes in the function distribution as annotated using the KEGG database; (b) changes in the enzyme-encoding genes as annotated using KEGG within the carbohydrate metabolism category. Heatmap is scaled by the relative abundances for each row (a) and column (b), ranging from low relative abundance to high relative abundance.
Microorganisms 08 01281 g005
Figure 6. Schematic overview of the metabolic processes with dominant microorganisms during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. For each enzyme, only a microbial relative abundance of >10% in at least one sample is present. “Sa”: Saccharomycopsis; “B”: Bacillus; “Li”: Lichtheimia; “La”: Lactobacillus; “Pe”: Pediococcus; “Sc”: Scheffersomyces; “T”: Torulaspora; “Le”: Leuconostoc; “H”: Hanseniaspora; “Se”: Saccharomyces; “W”: Wickerhamomyces; “Pi”: Pichia; “C”: Candida; “Se”: Saccharomyces.
Figure 6. Schematic overview of the metabolic processes with dominant microorganisms during light-flavor Baijiu fermentation. For each enzyme, only a microbial relative abundance of >10% in at least one sample is present. “Sa”: Saccharomycopsis; “B”: Bacillus; “Li”: Lichtheimia; “La”: Lactobacillus; “Pe”: Pediococcus; “Sc”: Scheffersomyces; “T”: Torulaspora; “Le”: Leuconostoc; “H”: Hanseniaspora; “Se”: Saccharomyces; “W”: Wickerhamomyces; “Pi”: Pichia; “C”: Candida; “Se”: Saccharomyces.
Microorganisms 08 01281 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, X.; Fan, Y.; Lu, T.; Kang, J.; Pang, X.; Han, B.; Chen, J. Composition and Metabolic Functions of the Microbiome in Fermented Grain during Light-Flavor Baijiu Fermentation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091281

AMA Style

Huang X, Fan Y, Lu T, Kang J, Pang X, Han B, Chen J. Composition and Metabolic Functions of the Microbiome in Fermented Grain during Light-Flavor Baijiu Fermentation. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(9):1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Xiaoning, Yi Fan, Ting Lu, Jiamu Kang, Xiaona Pang, Beizhong Han, and Jingyu Chen. 2020. "Composition and Metabolic Functions of the Microbiome in Fermented Grain during Light-Flavor Baijiu Fermentation" Microorganisms 8, no. 9: 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop