Next Article in Journal
Generation of a Human–Mouse Chimeric Anti-Japanese Encephalitis Virus and Zika Virus Monoclonal Antibody Using CDR Grafting
Previous Article in Journal
MecVax, an Epitope- and Structure-Based Broadly Protective Subunit Vaccine Against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Culture-Dependent Bioprospecting of Halophilic Microorganisms from Portuguese Salterns

by
Eduarda Almeida
1,2,
Adrianna Jackiewicz
1,
Maria de Fátima Carvalho
2,3 and
Olga Maria Lage
1,2,*
1
Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto (FCUP), Rua do Campo Alegre s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
2
CIIMAR/CIMAR LA, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos s/n, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
3
ICBAS—School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2867; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122867
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 2 December 2025 / Accepted: 12 December 2025 / Published: 17 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)

Abstract

Extreme hypersaline environments harbour a unique biodiversity capable of surviving in such habitats, including halophilic and halotolerant bacteria. Microbial adaptations to these environments comprehend two main strategies: the “salt-in” that involves a high intracellular concentration of salts (e.g., potassium), and the “salt-out” that relies on the accumulation of small organic compounds (e.g., glycine betaine and trehalose). These evolutionary haloadaptations, combined with natural population competitiveness, often promotes the production of distinctive antimicrobial compounds, highlighting hypersaline environments as promising rich sources of novel natural products with biotechnological potential. Aiming at enlarging the knowledge on the microbiota of two Portuguese salterns (Aveiro and Olhão), microbial isolation was performed using salt and saline sediment samples. A total of 39 microbial isolates were obtained in a saline medium, affiliated with Bacillota, Pseudomonadota, Actinomycetota, and Rhodothermaeota and the archaeal phylum Euryarchaeota. All isolates are generally common in saline habitats, with most (79%) exhibiting a halotolerant profile. Regarding the presence of biosynthetic related genes, 28% of the isolates lacked type I genes for polyketide synthases or non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, 36% contained at least one of these genes, and 36% possessed both. This study provides evidence of the biotechnological potential of the microbiota from two Portuguese salterns.

1. Introduction

Halophiles are microorganisms found across the three domains of life, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, that inhabit hypersaline environments [1], such as saline lakes, salt pans, salt marshes, saline soils, or salted food products. Regarding their salt (NaCl) concentrations, they can be classified into slight (1–5%), moderate (5–20%), and extreme (20–30%) halophiles. Furthermore, there are microorganisms that can grow in both the absence or presence of high salt concentrations, which are referred to as halotolerant [2]. In order to maintain osmotic balance while living in such challenging environments, these microorganisms rely on two main survival strategies: (i) extensive molecular adaptations of their proteome to high salt concentrations, and (ii) synthesis or uptake of organic compatible solutes (also called osmolytes) [3]. In high salt concentrations, the proteomes have consistently shown a marked enrichment of small, polar, and acidic amino acids such as aspartate and glutamate, which occur mainly at the protein surface [4]. These proteins are so specialized that they interact with a solvent characterized by high ionic strength and reduced water activity, while still preserving the same functional roles as their non-halophilic counterparts. The second strategy relies on the microbial ability to exclude salts from cytoplasm along with the production and accumulation of organic-compatible solutes, such as glutamate, glutamine, proline, or ectoine, which confer osmotic balance to the microbial cells, thus preventing enzymatic inhibition, inactivation, and denaturation [5,6].
The above listed strategies clearly demonstrate the wide battery of metabolic adaptations carried out by the living microbiota inhabiting hypersaline habitats, which are also, many times, associated with other extreme environmental factors besides the high salt concentration, such as alkaline pH, high temperatures, and solar radiations [1]. These adaptations and others associated with, for example, populational competitiveness can induce the production of many natural products (NPs) with biotechnological interest. As such, halophiles have been considered good candidates for the search of novel important molecules [7,8,9].
Portugal has a coastline of 2830 km, of which 943 km are in continental territory. These 943 km harbour five major locations of salt flats, i.e., large areas with sets of several salterns, namely in Aveiro, Figueira da Foz, Tejo, Sado, and Algarve. Despite this abundance of salt pans, their microbiota is understudied. There are some reports (i) describing new strains observed in metagenomics studies from the Tavira saltern (Algarve salt flats) [10], (ii) relying on metagenomics studies from the Algarve salt flats [11,12,13], (iii) characterizing new species from the Tavira saltern [14] and from the Tejo salt flats [15], (iv) consisting of a genome announcement of an archaeal isolate from the Figueira da Foz salt flats [16], and (v) applying an extensive isolation approach targeting an Aveiro saltern and a saltern from Olhão (Algarve salt flats) without any special focus on halophiles [17,18].
For the present study, salt and sediments from two geographically distant Portuguese salterns (Aveiro and Olhão) were used, aiming at the isolation of halophiles. All strains obtained under culture were phylogenetically identified based on the 16S rRNA gene. Moreover, salinity profiles of the isolates were evaluated, as well as the presence of genes associated with the synthesis of bioactive compounds. Ultimately, the present work represents an additional contribution for enlarging the knowledge on the microbial diversity of Portuguese salterns and on its biotechnological potential, also providing different and distinctive strains for further biotechnological studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Microbial Isolation

Wet salt and sediment from below the salt (biological crusts formed by microorganisms or other non-salt materials) samples (one from each) were collected directly from ponds of artisanal salt production at Aveiro saltern in September 2018 and Olhão in August 2018. For saltern locations see Table S1. The samples were used for microbial isolation, aiming at obtaining halophilic microorganisms. SW (seawater) medium, adapted from López-Hermoso et al. [19], was used as a NaCl-enriched medium at neutral pH and consisted of (g L−1) 125 NaCl, 9.75 MgCl2.6H2O, 15.25 MgSO4.7H2O, 0.25 CaCl2, 1.5 NaHCO3, 0.175 KBr, 5 yeast extract, and 16 agar.
Salt samples were dissolved to saturation and serially diluted up to 10−3, with both procedures using sterile seawater as solvent. Concerning sediment samples, vigorous vortexing was applied to resuspend 1 g of each saltern sediment, individually, in 1 mL of sterile seawater. From this suspension, serial dilutions up to 10−3 were made in sterile seawater. All samples, including the initial suspensions and their corresponding dilutions, were plated on SW agar medium and incubated at 30 °C for one month. Bacterial colonies with different morphotypes were picked and re-streaked in the same medium until axenic cultures were obtained. These cultures were then cryopreserved in 24% glycerol at −80 °C.

2.2. Bacterial DNA Extraction

Axenic cultures grown in SW broth were used for DNA extraction by employing the E.Z.N.A. Bacterial DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quantification was carried out in the µDropTM platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and DNA quality was screened through a 100 V electrophoresis for 30 min in a 0.8% agarose gel with 1X Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and stained with GreenSafe Premium (NZYTech, Lisboa, Portugal). Gels were visualized on the Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR system, Image Lab version 6.1.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.3. Microbial Identification

The universal primers 27F and 1492R [20] were used for the PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene, while the archaeal universal primers 340F and 1000R [21] were used to amplify the 16S rRNA gene of Archaea.
PCR reactions for bacterial DNA consisted of a mixture (25 µL) of 1 × NZYTaq 2 × Green Master Mix (NZYTech, Lisboa, Portugal), 0.1 µM of each primer, and 25 ng of DNA template. For the archaeal DNA, the only change applied to the PCR reactions preparation was the primer concentrations, where 0.5 µM of each primer was used. The PCR programme for bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplification consisted in an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 56 °C, and 1.5 min at 72 °C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. For Archaea, PCR protocol relied on an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 57 °C, and 1.5 min at 72 °C, and a final extension of 7 min at 72 °C. The MyCycler™ Thermo Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for the PCR amplification in both cases. Amplicons were visualized in the Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR system after electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel with 1 × TAE buffer, stained with GreenSafe Premium. The PCR products were purified using Cytiva Life Sciences™ illustra™ GFXTM PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), and amplicons were sequenced at Eurofins Genomics Germany GmbH (Ebersberg, Germany).
Sequence analyses were conducted using Geneious Prime 2023.0 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). The curated sequences were matched in the EzBioCloud [22] to their closest relatives, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7 software [23]. Specifically, 16S rRNA gene sequences from both the isolates obtained in this study and their closest related strains were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm considering a Gap Open Penalty of 15.00 and a Gap Extension Penalty of 6.66. This multiple alignment was used to build a phylogenetic tree by applying the Maximum Likelihood statistical method, the phylogeny test based on Bootstrap method considering 1000 replicates, and the Tamura–Nei substitution model. The Archaea Halobacterium salinarum was used as outgroup.
All 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolates were deposited in the GenBank database at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under the accession numbers MZ818003 till MZ818041.

2.4. Dereplication of Strains Affiliated with the Same Species

The fingerprinting methods BOX-A1R-based repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR (BOX-PCR) and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) PCR were applied for dereplication of the isolates affiliated with the same species. The reaction mixture for BOX-PCR consisted of 25 µL containing 1 × NZYTaq 2 × Green Master Mix, 0.3 µM primer BOXA1R (5′-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3′) [24], and 25 ng DNA template. A similar PCR mixture was used for ERIC-PCR, with exception of the primers: ERIC1R (5′-ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC-3′) and ERIC2 (5′-AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG-3′) [25] were used instead of BOXA1R, each at a concentration of 0.4 µM.
The PCR protocol for BOX-PCR comprised an initial denaturation step of 7 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 48 °C, and 8 min at 72 °C, and a final extension of 16 min at 72 °C. For ERIC-PCR, PCR programme consisted of an initial denaturation step of 7 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 52 °C, and 8 min at 72 °C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The MyCycler™ Thermo Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for both amplifications, and PCR products were visualized in the Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR system after electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel with 1 × TAE buffer, stained with GreenSafe Premium.

2.5. Isolates’ Halophilic Profiles

The microbial growth of all isolates at different NaCl concentrations was assessed in SW broth medium prepared with 8 different salt concentrations, namely, 0%, 3%, 5%, 8%, 13%, 20%, 25%, and 35% (salt saturation point). The NaCl concentration used for isolation, namely, 12.5%, was used as positive control. These assays were conducted in 24-well plates, with each well containing 600 µL of broth medium with inoculum adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland units. Negative controls consisting of SW broth without inoculum (blanks) were also included in the assay. All conditions were tested in triplicate and incubated at room temperature with 200 rpm agitation for up to 2 weeks. Absorbance at 600 nm was measured to evaluate microbial growth, with the exception of the actinobacterial strain ASED46, which exhibited a non-suspension-like growth. In this case, visual evaluation of growth or non-growth was applied. End-assay aseptic controls in SW agar medium were carried out for all strains.

2.6. Isolates’ Bioactive Potentials

A PCR-based approach was applied for the genomic prospection of the bioactive potential of the isolates. Specifically, fragments of the β-ketosynthase (KS) domain within type I polyketide synthase genes (PKS-I) were targeted using the degenerate primers MDPQQRf (5′-RTRGAYCCNCAGCAICG-3′) and HGTGTr (5′-VGTNCCNGTGCCRTG-3′) [26]. The presence of non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) genes was assessed using the primers MTF2 [5′-GCNGG(C/T)GG(C/T)GCNTA(C/T)GTNCC-3′, corresponding to the AGGAYVP core motif I] and MTR [5′-CCNCG(AGT)AT(TC)TTNAC(T/C)TG-3′, corresponding to the QVKIRG core motif V] [27]. For the amplification of both genes, the planctomycetal strain UC49.1 was used as positive control. PCR mixtures of 25 µL, containing 1 × NZYTaq 2 × Green Master Mix, 0.8 µM of each primer, and 25 ng DNA template were prepared. The PCR protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 95 °C, 11 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 60 °C, and 1 min extension at 72 °C, with the annealing temperature reduced by 2 °C every cycle, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 40 °C, and 1 min extension at 72 °C, and a final extension step of 10 min at 72 °C [28]. The PCR reaction was carried out in a MyCycler™ Thermo Cycler, and the amplicons were visualized using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR system after electrophoresis at 80 V for 1 h in a 1.2% agarose gel prepared with 1 × TAE buffer and stained with GreenSafe Premium (NZYtech, Lisboa, Portugal). Expected sizes for NRPS and PKS amplificons are approximately 1000 and 700 bp, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

The culture-dependent methodology applied allowed for the isolation of 39 microorganisms, 20 from Aveiro and 19 from Olhão. These microorganisms were phylogenetically distributed across two domains of life and five phyla, as shown in the phylogenetic tree presented in Figure 1. The Archaea domain is represented by a single Halobacteriota isolate with 99.65% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to Haladaptatus paucihalophilus. Most of the microorganisms obtained belong to the Bacteria domain and were distributed across four phyla, with the vast majority being phylogenetically related to Bacillota (71.7%, n = 28). Members of Pseudomonadota represented 20.5% (n = 8) of the cultured fraction, while the phyla Actinomycetota and Rhodothermaeota only represented 2.6% (n = 1) each. Regarding location, phylum-level diversity in Olhão was lower, with only two different phyla identified, Pseudomonadota (10.5%, n = 2) and Bacillota (89.5%, n = 17). In contrast, in Aveiro, five phyla were recovered, specifically Pseudomonadota (30%, n = 6), Bacillota (55%, n = 11), Rhodothermaeota (5%, n = 1), Actinomycetota (5%, n = 1), and Euryarchaeota (Archaea; 5%, n = 1) (Figure 2A). A quite similar phyla profile to Aveiro was observed in Romanian saline lakes [29]. Despite the low phyla diversity observed in Olhão isolates, the genus abundance was quite similar in both locations, since eight different genera were obtained from Aveiro and seven from Olhão (Figure 2B). The different genera recovered in this study have already been associated with saltern extreme hypersaline environments.
In Table 1, the halophilic profiles are provided. Figure 3 shows the fingerprinting profiles that are discriminated in Table 1. Further details on the isolates, like the affiliation similarity, are given in Table S1.
Having a look more in detail, the archaeal isolate AS115 from Aveiro showed a 99.65% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to the halophilic strain Haladaptatus paucihalophilus, which was isolated from the Zodletone Spring NSF Microbial Observatory in Oklahoma (USA) and exhibits optimal growth at 18% NaCl [30]. Isolate AS115 confirmed its halophilic nature (growth from 8% to 20% NaCl). In addition, strains closely related to AS115 and H. paucihalophilus have also been identified in other saline environments in India and Brazil (NCBI accession numbers JX428947 and KF650688, and KC313060, respectively), as well as in coastal environments in Essex, UK [31].
The Rhodothermaeota isolate ASED47 showed close phylogenetic affiliation with Aliifodinibius roseus, originally isolated from a salt mine [32]. To the best of our knowledge, this species was never associated with salterns before. Concerning A. roseus, Wang et al. [32] reported growth under NaCl concentrations from 4 to 20%, but the halophilic profile of ASED47 was not determined, because this isolate lost viability after cryopreservation.
The Actinomycetota strain ASED46 showed a phylogenetically close relationship with Saccharomonospora iraqiensis. This described species was obtained from extreme saline soils in Iraq [33] and is also reported to occur in Sahara soils (NCBI accession number FJ968730) and at a salty beach on the Tarim Basin river, China (NCBI accession number JX244088). Strain ASED46 showed to be halophilic (growth from 3 to 13% NaCl), while S. iraqiensis IQ-H1T, previously known as Actinopolyspora iraqiensis, showed growth from 5 to 20% NaCl [33].
Of the eight Pseudomonadota obtained, four (OSED1, OSED15, ASED32, and ASED36) were closely affiliated with Halomonas fontilapidosi, three (ASED33, ASED42, and ASED43) showed a phylogenetic affiliation with Halomonas koreensis, and one (AS118) was affiliated with Halomonas cerina. Members of the Halomonas genus were isolated from a wide range of saline habitats [1,34,35,36,37,38,39], and the referred species have already been recovered from the Olhão saltern [17].
Isolates OSED1, ASED32, and ASED36 proved to be halophilic (growth from 3 to 20% NaCl), while isolate OSED15 exhibited a halotolerant profile. H. fontilapidosi was isolated from an endorreic saline wetland in Spain and is reported to be halophilic [40]. Although these four isolates were affiliated with the same species, fingerprinting analyses revealed that each represents a distinct strain of H. fontilapidosi. Regarding isolates ASED33, ASED42, and ASED43, only isolate ASED42 exhibited a halophilic profile comparable to the previously described H. koreensis, isolated from a solar saltern in Korea [41]. Additionally, BOX- and ERIC-PCRs showed that only two of these three isolates (ASED33 and ASED42) are representatives of the strain H. koreensis. Isolate AS118 showed 97.9% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to its closest known relative Halomonas cerina. This described species was specifically isolated from the saline environment of Rambla Salada in Spain [36,42]. As a threshold of 99% can be considered to distinguishable between different species [43], AS118 probably represents a new species within the Halomonas genus. Isolate AS118 was shown to possess a halophilic profile similar to H. cerina [42].
Concerning Bacillota, eight genera in a total of 28 strains were isolated. These include members of Alkalihalobacillus (n = 3), Bacillus (n = 3), Halobacillus (n = 4), Oceanobacillus (n = 4), Pontibacillus (n = 6), Virgibacillus (n = 5), Marinococcus (n = 1), and Staphylococcus (n = 2).
Isolates AS117, OSED4, and OSED12 were phylogenetically close to Alkalihalobacillus hwajinpoensis, but they represent distinct strains within this species. A. hwajinpoensis has been associated before with the bacterial diversity of Aveiro and Olhão salterns [17], as well as with worldwide salterns [42,44]. These three strains showed a halotolerant profile (growth from 0% to 13% or 20% NaCl). A. hwajinpoensis (previously known as Bacillus hwajinpoensis) was characterized as a halophile, being able to grow at NaCl concentrations between 0.1 and 19% [45].
The three strains phylogenetically affiliated with Bacillus swezeyi (OSED6, OSED7, and OSED13) were shown to be halotolerants (growth from 0% up to 13% NaCl) and represented the clonal line. B. swezeyi was isolated from a soil sample (1–3 cm depth) collected from Evolution Canyon III at Nahal Shaharut in the southern Negev Desert in Israel, demonstrating its ability to adapt to extreme conditions, with growth from 0% to 12% NaCl [46].
Of the four isolates affiliated with Halobacillus halophilus (ASED35, ASED37, ASED41, and ASED45), three of them lost viability after cryopreservation. Therefore, the halophilic profile was only assessed for ASED45 that grew from 0% to NaCl saturation (<35% NaCl). H. halophilus, first described in 1983 under the name Sporosarcina halophila and isolated from salt marsh soils, could grow from 0 to 15% NaCl [47]. Related strains have also been reported in the salterns of Santa Pola, Spain [48]. Fingerprinting studies also showed that two out of the four H. halophilus isolates (ASED35 and ASED37) are colonal.
The four isolates affiliated with Oceanobacillus picturae (OS11, OS12, OSED2, and OSED14) represent distinct strains. A similar prevalence was previously reported in Olhão salterns but not in Aveiro and other salterns [49,50]. All O. picturae-related isolates grew at NaCl concentrations ranging from 0% to 13% or 20%. The description of O. picturae (formerly known as Virgibacillus picturae) was based on eight different isolates, all of which were capable of growing at NaCl concentrations between 0% and 10% [51].
The five isolates (ASED34, ASED38, ASED39, ASED40, and ASED44) affiliated with Pontibacillus salipaludis (originally described from an Indian saltern; [52]) represent distinct strains within this species. The halophilic profile could only be assessed for ASED34 and ASED39 (growth from 0% to 25% NaCl) and ASED44 (growth between 0% and 8% NaCl), indicating different NaCl requirements compared to the described P. salipaludis strain, which showed growth at 1 to 19% NaCl [53]. Another Pontibacillus isolate (OSED3) was affiliated with an undescribed Pontibacillus species previously isolated from a Greek solar saltern [49]. The second most closely related strain to OSED3 was Pontibacillus marinus, with 96.49% similarity, which was isolated from a dry salt lake in China [39]. Moreover, OSED3 showed a halotolerant profile by growing at 0 to 13% NaCl.
Although Virgibacillus salarius has been described to be unable to grow in the absence of salt [52], all five isolates obtained in our study were able to grow from 0 to 13% NaCl. V. salarius was obtained from dry salt lakes in the Tunisian Sahara and was also reported in salterns from Bulgaria [37]. Of the five isolates, OSED8 and OSED10 may represent the same strain.
The isolate AS116 related to the species Marinococcus halotolerans, showing the same halophilic profile as the M. halotolerans type of strain [54], with both being able to grow from 0 to 25% NaCl. The prevalence of the strains of M. halotolerans in salterns has been widely reported [48,49].
In general, all the isolates obtained were affiliated with strains associated with saline environments and showed optimum growth at NaCl concentrations similar to those described for their phylogenetically close type strains. The exception was the two Staphylococcus isolates (OS12 and OS13, namely, S. warneri and S. epidermidis, respectively), which are human skin commensals [55], but also are described in many other environments. Their presence in salt samples from the Olhão saltern might be a consequence of human activity in this specific site, as in addition to artisanal salt production, saltern baths are also a common tourist activity there.
Overall, the halophilic profile of the isolates discussed above, taking into account their phyla taxonomic rank, is summarized in Figure 4.
The biotechnological potential of all isolates obtained in this study was screened through a PCR method targeting PKS-I and NRPS genes (Table 2 and Table S1). The microbial ability to produce metabolites with biotechnological applications is not exclusively linked to PKS and NRPS genes, as many other genes can also be responsible for the production of bioactive NPs [56]. Nonetheless, Zothanpuia et al. [57] demonstrated that the presence of these genes in microorganisms are good indicators for the production of bioactive compounds. Moreover, many NPs, namely, polyketides (PK), non-ribosomal peptides (NRP), or even PK/NRP hybrids, represent compounds with economical and pharmacological relevance [58,59]. Of the 39 microorganisms analyzed, 11 (28%) did not exhibit any potential PKS or NRPS genes, while 28 (72%) potentially carried either one or both types of genes: 6 isolates (15%) were PKS-positive, 8 isolates (21%) were NRPS-positive, and 14 isolates (36%) contained both gene types.
Members of the genus Halomonas are recognized for their biotechnological potential associated with PKS and NRPS genes [60,61,62], as well as for their ability to produce exopolysaccharides [63,64,65,66], synthetize compatible solutes [67], and degrade aromatic compounds [68]. Furthermore, PKS and NRPS biosynthetic gene clusters have been widely documented in Bacillus members [69,70,71], underpinning their ability to produce a diverse array of NPs. Such biosynthetic potential enhances Bacillus fitness in competitive environments, exemplified by pharmacologically important antibiotics like bacillaene and bacitracin [71].

4. Conclusions

The Olhão saltern isolates obtained in this study were predominantly halotolerant, since only 1 isolate out of 19 affiliated with H. fontilapidosi, showed a strict requirement of NaCl. A more balanced population of isolates was obtained from the Aveiro saltern, with 43% of isolates presenting a halophilic profile and 57% a halotolerant profile. Specifically, all the Bacillota isolates were halotolerant. Moreover, although many isolates were affiliated with the same species, fingerprinting using BOX- and ERIC-PCR revealed a low prevalence of identical strain representatives, indicating the presence of intraspecies diversity. Additionally, with a few exceptions, the two fingerprinting methods applied provided a good overlap of results.
The high demand in the discovery of novel NPs with pharmaceutical applications as antimicrobial and anticancer compounds led to the search of unexplored environments like hypersaline environments. The efforts carried out by the scientific community in recent decades recognized hypersaline habitats as rich pools of undiscovered organisms with distinctive biotechnological potential besides pharmaceutical [72,73]. The saltern isolates obtained in this study represent an important source of microorganisms for further research works aiming at finding novel bioactive NPs. This is further supported by the high proportion of isolates (72%) harbouring bioactivity-related genes. Furthermore, saline microorganisms are well known for their potential regarding hydrolytic enzymes [74] but scarcely known for their bioactive potential regarding NPs. Our results also enlighten their potential for the biotechnological production of NPs. For example, the bioactive properties of haloarchaea remain understudied when compared to other major groups as bacteria, plants, or algae. However, the archaeal isolate AS115 obtained in this study harboured an NRPS gene in its genome.
The results described here confirm previous findings from the same two salterns, where a seawater-level saline medium was employed [18]. Specifically, H. fontilapidosi, A. hwajinpoensis, O. picturae, and S. warneri isolates were transversal to both studies, indicating them as putatively autochthonous strains of these salterns.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13122867/s1, Table S1: Information on the isolates obtained from Aveiro and Olhão salterns.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A. and O.M.L.; methodology, E.A. and O.M.L.; investigation, E.A. and A.J.; resources, O.M.L.; data curation, E.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.; writing—review and editing, E.A., A.J., M.d.F.C., and O.M.L.; visualization, E.A.; supervision, M.d.F.C. and O.M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FCT, which partially supported this research through the projects UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDB/04565/2020. E.A. was supported by FCT for the Ph.D. Grant SFRH/BD/125527/2016.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Repositories: Sequences data were deposited at GenBank database under accession numbers from MZ818003 to MZ818041.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NRPSNon-ribosomal Peptide Synthetase
PKSPolyketide Synthase
NPsNatural Products
ERICEnterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus
BOXBox Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic
PCRPolymerase Chain Reaction
KSβ-ketosynthase

References

  1. Ma, Y.; Galinski, E.A.; Grant, W.D.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A. Halophiles 2010: Life in Saline Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6971–6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amoozegar, M.A.; Safarpour, A.; Noghabi, K.A.; Bakhtiary, T.; Ventosa, A. Halophiles and Their Vast Potential in Biofuel Production. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bowers, K.J.; Mesbah, N.M.; Wiegel, J. Biodiversity of poly-extremophilic Bacteria: Does combining the extremes of high salt, alkaline pH and elevated temperature approach a physico-chemical boundary for life? Saline Syst. 2009, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ortega-Quintanilla, G.; Millet, O. On the Molecular Basis of the Hypersaline Adaptation of Halophilic Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2025, 169439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Courtenay, E.S.; Capp, M.W.; Anderson, C.F.; Record, M.T., Jr. Vapor Pressure Osmometry Studies of Osmolyte−Protein Interactions: Implications for the Action of Osmoprotectants in Vivo and for the Interpretation of “Osmotic Stress” Experiments in Vitro. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 4455–4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weinisch, L.; Kirchner, I.; Grimm, M.; Kühner, S.; Pierik, A.J.; Rosselló-Móra, R.; Filker, S. Glycine Betaine and Ectoine Are the Major Compatible Solutes Used by Four Different Halophilic Heterotrophic Ciliates. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 77, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ventosa, A.; Nieto, J.J.; Oren, A. Biology of Moderately Halophilic Aerobic Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 504–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Corral, P.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Ventosa, A. Halophiles and Their Biomolecules: Recent Advances and Future Applications in Biomedicine. Mar. Drugs 2019, 18, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rathakrishnan, D.; Gopalan, A.K. Isolation and characterization of halophilic isolates from Indian salterns and their screening for production of hydrolytic enzymes. Environ. Chall. 2022, 6, 100426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Spring, S.; Bunk, B.; Spröer, C.; Rohde, M.; Klenk, H.-P. Genome biology of a novel lineage of planctomycetes widespread in anoxic aquatic environments. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 2438–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nespoli, C.R. Characterization of Extreme Halophilic Prokaryotic Consortia of a Traditional Solar Saltern in Olhão. Master Thesis, Universidade do Algarve, Algarve, Portugal, 2009. Available online: https://sapientia.ualg.pt/entities/publication/15bc6c3f-0b21-4ae0-8264-fd06f554d206 (accessed on 17 September 2019).
  12. Filker, S.; Gimmler, A.; Dunthorn, M.; Mahé, F.; Stoeck, T. Deep sequencing uncovers protistan plankton diversity in the Portuguese Ria Formosa solar saltern ponds. Extremophiles 2015, 19, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Filker, S.; Forster, D.; Weinisch, L.; Mora-Ruiz, M.; González, B.; Farías, M.E.; Rosselló-Móra, R.; Stoeck, T. Transition boundaries for protistan species turnover in hypersaline waters of different biogeographic regions. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 3186–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pradel, N.; Fardeau, M.-L.; Tindall, B.J.; Spring, S. Anaerohalosphaera lusitana gen. nov., sp. nov., and Limihaloglobus sulfuriphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from solar saltern sediments, and proposal of Anaerohalosphaeraceae fam. nov. within the order Sedimentisphaerales. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1321–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nissen, H.; Dundas, I.D. Rhodospirillum salinarum sp. nov., a halophilic photosynthetic bacterium isolated from a Portuguese saltern. Arch. Microbiol. 1984, 138, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. L’Haridon, S.; Corre, E.; Guan, Y.; Vinu, M.; La Cono, V.; Yakimov, M.; Stingl, U.; Toffin, L.; Jebbar, M. Complete Genome Sequence of the Halophilic Methylotrophic Methanogen Archaeon Methanohalophilus portucalensis Strain FDF-1T. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e01482-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Almeida, E.; Dias, T.V.; Ferraz, G.; Carvalho, M.F.; Lage, O.M. Culturable bacteria from two Portuguese salterns: Diversity and bioactive potential. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Almeida, E.; Carvalho, M.F.; Lage, O.M. Culturomics remains a highly valuable methodology to obtain rare microbial diversity with putative biotechnological potential from two Portuguese salterns. Front. Biosci. 2022, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. López-Hermoso, C.; de la Haba, R.R.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Ventosa, A. Salinivibrio kushneri sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from salterns. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 41, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Stackebrandt, E., Goodfellow, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gantner, S.; Andersson, A.F.; Alonso-Sáez, L.; Bertilsson, S. Novel primers for 16S rRNA-based archaeal community analyses in environmental samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 2011, 84, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.-M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Versalovic, J.; Schneider, M.; De Bruijn, F.J.; Lupski, J.R. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol. Cell Biol. 1994, 5, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  25. Versalovic, J.; Koeuth, T.; Lupski, R. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to finerpriting of bacterial enomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 6823–6831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, T.K.; Garson, M.J.; Fuerst, J.A. Marine actinomycetes related to the “Salinospora” group from the Great Barrier Reef sponge Pseudoceratina clavata. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Neilan, B.A.; Dittmann, E.; Rouhiainen, L.; Bass, R.A.; Schaub, V.; Sivonen, K.; Börner, T. Nonribosomal peptide synthesis and toxigenicity of cyanobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4089–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Graça, A.P.; Viana, F.; Bondoso, J.; Correia, M.I.; Gomes, L.; Humanes, M.; Reis, A.; Xavier, J.R.; Gaspar, H.; Lage, O.M. The antimicrobial activity of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from the marine sponge Erylus deficiens (Astrophorida, Geodiidae). Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ruginescu, R.; Gomoiu, I.; Popescu, O.; Cojoc, R.; Neagu, S.; Lucaci, I.; Batrinescu-Moteau, C.; Enache, M. Bioprospecting for Novel Halophilic and Halotolerant Sources of Hydrolytic Enzymes in Brackish, Saline and Hypersaline Lakes of Romania. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Savage, K.N.; Krumholz, L.R.; Oren, A.; Elshahed, M.S. Haladaptatus paucihalophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic archaeon isolated from a low-salt, sulfide-rich spring. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Purdy, K.J.; Cresswell-Maynard, T.D.; Nedwell, D.B.; McGenity, T.J.; Grant, W.D.; Timmis, K.N.; Embley, T.M. Isolation of haloarchaea that grow at low salinities. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, Y.-X.; Liu, J.-H.; Xiao, W.; Ma, X.-L.; Lai, Y.-H.; Li, Z.-Y.; Ji, K.-Y.; Wen, M.-L.; Cui, X.-L. Aliifodinibius roseus gen. nov., sp. nov., and Aliifodinibius sediminis sp. nov., two moderately halophilic bacteria isolated from salt mine samples. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 2907–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ruan, J.-S.; Al-Tai, A.M.; Zhou, Z.-H.; Qu, L.-H. Actinopolyspora iraqiensis sp. nov., a New Halophilic Actinomycete Isolated from Soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1994, 44, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baati, H.; Amdouni, R.; Gharsallah, N.; Sghir, A.; Ammar, E. Isolation and Characterization of Moderately Halophilic Bacteria from Tunisian Solar Saltern. Curr. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ghai, R.; Pašić, L.; Fernández, A.B.; Martin-Cuadrado, A.-B.; Mizuno, C.M.; McMahon, K.D.; Papke, R.T.; Stepanauskas, R.; Rodriguez-Brito, B.; Rohwer, F.; et al. New Abundant Microbial Groups in Aquatic Hypersaline Environments. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oueriaghli, N.; González-Domenech, C.M.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Muyzer, G.; Ventosa, A.; Quesada, E.; Béjar, V. Diversity and distribution of Halomonas in Rambla Salada, a hypersaline environment in the southeast of Spain. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 87, 460–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boyadzhieva, I.; Tomova, I.; Radchenkova, N.; Kambourova, M.; Poli, A.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E. Diversity of Heterotrophic Halophilic Bacteria Isolated from Coastal Solar Salterns, Bulgaria and Their Ability to Synthesize Bioactive Molecules with Biotechnological Impact. Microbiology 2018, 87, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sen, U.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K. Microbial community composition of saltern soils from Ramnagar, West Bengal, India. Ecol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 12, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guan, T.-W.; Lin, Y.-J.; Ou, M.-Y.; Chen, K.-B. Isolation and diversity of sediment bacteria in the hypersaline aiding lake, China. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. González-Domenech, C.M.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Quesada, E.; Béjar, V. Halomonas fontilapidosi sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, denitrifying bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lim, J.-M.; Yoon, J.-H.; Lee, J.-C.; Jeon, C.O.; Park, D.-J.; Sung, C.; Kim, C.-J. Halomonas koreensis sp. nov., a novel moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from a solar saltern in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 2037–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. González-Domenech, C.M.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Quesada, E.; Béjar, V. Halomonas cerina sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, denitrifying, exopolysaccharide-producing bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Edgar, R.C. Updating the 97% identity threshold for 16S ribosomal RNA OTUs. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 2371–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, L.; Wang, G.; Bu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Lin, X. Phylogenetic analysis and screening of antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of moderately halophilic bacteria isolated from the Weihai Solar Saltern (China). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yoon, J.-H.; Kim, I.-G.; Kang, K.H.; Oh, T.-K.; Park, Y.-H. Bacillus hwajinpoensis sp. nov. and an unnamed Bacillus genomospecies, novel members of Bacillus rRNA group 6 isolated from sea water of the East Sea and the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dunlap, C.A.; Schisler, D.A.; Perry, E.B.; Connor, N.; Cohan, F.M.; Rooney, A.P. Bacillus swezeyi sp. nov. and Bacillus haynesii sp. nov., isolated from desert soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2720–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Claus, D.; Fahmy, F.; Rolf, H.; Tosunoglu, N. Sporosarcina halophila sp. nov., an Obligate, Slightly Halophilic Bacterium from Salt Marsh Soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1983, 4, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ventosa, A.; Fernández, A.B.; León, M.J.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Rodriguez-Valera, F. The Santa Pola saltern as a model for studying the microbiota of hypersaline environments. Extremophiles 2014, 18, 811–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tsiamis, G.; Katsaveli, K.; Ntougias, S.; Kyrpides, N.; Andersen, G.; Piceno, Y.; Bourtzis, K. Prokaryotic community profiles at different operational stages of a Greek solar saltern. Res. Microbiol. 2008, 159, 609–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Naghoni, A.; Emtiazi, G.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Cretoiu, M.S.; Stal, L.J.; Etemadifar, Z.; Fazeli, S.A.S.; Bolhuis, H. Microbial diversity in the hypersaline Lake Meyghan, Iran. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Heyrman, J.; Logan, N.A.; Busse, H.-J.; Balcaen, A.; Lebbe, L.; Rodriguez-Diaz, M.; Swings, J.; De Vos, P. Virgibacillus carmonensis sp. nov., Virgibacillus necropolis sp. nov. and Virgibacillus picturae sp. nov., three novel species isolated from deteriorated mural paintings, transfer of the species of the genus Salibacillus to Virgibacillus, as Virgibacillus marismortui comb. nov. and Virgibacillus salexigens comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Virgibacillus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hua, N.-P.; Hamza-Chaffai, A.; Vreeland, R.H.; Isoda, H.; Naganuma, T. Virgibacillus salarius sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from a Saharan salt lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 2409–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sultanpuram, V.R.; Mothe, T.; Mohammed, F.; Chintalapati, S.; Chintalapati, V.R. Pontibacillus salipaludis sp. nov., a slightly halophilic bacterium isolated from a salt pan. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 3884–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, W.-J.; Schumann, P.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Chen, G.-Z.; Tian, X.-P.; Xu, L.-H.; Stackebrandt, E.; Jiang, C.-L. Marinococcus halotolerans sp. nov., isolated from Qinghai, north-west China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1801–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Coates, R.; Moran, J.; Horsburgh, M.J. Staphylococci: Colonizers and Pathogens of Human Skin. Futur. Microbiol. 2014, 9, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, J.; Du, L.; Liu, F.; Xu, F.; Hu, B.; Venturi, V.; Qian, G. Involvement of both PKS and NRPS in antibacterial activity in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 355, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zothanpuia; Passari, A.K.; Gupta, V.K.; Singh, B.P. Detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria endowed with antimicrobial activity from a freshwater lake and their phylogenetic affiliation. PeerJ 2016, 4, e2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cane, D.E.; Walsh, C.T. The parallel and convergent universes of polyketide synthases and nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, R319–R325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kennedy, J.; Baker, P.; Piper, C.; Cotter, P.D.; Walsh, M.; Mooij, M.J.; Bourke, M.B.; Rea, M.C.; O’connor, P.M.; Ross, R.P.; et al. Isolation and Analysis of Bacteria with Antimicrobial Activities from the Marine Sponge Haliclona simulans Collected from Irish Waters. Mar. Biotechnol. 2009, 11, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, H.; Fewer, D.P.; Holm, L.; Rouhiainen, L.; Sivonen, K. Atlas of nonribosomal peptide and polyketide biosynthetic pathways reveals common occurrence of nonmodular enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9259–9264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Machado, H.; Sonnenschein, E.C.; Melchiorsen, J.; Gram, L. Genome mining reveals unlocked bioactive potential of marine Gram-negative bacteria. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Amoutzias, G.D.; Chaliotis, A.; Mossialos, D. Discovery Strategies of Bioactive Compounds Synthesized by Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases and Type-I Polyketide Synthases Derived from Marine Microbiomes. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Martínez-Checa, F.; Toledo, F.; Vilchez, R.; Quesada, E.; Calvo, C. Yield production, chemical composition, and functional properties of emulsifier H28 synthesized by Halomonas eurihalina strain H-28 in media containing various hydrocarbons. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Arias, S.; del Moral, A.; Ferrer, M.R.; Tallon, R.; Quesada, E.; Béjar, V. Mauran, an exopolysaccharide produced by the halophilic bacterium Halomonas maura, with a novel composition and interesting properties for biotechnology. Extremophiles 2003, 7, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mata, J.A.; Béjar, V.; Llamas, I.; Arias, S.; Bressollier, P.; Tallon, R.; Urdaci, M.C.; Quesada, E. Exopolysaccharides produced by the recently described halophilic bacteria Halomonas ventosae and Halomonas anticariensis. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Llamas, I.; Béjar, V.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Martínez-Cánovas, M.J.; Molina, I.; Quesada, E. Halomonas stenophila sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium that produces sulphate exopolysaccharides with biological activity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 2508–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Margesin, R.; Schinner, F. Potential of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms for biotechnology. Extremophiles 2001, 5, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. García, M.T.; Mellado, E.; Ostos, J.C.; Ventosa, A. Halomonas organivorans sp. nov., a moderate halophile able to degrade aromatic compounds. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fickers, P. Antibiotic Compounds from Bacillus: Why are they so Amazing? Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 8, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Grubbs, K.J.; Bleich, R.M.; Maria, K.C.S.; Allen, S.E.; Farag, S.; Team, A.; Shank, E.A.; Bowers, A.A. Large-Scale Bioinformatics Analysis of Bacillus Genomes Uncovers Conserved Roles of Natural Products in Bacterial Physiology. mSystems 2017, 2, e00040-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Harwood, C.R.; Mouillon, J.-M.; Pohl, S.; Arnau, J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Oren, A. Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Varrella, S.; Tangherlini, M.; Corinaldesi, C. Deep Hypersaline Anoxic Basins as Untapped Reservoir of Polyextremophilic Prokaryotes of Biotechnological Interest. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hashemzahi, A.; Makhkdoumi, A.; Asoodeh, A. Culturable diversity and enzyme production survey of halophilic prokaryotes from a solar saltern on the shore of the Oman Sea. J. Genet. Resour. 2020, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship between saltern isolates and their closely related described strains. The tree was constructed using the MEGA7 [23], with confidence assessed by bootstrapping values of 1000 replicates. * The archaeal species Halobacterium salinarum (AE004437) was used as out-group. Bar, 0.050 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship between saltern isolates and their closely related described strains. The tree was constructed using the MEGA7 [23], with confidence assessed by bootstrapping values of 1000 replicates. * The archaeal species Halobacterium salinarum (AE004437) was used as out-group. Bar, 0.050 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Microorganisms 13 02867 g001
Figure 2. Microbial diversity at phylum (A) and genus (B) levels obtained from salt and sediment samples from two Portuguese salterns, Aveiro and Olhão.
Figure 2. Microbial diversity at phylum (A) and genus (B) levels obtained from salt and sediment samples from two Portuguese salterns, Aveiro and Olhão.
Microorganisms 13 02867 g002
Figure 3. Results of the dereplication of saltern isolates affiliated with the same species through the fingerprinting methods BOX-PCR (A) and ERIC-PCR (B).
Figure 3. Results of the dereplication of saltern isolates affiliated with the same species through the fingerprinting methods BOX-PCR (A) and ERIC-PCR (B).
Microorganisms 13 02867 g003
Figure 4. Halophilic profile, at phylum level, of the isolates obtained from salt and sediment samples collected at Aveiro and Olhão salterns.
Figure 4. Halophilic profile, at phylum level, of the isolates obtained from salt and sediment samples collected at Aveiro and Olhão salterns.
Microorganisms 13 02867 g004
Table 1. Isolates obtained in this study, and respective data on the samples’ designation, phylogeny, halophilic profile (NaCl range), and fingerprinting profiles. Each different gel band pattern is associated with a different letter: lowercase for BOX-PCR and uppercase for ERIC-PCR.
Table 1. Isolates obtained in this study, and respective data on the samples’ designation, phylogeny, halophilic profile (NaCl range), and fingerprinting profiles. Each different gel band pattern is associated with a different letter: lowercase for BOX-PCR and uppercase for ERIC-PCR.
IsolatePhylumGenus% NaCl RangeBOX-PCR Pattern aERIC-PCR Pattern a
AS115Euryarchaeota (Archaea)Haladaptatus8 to 25NDND
ASED46ActinomycetotaSaccharomonospora3 to 13NDND
OSED4BacillotaAlkalihalobacillus0 to 13gG
OSED12BacillotaAlkalihalobacillus0 to 20hH
AS117BacillotaAlkalihalobacillus0 to 20iI
OSED13BacillotaBacillus0 to 13jJ
OSED6BacillotaBacillus0 to 13jJ
OSED7BacillotaBacillus0 to 13jJ
ASED35BacillotaHalobacillusNDsS
ASED37BacillotaHalobacillusNDsS
ASED45BacillotaHalobacillus0 to 35sα
ASED41BacillotaHalobacillusNDtS
AS116BacillotaMarinococcus0 to 25NDND
OS11BacillotaOceanobacillus0 to 13dD
OSED2BacillotaOceanobacillus0 to 13dY
OSED14BacillotaOceanobacillus0 to 13eE
OS14BacillotaOceanobacillus0 to 20fF
ASED39BacillotaPontibacillus0 to 25kK
ASED34BacillotaPontibacillus0 to 25lL
ASED40BacillotaPontibacillusNDmM
ASED44BacillotaPontibacillus0 to 8nN
ASED38BacillotaPontibacillusNDoO
OSED3BacillotaPontibacillus0 to 13NDND
OS13BacillotaStaphylococcus0 to 8NDND
OS12BacillotaStaphylococcus0 to 13NDND
OSED5BacillotaVirgibacillus0 to 13aA
OSED10BacillotaVirgibacillus0 to 13bB
OSED8BacillotaVirgibacillus0 to 13bB
OSED9BacillotaVirgibacillus0 to 13bZ
OSED11BacillotaVirgibacillus0 to 13cC
ASED42PseudomonadotaHalomonas3 to 20pP
ASED33PseudomonadotaHalomonas0 to 20pP
ASED43PseudomonadotaHalomonas0 to 20qQ
OSED15PseudomonadotaHalomonas0 to 20uU
OSED1PseudomonadotaHalomonas3 to 20vV
ASED36PseudomonadotaHalomonas3 to 20wW
ASED32PseudomonadotaHalomonas3 to 20xX
AS118PseudomonadotaHalomonas3 to 20NDND
ASED47RhodothermaeotaAliifodinibiusNDNDND
Table 2. Bioactive potential of isolated genera from Aveiro and Olhão, represented through the number of isolates harbouring potential PKS-I, NRPS, or both genes.
Table 2. Bioactive potential of isolated genera from Aveiro and Olhão, represented through the number of isolates harbouring potential PKS-I, NRPS, or both genes.
PhylumGenusTotal Number of IsolatesOnly
PKS-I
Only
NRPS
Both
ActinomycetotaSaccharomonospora1000
PseudomonadotaHalomonas8121
BacillotaPontibacillus6202
Halobacillus4022
Marinococcus1001
Bacillus3102
Oceanobacillus4002
Alkalihalobacillus3102
Virgibacillus5112
Staphylococcus2010
RhodothermaeotaAliifodinibius1001
Euryarchaeota (Archaea)Haladaptatus1010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almeida, E.; Jackiewicz, A.; Carvalho, M.d.F.; Lage, O.M. Culture-Dependent Bioprospecting of Halophilic Microorganisms from Portuguese Salterns. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122867

AMA Style

Almeida E, Jackiewicz A, Carvalho MdF, Lage OM. Culture-Dependent Bioprospecting of Halophilic Microorganisms from Portuguese Salterns. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(12):2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almeida, Eduarda, Adrianna Jackiewicz, Maria de Fátima Carvalho, and Olga Maria Lage. 2025. "Culture-Dependent Bioprospecting of Halophilic Microorganisms from Portuguese Salterns" Microorganisms 13, no. 12: 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122867

APA Style

Almeida, E., Jackiewicz, A., Carvalho, M. d. F., & Lage, O. M. (2025). Culture-Dependent Bioprospecting of Halophilic Microorganisms from Portuguese Salterns. Microorganisms, 13(12), 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop