Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria Isolated from a Microbial Consortium Previously Subjected to Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in Oily Sludge
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Origin of Microorganisms
2.2. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis
2.2.1. Extraction, Quantification and Assessment of Genomic DNA Purity
2.2.2. Amplification of the 16S rDNA Gene by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
2.2.3. Electrophoresis, Purification and Preparation for Sequencing
2.2.4. Sequencing and Assembly of Sequences
2.2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis
2.3. Assessment of Cultivation Conditions Influencing Biosurfactant Production
2.3.1. Design of Experiments (DOE) for Exploratory Evaluation of Biosurfactant Production
2.3.2. Emulsification Activity Index () as a Semi-Quantitative Response Variable
2.4. Preliminary Structural Characterization of Biosurfactants
2.4.1. Precipitation of Biosurfactants
2.4.2. Preliminary Characterization of Biosurfactants by FTIR-ATR
3. Results
3.1. Taxonomic Diversity and Phenotypic Convergence Within the Microbial Consortium of Origin
3.2. Analysis of Cultivation Conditions Associated with Biosurfactant Production
3.3. Preliminary Structural and Spectroscopic Characterization by FTIR-ATR
4. Discussion
4.1. Taxonomic Diversity and Functional Convergence of the Microbial Consortium of Origin
4.2. Cultivation Conditions and Strain-Specific Differences in Biosurfactant Production Robustness
4.3. Spectroscopic Evidence of Phenotypic Convergence Toward Lipopeptide-like Biosurfactants
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Farias, C.B.B.; Almeida, F.C.G.; Silva, I.A.; Souza, T.C.; Meira, H.M.; Soares da Silva, R.d.C.F.; Luna, J.M.; Santos, V.A.; Converti, A.; Banat, I.M.; et al. Production of Green Surfactants: Market Prospects. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 51, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, P.; Trybala, A.; Starov, V.; Pinfield, V.J. Effect of Synthetic Surfactants on the Environment and the Potential for Substitution by Biosurfactants. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 288, 102340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagtode, V.S.; Cardoza, C.; Yasin, H.K.A.; Mali, S.N.; Tambe, S.M.; Roy, P.; Singh, K.; Goel, A.; Amin, P.D.; Thorat, B.R.; et al. Green Surfactants (Biosurfactants): A Petroleum-Free Substitute for Sustainability—Comparison, Applications, Market, and Future Prospects. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 11674–11699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Marri, S.; Eldos, H.I.; Ashfaq, M.Y.; Saeed, S.; Skariah, S.; Varghese, L.; Mohamoud, Y.A.; Sultan, A.A.; Raja, M.M. Isolation, Identification, and Screening of Biosurfactant-Producing and Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria from Oil and Gas Industrial Waste. Biotechnol. Rep. 2023, 39, e00804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inamuddin; Ahamed, M.I.; Prasad, R. (Eds.) Microbial Biosurfactants: Preparation, Properties and Applications; Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology; Springer: Singapore, 2021; ISBN 978-981-15-6606-6. [Google Scholar]
- Sarubbo, L.A.; Silva, M.D.G.C.; Durval, I.J.B.; Bezerra, K.G.O.; Ribeiro, B.G.; Silva, I.A.; Twigg, M.S.; Banat, I.M. Biosurfactants: Production, Properties, Applications, Trends, and General Perspectives. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 181, 108377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, V.; Baghmare, P.; Verma, A.; Verma, J.S.; Geed, S.R. Recent Progress in Microbial Biosurfactants Production Strategies: Applications, Technological Bottlenecks, and Future Outlook. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 408, 131211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fung, K.C.L.; Dornelles, H.S.; Varesche, M.B.A.; Gutierrez, T. From Wastewater Treatment Plants to the Oceans: A Review on Synthetic Chemical Surfactants (SCSs) and Perspectives on Marine-Safe Biosurfactants. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zargar, A.N.; Kumar, M.; Srivastava, P. Biosurfactants: Challenges and Future Outlooks. In Advancements in Biosurfactants Research; Aslam, R., Mobin, M., Aslam, J., Zehra, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 551–576. ISBN 978-3-031-21681-7. [Google Scholar]
- Bertrand, B.; Martínez-Morales, F.; Rosas-Galván, N.S.; Morales-Guzmán, D.; Trejo-Hernández, M.R. Statistical Design, a Powerful Tool for Optimizing Biosurfactant Production: A Review. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, M.I.; Iemma, A.F. Experimental Design and Process Optimization, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-0-429-16186-5. [Google Scholar]
- Becker, L.; Sturm, J.; Eiden, F.; Holtmann, D. Analyzing and Understanding the Robustness of Bioprocesses. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 1013–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steensels, J.; Gallone, B.; Voordeckers, K.; Verstrepen, K.J. Domestication of Industrial Microbes. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R381–R393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adade, N.E.; Ahator, S.D.; García-Romero, I.; Algarañás, M.; Appiah, V.; Valvano, M.A.; Duodu, S. Stress Adaptation under in Vitro Evolution Influences Survival and Metabolic Phenotypes of Clinical and Environmental Strains of Vibrio cholerae El-Tor. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e01211-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandberg, T.E.; Salazar, M.J.; Weng, L.L.; Palsson, B.O.; Feist, A.M. The Emergence of Adaptive Laboratory Evolution as an Efficient Tool for Biological Discovery and Industrial Biotechnology. Metab. Eng. 2019, 56, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wehrs, M.; Tanjore, D.; Eng, T.; Lievense, J.; Pray, T.R.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Engineering Robust Production Microbes for Large-Scale Cultivation. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Márquez-Villa, J.M.; Mateos-Díaz, J.C.; Rodríguez-González, J.A.; Camacho-Ruíz, R.M. Optimization of Lipopeptide Biosurfactant Production by Salibacterium sp. 4CTb in Batch Stirred-Tank Bioreactors. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maciel, B.M.; Dias, J.C.T.; Freire Dos Santos, A.C.; Argôlo Filho, R.C.; Fontana, R.; Loguercio, L.L.; Rezende, R.P. Microbial Surfactant Activities from a Petrochemical Landfarm in a Humid Tropical Region of Brazil. Can. J. Microbiol. 2007, 53, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for Phylogenetic Study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorado Pérez, G. Prácticas Generales de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular. Secuenciación del DNA; Departamento de Bioquímica y Biologia Molecular, Universidad de Córdoba: Córdoba, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Okonechnikov, K.; Golosova, O.; Fursov, M.; the UGENE team. Unipro UGENE: A Unified Bioinformatics Toolkit. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, X.; Madan, A. CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 868–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT Online Service: Multiple Sequence Alignment, Interactive Sequence Choice and Visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent Updates to the Phylogenetic Tree Display and Annotation Tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoeb, E.; Ahmed, N.; Akhter, J.; Badar, U.; Siddiqui, K.; Ansari, F.A.; Waqar, M.; Imtiaz, S.; Akhtar, N.; Shaikh, Q.U.A.; et al. Screening and Characterization of Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria Isolated from the Arabian Sea Coast of Karachi. Turk. J. Biol. 2015, 39, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pruthi, V.; Cameotra, S.S. Rapid Method for Monitoring Maximum Biosurfactant Production Obtained by Acetone Precipitation. Biotechnol. Tech. 1995, 9, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guimarães, A.C.; Leonarski, E.; Cesca, K.; Poletto, P. Bacterial Cellulose from Kombucha: Assessing Inoculum Age and Concentration, and Its Conversion via Enzymatic Hydrolysis into Cellobiose and Glucose. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 59, 103244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinu, F.R.; Stuart, L.; Topal, T.; Albright, A.; Martin, D.; Grose, C. The Effect of Yeast Inoculation Methods on the Metabolite Composition of Sauvignon Blanc Wines. Fermentation 2023, 9, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchut-Mikołajczyk, O.; Drożdżyński, P.; Polewczyk, A.; Smułek, W.; Antczak, T. Biosurfactant from Endophytic Bacillus Pumilus 2A: Physicochemical Characterization, Production and Optimization and Potential for Plant Growth Promotion. Microb. Cell Factories 2021, 20, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldford, J.E.; Lu, N.; Bajić, D.; Estrela, S.; Tikhonov, M.; Sanchez-Gorostiaga, A.; Segrè, D.; Mehta, P.; Sanchez, A. Emergent Simplicity in Microbial Community Assembly. Science 2018, 361, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaczorek, E.; Pacholak, A.; Zdarta, A.; Smułek, W. The Impact of Biosurfactants on Microbial Cell Properties Leading to Hydrocarbon Bioavailability Increase. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ambust, S.; Das, A.J.; Kumar, R. Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil through Biosurfactant and Pseudomonas sp. SA3 Amended Design Treatments. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, M.; Zhang, H.; Cui, W.; Su, Y.; Sun, S.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Q. Performance Evaluation of Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant Produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Its Effect on Marine Oil-Spill Remediation. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos Neto, G.; Marques, E.D.L.S.; Oliveira, L.K.S.; Rezende, R.P.; Dias, J.C.T. Searching for Bacteria Able to Metabolize Polycyclic Aromatic Sulfur Compounds in 12-Years Periodically Fed Bioreactor. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banat, I.M.; Rahman, K.S.M.; Thahira-Rahman, J. Thahira-Rahman Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Pollution Using Biosurfactant Producing Oil Degrading Bacteria. In Oil and Hydrocarbon Spills III; Brebbia, C.A., Ed.; WIT Press: Billerica, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Patowary, R.; Rajbongshi, B.; Devi, A.; Sen, B.; Goswami, M.; Sarma, H. Biosurfactant-Enhanced Bioremediation of Petroleum Sludge: Unveiling the Potential of Enterobacter cloacae AR-IASST (01). Next Sustain. 2024, 3, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wan, S.; Yu, W.; Yuan, D.; Sun, L. Newly Isolated Enterobacter cloacae sp. HN01 and Klebsiella pneumoniae sp. HN02 Collaborate with Self-Secreted Biosurfactant to Improve Solubility and Bioavailability for the Biodegradation of Hydrophobic and Toxic Gaseous Para-Xylene. Chemosphere 2022, 304, 135328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sbissi, I.; Kammoun, I.; El May, H.; Bouzidi, T.; Ghodhbane-Gtari, F.; Gtari, M. Reclassification of Moraxella boevrei, M. osloensis and M. atlantae, into the Genus Faucicola, and Proposal of a New Genus within the Family Moraxellaceae, Lwoffella lincolnii gen. nov., comb. nov., to Accommodate the Divergent Species Moraxella lincolnii. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2025, 75, 006820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maheswaran, B.; Sebastin Raj, J.; Pandiyarajan, P.; Jaya Santhi, R.; Mythili, R.; K.S, V.; Kim, W.; Karmegam, N.; Govarthanan, M. Polyurethane Degradation by Extracellular Urethanase Producing Bacterial Isolate Moraxella catarrhalis Strain BMPPS3. Environ. Res. 2024, 251, 118631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mavrommati, M.; Daskalaki, A.; Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution Principles and Applications in Industrial Biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 54, 107795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martinez, S.; Bernard, D.N.; Groleau, M.-C.; Trottier, M.C.; Déziel, E. Implementation of an Adaptive Laboratory Evolution Strategy for Improved Production of Valuable Microbial Secondary Metabolites. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 425, 132255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darvishi, P.; Ayatollahi, S.; Mowla, D.; Niazi, A. Biosurfactant Production under Extreme Environmental Conditions by an Efficient Microbial Consortium, ERCPPI-2. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 84, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, S.; Pandey, L.M. Production of Biosurfactant by Bacillus subtilis RSL-2 Isolated from Sludge and Biosurfactant Mediated Degradation of Oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 307, 123261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elazzazy, A.M.; Abdelmoneim, T.S.; Almaghrabi, O.A. Isolation and Characterization of Biosurfactant Production under Extreme Environmental Conditions by Alkali-Halo-Thermophilic Bacteria from Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, M.H.; Martins, R.G.; Costa, J.A.V. Avaliação Cinética Da Produção de Biossurfactantes Bacterianos. Quím. Nova 2009, 32, 2104–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jiang, J.; Sun, Y.-F.; Tang, X.; He, C.-N.; Shao, Y.-L.; Tang, Y.-J.; Zhou, W.-W. Alkaline pH Shock Enhanced Production of Validamycin A in Fermentation of Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, S.; Awasthi, D.; Chen, Y.; Gin, J.; Petzold, C.J.; Adams, P.D.; Simmons, B.A.; Singer, S.W. Simultaneous Carbon Catabolite Repression Governs Sugar and Aromatic Co-Utilization in Pseudomonas putida M2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0085223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnleitner, E.; Abdou, L.; Haas, D. Small RNA as Global Regulator of Carbon Catabolite Repression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009, 106, 21866–21871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onwosi, C.O.; Odibo, F.J.C. Effects of Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant Production by Pseudomonas nitroreducens Isolated from Soil. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.-Y.; Yeh, K.-L.; Lu, W.-B.; Lin, C.-L.; Chang, J.-S. Rhamnolipid Production with Indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa EM1 Isolated from Oil-Contaminated Site. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1157–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, D.G.; Soares da Silva, R.d.C.F.; Luna, J.M.; Rufino, R.D.; Santos, V.A.; Sarubbo, L.A. Response Surface Methodology for Optimizing the Production of Biosurfactant by Candida tropicalis on Industrial Waste Substrates. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, P. Optimization and Characterization of Biosurfactant Production from Marine Vibrio sp. Strain 3B-2. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franzol, A.; Rezende, M.C. Estabilidade de Emulsões: Um Estudo de Caso Envolvendo Emulsionantes Aniônico, Catiônico e Não-Iônico. Polímeros 2015, 25, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsson, L.; Rugbjerg, P.; Torello Pianale, L.; Trivellin, C. Robustness: Linking Strain Design to Viable Bioprocesses. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heins, A.-L.; Weuster-Botz, D. Population Heterogeneity in Microbial Bioprocesses: Origin, Analysis, Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 41, 889–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirasawa, T.; Maeda, T. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms: Methodology and Application for Bioproduction. Microorganisms 2022, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blöbaum, L.; Haringa, C.; Grünberger, A. Microbial Lifelines in Bioprocesses: From Concept to Application. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 62, 108071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.-C.; Juang, R.-S.; Wei, Y.-H. Applications of a Lipopeptide Biosurfactant, Surfactin, Produced by Microorganisms. Biochem. Eng. J. 2015, 103, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Niu, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Lv, J. Optimization of Lipopeptide Biosurfactant Production by Bacillus licheniformis L20 and Performance Evaluation of Biosurfactant Mixed System for Enhanced Oil Recovery. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 208, 109678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thavasi, R.; Subramanyam Nambaru, V.R.M.; Jayalakshmi, S.; Balasubramanian, T.; Banat, I.M. Biosurfactant Production by Azotobacter chroococcum Isolated from the Marine Environment. Mar. Biotechnol. 2009, 11, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Måge, I.; Böcker, U.; Wubshet, S.G.; Lindberg, D.; Afseth, N.K. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Fingerprinting for Quality Assessment of Protein Hydrolysates. LWT 2021, 152, 112339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuart, B.H. Infrared Spectroscopy of Biological Applications: An Overview. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry; Meyers, R.A., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0-471-97670-7. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, N.; Pang, Z.; Wang, F.; Xu, B.; El-Seedi, H.R. Lipopeptide Biosurfactants from Bacillus spp.: Types, Production, Biological Activities, and Applications in Food. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 3930112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carolin C, F.; Kumar, P.S.; Ngueagni, P.T. A Review on New Aspects of Lipopeptide Biosurfactant: Types, Production, Properties and Its Application in the Bioremediation Process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 407, 124827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inès, M.; Dhouha, G. Lipopeptide Surfactants: Production, Recovery and Pore Forming Capacity. Peptides 2015, 71, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Cai, Q.; Cao, Y.; Ling, J.; Lee, K.; Chen, B. A Critical Review on the Environmental Application of Lipopeptide Micelles. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 339, 125602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Coded Variable | Dextrose—D [% (w/v)] | ph | Temperature—T (°C) | Inoculum *—I [% (v/v)] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | −1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 20.0 | 1.0 |
| 0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 28.5 | 3.0 | |
| 1 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 37.0 | 5.0 | |
| CCRD | −1.681 | 0.000 | 8.50 | 35.0 | - |
| −1 | 0.203 | 9.21 | 37.6 | - | |
| 0 | 0.500 | 10.25 | 41.5 | - | |
| +1 | 0.797 | 11.29 | 45.4 | - | |
| +1.681 | 1.000 | 12.00 | 48.0 | - |
| Assay | Coded Variables | Results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dextrose—D [% (w/v)] | pH | Temperature—T (°C) | Inoculum—I [% (v/v)] | BS16B | BS14MR | BS5C | |
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 52.28 | 3.73 | 0.00 |
| 2 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 29.73 | 9.26 | 15.96 |
| 3 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 4.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 4 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 61.29 | 45.25 | 65.84 |
| 5 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 12.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 59.82 | 59.98 | 25.68 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 40.61 | 30.80 | 68.19 |
| 8 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 32.36 | 35.27 | 53.72 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.35 | 16.23 | 19.33 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.41 | 12.97 | 26.93 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53.52 | 28.58 | 11.76 |
| Assay | Coded Variables | Results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dextrose—D [% (w/v)] | pH | Temperature—T (°C) | BS16B | BS14MR | BS5C | |
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 28.32 | 47.74 | 57.88 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 16.75 | 38.29 | 56.05 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 50.31 | 13.93 | 42.75 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 22.38 | 8.75 | 3.85 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 55.78 | 41.63 | 55.53 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 28.76 | 58.21 | 59.24 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 36.58 | 38.35 | 3.56 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 45.54 | 50.66 | 3.16 |
| 9 | −1.681 | 0 | 0 | 60.25 | 55.99 | 29.13 |
| 10 | 1.681 | 0 | 0 | 49.64 | 5.10 | 3.14 |
| 11 | 0 | −1.681 | 0 | 17.42 | 33.00 | 23.66 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.681 | 0 | 4.49 | 3.26 | 5.16 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −1.681 | 43.43 | 34.73 | 44.15 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.681 | 59.65 | 38.48 | 9.76 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47.29 | 43.71 | 37.98 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51.56 | 38.78 | 33.31 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.52 | 37.07 | 40.31 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Bessa Souza, M.C.; Rezende, R.P.; Dotivo, N.C.; Freitas, A.M.d.; Aguiar-Oliveira, E.; Salay, L.C.; Marques, E.d.L.S.; Moura, S.R.d.; Ferreira, E.S.; Ferreira, L.S.; et al. Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria Isolated from a Microbial Consortium Previously Subjected to Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in Oily Sludge. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020503
Bessa Souza MC, Rezende RP, Dotivo NC, Freitas AMd, Aguiar-Oliveira E, Salay LC, Marques EdLS, Moura SRd, Ferreira ES, Ferreira LS, et al. Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria Isolated from a Microbial Consortium Previously Subjected to Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in Oily Sludge. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(2):503. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020503
Chicago/Turabian StyleBessa Souza, Maria Clara, Rachel Passos Rezende, Natielle Cachoeira Dotivo, Angelina Moreira de Freitas, Elizama Aguiar-Oliveira, Luiz Carlos Salay, Eric de Lima Silva Marques, Suzana Rodrigues de Moura, Erivelton Santana Ferreira, Luana Silva Ferreira, and et al. 2026. "Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria Isolated from a Microbial Consortium Previously Subjected to Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in Oily Sludge" Microorganisms 14, no. 2: 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020503
APA StyleBessa Souza, M. C., Rezende, R. P., Dotivo, N. C., Freitas, A. M. d., Aguiar-Oliveira, E., Salay, L. C., Marques, E. d. L. S., Moura, S. R. d., Ferreira, E. S., Ferreira, L. S., Bonfim, H. A. R., Thompson, F. L., Maciel, B. M., & Dias, J. C. T. (2026). Biosurfactant-Producing Bacteria Isolated from a Microbial Consortium Previously Subjected to Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in Oily Sludge. Microorganisms, 14(2), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020503

