Bacterial and Fungal Community Responses to Long-Term Salinity Gradients in Natural Soils of Kazakhstan
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Sampling
2.2. Determination of Soil Physicochemical Properties
2.3. DNA Extraction from Soil, PCR Amplification and Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq Platform
2.4. Bioinformatics and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Soil Chemical Characteristics Along a Salinity Gradient
3.2. Alpha Diversity of Soil Microbial Communities Along the Salinity Gradient
3.3. Beta Diversity of Soil Microbial Communities
3.4. Comparison of Phylum-Level Microbial Communities Among Soil Salinity Classes
3.5. Genus-Level Microbial Community Patterns Along Salinity-Associated Chemical Gradients
3.6. Fungal Community Diversity Along the Salinity Gradient
3.6.1. Alpha Diversity of Fungal Communities
3.6.2. Beta Diversity of Fungal Communities
3.6.3. Phylum-Level Composition of Fungal Communities
3.6.4. Genus-Level Composition of Fungal Communities
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shokri, N.; Hassani, A.; Sahimi, M. Multi-scale soil salinization dynamics from global to pore scale: A review. Rev. Geophys. 2024, 62, e2023RG000804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cuevas, J.; Daliakopoulos, I.N.; del Moral, F.; Hueso, J.J.; Tsanis, I.K. A review of soil-improving cropping systems for soil salinization. Agronomy 2019, 9, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, A. Soil salinity: A global threat to sustainable development. Soil Use Manag. 2022, 38, 39–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- FAO. Global Status of Salt-Affected Soils—Main Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Mwesige, F.F. The extent and distribution of salt-affected soils in sub-Saharan Africa from 1970 to the present: A review of the current state of knowledge. Front. Soil Sci. 2025, 5, 1571243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Negacz, K.; Malek, Ž.; de Vos, A.; Vellinga, P. Saline soils worldwide: Identifying the most promising areas for saline agriculture. J. Arid. Environ. 2022, 203, 104775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hassani, A.; Azapagic, A.; Shokri, N. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, L.; Hu, P.; Zheng, H.; Bai, J.; Liu, Y.; Hellwich, O.; Liu, T.; Chen, X.; Bao, A. An Automated Framework for Interaction Analysis of Driving Factors on Soil Salinization in Central Asia and Western China. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dong, X.; Ding, J.; Ge, X. Future changes in soil salinization across Central Asia under CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Land Degrad. Dev. 2024, 35, 3981–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zheleznova, I.; Gushchina, D.; Meiramov, Z.; Olchev, A. Temporal and spatial variability of dryness conditions in Kazakhstan during 1979–2021 based on reanalysis data. Climate 2022, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Asanbaev, I.K.; Faizov, K.S. Pochvovedenie s Osnovami Ekologii i Geografii Pochv (Soil Science with Basic Soil Ecology and Geography); Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2007; p. 216. [Google Scholar]
- Issanova, G.; Abuduwaili, J.; Mamutov, Z.U.; Kaldybaev, A.; Saparov, G.; Bazarbaeva, T. Saline soils and identification of salt accumulation provinces in Kazakhstan. Arid Ecosyst. 2017, 7, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, Q.; Song, Y.; An, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhong, G. Soil microorganisms: Their role in enhancing crop nutrition and health. Diversity 2024, 16, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Falkowski, P.G.; Fenchel, T.; Delong, E.F. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 2008, 320, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fierer, N. Embracing the unknown: Disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kumawat, C.; Kumar, A.; Parshad, J.; Sharma, S.S.; Patra, A.; Dogra, P.; Yadav, G.K.; Dadhich, S.K.; Verma, R.; Kumawat, G.L. Microbial diversity and adaptation under salt-affected soils: A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, G.; Bai, J.; Zhai, Y.; Jia, J.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, W.; Hu, X. Microbial diversity and functions in saline soils: A review from a biogeochemical perspective. J. Adv. Res. 2024, 59, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Durasov, A.M.; Tazabekov, T.T. Pochvy Kazakhstana [Soils of Kazakhstan]; Kainar: Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Oliverio, A.M.; Brewer, T.E.; Benavent-González, A.; Eldridge, D.J.; Bardgett, R.D.; Maestre, F.T.; Singh, B.K.; Fierer, N. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 2018, 359, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fierer, N.; Jackson, R.B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lauber, C.L.; Hamady, M.