Next Article in Journal
Helicobacter pylori Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance over 25 Years in Children in Gipuzkoa, Northern Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Draft Genome Sequence of Bacillus sp. Strain 11B20, a Promising Plant-Growth Promoting Bacterium Associated with Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Basic Microbiome Analysis: Analytical Steps from Sampling to Sequencing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacterial Community Structure and Environmental Adaptation in the Endorhizosphere and Rhizosphere Soils of Aeluropus sinensis from Saline Lands Across Coastal and Inland Regions of China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tree Species Mixing Regulates Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling by Altering Microbial Network Complexity and Assembly Processes in Larix olgensis

1
Jilin Provincial Academy of Forestry Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
2
The Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda, Chengdu 610081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(2), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020388
Submission received: 15 January 2026 / Revised: 30 January 2026 / Accepted: 4 February 2026 / Published: 6 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant–Soil–Microbe Interactions)

Abstract

Establishing mixed conifer–broadleaf forests enhances soil multi-nutrient cycling (SMC), yet the underlying mechanisms, particularly the role of rhizosphere microbial communities, remain poorly understood. This study investigated how bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere soil of Larix olgensis drive SMC in both pure and mixed plantations with Fraxinus mandshurica, elucidating the microbial pathways for nutrient supply in mixed stands. Our results indicated that SMC in the L. olgensis rhizosphere soil was significantly greater in mixed stands (0.43) than in pure stands (−0.51). Tree species mixing significantly enhanced microbial diversity, increased the stochasticity of community assembly, and reduced dispersal limitation. Cross-kingdom (bacteria–fungi) co-occurrence networks in mixed stands showed a 19.7% increase in positive correlations, indicating stronger microbial cooperation. Random forest analysis identified microbial diversity, network complexity, and bacterial assembly processes as the main predictors of SMC. Structural equation modeling indicated that microbial diversity indirectly promoted SMC via increased network complexity, while bacterial assembly processes directly influenced SMC. These findings demonstrate that mixed conifer–broadleaf plantations improve soil microbial functioning and nutrient cycling by modifying microbial diversity, assembly processes, and interaction networks.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Forests cover nearly one-third of Earth’s terrestrial ecosystems and play a crucial role in maintaining soil ecological functions, such as nutrient cycling, soil fertility maintenance, and water conservation [1]. China has the largest plantation area in the world, totaling 80 million hectares and accounting for 36% of its total forest cover. However, inadequate plantation management can trigger ecological risks that severely constrain sustainable development [2]. In particular, large-scale, high-density monocultures of coniferous species, such as pure L. olgensis stands, can lead to soil fertility degradation, biodiversity loss, and slow ecosystem nutrient turnover, ultimately hindering the sustainable development of plantations [3]. To improve plantation soil quality, many regions have begun implementing silvicultural models, such as mixed conifer–broadleaf plantations, which improve soil nutrient status and ecosystem stability [4]. Compared with conventional methods that focus on individual nutrients, the soil multi-nutrient cycling (SMC) index concurrently accounts for the concentrations of multiple nutrient elements and their interactions, thereby offering a more systematic appraisal of how soils respond to environmental change and of their capacity to sustain ecosystem biodiversity [5]. Moreover, soil microorganisms play a central role in regulating the SMC index [6]. Their physiological status and metabolic functions are highly sensitive to environmental change, and prolonged disturbances can induce nondirectional shifts in functional composition, thereby altering nutrient transformation efficiency and balance [7]. A more precise explanation of the relationship between microbial community structure and the SMC helps to avoid overinterpreting microbial functional redundancy. This enables the direct assessment of the contribution of microbial diversity to SMC [8]. Consequently, understanding the interaction mechanisms between the structure of the microbial community in plantation soils and SMC is crucial for optimizing stand productivity and managing ecosystem health.
However, the relationships between microbial communities and the SMC index remain unclear [9]. Studies have reported negative, positive, or nonsignificant associations between microbial diversity and SMC [10,11,12,13,14]. This discrepancy is because most studies have only examined simple correlations between microbial diversity or community composition and SMC, overlooking the way in which complex interspecific interactions modulate this relationship. Recent studies have demonstrated that microbiome complexity and community assembly processes are pivotal in driving soil ecosystem biogeochemical cycling, energy flow, and information transfer [15]. Microbial network analysis and community assembly processes can reveal complex interspecific interactions (e.g., competition, cooperation, and antagonism) and mechanisms of community formation (deterministic versus stochastic processes). This finding reveals many important ecological processes and functional linkages that diversity metrics alone fail to capture [16]. Therefore, the relationship between microbial diversity and the soil multi-nutrient cycling (SMC) index is likely dependent on microbial network characteristics and community assembly dynamics. Moreover, functional redundancy is widespread within microbial communities. Despite marked differences in species composition, taxa that carry out key metabolic functions often exhibit replacement and compensatory dynamics. While this functional redundancy underpins the temporal stability of ecosystem processes, it also implies that metrics of species richness alone are insufficient to resolve the functional dynamics of microbial communities or to reveal the intrinsic mechanisms by which they govern shifts in the SMC index [17]. Notably, the relationships between microbial community attributes and the SMC index are strongly influenced by environmental factors, such as stand type and tree identity [18], as well as by soil properties, such as soil moisture and pH [19,20]. For instance, research conducted in Chinese fir plantations has revealed that conifer–broadleaf combinations can substantially increase stand-level SMC [6]. However, broadleaf species often have a competitive advantage because of their superior ability to acquire nutrients, which can intensify nutrient competition within mixed stands [6]. In response, conifers typically increase their root biomass and exudation and allocate more carbon belowground. This reshapes the rhizosphere microbial communities and soil nutrient-cycling processes, thereby offsetting their disadvantage in nutrient uptake [21]. While the adaptive strategies of conifers in mixed stands have been partially documented, the specific mechanisms by which they regulate rhizosphere microbial communities to maintain SMC remain unclear. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically assess and quantify the effects of tree species composition on conifer rhizosphere soil properties and microbial community structure. These findings clarify how these changes affect SMC and deepen our understanding of conifer ecological adaptation under strong competition from broadleaf species.
Larix olgensis is the most widespread coniferous plantation species in Northeast China, ranking first in both area and stocking volume [22]. However, its slow litter decomposition can lead to soil acidification and a decrease in soil fertility, creating typical “green deserts” [23]. Compared with pure stands, mixed stands with broadleaf species can significantly mitigate these adverse effects [24,25], contributing to improved soil fertility [26,27]. Nevertheless, systematic research on how the rhizosphere SMC of L. olgensis responds to changes in stand composition and the underlying microbial mechanisms is still lacking. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of mixing L. olgensis with broadleaf species on the SMC in L. olgensis rhizosphere soil and to elucidate the potential microbial mechanisms involved. We propose the following hypotheses: (1) Tree species mixing increases the SMC in L. olgensis rhizosphere soil, and (2) this increase stems primarily from changes in soil microbial diversity, reflecting the fundamental role of soil microbial communities in regulating nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems [28]. In this study, we focus on how L. olgensis in mixed stands affects rhizosphere SMC to cope with resource-competition pressure, and we aim to elucidate the dynamic regulatory mechanisms through which microbial alpha diversity, community assembly processes, and microbial interaction networks influence SMC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

This study was conducted in the protective forest area of the Yongqing Forest Farm (25°33′ N, 116°18′ E), with a mean elevation of 779 m. Meteorological data from 2001 to 2023 were obtained from a nearby weather station via the China Meteorological Data Network (http://data.cma.cn, accessed on 3 April 2025). Analysis revealed that the region’s mean annual temperature over the past two decades (2001–2023) was 3.4 °C, with an average annual precipitation of 867 mm, characterizing a temperate semihumid monsoon climate with distinct seasons: dry and windy springs, warm, humid summers with concentrated rainfall, rapid temperature decreases and frequent early frosts in autumn, and long, cold, dry winters. The vegetation is predominantly composed of tree species such as Larix olgensis, Pinus koraiensis, and Fraxinus mandshurica. Understorey shrubs and herbs include Syringa reticulata, Lonicera japonica, Philadelphus schrenkii, Euonymus alatus, Sambucus williamsii, and Rhamnus davurica. The primary soil type is dark brown forest soil.
Two-year-old Larix olgensis seedlings were planted in the spring of 1990 and 2001 at the Yongqing Experimental Forest Farm to establish two stand types: a pure L. olgensis plantation (P) and a mixed plantation of L. olgensis and Fraxinus mandshurica (M). The planting spacing was 1.5 m × 1.5 m, and the plants were arranged in a single row. The stands underwent five tending operations over three years. The site conditions for both forests were comparable, with average slopes of 2° and 3°, respectively.

2.2. Vegetation Survey and Soil Sampling

In September 2021, employing a stratified randomized complete block design within the context of the National Forest Conservation Program, we selected protective forest plots (PF-20 and PF-31) established in different years (1990 and 2001) but with similar soil conditions to form a restoration chrono sequence. The experiment followed a complete factorial design: 2 (plantation ages) × 2 (stand types) × 6 (replicates). For each treatment combination, six plots (20 × 20 m) were randomly established, with adjacent quadrats spaced ≥200 m apart to minimize edge effects, resulting in a total of 24 plots. We measured the tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH) of Larix olgensis in both pure and mixed plantations (Table S1).
From each plot, six representatives of Larix olgensis were selected for rhizosphere soil collection. Briefly, live roots were carefully excavated from the topsoil (0–20 cm) and gently shaken by hand. Soil that adhered tightly to the roots (approximately 4 mm thick) was defined as rhizosphere soil [29]. The samples from the six trees per plot were composited into one representative sample per plot. Upon transport to the laboratory, each composite sample was divided into three parts. One part was stored at −80 °C for molecular analysis (qPCR and high-throughput sequencing), the second part was stored at 4 °C for the analysis of available nutrients, and the final part was air-dried, sieved, and used for pH measurement and the assessment of soil organic carbon, available potassium, total nitrogen and total phosphorus.

2.3. Soil Physicochemical Analyses and Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling

We determined soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), and soil water content (SWC) using standard methods [30,31,32]. Detailed methods for determining soil properties are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
The SMC index, representing multiple nutrient-supply capacities, was calculated using an averaging approach-a straightforward and interpretable method for quantifying multifunctionality [31,33]. Following Jing et al. (2015) and Jiao et al. (2018), SOC, NO3−-N, NH4+-N, TN, TP, AP, and AK values were standardized by Z-score transformation and then averaged to obtain an SMC index for each sample [5,31]. Differences in soil physicochemical properties and SMC between the two plantation types and between the two plantation ages were evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test in R (version 4.3.1). Bacterial and fungal α-diversity indices (including Shannon, Pielou, and Chao1) and β-diversity based on Bray–Curtis distances were assessed using the “vegan” package (version 2.7-2). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed with the Adonis function in vegan, with significance evaluated through 999 permutations, to determine differences in rhizosphere microbial communities of Larix plantations across different stand types. Following these analyses, a random forest (RF) model was applied to evaluate the contributions of microbial parameters to soil multi-nutrient cycling (SMC), using the “rfPermute” package (version 2.5). In addition, the analytical procedures for microbial assembly processes, bacterial–fungal cross-kingdom network construction, and the RF and SEM pathway models are described in detail in the Supplementary Materials.

2.4. Sequence Analysis

Rhizosphere soil DNA was extracted from homogenized soil samples (0.5 g) via a FastDNATM SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA concentration and purity were assessed with a NanoDrop 2000 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA were assessed via a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel [34]. The V 3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified via the primers 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT). The ITS1 region of the fungal gene was amplified using specific primer pairs (i.e., ITS1–1F-F: 5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′; ITS1-1F-R: 5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′. The amplicons were subsequently merged and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in equimolar amounts via paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) following the standard protocols provided by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME), which includes quality control, taxonomic assignment, and the generation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) for bacteria, was utilized [35,36]. Chimeric, single-OTU, and low-quality sequences were excluded manually. OTUs were differentiated at a similarity threshold of 97% via USEARCH and subsequently clustered with UPARSE [37]. The bacterial 16S rRNA sequences were compared with those in the SILVA database (version 138.1, http://www.arb-silva.de/, accessed on 8 May 2025) to assign a taxonomic classification. The resulting OTUs were subjected to comprehensive statistical analysis of the biological data to determine the response of the soil microbes to afforestation. The soil microbial alpha (α) diversity was represented by the Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson indices in QIIME 2 software  (version 2024.10) [38].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 for Windows. The choice of statistical tests was guided by the data structure and underlying assumptions. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to assess the statistical significance of the effects of mixing (stand type), tree species, and their interaction on soil chemical properties and other variables. The links between soil physicochemical properties, microbiome variables, single soil properties, and SMC were evaluated via ordinary least squares (OLS). Prior to performing two-way ANOVA and OLS regression, the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. All analyses met or approximately met the fundamental assumptions of the parametric tests. For all OLS models, we inspected residual normality (Shapiro–Wilk test and Q-Q plots), homoscedasticity (residuals vs. fitted values), and multicollinearity among predictors using variance inflation factors (VIF), and predictors with VIF > 5 were not included in the same model. When a significant interaction between the mixing effect and tree species effect was detected, differences between the two forest types were further analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Relationships between soil properties and microbial properties were examined using Pearson’s correlation analysis. Statistical significance was accepted at a level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Changes in Rhizosphere Soil Properties and SMC

Tree species mixing significantly affected the contents of NH4+, NO3−, total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available potassium (AK), available phosphorus (AP), soil organic carbon (SOC), and soil pH in the L. olgensis rhizosphere soil (Table S2, Figure S1). Stand age also significantly influenced the contents of NH4+, NO3−, TN, AK, AP, and SOC. Overall, compared with the pure plantation (P), the mixed plantation (M) experienced significant (p < 0.05) or highly significant (p < 0.01) increases in the contents of NH4+, TN, TP, AK, AP, and SOC, while the pH and NO3− concentration were significantly lower (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Significant interactive effects of stand age and mixing were observed for SOC, TN, AK, AP, NO3−, and NH4+ in the L. olgensis rhizosphere soil (p < 0.05) (Figure S1). Furthermore, the SMC index was significantly greater in M (0.43) than in P (−0.51) (p < 0.01; Figure 1a,b). Further correlation analysis and ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression were employed to quantify the relationships between SWC, pH and individual nutrient cycles (Figure S2), as well as the relationships between the SMC index and SWC and pH (Figure 1c,d). Across all the stands, SMC was significantly and positively correlated with both pH (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.001; Figure 1c) and SWC (R2 = 0.56, p < 0.001; Figure 1d).

3.2. Changes in Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Diversity and Composition

Following tree species mixing, the relative abundances of r-strategist bacterial taxa, such as Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidota, in the L. olgensis rhizosphere increased by 27.39%, 7.73%, and 92.3%, respectively. In contrast, the relative abundances of K-strategist bacterial taxa, such as Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi, decreased by 10.30% and 17.54%, respectively (Figure 2a,b). At the genus level, the relative abundances of Bryobacter (P: 7.47%, M: 15.83%), Bradyrhizobium (P: 5.61%, M: 11.37%), and Faecalibacterium (P: 2.61%, M: 5.37%) were significantly greater in the mixed plantation than in the pure plantation (Figure 2c,d).
Within the fungal community, the dominant phyla were Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota. The relative abundance of Basidiomycota was lower in the mixed plantation (M: 40.03%) than in the pure plantation (P: 50.45%) (Figure 3a,b). Analysis at the genus level revealed that the relative abundances of Russula (P: 7.37%, M: 13.01%), Mortierella (P: 4.18%, M: 10.83%), and Saitozyma (P: 5.01%, M: 7.43%) were significantly greater in the mixed plantation, whereas the relative abundances of Inocybe (P: 12.34%, M: 5.14%) and Clavulicium (P: 2.41%, M: 0.24%) were greater in the pure plantation (Figure 3c,d). The relative abundance of Solicoccozyma was also significantly different between the stand types (P: 5.03%, M: 2.17%).
Diversity analysis revealed that the alpha diversity indices (Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indices) of both the bacterial and fungal communities in the L. olgensis rhizosphere were significantly greater in the mixed plantation than in the pure plantation (Figure 4a,b). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distances indicated clear separations between the bacterial and fungal communities of the pure (P) and mixed (M) plantations (p < 0.05) (Figure 4c,d). The PCoA results revealed that compared with bacterial communities, fungal communities explained a greater proportion of the variation between pure and mixed plantations (R2 = 73.7%, p = 0.004) (R2 = 58.3%, p = 0.013).

3.3. Changes in the Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Cross-Kingdom Network and Assembly Process

In the L. olgensis rhizosphere soil, positive correlations between bacteria and fungi predominated in the cross-kingdom network (Figure 5a). The proportions of positive associations for M and P were 73% and 61%, respectively. Similarly, the number of bacterial nodes increased markedly by 40.1%, substantially exceeding the 6.1% increase observed for fungal nodes. Tree species mixing significantly increased network topological properties, including the number of nodes, average path length, average degree, clustering coefficient, and modularity (p < 0.05). Specifically, the average degree increased by 69.4%, the modularity increased by 59.2%, and the clustering coefficient increased by 35.3%, whereas the average path length decreased by 36.7% (Figure S3). Furthermore, both positive and negative cohesiveness were significantly greater in the M network than in the P network (p < 0.01) (Figure 5b), indicating greater robustness of the M network. Natural connectivity analysis demonstrated that the M network maintained higher connectivity as nodes were progressively removed (Figure 5c). On the basis of within-module connectivity (Zi) and among-module connectivity (Pi), 24 keystone taxa crucial to network structure were identified, including 7 module hubs and 6 connectors for bacteria and 4 module hubs and 7 connectors for fungi (Figure S4).
We utilized the beta nearest taxon index (βNTI) and the Bray–Crick-based Raup–Crick metric (RCBray) to infer the assembly processes of bacterial and fungal communities in the L. olgensis rhizosphere of pure and mixed plantations. The results indicated that stochastic processes primarily governed the assembly of L. olgensis rhizosphere microbial communities (|βNTI| < 2), with homogenizing dispersal and dispersal limitation being particularly influential (Figure 6a,b). With respect to bacteria, dispersal limitation in P (69.0%) exceeded that in M (54.7%), and a similar pattern was observed for fungi, with P (73.9%) being higher than M (55.6%) (Figure 6a,b). The proportion of community assembly controlled by stochastic processes was lower in P (83% for bacteria, 76% for fungi) than in M (95% for bacteria, 87% for fungi) (Figure 6c). Additionally, the modified stochasticity ratio (MST) analysis revealed that the contribution of stochastic processes was greater in M (bacteria: 83%, fungi: 67%) than in P (bacteria: 70%, fungi: 58%) (MST > 0.5) (Figure 6d), further indicating a greater influence of stochastic processes in the mixed plantation.
The Sloan neutral community model (NCM) revealed that the relative contribution of stochastic processes to bacterial community assembly was 50.7% in P and 71.9% in M (Figure S5a–d). With respect to the fungal communities, the stochastic contribution was 36.7% in P and 49.6% in M. The estimated migration rates (m) were higher in M (bacteria: 1.232; fungi: 0.3373) than in P (bacteria: 0.95334; fungi: 0.1945), suggesting stronger microbial dispersal potential in the mixed plantation. Furthermore, the higher goodness-of-fit (R2) of the NCM in M (bacteria: 0.719; fungi: 0.496) than in P (bacteria: 0.507; fungi: 0.367) indicated a greater influence of stochastic processes on microbial community assembly in the mixed plantation.

3.4. Influence of Rhizosphere Microbial Properties on SMC

Random forest analysis was used to assess the predictive power of microbial properties for SMC. The diversity indices of both the bacterial and fungal communities in the mixed plantation rhizosphere explained the most SMC variation, followed by network complexity and bacterial assembly processes (Figure 7). The relationships between the soil microbiome (i.e., the α diversity of bacteria and fungi, bacterial assembly and network complexity) and SMC (Figure 8) were further evaluated via correlation analyses and OLS. In the stand, SMC was significantly and positively associated with bacterial α-diversity (Chao1, R2 = 0.59; Shannon, R2 = 0.68; Simpson, R2 = 0.61; Figure 8) and fungal α-diversity (Shannon, R2 = 0.30; Simpson, R2 = 0.50; Figure 8) and was also significantly positively linked to bacterial assembly processes (R2 = 0.51; Figure 8). Similarly, SMC was significantly correlated with network complexity (negative associations: R2 = 0.43; positive associations: R2 = 0.36; Figure 8). Moreover, pH and SWC were both strongly and positively correlated with bacterial α-diversity (p < 0.001; Figures S6 and S7). The pH showed a highly significant positive relationship with fungal α-diversity, bacterial assembly processes, and positive associations (p < 0.001; Figure S6), but was significantly negatively correlated with negative associations (p < 0.001; Figure S6).
We constructed structural equation models (SEMs) separately for fungi and bacteria to elucidate the regulatory relationships among these factors (Figure 9a,b). The final model explained 41% of the variation in SMC. The forest type had an indirect positive effect on SMC by directly enhancing the soil properties, bacterial assembly process, network complexity, bacterial diversity, and fungal diversity, with a standardized total effect (STE) of 1.52 according to the SEM (Figure 9a,b). Specifically, the direct positive effects on SMC were attributed to soil properties (STE = 0.19), bacterial diversity (STE = 0.66) and fungal diversity (STE = 0.33). Analysis of the relationships between network complexity, bacterial assembly processes, and SMC under the influence of stand type and soil properties (Figure 9a,b) indicated that bacterial assembly processes (STE = 0.21) and network complexity (STE = 0.54) positively affected SMC. Notably, microbial diversity positively influenced SMC indirectly by driving network complexity (Figure 9a,b). In summary, among the various drivers evaluated, microbial diversity emerged as the most significant contributor to SMC (Figure 9a,b).

4. Discussion

4.1. Microbial Diversity in the Rhizosphere Soil

Soil microbial communities are central to decomposition, nutrient cycling, and the maintenance of soil health, yet their contributions vary strongly across environmental contexts [39]. Tree species mixing significantly altered the composition of the rhizosphere microbial community in L. olgensis (Figure 3 and Figure 4) and substantially increased the microbial α diversity (p < 0.01; Figure 5), thereby supporting our first hypothesis. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies showing that changes in tree species composition can influence microbial community structure by altering key soil properties, such as pH and SWC [40,41]. This study further demonstrated that tree species mixing significantly affects microbial community composition by altering rhizosphere soil properties (notably soil moisture and pH) in the rhizosphere of L. olgensis, although its effects on bacterial and fungal diversity differ substantially (Figures S6 and S7). Specifically, increases in soil pH were associated with significant increases in both bacterial and fungal diversity, whereas higher SWC was associated only with increased bacterial diversity and had no significant effect on fungal diversity (Figures S6 and S7). Previous studies have reported that increasing soil pH from acidic (pH < 5.0) to near-neutral (pH 6.0–7.0) significantly increases the species richness of both bacteria and fungi [42]. In contrast, the effects of soil water content on bacterial and fungal diversity differ markedly. Bacterial α diversity is highly sensitive to SWC, whereas fungal diversity responds weaklier (Figure S7). This divergence may be due to the distinct physiological adaptation strategies of bacteria and fungi. Bacteria largely depend on thin water films in soil for nutrient diffusion, rendering their activity highly sensitive to SWC [43]. In contrast, through extensive hyphal networks, fungi can translocate water and nutrients across micro-environments [44]. This structural advantage may confer greater resilience of fungi to water content variation, such that fungal community diversity is more strongly influenced by other factors, such as soil pH [45]. Furthermore, bacterial diversity contributed the most to the increase in the SMC, followed by fungal diversity, as supported by the SEM results (Figure 8), which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [42]. This research highlights that a mixture of tree species promotes microbial diversity through SWC and pH in L. olgensis rhizosphere soil, which subsequently influences the SMC.

4.2. Rhizosphere Bacteria–Fungi Kingdom Network and Assembly Processes

The assembly of microbial communities is typically governed by the combined effects of deterministic processes (e.g., environmental filtering and species interactions) and stochastic processes (e.g., dispersal limitation and ecological drift) [46]. This can result in more diverse and dynamic microbial communities capable of adapting to varying environmental conditions [47]. Our study revealed that stochastic processes dominated the assembly of the L. olgensis rhizosphere microbial communities, with their influence being significantly stronger in the mixed plantation than in the pure plantation (Figure 6). This aligns with findings in Chinese fir plantations, suggesting that tree species mixing reduces environmental filtering and increases the influence of stochasticity [48]. The enhanced role of stochasticity following mixing may be linked to elevated rhizosphere nutrient levels (Figure 1). Improvements in rhizosphere soil properties in mixed stands (e.g., soil water content and pH) can increase soil nutrient availability (Figure S2), resulting in the supply of microbes with a more diverse resource base, substantially broadening the width of the habitat niche and thereby weakening environmental filtering [49]. Furthermore, microbial morphological traits can serve as important indicators of dispersal ability [50]. Consistent with the ‘size-plasticity’ and ‘size-dispersal’ hypotheses, fungi are more susceptible to dispersal limitation than bacteria are [51]. Similarly, we found that compared with bacterial communities, fungal communities in the L. olgensis rhizosphere were subjected to stronger dispersal limitations (Figure 6). Tree species mixing alleviated dispersal limitation for bacteria (Figure S5), potentially related to the theory of niche preemption, where populations with higher fitness are more likely to successfully colonize and exhibit increased dispersal ability [50]. From a functional perspective, stochastically assembled communities can buffer environmental disturbances through mechanisms such as metabolic redundancy and functional complementary [52], thereby enhancing ecosystem functioning. Notably, our study revealed a link between bacterial assembly processes and SMC (Figure 9), suggesting that the increased stochasticity of bacteria across habitats enhances their functional contribution to the community, highlighting the critical role of bacterial assembly mechanisms in maintaining terrestrial soil nutrient cycling.
Microbial co-occurrence networks play a vital role in maintaining community stability; however, these networks have received insufficient attention in studies on tree species mixing. A recent study on mixed eucalyptus plantations revealed that mixing significantly increased the complexity of cross-domain fungal and bacterial networks [53]. Our findings further support this conclusion, demonstrating that the microbial network in the L. olgensis rhizosphere of the mixed plantation contained more nodes and edges (Figure S3) and was therefore more complex and stable than that in the pure plantation. Concurrently, tree species mixing was associated with a higher proportion of positive correlations and reduced network vulnerability, indicating altered patterns of microbial co-occurrence within the bacteria–fungi cross-domain network (Figure 5). These patterns may be indirectly related to increased carbon inputs from L. olgensis roots under mixed plantations [54], which can modify rhizosphere nutrient availability and potentially promote more frequent microbial interactions [55]. Notably, we found that the cross-domain bacterial–fungal network in the mixed plantation was significantly correlated with SMC (Figure 9), a phenomenon also reported in other ecosystems [6,42]. On the one hand, higher network complexity is commonly interpreted as reflecting tighter microbial associations and greater structural organization, which may be linked to enhanced resource turnover and nutrient cycling efficiency at the community level [20,56]. On the other hand, complex networks are generally considered less vulnerable to external disturbances due to their higher degree of inter-connectivity [19,42]. Therefore, in-depth investigations of the dynamics of microbial interaction networks and their contributions to maintaining soil health remain central topics in research on plantation ecosystem restoration.

4.3. Key Drivers of Rhizosphere SMC

In this study, microbial diversity emerged as the primary predictor of SMC, with greater explanatory power than stand type, soil properties, or network complexity did (Figure 9). Specifically, microbial diversity maintained a significant positive relationship with SMC (Figure 9), which persisted when multiple predictors were considered simultaneously (Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9), thereby confirming our second hypothesis. As a crucial regulator of SMC, soil microbial diversity is modulated by nutrient availability and microenvironmental conditions [57], whereas increased tree species richness promotes soil heterogeneity and consequently sustains soil biodiversity [1]. Furthermore, higher microbial diversity facilitates richer metabolic capabilities, strengthens microbial interactions (e.g., cross-feeding), and improves nutrient cycling efficiency [58], collectively optimizing soil nutrient availability. Notably, microbial diversity also indirectly promoted SMC by enhancing network complexity (Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9), indicating that network complexity reinforces the microbial diversity-SMC relationship. Previous studies have established network complexity as a critical dimension for predicting ecosystem functioning [19,20,59]. Thus, increased microbial diversity fosters stronger ecological connections among microbial taxa, yielding more complex network architectures that subsequently increase SMC. However, when stand composition, soil properties, and microbial diversity were considered together, network complexity had no significant direct effect on SMC (Figure 9), suggesting that its influence is strongly mediated by stand characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, and microbial diversity. Additionally, deterministic processes may dampen the effects of microbial diversity on SMC through dilution effects [60], and the predominant stochastic assembly of bacterial communities in our study mitigated such dilution (Figure 6) and strengthened the relationships between the microbial community and SMC (Figure 9). Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of microbial network complexity and assembly processes in sustaining SMC, advancing our understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem functional relationships in multi-nutrient contexts, with implications for soil health assessment, biodiversity conservation, and maintenance of multi-functionality in managed forest ecosystems. Consequently, future studies should focus on plant–soil microbe interactions across trophic levels to elucidate the integrated microbial mechanisms driving SMC, thereby facilitating comprehensive soil nutrient management in forest ecosystems.
In summary, our findings demonstrate that tree species mixing enhances soil multi-nutrient cycling (SMC) primarily by promoting more complex microbial networks and increasing the stochasticity of community assembly. These results elucidate key microbial mechanisms through which mixed-species plantations sustain multiple ecological functions and provide a mechanistic basis for managing soil health and biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Nevertheless, the temporal and spatial scope of this study imposes certain limitations. Future research should therefore incorporate long-term and multi-season monitoring to capture temporal dynamics, expand across broader spatial gradients to test the generality and context dependency of tree species mixing effects, and account for land-use history and legacy effects. Moreover, integrating observational studies with controlled experiments across diverse conifer–broadleaf species combinations, together with functional approaches such as metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, isotopic tracing, and enzyme activity profiling, will further strengthen causal inference and elucidate the mechanistic links between microbial diversity, functional potential, and soil multi-nutrient cycling.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that mixed planting with broadleaf species in L. olgensis stands enhances SMC through modifications to soil properties, microbiome characteristics (diversity, network complexity, and assembly processes) and their interrelationships. Compared with pure stands, mixed stands promoted r-strategist microbial communities, increased diversity, enhanced stochastic assembly, and developed more complex microbial networks. Our analyses revealed consistent positive associations between SMC and improvements in soil properties, bacterial and fungal diversity, stochastic processes, and microbial network complexity. Specifically, microbial diversity, assembly processes, and soil properties were identified as direct drivers of SMC in L. olgensis forests. Importantly, tree species mixing enhanced SMC by modulating soil–microbial community interactions and indirectly through microbial diversity-mediated increases in network complexity. These findings collectively emphasize the ecological advantages of mixed conifer–broadleaf forests from microbial diversity, assembly, and network perspectives while underscoring their significance for enhancing soil microbial functionality. Furthermore, this study contributes to our understanding of how multispecies afforestation enhances forest ecosystem services through improved soil nutrient cycling.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms14020388/s1, Table S1: Stand characteristics of pure and mixed plantations in this study; Table S2: Rhizosphere soil chemical properties of L. olgensis in pure and mixed plantations; Figure S1: Rhizosphere soil properties of L. olgensis in pure and mixed stands in temperate China; Figure S2: Relationships between soil water content (a) and pH (b) and SMC; Figure S3: Parameters in bacterial–fungal co-occurrence; Figure S4: Zi-Pi diagrams of bacteria and fungi based on the topological role of OTUs; Figure S5: The fit of the neutral community model (NCM) of bacterial (a,b) and Fungal (c,d) community assembly; Figure S6: Links between soil pH and soil microbial attributes; Figure S7: Links between soil water content and soil microbial attributes. References [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Y.L.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, data curation and writing—original draft. Y.Y. and B.Y.: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. W.F. and C.J.: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology. F.W.: Formal analysis. J.W.: Investigation, Validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD2201002-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to containing unpublished research findings that are part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shi, X.; Wang, J.; Lucas-Borja, M.E.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Huang, Z. Microbial diversity regulates ecosystem multifunctionality during natural secondary succession. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 58, 2833–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Gómez-González, S.; Paniw, M.; Blanco-Pastor, J.L.; García-Cervigón, A.I.; Godoy, O.; Herrera, J.M.; Lara, A.; Miranda, A.; Ojeda, F.; Ochoa-Hueso, R. Moving towards the ecological intensification of tree plantations. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Hua, F.; Bruijnzeel, L.A.; Meli, P.; Martin, P.A.; Zhang, J.; Nakagawa, S.; Miao, X.; Wang, W.; McEvoy, C.; Peña-Arancibia, J.L.; et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science 2022, 376, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Bristow, M.; Vanclay, J.K.; Brooks, L.; Hunt, M. Growth and species interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a mixed and monoculture plantation in the humid tropics of north Queensland. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 233, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Jiao, S.; Peng, Z.; Qi, J.; Gao, J.; Wei, G. Linking Bacterial-Fungal Relationships to Microbial Diversity and Soil Nutrient Cycling. mSystems 2021, 6, e01052-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Pan, C.; Sun, C.; Yu, W.; Guo, J.; Yu, Y.; Li, X. Mixed planting enhances soil multi-nutrient cycling by homogenizing microbial communities across soil vertical scale. Land Degrad. Dev. 2023, 34, 1477–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Mason-Jones, K.; Robinson, S.L.; Veen, G.F.; Manzoni, S.; van der Putten, W.H. Microbial storage and its implications for soil ecology. ISME J. 2022, 16, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Mori, A.S.; Isbell, F.; Fujii, S.; Makoto, K.; Matsuoka, S.; Osono, T. Low multifunctional redundancy of soil fungal diversity at multiple scales. Ecol. Lett. 2016, 19, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Bai, Y.; Wei, H.; Ming, A.; Shu, W.; Shen, W. Tree species mixing begets admixture of soil microbial communities: Variations along bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and root tissue. Geoderma 2023, 438, 116638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Tang, J. Litter application increases soil multinutrient cycling in alpine meadow ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 202, 105566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Jiao, S.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Du, N.; Li, Q.; Wei, G. Soil microbiomes with distinct assemblies through vertical soil profiles drive the cycling of multiple nutrients in reforested ecosystems. Microbiome 2018, 6, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Dai, W.; Liu, Y.; Yao, D.; Wang, N.; Shao, J.; Ye, X.; Cui, Z.; Zong, H.; Tian, L.; Chen, X.; et al. Biogeographic distribution, assembly processes and potential nutrient cycling functions of myxobacteria communities in typical agricultural soils in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, W.; Hall, S.J.; Hu, H.; Dutta, S.; Miao, Q.; Wang, J.; Kang, H. Chronic nitrogen deposition drives microbial community change and disrupts bacterial-fungal interactions along a subtropical urbanization gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 169, 108676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Zhang, K.; Shi, Y.; Lu, H.; He, M.; Huang, W.; Siemann, E. Soil bacterial communities and co-occurrence changes associated with multi-nutrient cycling under rice-wheat rotation reclamation in coastal wetland. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Li, W.Q.; Wu, Z.J.; Zong, Y.Y.; Wang, G.G.; Chen, F.S.; Liu, Y.Q.; Li, J.J.; Fang, X.M. Tree species mixing enhances rhizosphere soil organic carbon mineralization of conifers in subtropical plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 516, 120238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Xun, W.; Li, W.; Xiong, W.; Ren, Y.; Liu, Y.; Miao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, N.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Diversity-triggered deterministic bacterial assembly constrains community functions. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Cheng, W.H.; Hsieh, C.H.; Chang, C.W.; Shiah, F.K.; Miki, T. New index of functional specificity to predict the redundancy of ecosystem functions in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2022, 98, fiac058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Xu, C.; Chang, Y.; Penuelas, J.; Sardans, J.; Cheng, D.; Li, B.; Zhong, Q. Mixing Machilus pauhoi with Cerasus campanulata improves soil P availability and changes the soil G+/G- in a mid-subtropical region of China. Plant Soil 2023, 486, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Yang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Chao, X.; Liu, H.; Ba, S. Distribution patterns and community assembly processes of eukaryotic microorganisms along an altitudinal gradient in the middle reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River. Water Res. 2023, 239, 120047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Meng, Z.; Xu, R.; Duoji, D.; Zhang, J.; He, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; et al. Soil microbial network complexity predicts ecosystem function along elevation gradients on the Tibetan Plateau. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 172, 108766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Liu, B.; Liu, Q.; Daryanto, S.; Guo, S.; Huang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Ma, X. Responses of Chinese fir and Schima superba seedlings to light gradients: Implications for the restoration of mixed broadleaf-conifer forests from Chinese fir monocultures. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 419–420, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Yu, J.; Liu, Q. Larix olgensis growth–climate response between lower and upper elevation limits: An intensive study along the eastern slope of the Changbai Mountains, northeastern China. J. For. Res. 2020, 31, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Liu, X.; Duan, G.; Chhin, S.; Lei, X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X. Evaluation of potential versus realized site productivity of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations across northern China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 479, 118608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Chauvat, M.; Titsch, D.; Zaytsev, A.S.; Wolters, V. Changes in soil faunal assemblages during conversion from pure to mixed forest stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Liu, C.L.C.; Kuchma, O.; Krutovsky, K.V. Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018, 15, e00419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Huang, Y.; Wang, S.L.; Feng, Z.W.; Ouyang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.K.; Feng, Z.Z. Changes in soil quality due to introduction of broad-leaf trees into clear-felled Chinese fir forest in the mid-subtropics of China. Soil Use Manag. 2004, 20, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Li, H.; Chen, Y.S.; Yu, G.; Rossi, F.; Huo, D.; De Philippis, R.; Cheng, X.; Wang, W.; Li, R. Multiple diversity facets of crucial microbial groups in biological soil crusts promote soil multifunctionality. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. 2021, 30, 1204–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Yang, F.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Long, C.; Jia, W.; Cheng, X. Keystone species affect the relationship between soil microbial diversity and ecosystem function under land use change in subtropical China. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Fang, K.; Kou, Y.-P.; Tang, N.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.-Y.; He, H.-L.; Xia, R.-X.; Zhao, W.-Q.; Li, D.-D.; Liu, Q. Differential responses of soil bacteria, fungi and protists to root exudates and temperature. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 286, 127829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Brookes, P.C.; Powlson, D.S.; Jenkinson, D.S. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1982, 14, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Jing, X.; Sanders, N.J.; Shi, Y.; Chu, H.; Classen, A.T.; Zhao, K.; Chen, L.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, Y.; He, J.-S. The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above- and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Wang, Z.; Lu, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Luo, C.; Zhao, Y. Resorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium from leaves of lucerne stands of different ages. Plant Soil 2014, 383, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Byrnes, J.E.K.; Gamfeldt, L.; Isbell, F.; Lefcheck, J.S.; Griffin, J.N.; Hector, A.; Cardinale, B.J.; Hooper, D.U.; Dee, L.E.; Emmett Duffy, J. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Ji, L.; Shen, F.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Purahong, W.; Yang, L. Contrasting altitudinal patterns and co-occurrence networks of soil bacterial and fungal communities along soil depths in the cold-temperate montane forests of China. CATENA 2022, 209, 105844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Cheng, H.; Yuan, M.; Tang, L.; Shen, Y.; Yu, Q.; Li, S. Integrated microbiology and metabolomics analysis reveal responses of soil microorganisms and metabolic functions to phosphorus fertilizer on semiarid farm. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 817, 152878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Edgar, R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Lan, Y.; Zhang, H.; He, Y.; Jiang, C.; Yang, M.; Ye, S. Legume-bacteria-soil interaction networks linked to improved plant productivity and soil fertility in intercropping systems. Ind. Crop Prod. 2023, 196, 116504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Rakotonindrina, V.; Andriamananjara, A.; Razafimbelo, T.; Okamoto, T.; Sarr, P.S. Land Cover and Seasonal Variations Shape Soil Microbial Communities and Nutrient Cycling in Madagascar Tropical Forests. Microb. Ecol. 2025, 88, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Mi, J.; Wang, F.; Shi, J.; Wang, Q.; Pang, H.; Yu, J.; Chen, D.; Bai, Y. Contrasting Trends in Plant Diversity and Soil Carbon Mineralization Under Precipitation-Driven Vegetation and Soil Carbon Dynamics in the Mongolian Plateau. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e71806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Ruan, Y.; Ling, N.; Jiang, S.; Jing, X.; He, J.-S.; Shen, Q.; Nan, Z. Warming and altered precipitation independently and interactively suppress alpine soil microbial growth in a decadal-long experiment. eLife 2024, 12, RP89392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Y.; Chi, J.; Lu, X.; Cai, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K. Fungal-bacterial composition and network complexity determine soil multifunctionality during ecological restoration. CATENA 2023, 230, 107251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Yu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, C. The Diversity and Function of Soil Bacteria and Fungi Under Altered Nitrogen and Rainfall Patterns in a Temperate Steppe. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Wang, X.B.; Azarbad, H.; Leclerc, L.; Dozois, J.; Mukula, E.; Yergeau, É. A Drying-Rewetting Cycle Imposes More Important Shifts on Soil Microbial Communities than Does Reduced Precipitation. mSystems 2022, 7, e0024722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Guo, Z.; Huang, X.; Li, C.; Ma, S.; Yang, N.; Li, H.; Zhang, T.; Wang, T.; Li, S.; Su, J. Altitudinal influences on soil microbial diversity: The pivotal role of plant functional composition in shaping bacterial and fungal communities. For. Ecol. Manag. 2025, 586, 122728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Zhou, J.; Ning, D. Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Dini-Andreote, F.; Stegen, J.C.; van Elsas, J.D.; Salles, J.F. Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E1326–E1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Ding, K.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Tong, Z. Soil bacterial community structure and functions but not assembly processes are affected by the conversion from monospecific Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations to mixed plantations. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 185, 104775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Shu, D.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, C.; Van Nostrand, J.D.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wei, G. Rare prokaryotic sub-communities dominate the complexity of ecological networks and soil multinutrient cycling during long-term secondary succession in China’s Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, W.; Jiao, S.; Li, Q.; Du, N. Dispersal limitation relative to environmental filtering governs the vertical small-scale assembly of soil microbiomes during restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 57, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Farjalla, V.F.; Srivastava, D.S.; Marino, N.A.C.; Azevedo, F.D.; Dib, V.; Lopes, P.M.; Rosado, A.S.; Bozelli, R.L.; Esteves, F.A. Ecological determinism increases with organism size. Ecology 2012, 93, 1752–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Chase, J.M. Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science 2010, 328, 1388–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. He, Y.; Wen, Y.; Li, K.; Ye, S.; Zhang, H.; He, F.; Fan, R.; Wu, H. Responses of soil multifunctionality, microbial diversity, and network complexity to tree species mixing in Eucalyptus plantations. Ind. Crop Prod. 2025, 225, 120575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Huang, Y.; Fu, S.; Wang, J.; Ming, A.; Li, X.; Yao, M.; Li, H. Tree species mixture inhibits soil organic carbon mineralization accompanied by decreased r-selected bacteria. Plant Soil 2018, 431, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Yuan, J.; Zhao, J.; Wen, T.; Zhao, M.; Li, R.; Goossens, P.; Huang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Vivanco, J.M.; Kowalchuk, G.A. Root exudates drive the soil-borne legacy of aboveground pathogen infection. Microbiome 2018, 6, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Wagg, C.; Schlaeppi, K.; Banerjee, S.; Kuramae, E.E.; van der Heijden, M.G.A. Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Fan, K.; Chu, H.; Eldridge, D.J.; Gaitan, J.J.; Liu, Y.-R.; Sokoya, B.; Wang, J.-T.; Hu, H.-W.; He, J.-Z.; Sun, W.; et al. Soil biodiversity supports the delivery of multiple ecosystem functions in urban greenspaces. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 7, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Wang, C.; Shi, Z.; Li, A.; Geng, T.; Liu, L.; Liu, W. Long-term nitrogen input reduces soil bacterial network complexity by shifts in life history strategy in temperate grassland. iMeta 2024, 3, e194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Xiao, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, B.; Fan, B.; Zhou, G. Soil microbial network complexity predicts soil multifunctionality better than soil microbial diversity during grassland-farmland-shrubland conversion on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2025, 379, 109356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Knelman, J.E.; Nemergut, D.R. Changes in community assembly may shift the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Nelson, D.W.; Sommers, L.E. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2; Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1982; pp. 539–580. [Google Scholar]
  62. Olesen, J.M.; Bascompte, J.; Dupont, Y.L.; Jordano, P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19891–19896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Stegen, J.C.; Lin, X.; Konopka, A.E.; Fredrickson, J.K. Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1653–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Vilmi, A.; Gibert, C.; Escarguel, G.; Happonen, K.; Heino, J.; Jamoneau, A.; Passy, S.I.; Picazo, F.; Soininen, J.; Tison-Rosebery, J.; et al. Dispersal–niche continuum index: A new quantitative metric for assessing the relative importance of dispersal versus niche processes in community assembly. Ecography 2020, 44, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Ning, D.; Deng, Y.; Tiedje, J.M.; Zhou, J. A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 16892–16898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Feng, K.; Peng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Gu, S.; He, Q.; Shen, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, D.; Hu, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. iNAP: An integrated network analysis pipeline for microbiome studies. iMeta 2022, 1, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; Yang, J.; Liao, J.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Ruan, H. Elevated CO2 shifts soil microbial communities from K- to r-strategists. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2021, 30, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Kim, H.; Lee, K.K.; Jeon, J.; Harris, W.A.; Lee, Y.-H. Domestication of Oryza species eco-evolutionarily shapes bacterial and fungal communities in rice seed. Microbiome 2020, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Csárdi, G.; Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Interjournal Complex Syst. 2006, 1695, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wu, J.; Barahona, M.; Tan, Y.; Deng, H. Robustness of Random Graphs Based on Natural Connectivity. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 2010, 42, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yuan, M.M.; Guo, X.; Wu, L.W.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, N.J.; Ning, D.L.; Shi, Z.J.; Zhou, X.S.; Wu, L.Y.; Yang, Y.F.; et al. Climate warming enhances microbial network complexity and stability. Nat. Clim. Change 2021, 11, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Hernandez, D.J.; David, A.S.; Menges, E.S.; Searcy, C.A.; Afkhami, M.E. Environmental stress destabilizes microbial networks. ISME J. 2021, 15, 1722–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  73. Sanchez, G.; Trinchera, L.; Russolillo, G. Plspm: Tools for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). R Package Version 0.4.9. 2013. Available online: https://gastonstat.r-universe.dev/plspm (accessed on 11 February 2025).
Figure 1. Soil multi-nutrient cycling among different L. olgensis plantations (a) and the relationships between soil multi-nutrient cycling and forest type (b), soil water content (c) and pH (d). Note: P, the L. olgensis in pure plantations; M, the L. olgensis in mixed plantations; 20: 20-year-old stands; 31: 31-year-old stands. Within each boxplot, the colors are used to distinguish the treatment conditions: yellow corresponds to the P and cyan corresponds to the M (a). ** exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.01 respectively.
Figure 1. Soil multi-nutrient cycling among different L. olgensis plantations (a) and the relationships between soil multi-nutrient cycling and forest type (b), soil water content (c) and pH (d). Note: P, the L. olgensis in pure plantations; M, the L. olgensis in mixed plantations; 20: 20-year-old stands; 31: 31-year-old stands. Within each boxplot, the colors are used to distinguish the treatment conditions: yellow corresponds to the P and cyan corresponds to the M (a). ** exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.01 respectively.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g001
Figure 2. Taxonomic dendrograms and Grouped Stacked Columns of the detected bacterial communities display the OTUs distribution. Each point represents the corresponding classification level. (a,b) Phylum-level taxonomic composition of bacterial communities in L. olgensis conifer rhizosphere soil in pure plantations (a) and mixed plantations (b). (c,d) Genus-level taxonomic composition of bacterial community in conifer rhizosphere soil of L. olgensis in pure plantations and mixed plantations: The top 11 genera in terms of relative abundance. P, the L. olgensis in pure plantations; M, the L. olgensis in mixed plantations; 20: 20-year-old stands; 31: 31-year-old stands; Same below.
Figure 2. Taxonomic dendrograms and Grouped Stacked Columns of the detected bacterial communities display the OTUs distribution. Each point represents the corresponding classification level. (a,b) Phylum-level taxonomic composition of bacterial communities in L. olgensis conifer rhizosphere soil in pure plantations (a) and mixed plantations (b). (c,d) Genus-level taxonomic composition of bacterial community in conifer rhizosphere soil of L. olgensis in pure plantations and mixed plantations: The top 11 genera in terms of relative abundance. P, the L. olgensis in pure plantations; M, the L. olgensis in mixed plantations; 20: 20-year-old stands; 31: 31-year-old stands; Same below.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g002
Figure 3. Taxonomic dendrograms and Grouped Stacked Columns of the detected fungal communities display the OTUs distribution. Each point represents the corresponding classification level. Note: (a,b) Phylum-level taxonomic composition of fungal communities in conifer rhizosphere soil in pure plantations (a) and mixed plantations (b). (c,d) Genus-level taxonomic composition of fungal community in conifer rhizosphere soil in pure plantations and mixed plantations: The top 11 genera in terms of relative abundance.
Figure 3. Taxonomic dendrograms and Grouped Stacked Columns of the detected fungal communities display the OTUs distribution. Each point represents the corresponding classification level. Note: (a,b) Phylum-level taxonomic composition of fungal communities in conifer rhizosphere soil in pure plantations (a) and mixed plantations (b). (c,d) Genus-level taxonomic composition of fungal community in conifer rhizosphere soil in pure plantations and mixed plantations: The top 11 genera in terms of relative abundance.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g003
Figure 4. Bacterial and fungal diversity and PCoA analysis of L. olgensis rhizosphere. Note: (a,b) represents Polar of Simpson, Chao and Shannon index. (a) Bacteria; (b) fungi. Different letters above the boxes indicate a significant difference. (c,d) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) for bacterial and fungal based on P and M.  In (c,d), Dashed lines indicate the approximate separation boundaries between sample groups based on the PCoA ordination.
Figure 4. Bacterial and fungal diversity and PCoA analysis of L. olgensis rhizosphere. Note: (a,b) represents Polar of Simpson, Chao and Shannon index. (a) Bacteria; (b) fungi. Different letters above the boxes indicate a significant difference. (c,d) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) for bacterial and fungal based on P and M.  In (c,d), Dashed lines indicate the approximate separation boundaries between sample groups based on the PCoA ordination.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g004
Figure 5. Bacterial–fungal co-occurrence networks based on all samples of L. olgensis rhizosphere soil in pure forest (left) and mixed forest (right). Note: (a) A connection stand represents a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between two OTUs. The size of each node is proportional to the number of connections. (b) Bacterial–fungal interdomain network cohesion was analyzed in both bulk soil and rhizosphere compartments. Positive cohesion values, derived from pairwise positive correlations, indicate the extent of microbial cooperation within the community. Different letters above the boxes indicate a significant difference. (c) Network stability was evaluated using natural connectivity metrics.
Figure 5. Bacterial–fungal co-occurrence networks based on all samples of L. olgensis rhizosphere soil in pure forest (left) and mixed forest (right). Note: (a) A connection stand represents a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between two OTUs. The size of each node is proportional to the number of connections. (b) Bacterial–fungal interdomain network cohesion was analyzed in both bulk soil and rhizosphere compartments. Positive cohesion values, derived from pairwise positive correlations, indicate the extent of microbial cooperation within the community. Different letters above the boxes indicate a significant difference. (c) Network stability was evaluated using natural connectivity metrics.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g005
Figure 6. The ecological processes of L. olgensis rhizosphere soil bacterial and fungal communities. Note: (a,b) Relative importance of five ecological processes in pure (P) and mixed (M) plantations, based on the beta nearest taxon index (βNTI) and Bray-Curtis-based Raup-Crick index (RCBray). (c) Phylogenetic turnover (βNTI) and the proportion of deterministic (|βNTI| > 2) versus stochastic (|βNTI| < 2) processes. (d) Modified stochasticity ratio (MST) of bacterial communities. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between P and M are indicated by different letters. *, ** and *** exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively.
Figure 6. The ecological processes of L. olgensis rhizosphere soil bacterial and fungal communities. Note: (a,b) Relative importance of five ecological processes in pure (P) and mixed (M) plantations, based on the beta nearest taxon index (βNTI) and Bray-Curtis-based Raup-Crick index (RCBray). (c) Phylogenetic turnover (βNTI) and the proportion of deterministic (|βNTI| > 2) versus stochastic (|βNTI| < 2) processes. (d) Modified stochasticity ratio (MST) of bacterial communities. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between P and M are indicated by different letters. *, ** and *** exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g006
Figure 7. Potential microbial community drivers of SMC in rhizosphere soil of L. olgensis. Note: The relative significance of each predictor was assessed by calculating the percentage increase in mean squared error (%lncMSE), with greater values indicating higher variable importance. The microbial predictors were designated with prefixes: “F_” representing fungal taxa and “B_” denoting bacterial taxa. Quantitative analysis of microbial biomass was performed through real-time PCR quantification, with data normalized by log10-transforming the gene copy numbers per gram of dry soil. * and ** exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 7. Potential microbial community drivers of SMC in rhizosphere soil of L. olgensis. Note: The relative significance of each predictor was assessed by calculating the percentage increase in mean squared error (%lncMSE), with greater values indicating higher variable importance. The microbial predictors were designated with prefixes: “F_” representing fungal taxa and “B_” denoting bacterial taxa. Quantitative analysis of microbial biomass was performed through real-time PCR quantification, with data normalized by log10-transforming the gene copy numbers per gram of dry soil. * and ** exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g007
Figure 8. The ordinary least-squares regression showing the links between SMC and microbial communities.
Figure 8. The ordinary least-squares regression showing the links between SMC and microbial communities.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g008
Figure 9. Main drivers of L. olgensis rhizosphere SMC and their action pathways. Note: Structural equation models (SEMs) accounting for the direct and indirect effects of forest type, soil properties, bacterial and fungal diversity, bacterial assembly processes and network complexity on SMC (a,b). The blue and orange arrows respectively represent positive and negative influences. The width of the arrow is related to the path coefficient. SWC, soil water content; SMC, soil multi-nutrient cycling, B-Assembly Processes, bacterial assembly processes, MSE, mean square error. R2 indicates the total variation in the dependent variable explained by all the independent variables. ** and ***  exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 9. Main drivers of L. olgensis rhizosphere SMC and their action pathways. Note: Structural equation models (SEMs) accounting for the direct and indirect effects of forest type, soil properties, bacterial and fungal diversity, bacterial assembly processes and network complexity on SMC (a,b). The blue and orange arrows respectively represent positive and negative influences. The width of the arrow is related to the path coefficient. SWC, soil water content; SMC, soil multi-nutrient cycling, B-Assembly Processes, bacterial assembly processes, MSE, mean square error. R2 indicates the total variation in the dependent variable explained by all the independent variables. ** and ***  exhibit significance at the levels of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively.
Microorganisms 14 00388 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Jiao, C.; Feng, W.; Yang, Y.; Yang, B.; Wang, F.; Wang, J. Tree Species Mixing Regulates Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling by Altering Microbial Network Complexity and Assembly Processes in Larix olgensis. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020388

AMA Style

Liu Y, Jiao C, Feng W, Yang Y, Yang B, Wang F, Wang J. Tree Species Mixing Regulates Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling by Altering Microbial Network Complexity and Assembly Processes in Larix olgensis. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(2):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yue, Chunjing Jiao, Wanju Feng, Yuchun Yang, Bing Yang, Fang Wang, and Jun Wang. 2026. "Tree Species Mixing Regulates Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling by Altering Microbial Network Complexity and Assembly Processes in Larix olgensis" Microorganisms 14, no. 2: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020388

APA Style

Liu, Y., Jiao, C., Feng, W., Yang, Y., Yang, B., Wang, F., & Wang, J. (2026). Tree Species Mixing Regulates Soil Multi-Nutrient Cycling by Altering Microbial Network Complexity and Assembly Processes in Larix olgensis. Microorganisms, 14(2), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop