Next Article in Journal
Biocontrol Potential, Plant Growth-Promotion, and Genomic Insights of Pseudomonas koreensis CHHM-1 Against Bacterial Canker in Actinidia arguta
Previous Article in Journal
Migration Characteristics of Manure-Derived Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Vegetables Under Different Soil Types
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ST8 and ST72 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Bacteremia in Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics

by
Yun Woo Lee
1,2,
Ji-Hun Kim
3,
So Yun Lim
4,
Euijin Chang
4,
Seongman Bae
4,
Jiwon Jung
4,
Min Jae Kim
4,
Yong Pil Chong
4,
Sung-Han Kim
4,
Sang-Ho Choi
4,
Sang-Oh Lee
4 and
Yang Soo Kim
4,5,*
1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Medicine, Graduate School, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu 11765, Republic of Korea
4
Division of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
5
Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genetics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(10), 2399; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102399
Submission received: 25 September 2025 / Revised: 16 October 2025 / Accepted: 17 October 2025 / Published: 20 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Microbiology)

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a major cause of bloodstream infection worldwide. In Korea, sequence type (ST) 72 has predominated, whereas ST8, including the USA300 lineage, has recently emerged. Comparative data on these genotypes in MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) are limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with MRSAB admitted to a 2700-bed tertiary care hospital in Republic of Korea between July 2008 and December 2020. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with ST8 MRSA were compared with those of patients with ST72 MRSA. Among 1975 cases of S. aureus bacteremia, 998 (50.5%) were due to MRSA, including 327 (32.7%) ST72 and 23 (2.3%) ST8 isolates. Demographics and comorbidities were similar, though pneumonia appeared more frequent in ST8 cases without statistical significance. ST8 isolates exhibited greater resistance to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin and more frequent vancomycin E-test MICs ≥1 mg/L, while broth microdilution MICs were comparable. spa type distribution differed, with t324 predominating in ST72 and t008 in ST8. Management practices, persistent bacteremia, recurrence, and 30- and 90-day mortality did not differ significantly. In multivariable analysis, liver cirrhosis and Charlson comorbidity index >4, but not MRSA genotype, independently predicted 30-day mortality. These findings highlight the importance of continued surveillance of emerging ST8 clones.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus remains a major human pathogen responsible for a broad spectrum of community- and healthcare-associated infections worldwide [1]. Since the introduction of antibiotics, the organism has acquired resistance to multiple agents, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a major healthcare problem [2,3]. MRSA initially emerged as a predominant cause of hospital- and healthcare-associated infections [1,4]. In the late 1990s, however, community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) clones became widespread, with sequence type (ST) 8-Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome (SCC)mec IVa (USA300) rapidly establishing itself as the predominant lineage in the United States and subsequently spreading globally [5,6,7]. USA300 strains are typically Panton–Valentine leucocidin (PVL)-positive and have been strongly associated with skin and soft tissue infections, but they are also capable of causing severe invasive infections such as necrotizing pneumonia, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and bacteremia [7].
In contrast, the epidemiology of MRSA in Republic of Korea has been distinct. PVL-negative ST72-SCCmec IVc has been the predominant CA-MRSA clone in both community and healthcare settings [8,9,10]. Recently, however, ST8 lineages including USA300 have begun to emerge in Korea. Sporadic cases of USA300 infection were first reported in 2008 in a patient with a travel history to Hawaii, followed by additional cases without overseas exposure, implying in-country acquisition [11,12,13,14]. A multicenter Korean study identified PVL-positive ST8-MRSA (USA300) accounting for 0.4–12% of MRSA bacteremia across three centers, a range higher than expected [15]. Longitudinal surveillance has further demonstrated a steady increase in ST8 isolates, raising concerns about their potential expansion in both community and hospital settings [8]. Similar trends have been documented in neighboring countries such as Japan, where a distinct ST8 clone (ST8 CA-MRSA/J) with close genetic similarity to USA300 but unique virulence gene content has emerged and caused severe invasive infections [16]. In Taiwan as well, recent studies have reported a rising prevalence of USA300-like clones, underscoring the need for ongoing regional and global surveillance of these lineages [17].
Despite these observations, comparative studies of ST8 and ST72 in invasive infections remain scarce in Korea. In this study, we evaluated the clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes of MRSA bacteremia caused by ST8 and compared them with those caused by ST72, the long-dominant community genotype in Korea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a previously established institutional cohort of adult patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) admitted to a 2700-bed tertiary care hospital (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea) between July 2008 and December 2020. All consecutive patients with a first episode of SAB were eligible. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) age under 18 years, (ii) discharge before culture results were available, which precluded outcome assessment, (iii) polymicrobial bacteremia, (iv) a previous episode of SAB within the preceding 90 days, (v) receipt of ≥3 days of treatment at another hospital, (vi) clinically insignificant bacteremia, defined as a single positive blood culture without signs or symptoms of infection that resolved without anti-staphylococcal therapy, and (vii) identification in outpatient settings. Clinical data, demographics, main focus of infection, and test results of metastatic infection, were collected within one week of the initial positive culture. All SAB cases were then reviewed by infectious disease specialists. Outcomes, including duration of bacteremia, recurrence, and death, were assessed through medical record review up to 90 days after the first positive culture. This study specifically analyzed and compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes MRSA bacteremia caused by ST8 and ST72 isolates within this institutional cohort.

2.2. Laboratory and Microbiological Data

All S. aureus isolates were identified using the standard methods recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and confirmed by morphological and biochemical testing, including the slide coagulase assay, or by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry [18]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was interpreted according to standard criteria using the MicroScan system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) in accordance with the CLSI guidelines [18]. Methicillin resistance was determined based on oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and the detection of the mecA gene. Vancomycin MICs were assessed by both the broth microdilution (BMD) method and E test. BMD was performed following CLSI recommendations, whereas E test was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol using vancomycin E test strips (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), assessment of δ-hemolysin activity for evaluation of accessory gene regulator (agr) function, and staphylococcal protein A (spa) genotyping were conducted as previously described [19,20,21]. These molecular analyses were performed on all MRSA isolates collected between July 2008 and December 2020.

2.3. Data Collection and Definitions

Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect data on age, sex, mode of acquisition, medical history, site of infection, severity at admission, microbiological results, and clinical outcomes for all enrolled patients. The mode of acquisition was categorized as community-acquired, community-onset healthcare-associated, or nosocomial, in accordance with the Friedman criteria [22]. The cause (main focus) of bacteremia was determined for each patient based on clinical, microbiological, and radiological findings, and classified as catheter-related, skin and soft tissue, bone and joint, pneumonia, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, arteriovenous graft infection, or primary bacteremia. Metastatic infection was defined as a newly developed sterile-site infection that was not clinically apparent at the time of the initial blood culture and was not identified during the initial diagnostic workup. The primary focus of infection was determined by infectious disease specialists based on microbiological evidence, radiological findings, and clinical course. The duration of bacteremia was defined as the interval between the first and last positive SAB culture, regardless of antimicrobial therapy. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of signs and symptoms of infection more than 7 days after clinical improvement with confirmed negative blood cultures.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data manipulation and statistical analyses were conducted using R, version 4.0.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-squared test with simulated p-values, as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify independent risk factors for mortality. Multivariate models were adjusted for the following covariates: age ≥ 65, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease, chronic lung disease, solid cancer, hematologic malignancy, solid organ transplantation, ischemic heart disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) > 4, focus of infection, presence of metastatic infection, and status of infection focus removal. To minimize small-sample bias due to the limited number of ST8 cases and zero 30-day deaths, Firth penalized and exact logistic regression analyses were additionally performed, including the prespecified covariates (ST type, age > 60, CCI > 4, and infection severity). Post hoc power for 30-day mortality difference was calculated (α = 0.05) with effect size expressed as Cohen’s h. Temporal trends in the annual proportions of ST72 and ST8 MRSA among SAB cases were analyzed using ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and logistic regression with calendar year as a continuous variable. Yearly trends in the proportion of isolates with vancomycin MIC > 1 mg/L (by BMD and E-test) were also evaluated using binomial logistic regression, reporting odds ratios (ORs) per year with 95% confidence intervals. Because only 8 of 17 isolates in 2020 had available E-test results, MIC trend analyses were restricted to data up to 2019. To assess the potential clinical impact of vancomycin MIC, outcomes were further compared between isolates with MIC ≤1 mg/L and >1 mg/L. All reported p-values were two-sided, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline and Clinical Characteristics

A total of 1975 cases of SAB were identified during the study period, including 998 cases of MRSA (50.5%). ST72 and ST8 accounted for 327 (32.7%) and 23 (2.3%) of the MRSA isolates, respectively. The baseline characteristics of 350 patients with ST72 MRSA and ST8 MRSA are summarized in Table 1. Patients in both groups were of similar age (median, 64 years) and sex distribution, and the mode of acquisition did not differ significantly, with the majority of infections being healthcare-associated or hospital-acquired. The prevalence of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and solid cancer was generally comparable between the two groups. CCI scores and predisposing conditions, including recent surgery, prior antibiotic treatment, and use of immunosuppressive agents, were also similar across groups. With respect to the focus of infection, pneumonia was more common in the ST8 group (30% vs. 9.2%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Other infection sites, including catheter-related infections, bone and joint infection, skin and soft tissue infection, and endocarditis, were distributed similarly. The occurrence of metastatic infection (18% vs. 22%) and infection severity (sepsis or septic shock) did not differ significantly between ST72 and ST8 MRSA bacteremia.

3.2. Microbiological Characteristics

The microbiological characteristics and antibiotic susceptibilities of ST72 and ST8 MRSA isolates are summarized in Table 2. Overall, resistance to most antibiotics was comparable between the two groups; however, ST8 isolates demonstrated significantly higher resistance to ciprofloxacin (78% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001) and erythromycin (61% vs. 26%, p = 0.003) compared with ST72 isolates. Resistance to clindamycin (13–20%) and gentamicin (13–30%) was observed at moderate frequencies, while resistance to fusidic acid, rifampin, and tetracycline remained low (<5%), with no significant differences between ST72 and ST8 isolates. All MRSA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin according to CLSI criteria; no vancomycin-resistant strains were identified. Vancomycin MICs determined by BMD were similar between the two groups, with the majority of isolates showing an MIC of 1 mg/L. However, E-test results revealed a significantly different distribution (p < 0.001), with ST8 isolates more frequently exhibiting MIC values ≥1 mg/L. Four ST72 isolates (1.2%) showed E-test MICs of 3 mg/L, which may reflect inter-method variability, as all values remained well below the CLSI resistance breakpoint. The prevalence of agr dysfunction did not differ significantly between ST72 and ST8 (12% vs. 17%, p = 0.501). spa typing revealed distinct clonal distributions: ST72 isolates were dominated by t324 (48%), t148 (12%), and diverse other types, whereas ST8 isolates were largely associated with spa type t008 (65%).
Over the 12-year study period, the annual proportion of ST8 MRSA among SAB cases gradually increased from 1.3% in 2008 to 3.3% in 2020, whereas ST72 remained relatively stable (Figure S1, Table S3). When analyzed by 4-year intervals (2008–2012, 2013–2016, 2017–2020), the ST8 proportion showed a significant upward trend (ANOVA p = 0.02; Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.04), while no significant change was observed for ST72. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant year-on-year increase for ST8 (OR 1.30 per year, p < 0.001) but not for ST72 (OR 1.03, p = 0.06) (Figure S2, Table S4). Logistic regression demonstrated a decreasing proportion of isolates with MIC > 1 mg/L for both methods (BMD: OR = 0.82 per year, 95% CI 0.73–0.91, p < 0.001; E-test: OR = 0.86 per year, 95% CI 0.79–0.93, p < 0.001; Figure S3).
Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly according to vancomycin MIC category (≤1 vs. >1 mg/L) (Table S5).

3.3. Clinical Course and Outcome

Management and clinical outcomes of patients with MRSA bacteremia are summarized in Table 3. Most patients in both groups received vancomycin with similar rates of therapeutic drug monitoring and comparable trough levels. The use of alternative agents, time to appropriate therapy, and duration of intravenous antibiotics did not differ significantly. The frequencies of eradicable foci, focus removal, and persistent bacteremia were also similar. Clinical outcomes, including 30- and 90-day mortality, showed no significant differences between ST72 and ST8 cases. The 30-day mortality rate was 13% in the ST72 group and 0% in the ST8 group. However, due to complete separation arising from the absence of deaths in the ST8 group, ORs could not be estimated. Fisher’s exact test revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.093).
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with 30-day mortality (Table 4). In the univariable analysis, liver cirrhosis (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.52–6.73; p = 0.002), solid cancer (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.58–5.93; p < 0.001), and a CCI > 4 (OR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.44–9.21; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality. The presence of a removable focus was protective, with a significantly lower risk of 30-day mortality when the focus was removed (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.86; p = 0.021).
In the multivariable analysis, liver cirrhosis (aOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.20–6.44; p = 0.015) and CCI > 4 (aOR, 4.67; 95% CI, 2.00–11.5; p < 0.001) remained independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Removal of the infectious focus showed a trend toward reduced mortality but did not reach statistical significance (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.23–1.11; p = 0.10). Other factors, including age, sex, MRSA genotype (ST72 vs. ST8), agr dysfunction, and vancomycin MIC, were not significantly associated with 30-day mortality.
In Firth and exact logistic regression analyses, the OR for 30-day mortality in ST8 versus ST72 was 0.17 (95% CI, 0.00–1.34; p = 0.11), consistent across both models (Table S1). In addition, a post hoc power analysis demonstrated that the study had sufficient statistical power (0.958; Cohen’s h = 0.795, α = 0.05) to detect the observed absolute difference in 30-day mortality between the groups, suggesting that the non-significant results were less likely due to limited sample size (Table S2).
In both univariate and multivariable analyses, ST8 MRSA was not significantly associated with 90-day recurrence or mortality compared with ST72 MRSA (Table 5).

4. Discussion

In this study, we compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes of MRSA bacteremia caused by ST72 and ST8 isolates in Korea.
Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, comorbidities, and infection sites, were largely comparable between the two groups, which may partly explain the absence of significant differences in outcomes. Notably, pneumonia was more frequently observed among ST8 cases, echoing prior reports linking USA300-related clones with pulmonary infections [13,23]; however, in our cohort this trend did not reach statistical significance.
Microbiological analyses revealed distinct differences between the two clonal groups. ST8 isolates exhibited significantly higher resistance rates to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin and showed a predominance of spa type t008, consistent with the USA300 lineage described in other regions [5]. In contrast, ST72 isolates demonstrated more diverse spa types and lower resistance profiles. Although vancomycin MICs determined by BMD were similar between the groups, E-test results showed higher MIC distributions in ST8 isolates (mostly 1 mg/L). No vancomycin-resistant MRSA isolates (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L) were identified, and all values remained within the susceptible range by CLSI criteria [18]. This subtle upward shift underscores the need for continued surveillance of potential MIC creep [24,25]. However, this difference was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes in our study.
Despite these microbiological differences, management strategies and short-term outcomes did not differ significantly. Most patients in both groups received vancomycin therapy with therapeutic drug monitoring, and the use of alternative agents, duration of intravenous therapy, and frequency of source control procedures were comparable. Likewise, persistent bacteremia and 30- and 90-day mortality rates showed no significant differences, suggesting that clonal background exerted limited influence on treatment response or outcomes in this cohort. Nevertheless, ST8/USA300 typically harbors SCCmec IVa, arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME), and PVL genes, features that may confer enhanced virulence compared to other MRSA strains [26,27,28], whereas ST72-SCCmecIVc isolates are generally PVL-negative and their pathogenic potential remains less well defined [10,29]. Further genome-wide studies and functional analyses will be necessary to clarify the clinical implications of these clonal differences.
In this cohort, most MRSA bacteremia cases were healthcare-associated (40%) or hospital-acquired (49%), indicating that infections predominantly occurred in patients with prior healthcare exposure, such as those with vascular catheters, recent surgery, or indwelling devices. This pattern reflects the tertiary care hospital setting and aligns with known risk factors for MRSA bacteremia. Epidemiologically, ST72-SCCmecIVc has been the dominant community-associated MRSA clone in Korea since the mid-2000s but has increasingly spread into healthcare environments [10,29,30]. In contrast, ST8 MRSA, including USA300 and related variants, has emerged more recently. Although USA300 originally arose in the community in North America, recent Korean studies have identified its establishment within hospital settings, even among patients without travel history, suggesting local adaptation and circulation of hospital-associated ST8 lineages [15]. Continued genomic and epidemiological surveillance is warranted to differentiate imported USA300-like strains from locally evolved ST8 variants and to monitor their clinical and public health impact.
When risk factors for 30-day mortality were examined, host-related factors rather than bacterial genotype emerged as key determinants. Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI > 4) and underlying liver cirrhosis were independently associated with mortality, consistent with previous studies demonstrating the impact of comorbidity burden and cirrhosis on adverse outcomes in SAB [31,32]. Although the protective effect of source control did not remain statistically significant in the multivariable analysis, its clinical relevance is well supported in the literature [33,34]. Together, these findings suggest that in Korea, the prognosis of MRSA bacteremia is primarily driven by host comorbidities and adequacy of management, rather than clonal lineage.
Finally, analysis of 90-day outcomes demonstrated that ST8 was not significantly associated with increased recurrence or mortality compared with ST72. This further supports the notion that host factors, rather than clonal background, are the predominant determinants of prognosis in this setting. However, given the relatively small number of ST8 cases, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and larger multicenter studies are needed to validate them. Considering the established virulence and adverse clinical impact of USA300/ST8 in other regions [26,27,28], continued molecular epidemiologic surveillance remains essential to monitor potential shifts in clinical relevance.
This study expands upon our institution’s long-term SAB cohort, providing novel comparative insights into the clinical and microbiological distinctions between ST72 and ST8 MRSA clones—an aspect not specifically addressed in earlier analyses from the same cohort [8,10,29,32]. Through this work, we contribute further evidence to the understanding of MRSA clonal diversity and its clinical implications in Korea.
Our study had some limitations. First, it was conducted in a single center with a relatively small number of ST8 cases, which limits the generalizability of our findings and reduces the statistical power to detect subtle differences between clonal groups. In particular, the absence of 30-day mortality events in the ST8 group constrained statistical estimation, highlighting the challenges of interpreting rare outcomes in small cohorts. However, supplementary analyses using Firth and exact logistic regression, along with post hoc power estimation, demonstrated that our findings were robust and not substantially affected by small-sample bias. Second, the retrospective design introduces potential information bias and confounding, particularly regarding the assessment of clinical management such as adequacy of source control. In addition, the exclusion of patients diagnosed outside the hospital or transferred after more than three days may have introduced selection bias; however, these criteria were applied to ensure consistency in microbiological testing, antimicrobial stewardship, and clinical management within a single institutional framework. Third, detailed genotypic information such as PVL, ACME, and SCCmec subtypes was not available due to the retrospective nature of the study and limited sample availability. As a result, molecular confirmation of ST8 isolates as USA300 or locally evolved ST8 variants was not possible. The absence of these molecular data, together with the lack of virulence gene profiling or whole-genome sequencing, precluded a more comprehensive evaluation of clonal virulence characteristics and their potential impact on clinical outcomes. Further genomic characterization will be important to clarify the genetic relatedness of emerging ST8 strains in Korea and their potential epidemiologic significance. Therefore, our findings should be interpreted with caution, and larger, prospective, multicenter studies incorporating advanced molecular analyses are warranted to validate and extend these results.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, clinical outcomes of MRSA bacteremia did not differ significantly between ST72 and ST8 isolates in Korea, despite distinct microbiological profiles. Mortality was mainly driven by host comorbidities such as liver cirrhosis and high CCI rather than clonal background. Although the small number of ST8 cases limits definitive interpretation, continued molecular surveillance is warranted to monitor the potential clinical impact of emerging ST8 clones.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13102399/s1, Figure S1. Yearly distribution of SAB, MRSA, ST72, and ST8 (2008–2020). Figure S2. Proportion of ST72, and ST8 across study periods (2008–2012, 2013–2016, 2017–2020). Figure S3. Proportion of isolates with MIC >1 mg/L by year. Table S1. Comparison of Firth and Exact Logistic Regression for 30-day Mortality (ST72 vs. ST8). Table S2. Post-hoc Power Analysis for 30-day Mortality (ST72 vs. ST8 MRSA bacteremia). Table S3. Yearly numbers and proportions of ST72 and ST8 among total S. aureus bacteremia. Table S4. Temporal trend analysis of ST72 and ST8 MRSA among S. aureus bacteremia cases (2008–2020). Table S5. Outcomes according to vancomycin MIC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.K. and Y.W.L.; methodology, Y.S.K. and Y.W.L.; software, J.-H.K.; validation, S.Y.L., S.B., and Y.P.C.; formal analysis, J.-H.K.; investigation, Y.W.L., and S.B.; resources, J.J., M.J.K., S.-H.K., and S.-H.C.; data curation, Y.W.L., J.-H.K., and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.K., S.-O.L.; visualization, Y.W.L., and J.-H.K.; supervision, E.C.,S.Y.L., Y.P.C., J.J., M.J.K., S.-H.K., S.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center (IRB No. 2013-0234, approved on 22 March 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Due to its retrospective design, the requirement for informed consent was waived, and all identifiable patient information was encrypted and anonymized prior to analysis.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MRSAMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
STSequence type
CA-MRSACommunity-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
PVLPanton–Valentine leucocidin
SABS. aureus bacteremia
MICMinimum inhibitory concentration
BMDBroth microdilution
MLSTMultilocus sequence typing
agraccessory gene regulator
spastaphylococcal protein A
CCICharlson Comorbidity Index
OROdds ratio
SCCStaphylococcal Chromosomal Cassette
ACMEArginine Catabolic Mobile Element

References

  1. Lowy, F.D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chambers, H.F.; Deleo, F.R. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lakhundi, S.; Zhang, K. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00020-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grundmann, H.; Aires-de-Sousa, M.; Boyce, J.; Tiemersma, E. Emergence and resurgence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public-health threat. Lancet 2006, 368, 874–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diekema, D.J.; Richter, S.S.; Heilmann, K.P.; Dohrn, C.L.; Riahi, F.; Tendolkar, S.; McDanel, J.S.; Doern, G.V. Continued emergence of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: Results from a nationwide surveillance study. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2014, 35, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Diep, B.A.; Otto, M. The role of virulence determinants in community-associated MRSA pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nimmo, G.R. USA300 abroad: Global spread of a virulent strain of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Choi, S.H.; Lee, J.; Jung, J.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, M.J.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.O.; Choi, S.H.; Woo, J.H.; et al. A Longitudinal Study of Adult Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia over 11 Years in Korea. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2021, 36, e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Park, C.; Lee, D.-G.; Kim Sun, W.; Choi, S.-M.; Park Sun, H.; Chun, H.-S.; Choi, J.-H.; Yoo, J.-H.; Shin Wan, S.; Kang Jin, H.; et al. Predominance of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Carrying Staphylococcal Chromosome Cassette mec Type IVA in South Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 4021–4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, Y.W.; Bae, S.; Yang, E.; Chung, H.; Kim, E.; Jung, J.; Kim, M.J.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.H.; Choi, S.H.; et al. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Hospital-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Caused by a Community-Associated PVL-Negative Strain. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, C.; Lee, D.-G.; Choi, S.-M.; Park, S.H.; Choi, J.-H.; Yoo, J.-H.; Hur, J.A.; Shin, W.-S. A Case of Perianal Abscess due to Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Positive Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Report in Korea and Literature Review from the Far East. Infect. Chemother. 2008, 40, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lim, S.; Chung, D.R.; Baek, J.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Peck, K.R.; Lee, N.Y.; Song, J.H. A third case of USA300 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Korea. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2013, 28, 258–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sohn, K.M.; Chung, D.R.; Baek, J.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Joo, E.J.; Ha, Y.E.; Ko, K.S.; Kang, C.I.; Peck, K.R.; Song, J.H. Post-influenza pneumonia caused by the USA300 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2012, 27, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, H.; Kim, E.S.; Choi, C.; Seo, H.; Shin, M.; Bok, J.H.; Cho, J.E.; Kim, C.J.; Shin, J.W.; Kim, T.S.; et al. Outbreak among healthy newborns due to a new variant of USA300-related meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hosp. Infect. 2014, 87, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jung, J.; Song, E.H.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, S.R.; Park, S.J.; Sung, H.; Kim, M.N.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.O.; Choi, S.H.; et al. Emergence of Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive ST8-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (USA300 clone) in Korea causing healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired bacteraemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 35, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iwao, Y.; Ishii, R.; Tomita, Y.; Shibuya, Y.; Takano, T.; Hung, W.C.; Higuchi, W.; Isobe, H.; Nishiyama, A.; Yano, M.; et al. The emerging ST8 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in the community in Japan: Associated infections, genetic diversity, and comparative genomics. J. Infect. Chemother. Off. J. Jpn. Soc. Chemother. 2012, 18, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Y.C.; Chen, C.J.; Kuo, A.J.; Hwang, K.R.; Chien, C.C.; Lee, C.Y.; Wu, T.H.; Ko, W.C.; Hsueh, P.R. Dissemination of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 8 (USA300) in Taiwan. J. Hosp. Infect. 2024, 149, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 25th ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  19. Traber, K.E.; Lee, E.; Benson, S.; Corrigan, R.; Cantera, M.; Shopsin, B.; Novick, R.P. agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiology 2008, 154, 2265–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Enright, M.C.; Day, N.P.; Davies, C.E.; Peacock, S.J.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shopsin, B.; Gomez, M.; Montgomery, S.O.; Smith, D.H.; Waddington, M.; Dodge, D.E.; Bost, D.A.; Riehman, M.; Naidich, S.; Kreiswirth, B.N. Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3556–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Friedman, N.D.; Kaye, K.S.; Stout, J.E.; McGarry, S.A.; Trivette, S.L.; Briggs, J.P.; Lamm, W.; Clark, C.; MacFarquhar, J.; Walton, A.L.; et al. Health care—Associated bloodstream infections in adults: A reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002, 137, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hota, B.; Lyles, R.; Rim, J.; Popovich, K.J.; Rice, T.; Aroutcheva, A.; Weinstein, R.A.; The CDC Prevention Epicenters. Predictors of Clinical Virulence in Community-Onset Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: The Importance of USA300 and Pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sader, H.S.; Fey, P.D.; Limaye, A.P.; Madinger, N.; Pankey, G.; Rahal, J.; Rybak, M.J.; Snydman, D.R.; Steed, L.L.; Waites, K.; et al. Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin potency trends (MIC creep) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in nine U.S. medical centers from 2002 to 2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4127–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. van Hal, S.J.; Barbagiannakos, T.; Jones, M.; Wehrhahn, M.C.; Mercer, J.; Chen, D.; Paterson, D.L.; Gosbell, I.B. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin susceptibility testing: Methodology correlations, temporal trends and clonal patterns. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2284–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Diep, B.A.; Gill, S.R.; Chang, R.F.; Phan, T.H.; Chen, J.H.; Davidson, M.G.; Lin, F.; Lin, J.; Carleton, H.A.; Mongodin, E.F.; et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 2006, 367, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Voyich, J.M.; Otto, M.; Mathema, B.; Braughton, K.R.; Whitney, A.R.; Welty, D.; Long, R.D.; Dorward, D.W.; Gardner, D.J.; Lina, G.; et al. Is Panton-Valentine leukocidin the major virulence determinant in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease? J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 194, 1761–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kreisel, K.M.; Stine, O.C.; Johnson, J.K.; Perencevich, E.N.; Shardell, M.D.; Lesse, A.J.; Gordin, F.M.; Climo, M.W.; Roghmann, M.C. USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and the risk of severe sepsis: Is USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with more severe infections? Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 70, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, K.H.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.O.; Choi, S.H.; Lee, M.S.; Jeong, J.Y.; Woo, J.H.; Kim, Y.S. Community-associated MRSA strain ST72-SCCmecIV causing bloodstream infections: Clinical outcomes and bacterial virulence factors. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Joo, E.J.; Chung, D.R.; Kim, S.H.; Baek, J.Y.; Lee, N.Y.; Cho, S.Y.; Ha, Y.E.; Kang, C.I.; Peck, K.R.; Song, J.H. Emergence of Community-Genotype Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korean Hospitals: Clinical Characteristics of Nosocomial Infections by Community-Genotype Strain. Infect. Chemother. 2017, 49, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. van Hal, S.J.; Jensen, S.O.; Vaska, V.L.; Espedido, B.A.; Paterson, D.L.; Gosbell, I.B. Predictors of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 362–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Park, H.J.; Lee, Y.M.; Bang, K.M.; Park, S.Y.; Moon, S.M.; Park, K.H.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.O.; Choi, S.H.; et al. Clinical significance of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 31, 3309–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Minejima, E.; Mai, N.; Bui, N.; Mert, M.; Mack, W.J.; She, R.C.; Nieberg, P.; Spellberg, B.; Wong-Beringer, A. Defining the Breakpoint Duration of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Predictive of Poor Outcomes. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2020, 70, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tong, S.Y.C.; Fowler, V.G., Jr.; Skalla, L.; Holland, T.L. Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Review. JAMA 2025, 334, 798–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Baseline and clinical characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline and clinical characteristics.
VariableST72 (n = 327)ST8 (n = 23)Total (n = 350)p
Age (years), median [IQR] 64 [53, 72]64 [57, 74]64 [54, 72]0.323
  Age > 60 years197/327 (60%)16/23 (70%)213/350 (61%)0.508
Male 198/327 (61%)15/23 (65%)213/350 (61%)0.826
Mode of acquisition 0.783
  Community-acquired 36/327 (11%)3/23 (13%)39/350 (11%)
  Healthcare-associated130/327 (40%)10/23 (43%)140/350 (40%)
  Hospital-acquired161/327 (49%)10/23 (43%)171/350 (49%)
Comorbidities
  Hypertension145/327 (44%)14/23 (61%)159/350 (45%)0.135
  Diabetes mellitus119/327 (36%)13/23 (57%)132/350 (38%)0.074
  Liver cirrhosis47/327 (14%)2/23 (8.7%)49/350 (14%)0.754
  End-stage renal disease50/327 (15%)5/23 (22%)55/350 (16%)0.381
  Chronic lung disease a7/327 (2.1%)0/23 (0%)7/350 (2.0%)>0.999
  Solid cancer123/327 (38%)6/23 (26%)129/350 (37%)0.372
  Hematologic malignancy31/327 (9.5%)1/23 (4.3%)32/350 (9.1%)0.708
  Solid organ transplantation14/327 (4.3%)0/23 (0%)14/350 (4.0%)0.611
  Ischemic heart disease36/327 (11%)0/23 (0%)36/350 (10%)0.149
CCI, median [IQR] 2 [2, 5]2 [1, 4]2 [2, 5]0.136
  CCI > 484/327 (26%)5/23 (22%)89/350 (25%)0.807
Predisposing condition
  Recent surgery b53/327 (16%)2/23 (8.7%)55/350 (16%)0.552
  Prior antibiotic treatment b 109/327 (33%)4/23 (17%)113/350 (32%)0.165
  Neutropenia17/327 (5.2%)0/23 (0%)17/350 (4.9%)0.615
  Anticancer chemotherapy60/327 (18%)3/23 (13%)63/350 (18%)0.779
  Immunosuppressive treatment b 83/327 (25%)2/23 (8.7%)85/350 (24%)0.081
  Central venous catheter 96/327 (29%)7/23 (30%)103/350 (29%)>0.999
  Non-catheter indwelling devices 65/327 (20%)8/23 (35%)73/350 (21%)0.109
  Cardiac implantable electronic device4/327 (1.2%)2/23 (8.7%)6/350 (1.7%)0.053
  Prosthetic heart valve12/327 (3.7%)0/23 (0%)12/350 (3.4%)>0.999
  Vascular graft36/327 (11%)5/23 (22%)41/350 (12%)0.168
  Orthopedic implant14/327 (4.3%)2/23 (8.7%)16/350 (4.6%)0.283
  Others9/327 (2.8%)1/23 (4.3%)10/350 (2.9%)0.498
Main focus of infection
  Central catheter related 62/327 (19%)2/23 (8.7%)64/350 (18%)0.160
  Peripheral catheter related23/327 (7.0%)0/23 (0%)23/350 (6.6%)
  Primary bacteremia (unidentified)52/327 (16%)4/23 (17%)56/350 (16%)
  Pneumonia 30/327 (9.2%)7/23 (30%)37/350 (11%)
  Bone and joint infection 36/327 (11%)2/23 (8.7%)38/350 (11%)
  Surgical wound 20/327 (6.1%)0/23 (0%)20/350 (5.7%)
  Skin and soft tissue28/327 (8.6%)2/23 (8.7%)30/350 (8.6%)
  Endocarditis 14/327 (4.3%)0/23 (0%)14/350 (4.0%)
  Urinary tract 8/327 (2.4%)1/23 (4.3%)9/350 (2.6%)
  Arteriovenous graft17/327 (5.2%)2/23 (8.7%)19/350 (5.4%)
  Others37/327 (11%)3/23 (13%)40/350 (11%)
Metastatic infection 60/327 (18%)5/23 (22%)65/350 (19%)0.781
Severity of infection
  No sepsis66/326 (20%)5/23 (22%)71/349 (20%)
  Sepsis225/326 (69%)15/23 (65%)240/349 (69%)
  Septic shock c35/326 (11%)3/23 (13%)38/349 (11%)
Data are presented as the number of patients (%), unless otherwise indicated. ST, sequence type; IQR, interquartile range; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index. a Includes chronic pulmonary obstructive lung disease and bronchiectasis. b Within a month before MRSA bacteremia. c Sepsis with persistent hypotension that requires vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg, and lactate level ≥ 2 mmol/L despite adequate fluid resuscitation.
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance profile and microbiological characteristics.
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance profile and microbiological characteristics.
CharacteristicST72 (n = 327)ST8 (n = 23)Total (n = 350)p
Antibiotics resistance
  Clindamycin 65/327 (20%)3/23 (13%)68/350 (19%)0.615
  Ciprofloxacin 29/327 (8.9%)18/23 (78%)47/350 (13%)<0.001
  Erythromycin 84/327 (26%)14/23 (61%)98/350 (28%)0.003
  Fusidic acid 6/327 (1.8%)1/23 (4.3%)7/350 (2.0%)0.564
  Gentamicin 44/327 (13%)7/23 (30%)51/350 (15%)0.111
  Rifampin 8/327 (2.4%)1/23 (4.3%)9/350 (2.6%)0.074
  Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 2/327 (0.6%)0/23 (0%)2/350 (0.6%)>0.999
  Tetracycline 9/327 (2.8%)1/23 (4.3%)10/350 (2.9%)0.564
Vancomycin MIC by BMD method 0.527
  0.55/327 (1.5%)0/23 (0%)5/350 (1.4%)
  1281/327 (86%)22/23 (96%)303/350 (87%)
  241/327 (13%)1/23 (4.3%)42/350 (12%)
Vancomycin MIC by E test method <0.001
  0.50 (0%)2 (9.5%)2 (0.6%)
  0.758 (2.5%)2 (9.5%)10 (2.9%)
  162 (19%)12 (57%)74 (22%)
  1.5180 (56%)3 (14%)183 (54%)
  266 (21%)2 (9.5%)68 (20%)
  34 (1.3%)0 (0%)4 (1.2%)
agr dysfunction38/327 (12%)4/23 (17%)42/350 (12%)0.501
spa types a <0.001
  t0081 (0.3%)15 (65%)16 (4.6%)
  t14840 (12%)0 (0%)40 (11%)
  t324157 (48%)0 (0%)157 (45%)
  t66449 (15%)0 (0%)49 (14%)
  Unknown26 (8.0%)1 (4.3%)27 (7.7%)
  others54 (17%)7 (30%)61 (17%)
Data are presented as the number of patients (%). a Only the five most frequent spa types are presented; all remaining spa types were grouped as “others”. ST, sequence type; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; BMD, broth microdilution method.
Table 3. Management and clinical outcomes of patients with MRSA bacteremia.
Table 3. Management and clinical outcomes of patients with MRSA bacteremia.
Outcome ST72 (n = 327)ST8 (n = 23)Total (n = 350)p
Management
Transthoracic echocardiography275/327 (84%)20/23 (87%)295/350 (84%)>0.999
Transesophageal echocardiography63/327 (19%)5/23 (22%)68/350 (19%)0.786
Vancomycin therapy 277/327 (85%)22/23 (96%)299/350 (85%)0.222
 TDM performed 250/327 (76%)19/23 (83%)269/350 (77%)0.615
 Trough level, median (IQR), mg/L11.5 [8.1, 18.7]11.7 [8.9, 18.2]11.5 [8.2, 18.4]0.8
Antibiotics other than vancomycin
 Teicoplanin62/327 (19%)1/23 (4.3%)63/350 (18%)0.093
 Linezolid44/327 (13%)1/23 (4.3%)45/350 (13%)0.334
Time to appropriate antimicrobials, days1.00 [0.00, 2.00]0.00 [0.00, 2.00]1.00 [0.00, 2.00]0.528
Duration of intravenous antimicrobials, days20 [12, 32]17 [13, 40]19 [12, 33]0.824
Removable focus169 (52%)8 (35%)177 (51%)0.13
 Focus removed 148 (88%)8 (100%)156 (88%)0.6
Length of bacteremia
 Bacteremia ≥ 3 days130/327 (40%)9/23 (39%)139/350 (40%)>0.999
 Bacteremia ≥ 7 days62/327 (19%)6/23 (26%)68/350 (19%)0.667
30-day mortality43/327 (13%)0/23 (0%)43/350 (12%)0.093
90-day mortality 75/327 (23%)4/23 (17%)79/350 (23%)0.796
90-day recurrence18/327 (5.5%)1/23 (4.3%)19/350 (5.4%)>0.999
Data are presented as the number of patients (%), unless otherwise indicated. ST, sequence type; TDM; therapeutic drug monitoring; IQR, interquartile range.
Table 4. Univariable and multivariable analysis of risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in 350 adult patients with MRSA bacteremia.
Table 4. Univariable and multivariable analysis of risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in 350 adult patients with MRSA bacteremia.
Risk FactorUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis a
OR [95% CI]pOR [95% CI]p
Age ≥ 65 years 1.30 [0.69, 2.49]0.4191.64 [0.81, 3.40]0.2
Male 0.88 [0.46, 1.70]0.6970.68 [0.33, 1.42]0.3
Hypertension0.68 [0.35, 1.30]0.250
Diabetes mellitus0.60 [0.29, 1.19]0.160
Liver cirrhosis3.26 [1.52, 6.73]0.0022.82 [1.20, 6.44]0.015
End-stage renal disease0.23 [0.04, 0.79]0.0490.29 [0.04, 1.17]0.13
Chronic lung disease b1.19 [0.06, 7.23]0.871
Solid cancer3.03 [1.58, 5.93]<0.0010.93 [0.37, 2.25]0.9
Hematologic malignancy1.02 [0.29, 2.78]0.969
Solid organ transplantation0.54 [0.03, 2.81]0.556
Ischemic heart disease0.62 [0.15, 1.84]0.450
CCI > 44.70 [2.44, 9.21]<0.0014.67 [2.00, 11.5]<0.001
Central catheter related Reference
Peripheral catheter related1.05 [0.21, 4.04]0.946
Pneumonia 2.25 [0.78, 6.61]0.132
Bone and joint infection 0.19 [0.01, 1.09]0.124
Skin and soft tissue0.78 [0.16, 2.93]0.726
Unknown (primary bacteremia) 1.34 [0.48, 3.83]0.577
Others1.24 [0.38, 3.86]0.717
Metastatic infection 0.54 [0.18, 1.32]0.217
Removable focus
  No removable focus ReferenceReference
  Focus removed 0.43 [0.20, 0.86]0.0210.52 [0.23, 1.11]0.10
  Focus not removed 0.86 [0.19, 2.77]0.8231.29 [0.26, 4.68]0.7
MRSA genotype
  ST72ReferenceReference
  ST8 cNot estimable0.985Not estimable>0.9
agr dysfunction 0.96 [0.32, 2.40]0.936
Vancomycin MIC by BMD
  0.5Reference
  10.36 [0.05, 7.34]0.378
  22.00 [0.06, 73.7]0.676
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; ST, sequence type; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; BMD, broth microdilution. a Multivariable analysis included age, sex, MRSA genotype and variables showing significant differences (p < 0.05) in the univariable analysis. b Includes chronic pulmonary obstructive lung disease and bronchiectasis. c Due to complete separation (0 deaths in the ST8 group), odds ratios for 30-day mortality could not be estimated; Fisher’s exact test showed no significant difference (p = 0.093).
Table 5. OR for recurrence and mortality at 90 days in patients with ST8 MRSA compared to those with ST72 MRSA.
Table 5. OR for recurrence and mortality at 90 days in patients with ST8 MRSA compared to those with ST72 MRSA.
AnalysesRecurrenceMortality
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
Univariate0.78 [0.04–4.06]0.8130.71 [0.2–1.95]0.540
Multivariate1.06 [0.05–7.22]0.9620.77 [0.19–2.43]0.672
Multivariate analyses were adjusted for age ≥ 65 years, gender, comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, main focus of infection, metastatic infection, and removal of infection focus. OR, odds ratios; ST, sequence type; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; CI, confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, Y.W.; Kim, J.-H.; Lim, S.Y.; Chang, E.; Bae, S.; Jung, J.; Kim, M.J.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.-H.; Choi, S.-H.; et al. ST8 and ST72 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Bacteremia in Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102399

AMA Style

Lee YW, Kim J-H, Lim SY, Chang E, Bae S, Jung J, Kim MJ, Chong YP, Kim S-H, Choi S-H, et al. ST8 and ST72 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Bacteremia in Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(10):2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Yun Woo, Ji-Hun Kim, So Yun Lim, Euijin Chang, Seongman Bae, Jiwon Jung, Min Jae Kim, Yong Pil Chong, Sung-Han Kim, Sang-Ho Choi, and et al. 2025. "ST8 and ST72 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Bacteremia in Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics" Microorganisms 13, no. 10: 2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102399

APA Style

Lee, Y. W., Kim, J.-H., Lim, S. Y., Chang, E., Bae, S., Jung, J., Kim, M. J., Chong, Y. P., Kim, S.-H., Choi, S.-H., Lee, S.-O., & Kim, Y. S. (2025). ST8 and ST72 Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Bacteremia in Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics. Microorganisms, 13(10), 2399. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop