Green-Synthesized vs. Chemical Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Study on S. aureus Adaptability and Cross-Activity
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Parameters
2.2. Nanoparticle Synthesis Routes and Electron Microscopy Techniques (SEM/TEM)
2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): Green and Chemical Route AgNPs Compared
2.4. Experimental Evolution
2.5. Specimen Preparation Procedures for Scanning Electron Microscopy
2.6. Structural and Morphological Analysis of Silver Nanoparticles
2.7. Time-Course Analysis of Phenotypic Growth over 24 h
2.8. Genomic Analysis
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of Green-Synthesized and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles
3.2. Induced S. aureus Resistance to Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles
3.3. Cross-Resistance: Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Induce Resistance to Ionic Silver
3.4. Cross-Resistance in Chemically Synthesized and Green-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles
3.5. Induced S. aureus Resistance to Mushroom-Derived Green-Synthesized Nanoparticles
3.6. Cross-Resistance: Reishi Mushroom-Mediated Green-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Induce Resistance to Ionic Silver
3.7. Cross-Resistance Between Chemically and Green-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles
3.8. Morphological Adaptation and Response of S. aureus to Green and Chemically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles
3.9. Genomic Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Casals, E.; Gusta, M.F.; Bastus, N.; Rello, J.; Puntes, V. Silver nanoparticles and antibiotics: A promising synergistic approach to multidrug-resistant infections. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, A.S.; Batista, J.G.; Rodrigues, M.Á.; Thipe, V.C.; Minarini, L.A.; Lopes, P.S.; Lugão, A.B. Advances in silver nanoparticles: A comprehensive review on their potential as antimicrobial agents and their mechanisms of action elucidated by proteomics. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1440065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Sharma, E. Endophytic nanotechnology as a dual-action approach against agricultural and clinical fungal pathogens. Arch. Microbiol. 2026, 208, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ewunkem, A.J.; Johnson, N.; A’lyiha, F.B.; Williams, Z.J.; Tshimanga, I.; Justice, B.; Singh, D.K.; Meixner, J. Green Synthesis–Mediated Nanoparticles: Characterization, Antimicrobial Activity and Genomics Analysis. In Recent Progress and Development in Nanostructures; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Zafar, M.S.; Ejaz, S.; Ahmad, F.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Al-Rawi, S.S.; Manzoor, F.; Aziz, S.; Iqbal, S.; Iqbal, M.A. Silver nanoparticles in water disinfection: A comprehensive overview on their mechanisms, benefits, and limitations. Arch. Microbiol. 2026, 208, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathy, S.; Rodrigues, J.; Shimpi, N.G. Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches for Synthesis of Nanoparticles. Nanobiomater. Perspect. Med. Appl. Diagn. Treat. Dis. 2023, 145, 92–130. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.F.; Liu, Z.G.; Shen, W.; Gurunathan, S. Silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, properties, applications, and therapeutic approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shanmuganathan, R.; Karuppusamy, I.; Saravanan, M.; Muthukumar, H.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Ramkumar, V.S.; Pugazhendhi, A. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their biomedical applications-a comprehensive review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 2650–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borehalli Mayegowda, S.; Roy, A.; Manjula, N.G.; Pandit, S.; Alghamdi, S.; Almehmadi, M.; Allahyani, M.; Awwad, N.S.; Sharma, R. Eco-friendly synthesized nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: An updated review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1224778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, A.; Mondal, N.K. Green synthesis of nanoparticles and their applications in various fields: Analyzing the current status in 2025. In Data-Driven Environmental Intelligence; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2026; pp. 146–166. [Google Scholar]
- Rai, M.; Kon, K.; Ingle, A.; Duran, N.; Galdiero, S.; Galdiero, M. Broad-spectrum bioactivities of silver nanoparticles: The emerging trends and future prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frippiat, T.; Art, T.; Delguste, C. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine: Current applications and future perspectives. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padhye, L.P.; Jasemizad, T.; Bolan, S.; Tsyusko, O.V.; Unrine, J.M.; Biswal, B.K.; Balasubramanian, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, J.; et al. Silver contamination and its toxicity and risk management in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 871, 161926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ihtisham, M.; Noori, A.; Yadav, S.; Sarraf, M.; Kumari, P.; Brestic, M.; Imran, M.; Jiang, F.; Yan, X.; Rastogi, A. Silver Nanoparticle’s Toxicological Effects and Phytoremediation. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamat, S.; Kumari, M. Emergence of microbial resistance against nanoparticles: Mechanisms and strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1102615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, R.; Cui, Y.; Wu, Y.; Gao, M.; Xue, S.; Li, R.; Zbořil, R.; Zhang, C. Overcoming nanosilver resistance: Resensitizing bacteria and targeting evolutionary mechanisms. ACS Nano 2024, 19, 1702–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graves, J.L., Jr.; Tajkarimi, M.; Cunningham, Q.; Campbell, A.; Nonga, H.; Harrison, S.H.; Barrick, J.E. Rapid evolution of silver nanoparticle resistance in Escherichia coli. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewunkem, A.J.; Priester, T.N.; Williams, D.; Ariyon, B.; Tshimanga, I.; Justice, B.; Singh, D.K. Rapid green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Reishi and their antibacterial activity and mechanisms. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 15, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menichetti, A.; Mavridi-Printezi, A.; Mordini, D.; Montalti, M. Effect of size, shape and surface functionalization on the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kirubakaran, D.; Wahid, J.B.; Karmegam, N.; Jeevika, R.; Sellapillai, L.; Rajkumar, M.; SenthilKumar, K.J. A comprehensive review on the green synthesis of nanoparticles: Advancements in biomedical and environmental applications. Biomed. Mater. Devices 2026, 4, 388–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perveen, F.; Ullah, F.; Rehman, A.; Zaman, H.; Abbas, W.; Khan, M.; Bilal, M.; Khan, A. A review on nanotechnology-driven green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Nigella sativa. Insights-J. Health Rehabil. 2025, 3, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammami, I.; Alabdallah, N.M. Gold nanoparticles: Synthesis properties and applications. J. King Saud. Univ.-Sci. 2021, 33, 101560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velgosova, O.; Mačák, L.; Lisnichuk, M.; Vojtko, M. Synthesis and analysis of polymorphic silver nanoparticles and their incorporation into the polymer matrix. Polymers 2022, 14, 2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chicea, D.; Nicolae-Maranciuc, A.; Doroshkevich, A.S.; Chicea, L.M.; Ozkendir, O.M. Comparative synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Evaluation of chemical reduction procedures, AFM and DLS size analysis. Materials 2023, 16, 5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farooqi, M.A.; Bae, S.; Kim, S.; Bae, S.; Kausar, F.; Farooqi, H.M.; Hyun, C.G.; Kang, C.U. Eco-friendly synthesis of bioactive silver nanoparticles from black roasted gram (Cicer arietinum) for biomedical applications. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewunkem, A.; Merrills, L.; Williams, Z.; Justice, B.; Iloghalu, U.; Williams, V.; Singh, D. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy assessment of ethanolic, aqueous, and dual solvent extracts of mushroom Ganoderma lucidum: Genomic and morphological analysis. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmani-Zarchi, H.; Mousavi-Sagharchi, S.M.; Sepahdoost, N.; Ranjbar-Jamalabadi, M.; Gross, J.D.; Jooya, H.; Samadi, A. Antimicrobial feature of nanoparticles in the antibiotic resistance era: From mechanism to application. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2024, 13, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Draviana, H.T.; Fitriannisa, I.; Khafid, M.; Krisnawati, D.I.; Widodo Lai, C.H.; Fan, Y.J.; Kuo, T.R. Size and charge effects of metal nanoclusters on antibacterial mechanisms. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, S.; Tak, Y.K.; Song, J.M. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1712–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, C.; Li, Y.; Tjong, S.C. Bactericidal and cytotoxic properties of silver nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slomberg, D.L.; Lu, Y.; Broadnax, A.D.; Hunter, R.A.; Carpenter, A.W.; Schoenfisch, M.H. Role of size and shape on biofilm eradication for nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 9322–9329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewunkem, A.J.; Daodu, B.; Williams, Z.J.; Merrills, L.; Justice, B.L.; Simpson, F.; Holland, D.; Bowers, T.; Iloghalu, U. Antibacterial activity of green-synthesized silver nanoparticles against Gram-negative bacteria and insights into potential resistance mechanisms. INNOSC Theranostics Pharmacol. Sci. 2025, 8, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasić, M.S.; Zvezdanović, J.B.; Stanojević, L.P.; Stanojević, J.S.; Petrović, S.M.; BojanaDanilović Cvetković, D.J. Characterization and Biological Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Stabilized by Aqueous Extracts of Rubus spp. Leaves. Colloid J. 2026, 88, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- More, P.R.; Pandit, S.; Filippis, A.D.; Franci, G.; Mijakovic, I.; Galdiero, M. Silver nanoparticles: Bactericidal and mechanistic approach against drug resistant pathogens. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suchánková, L.; Kvítek, L.; Kolář, M.; Panáček, A. Emerging strategies of bacterial adaptation mechanisms to silver and metal oxide nanomaterials. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2026, 50, fuaf060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosnedlova, B.; Kabanov, D.; Kepinska, M.; BNarayanan, V.H.; Parikesit, A.A.; Fernandez, C.; Bjørklund, G.; Nguyen, H.V.; Farid, A.; Sochor, J.; et al. Effect of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles on bacterial biofilm changes in S. aureus and E. coli. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hochvaldová, L.; Panáček, D.; Válková, L.; Večeřová, R.; Kolář, M.; Prucek, R.; Kvítek, L.; Panáček, A. E. coli and S. aureus resist silver nanoparticles via an identical mechanism, but through different pathways. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elghazaly, E.M.; Torky, H.A.; Tawfik, R.G. Effect of silver nanoparticles and REP-PCR typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from various sources. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 21997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Derbise, A.; Dyke, K.G.; El Solh, N. Characterization of a Staphylococcus aureus Transposon, Tn5405, Located within Tn5404and Carrying the Aminoglycoside Resistance Genes, aphA-3andaadE. Plasmid 1996, 35, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Snider, J.; Thibault, G.; Houry, W.A. The AAA+ superfamily of functionally diverse proteins. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.L.; Chen, Y.; Fang, Z.P.; Ruan, Z.R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, R.J.; Xue, M.Q.; Wang, E.D. Translational quality control by bacterial threonyl-tRNA synthetases. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 21208–21221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasreen, M.; Nair, R.P.; McEwan, A.G.; Kappler, U. The peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrAB) of Haemophilus influenzae repairs oxidatively damaged outer membrane and periplasmic proteins involved in nutrient acquisition and virulence. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Santos Ferreira, M.C.; Pendleton, A.; Yeo, W.S.; Málaga Gadea, F.C.; Camelo, D.; McGuire, M.; Brinsmade, S.R. In Staphylococcus aureus, the acyl-CoA synthetase MbcS supports branched-chain fatty acid synthesis from carboxylic acid and aldehyde precursors. Mol. Microbiol. 2024, 121, 865–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vincent, A.T. Bacterial hypothetical proteins may be of functional interest. Front. Bacteriol. 2024, 3, 1334712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, G. The α/β Hydrolase Fold Proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, with Reference to their Contribution to Virulence. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 190–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, R.M.; Carter, M.M.; Chu, M.L.; Latario, C.J.; Stadler, S.K.; Stauff, D.L. Heme sensing in Bacillus thuringiensis: A supplementary HssRS-regulated heme resistance system. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karpowich, N.K.; Song, J.; Wang, D.N. An aromatic cap seals the substrate binding site in an ECF-type S subunit for riboflavin. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3118–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, A.; Modak, R. Protein acetyltransferases mediate bacterial adaptation to a diverse environment. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e0023121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurunathan, S.; Han, J.W.; Kwon, D.N.; Kim, J.H. Enhanced antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of silver nanoparticles against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanta, Y.K.; Nayak, D.; Biswas, K.; Singdevsachan, S.K.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Yadav, D.; Mohanta, T.K. Silver nanoparticles synthesized using wild mushroom show potential antimicrobial activities against food borne pathogens. Molecules 2018, 23, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ewunkem, A.J.; Tshimanga, I.; Justice, B.; Meixner, J. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from honeybees and its antibacterial potential. Open J. Med. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathy, M.M.; Elfiky, A.A.; Bashandy, Y.S.; Hamdy, M.M.; Elgharib, A.M.; Ibrahim, I.M.; Kamal, R.T.; Mohamed, A.S.; Rashad, A.M.; Ahmed, O.S.; et al. An insight into synthesis and antitumor activity of citrate and gallate stabilizing gold nanospheres. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, A.S.; Gebremariam, T.; Lin, L.; Luo, G.; Husseiny, M.I.; Skory, C.D.; Fu, Y.; French, S.W.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Spellberg, B. The high affinity iron permease is a key virulence factor required for Rhizopus oryzae pathogenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 587–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.H.; Zheng, D.H.; Yuan, G.Q.; Lin, W.; Li, Q.Q. A yceI Gene Involves in the adaptation of Ralstonia solanacearum to methyl gallate and other stresses. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bommisetti, P.; Bandarian, V. Insights into the mechanism of installation of 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl uridine hypermodification by tRNA-modifying enzymes MnmE and MnmG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26947–26961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Huang, H.; Jin, X.; Levin, E.J.; Kloss, B.; Zhou, M. Gating of the TrkH ion channel by its associated RCK protein TrkA. Nature 2013, 496, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Km, C. icaR encodes a transcriptional repressor involved in environmental regulation of ica operon expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 4400–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoang, T.M.; Zhou, C.; Lindgren, J.K.; Galac, M.R.; Corey, B.; Endres, J.E.; Olson, M.E.; Fey, P.D. Transcriptional Regulation of icaADBC by both IcaR and TcaR in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, e00524-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Jin, J.; Song, K.; Qian, X.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, L.; et al. Regulatory functions of PurR in Yersinia pestis: Orchestrating diverse biological activities. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; Li, Y.; Zhu, F.; Cheung, A.L.; Wang, G.; Bai, G.; Proctor, R.A.; Yeaman, M.R.; Bayer, A.S.; Xiong, Y.Q. New mechanistic insights into purine biosynthesis with second messenger c-di-AMP in relation to biofilm-related persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. mBio 2021, 12, e02081-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedlakova-Kadukova, J.; Sincak, M.; Demčakova, V. Does the silver nanoparticles production route affect the proliferation of antibiotic resistance in soil ecosystem? Antibiotics 2024, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ewunkem, A.J.; Rodgers, L.; Campbell, D.; Staley, C.; Subedi, K.; Boyd, S.; Graves, J.L., Jr. Experimental Evolution of Magnetite Nanoparticle Resistance in Escherichia coli. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]








| Gene (16–20) | Position | Mutation | MNP1 | MNP2 | MNP3 | MNP4 | MNP5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KQ76_RS13020 | 2,574,726 | G69D (GGC→GAC) | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| hssR | 2,389,192 | R188Q (CGA→CAA) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13825 | 2,746,925 | A172V (GCT→GTT) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS02145/ KQ76_RS02150 | 460,550 | intergenic (+70/−69) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS01495 | 339,381 | I507L (ATT→CTT) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| graR | 673,306 | A185T (GCA→ACA) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS07415 | 1,542,551 | D12V (GAT→GTT) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13830/ KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,571 | intergenic (−255/−127) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS01815 | 391,366 | S34R (AGT→AGG) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| KQ76_RS07500 | 1,547,921 | S147N (AGT→AAT) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS10165 | 1,427,394 | I313L (ATT→CTT) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| mnhD1 | 874,149 | L76F (TTA→TTC) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS12955 | 2,564,194 | A17T (GCA→ACA) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| mbcS/ KQ76_RS13395 | 2,650,139 | intergenic (−101/+93) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| icaR | 2,728,076 | coding (96/561 nt) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| pepF | 940,766 | S509R (AGT→AGG) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| pgsA | 1,261,441 | I19L (ATA→CTA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| mnmG | 2,776,119 | L116L (TTG→TTA) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS00135 | 34,670 | K118K (AAG→AAA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS12180 | 2,408,435 | L213L (TTA→CTA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS10330 | 2,061,461 | Y3S (TAT→TCT) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13830/ KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,556 | intergenic (−240/−142) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ylqF | 1,213,003 | E184E (GAG→GAA) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KQ76_RS01495 | 339,390 | M510L (ATG→CTG) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| sem/KQ76_RS09345 | 1,907,997 | intergenic (−276/+6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| pflB | 200,288 | L193F (TTA→TTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| sbcD | 1,332,642 | N253H (AAC→CAC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| sem/KQ76_RS09345 | 1,908,002 | intergenic (−281/+1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS05490/ KQ76_RS05495 | 1,123,454 | intergenic (+43/−259) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| thrS | 1,740,866 | E148E (GAG→GAA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13700 | 2,723,593 | L100F (TTA→TTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| rsp | 2,414,415 | C697 (TGC→TGA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| mco | 26,020 | N341K (AAC→AAA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13475 | 2,665,475 | S163F (TCT→TTT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS11185 | 2,236,063 | R52H (CGT→CAT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gene | Gene Product |
|---|---|
| KQ76_RS13020 | alpha/beta hydrolase fold domain-containing protein |
| hssR | DNA-binding heme response regulator HssR |
| Q76_RS13825 | ECF-type riboflavin transporter substrate-binding protein |
| KQ76_RS02145/KQ76_RS02150 | hypothetical protein/GNAT family N-acetyltransferase |
| KQ76_RS01495 | FTR1 family iron permease |
| graR | response regulator transcription factor GraR/ApsR |
| KQ76_RS07415 | hypothetical protein |
| KQ76_RS13830/KQ76_RS13835 | S-adenosyl-l-methionine hydroxide adenosyltransferase family protein/YceI family protein |
| KQ76_RS01815 | general stress protein |
| KQ76_RS07500 | conserved phage C-terminal domain-containing protein |
| KQ76_RS10165 | TrkH family potassium uptake protein |
| KQ76_RS06970 | zinc-finger domain-containing protein |
| mnhD1 | Na+/H+ antiporter Mnh1 subunit D |
| KQ76_RS12955 | D-lactate dehydrogenase |
| mbcS/KQ76_RS13395 | acyl-CoA synthetase MbcS/antibiotic biosynthesis monooxygenase family protein |
| icaR | ica operon transcriptional regulator IcaR |
| KQ76_RS10330 | accessory gene regulator AgrB |
| pepF | oligoendopeptidase F |
| pgsA | CDP-diacylglycerol--glycerol-3-phosphate 3-phosphatidyltransferase |
| mnmG | tRNA uridine-5-carboxymethylaminomethyl(34) synthesis enzyme MnmG |
| KQ76_RS00135 | AAA family ATPase |
| KQ76_RS12180 | magnesium transporter CorA family protein |
| KQ76_RS01495 | FTR1 family iron permease |
| sem/KQ76_RS09345 | staphylococcal enterotoxin type M/exotoxin beta-grasp domain-containing protein |
| ylqF | ribosome biogenesis GTPase YlqF |
| pflB | formate C-acetyltransferase |
| sbcD | exonuclease subunit SbcD |
| KQ76_RS05490/KQ76_RS05495 | hypothetical protein/IS1182-like element ISSau3 family transposase |
| thrS | threonine--tRNA ligase |
| KQ76_RS13700 | peptide-methionine (S)-S-oxide reductase |
| rsp | AraC family transcriptional regulator Rsp |
| mco | multi-copper oxidase Mco |
| KQ76_RS01495 | FTR1 family iron permease |
| KQ76_RS13475 | glutathione peroxidase |
| mbcS/KQ76_RS13395 | acyl-CoA synthetase MbcS/antibiotic biosynthesis monooxygenase family protein |
| KQ76_RS11185 | NADP-dependent oxidoreductase |
| KQ76_RS10330 | accessory gene regulator AgrB |
| KQ76_RS13830/KQ76_RS13835 | S-adenosyl-l-methionine hydroxide adenosyltransferase family protein/YceI family protein |
| KQ76_RS02145/KQ76_RS02150 | hypothetical protein/GNAT family N-acetyltransferase |
| KQ76_RS12955 | D-lactate dehydrogenase |
| folP | dihydropteroate synthase |
| icaR/icaA | ica operon transcriptional regulator IcaR/poly-beta-1,6 N-acetyl-D-glucosamine synthase IcaA |
| KQ76_RS14600/KQ76_RS09310 | helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein/DUF6978 family protein |
| purS | phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase subunit PurS |
| KQ76_RS05075 | cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase subunit II |
| mutS | DNA mismatch repair protein MutS |
| KQ76_RS01915 | superantigen-like protein SSL10 |
| KQ76_RS07500 | conserved phage C-terminal domain-containing protein |
| fdhD | formate dehydrogenase accessory sulfurtransferase FdhD |
| Gene (21–25) Chemical | Position | Mutation | CN1 | CNP2 | CN3 | CN4 | CN5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| icaR | 2,728,076 | coding (96/561 nt) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13020 | 2,574,726 | G69D (GGC→GAC) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| hssR | 2,389,192 | R188Q (CGA→CAA) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| KQ76_RS01495 | 339,381 | I507L (ATT→CTT) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| KQ76_RS01815 | 255.1/38.8 | L40R (CTA→CGA) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| ylqF | 1,213,003 | E184E (GAG→GAA) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS10330 | 2,061,461 | Y3S (TAT→TCT) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13830 /KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,571 | intergenic (−255/−127) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| sbcD | 1,332,654 | I257L (ATT→CTT) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13830/ KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,573 | intergenic (−257/−125) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS02145 /KQ76_RS02150 | 460,550 | intergenic (+70/−69) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS12955 | 2,564,194 | A17T (GCA→ACA) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13830 /KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,556 | intergenic (−240/−142) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| mnmG | 2,776,119 | L116L (TTG→TTA) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| rsp | 2,413,415 | coding (1091/2106 nt) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS10165 | 2,037,141 | V315L (GTA→TTA) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13825 | 2,746,925 | A172V (GCT→GTT) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| folP | 504,457 | V222I (GTA→ATA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| mco | 26,020 | N341K (AAC→AAA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| pflB | 200,288 | L193F (TTA→TTC) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| icaR/icaA | 2,728,181 | intergenic (−10/−154) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| mnhD1 | 874,149 | L76F (TTA→TTC) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| pgsA | 1,261,441 | I19L (ATA→CTA) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| pepF | 940,717 | L493 (TTA→TGA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| graR | 673,306 | A185T (GCA→ACA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS14600 /KQ76_RS09310 | 1,901,738 | intergenic (+1/−100) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| purS | 1,027,271 | A87T (GCA→ACA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS14600 /KQ76_RS09310 | 1,901,745 | intergenic (+8/−93) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gene (26–30) | Position | Mutation | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KQ76_RS05075 | 1,048,213 | pseudogene (686/1021 nt) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| hssR | 2,389,192 | R188Q (CGA→CAA) | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| KQ76_RS01495 | 339,381 | I507L (ATT→CTT) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13020 | 2,574,726 | G69D (GGC→GAC) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13825 | 2,746,925 | A172V (GCT→GTT) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS01815 | 391,366 | S34R (AGT→AGG) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| KQ76_RS13830 /KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,556 | intergenic (−240/−142) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KQ76_RS13830 /KQ76_RS13835 | 2,748,571 | intergenic (−255/−127) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| mutS | 1,275,400 | K479K (AAG→AAA) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS02145 /KQ76_RS02150 | 460,550 | intergenic (+70/−69) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS10330 | 2,061,461 | Y3S (TAT→TCT) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| mnmG | 2,776,119 | L116L (TTG→TTA) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS10165 | 2,037,141 | V315L (GTA→TTA) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| KQ76_RS01915 | 411,304 | K77K (AAG→AAA) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| pflB | 200,288 | L193F (TTA→TTC) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| ylqF | 1,213,003 | E184E (GAG→GAA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| pepF | 940,717 | L493 (TTA→TGA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS12180 | 2,408,435 | L213L (TTA→CTA) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| KQ76_RS07500 | 1,547,921 | S147N (AGT→AAT) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS13475 | 2,665,475 | S163F (TCT→TTT) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| folP | 504,457 | V222I (GTA→ATA) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| KQ76_RS06970 | 1,427,399 | L5F (TTA→TTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ewunkem, A.; Dixon, J.; Queenie, J.; Iloghalu, U.; Ezeanowai, F.; Boyd, S. Green-Synthesized vs. Chemical Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Study on S. aureus Adaptability and Cross-Activity. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051114
Ewunkem A, Dixon J, Queenie J, Iloghalu U, Ezeanowai F, Boyd S. Green-Synthesized vs. Chemical Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Study on S. aureus Adaptability and Cross-Activity. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(5):1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051114
Chicago/Turabian StyleEwunkem, Akamu, Josiah Dixon, Jordan Queenie, Uchenna Iloghalu, Franklin Ezeanowai, and Sada Boyd. 2026. "Green-Synthesized vs. Chemical Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Study on S. aureus Adaptability and Cross-Activity" Microorganisms 14, no. 5: 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051114
APA StyleEwunkem, A., Dixon, J., Queenie, J., Iloghalu, U., Ezeanowai, F., & Boyd, S. (2026). Green-Synthesized vs. Chemical Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Study on S. aureus Adaptability and Cross-Activity. Microorganisms, 14(5), 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14051114