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5111–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bahram, M.; Hildebrand, F.; Forslund, S.K.; Anderson, J.L.; Soudzilovskaia, N.A.; Bodegom, P.M.; Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Anslan, S.; Coelho, L.P.; Harend, H. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 2018, 560, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Thompson, L.R.; Sanders, J.G.; McDonald, D.; Amir, A.; Ladau, J.; Locey, K.J.; Prill, R.J.; Tripathi, A.; Gibbons, S.M.; Ackermann, G. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 2017, 551, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bardgett, R.D.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 2014, 515, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- ISO. Soil Quality: Determination of Organic and Total Carbon After Dry Combustion (Elementary Analysis); ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, D.W.; Sommers, L.E. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1982; Volume 9, pp. 539–579. [Google Scholar]
- Richards, L.A. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Olsen, S.R. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Olsen, S.R.; Sommers, L.E. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ed.; Page, A.L., Ed.; Agronomy Monographs; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- ISO/TS 22171:2023; Soil Quality—Determination of Exchangeable Cations in Soil and Related Materials Using Extractants. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
- ISO 10390:2021; Soil, Treated Biowaste and Sludge—Determination of pH. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
- Baird, R.; Eaton, A.D.; Rice, E.W.; Bridgewater, L.; Association, A.P.H.; Association, A.W.W.; Federation, W.E. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Biver, S.; Vandenbol, M. Characterization of three new carboxylic ester hydrolases isolated by functional screening of a forest soil metagenomic library. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Amplicon, P.; Clean-Up, P.; Index, P. 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation; Illumina: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Klindworth, A.; Pruesse, E.; Schweer, T.; Peplies, J.; Quast, C.; Horn, M.; Glöckner, F.O. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Usyk, M.; Zolnik, C.P.; Patel, H.; Levi, M.H.; Burk, R.D. Novel ITS1 fungal primers for characterization of the mycobiome. MSphere 2017, 2, e00488-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Joshi, N.; Fass, J. Sickle: A Sliding-Window, Adaptive, Quality-Based Trimming Tool for FastQ Files, Version 1.33; GitHub: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2011; Available online: https://github.com/najoshi/sickle (accessed on 26 May 2026).
- Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abarenkov, K.; Nilsson, R.H.; Larsson, K.-H.; Taylor, A.F.; May, T.W.; Frøslev, T.G.; Pawlowska, J.; Lindahl, B.; Põldmaa, K.; Truong, C. The UNITE database for molecular identification and taxonomic communication of fungi and other eukaryotes: Sequences, taxa and classifications reconsidered. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D791–D797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abarenkov, K.; Zirk, A.; Piirmann, T.; Pöhönen, R.; Ivanov, F.; Nilsson, R.H.; Kõljalg, U. UNITE QIIME Release for Fungi; UNITE Community: Tartu, Estonia, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rognes, T.; Flouri, T.; Nichols, B.; Quince, C.; Mahé, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 2016, 4, e2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wickham, H.; Averick, M.; Bryan, J.; Chang, W.; McGowan, L.D.A.; François, R.; Grolemund, G.; Hayes, A.; Henry, L.; Hester, J. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 2019, 4, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oksanen, J.; Simpson, G.L.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Szoecs, E.; et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package; R Package Version 2.6-4. 2022. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 26 May 2026).
- Wickham, H. Data analysis. In ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 189–201. [Google Scholar]
- Chao, A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 1984, 11, 265–270. [Google Scholar]
- Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Good, I.J. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 1953, 40, 237–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Whittaker, R.H. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 1972, 21, 213–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Clarke, K.R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 1993, 18, 117–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ramette, A. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 62, 142–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps; R Package Version 1.0.12. 2019. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap (accessed on 26 May 2026).
- Paliy, O.; Shankar, V. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 1032–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- FAO; ITPS. Global assessment of salt-affected soils. In Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Rath, K.M.; Fierer, N.; Murphy, D.V.; Rousk, J. Linking bacterial community composition to soil salinity along environmental gradients. ISME J. 2019, 13, 836–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kaminsky, L.M.; Trexler, R.V.; Malik, R.J.; Hockett, K.L.; Bell, T.H. The inherent conflicts in developing soil microbial inoculants. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- O’Callaghan, M.; Ballard, R.A.; Wright, D. Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities. Soil Use Manag. 2022, 38, 1340–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Parnell, J.J.; Berka, R.; Young, H.A.; Sturino, J.M.; Kang, Y.; Barnhart, D.M.; DiLeo, M.V. From the lab to the farm: An industrial perspective of plant beneficial microorganisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, U.B.; Malviya, D.; Singh, S.; Singh, P.; Ghatak, A.; Imran, M.; Rai, J.P.; Singh, R.K.; Manna, M.C.; Sharma, A.K. Salt-tolerant compatible microbial inoculants modulate physio-biochemical responses enhance plant growth, Zn biofortification and yield of wheat grown in saline-sodic soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, Q.; Hu, H.; He, Z.; Cui, L.; Zhu, Y.; He, J. Potential of indigenous crop microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Del-Canto, A.; Sanz-Saez, Á.; Sillero-Martínez, A.; Mintegi, E.; Lacuesta, M. Selected indigenous drought tolerant rhizobium strains as promising biostimulants for common bean in Northern Spain. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1046397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dwivedi, S.L.; Vetukuri, R.R.; Kelbessa, B.G.; Gepts, P.; Heslop-Harrison, P.; Araujo, A.S.; Sharma, S.; Ortiz, R. Exploitation of rhizosphere microbiome biodiversity in plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2025, 30, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Feng, G.; Wu, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Dong, M.; Wang, Y.; Qi, H.; Guo, L. Effects of coastal saline-alkali soil on rhizosphere microbial community and crop yield of cotton at different growth stages. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1359698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, X.; Wang, A.; Wan, W.; Luo, X.; Zheng, L.; He, G.; Huang, D.; Chen, W.; Huang, Q. High salinity inhibits soil bacterial community mediating nitrogen cycling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e01366-01321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, X.; Qi, L.; Li, W.; Hu, B.X.; Dai, Z. Bacterial community variations with salinity in the saltwater-intruded estuarine aquifer. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Marinari, S.; Carbone, S.; Antisari, L.V.; Grego, S.; Vianello, G. Microbial activity and functional diversity in Psamment soils in a forested coastal dune-swale system. Geoderma 2012, 173, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kamble, P.N.; Gaikwad, V.B.; Kuchekar, S.R.; Bååth, E. Microbial growth, biomass, community structure and nutrient limitation in high pH and salinity soils from Pravaranagar (India). Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2014, 65, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rousk, J.; Elyaagubi, F.K.; Jones, D.L.; Godbold, D.L. Bacterial salt tolerance is unrelated to soil salinity across an arid agroecosystem salinity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1881–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, Q.; Bai, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, G.; Cui, B. Shifts in the soil bacterial community along a salinity gradient in the Yellow River Delta. Land Degrad. Dev. 2020, 31, 2255–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guellout, M.; Guellout, Z.; Belhadj, H.; Guellout, A.; Bravo, A.G.; Jaouani, A. Metagenomic Profiling Reveals the Role of Soil Chemistry–Climate Interactions in Shaping the Bacterial Communities and Functional Repertories of Algerian Drylands. Eng 2026, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gunde-Cimerman, N.; Plemenitaš, A.; Oren, A. Strategies of adaptation of microorganisms of the three domains of life to high salt concentrations. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 353–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oren, A. Microbial life at high salt concentrations: Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Saline Syst. 2008, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Weinisch, L.; Kühner, S.; Roth, R.; Grimm, M.; Roth, T.; Netz, D.J.; Pierik, A.J.; Filker, S. Identification of osmoadaptive strategies in the halophile, heterotrophic ciliate Schmidingerothrix salinarum. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2003892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Canfora, L.; Bacci, G.; Pinzari, F.; Lo Papa, G.; Dazzi, C.; Benedetti, A. Salinity and bacterial diversity: To what extent does the concentration of salt affect the bacterial community in a saline soil? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, J.; Yan, Y.; Jiang, D.; Huangfu, S.; Ma, H.; Tian, L.; Huang, L. The Microbial Functional Communities of Mollisol and Saline–Sodic Paddy Soils at Rice Heading and Harvest Stages in Northeast China. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Feng, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Shang, S.; Xu, J.; Liu, T.; Liu, L. Effects of salt stress on the rhizosphere soil microbial communities of Suaeda salsa (L.) Pall. in the Yellow River Delta. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e70315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, C.; Li, K.; Lv, D.; Jiang, S.; Sun, J.; Lin, H.; Sun, J. Inconsistent response of bacterial phyla diversity and abundance to soil salinity in a Chinese delta. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.-Y.; Gao, J.-L.; Yu, X.-F.; Borjigin, Q.-G.; Qu, J.; Zhang, B.-Z.; Zhang, S.-N.; Li, Q.; Guo, J.-A.; Li, D.-B. Evaluation of the microbial community in various saline alkaline-soils driven by soil factors of the Hetao Plain, Inner Mongolia. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cai, S.; Xu, S.; Zhang, D.; Liang, Y.; Zhu, H. Vegetation-Driven Changes in Soil Salinity Ions and Microbial Communities Across Tidal Flat Reclamation. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cui, Y.; Ning, Z.; Li, M.; Qin, X.; Yue, X.; Chen, X.; Zhu, C.; Sun, H.; Huang, Y. Microbial network-driven remediation of saline-alkali soils by salt-tolerant plants. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1565399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, D.; Gao, P.; Niu, J.; Qu, Z.; Guo, S.; Ding, C.; Lou, Y.; Yang, Q.; Wang, H.; Yang, Z. Assessment of microbial diversity in various saline soils driven by salt content. Pedobiologia 2024, 107, 150997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bai, S.; Shang, K.; Zeng, S.; Huang, Z.; Han, Z. Genome analysis of Salinimicrobium sp. 3283s, a deep-sea bacterium isolated from the sediments of South China Sea, China. Mar. Genom. 2024, 76, 101125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, S.; Hou, H.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Z.; Wang, H.; Yuan, Y.; Feng, B. Relationship between nutrient accumulation in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and microbial community under different salinity soils. Plant Soil 2025, 511, 1285–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hui, R.; Tan, H. Divergence of nutrients, salt accumulation, bacterial community structure and diversity in soil after 8 years of flood irrigation with surface water and groundwater. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nazarov, A.; Nechaeva, Y.I.; Korsakova, E.; Pyankova, A.; Plotnikova, E. Soil bacterial communities in the affected zone of salt dump (Solikamsk, Perm krai). Eurasian Soil Sci. 2024, 57, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ayayee, P.A.; Custer, G.F.; Tronstad, L.M.; van Diepen, L.T. Unveiling salinity-driven shifts in microbial community composition across compartments of naturally saline inland streams. Hydrobiologia 2024, 851, 2627–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Murphy, C.L.; Biggerstaff, J.; Eichhorn, A.; Ewing, E.; Shahan, R.; Soriano, D.; Stewart, S.; VanMol, K.; Walker, R.; Walters, P. Genomic characterization of three novel Desulfobacterota classes expand the metabolic and phylogenetic diversity of the phylum. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 4326–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, J.; Chen, L.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, B. Salinity-driven differentiation of bacterial and fungal communities in coastal wetlands: Contrasting assembly processes and spatial dynamics. Environ. Res. 2025, 279, 121895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Duran, R.; Cary, J.W.; Calvo, A.M. Role of the osmotic stress regulatory pathway in morphogenesis and secondary metabolism in filamentous fungi. Toxins 2010, 2, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shree, A.; Pal, S.; Verma, P.K. Structural diversification of fungal cell wall in response to the stress signaling and remodeling during fungal pathogenesis. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2024, 30, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Treseder, K.K.; Lennon, J.T. Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2015, 79, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Egidi, E.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Plett, J.M.; Wang, J.; Eldridge, D.J.; Bardgett, R.D.; Maestre, F.T.; Singh, B.K. A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, S.; Cao, Z.; Liu, S.; Hao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Sun, G.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, B. Soil fungal diversity, community structure, and network stability in the southwestern Tibetan Plateau. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Maestre, F.T.; Eldridge, D.J.; Soliveres, S.; Kéfi, S.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Bowker, M.A.; García-Palacios, P.; Gaitán, J.; Gallardo, A.; Lázaro, R. Structure and functioning of dryland ecosystems in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2016, 47, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]












| Samples | Humus, % | pH | Calcium in Water Extract, mg/L | Magnesium in Water Extract, mg/L | Chlorides, mg/L | Sulfates, mg/L | Total Mineralization/Solid/Dry Residue, mg/L | Sodium in Water Extract, mg/L | Bicarbonates, mg/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MetaG-1-PAV | 1.09 | 10.06 | 17.17 | 3.035 | 589.2 | 742.8 | 3365 | 873 | 48.8 |
| MetaG-2-PAV | 1.17 | 10.17 | 13.07 | 4.053 | 585 | 355.3 | 2325 | 653.7 | 73.2 |
| MetaG-3-PAV | 1.29 | 10.47 | 38.57 | 5.143 | 704.4 | 362.5 | 4990 | 797.8 | 170.8 |
| MetaG-4-PAV | 2.92 | 7.91 | 140.2 | 11.82 | 141.9 | 2282 | 3940 | 1054 | 18.3 |
| MetaG-8-AQM1 | 0.69 | 9.7 | 16.32 | 6.856 | 578.5 | 722.8 | 2188 | 771.5 | 1200 |
| MetaG-9-AQM1 | 0.65 | 8.82 | 98.29 | 40.67 | 467.8 | 1003 | 2116 | 613.5 | 1000 |
| MetaG-10-AQM1 | 0.57 | 8.8 | 375.6 | 39.43 | 147.3 | 2952 | 2276 | 527.4 | 900 |
| MetaG-11-AQM1 | 0.55 | 8.56 | 338.6 | 15.24 | 6.244 | 966.5 | 1080 | 33.78 | 700 |
| MetaG-12-ATY | 0.22 | 8.84 | 42.44 | 33.41 | 412.5 | 172.3 | 928 | 243.1 | 600 |
| MetaG-13-AQM2 | 3.14 | 8.71 | 436.4 | 228.3 | 3069 | 5913 | 11,884 | 3999 | 48.8 |
| MetaG-14-AQM2 | 0.90 | 8.99 | 426.9 | 22.85 | not detected | 4452 | 5184 | 14.29 | not detected |
| MetaG-15-AQM2 | 0.92 | 8.77 | 30.35 | 2.931 | 2.488 | 62.06 | 256 | 9.257 | not detected |
| MetaG-16-AQM2 | 0.18 | 8.5 | 22.63 | 3.512 | 4.433 | 55.62 | 316 | 10.47 | 48.8 |
| MetaG-17-AQM2 | 1.35 | 8.66 | 419 | 66.52 | 1876 | 6098 | 14,184 | 4431 | 48.8 |
| MetaG-18-AQM3 | 1.19 | 8.95 | 1024 | 435.4 | 3387 | 761.1 | 13,104 | 2898 | 48.8 |
| MetaG-19-AQM3 | 1.86 | 8.15 | 759.5 | 1323 | 7462 | 1202 | 26,312 | 4321 | 428 |
| MetaG-20-AQM3 | 2.49 | 8.37 | 357.8 | 623.7 | 4155 | 1564 | 11,252 | 3839 | 68 |
| MetaG-28-KAR | 2.06 | 8.9 | 4.06 | 3.535 | 189.9 | 266.1 | 932 | 328.9 | 48.8 |
| MetaG-29-KAR | 2.39 | 8.64 | 12.99 | 4.796 | 62.72 | 94.37 | 448 | 118.5 | 428 |
| MetaG-30-KAR | 1.03 | 8.8 | 65.45 | 9.624 | 7097 | not detected | 4924 | 1943 | 68 |
| Phylum | Min–Max (%) | Total Mean (%) | NS Mean (%) | MS Mean (%) | HS Mean (%) | Kruskal–Wallis p | FDR q | Occurrence (n of 20 Samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinomycetota | 6.02–44.31 | 26.63 | 25.56 | 30.77 | 25.98 | 7.296 × 10−1 | 8.408 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Bacteroidota | 5.34–47.00 | 21.47 | 8.15 | 10.12 | 26.76 | 3.287 × 10−3 | 3.616 × 10−2 | 20/20 |
| Pseudomonadota | 6.11–51.77 | 19.71 | 28.16 | 16.28 | 18.64 | 7.644E × 10−1 | 8.408 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| “Candidatus Patescibacteria” | 0.00–25.31 | 5.53 | 1.79 | 4.87 | 6.47 | 3.602 × 10−1 | 6.544 × 10−1 | 19/20 |
| Bacillota | 0.00–24.76 | 5.12 | 3.35 | 2.42 | 6.08 | 4.759 × 10−1 | 6.544 × 10−1 | 19/20 |
| Acidobacteriota | 0.41–17.83 | 4.98 | 12.28 | 9.02 | 2.55 | 9.410 × 10−3 | 5.175 × 10−2 | 20/20 |
| Gemmatimonadota | 0.06–11.51 | 4.54 | 5.43 | 5.78 | 4.09 | 4.569 × 10−1 | 6.544 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Chloroflexota | 0.08–11.38 | 3.96 | 5.53 | 9.17 | 2.51 | 3.232 × 10−2 | 1.185 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Verrucomicrobiota | 0.00–11.49 | 2.17 | 3.05 | 3.47 | 1.71 | 2.210 × 10−1 | 4.862 × 10−1 | 19/20 |
| Planctomycetota | 0.07–3.53 | 1.22 | 1.1 | 1.09 | 1.28 | 9.422 × 10−1 | 9.422 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Nitrospirota | 0.00–3.54 | 1.06 | 0.61 | 1.68 | 1.03 | 2.138 × 10−1 | 4.862 × 10−1 | 17/20 |
| Class | Min–Max (%) | Total Mean (%) | NS Mean (%) | MS Mean (%) | HS Mean (%) | Kruskal–Wallis p | FDR q | Occurrence (n of 20 Samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidia | 3.62–39.55 | 17.22 | 7.8 | 8.01 | 21.21 | 7.205 × 10−3 | 9.727 × 10−2 | 20/20 |
| Acidimicrobiia | 0.68–39.62 | 16.72 | 10.34 | 18.01 | 17.81 | 4.155 × 10−1 | 7.012 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 1.37–46.99 | 12.93 | 17.23 | 10.47 | 12.53 | 8.779 × 10−1 | 9.166 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.76–15.42 | 7.46 | 9.28 | 8.13 | 6.93 | 7.769E × 10−1 | 9.121 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Alphaproteobacteria | 0.14–24.27 | 6.79 | 10.93 | 5.81 | 6.11 | 8.826 × 10−1 | 9.166 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| Bacilli | 0.00–24.76 | 4.8 | 3.07 | 2.32 | 5.71 | 5.690 × 10−1 | 7.361 × 10−1 | 19/20 |
| Rhodothermia | 0.00–12.78 | 3.92 | 0.04 | 1.15 | 5.34 | 1.135 × 10−2 | 1.021 × 10−1 | 18/20 |
| Saccharimonadia | 0.00–16.34 | 3.9 | 1.72 | 2.81 | 4.6 | 5.691 × 10−1 | 7.361 × 10−1 | 18/20 |
| Blastocatellia | 0.00–9.35 | 2.17 | 6.01 | 4.44 | 0.86 | 1.021 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 15/20 |
| Verrucomicrobiae | 0.00–11.31 | 2.06 | 3.05 | 3.4 | 1.55 | 1.182 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 19/20 |
| Gemmatimonadetes | 0.00–7.33 | 1.58 | 4 | 2 | 0.98 | 2.789 × 10−1 | 6.275 × 10−1 | 17/20 |
| Anaerolineae | 0.00–10.38 | 1.29 | 0.19 | 4.32 | 0.88 | 3.731 × 10−1 | 7.012 × 10−1 | 17/20 |
| p__Actinomycetota; c__MB-A2-108 | 0.00–10.42 | 1.19 | 2.43 | 3.58 | 0.42 | 4.965 × 10−1 | 7.361 × 10−1 | 9/20 |
| Thermoleophilia | 0.00–6.70 | 1.16 | 3.23 | 1.04 | 0.74 | 2.321 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 16/20 |
| Vicinamibacteria | 0.00–7.17 | 1.14 | 4.84 | 1.94 | 0.17 | 3.887 × 10−3 | 9.727 × 10−2 | 12/20 |
| Nitrospiria | 0.00–3.54 | 1.06 | 0.61 | 1.68 | 1.03 | 2.138 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 17/20 |
| Planctomycetes | 0.07–3.46 | 1.03 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 1.1 | 8.135 × 10−1 | 9.151 × 10−1 | 20/20 |
| p__Chloroflexota; c__Gitt-GS-136 | 0.00–4.17 | 0.87 | 1.91 | 1.49 | 0.51 | 4.119 × 10−1 | 7.012 × 10−1 | 16/20 |
| p__Gemmatimonadota; c__S0134_terrestrial_group | 0.00–3.58 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.73 | 0.66 | 2.279 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 15/20 |
| Dehalococcoidia | 0.00–3.05 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 1.41 | 0.59 | 5.725 × 10−1 | 7.361 × 10−1 | 15/20 |
| Parcubacteria | 0.00–3.30 | 0.7 | 0.07 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 3.475 × 10−1 | 7.012 × 10−1 | 16/20 |
| Cyanobacteriia | 0.00–7.14 | 0.69 | 2.38 | 1.87 | 0.08 | 9.248 × 10−1 | 9.248 × 10−1 | 7/20 |
| p__Gemmatimonadota; c__PAUC43f_marine_benthic_group | 0.00–4.11 | 0.69 | 0 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 1.866 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 11/20 |
| p__Gemmatimonadota; c__BD2-11_terrestrial_group | 0.00–4.21 | 0.65 | 0 | 0.48 | 0.82 | 1.847 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 11/20 |
| Acidobacteriae | 0.00–1.94 | 0.61 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.283 × 10−1 | 5.697 × 10−1 | 16/20 |
| Desulfuromonadia | 0.00–2.53 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 6.067 × 10−1 | 7.446 × 10−1 | 15/20 |
| Chloroflexia | 0.00–3.14 | 0.58 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 0.34 | 5.481 × 10−1 | 7.361 × 10−1 | 12/20 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Nauanova, A.; Onggarbay, A.; Ordabayeva, A.; Abdigulov, B.; Kassipkhan, A.; Maxutbekova, G.; Nazarova, A.; Shevtsov, A. Bacterial and Fungal Community Responses to Long-Term Salinity Gradients in Natural Soils of Kazakhstan. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061337
Nauanova A, Onggarbay A, Ordabayeva A, Abdigulov B, Kassipkhan A, Maxutbekova G, Nazarova A, Shevtsov A. Bacterial and Fungal Community Responses to Long-Term Salinity Gradients in Natural Soils of Kazakhstan. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(6):1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061337
Chicago/Turabian StyleNauanova, Ainash, Aisulu Onggarbay, Anel Ordabayeva, Bolat Abdigulov, Akgul Kassipkhan, Gulzhanat Maxutbekova, Aiman Nazarova, and Alexandr Shevtsov. 2026. "Bacterial and Fungal Community Responses to Long-Term Salinity Gradients in Natural Soils of Kazakhstan" Microorganisms 14, no. 6: 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061337
APA StyleNauanova, A., Onggarbay, A., Ordabayeva, A., Abdigulov, B., Kassipkhan, A., Maxutbekova, G., Nazarova, A., & Shevtsov, A. (2026). Bacterial and Fungal Community Responses to Long-Term Salinity Gradients in Natural Soils of Kazakhstan. Microorganisms, 14(6), 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14061337

