Next Article in Journal
Comparative In Vitro Killing of Key Bovine Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens by Pradofloxacin and Eight Other Veterinary Antimicrobial Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Insights into Microbial Interactions and Fermented Food Quality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Storage Time on the Fermentation Quality, Bacterial Community Structure, and Metabolic Profiles of Jinmu Grain Grass Silage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/microorganisms13122680
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean

by
Mateus Neri Oliveira Reis
1,2,
Luciana Cristina Vitorino
1,2,*,
Marialva Alvarenga Moreira
3,
Alex Santos Macedo
1,2,
Letícia Ferreira de Sousa
1,
Lucas Loram Lourenço
1 and
Layara Alexandre Bessa
1,2
1
Laboratory of Metabolism and Genetics of Biodiversity, Instituto Federal Goiano, Rio Verde Campus, Highway Sul Goiana, Km 01, Rio Verde 75901-970, GO, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Instituto Federal Goiano, Rio Verde Campus, Rio Verde 75901-970, GO, Brazil
3
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais—EPAMIG Sudeste, Campo Experimental Vale do Piranga, Highway Luiz Martins Soares, Km 05, Zona Rural, P.O. Box 01, Oratórios 35439-000, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2680; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122680
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 20 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 November 2025 / Published: 25 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Studies of Microorganisms in Plant Growth and Utilization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Efficient biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is crucial for sustainable soybean productivity. Current strategies involve the use of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens and co-inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria like Azospirillum brasilense. To further optimize BNF and plant performance, we investigated the effect of co-inoculation with A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens combined with the strategic application of the micronutrients Molybdenum (Mo), Cobalt (Co), and Nickel (Ni) on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions. We evaluated plant growth, photosynthetic parameters, accumulation of N, nitrate reductase activity, and nifH gene expression at the R1 reproductive stage. Our main finding was that the co-inoculation combined with the simultaneous application of Mo, Co, and Ni significantly maximized vegetative growth, photochemical efficiency, and BNF. Specifically, this triple supplementation increased nifH gene expression (0.22) compared to the inoculated control (0.003), leading to a substantial enhancement of photosynthetic parameters, including photosystem II (PSII) efficiency and net carbon assimilation (A). For example, the total dry mass was 14.36 g in the Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY combination and 6.50 g in the non-inoculated and non-micronutrient-treated plants. The total N content was also higher in the plants treated with Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY (73.20 g kg−1). Crucially, the data also demonstrated that excessive levels of Co impaired the symbiosis, underscoring the necessity of precise dose management. These results confirm the strong synergistic potential of combining microbial co-inoculation with targeted mineral nutrition as a high-impact, sustainable strategy for boosting soybean productivity.

1. Introduction

Sustainable agricultural practices, such as the use of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms, have been widely adopted worldwide as alternatives to reduce the reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers [1,2]. Diazotrophic strains selected for their high efficiency in converting atmospheric nitrogen to NH3 have become indispensable in the context of biotechnological advancements in agriculture. In the realm of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), most commercial biofertilizers are based on Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. [3,4]. These microorganisms colonize the roots of major crops, such as soybeans, enhancing development, growth, and productivity [5,6,7].
Soybean establishes symbiosis with Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum because these bacteria express genes of the nif complex, which are essential for BNF [8,9]. Studies indicate that co-inoculation of these bacteria is an effective strategy for improving crop productivity [10]. Furthermore, co-inoculation in combination with micronutrients has been suggested as an important management practice to increase soybean yield [11]. Given that molybdenum (Mo), cobalt (Co), and nickel (Ni) are critical components of the symbiotic process, necessary for activation or synthesis of BNF-related enzymes [12,13,14], we hypothesized that co-inoculation of soybean with A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens in combination with Mo, Co, and Ni could enhance plant physiological performance, resulting in improved growth.
In soybeans, diazotrophic bacteria act either in the nodules (Bradyrhizobium) or in the rhizosphere (Azospirillum) [3]. Within nodules, Co is involved in cobalamin-dependent synthesis of leghemoglobin [15]. Meanwhile, diazotrophic bacteria utilize Mo, iron (Fe), ATP, and protons (H+) to convert atmospheric N2 into ammonia via nitrogenase, which cleaves the N≡N triple bond to generate NH3 and H2 [12,16,17,18]. Ni serves as a cofactor in hydrogenase, which recycles H2 produced during nitrogenase activity; excess H2 can compete with N2 at the nitrogenase active site, potentially inhibiting BNF [13,19].
The NH3 produced is protonated to NH4+ and subsequently converted into ureides (allantoin and allantoic acid), which are transported via the xylem to the leaves [20,21,22]. In the leaves, ureides are catabolized through the purine degradation pathway into urea, which is hydrolyzed by urease, a Ni-dependent enzyme, producing NH3 and CO2 that are incorporated into amino acids and proteins [23,24].
Molybdenum (Mo) also acts as a component of several essential enzymes for functional and metabolic processes, such as xanthine oxidoreductase, aldehyde oxidase, and sulfite oxidase [25,26]. Mo homeostasis in plant cells is strictly controlled, suggesting a vital role in plant adaptation to local environments [27]. Additionally, cobalamin-dependent enzymes have been observed in plants, such as peroxidases, leucine 2,3-aminomutase, and methylmalonyl-CoA mutase, reinforcing the relevance of Co [28].
Thus, studies show that the micronutrients Co, Mo, and Ni are important in biochemical processes that extend beyond BNF. The management of Ni in agricultural systems, in turn, has emerged as a promising and low-cost strategy to enhance productivity and sustainability in soybean cultivation by improving nitrogen metabolism through enzymes like urease and NiFe-hydrogenase and optimizing calcium uptake as well as the efficiency of water and nutrient use by plants [29]. This micronutrient focus is crucial because soybean is a legume that produces high-protein grains, making it vital in combating global food insecurity [30]. Soybean is the world’s leading oilseed crop and ranks among the top five food crops globally [31]. Currently, soybeans are cultivated across $122.10 million hectares, yielding an annual production of $353 million metric tons (MT) and boasting a productivity rate of $28.00 quintals per hectare, with Brazil and the USA as the leading producers [32]. Nevertheless, its high yield is intrinsically linked to an adequate N supply [33], which motivates the continuous search for new technologies that stimulate BNF in the nodules or rhizosphere.
Recent studies have demonstrated that the co-inoculation of soybean with A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens, when associated with the supply of Mo and Co and the use of cell protectants, can result in a greater number of pods per plant [34]. However, despite these benefits, the micronutrients also have a flip side. The work by Silveira et al. [35] showed that high doses of Mo and Co applied to soybeans can be toxic to the Bradyrhizobium genus, negatively impacting the crop’s agronomic characteristics. Conversely, the study by Barbosa et al. [11] indicated that the foliar application of A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens co-inoculation increased soybean yield by 10% in plants fertilized with Co and Mo. In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the effects of different formulations containing Mo, Co, and Ni in combination with A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens on soybean growth, nodulation, physiological performance, tissue nitrogen accumulation, and BNF activity via nifH gene expression in nodules. The study seeks to provide an alternative to conventional nitrogen fertilization, promoting improved agricultural management and production efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Inoculants, and Experimental Conditions

The experiment was conducted at the Plant Biotechnology Complex of the Instituto Federal Goiano–Campus Rio Verde, located at 17°48′15.9″ S and 50°54′19.5″ W. A randomized complete block design was employed, with treatments applied in 3 L pots and five replicates per treatment. Each pot contained two plants, which together constituted a single experimental unit. Soybean seeds of the cultivar Bônus 8579 RSF IPRO were used. Prior to planting, the soil was analyzed for chemical and nutritional properties (Table 1), and soil acidity was corrected with 2000 kg ha−1 of dolomitic limestone (28% CaO + 14.5% MgO).
The bacterial strains used in this experiment were obtained from the Simple Verde® strain bank (Simple Agro Corporation, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil) and provided at an initial concentration of 108 CFU mL−1. The inoculants and micronutrients were applied in the planting furrow, just above the seed. The seeds were de-infested superficially for the removal of the epiphytes through repeated rinses under running water, followed by agitation in water and neutral detergent at 70 rpm for 10 min. After successive rinses, the seeds were immersed in 70% ethanol for 1 min, sodium hypochlorite (2.5% of active chlorine) for 5 min, and then 70% ethanol for 30 s, followed by three rinses with autoclaved distilled water. Subsequently, soybean seeds were sown in furrows positioned at the center of each pot, and the recommended volumes of biological inoculants were applied using a volumetric pipette: 200 mL ha−1 for A. brasilense and 200 mL ha−1 for B. diazoefficiens. In the co-inoculation treatments, the same volumes were maintained for each rhizobacterium. Micronutrients were applied in different combinations (Table 2) using a volumetric pipette: 30 g ha−1 of ammonium molybdate (Mo), 3 g ha−1 of cobalt sulfate (Co), and 30 g ha−1 of nickel sulfate (Ni). To mitigate the risk of toxicity, we opted to use Mo and Co doses corresponding to approximately 60% of the recommendation established by the Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo (CQFS) [36]. These doses were defined based on the quantities of ammonium molybdate and cobalt sulfate tested, respectively, in the studies by Picazeviz et al. [37] and Marcondes and Caires [38]. Regarding Ni, the dose used was determined based on the work by Lavres et al. [19]. Control plants received no micronutrients, with or without rhizobacterial inoculation. All pots were maintained in a greenhouse, monitored daily, and watered according to plant requirements. All biometric, physiological, and nitrogen content analyses were performed on five replicates of each treatment, with each replicate consisting of two plants per pot.

2.2. Biometric Evaluations and Nodulation

Data were collected for plant height (cm), stem diameter (cm), shoot dry mass (g), root dry mass (g), total dry mass (g), and nodule number. Evaluations were performed at the R1 phenological stage, corresponding to the period of maximum nodulation in soybean. For nodulation assessment, roots were carefully washed under running water, and nodules were counted per plant. Shoots were separated from roots, and both plant parts were placed in paper bags and dried in a forced-air oven at 65 °C until constant weight was achieved. Subsequently, shoot and root dry mass were measured using a precision balance, and results were expressed as g plant−1.

2.3. Physiological Assessments

All physiological evaluations were performed at the R1 stage, using the third fully expanded leaf counted from the apical meristem toward the base of the plant. Photosynthetic pigment content was assessed with a portable chlorophyll meter (ClorofiLOG CFL1030, Falker®, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil), determining chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll indices, expressed as the Falker chlorophyll index (FCI).
Transient chlorophyll a fluorescence (OJIP) was measured using a portable FluorPen FP 100 fluorometer (Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech Republic). Leaves were dark-adapted for 30 min to ensure complete oxidation of the photosynthetic electron transport system. Subsequently, leaves were exposed to a 3000 µmol m−2 s−1 pulse of blue light, and fluorescence was recorded at: F0 (50 µs, all PSII reaction centers open, O-step), J (2 ms), I (30 ms), and FM (all PSII reaction centers closed, P-step). These measurements were used to calculate several PSII bioenergetic parameters following Strasser et al. [39], including: specific flux of light absorption per reaction center (ABS/RC); energy flux trapped per reaction center at t = 0 (TR0/RC); electron transport flux per reaction center (ET0/RC); specific flux of energy dissipation at the antenna chlorophylls (DI0/RC); maximum PSII quantum efficiency (FV/FM); and the photosynthetic performance index (PI_Abs), reflecting the overall energy conversion from light absorption to plastoquinone reduction.
Gas exchange measurements were performed between 07:00 and 10:00 a.m. using an infrared gas analyzer coupled with a fluorometer (LI-6800xt, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The following parameters were determined: net carbon assimilation rate (A, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1), transpiration rate (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, µmol m−2 s−1), and stomatal conductance (Gsw, mol H2O m−2 s−1).

2.4. N Content and Nitrate Reductase (NR, EC 1.6.6.1) Activity

At the R1 growth stage, soybean plants were sampled for nitrogen content analysis. Shoots (leaves and stems) and roots were separated and dried in a forced-air oven at 65 °C until constant weight. The dried material was then ground using a Willey-type mill (R-TE-650/1, Tecnal, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil). Total nitrogen content was determined following the methodology described by Malavolta et al. [40].
Leaf samples were also collected at R1 and immediately stored at −80 °C for the determination of nitrate reductase (NR) activity, according to the procedure described by Hageman and Reed [41]. For enzyme extraction, 0.2 g of fresh leaf tissue was homogenized with 2 mL of extraction buffer composed of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 30 nM KNO3, and 2% (v/v) propanol. The samples were vacuum-infiltrated for 5 min, and a 1 mL aliquot was taken to measure the initial nitrite concentration. Another 1 mL aliquot was incubated in a water bath at 31 °C for 1 h. After incubation, the samples were filtered, and the reaction mixture was prepared by adding 1 mL of the filtrate to a colorimetric reagent containing 1% sulfanilamide and 0.02% N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, prepared in 1.5 M and 0.2 M HCl, respectively. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Barueri, SP, Brazil). Nitrate reductase activity was quantified against a standard curve prepared with NO2− (0–20 µg mL−1) and expressed as µg NO2− h−1 mg−1 fresh weight (FW).

2.5. nifH Gene Expression Levels

Total RNA was extracted from individual root nodule samples of each treatment using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 10 µL of DNA-free RNA in a 20 µL reaction volume using the Power SYBR Green RT-PCR Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The resulting cDNA was subsequently used as a template for quantitative RT-PCR analyses. For amplification of the target gene nifH, reactions were performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) with gene-specific primers: forward 5′-CATACATCGCCATCATCTCG-3′ and reverse 5′-ATCAAGCTCGGCTACAAGGA-3′. Each 20 µL PCR reaction contained 10 µL of SYBR Green Master Mix, 0.6 µL of each primer, 1 µL of cDNA, and 7.8 µL of sterile water. Relative expression levels of nifH were normalized to the constitutive recA gene.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effects of different combinations of Mo, Co, and Ni with the rhizobacteria A. brasilense (AZO) and B. diazoefficiens (BRADY), totaling 25 treatments. When significant differences were detected, means were compared using the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). Additionally, the individual effect of each treatment was compared with the overall control (uninoculated plants without micronutrient supplementation) using Dunnett’s test (p < 0.05). Multivariate patterns among variables were explored through Canonical Variable Analysis (CVA) using the multivariate analysis package [42] to identify the canonical axes explaining the total variance. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated and visualized with the corrplot package [43]. All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.5.1 [44].

3. Results

Overall, soybean plant height was not significantly influenced by the nutritional and inoculation treatments. However, plants treated with the combination Mo + Co + AZO + BRADY exhibited greater average height (54.60 cm) compared to the total control (41.80 cm) (Figure 1a). Stem diameter, in contrast, was significantly affected by the treatments. Plants receiving Co + AZO + BRADY developed the smallest average diameters (0.33 cm), whereas those treated with Mo + Co + AZO, Co + Ni + AZO, and the complete formulation Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY showed greater stem diameters (0.57, 0.57, and 0.59 cm, respectively) than the total control (Figure 1b).
Shoot dry mass was highest in plants subjected to the complete treatment (Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY), with an average of 10.85 g per plant (Figure 1c). In contrast, plants from the total control accumulated the lowest shoot dry mass (4.87 g). The combination Co + AZO + BRADY also resulted in reduced biomass accumulation, with the lowest mean value observed (2.53 g). Root development, however, was enhanced in plants treated with Mo + Co + AZO, Mo + AZO + BRADY, and Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY, with average root dry masses of 3.48, 3.56, and 3.51 g, respectively, all of which were higher than that of the total control (1.63 g) (Figure 1d).
The data on total dry mass corroborated the trends observed for shoot dry mass, with plants subjected to the complete treatment (Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY) accumulating the highest total biomass (14.36 g) (Figure 2a). This treatment was followed by Mo + BRADY, Mo + Co + Ni + BRADY, and Mo + AZO + BRADY, with mean total dry masses of 11.30, 10.68, and 11.10 g, respectively. These results suggest that the presence of B. diazoefficiens enhances the utilization of micronutrients by soybean plants. In general, plants from the total control exhibited lower total dry mass (6.50 g), whereas the lowest values were recorded for those treated with Co + AZO + BRADY (3.86 g). Regarding nodule formation, plants grown without micronutrient supplementation but co-inoculated with A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens (Control + AZO + BRADY) produced the highest number of nodules (75), followed by those treated with Mo + Co + BRADY (71) (Figure 2b). The total control plants exhibited a reduced number of nodules (10), while the Co + AZO + BRADY treatment resulted in the lowest mean value (4.4).
The chlorophyll a index was not significantly affected by either the nutritional or inoculation treatments and did not differ from that of the total control (Figure 2c). However, the chlorophyll b index was significantly higher only in plants receiving the complete treatment (Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY), reaching 13.60 FCI (Figure 2d).
The total chlorophyll index followed the same trend observed for chlorophyll a, showing no significant effect of treatments compared with the total control (Figure 3a). The chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters indicated that the average specific light absorption flux per reaction center (ABS/RC) was lower than that of the total control in plants receiving the complete treatment (2.55) (Figure 3b). Conversely, the average energy flux trapped per reaction center (TR0/RC) was reduced only in plants treated with Control + AZO (2.02) compared with the control (Figure 3c). In contrast, plants subjected to the complete treatment exhibited a higher electron transport flux per reaction center (ET0/RC) (1.20) relative to the total control (0.85) (Figure 3d). Similar responses were observed in plants treated with Mo + Co + Ni + AZO, Control + BRADY, Mo + Ni + BRADY, Control + AZO + BRADY, Mo + AZO + BRADY, Ni + AZO + BRADY, Mo + Ni + AZO + BRADY, and Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY. These findings suggest that inoculation of Glycine max with B. diazoefficiens, either alone or in combination with micronutrients or the rhizobacterium A. brasilense, can enhance the photochemical performance of soybean plants.
The data on the specific energy dissipation flux at the chlorophyll level of the antenna complex (DI0/RC) reinforce the evidence that plants receiving the complete treatment (Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY) achieved greater photochemical stability, as indicated by the lowest average values for this parameter (0.55) (Figure 4a). Similar results were observed in plants treated with Ni + AZO. In contrast, plants treated with Co + AZO exhibited the highest averages (1.30), suggesting the occurrence of photochemical stress. The average ratio representing the maximum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) was higher than and statistically different from that of the total control only in plants subjected to the complete treatment (0.80) (Figure 4b).
Overall, the photosynthetic performance index (PI_Abs) was low in plants from the total control (0.65), while higher values were observed in plants treated with the complete formulation (1.78), as well as in those subjected to Control + AZO, Ni + AZO, Co + Ni + AZO, Mo + Co + Ni + AZO, Mo + Ni + BRADY, Control + AZO + BRADY, Mo + AZO + BRADY, Ni + AZO + BRADY, and Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY (Figure 4c). Regarding the net carbon assimilation rate (A), plants under the complete treatment (31.37 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) showed higher and significantly different averages compared with the total control (24.76 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1). Similar trends were also observed in plants treated with Co + AZO, Mo + Ni + AZO, Mo + Co + Ni + AZO, and Ni + BRADY.
In general, inoculation and co-inoculation treatments did not differ significantly from the total control with respect to transpiration (E). Notably, very low transpiration rates were observed only in plants treated with Mo + BRADY (0.011 mmol H2O m−2 s−1) (Figure 5a). Conversely, internal CO2 concentration (Ci) tended to decrease in most treatments compared with the total control, with the lowest Ci values recorded in plants treated with Mo + Ni + AZO and Mo + BRADY (289.27 and 285.25 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1, respectively) (Figure 5b). As expected, stomatal conductance (Gsw) was reduced in treatments that showed low E and Ci values. Accordingly, plants subjected to Mo + BRADY exhibited the lowest average Gsw (0.63 mol H2O m−2 s−1) (Figure 5c).
The N content in the shoot was positively influenced by the treatment of soybean plants with the combination of the three evaluated micronutrients and B. diazoefficiens (Mo + Co + Ni + BRADY), as well as by the complete treatment, which also included A. brasilense (Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY). Plants subjected to these treatments showed higher average shoot N contents (43.10 and 48.73 g kg−1, respectively) compared to those grown without micronutrient application and without inoculation (29.97 g kg−1).
In the roots, the highest nitrogen contents were observed in most treatments that combined micronutrients with B. diazoefficiens and co-inoculation with A. brasilense (AZO + BRADY) (Figure 6a), reinforcing the importance of using B. diazoefficiens as an agronomic strategy to enhance N acquisition by G. max. The evaluation of total N content, however, demonstrated the superiority of the complete treatment in increasing N availability to the plants. The highest total N averages were recorded in plants under this treatment (73.20 g kg−1), which were significantly higher than those observed in the other treatments overall (Figure 6b).
Nitrate reductase activity in leaves was higher than that observed in the total control for most of the nutritional and inoculation treatments (Figure 6c), suggesting that different combinations of Mo, Co, and Ni can stimulate not only N assimilation but also N metabolism pathways in G. max. Regarding the relative expression of the nifH gene in nodules, activity was close to zero in the total control plants. In contrast, treatments containing BRADY, with or without AZO, tended to increase gene expression. The Mo + Co + BRADY treatment showed moderate expression levels (0.10), whereas the complete treatment resulted in the highest average nifH expression (0.22) (Figure 6d).
The canonical axes explained 91.5% of the total variation in the dataset. Canonical variate analysis revealed that the complete treatment had a positive influence on nifH gene expression, stem diameter, shoot dry mass, root dry mass, chlorophyll b index, carbon assimilation rate (A), and total leaf N content (Figure 7a). In contrast, this treatment negatively influenced the ABS/RC and DI0/RC parameters, which were associated with higher Fv/Fm values, indicating improved photochemical efficiency.
Pearson’s correlation analysis showed a positive association between nifH gene expression and several growth parameters, including plant height, shoot dry mass, and root dry mass. As expected, nifH expression was also positively correlated with both shoot and root N concentrations (Figure 7b).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Combined Application of the Micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni, Together with the Co-Inoculation of A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens, Enhances the Vegetative Growth of G. max

Studies indicate that co-inoculation of B. diazoefficiens and A. brasilense enhances symbiotic efficiency in biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and the agronomic benefits of this interaction have been validated on a large scale by farmers worldwide [7]. This synergistic effect is attributed to the ecological compatibility of these species [3,45,46] and their occupation of complementary niches. B. diazoefficiens is highly efficient in root nodule formation and atmospheric nitrogen fixation [47], whereas A. brasilense promotes root development through the production of phytohormones, particularly indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), thereby expanding the plant’s nutrient and water uptake capacity [48,49]. This synergistic interaction enhances BNF, likely improving nitrogen assimilation by plant tissues and resulting in higher accumulated N, especially in the roots [50].
Our findings corroborate those of Chibeba et al. [51], who reported that co-inoculation of A. brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. increased both shoot and root biomass in soybean plants compared to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. alone. Similarly, Bazzo et al. [52] observed that co-inoculation of G. max with B. japonicum and A. brasilense improved vegetative growth parameters, including shoot dry mass, root biomass, and root length. This growth promotion is attributed to the functional complementarity of the two microorganisms: A. brasilense produces phytohormones such as auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins, which directly stimulate root development, while Bradyrhizobium expresses genes involved in nodulation [53,54,55].
Root growth is accompanied by the exudation of flavonoids that activate the Bradyrhizobium nodD gene. This, in turn, stimulates the production of Nod factors, which are molecular signals that induce morphological changes in plant roots, such as nodule formation and root hair curling—processes essential for bacterial colonization [56]. The synergistic interaction between Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum promotes earlier and more effective nodulation [57] while also enhancing nitrogenase activity in the nodules, thereby increasing nitrogen supply to the plant. Consequently, this leads to improved growth, productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency, making co-inoculation an agronomically advantageous and environmentally sustainable practice [58].
Co-inoculation, combined with supplementation of Mo, Co, and Ni, ensured high efficiency of BNF. Mo availability is critical for BNF because it functions as a cofactor for the molybdoenzyme nitrogenase, which catalyzes the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), the assimilable form of nitrogen for plants [21,26,59,60]. Molybdenum (Mo) plays a significant role in the formation of the metalloenzyme mARC (mitochondrial amidoxime-reducing component), and studies suggest that mARC may be involved in nitric oxide (NO) homeostasis. This occurs either through the reduction of NO precursors [61] or by acting as a nitrite-dependent nitric oxide synthase, meaning it catalyzes a one-electron reduction of nitrite to NO. This latter function is particularly relevant for nitrogen metabolism [62].
For the genus Rhizobium, NO production occurs during the symbiosis with legumes, spanning from the initial interaction through to the formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules [63,64]. Signorelli et al. [65] investigated the role of NO in this legume–rhizobia symbiosis and inferred that, although this reactive species can potentially reduce nitrogenase activity, NO exerts positive effects on BNF. Notably, the negative effects of NO require direct interaction with nitrogenase, while the positive effects are linked to signaling functions that can amplify beneficial processes.
Similarly, Co, though required in trace amounts, is essential for BNF as it is a constituent of cobalamin [15,66]. In Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species, cobalamin-dependent enzymes such as methionine synthase, methylmalonyl-CoA mutase, and ribonucleotide reductase play key roles in nodulation and nitrogen fixation [28]. Co deficiency significantly impairs methionine synthase activity, reducing methionine biosynthesis, which subsequently limits protein synthesis and results in smaller bacteroids [67]. Similarly, methylmalonyl-CoA mutase catalyzes the production of leghemoglobin, and Co limitation directly reduces leghemoglobin synthesis, thereby decreasing nitrogen fixation and limiting N supply to the plant. Leghemoglobin functions to protect nitrogenase from oxygen, so its shortage compromises nitrogenase activity [68]. Ribonucleotide reductase catalyzes the reduction of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides, a rate-limiting step in DNA synthesis and, consequently, in cell division and growth [69]. Ni, in turn, activates urease in leaves, an enzyme responsible for metabolizing nitrogenous compounds such as ureides, which, upon breakdown, maximize nitrogen assimilation in soybean plants [70,71].
The Co + Ni + BRADY and Co + AZO + BRADY treatments, however, reduced shoot dry mass and total dry mass of G. max. Although micronutrient supplementation in combination with rhizobacteria can enhance legume growth, excessive Co can disrupt symbiosis, impair BNF, and cause biomass losses. Barbosa et al. [11] reported that co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum, combined with high doses of Co and Mo, decreased BNF efficiency and compromised plant development. Other studies indicate that elevated Co concentrations interfere with bacteroid differentiation and functionality within root nodules, reducing nitrogen-fixing capacity while generating oxidative stress, reducing metabolic efficiency, and ultimately limiting plant growth [26,72].
High doses of micronutrients such as Mo, Co and Ni are potentially toxic to soybean crops due to multiple mechanisms. These elements induce oxidative stress and damage membranes and proteins [73]. Additionally, high concentrations of these metals can result in nutritional antagonism, blocking the absorption and transport of other essential nutrients [26]. Specifically in soybeans, an excess of these micronutrients in the sowing zone is phytotoxic to the seedling [74] and, crucially, to Bradyrhizobium in the symbiotic system, impairing inoculant survival and inducing evident epigenetic toxicity in the plants [75], which severely affects the crop’s agronomic and physiological parameters. Conversely, it is also important to note that these micronutrients, if applied in high quantities to the soybean crop, can be translocated to the grains and subsequently disseminated to higher levels of the food chain, posing a risk of toxicity to both animals and humans [76,77].

4.2. The Combined Application of the Micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni, Together with Co-Inoculation of A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens, Enhances the Primary Photochemical Performance of G. max

The Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY combination promoted higher efficiency values for Fv/Fm, ET0/RC, and PI_ABS while reducing photochemical stress parameters (ABS/RC and DI0/RC), suggesting that this treatment optimizes the use of absorbed light energy, mitigates stress in PSII, and enhances energy availability for plant growth and development. Oliveira et al. [78] demonstrated that Mo improves photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism in soybean and maize, enhancing PSII efficiency and nitrogen assimilation. Adequate Co levels also play an antioxidant role, reducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [28,79], which protects PSII from oxidative damage and enables optimized electron transport, as reflected by higher ET0/RC values in plants subjected to the complete treatment [80]. The observed decrease in DI0/RC further corroborates this protection, indicating reduced energy dissipation as heat, which is critical for maximizing the use of light energy [81,82].
The complete treatment also stimulated the accumulation of chlorophyll b in the leaves of G. max. Chlorophyll b complements chlorophyll a by aiding in light absorption [83]. This increase may be linked to greater nitrogen availability due to more efficient nitrogen fixation by bacteroids under the complete treatment, which favors the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments and PSII-associated proteins [84,85]. Similarly, in gas exchange measurements, the Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY combination resulted in significantly higher CO2 assimilation rates compared to the control, reflecting improved photosynthetic efficiency supported by enhanced light capture via chlorophyll b [86,87].

4.3. Mo, Co, and Ni Optimize Co-Inoculation, Increasing the Expression of the Gene nifH and BNF in Soybean Nodules

Nitrogen (N) is essential for plant growth and energy metabolism, being a constituent of key macromolecules such as amino acids, proteins, chlorophylls, and nucleic acids [88]. In soybean plants subjected to the complete treatment, supplementation with essential micronutrients (Mo, Co, and Ni) was crucial for maximizing nitrogen metabolism efficiency. Molybdenum and iron are essential for nitrogenase functionality, with Mo forming part of the active site responsible for reducing N2 to NH3 [89]. Nickel acts as a cofactor for urease, facilitating efficient N recycling in leaves; its deficiency impairs nitrogen assimilation and can indirectly reduce BNF via a “feedback effect” [90]. Cobalt (Co), in turn, supports nitrogenase activity and regulates energy metabolism in symbiotic microorganisms. It acts by promoting leghemoglobin synthesis, thereby protecting the nitrogenase enzyme against oxygen inactivation [91].
Plants inoculated solely with A. brasilense generally exhibited lower tissue N levels, as expected based on the bacterium’s mechanism of action. While B. diazoefficiens fixes atmospheric N directly via nitrogenase within root nodules [47], A. brasilense acts indirectly, stimulating root growth through phytohormone production and contributing to BNF in the rhizosphere [92,93].
The combined Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY treatment enhanced nifH gene expression in soybean nodules, with expression positively correlated with plant height, shoot dry mass, and root dry mass. The nifH gene encodes the dinitrogenase reductase subunit, a central component of the nitrogenase complex, and is widely used as a molecular marker for BNF [94,95]. Thus, an adequate supply of essential micronutrients, together with the synergistic interaction between A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens, establishes optimal biochemical conditions for nifH induction and maintenance, enhancing BNF efficiency, improving physiological processes, and positively affecting plant growth and productivity.

5. Conclusions

Our results confirm the hypothesis that the combined application of the micronutrients Mo + Co + Ni, together with the co-inoculation of A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens, significantly enhances vegetative growth, photochemical efficiency, and BNF in soybean plants. This treatment stimulated nifH gene expression, a key marker of BNF, resulting in improved N assimilation and enhanced photosynthetic performance, including increased PSII efficiency and net carbon assimilation (A). However, the data also indicate that excessive application of certain micronutrients, particularly Co, can impair symbiosis and reduce plant growth, underscoring the importance of proper dose management. These findings highlight the agronomic potential of integrating co-inoculation with targeted mineral supplementation as a strategy for sustainable soybean production. To promote environmentally responsible cultivation of G. max, further research is warranted to optimize micronutrient doses and combinations, evaluate their effects across diverse soils, climates, and soybean genotypes, and ultimately maximize BNF efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.V., L.A.B. and M.A.M.; methodology, L.C.V. and M.A.M.; validation, L.C.V. and M.N.O.R.; formal analysis, M.N.O.R. and A.S.M.; investigation, L.F.d.S. and L.L.L.; resources, M.N.O.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.O.R.; writing—review and editing, L.C.V.; visualization, L.C.V.; supervision, L.A.B.; project administration and funding acquisition, L.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data relevant to this manuscript are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG) for funding multiple research projects conducted by this study group. We also thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for providing productivity scholarships to researchers L.V. and L.B., as well as a doctoral scholarship to M.N.O.R. Our gratitude extends to the Instituto Federal Goiano, Rio Verde Campus, for providing the necessary infrastructure. Finally, we sincerely thank the students who contributed to the successful completion of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Soumare, A.; Diedhiou, A.G.; Thuita, M.; Hafidi, M.; Ouhdouch, Y.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Kouisni, L. Exploiting biological nitrogen fixation: A route towards a sustainable agriculture. Plants 2020, 9, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zilli, J.É.; Alves, B.J.R.; Rouws, L.F.M.; Simões-Araujo, J.L.; de Barros Soares, L.H.; Cassán, F.; Castellanos, M.O.; O’Hara, G. The importance of denitrification performed by nitrogen-fixing bacteria used as inoculants in South America. Plant Soil 2020, 451, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hungria, M.; Nogueira, M.A.; Araujo, R.S. Soybean seed co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense: A new biotechnological tool to improve yield and sustainability. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Garcia, M.V.C.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Combining microorganisms in inoculants is agronomically important but industrially challenging: Case study of a composite inoculant containing Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum for the soybean crop. AMB Expr. 2021, 11, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marks, B.B.; Megías, M.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Biotechnological potential of rhizobial metabolites to enhance the performance of Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense inoculants with soybean and maize. AMB Expr. 2013, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rondina, A.B.L.; dos Santos Sanzovo, A.W.; Guimarães, G.S.; Wendling, J.R.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Changes in root morphological traits in soybean co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense or treated with A. brasilense exudates. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2020, 56, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prando, A.M.; Barbosa, J.Z.; de Oliveira, A.B.; Nogueira, M.A.; Possamai, E.J.; Hungria, M. Benefits of soybean co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense: Large-scale validation with farmers in Brazil. Eur. J. Agron. 2024, 155, 127112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Figueiredo, M.V.B.; Mergulhão, A.C.E.S.; Sobral, J.K.; Lira Junior, M.A.; Araújo, A.S.F. Biological nitrogen fixation: Importance, associated diversity, and estimates. In Plant Microbe Symbiosis: Fundamentals and Advances; Arora, N., Ed.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2013; pp. 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saha, B.; Saha, S.; Das, A.; Bhattacharyya, P.K.; Basak, N.; Sinha, A.K.; Poddar, P. Biological nitrogen fixation for sustainable agriculture. In Agriculturally Important Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture: Volume 2: Applications in Crop Production and Protection; Meena, V., Mishra, P., Bisht, J., Pattanayak, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 81–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fachinelli, R.; Ceccon, G. Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum coinoculation in soybean in succession to safrinha corn in sandy and clay soil. Acta Iguazu 2020, 9, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barbosa, H.M.; Alvarez, R.D.C.F.; Lima, S.F.D.; Cordeiro, M.A.S.; Zanella, M.S.; Bernardo, V.F. Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum co-inoculation associated with cobalt and molybdenum application in the soybean crop. Ciênc. Rural 2022, 53, e20210871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bonilla, I.; Bolaños, L. Mineral nutrition for legume–rhizobia symbiosis: B, Ca, N, P, S, K, Fe, Mo, Co, and Ni: A review. In Organic Farming, Pest Control and Remediation of Soil Pollutants. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Lichtfouse, E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 253–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weisany, W.; Raei, Y.; Allahverdipoor, K.H. Role of some mineral nutrients in biological nitrogen fixation. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2013, 2, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lima, E.G.; Zanuzo, M.R.; Vieira, C.V.; Pelissari, F.; de Andrade Coimbra, R. Effect of nickel seed treatment in soybeans. Sci. Electron. Arch. 2024, 17, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, X.; Wei, X.; Ling, J.; Chen, J. Cobalt in plant life: Responses and deficiency symptoms. In Beneficial Chemical Elements of Plants: Recent Developments and Future Prospects; Pandey, S., Tripathi, D.K., Singh, V.P., Sharma, S., Chauhan, D.K., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 182–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fatima, P.; Mishra, A.; Om, H.; Saha, B.; Kumar, P. Free living nitrogen fixation and their response to agricultural crops. In Biofertilizers and Biopesticides in Sustainable Agriculture; Kaushik, B.D., Kumar, D., Shamim, M., Eds.; Apple Academic Press: Waretown, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 173–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verma, D.K.; Kaur, B.; Pandey, A.K.; Asthir, B. Nitrogenase: A key enzyme in microbial nitrogen fixation for soil health. In Microbiology for Sustainable Agriculture, Soil Health, and Environmental Protection; Verma, D.K., Ed.; Apple Academic Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 261–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fenice, M. The nitrogen cycle: An overview. In Nitrogen Cycle; Gonzalez-Lopez, J., Gonzalez-Martinez, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lavres, J.; Castro Franco, G.; de Sousa Câmara, G.M. Soybean seed treatment with nickel improves biological nitrogen fixation and urease activity. Front. Environ. Sci. 2016, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Izaguirre-Mayoral, M.L.; Lazarovits, G.; Baral, B. Ureide metabolism in plant-associated bacteria: Purine plant-bacteria interactive scenarios under nitrogen deficiency. Plant Soil 2018, 428, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumari, R.; Bhatnagar, S.; Kalra, C. Nitrogen assimilation in plants. In Advances in Plant Nitrogen Metabolism; Yousuf, P.Y., Shabir, P.A., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 38–54. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lal, M.A.; Bhatla, S.C. Nitrogen metabolism. In Plant Physiology, Development and Metabolism; Bhatla, S.C., Lal, M.A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 295–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matiz, A.; Mioto, P.T.; Mercier, H. Urea in plants: Metabolic aspects and ecological implications. In Progress in Botany; Cánovas, F., Lüttge, U., Leuschner, C., Risueño, M.C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 81, pp. 157–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ono, Y.; Fukasawa, M.; Sueyoshi, K.; Ohtake, N.; Sato, T.; Tanabata, S.; Toyota, R.; Higuchi, K.; Saito, A.; Ohyama, T. Application of nitrate, ammonium, or urea changes the concentrations of ureides, urea, amino acids and other metabolites in xylem sap and in the organs of soybean plants (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rana, M.; Sankhyan, N.K.; Thakur, P.; Babal, B.; Anjali; Sharma, S.; Kumari, S.; Kumar, P. Molybdenum in soil-plant system: Bioavailability, dynamics and implications for sustainable crop production. Discov. Soil 2025, 2, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Roychoudhury, A.; Chakraborty, S. Cobalt and molybdenum: Deficiency, toxicity, and nutritional role in plant growth and development. In Plant Nutrition and Food Security in the Era of Climate Change; Kumar, V., Srivastava, A.K., Suprasanna, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, X.Y.; Hu, D.W.; Zhao, F.J. Molybdenum: More than an essential element. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 1766–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hu, X.; Wei, X.; Ling, J.; Chen, J. Cobalt: An essential micronutrient for plant growth? Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 768523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rabinovich, A.; Di, R.; Lindert, S.; Heckman, J. Nickel and soil fertility: Review of benefits to environment and food security. Environments 2024, 11, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dilawari, R.; Kaur, N.; Priyadarshi, N.; Prakash, I.; Patra, A.; Mehta, S.; Singh, B.; Jain, P.; Islam, M.A. Soybean: A key player for global food security. In Soybean Improvement: Physiological, Molecular and Genetic Perspectives; Wani, S.H., ul Rehman Sofi, N., Bhat, M.A., Lin, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Islam, M.S.; Muhyidiyn, I.; Islam, M.R.; Hasan, M.K.; Hafeez, A.G.; Hosen, M.M.; Saneoka, H.; Ueda, A.; Liu, L.; Naz, M.; et al. Soybean and sustainable agriculture for food security. In Soybean—Recent Advances in Research and Applications; Ohyama, T., Takahashi, Y., Ohtake, N., Sato, T., Tanabata, S., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumari, S.; Dambale, A.S.; Samantara, R.; Jincy, M.; Bains, G. Introduction, history, geographical distribution, importance, and uses of soybean (Glycine max L.). In Soybean Production Technology; Singh, K.P., Singh, N.K., Aravind, T., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bhangu, R.; Virk, H.K. Nitrogen management in soybean: A review. Agric. Rev. 2019, 40, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Almeida, L.H.C.; Nadur, M.A.; de Almeida, P.P.S.; Carrilho, E.M.; Ventura, M.U.; de Freitas Fregonezi, G.A. Cell protector, cobalt, and molybdenum in association with Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum in soybean cultivation. Obs. Econ. Latinoam. 2025, 23, e9033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silveira, P.G.; da Silva, E.A.R.; Nakao, A.H.; de Carvalho, J.B. Efeito de doses de cobalto e molibdênio aplicadas no sulco de plantio da soja inoculada com Bradyrhizobium. Unifunec Científica Multidiscip. 2021, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. The Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS). Manual de Calagem e Adubação para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina; Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo (CQFS): Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2016; 376p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Picazevicz, A.A.; Kusdra, J.F.; Moreno, A.D.L. Maize growth in response to Azospirillum brasilense, Rhizobium tropici, molybdenum and nitrogen. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 2017, 21, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marcondes, J.A.P.; Caires, E.F. Aplicação de molibdênio e cobalto na semente para cultivo da soja. Bragantia 2005, 64, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Strasser, R.J.; Srivastava, A.; Tsimilli-Michael, M. The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanisms, Regulation and Adaptation; Yunus, M., Pathre, U., Mohanty, P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 445–483. [Google Scholar]
  40. Malavolta, E.; Vitti, G.C.; Oliveira, S.A. Avaliação do Estado Nutricional das Plantas: Princípios e Aplicações; Potafos: Piracicaba, Brazil, 1997; p. 319. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hageman, R.H.; Reed, A.J. Nitrate reductase from higher plants. In Methods in Enzymology; Olshansky, L., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; Volume 69, pp. 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Azevedo, A.M. Package ‘MultivariateAnalysis’. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MultivariateAnalysis/index.html (accessed on 27 July 2025).
  43. Wei, T.; Simko, V. R Package ‘Corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. Available online: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot (accessed on 27 June 2025).
  44. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 27 June 2025).
  45. Torres, D.; Donadio, F.; López, G.; Molina, R.; Obando, M.; Nievas, S.; Rosas, S.; Ćavar Zeljković, S.; Díaz-Zorita, M.; De Diego, N.; et al. Previous incubation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum E109 and Azospirillum argentinense Az39 (formerly A. brasilense Az39) improves the Bradyrhizobium–soybean symbiosis. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 4669–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martin, T.N.; Vey, R.T.; Vieira, F.C.B.; Jacques, R.J.S.; Ferreira, M.M. How did the coinoculation of Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum become indispensable for soybean production in Brazil? Symbiosis 2023, 91, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nicoud, Q.; Lamouche, F.; Chaumeret, A.; Balliau, T.; Le Bars, R.; Bourge, M.; Pierre, F.; Guérard, F.; Sallet, E.; Tuffigo, S.; et al. Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110 nodulation of Aeschynomene afraspera is associated with atypical terminal bacteroid differentiation and suboptimal symbiotic efficiency. mSystems 2021, 6, e01237-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coniglio, A.; Mora, V.; Puente, M.; Cassán, F. Azospirillum as biofertilizer for sustainable agriculture: Azospirillum brasilense AZ39 as a model of PGPR and field traceability. In Microbial Probiotics for Agricultural Systems: Advances in Agronomic Use; Zúñiga-Dávila, D., González-Andrés, F., Ormeño-Orrillo, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fukami, J.; Cerezini, P.; Hungria, M. Azospirillum: Benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation. AMB Expr. 2018, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Santos, M.S.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Outstanding impact of Azospirillum brasilense strains Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 on the Brazilian agriculture: Lessons that farmers are receptive to adopt new microbial inoculants. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2021, 45, e0200128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chibeba, A.M.; Guimarães, M.F.; Brito, O.R.; Nogueira, M.A.; Araújo, R.S.; Hungria, M. Co-inoculação de soja com Bradyrhizobium e Azospirillum promove nodulação precoce. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1641–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bazzo, J.H.B.; Monteiro, J.; de Lucena Marinho, J. Inoculação e coinoculação de Azospirillum e Bradyrhizobium, via sementes e em cobertura, na qualidade fisiológica de sementes de soja. Rev. Cult. Agron. 2020, 29, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yuan, S.; Zhou, S.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Chen, S.; Guo, W.; Yang, H.; Yang, Z.; et al. Identification of the important genes of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens 113-2 involved in soybean nodule development and senescence. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 754837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zaheer, M.S.; Ali, H.H.; Iqbal, M.A.; Erinle, K.O.; Javed, T.; Iqbal, J.; Makhdoom, I.U.H.; Mumtaz, M.Z.; Salama, E.A.A.; Kalaji, H.M.; et al. Cytokinin production by Azospirillum brasilense contributes to increase in growth, yield, antioxidant, and physiological systems of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 886041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ganusova, E.E.; Banerjee, I.; Seats, T.; Alexandre, G. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) protects Azospirillum brasilense from indole-induced stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e02384-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fernandez-Göbel, T.F.; Deanna, R.; Muñoz, N.B.; Robert, G.; Asurmendi, S.; Lascano, R. Redox systemic signaling and induced tolerance responses during soybean–Bradyrhizobium japonicum interaction: Involvement of nod factor receptor and autoregulation of nodulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zeffa, D.M.; Fantin, L.H.; Koltun, A.; de Oliveira, A.L.M.; Nunes, M.P.B.A.; Canteri, M.G.; Gonçalves, L.S.A. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium in soybean crop: A meta-analysis of studies from 1987 to 2018. PeerJ 2020, 8, e7905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chibeba, A.M.; Kyei-Boahen, S.; de Fátima Guimarães, M.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Towards sustainable yield improvement: Field inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium and co-inoculation with Azospirillum in Mozambique. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 2579–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pahari, A.; Nayak, S.K.; Banik, A.; Lakra, P.B.; Mishra, B.B. Biological nitrogen fixation mechanism and applications. In Agriculturally Important Microorganisms; Mishra, B.B., Nayak, S.K., Pahari, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Devi, O.R.; Sarma, A.; Borah, K.; Prathibha, R.S.; Tamuly, G.; Maniratnam, K.; Laishram, B. Importance of zinc and molybdenum for sustainable pulse production in India. Environ. Ecol. 2023, 41, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kotthaus, J.; Kotthaus, J.; Schade, D.; Schwering, U.; Hungeling, H.; Müller-Fielitz, H.; Raasch, W.; Clement, B. New prodrugs of the antiprotozoal drug pentamidine. ChemMedChem 2011, 6, 2233–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Clement, B.; Struwe, M.A. The history of mARC. Molecules 2023, 28, 4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Oliveira, M.S.; Santos, K.F.; de Paula, R.M.; Vitorino, L.C.; Bessa, L.A.; Greer, A.; Di Mascio, P.; De Souza, J.C.P.; Martin-Didonet, C.C. Nitric oxide detection using a chemical trap method for applications in bacterial systems. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Puppo, A.; Pauly, N.; Boscari, A.; Mandon, K.; Brouquisse, R. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide: Key regulators of the Legume-Rhizobium and mycorrhizal symbioses. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2202–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Signorelli, S.; Sainz, M.; Rosa, S.T.; Monza, J. The role of nitric oxide in nitrogen fixation by legumes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Akeel, A.; Jahan, A. Role of cobalt in plants: Its stress and alleviation. In Contaminants in Agriculture: Sources, Impacts and Management; Naeem, M., Ansari, A., Gill, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Marschner, P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hopkins, W. Introduction to Plant Physiology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kolberg, M.; Strand, K.R.; Graff, P.; Andersson, K.K. Structure, function, and mechanism of ribonucleotide reductases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom. 2004, 1699, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gerendás, J.; Polacco, J.C.; Freyermuth, S.K.; Sattelmacher, B. Significance of nickel for plant growth and metabolism. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 1999, 162, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gupta, S.; Yildirim, S.; Andrikopoulos, B.; Wille, U.; Roessner, U. Deciphering the interactions in the root–soil nexus caused by urease and nitrification inhibitors: A review. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salam, A.; Afridi, M.S.; Khan, A.R.; Azhar, W.; Shuaiqi, Y.; Ulhassan, Z.; Qi, J.; Xuo, N.; Chunyan, Y.; Chen, N.; et al. Cobalt induced toxicity and tolerance in plants: Insights from omics approaches. In Heavy Metal Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants: A Biological, Omics, and Genetic Engineering Approach; Hossain, M.A., Hossain, A.K.M.Z., Bourgerie, S., Fujita, M., Dhankher, O.P., Haris, P., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 207–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chrysargyris, A.; Höfte, M.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Di Gioia, F. Micronutrients: The borderline between their beneficial role and toxicity in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 840624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Teixeira, G.C.M.; Prado, R.D.M.; Rocha, A.M.S.; Silva, J.L.F.D.; Lata-Tenesaca, L.F.; Dias, M.A.N. The adequate dose of Mo required for soybean seed treatment is low when associated with Cu, Mn, and Zn compared to its association with Co and Ni, although increasing the risk of toxicity. J. Plant Nutr. 2023, 46, 1545–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, J.; Song, Z.; Ma, J.; Han, H. Toxicity of molybdenum-based nanomaterials on the soybean–rhizobia symbiotic system: Implications for nutrition. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 5773–5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Razzaque, M.S.; Wimalawansa, S.J. Minerals and human health: From deficiency to toxicity. Nutrients 2025, 17, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Aljohani, A.R.; Alharbi, S.; Althobaitri, R.S.; Aljohani, R.S.; Alnemari, R.O.; Atida, H. Micronutrients toxicity from causes to adverse effects: A review. Int. J. Med. Dev. Ctries. 2023, 7, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oliveira, S.L.; Crusciol, C.A.C.; Rodrigues, V.A.; Galeriani, T.M.; Portugal, J.R.; Bossolani, J.W.; Moretti, L.G.; Calonego, J.C.; Cantarella, H. Molybdenum foliar fertilization improves photosynthetic metabolism and grain yields of field-grown soybean and maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 887682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ma, J.; Song, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Han, H. Cobalt ferrite nanozyme for efficient symbiotic nitrogen fixation via regulating reactive oxygen metabolism. Environ. Sci. Nano 2021, 8, 188–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tiwari, S.; Mchanty, P. Cobalt induced changes in photosystem activity in Synechocystis PCC 6803: Alterations in energy distribution and stoichiometry. Photosynth. Res. 1996, 50, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. El-Sheekh, M.M.; El-Naggar, A.H.; Osman, M.E.H.; El-Mazaly, E. Effect of cobalt on growth, pigments and the photosynthetic electron transport in Monoraphidium minutum and Nitzchia perminuta. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 15, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Krieger-Liszkay, A.; Shimakawa, G. Regulation of the generation of reactive oxygen species during photosynthetic electron transport. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2022, 50, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kume, A.; Akitsu, T.; Nasahara, K.N. Why is chlorophyll b only used in light-harvesting systems? J. Plant Res. 2018, 131, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zayed, O.; Hewedy, O.A.; Abdelmoteleb, A.; Ali, M.; Youssef, M.S.; Roumia, A.F.; Seymour, D.; Yuan, Z.C. Nitrogen journey in plants: From uptake to metabolism, stress response, and microbe interaction. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Farhan, M.; Sathish, M.; Kiran, R.; Mushtaq, A.; Baazeem, A.; Hasnain, A.; Hakim, F.F.; Naqvi, S.A.H.; Mubeen, M.; Iftikhar, Y.; et al. Plant nitrogen metabolism: Balancing resilience to nutritional stress and abiotic challenges. Phyton 2024, 93, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Biswal, A.K.; Pattanayak, G.K.; Pandey, S.S.; Leelavathi, S.; Reddy, V.S.; Govindjee; Tripathy, B.C. Light intensity-dependent modulation of chlorophyll b biosynthesis and photosynthesis by overexpression of chlorophyllide a oxygenase in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Miglani, G.S.; Kaur, R.; Sharma, P.; Gupta, N. Leveraging photosynthetic efficiency toward improving crop yields. J. Crop Improv. 2021, 35, 361–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Koch, H.; Sessitsch, A. The microbial-driven nitrogen cycle and its relevance for plant nutrition. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 5547–5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cadoux, C.; Maslać, N.; Di Luzio, L.; Ratcliff, D.; Gu, W.; Wagner, T.; Milton, R.D. The mononuclear metal-binding site of Mo-nitrogenase is not required for activity. JACS Au 2023, 3, 2993–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rodríguez-Jiménez, T.D.J.; Ojeda-Barrios, D.L.; Blanco-Macías, F.; Valdez-Cepeda, R.D.; Parra-Quezada, R. Urease and nickel in plant physiology. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2016, 22, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Abreu, I.; Reguera, M.; Bonilla, A.; Bolaños, L.; Bonilla, I. Mineral nutrition in the legume–rhizobia nitrogen fixing symbiosis. In Beneficial Plant-Microbial Interactions: Ecology and Applications; Rodelas González, M.B., Gonzalez-Lopez, J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barbosa, J.Z.; Hungria, M.; da Silva Sena, J.V.; Poggere, G.; dos Reis, A.R.; Corrêa, R.S. Meta-analysis reveals benefits of co-inoculation of soybean with Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. in Brazil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 163, 103913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Reis, A.F.B.; Rosso, L.H.M.; Adee, E.; Davidson, D.; Kovács, P.; Purcell, L.C.; Below, F.E.; Casteel, S.N.; Knott, C.; Kandel, H.; et al. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in the U.S. soybean systems. Field Crops Res. 2022, 283, 108537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Naorem, A.; Tilgam, J.; Priyadarshini, P.; Tak, Y.; Bharati, A.; Patel, A. Nitrogenase enzyme complex: Functions, regulation, and biotechnological applications. In Advances in Plant Nitrogen Metabolism; Yousuf, P.Y., Shabir, P.A., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nichio, B.T.D.L.; Chaves, R.B.R.; Pedrosa, F.D.O.; Raittz, R.T. Exploring diazotrophic diversity: Unveiling Nif core distribution and evolutionary patterns in nitrogen-fixing organisms. BMC Genom. 2025, 26, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 13 02680 g001
Figure 1. Growth of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Plant height (a), stem diameter (b), dry mass of aerial part (c), and root dry mass (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Growth of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Plant height (a), stem diameter (b), dry mass of aerial part (c), and root dry mass (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 02680 g001
Microorganisms 13 02680 g002
Figure 2. Growth, nodulation, and photosynthetic pigment accumulation in Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Total dry mass (a), number of nodules (b), chlorophyll a index (c), and chlorophyll b index (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Growth, nodulation, and photosynthetic pigment accumulation in Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Total dry mass (a), number of nodules (b), chlorophyll a index (c), and chlorophyll b index (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 02680 g002
Microorganisms 13 02680 g003
Figure 3. Total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in leaves of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Total chlorophyll (a), ABS/RC (b), TR0/RC (c), and ET0/RC (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in leaves of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Total chlorophyll (a), ABS/RC (b), TR0/RC (c), and ET0/RC (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 02680 g003
Microorganisms 13 02680 g004
Figure 4. Chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters and net carbon assimilation rate in leaves of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). DI0/RC (a), Fv/Fm (b), Pi_Abs (c), and A (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters and net carbon assimilation rate in leaves of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). DI0/RC (a), Fv/Fm (b), Pi_Abs (c), and A (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 02680 g004
Microorganisms 13 02680 g005
Figure 5. Gas exchange parameters and nitrogen content in leaves and shoots of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). E (a), Ci (b), Gsw (c), and shoot N content (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Gas exchange parameters and nitrogen content in leaves and shoots of Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). E (a), Ci (b), Gsw (c), and shoot N content (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 02680 g005
Microorganisms 13 02680 g006
Figure 6. Nitrogen content, nitrate reductase activity, and relative expression of the nifH gene in Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Root N content (a), total N content (b), nitrate reductase activity (c), and nifH gene expression in nodules (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Nitrogen content, nitrate reductase activity, and relative expression of the nifH gene in Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Root N content (a), total N content (b), nitrate reductase activity (c), and nifH gene expression in nodules (d). Bars followed by the same letter do not differ statistically according to the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05). The dashed line represents the total control (absence of micronutrient treatment and microbial inoculation). Asterisks (*) indicate statistical differences from the total control based on the Dunnett test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 13 02680 g006
Microorganisms 13 02680 g007
Figure 7. Canonical variable analysis (a) and correlation (b) of growth, physiological parameters (photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and gas exchange), nitrogen content, nitrate reductase activity, and relative expression of the nifH gene in Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Chl a = chlorophyll a, Chl b = chlorophyll b, Total Chl = total chlorophyll. Asterisks indicate level of statistical significance: * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Canonical variable analysis (a) and correlation (b) of growth, physiological parameters (photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and gas exchange), nitrogen content, nitrate reductase activity, and relative expression of the nifH gene in Glycine max L. plants subjected to different combinations of the micronutrients Mo, Co, and Ni and the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY). Chl a = chlorophyll a, Chl b = chlorophyll b, Total Chl = total chlorophyll. Asterisks indicate level of statistical significance: * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01.
Microorganisms 13 02680 g007
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the dystroferric red latosol used for cultivating Glycine max L. under treatments combining cobalt sulfate (Co), ammonium molybdate (Mo), and nickel sulfate (Ni) with the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY).
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the dystroferric red latosol used for cultivating Glycine max L. under treatments combining cobalt sulfate (Co), ammonium molybdate (Mo), and nickel sulfate (Ni) with the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY).
CaMgCa+MgAlH+AlKKSPCaCl2
cmolc dm−3mg dm−3pH
1.570.902.470.062.220.3413311.423.815.0
NaFeMnCuZnBCECSBVm
mg dm−3cmolc dm−3%
0.031.3154.54.001.180.105.032.81552.1
Texture (g kg−1)OMCa/MgCa/KMg/KCa/CECMg/CECK/CEC
ClaySiltSandg dm−3Relationship between bases
4884436.11.74.62.731.2117.896.76
P (phosphorus)—Mehlich 1, K (potassium), Na (sodium), Cu (copper), Fe (iron), Mn (manganese) and Zn (zinc)—Melich 1; Ca (calcium), Mg (magnesium) and Al (aluminum)—KCl 1 mol L−1; S (sulfur)—Ca (H2PO4)2 0.01 mol L−1; OM (organic matter)—colorimetric method; B (boron)—hot water; CEC—cation exchange capacity; SB—sum of bases; V%—base saturation; and m%—aluminum saturation.
Table 2. Formulations combining ammonium molybdate (Mo), cobalt sulfate (Co), and nickel sulfate (Ni) with the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY) for the nutrition and inoculation of Glycine max L. plants.
Table 2. Formulations combining ammonium molybdate (Mo), cobalt sulfate (Co), and nickel sulfate (Ni) with the diazotrophic rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense (AZO) and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (BRADY) for the nutrition and inoculation of Glycine max L. plants.
TreatmentFormulations
Control + AZOA. brasilense
Mo + AZO30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + A. brasilense
Co + AZO3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + A. brasilense
Ni + AZO30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense
Mo + Co + AZO30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + A. brasilense
Mo + Ni + AZO30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense
Co + Ni + AZO3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense
Mo + Co + Ni + AZO30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense
Control + BRADYB. diazoefficiens
Mo + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + B. diazoefficiens
Co + BRADY3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + B. diazoefficiens
Ni + BRADY30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + Co + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + Ni + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + B. diazoefficiens
Co + Ni + BRADY3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + Co + Ni + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + B. diazoefficiens
Control + AZO + BRADYA. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + AZO + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Co + AZO + BRADY3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Ni + AZO + BRADY30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + Co + AZO + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + Ni + AZO + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY30 g ha−1 ammonium molybdate + 3 g ha−1 cobalt sulfate + 30 g ha−1 nickel sulfate + A. brasilense + B. diazoefficiens
Total controlUntreated seeds (lack of micronutrients and rhizobacteria)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reis, M.N.O.; Vitorino, L.C.; Moreira, M.A.; Macedo, A.S.; de Sousa, L.F.; Lourenço, L.L.; Bessa, L.A. Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2680. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122680

AMA Style

Reis MNO, Vitorino LC, Moreira MA, Macedo AS, de Sousa LF, Lourenço LL, Bessa LA. Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(12):2680. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reis, Mateus Neri Oliveira, Luciana Cristina Vitorino, Marialva Alvarenga Moreira, Alex Santos Macedo, Letícia Ferreira de Sousa, Lucas Loram Lourenço, and Layara Alexandre Bessa. 2025. "Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean" Microorganisms 13, no. 12: 2680. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122680

APA Style

Reis, M. N. O., Vitorino, L. C., Moreira, M. A., Macedo, A. S., de Sousa, L. F., Lourenço, L. L., & Bessa, L. A. (2025). Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean. Microorganisms, 13(12), 2680. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop