Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Tank Disinfectants on the Development of Microbiota in Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Larviculture Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Eight Pathogens Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex from Clinical Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Early Response of Rhizosphere Microbial Community Network Characteristics to Thinning Intensity in Pinus massoniana Plantations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Analysis of PRV-1 in Atlantic Salmon and PRV-3 in Coho Salmon: Host-Specific Immune Responses and Apoptosis in Red Blood Cells
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Animal Models of Pathogenic New World Arenaviruses

Microorganisms 2025, 13(6), 1358; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061358
by Alexander V. Alvarado 1,2, Robert W. Cross 1,2, Thomas W. Geisbert 1,2 and Courtney Woolsey 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2025, 13(6), 1358; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061358
Submission received: 19 April 2025 / Revised: 29 May 2025 / Accepted: 9 June 2025 / Published: 11 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Viral Infectious Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

As a whole, the manuscript is well written and contains informative details regarding the state of animal models in the field. However, presentation of the material can be re-organized for clarity.

Introduction: This is generally well written, however, the flow of information is choppy and can be improved. There is a jump from general epidemiology info to genetics to host cell entry to countermeasures. Since the focus of this review is animal models, it may be better for the readers to remove the individual sections later on about epidemiology and clinical manifestations and keep that generalized to the introduction. A table or figure on clinical symptom onset could be beneficial in this section 

Figures are repetitive. It would be more appropriate to have one figure of each style (rodent and NHP) that addresses the viruses in the family that are appropriate for each subtopic (pathogenesis, treatment, etc) instead of replicating near-identical figures for each virus subsection. 

While the tables are extensive and information, they may be better suited as written as supplemental tables and shorter, more informative tables can be inserted within the text. For example, in Table 1, there are rodents of the same strain at various ages as their own line item but the details of virus strain, clinical disease, etc are very similar. These could be combined. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

For the five types of sarcovirus that pose a continuous and serious threat to human public health (with a case fatality rate basically above 30%) and lack specific medical countermeasures (lacking safe and effective vaccines and therapeutic drugs), the morbidity, clinical symptoms and lesions caused by these five pathogens in various parts of the world over a long period of time are described in detail. The pathogenic model animals of four types of sarcovirus were introduced in particular detail, providing model tools for future research on the pathogenic mechanism, clinical manifestations, pathological changes, disease prognosis of these diseases, as well as the development and screening of safe and effective vaccines and therapeutic drugs. This is conducive to in-depth research and correct diagnosis and differentiation of these diseases. It will play a promoting role in the development of safe and effective vaccines and therapeutic drugs for these diseases.

Several diseases caused by the sand virus pathogen are placed in one article, allowing people to systematically and comparatively understand and identify these diseases and their model animals.

Overall, the author failed to summarize, sort out and process the literature materials well. Instead, they listed the materials in a general way. For example: (1) A table can be used to sort out the commonalities and individualities of the clinical symptoms and pathological changes of the five diseases. (2) Figures 1 to 5 are summarized into one figure; (3) Tables 1 to 16 should be transformed into four tables, or simply summarized in words instead of listing them one by one. It is absolutely not allowed to describe the daily performance after the drug attack and so on.

Errors: (1) The textual description part after Table 6 was written as Table 8, and the textual description part after Table 8 was written as Table 6. (2) In many places in the text, only the last digit of two starting and ending percentages is followed by a percentage sign. Such as 15%-30% instead of 15%-30%.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop