Enhanced Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt Through Optimized Solid-State Fermentation of Myxococcus fulvus KS01 Using Insect Frass as a Matrix
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strains, Media, and Plant Materials
2.2. Screening of Solid-State Fermentation (SSF) Substrates
2.3. Single-Factor Optimization of Media Components
2.4. Optimization of Culture Conditions
2.5. Response Surface Optimization Experiments
2.5.1. Plackett Burman (PB) Tests
2.5.2. Box Behnken Design (BBD) Tests
2.5.3. Verification Experiments for Response Surface Optimization Results
2.6. Greenhouse Biocontrol Efficacy Trials
2.7. Field Biocontrol Efficacy Trials
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Screening of Initial Fermentation Substrates
3.2. Screening of Supplemental Carbon and Nitrogen Sources
3.3. Single-Factor Optimization of Fermentation Conditions
3.4. Response Surface Optimization for Myxospore Production
3.4.1. Optimized Nutrient and Cultural Conditions
3.4.2. Optimized Combination Parameters
3.4.3. Validation of Optimized Conditions
3.5. Greenhouse Biocontrol Efficacy of Optimized KS01 Solid Agent
3.6. Field Biocontrol Efficacy
3.7. Impact on Cotton Agronomic Traits and Seed Cotton Yield
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Umer, M.J.; Zheng, J.; Yang, M.; Batool, R.; Abro, A.A.; Hou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Gebremeskel, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Insights to Gossypium defense response against Verticillium dahliae: The Cotton Cancer. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2023, 23, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Tian, J.; Feng, Z.; Wang, H.; Sun, J.; Kong, Z. Chitin synthases containing myosin motor-like domain are required for cell wall integrity and virulence of vascular wilt pathogen Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathol. Res. 2023, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aini, N.; Jibril, A.N.; Liu, S.; Han, P.; Pan, Z.; Zhu, L.; Nie, X. Advances and prospects of genetic mapping of Verticillium wilt resistance in cotton. J. Cotton Res. 2022, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Kenfaoui, J.; Esmaeel, Q.; El Hamss, H.; Belabess, Z.; Barka, E.A. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: A Global Perspective. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munoz-Dorado, J.; Marcos-Torres, F.J.; Garcia-Bravo, E.; Moraleda-Munoz, A.; Perez, J. Myxobacteria: Moving, Killing, Feeding, and Surviving Together. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konovalova, A.; Petters, T.; Sogaard-Andersen, L. Extracellular biology of Myxococcus xanthus. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 34, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schaberle, T.F.; Lohr, F.; Schmitz, A.; Konig, G.M. Antibiotics from Myxobacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 953–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marshall, R.C.; Whitworth, D.E. Is “Wolf-Pack” Predation by Antimicrobial Bacteria Cooperative? Cell Behaviour and Predatory Mechanisms Indicate Profound Selfishness, Even when Working Alongside Kin. Bioessays 2019, 41, e1800247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, J.; Dong, Z.; Ji, W.; Lv, W.; Luo, M.; Fu, B. From predator to protector: Myxococcus fulvus WCH05 emerges as a potent biocontrol agent for fire blight. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1378288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-T.; Yun, S.C. Biocontrol with Myxococcus sp. KYC 1126 Against Anthracnose in Hot Pepper. Plant Pathol. J. 2011, 27, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Xu, X.; Gao, R.; Li, Y.; Li, A.; Yao, Q.; Zhu, H. Myxococcus xanthus R31 Suppresses Tomato Bacterial Wilt by Inhibiting the Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum With Secreted Proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 801091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ye, X.; Li, Z.; Luo, X.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Li, R.; Zhang, B.; Qiao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Fan, J.; et al. A predatory myxobacterium controls cucumber Fusarium wilt by regulating the soil microbial community. Microbiome 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contreras-Moreno, F.J.; Perez, J.; Munoz-Dorado, J.; Moraleda-Munoz, A.; Marcos-Torres, F.J. Myxococcus xanthus predation: An updated overview. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1339696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lall, D.; Glaser, M.M.; Higgs, P.I. Myxococcus xanthus fruiting body morphology is important for spore recovery after exposure to environmental stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2024, 90, e0166024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E.; Prabhu, S.R.; Hernandez, J.-P. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: Formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil 2014, 378, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vassileva, M.; Malusa, E.; Sas-Paszt, L.; Trzcinski, P.; Galvez, A.; Flor-Peregrin, E.; Shilev, S.; Canfora, L.; Mocali, S.; Vassilev, N. Fermentation Strategies to Improve Soil Bio-Inoculant Production and Quality. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ptaszek, M.; Canfora, L.; Pugliese, M.; Pinzari, F.; Gilardi, G.; Trzcinski, P.; Malusa, E. Microbial-Based Products to Control Soil-Borne Pathogens: Methods to Improve Efficacy and to Assess Impacts on Microbiome. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashworth, A.J.; Amorim, H.C.S.; Drescher, G.L.; Moore, P.A.; Rojas, M.G.; Morales-Ramos, J.; Donoghue, A.M. Insect frass fertilizer as soil amendment for improved forage and soil health in circular systems. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, W.; Duo, X.; Luo, M.; Ma, D.; Lu, W.; Han, J. Screening of Myxobacterial Strains for Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt and Their Biocontrol Potential. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2024, 40, 1074–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Shi, M.; Dou, X.; Pan, W.; Ma, D.; Luo, M.; Fu, B. Cystobacter fuscus HM-E: A novel biocontrol agent against cotton Verticillium wilt. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1555523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Peng, X.; Peng, Y. Planting Performance of Different New Cotton Varieties in Bachu. Tillage Cultiv. 2020, 40, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakonyi, P.; Nemestóthy, N.; Lövitusz, É.; Bélafi-Bakó, K. Application of Plackett–Burman experimental design to optimize biohydrogen fermentation by E. coli (XL1-BLUE). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 13949–13954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, J.S.; Kumar, B. 3D Blade root shape optimization. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, London, UK, 11–13 September 2012; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, S.; Shoda, M. Statistical optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production using Box-Behnken design. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, F.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Feng, H.; Zhao, L.; Feng, Z.; Zhu, H. Evaluation of the Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Fungus Fusarium solani CEF559 against Verticillium dahliae in Cotton Plant. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 3187943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, L.; Xue, Q.; Chen, Q.; Lin, C.; Shen, G.; Zhao, J. Isolation and evaluation of rhizosphere actinomycetes with potential application for biocontrol of Verticillium wilt of cotton. Crop Prot. 2013, 43, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Feng, Z.; Li, Z.; Feng, H.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H. Development of an Improved Standard for Identifying and Evaluating Verticillium Wilt Resistance in Cotton. Cotton Sci. 2017, 29, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Lan, X.; Jia, R.; Hu, L.; Wang, Y. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Mediated Optimization of Medium Components for Mycelial Growth and Metabolites Production of Streptomyces alfalfae XN-04. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connor, K.A.; Zusman, D.R. Development in Myxococcus xanthus involves differentiation into two cell types, peripheral rods and spores. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 3318–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saggu, S.K.; Nath, A.; Kumar, S. Myxobacteria: Biology and bioactive secondary metabolites. Res. Microbiol. 2023, 174, 104079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papin, M.; Philippot, L.; Breuil, M.C.; Bru, D.; Dreux-Zigha, A.; Mounier, A.; Le Roux, X.; Rouard, N.; Spor, A. Survival of a microbial inoculant in soil after recurrent inoculations. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, K.; Li, X.; Dong, L.; Cui, Z.; Cao, H. Regulation of Myxococcus sp. BS on soil fungal diversity and community assembly processes in the tobacco-rice rotation fields. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2023, 46, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Commichau, F.M.; Forchhammer, K.; Stülke, J. Regulatory links between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, D. Coupling cell movement to multicellular development in myxobacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2003, 1, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitfield, D.L.; Sharma, G.; Smaldone, G.T.; Singer, M. Peripheral rods: A specialized developmental cell type in Myxococcus xanthus. Genomics 2020, 112, 1588–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, C.; Cheng, L.; Hong, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, C.; Ban, X.; Gu, Z. Study on the gelatinization and digestive characteristics of wheat starch and potato starch under low moisture conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 269, 132192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graniczkowska, K.B.; Bizhga, D.; Noda, M.; Leon, V.; Saraf, N.; Feliz, D.; Sharma, G.; Nugent, A.C.; Singer, M.; Stojkovic, E.A. Photomorphogenesis of Myxococcus macrosporus: New insights for light-regulation of cell development. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2024, 23, 1857–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Xu, F.; Lei, J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; Mao, D.; Ye, X.; Huang, Y.; et al. Genome analysis of a plasmid-bearing myxobacterim Myxococcus sp. strain MxC21 with salt-tolerant property. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1250602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Xie, X.; Zhang, X.; Cai, Z.; Zhu, H. Influence of different prey strains on isolation myxobacteria in saline-alkaline soils of Xinjiang. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2013, 53, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tan, Z.; Guo, J.; Zhu, H. Isolation and identification of cultivable myxobacteria in the rhizosphere soils of medicinal plants. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2013, 53, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oostra, J.; Le Comte, E.P.; van den Heuvel, J.C.; Tramper, J.; Rinzema, A. Intra-particle oxygen diffusion limitation in solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 75, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimkets, L.J. Social and developmental biology of the myxobacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1990, 54, 473–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaplan, H.B.; Plamann, L. A Myxococcus xanthus cell density-sensing system required for multicellular development. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1996, 139, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, X.W.; Li, S.G.; Li, W.; Jiang, D.M.; Han, K.; Wu, Z.H.; Li, Y.Z. Myxobacterial community is a predominant and highly diverse bacterial group in soil niches. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2014, 6, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Source | Coefficient | Stdized Effect | Contribution/% | Sum of Squares | Mean Square | F | p | Importance Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.5592 | 1.118 | 46.20 | 3.75 | 3.75 | 44.82 | 0.0011 | 1 |
| B | 0.3958 | 0.792 | 23.15 | 1.88 | 1.88 | 22.46 | 0.0052 | 2 |
| C | 0.0608 | 0.122 | 0.55 | 0.0444 | 0.0444 | 0.5305 | 0.4991 | 6 |
| D | 0.1492 | 0.298 | 3.29 | 0.2670 | 0.2670 | 3.19 | 0.1342 | 5 |
| E | 0.2642 | 0.528 | 10.31 | 0.8374 | 0.8374 | 10.00 | 0.0250 | 4 |
| F | 0.2825 | 0.565 | 11.79 | 0.9577 | 0.9577 | 11.44 | 0.0196 | 3 |
| Model | 2.46 | 0 | 0 | 7.74 | 1.29 | 15.41 | 0.0044 |
| Source | Sum of | df | Mean | F | p | Distinctiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 86.69 | 14 | 6.19 | 74.37 | <0.0001 | ** |
| A | 3.62 | 1 | 3.62 | 43.43 | <0.0001 | ** |
| B | 0.4602 | 1 | 0.4602 | 5.52 | 0.0340 | * |
| C | 0.0397 | 1 | 0.0397 | 0.4761 | 0.5015 | |
| D | 0.0252 | 1 | 0.0252 | 0.325 | 0.591 | |
| AB | 3.74 | 1 | 3.74 | 44.93 | <0.0001 | ** |
| AC | 0.2862 | 1 | 0.2862 | 3.43 | 0.0850 | |
| AD | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | 0.9864 | |
| BC | 1.02 | 1 | 1.02 | 12.24 | 0.003.5 | ** |
| BD | 0.5476 | 1 | 0.5476 | 6.57 | 0.0225 | * |
| CD | 0.5929 | 1 | 0.5929 | 7.11 | 0.0184 | * |
| A2 | 29.65 | 1 | 29.65 | 3.55.86 | <0.0001 | ** |
| B2 | 20.68 | 1 | 20.68 | 248.19 | <0.0001 | ** |
| C2 | 25.83 | 1 | 25.83 | 31.00 | <0.0001 | ** |
| D2 | 41.71 | 1 | 41.71 | 500.47 | <0.0001 | ** |
| Residual | 1.17 | 14 | 0.0833 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 0.8376 | 1 | 0.0838 | 1.02 | 0.5403 | |
| Pure Error | 0.3291 | 4 | 0.0823 | |||
| Cor Total | 87.86 | 28 |
| Treatment | Incidence (%) | Disease Index | Efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| USFK + Vd | 26.67 ± 2.9 b | 12.7 ± 0.8 cd | 63.8 ± 2.2 b |
| OSFK + Vd | 13.33 ± 5.8 c | 9.8 ± 2.3 d | 71.9 ± 6.4 a |
| SSFS + Vd | 33.33 ± 5.8 ab | 23.3 ± 1.4 b | 33.3 ± 4.1 d |
| Benziothiazolinone | 30.0 ± 5.0 b | 15.8 ± 1.4 c | 54.8 ± 4.1 c |
| Vd | 43.3 ± 5.8 a | 35.0 ± 2.5 a | - |
| Treatment | Squaring Stage | Flowering and Bolling Stage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence % | Disease Index | Control Effect % | Incidence Rate % | Disease Index | Control Effect % | |
| SFK | 32.0 ± 2.0 b | 8.5 ± 0.5 c | 71.2 ± 1.7 a | 50.0 ± 2.6 c | 20.2 ± 1.0 d | 54.5 ± 2.3 a |
| SSFS | 49.3 ± 1.2 a | 16.3 ± 0.6 b | 44.6 ± 2.0 c | 58.7 ± 1.5 b | 28.8 ± 0.3 b | 35.0 ± 0.7 c |
| Benziothiazolinone | 33.3 ± 4.2 b | 14.3 ± 0.8 b | 51.4 ± 2.6 b | 57.3 ± 3.1 b | 26.0 ± 0.5 c | 41.4 ± 1.1 b |
| CK | 54.7 ± 4.6 a | 29.5 ± 2.2 a | - | 70.7 ± 1.5 a | 44.3 ± 1.6 a | - |
| Treatment | Plant Height (cm) | Stem Diameter (mm) | Boll Number | Fruit Branch Number | Leaf Number | Seed Cotton Yield (kg/ha) | Yield Enhancement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKF | 84.7 ± 1.5 a | 11.0 ± 0.2 a | 12.4 ± 0.6 a | 11.7 ± 0.9 a | 34.2 ± 0.8 a | 5380.0 ± 192.7 a | 50.4 |
| SSFS | 77.9 ± 1.3 b | 10.4 ± 0.3 ab | 10.5 ± 0.2 b | 10.0 ± 0.7 b | 32.7 ± 2.5 ab | 4307.5 ± 193.6 b | 20.4 |
| Benziothiazolinone | 75.5 ± 2.1 bc | 10.0 ± 0.5 bc | 10.3 ± 0.2 b | 9.6 ± 0.1 b | 29.8 ± 1.5 bc | 4117.5 ± 130.1 b | 15.1 |
| CK | 73.4 ± 1.0 c | 9.8 ± 0.2 c | 9.6 ± 0.1 c | 9.2 ± 0.1 b | 26.5 ± 2.4 c | 3577.5 ± 97.5 c | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Han, J.; Chen, Y.; Sheng, Q.; Lu, W.; Luo, M.; Fu, B.; Ma, D. Enhanced Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt Through Optimized Solid-State Fermentation of Myxococcus fulvus KS01 Using Insect Frass as a Matrix. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14030610
Han J, Chen Y, Sheng Q, Lu W, Luo M, Fu B, Ma D. Enhanced Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt Through Optimized Solid-State Fermentation of Myxococcus fulvus KS01 Using Insect Frass as a Matrix. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(3):610. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14030610
Chicago/Turabian StyleHan, Jian, Yongcheng Chen, Qiang Sheng, Wei Lu, Ming Luo, Benzhong Fu, and Deying Ma. 2026. "Enhanced Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt Through Optimized Solid-State Fermentation of Myxococcus fulvus KS01 Using Insect Frass as a Matrix" Microorganisms 14, no. 3: 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14030610
APA StyleHan, J., Chen, Y., Sheng, Q., Lu, W., Luo, M., Fu, B., & Ma, D. (2026). Enhanced Biocontrol of Cotton Verticillium Wilt Through Optimized Solid-State Fermentation of Myxococcus fulvus KS01 Using Insect Frass as a Matrix. Microorganisms, 14(3), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14030610

