Next Article in Journal
Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean
Previous Article in Journal
Complete Genome Sequencing of Erwinia phyllosphaerae ZX-13, a Novel Biocontrol Agent to Against the Stem Blight Pathogen Pseudocryphonectria elaeocarpicola in Elaeocarpus spp.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Key Technologies of Synthetic Biology in Industrial Microbiology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multi-Omics Insights into Microbial Interactions and Fermented Food Quality

1
College of Life and Health, Dalian University, Dalian 116622, China
2
Liaoning Provincial Engineering Research Center for Marine Microbiology, Dalian 116622, China
3
Dalian Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Dalian 116622, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2679; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122679
Submission received: 23 October 2025 / Revised: 16 November 2025 / Accepted: 17 November 2025 / Published: 25 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Industrial Microbiology)

Abstract

The quality, flavor, and functional attributes of fermented foods are intrinsically shaped by the composition and metabolic dynamics of their microbial communities. This systematic review explores the structural organization, successional patterns, and mechanistic roles of these communities in influencing food quality, with a specific focus on core functional groups—including lactic acid bacteria (LAB), yeasts, and molds—and their interplay through key metabolic pathways. By integrating multi-omics approaches, such as metagenomics and metabolomics, we elucidate the underlying relationships between microbial activity and the formation of volatile flavor compounds, nutritional metabolites, and bioactive substances. These insights offer a scientific basis for the targeted regulation and functional enhancement of fermented food products.

1. Introduction

Fermentation is a fundamental biological process in which microorganisms enzymatically decompose complex organic macromolecules into simpler metabolites. As an integral component of the global carbon cycle, fermentation also represents one of humanity’s oldest and most vital biotechnologies for producing and preserving foods with improved nutritional and sensory properties [1,2]. Microbial communities involved in fermentation are inherently dynamic; however, they frequently exhibit progressive stabilization over time, a phenomenon largely governed by interspecies interactions [3,4,5]. Key ecological processes—including community succession, structural stability, and functional evolution—are strongly influenced by mechanisms such as competition, predation, physiological adaptation, and gene transfer [5,6]. A representative example comes from low-temperature soy sauce mash fermentation, where sequential inoculation of the halophilic bacterium Tetracoccus and the yeast Variabilis enhanced the production of key flavor compounds through microbial synergy, illustrating how interaction-guided strategies can improve product quality [7]. Similarly, solid-state co-fermentation of moringa seeds using Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus niger significantly increased the concentration of bioactive components. This cooperative process improved the utilization of total phenolics by nearly 50% compared to monoculture fermentation, substantially strengthening the antioxidant activity of the final product [8]. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms underlying microbial interactions has become a central research priority, with important implications for the rational design of microbial consortia and precision control of fermentation systems.
In naturally fermented foods, quality attributes are largely governed by functional interactions within core microbial communities [9,10,11]. However, traditional fermentation processes often rely on spontaneous microbial succession in open environments, where community stability is highly susceptible to variations in raw material composition, environmental conditions, and operational practices. This inherent variability poses significant challenges to achieving consistent product quality and standardization [12,13,14,15]. Moreover, conventional analytical approaches based on single-omics technologies—such as metagenomics—have notable limitations: they often fail to detect rare functional taxa, cannot resolve metabolic activity at the species level, and provide limited insight into the molecular basis of microbial interactions. As a result, correlating community structure with functional outputs remains a major challenge [16,17]. As illustrated in Figure 1, To systematically decipher microbial interaction networks and enable targeted regulation, integrated multi-omics approaches are essential. When combined with emerging tools such as synthetic microbial community engineering, these strategies offer a promising pathway to advance fermentation from an experience-based practice toward a mechanism-driven and predictable process [18,19].
Although microbial interactions are widely recognized as critical determinants of fermented food quality, comprehensive reviews that systematically summarize their underlying mechanisms and corresponding regulation strategies remain scarce. This review begins by synthesizing current knowledge on the composition, dynamics, and interaction patterns of microbial communities in fermented foods. Special emphasis is placed on how microorganisms collectively influence the formation of flavor, texture, and safety attributes through metabolic cooperation and competition. In contrast to earlier reviews, this work highlights the application of emerging methodologies—such as multi-omics integration, synthetic microbiome engineering, and genome-scale metabolic modeling—and assesses their potential in clarifying interaction mechanisms and optimizing product quality. Furthermore, we discuss how interdisciplinary collaboration can facilitate the transition of fermentation processes from empirical tradition to precision biotechnology. Ultimately, this analysis aims to provide a theoretical foundation for driving the fermentation industry toward standardization, functional enhancement, and sustainable development.

2. Microbial Community Structural Characteristics in Fermented Foods

2.1. Major Microbial Groups and Their Functions

The microorganisms involved in food fermentation processes are primarily derived from two sources: firstly, through the intentional addition of fermentation starters (such as koji mold or defined starter cultures); and secondly, from the indigenous microbiota naturally associated with raw materials or present in the production environment [20,21,22]. Although traditional fermentation systems typically harbor complex and diverse microbial communities—including yeasts, filamentous fungi, lactic acid bacteria, and acetic acid bacteria—only a limited number of key taxa tend to dominate at different stages of fermentation [23,24,25]. These core microbial groups drive the fermentation process, regulating the synthesis and accumulation of flavor compounds and functional constituents through their metabolic activities, thereby directly shaping the final quality and distinctive attributes of fermented foods.
The composition of core microorganisms varies considerably across different types of fermented products. In fermented vegetables, dominant taxa include LAB, Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Weizmannia, and Lactobacillus [26]. These microorganisms significantly reduce product pH, inhibit spoilage bacteria growth, and create a distinctive tart flavor by producing organic acids such as lactic acid and acetic acid, alongside bacteriocins. Cereal-based fermentations commonly involve species such as Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus mesenteroides, Penicillium spp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Enterobacter faecalis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Lactococcus lactis, Hansenula moniliformis, and Bacillus salinus [27]. These microorganisms synthesize organic acids, ethanol, esters, and polysaccharides, collectively determining the product’s acidity, alcoholic aroma, flavor complexity, and viscous texture. Beverage fermentations are frequently driven by Aspergillus oryzae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus pasteurii, Acetobacter xylinum, Acetobacter glucosum, and Bacillus subtilis [27]. Their metabolic activities produce alcohol, acetic acid, amino acids, and aromatic esters, directly influencing the beverage’s alcohol content, acidity, umami, and fruity undertones. In fermented meat products, common microorganisms include Lactobacillus sakei, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Carnobacterium carnous, Leuconostoc gelidum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus hirae, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus divergens, Lactobacillus carnis, Enterococcus cecorum, and Bacillus lentus [27,28]. These microorganisms lower pH by producing lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and antimicrobial peptides, while simultaneously forming volatile flavor compounds such as ketones and aldehydes. This endows the meat products with a stable shelf life and distinctive fermentative aromas. Dairy fermentations typically rely on a core microbiota comprising Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus cremoris, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus kefiri, Lactobacillus caucasicus, Penicillium camemberti, Acetobacter loevanii, Penicillium roqueforti, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Saccharomyces boulardii [27]. These collaborate to produce lactic acid, ketones, acetaldehyde, and extracellular polysaccharides, critically influencing curd texture, acid-sweet balance, buttery aroma, and velvety mouthfeel.
Given the critical influence of microbial composition on the quality, safety, and shelf life of fermented foods, in-depth analysis of the physiological, metabolic, and genetic features of these core microorganisms has become essential for achieving standardized and precision-controlled industrial production.

2.2. Community Dynamics

Fermented foods represent an ideal model for investigating the dynamic succession of microbial communities. Facilitated by open production conditions and nutrient-rich matrices, microorganisms undergo continuous growth, competition, and orderly progression throughout the fermentation process [29]. This succession is governed by three primary factors: the initial microbial inoculum, environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, water activity), and specific fermentation parameters. Together, these factors drive a functionally phased succession of microorganisms that ultimately shapes the flavor, texture, and safety of the final product.
Comparative analysis of various fermentation systems reveals that microbial succession follows shared ecological principles while displaying pathway diversity depending on raw materials and process design. In the solid-state, multi-stage fermentation system of baijiu, microbial succession exhibits a clear sequential pattern. The initial phase is driven by a pioneer community including fungi such as Saccharomyces, Aspergillus, and Mucor, along with bacteria like Acetobacter and Lactobacillus, which hydrolyze starch and proteins to generate substrates for subsequent metabolic steps [30]. As fermentation progresses to mid- and late stages, the fungal community shifts with increased abundance of Fusarium species, while the bacterial niche becomes dominated by Lactobacillus. Their metabolic outputs—such as ethanol and higher alcohols from yeasts, and organic acids from lactic acid bacteria—act synergistically to develop flavor complexity [31]. By the final stage, lactic acid bacteria emerge as the dominant group (reaching up to 96.28% relative abundance), with their proliferation strongly correlated with the accumulation of key flavor compounds such as esters and n-propanol.
In contrast, kombucha fermentation demonstrates a linear succession driven by metabolite transfer in a liquid system. During the initial phase, yeasts convert sucrose to ethanol; in the mid-phase, acetic acid bacteria oxidize ethanol to acetic acid and form a symbiotic cellulose biofilm (SCOBY) that modulates the microenvironment; by the late stage, lactic acid bacteria become increasingly active, further accumulating organic acids and flavor metabolites, thereby establishing a sequential “sugar → alcohol → acid” metabolic cascade [32].
The natural fermentation of kefir exhibits clear temporal dynamics in its microbial succession. During the initial stage, the bacterial community is dominated by Lactococcus (approximately 62%) and Bacteroides, while the fungal community is primarily composed of Aspergillus and Cordyceps. As fermentation progresses to 24 h, the dominance of Lactococcus further increases (reaching about 72.6%), accompanied by a notable rise in Pseudomonas. Within the fungal community, the relative abundance of Aspergillus declines, while that of Cordyceps increases to 24%. As the core functional group, Lactococcus drives lactose fermentation and acid production. Its sustained enrichment, along with complementary shifts in the fungal community, collectively shapes the distinctive flavor and functional properties of kefir [33].
Similarly, the maturation of cheese involves distinct phases of microbial succession. The initial stage is dominated by lactic acid bacteria, which acidify the medium and coagulate the milk. In later stages, surface yeasts, molds such as Penicillium, and bacteria such as Bacillus licheniformis contribute to the degradation of proteins and lipids, collectively forming the characteristic flavor profile of the cheese [34]. In contrast, Eastern fermented vegetables such as Korean kimchi undergo rapid acid and gas production during the initial phase, driven mainly by heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria including Leuconostoc species. As fermentation proceeds, homofermentative lactic acid bacteria—primarily Lactobacillus species—become dominant, facilitating acid accumulation and achieving a harmonized flavor balance [35].
Collectively, these examples illustrate that successful fermentation relies fundamentally on the coordinated action of key functional microorganisms within appropriate spatial and temporal contexts. Succession is driven by a combination of interspecies interactions—such as nutrient competition, metabolite-mediated inhibition, and cross-feeding—coupled with gradients in environmental conditions. A deeper understanding of microbial succession patterns not only helps elucidate the quality formation mechanisms in traditional fermented foods, but also provides a theoretical basis for improving product consistency through optimized inoculation strategies and environmental control. Viewing fermented foods as dynamic microbial ecosystems represents a crucial scientific approach for advancing traditional fermentation from empirical practice toward controlled, standardized production.

3. Metabolite Synthesis Mediated by Microbial Interactions

Within the complex ecosystem of fermented foods, diverse microbial populations collectively shape the metabolic profile of the final product through various forms of interactions. As summarized in Figure 1, these interactions include mutualism, competition, amensalism, and commensalism. They influence microbial community structure through direct mechanisms (e.g., physical contact, signal transduction) or indirect means (e.g., modification of the microenvironment), thereby activating diverse biosynthetic pathways related to vitamin synthesis, peptide conversion, and accumulation of bioactive compounds. These processes collectively enhance the nutritional and flavor attributes of fermented foods [36].

3.1. Mutualism

Mutualism represents a synergistic form of interdependence among microorganisms in fermentation systems (Figure 2A). Its core mechanism lies in metabolic cross-feeding, whereby intermediates or signaling molecules produced by one microorganism are utilized by another, activating specific metabolic pathways and improving the synthesis efficiency of target compounds [37]. The exchanged substances range from basic metabolites such as sugars, organic acids, amino acids, and vitamins, to functional molecules like quorum-sensing signals and siderophores.
A notable example comes from grape juice fermentation studies: using synthetic ecology approaches, researchers successfully established an engineered mutualism between Saccharomyces cerevisiae (BY4742Δthi4) and Lactobacillus plantarum (IWBT B038) [38]. In the presence of carbon sources such as glucose and fructose, these two organisms exhibit mutually enhanced growth. Lactic acid metabolized by L. plantarum serves as an auxiliary carbon source for S. cerevisiae, while the yeast may in turn support the growth of lactic acid bacteria by supplying B vitamins. Importantly, even low concentrations of lactic acid produced by L. plantarum enhance the synthesis of ethyl acetate—a contributor to fruity aroma in wine—by S. cerevisiae, while significantly suppressing the formation of undesirable higher alcohols, thereby improving the overall wine quality [39].
This example illustrates that understanding and leveraging natural mutualistic relationships can not only stabilize fermentation processes but also enable targeted modulation of sensory properties, offering both theoretical and practical pathways for the precision design of fermented foods.

3.2. Competition

Competition in fermentation systems mainly involves contestation over nutrients and ecological niches (Figure 2B) [40]. Although some microorganisms can transiently inhibit others by secreting antimicrobials such as organic acids or bacteriocins, this suppression is often temporary. Within inhibited populations, tolerant strains frequently emerge, eventually outcompeting previously dominant groups through more efficient resource utilization.
In yogurt fermentation, for instance, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus exhibit mutualistic symbiosis, yet under certain conditions they also compete for carbon or nitrogen sources. In Cheddar cheese, S. thermophilus mitigates nitrogen limitation in Streptococcus lactis by releasing peptides and amino acids via proteolytic activity, highlighting nitrogen as a key limiting resource [41]. Further studies reveal that during the late maturation phase of cheese, inoculated Lactococcus lactis starter cultures can dominate, accounting for 70–87% of the microbial population, demonstrating their superior competitiveness and adaptability, which inevitably reshapes nitrogen resource distribution across the system [42].
Overall, microbial competition acts as a dynamic ecological driver that not only directs community succession but also critically influences final product quality. However, most current studies remain descriptive; future work should integrate real-time monitoring and multi-omics technologies to dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying competitive interactions, such as signaling and environmental adaptation. Regulating competition intensity to steer community succession may offer novel strategies for flavor customization and process standardization.

3.3. Amensalism

Amensalism occurs when one microorganism adversely affects another by releasing inhibitory metabolites (e.g., bacteriocins, organic acids), without being affected itself (Figure 2C). This interaction helps regulate metabolic networks and reduces the accumulation of harmful metabolites such as biogenic amines and mycotoxins, thereby ensuring product safety and quality.
In traditional solid-state fermentation of baijiu, bacilli isolated from Daqu inhibit Streptomyces sampsonii—the main producer of geosmin—effectively eliminating earthy off-odors through bioantagonism [43]. In meat products, LAB such as Lactobacillus sakei CTC494 rapidly dominate and produce sakacin K, a bacteriocin that significantly suppresses Listeria monocytogenes. Studies show that when LAB reach high cell densities, they also effectively inhibit Listeria, especially under low-temperature conditions [44]. Similarly, during kimchi fermentation, LAB produce lactic acid that acidifies the environment, effectively restraining the growth of contaminating E. coli and ensuring normal fermentation progression [45,46,47].
These cases illustrate that successful microbial inhibition in food systems depends on the interplay of strain fitness, environmental conditions, and metabolic activity.

3.4. Commensalism

Commensalism is a classic microbial interaction in which one organism benefits while the other remains unaffected (Figure 2D). This unidirectional benefit makes it a suitable strategy for precision modulation: the introduction of specific functional microbes can enhance product quality without disrupting the native fermentative community.
In wine production, for example, the interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Staphylococcus vitulinus during malolactic fermentation exemplifies commensalism. S. vitulinus enhances the growth of S. cerevisiae without inhibiting lactic acid bacteria, leading to shorter fermentation cycles and improved process efficiency [48].
Soy sauce fermentation further demonstrates the role of commensalism in microbial succession and flavor development. In the initial phase, halophilic tetracocci rapidly metabolize sugars to produce lactic acid, lowering the system pH and creating a favorable environment for acid-tolerant yeasts such as Saccharomyces rouxii [49]. Simultaneously, the proteolytic activity of halophilic bacteria releases free amino acids, which serve as a nitrogen source for Saccharomyces spp., including S. rouxi, supporting the synthesis of characteristic aroma compounds such as 4-ethylguaiacol [50]. This case confirms that commensalism not only drives microbial succession but also serves as an effective ecological strategy for targeted flavor enhancement.

4. Quality Regulation in Fermented Foods Driven by Microbial Interactions

Based on a comprehensive understanding of the relationships between microbial interactions and fermented food quality, this section examines how such interactions regulate three fundamental quality attributes: flavor, texture, and safety. As depicted in Figure 3, microbial communities collectively drive the synthesis and transformation of key metabolites through interconnected metabolic networks, thereby directly shaping the final quality profile of fermented products. The following discussion systematically addresses the formation of flavor compounds, the modulation of texture and physicochemical properties, and strategies for ensuring microbial safety—highlighting the essential role of microbial interactions in defining the overall quality of fermented foods.

4.1. Formation of Flavor Compounds

4.1.1. Typical Flavor Compounds

Esters represent a pivotal class of flavor compounds in fermented foods, widely distributed across products such as fermented fish, beer, dairy items, and wine [51,52,53,54]. Beyond imparting desirable floral and fruity notes, they effectively mask undesirable odors derived from fatty acids and amines [55]. Ethyl esters containing medium- and short-chain fatty acids are particularly valued for their pleasant aroma profiles. Studies indicate that microbial esterases play a central role in ester biosynthesis [56,57,58]. In recent years, LAB, recognized for their GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status, have attracted significant research attention. Their esterases, when employed in fermentation, can accelerate process kinetics, enhance ester yields, and refine product flavor. Paiva et al. reported that ethyl esters can be synthesized via pathways such as acidolysis and transesterification, mediated by lactic acid bacteria, yeasts, or molds [59]. For instance, during alcoholic fermentation, the esterase activity of Lactobacillus helveticus Lac34 reduces the formation of short-chain ethyl esters like ethyl acetate [60], whereas supplementation with Lactobacillus plantarum promotes the accumulation of esters such as ethyl lactate, ethyl acetate, and amyl acetate [61].
Ethanol, another key flavor compound, is mainly generated through heterofermentative pathways in lactic acid bacteria, where glucose is metabolized into lactic acid, ethanol, and carbon dioxide. With its distinct olfactory and trigeminal effects, ethanol enhances flavor perception at appropriate concentrations. In fermented dairy products such as yogurt, ethanol levels typically range between 0.2 and 9.9 mg/kg [62]. Research has shown that fermentation by Streptococcus thermophilus IMAU80842 or Lactobacillus bulgaricus IMAU20401 individually, or in co-culture, yields not only ethanol but also other detectable alcohols including 1-hexanol and 1-heptanol. Notably, ethanol concentration continues to increase during storage, peaking at 8.13–10.99%, while acetaldehyde levels concurrently decline [63,64].
The sour taste in fermented foods is largely shaped by acetic acid, glucuronic acid, and related derivatives. Acetic acid contributes a sharp and pungent acidity, whereas glucuronic acid imparts a milder, more refreshing sourness [65]. In kombucha, for example, yeasts preferentially metabolize fructose to produce ethanol via glycolysis, while acetic acid bacteria oxidize glucose at the C-6 position to yield glucuronic acid and further transform ethanol into acetic acid [66]. These organic acids not only define the product’s sour character but also underpin its preservative properties [67].
Kefir illustrates how multiple flavor compounds arise from microbial synergy. This fermented milk beverage, produced through symbiotic culture of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts, develops its distinctive flavor from a complex metabolic network: lactic and acetic acids provide refreshing sourness, while ethanol (typically 0.08–2.0% v/v) and carbon dioxide contribute subtle wine-like notes and effervescence. Volatile compounds such as acetaldehyde collectively shape a flavor profile characterized by a recognizable “yeasty” aroma [68,69,70,71]. Microbial interactions not only directly synthesize flavor compounds but also modulate precursor turnover, thereby shaping the overall sensory outcome.
In summary, volatile compounds—including esters, alcohols, and organic acids—play a decisive role in defining the flavor of fermented foods. Esters enhance sensory appeal through fruity and floral notes while mitigating off-flavors; ethanol and acetaldehyde, among others, determine flavor intensity and consumer acceptance when present in balanced concentrations. Current evidence confirms that modulating microbial community structure and enzymatic activities can redirect metabolic flux and influence the accumulation of these flavor compounds. This understanding offers a solid foundation for optimizing traditional fermentation processes and developing novel fermented products with tailored flavor profiles.

4.1.2. Multi-Pathway Collaborative Flavor Orientation Regulation Strategy

During fermentation, bacteria and fungi metabolize carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. This process not only supplies energy for microbial growth but also yields a wide array of volatile compounds that confer distinctive aromas and flavors to fermented foods. These volatiles play a fundamental role in defining the sensory properties and overall acceptability of the final product.
The flavor-forming potential of a fermentation system is governed by the interplay between microbial composition, process parameters—such as temperature, pH, and duration—and substrate characteristics. In the initial phase, microorganisms rapidly colonize the substrate surface, producing primary metabolites including amino acids and vitamins while obtaining energy for proliferation [72]. As fermentation progresses into the mid-to-late stages, microorganisms enter exponential and stationary growth phases, during which they synthesize substantial quantities of secondary metabolites. These compounds are closely associated with the functional and sensory attributes of the food. Among them, volatile metabolites—organic compounds with molecular weights typically between 50 and 200 Da—constitute only a minor proportion of total microbial metabolites, yet they exert a decisive influence on the final quality of fermented products [73]. As summarized in Table 1, the principal metabolic pathways contributing to volatile formation include carbohydrate metabolism, polysaccharide degradation, proteolysis, lipid metabolism, and fatty acid breakdown. It is noteworthy that while multiple microorganisms may contribute to the synthesis of the same metabolite, certain key flavor compounds are exclusively generated via specialized metabolic routes.
In the context of targeted flavor modulation, Lu et al. demonstrated that exogenous addition of L-leucine during Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation of fruit juice enhanced the activity and metabolic flux of key enzymes in the leucine-derived metabolic pathway. This intervention broadly influenced central carbon metabolism, leading to a marked increase in the production of higher alcohols and esters such as isoamyl alcohol and isoamyl acetate [74]. This strategy illustrates a practical means of steering microbial metabolism through targeted nutrient supplementation to intensify desirable flavor traits, offering valuable insights for flavor management in fermented beverages including wine, huangjiu, and soy sauce.
In a study on high-salt fermentation of mandarin fish, halotolerant lactic acid bacteria—including Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Lactobacillus sakai—were shown to promote the oxidative degradation of phospholipids, particularly phosphatidylcholine, releasing free fatty acids. These polyunsaturated fatty acids subsequently undergo auto-oxidation and enzyme-catalyzed oxidation, yielding a range of volatile aldehydes and alcohols that collectively shape the characteristic fatty aroma and overall flavor profile of the product [75]. These findings offer a systematic strategy for modulating lipid oxidation and optimizing flavor and safety through controlled salinity and microbial community design.
In a novel approach to flavor research in baijiu, Xu et al. first screened Bacillus strains expressing high levels of AlsS/AlsD enzymes, then adjusted fermentation conditions and community structure to suppress the activity of functional bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas) carrying TpdAB degradation enzymes. This dual strategy effectively reduced the loss of tetramethylpyrazine (TTMP), a key flavor component [76]. By moving beyond a singular focus on biosynthetic pathways, this study established a complete “synthesis–degradation” metabolic network for TTMP within the baijiu system, providing a new theoretical basis for understanding the dynamic changes of flavor compounds during fermentation.

4.2. Extracellular Polysaccharides Precisely Modulate

Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) synthesized by LAB are natural macromolecules with significant applications in a wide range of fermented and formulated foods. These biopolymers effectively improve food texture, enhance palatability, and increase water-holding capacity and stability, making them key functional ingredients in the modern food industry. The functional versatility of EPS stems from their diversity in molecular weight, branching degree, and monomer composition, which enables specific interactions with food components such as proteins and starches, thereby modulating the rheological and stability properties of the food matrix [77,78,79,80]. In practical applications, EPS incorporation generally leads to increased viscosity, improved texture, enhanced emulsion stability, and overall optimization of mouthfeel.
The functional role of EPS is particularly evident in fermented dairy products. Neutral EPS produced through microbial metabolism can modulate intermolecular protein interactions, thereby reducing gel hardness. In contrast, negatively charged EPS binds to acidic groups on casein, reinforcing the casein network and significantly increasing the apparent viscosity of the product. Furthermore, high-molecular-weight EPS with rigid backbones and low branching degrees can form entangled polymer networks that enhance product firmness and whey retention capacity. This structure imparts characteristic shear-thinning rheological behavior, thereby comprehensively improving the sensory quality of fermented milk [81].
EPS also show considerable potential for texture modification in non-dairy systems, such as plant-based products including oat milk and soy milk. They enhance system viscosity by increasing steric hindrance and promoting molecular entanglement between proteins. In aqueous environments, the thickening effect of EPS is closely associated with their molecular morphology—such as branching pattern and backbone flexibility—as well as molecular weight and charge distribution. For example, EPS produced by Lactobacillus plantarum CSK reduces the shear strain rate in soymilk, improves gel elasticity and recovery, and ultimately contributes to the formation of a more robust gel network [81,82].
Therefore, the functional efficacy of EPS in food texture regulation depends largely on the precise interplay between their molecular properties and specific food matrices. This attribute positions EPS as a valuable tool for targeted texture design, offering broad prospects for future food applications.

4.3. Safety Control

The amensalism between different species can effectively inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms, including pathogenic bacteria and pathogenic fungi, thereby enhancing the safety of fermented foods. Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides secreted by certain microorganisms to gain ecological competitive advantage. These compounds are harmless to the producer strains but effectively inhibit the growth of competing microorganisms [83]. In an era of increasing concern over the health risks posed by chemical preservatives, bacteriocins have attracted attention as promising natural antimicrobial alternatives. They not only exhibit intrinsic antibacterial activity but can also act synergistically with certain antibiotics [84]. With the escalating challenge of bacterial resistance and growing consumer demand for clean-label foods, the development of novel and safe bio-preservatives has become increasingly urgent.
Studies have shown that LAB isolated from traditional fermented vegetables can produce antimicrobial substances active against a range of common foodborne pathogens, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. This broad-spectrum inhibitory activity highlights the potential of LAB as natural bio-preservatives for controlling pathogens in diverse food matrices. However, the practical application of bacteriocins faces several challenges, such as difficulties in large-scale production and purification, relatively high cost, incomplete cytotoxicity profiles, and a limited antimicrobial spectrum. Moreover, bacteriocins are susceptible to degradation by human proteases, rendering them inactive and thus unsuitable for direct oral administration. Beyond directly inhibiting pathogens, microbial interactions can also enhance the overall safety of fermented foods by degrading or reducing hazardous compounds such as carcinogenic precursors and allergens.
Organic acids represent another crucial class of safety-related metabolites in fermentation systems. They contribute to the characteristic acidity of fermented foods while fulfilling essential preservative functions. The dynamic accumulation of multiple organic acids often results from synergistic metabolism within microbial communities. For example, during kombucha fermentation, yeasts preferentially utilize fructose via glycolysis to produce ethanol, while acetic acid bacteria oxidize glucose at the C-6 position to generate mildly acidic glucuronic acid, simultaneously converting ethanol into acetic acid [85]. In addition to acetic and glucuronic acids, kombucha contains various other organic acids, including citric, malic, tartaric, and succinic acids [67]. The combined presence of these acidic compounds significantly lowers the system pH, effectively suppressing the growth of undesirable microorganisms.
In summary, the current safety assurance framework for fermented foods has begun to incorporate a technical system centered on bacteriocins and organic acids. To further realize their application potential and improve risk management, future research should focus on three key directions: overcoming technical bottlenecks in bacteriocin production and stabilization, elucidating multi-factor regulatory networks in fermentation processes, and enhancing public understanding of fermented food safety. Such efforts will help shift the field from a reactive “post-production preservation” approach toward proactive “end-to-end control,” better aligning with consumers’ enduring demand for safe, natural, and health-promoting foods.

5. Utilizing Multi-Omics Research to Explore the Relationship Between Fermented Foods Composed of Complex Microorganisms and Their Functionality, Flavor, and Quality

In recent years, the application of multi-omics technologies to study microbial interactions in fermented foods has advanced considerably. These approaches deliver comprehensive insights into changes in differentially expressed genes (DEGs), shifts in microbial community structure, protein expression dynamics, and active metabolic pathways throughout fermentation (Table 2), offering valuable perspectives for both scientific and industrial applications. As outlined in Figure 4, integrated multi-omics—a core methodology in systems biology—focuses on consolidating multidimensional data from genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. By employing computational tools such as machine learning, this strategy enables deep exploration of the complex linkages between microbial metabolic networks and phenotypic outcomes. It effectively overcomes the constraints inherent in single-omics studies, allowing for a holistic analysis of dynamic fermentation processes. As a result, this approach supports a more systematic understanding of microbial community structure, functional capacity, and the mechanistic basis of product quality, thereby establishing a solid theoretical foundation for optimizing fermentation processes.

5.1. Flavor

Fermentation is a biochemical process in which microorganisms—including bacteria, yeasts, and fungi—metabolize carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids to produce a diverse array of metabolites. Among these, flavor compounds play a decisive role in shaping the aroma, taste, and overall sensory characteristics of fermented foods. With the development of systems biology, integrated multi-omics strategies have become powerful tools for deciphering the complexity of this process.
In the fermented black bean (douchi) system, Wu et al. applied a combined transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approach to systematically reveal the regulatory relationships between differentially expressed genes and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Their study identified 130 upregulated metabolites and 160 downregulated proteins that collectively contribute to the development of the characteristic flavor profile of douchi [89]. Similarly, in baijiu fermentation research, the integration of metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics has not only identified core microbial functional units responsible for flavor formation but also delineated the dynamic cooperative networks among diverse microbial communities during fermentation. This provides a systematic framework for achieving precision quality control at the microbial level [86]. In a study on the solid-state batch fermentation of green tea, integrated genomics and metabolomics revealed intrinsic links between dominant fungal communities (primarily Aspergillus spp.) and non-volatile flavor compounds. The research confirmed that Aspergillus species secrete a wide range of hydrolytic enzymes—such as cellulase, pectinase, and protease—that effectively break down substrates and facilitate the formation of flavor precursors [90]. As illustrated in Figure 5, within dairy fermentation systems, research typically commences with raw materials, systematically tracing the entire process by which lactic acid bacteria drive the synthesis of flavor compounds through metabolic pathways including proteolysis, glycolysis, and lipolysis. This multidimensional research framework encompasses flavor compound analysis, functional strain selection, and the elucidation of microbial regulatory mechanisms. It aligns closely with the intrinsic logic of multi-omics integration, vividly demonstrating the synergistic advantages of this strategy in deciphering flavor formation within fermented foods.
The core value of multi-omics integration lies in its ability to transcend the limitations of single-omics analyses at a systems level. By correlating gene expression, protein function, and metabolite dynamics, it provides a holistic view of the molecular mechanisms underpinning flavor formation [91]. When combined with computational methods such as machine learning and deep learning, researchers can even predict the formation and transformation pathways of key flavor compounds such as esters and aldehydes [92]. Furthermore, cross-validation and complementary data exchange among multiple omics datasets help correct information gaps or biases introduced by individual technologies, thereby enabling more accurate identification of dominant microbial strains, key genes, functional enzyme systems, and their associated characteristic flavor compounds [93].
Predictive models built using these approaches—linking microbial community structure to flavor quality—provide a theoretical basis for the targeted screening of key functional microorganisms and the design of flavor modulation strategies. Further integration of flavoromics with artificial sensory evaluation offers the potential to achieve precise quantification of aroma-active components and scientifically predict flavor profiles [94]. In summary, multi-omics technologies provide a new perspective for systematically understanding the molecular mechanisms of flavor formation in fermented foods. This approach not only holds significant theoretical value but also demonstrates broad application potential in advancing the precision and standardization of the fermentation industry.

5.2. Quality

The stability and safety of fermented food quality are often challenged by metabolic variability and complex interactions within microbial communities, making consistent quality assurance difficult to achieve [42]. Multi-omics technologies offer powerful means to systematically analyze the roles of beneficial, pathogenic, and spoilage microorganisms throughout fermentation. The relative stability of fermented products generally depends on effective suppression of pathogens through factors such as raw material selection, fermentation duration, and pH control.
The use of starter cultures from different sources—such as the successful fermentation observed with kimchi or garlic, compared to unsuccessful outcomes with ginger or red chili—leads to significant differences in dominant microorganisms and their metabolite profiles. This underscores the critical influence of microbial community composition on final product quality [95]. Similarly, Medina et al. reported that although green olives maintained good quality in early to mid-fermentation stages, the later emergence of multiple spoilage microorganisms negatively affected product integrity [96].
Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic analyses further revealed that when the pH of fermented milk dropped to 5.5, expression of glutamate-related proteins was suppressed, whereas key enzymes involved in cystine catabolism were significantly upregulated, directly influencing dairy quality attributes [97]. These cases collectively demonstrate that the dynamic succession of microbial communities is a decisive factor in determining the quality of fermented products.
Thus, multi-omics technologies have become essential tools in modern food biotechnology, providing a robust scientific basis for improving fermentation quality, enhancing safety, and optimizing microbial interactions.

5.3. Functionality

Multi-omics integration strategies are increasingly recognized as powerful methodologies for systematically deciphering the functional components of fermented foods. By synthesizing biological information across multiple dimensions, these approaches significantly improve the accuracy of bioactive compound identification while providing systematic insights into their formation mechanisms and safety attributes.
In the field of bioactive peptide research, scientists have integrated peptidomics with metagenomics to conduct in-depth analysis of fermented soybean systems. These investigations led to the identification of 714 natural peptides—561 of which were novel—and specifically revealed that certain peptide fragments derived from the degradation of soybean allergenic proteins (e.g., IPPGVPY and PLDLTSFVLHEAI) exhibit significant monoamine oxidase inhibitory activity. This finding provides molecular-level evidence of how microbial fermentation converts allergenic proteins into neuroprotective bioactive peptides [98].
Regarding antioxidant metabolites, the combined application of transcriptomics and metabolomics has clarified the antioxidant mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria. Studies show that under aerobic conditions, lactic acid bacteria upregulate the expression of genes such as superoxide dismutase while simultaneously synthesizing metabolites including extracellular polysaccharides and short-chain fatty acids. These components act synergistically to enhance the system’s free radical scavenging capacity, an antioxidant pathway validated in both fermented dairy products and traditional foods such as fermented eggs [99].
Compared to the systems-level perspective provided by multi-omics, traditional single-omics analyses (e.g., genomics alone) exhibit notable limitations. Although genomics can reveal changes in gene abundance and suggest potential microbial interactions, it struggles to establish direct links between genetic potential and functional phenotypes [100]. The strength of multi-omics integration lies in its ability to trace the genetic origins of specific bioactive compounds [101] and dynamically map phenotypic outcomes through integrated transcriptomic and proteomic data, thereby advancing our holistic understanding of complex fermented food systems.
By systematically integrating metagenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data, researchers can reconstruct comprehensive microbial metabolic networks. This enables precise identification of key functional genes and their regulatory patterns, ultimately supporting targeted control of fermentation processes. This strategy not only deepens scientific understanding of fermented food functionality but also establishes a robust foundation for the industrial production of high-quality functional fermented foods.
In summary, multi-omics technologies have become indispensable for deciphering bioactive components in fermented foods. Through integration of biological information across multiple levels, they comprehensively reveal the formation mechanisms of functional components during microbial fermentation, providing a solid theoretical and technical basis for the targeted design and quality improvement of functional fermented products.

5.4. Industrial Applications

In recent years, the understanding of microbial succession mechanisms in food fermentation has significantly advanced, with related research outcomes increasingly being implemented in industrial settings. This progress is reflected in several key areas, including the establishment of dedicated microbial resource banks for fermented foods, the development of functional prediction models, and improved optimization and control of fermentation processes. Together, these developments provide strong support for the standardization and quality enhancement of traditional fermented products. In particular, omics technologies are demonstrating unique value in industrial applications for process prediction and optimization.
In Korean kimchi production, for instance, the Fermentation Microbiome Database (ODFM) integrates multi-omics data from the World Kimchi Institute, establishing a foundational resource for screening starter cultures with superior fermentation performance and safety attributes. This database is expected to enable predictive modeling and precise regulation of fermentation processes in the future, thereby advancing the standardization of kimchi production [102]. In the context of baijiu manufacturing, multi-omics approaches have systematically clarified the role of microbial communities in cellar mud in shaping key flavor compounds. Researchers successfully established a correlation model between microbial succession in artificial cellar mud and flavor metabolism. Functional predictions indicated that prokaryotic microorganisms in specific batches of cellar mud were significantly involved in organic acid metabolic pathways—a finding later corroborated by proteomic and metabolomic data. These key microbes, proteins, and metabolites now serve as effective biomarkers for evaluating cellar mud quality and monitoring fermentation status, offering clear targets for optimizing mud cultivation and improving baijiu quality [103].
Notably, emerging gene editing technologies are creating new opportunities in fermented food science. As highlighted by Pan and Barrangou, CRISPR-based genome editing enables precise genetic modification of food-associated microorganisms. This technology not only facilitates the development of enhanced probiotics and novel biotherapeutics but also allows targeted modulation of microbial community structures within food matrices, demonstrating considerable application potential [104,105].
With the deepening integration of multi-omics technologies and gene-editing tools, research in food fermentation is shifting from descriptive analysis toward mechanistic insight and precision control. These advances not only enhance the understanding of microbial functions in traditional fermentation but also establish a solid foundation for standardized production, quality improvement, and innovative development of fermented foods.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

This review systematically examines the composition, dynamic succession patterns, and regulatory mechanisms of microbial communities in fermented foods, with a focus on how microbial interactions govern flavor, texture, and safety. Studies indicate that core functional microorganisms—primarily lactic acid bacteria, yeasts, and molds—collectively shape the distinctive qualities of fermented foods through synergistic metabolic activities, including carbohydrate metabolism, proteolysis, and lipid degradation. Within these processes, mutualistic and competitive relationships critically influence the direction and intensity of key metabolic pathways.
In recent years, the widespread adoption of integrated multi-omics approaches—such as metagenomics and metabolomics—has significantly advanced our understanding of the relationships between microbial communities and volatile flavor compounds, nutritional constituents, and bioactive metabolites. These techniques provide novel perspectives and methodological support for the targeted regulation of fermented food quality. Nevertheless, several critical challenges remain. First, functional annotation systems for microbial genes are still incomplete, with considerable gaps in knowledge regarding non-model species and complex secondary metabolites. Second, the high cost of multi-omics technologies and the complexity of data analysis limit their large-scale industrial application. More importantly, the lack of unified data standards across research platforms impedes cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses, hindering the broader adoption and development of these methodologies in the fermented food sector.
Future efforts should prioritize the following directions: developing specialized databases for fermentative microorganisms to improve gene functional annotation, with an emphasis on characterizing genes of unknown function; establishing cost-effective, small-sample multi-omics workflows to facilitate routine quality monitoring; implementing cross-platform data standardization protocols to enhance reusability and integration; and strengthening causal validation between microbial interactions and metabolic outcomes to advance from correlation to mechanism.
By systematically addressing these challenges, multi-omics technologies can help transition fermented food production from an experience-based practice to a mechanism-driven industry, supporting standardization, functionalization, and sustainable development. The theoretical framework and technical pathways outlined in this review are intended to provide systematic guidance for understanding quality formation mechanisms and developing enhancement strategies, offering both scientific value and practical relevance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding Acquisition, S.D.; Writing—Review and Editing, L.D.; Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.J.; Methodology, Formal Analysis, X.J.; Data Curation, Q.Y.; Validation, P.S.; Visualization, M.S.; Validation, Y.L.; Software, Z.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Plan Joint Plan (Natural Science Foundation-General Program) (No.2025-MSLH-016); Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2014020134); Liaoning Provincial Department of Education University Basic Scientific Research Surface Project (JYTMS20230376).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chuah, W.W.; Tan, J.S.; Hazwani Oslan, S.N.; Bothi Raja, P. Enhancing Food Preservation with Postbiotic Metabolites γ-Aninobutyric Acid (GABA) and Bacteriocin-Like Inhibitory Substances (BLIS) Produced by Lactobacillus brevis C23 Co-Cultures in Plant-Based Medium. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2024, 54, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Koistinen, V.M.; Hedberg, M.; Shi, L.; Johansson, A.; Savolainen, O.; Lehtonen, M.; Aura, A.M.; Hanhineva, K.; Landberg, R. Metabolite Pattern Derived from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum-Fermented Rye Foods and In Vitro Gut Fermentation Synergistically Inhibits Bacterial Growth. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2022, 66, e2101096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, J.; Liu, H.-P.; Yin, X.-J.; Dong, Z.-H.; Wang, S.-R.; Li, J.-F.; Shao, T. Dynamics of Phyllosphere Microbiota and Chemical Parameters at Various Growth Stages and Their Contribution to Anaerobic Fermentation of Pennisetum giganteum. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0228822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barber, J.N.; McDonald, M.J. Microbial interspecies interactions constrain community adaptation but maintain ecological stability. ISME J. 2022, 16, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gapp, C.; Dijamentiuk, A.; Mangavel, C.; Callon, C.; Theil, S.; Revol-Junelles, A.-M.; Chassard, C.; Borges, F. Serial fermentation in milk generates functionally diverse community lineages with different degrees of structure stabilization. mSystems 2024, 9, e0044524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, C.; Courty, P.E.; Varoquaux, N.; Cole, B.; Montoya, L.; Xu, L.; Purdom, E.; Vogel, J.; Hutmacher, R.B.; Dahlberg, J.A.; et al. Successional Adaptive Strategies Revealed by Correlating Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Abundance with Host Plant Gene Expression. Mol. Ecol. 2023, 32, 2674–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, X.; Xu, X.; Wu, C.; Tong, X.; Ou, S. Effect of Sequential Inoculation of Tetragenococcus halophilus and Wickerhamomyces anomalus on the Flavour Formation of Early-Stage Moromi Fermented at a Lower Temperature. Foods 2023, 12, 3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Puspitasari, C.; Pinsirodom, P.; Wattanachaisaereekul, S. Effect of solid-state fermentation using Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus niger on bitter and bioactive compounds of Moringa oleifera seed flour. LWT 2024, 207, 116616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.-F.; Li, X.; Datta, R.; Chen, J.; Du, Y.; Du, D.-L.J.A.S.E. Key factors shaping prokaryotic communities in subtropical forest soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 169, 104162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Q.; Shi, Y.; Ngea, G.L.N.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, X.; Zhang, H. Changes of the microbial community in kiwifruit during storage after postharvest application of Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Walsh, A.M.; Crispie, F.; Kilcawley, K.; O’Sullivan, O.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Claesson, M.J.; Cotter, P.D. Microbial Succession and Flavor Production in the Fermented Dairy Beverage Kefir. mSystems 2016, 1, e0005216, Erratum in mSystems 2017, 2, e00003-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, S.; Lou, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Laaksonen, O.; Li, P.; Zhang, J.; Battino, M.; Yang, B.; Gu, Q.J. Aroma characteristics of volatile compounds brought by variations in microbes in winemaking. Food Chem. 2023, 420, 136075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, F.; Alenyorege, E.A.; Ouyang, N.; Zhou, A.; Ma, H. Simulated natural and high temperature solid-state fermentation of soybean meal: A comparative study regarding microorganisms, functional properties and structural characteristics. LWT 2022, 159, 113125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stefanou, C.-R.; Bartodziejska, B.; Gajewska, M.; Szosland-Fałtyn, A. Microbiological Quality and Safety of Traditional Raw Milk Cheeses Manufactured on a Small Scale by Polish Dairy Farms. Foods 2022, 11, 3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, L.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Bianba, C.; Guo, H.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, H. Exploring microbial dynamics associated with flavours production during highland barley wine fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, D. Microbiome Multi-Omics Network Analysis: Statistical Considerations, Limitations, and Opportunities. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, e00995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Z.; Baltar, F.; Herndl, G.J. Decoupling between the Genetic Potential and the Metabolic Regulation and Expression in Microbial Organic Matter Cleavage across Microbiomes. mBio 2024, 15, e0303623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruan, Z.; Chen, K.; Cao, W.; Meng, L.; Yang, B.; Xu, M.; Xing, Y.; Li, P.; Freilich, S.; Chen, C.; et al. Engineering natural microbiomes toward enhanced bioremediation by microbiome modeling. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guan, T.; Wu, X.; Hou, R.; Tian, L.; Huang, Q.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, S.; Xiang, S.; Zhang, J. Application of Clostridium butyricum, rummeliibacillus suwonensis, and Issatchenkia orientalis for Nongxiangxing baijiu fermentation: Improves the microbial communities and flavor of upper fermented grain. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nguyen, N.T.H.; Huang, M.B.; Liu, F.Y.; Huang, W.L.; Tran, H.T.; Hsu, T.W.; Huang, C.L.; Chiang, T.Y. Deciphering Microbial Community Dynamics along the Fermentation Course of Soy Sauce under Different Temperatures Using Metagenomic Analysis. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2023, 42, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Long, J.; Yu, L.; Huang, L.; Xia, N.; Teng, J.; Wei, B. Isolation, Identification, and Community Diversity of Microorganisms during Tank Fermentation of Liupao Tea. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 4230–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, G.; Hu, M.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Pan, Z.; Li, M.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Z. Microbial community and metabolite dynamics during soy sauce koji making. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 841529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tu, W.; Cao, X.; Cheng, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, T.; Wu, Q.; Xiang, P.; Shen, C.; Li, Q. Chinese Baijiu: The perfect works of microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 919044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, G.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Yao, Y. Exploring the flavor formation mechanism under osmotic conditions during soy sauce fermentation in Aspergillus oryzae by proteomic analysis. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Y.; Niu, C.; Shan, W.; Zheng, F.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Li, Q. Physicochemical, flavor and microbial dynamic changes during low-salt doubanjiang (broad bean paste) fermentation. Food Chem. 2021, 351, 128454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Watanabe, K.; Fujimoto, J.; Tomii, Y.; Sasamoto, M.; Makino, H.; Kudo, Y.; Okada, S. Lactobacillus kisonensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus otakiensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus rapi sp. nov. and Lactobacillus sunkii sp. nov., heterofermentative species isolated from sunki, a traditional Japanese pickle. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sharma, R.; Carg, P.; Kumar, P.; Bhatia, S.K.; Kulshrestha, S. Microbial fermentation and its role in quality improvement of fermented foods. Fermentation 2020, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, C.; Huang, J. Contribution of Latilactobacillus sakei to Metabolite Changes and Microbiome Composition during Fermented Sausage Processing. Food Chem. Mol. Sci. 2022, 4, 100089. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kang, J.; Li, R.; Hu, Y.; Huang, X.; Chen, X.-X.; Han, B.-Z. Microbial Interactions in Mixed-Species Biofilms on the Surfaces of Baijiu Brewing Environments. Food Res. Int. 2024, 191, 114698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, J.; Liu, Y.; Lin, B.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, W.; Yang, Q.; Chen, S. Effects of ultra-long fermentation time on the microbial community and flavor components of light-flavor Xiaoqu Baijiu based on fermentation tanks. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pang, X.N.; Chen, C.; Huang, X.N.; Yan, Y.Z.; Chen, J.Y.; Han, B.Z. Influence of indigenous lactic acid bacteria on the volatile flavor profile of light-flavor Baijiu. LWT 2021, 147, 111540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Tso, N.; Huang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, R. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Microbial Synergistic Metabolic Mechanisms and Health Benefits in Kombucha Fermentation: A Review. Biology 2025, 14, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. de Almeida Brasiel, P.G.; Dutra Medeiros, J.; Barbosa Ferreira Machado, A.; Ferreira, M.S.; Peluzio, M.D.C.G.; Luquetti, S.C.P.D. Microbial community dynamics of fermented kefir beverages changes over time. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2021, 74, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Korena, K.; Krzyzankova, M.; Florianova, M.; Karasova, D.; Babak, V.; Strakova, N.; Juricova, H. Microbial succession in the cheese ripening process—Competition of the starter cultures and the microbiota of the cheese plant environment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jeong, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, J.Y.; Choi, E.J.; Jeon, C.O. Microbial succession and metabolite changes during long-term storage of Kimchi. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, M763–M769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. May, A.; Narayanan, S.; Alcock, J.; Varsani, A.; Maley, C.; Aktipis, A. Kombucha: A Novel Model System for Cooperation and Conflict in a Complex Multi-Species Microbial Ecosystem. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, J.; Xiao, X.; Dong, Y.; Shi, L.; Xu, T.; Wu, F. The anti-obesity effect of fermented barley extracts with Lactobacillus plantarum dy-1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in diet-induced obese rats. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. du Toit, S.C.; Rossouw, D.; du Toit, M.; Bauer, F.F. Enforced Mutualism Leads to Improved Cooperative Behavior between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, Z.; Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Wang, B.; Bai, Y.; Miao, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Sun, B. Interactive mechanism-guided microbial interaction dynamics in food fermentations: Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts as a case example. Food Biosci. 2025, 68, 106453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Machado, D.; Maistrenko, O.M.; Andrejev, S.; Kim, Y.; Bork, P.; Patil, K.R.; Patil, K.R. Polarization of microbial communities between competitive and cooperative metabolism. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 5, 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  41. Melkonian, C.; Zorrilla, F.; Kjærbølling, I.; Blasche, S.; Machado, D.; Junge, M.; Sørensen, K.I.; Andersen, L.T.; Patil, K.R.; Zeidan, A.A. Microbial interactions shape cheese flavour formation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Montel, M.-C.; Buchin, S.; Mallet, A.; Delbes-Paus, C.; Vuitton, D.A.; Desmasures, N.; Berthier, F. Traditional cheeses: Rich and diverse microbiota with associated benefits. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 177, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhi, Y.; Wu, Q.; Du, H.; Xu, Y. Biocontrol of geosmin-producing Streptomyces spp. by two Bacillus strains from Chinese liquor. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 231, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Costa, J.C.C.P.; Bover-Cid, S.; Bolívar, A.; Zurera, G.; Pérez-Rodríguez, F. Modelling the Interaction of the Sakacin-Producing Lactobacillus sakei CTC494 and Listeria monocytogenes in Filleted Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) under Modified Atmosphere Packaging at Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 297, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shim, Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Jung, J. Effects of Kimchi-Derived Lactic Acid Bacteria on Reducing Biological Hazards in Kimchi. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 34, 2586–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yaqoob, S.; Imtiaz, A.; Awan, K.A.; Murtaza, M.S.; Mubeen, B.; Yinka, A.A.; Boasiako, T.A.; Alsulami, T.; Rehman, A.; Khalifa, I.; et al. Impact of fermentation through synergistic effect of different lactic acid bacteria (mono and co-cultures) on metabolic and sensorial profile of mulberry juice. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 9364–9384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Choi, S.J.; Yang, S.Y.; Yoon, K.S. Lactic acid bacteria starter in combination with sodium chloride controls pathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC, ETEC, and EHEC) in kimchi. Food Microbiol. 2021, 100, 103868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alexandre, H.; Costello, P.J.; Remize, F.; Guzzo, J.; Guilloux-Benatier, M. Saccharomyces cerevisiaeOenococcus oeni interactions in wine: Current knowledge and perspectives. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 93, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guo, Q.; Zabed, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Yun, J.; Zhang, G.; Yang, M.; Sun, W.; Qi, X. Optimization of fermentation medium for a newly isolated yeast strain (Zygosaccharomyces rouxii JM-C46) and evaluation of factors affecting biosynthesis of D-arabitol. LWT 2019, 99, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, C.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Sun, W.; Zhao, M.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Su, G. Effects of Fermentation with Tetragenococcus halophilus and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii on the Volatile Profiles of Soybean Protein Hydrolysates. Foods 2023, 12, 4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gao, P.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Xia, W. Effect of autochthonous starter cultures on the volatile flavour compounds of Chinese traditional fermented fish (Suan yu). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1630–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, Y.; Dong, J.; Yin, H.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, R.; Wan, X.; Chen, P.; Hou, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, L. Wort composition and its impact on the flavour-active higher alcohol and ester formation of beer—A review. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, M. Dendritic Mesoporous Silica-Supported Lipase for Efficient and Sustainable Synthesis of Food-Grade Flavor Esters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 12434–12444. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chi, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Yu, L.; Wang, J. An insight into specific flavor sensation in fermented milk: Linalool and mushroom alcohol. J. Dairy Sci. 2025, 108, 5741–5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, H.; Sun, W.; Su, G. Volatile Profile and Esterification Mechanisms in Traditional Chinese Fermented Soy Sauce. Food Chem. 2020, 323, 126724. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hwang, H.S.; Ball, J.C.; Doll, K.M.; Anderson, J.E.; Vermillion, K. Investigation of polymers and alcohols produced in oxidized soybean oil at frying temperatures. Food Chem. 2020, 317, 126379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hua, Q.; Gao, P.; Xu, Y.; Xia, W.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, Q. Effect of commercial starter cultures on the quality characteristics of fermented fish-chili paste. LWT 2020, 122, 109016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guichard, H.; Poupard, P.; Legoahec, L.; Millet, M.; Bauduin, R.; Le Quéré, J.-M. Brettanomyces anomalus, a double drawback for cider aroma. LWT 2019, 102, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Paiva, A.L.; Balcão, V.M.; Malcata, F.X. Kinetics and mechanisms of reactions catalyzed by immobilized lipases. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kohl, S.; Behrens, M.; Dunkel, A.; Hofmann, T.; Meyerhof, W. Amino acids and peptides activate at least five members of the human bitter taste receptor family. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yang, X.; Hu, W.; Xiu, Z.; Jiang, A.; Yang, X.; Ji, Y.; Guan, Y.; Feng, K. Comparison of northeast sauerkraut fermentation between single lactic acid bacteria strains and traditional fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ozer, B.; Demirci, F. Determination of Microbial Dynamics and Some Metabolite Formation of Semi-Dried Tarhana Produced from Home-Made Yoghurt. Food Chem. 2025, 378, 131932. [Google Scholar]
  63. Dan, T.; Wang, D.; Jin, R.L.; Zhang, H.P.; Zhou, T.T.; Sun, T.S. Characterization of volatile compounds in fermented milk using solid-phase microextraction methods coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 2488–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dan, T.; Wang, D.; Wu, S.; Jin, R.; Ren, W.; Sun, T. Profiles of volatile flavor compounds in milk fermented with different proportional combinations of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus. Molecules 2017, 22, 1633. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kapp, J.M.; Sikora, A.E. Komagataeibacter fermentation of winemaking byproducts to produce kombucha vinegar: Chemical composition and bioactivity. LWT 2024, 203, 116370. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lima, M.; de Oliveira, H.L.; de Almeida, P.Z.; de Almeida, R.A.; de Almeida, R.B.; Teixeira, J.A.; Silva, R. Unraveling microbial succession and metabolic pathways in artisanal kombucha fermentations. Food Res. Int. 2025, 191, 114678. [Google Scholar]
  67. Neffe-Skocinska, K.; Sionek, B.; Scibisz, I.; Kolozyn-Krajewska, D. Acid contents and the effect of fermentation condition of Kombucha tea beverages on physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties. CyTA J. Food. 2017, 15, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Garofalo, C.; Ferrocino, I.; Reale, A.; Sabbatini, R.; Milanović, V.; Alkić-Subašić, M.; Boscaino, F.; Aquilanti, L.; Pasquini, M.; Trombetta, M.F.; et al. Study of kefir drinks produced by backslopping method using kefir grains from Bosnia and Herzegovina: Microbial dynamics and volatilome profile. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Singh, P.K.; Shah, N.P. Other Fermented Dairy Products: Kefir and Koumiss; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; ISBN 9780128052723. [Google Scholar]
  70. Anfiteatro, D.N. Dom’s all about Kefir in-site. Electron. J. Food Ferment. 2020, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  71. Karaoğlan, S.Y.; Jung, R.; Jelínek, L.; Karabín, M.; Kinčl, T.; Dostálek, P. Aroma Potential of a New Maltose-Negative Yeast Isolate. Foods 2025, 14, 3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Park, M.K.; Cho, I.H.; Lee, S.R.; Choi, H.-K.; Kwon, D.-Y.; Kim, Y.-S. Metabolite profiling of Cheonggukjang, a fermented soybean paste, during fermentation by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and principal component analysis. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 1313–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Y.; Du, S.; Sun, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Sun, P. Volatile Metabolomics and Metagenomics Reveal the Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Alfalfa Silage Quality, Microbial Communities, and Volatile Organic Compounds. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lu, X.; Yang, C.; Yang, Y.; Peng, B. Analysis of the Formation of Characteristic Aroma Compounds by Amino Acid Metabolic Pathways during Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecules 2023, 28, 3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, J.N.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Huang, X.; Wang, H.P.; Dong, X.; Zhu, B.; Qin, L. Analysis of lipid molecule profiling and conversion pathway in mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) during fermentation via untargeted lipidomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 8673–8684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xu, Y.; Wu, M.; Niu, J.; Lin, M.; Zhu, H.; Wang, K.; Li, X.; Sun, B. Characteristics and Correlation of the Microbial Communities and Flavor Compounds during the First Three Rounds of Fermentation in Chinese Sauce-Flavor Baijiu. Foods 2023, 12, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nguyen, P.-T.; Nguyen, T.-T.; Bui, D.-C.; Hong, P.-T.; Hoang, Q.-K.; Nguyen, H.-T. Exopolysaccharide Production by Lactic Acid Bacteria: The Manipulation of Environmental Stresses for Industrial Applications. AIMS Microbiol. 2020, 6, 451–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhang, J.; Yao, Y.; Li, J.; Ju, X.; Wang, L. Impact of Exopolysaccharides-Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Chemical, Rheological Properties of Buckwheat Sourdough and the Quality of Buckwheat Bread. Food Chem. 2023, 422, 136369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, K.; Liu, S.; Tang, H.; Evivie, S.E.; Guo, Z.; Li, B. Effect of Exopolysaccharides Yield and Addition Concentration of Lactobacillus helveticus on the Processing Characteristics of Fermented Milk and Its Mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liang, S.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; Liu, L. Biological Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides and Their Applications in the Food and Pharmaceutical Industries. Foods 2024, 13, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gentès, M.-C.; St-Gelais, D.; Turgeon, S.L. Gel Formation and Rheological Properties of Fermented Milk with in Situ Exopolysaccharide Production by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2011, 91, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, M.; Li, X.; Ye, T.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X. Safety Evaluation of Weissella confusa SY628 and the Effect of Its Fermentation on the Taste and Quality of Soy Yogurt. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1567399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, F.; Ding, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, G.; Deng, S.; Gao, M.; Liu, H.; Lv, W.; Zeng, X.; Xin, B.; et al. Mycoidesin, a novel lantibiotic, exhibits potent bacteriostatic activity against Listeria monocytogenes and effectively controls its growth in beef. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e00067-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mokoena, M.P.; Mutanda, T.; Olaniran, A.O. Perspectives on the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from African traditional fermented foods and beverages. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 60, 29630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Huang, X.; Yu, S.; Han, B.; Chen, J. Bacterial community succession and metabolite changes during sufu fermentation. LWT 2018, 97, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hu, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zeng, X. Multi-omics Analysis Reveals the Microbial Interactions of S. cerevisiae and L. plantarum on Suanyu, Chinese Traditional Fermented Fish. Food Res. Int. 2023, 174, 113525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, S.; Lou, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Cao, M.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Gu, Q. Multi-omics Analyses of the Mechanism for Formation of Key Aroma-Active Compounds in Blood Orange Wine Fermented by Pichia kudriavzevii. Food Res. Int. 2024, 198, 115321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yuan, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xie, X.; Wu, Q. Gut Microbiota-Mediated Antihypertensive Effects of Probiotic Fermented Milk: A Multi-Omics Study. J. Food Sci. 2025, 90, e70654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Wu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Jin, J.; Tong, S.; Li, S.; Zhang, L. Multi-omics analyses of the mechanism for the formation of soy sauce-like and soybean flavor in Bacillus subtilis BJ3-2. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hu, S.; He, C.; Li, Y.; Yu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ni, D. Changes of fungal community and non-volatile metabolites during pile-fermentation of dark green tea. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wu, X.; Luo, D.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, L.; Crabbe, M.J.C.; Qiao, Q.; Li, G.; Zhang, T. Integrative Analysis of the Metabolome and Transcriptome Reveals the Potential Mechanism of Fruit Flavor Formation in Wild Hawthorn (Crataegus chungtienensis). Plant Divers. 2023, 45, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mohammadi-Shemirani, P.; Sood, T.; Pare, G. From ‘Omics to multi-omics technologies: The discovery of novel causal mediators. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2023, 25, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kang, J.; Xue, Y.; Chen, X.; Han, B.Z. Integrated multi-omics approaches to understand microbiome assembly in Jiuqu, a mixed-culture starter. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 4076–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chen, G.M.; Huang, Z.R.; Wu, L.; Wu, Q.; Guo, W.L.; Zhao, W.H.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Rao, P.F.; Lv, X.C.; et al. Microbial diversity and flavour of Chinese rice wine (Huangjiu): An overview of current research and future prospects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 42, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Song, H.S.; Whon, T.W.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, Y.B.; Choi, H.J.; Rhee, J.K.; Roh, S.W. Microbial niches in raw ingredients determine microbial community assembly during kimchi fermentation. Food Chem. 2020, 318, 126481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Medina, E.; Ruiz-Bellido, M.A.; Romero-Gil, V.; Rodríguez-Gómez, F.; Montes-Borrego, M.; Landa, B.B.; Arroyo-López, F.N. Assessment of the bacterial community in directly brined Aloreña de Málaga table olive fermentations by metagenetic analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 236, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, Q.; Chu, H.; Padmanabhan, A.; Shah, N.P. Functional genomic analyses of exopolysaccharide-producing Streptococcus thermophilus ASCC 1275 in response to milk fermentation conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, L.; Gong, S.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, J.; Xu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, J.L.; Li, N. Soybean fermentation drives the production of native neuroprotective peptides based on a peptidomics strategy. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2025, 10, 101082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. He, C.; Yang, S.; Dong, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Xu, D.; Yang, R.; Zeng, B.; Hu, Y.; et al. Fermentation-driven microbial and metabolic shifts in filler tobacco leaves of different grades. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1651289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hsieh, Y.E.; Tandon, K.; Verbruggen, H.; Nikoloski, Z. Integration of Metatranscriptomics Data Improves the Predictive Capacity of Microbial Community Metabolic Models. mSystems 2025, 10, wraf109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Cocolin, L.; Mataragas, M.; Bourdichon, F.; Doulgeraki, A.; Pilet, M.F.; Jagadeesan, B.; Rantsiou, K.; Phister, T. Next generation microbiological risk assessment meta-omics: The next need for integration. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 287, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lee, S.H.; Whon, T.W.; Roh, S.W.; Jeon, C.O. Unraveling microbial fermentation features in kimchi: From classical to meta-omics approaches. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 7731–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Liu, M.-K.; Tang, Y.-M.; Guo, X.-J.; Zhao, K.; Penttinen, P.; Tian, X.-H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Ren, D.-Q.; Zhang, X.-P. Structural and functional changes in prokaryotic communities in artificial pit mud during Chinese baijiu production. mSystems 2020, 5, e0082919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pan, M.; Barrangou, R. Combining omics technologies with CRISPR-based genome editing to study food microbes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Amer, B.; Baidoo, E.E.K. Omics-driven biotechnology for industrial applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 613307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Multi-omics research strategy for analyzing microbial interactions in fermented foods.
Figure 1. Multi-omics research strategy for analyzing microbial interactions in fermented foods.
Microorganisms 13 02679 g001
Figure 2. Forms of microbial interactions. (A) Mutualism: Two microorganisms mutually provide substances essential for survival (such as metabolites and enzymes), thereby promoting each other’s growth and forming a stable symbiotic relationship; (B) Competition: Two microorganisms compete for limited resources (such as nutrients or space), with one gaining the upper hand by secreting inhibitory substances or proliferating rapidly, thereby suppressing the growth of the weaker counterpart; (C) Amensalism: One microorganism releases harmful substances (such as toxins or enzymes) to inhibit the growth of another microorganism, while remaining unaffected itself; (D) Commensalism: One microorganism benefits (e.g., by gaining shelter or nutrients), while the other remains unaffected.
Figure 2. Forms of microbial interactions. (A) Mutualism: Two microorganisms mutually provide substances essential for survival (such as metabolites and enzymes), thereby promoting each other’s growth and forming a stable symbiotic relationship; (B) Competition: Two microorganisms compete for limited resources (such as nutrients or space), with one gaining the upper hand by secreting inhibitory substances or proliferating rapidly, thereby suppressing the growth of the weaker counterpart; (C) Amensalism: One microorganism releases harmful substances (such as toxins or enzymes) to inhibit the growth of another microorganism, while remaining unaffected itself; (D) Commensalism: One microorganism benefits (e.g., by gaining shelter or nutrients), while the other remains unaffected.
Microorganisms 13 02679 g002
Figure 3. Microbial Interactions and Their Functional Metabolites in Fermented Foods.
Figure 3. Microbial Interactions and Their Functional Metabolites in Fermented Foods.
Microorganisms 13 02679 g003
Figure 4. Schematic Diagram of Multi-Omics Integration. (A) Genomics: Investigating the structure, function, and mechanisms governing the transmission and regulation of genetic information across all genomes within cells and tissues; (B) Proteomics: Study the expression, modification and interactions of all proteins within cells or tissues; (C) Transcriptomics: Research into the expression and regulation of all RNA within cells/tissues; (D) Metabolomics: Study the composition and dynamic changes of all metabolites in cells/tissues.
Figure 4. Schematic Diagram of Multi-Omics Integration. (A) Genomics: Investigating the structure, function, and mechanisms governing the transmission and regulation of genetic information across all genomes within cells and tissues; (B) Proteomics: Study the expression, modification and interactions of all proteins within cells or tissues; (C) Transcriptomics: Research into the expression and regulation of all RNA within cells/tissues; (D) Metabolomics: Study the composition and dynamic changes of all metabolites in cells/tissues.
Microorganisms 13 02679 g004
Figure 5. A multi-dimensional technical framework for flavor formation and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) metabolism in fermented dairy products.
Figure 5. A multi-dimensional technical framework for flavor formation and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) metabolism in fermented dairy products.
Microorganisms 13 02679 g005
Table 1. Types of Microbial Metabolism.
Table 1. Types of Microbial Metabolism.
Metabolic TypeSpecific Metabolic PathwaysMetabolic Microorganism
Glycometabolic pathwayGlycolysis (EMP pathway)Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus
Tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle)Aerobic/Facultative aerobic microorganisms (Escherichia coli, yeast, Acetobacter)
Pentose phosphate pathwayYeast, Escherichia coli, cyanobacteria, actinomycetes
Acetaldehyde cycleEscherichia coli, rhizobia, certain fungi (such as Aspergillus niger)
Lipid and Fatty Acid MetabolismFatty acid synthesisYeast, Escherichia coli, Actinomycetes, plant pathogenic fungi (such as Fusarium)
Fatty acid β-oxidationAerobic microorganisms (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas) Facultative anaerobic microorganisms (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Glycerol metabolismEscherichia coli, yeast, lactic acid bacteria
Polysaccharide degradationStarch hydrolysisBacillus subtilis, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Rhizopus
Cellulose decompositionMucor, cellulose-degrading bacteria (such as Clostridium thermofibrinolyticum), certain actinomycetes (such as Streptomyces), and the gut microbiota of termites
PectinaseAspergillus niger, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pectoralis
glycogenolysisEscherichia coli, yeast, certain bacteria (such as streptococci)
Table 2. Research Findings on Fermented Foods via Multi-Omics Approaches.
Table 2. Research Findings on Fermented Foods via Multi-Omics Approaches.
Fermented FoodsMulti-Omics ApproachesSignificant FindingsReferences
Fermented soybeansTranscriptome analysis and proteome analysisMain metabolic pathways involved carbohydrates, proteins, and amino acids.[64]
Fermented fishTranscriptomics and Metabolomics analysesDuring microbial interactions, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum produce antibiotics that influence carbohydrate and energy metabolism.[86]
Light-flavor BaijiuMetagenomics and Metabolomicsalcohols and esters were the most abundant metabolites.[65]
Blood orange winevolatilomics, genomics, and transcriptomicsEnhanced the complexity and appeal of the aroma; a substantial portion of the P. kudriavzevii BP15 genome is dedicated to carbohydrate, amino acid, and energy metabolism.[87]
Fermented MilkMetagenomics and MetabolomicsPotential Mechanism Underlying the Hypotensive Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum SR37-3 (PFM-SR37-3) Fermented Milk in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats (SHR)[88]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ji, J.; Jiang, X.; Song, P.; Yang, Q.; Sun, M.; Dong, Z.; Lu, Y.; Dou, S.; Dong, L. Multi-Omics Insights into Microbial Interactions and Fermented Food Quality. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122679

AMA Style

Ji J, Jiang X, Song P, Yang Q, Sun M, Dong Z, Lu Y, Dou S, Dong L. Multi-Omics Insights into Microbial Interactions and Fermented Food Quality. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(12):2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ji, Jiayi, Xinyue Jiang, Panpan Song, Qi Yang, Mengying Sun, Zhihui Dong, Yi Lu, Shaohua Dou, and Liang Dong. 2025. "Multi-Omics Insights into Microbial Interactions and Fermented Food Quality" Microorganisms 13, no. 12: 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122679

APA Style

Ji, J., Jiang, X., Song, P., Yang, Q., Sun, M., Dong, Z., Lu, Y., Dou, S., & Dong, L. (2025). Multi-Omics Insights into Microbial Interactions and Fermented Food Quality. Microorganisms, 13(12), 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop