Next Article in Journal
The Role of Staphylococcal Biofilm on the Surface of Implants in Orthopedic Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Osteopenia and Sarcopenia as Potential Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improved Cladocopium goreaui Genome Assembly Reveals Features of a Facultative Coral Symbiont and the Complex Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellate Genes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/microorganisms10101906
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Microorganisms 2021, 9(3), 510.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: McLennan et al. Assessing the Use of Molecular Barcoding and qPCR for Investigating the Ecology of Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae), a Harmful Algal Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 510

by
Kate McLennan
,
Rendy Ruvindy
,
Martin Ostrowski
and
Shauna Murray
*
Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(10), 1906; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101906
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 26 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dinoflagellate Biology: Using Molecular Approaches to Unlock Their Ecology and Evolution)
Versions Notes
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1].
A correction has been made to Table 1:
Table
Table 1. Names and sequences of all the primers used in this project. Primers 200F and 525R are taken from [51]. The other primers were designed using the online Primer-BLAST software (NCBI). All reverse primers are in reverse complement.
Table 1. Names and sequences of all the primers used in this project. Primers 200F and 525R are taken from [51]. The other primers were designed using the online Primer-BLAST software (NCBI). All reverse primers are in reverse complement.
Name Sequence (Forward) NameSequence (Reverse)
Primer Sequences for qPCR
Pm 200FTGTGTTTATTAGTTACAGAACCAGCPm 525RAATTCTACTCATTCCAATTACAAGACAAT
1F PminCGCAGCGAAGTGTGATAAGC1R PminTCTGGAAAGGCCAGAAGCTG
2F PminTCGGCTCGAACAACGATGAA2R PminAAGCGTTCTGGAAAGGCCAG
3F PminTTCTGGCCTTTCCAGAACGC3R PminCATGCCCAACAACAAGGCAA
4F PminCGTATACTGCGCTTTCGGGA4R PminCACACAGAAACACACAAGCGT
5F PminCCTTTCCAGAACGCTTGTGTG5R PminCTGGGCACTAGACAGCAAGG
6F PminCAGGCTCAGACCGTCTTCTG6R PminAGCGTTCTGGAAAGGCCAG
7F PminCAACAGTTGGTGAGGCTCT7R PminATTCAAAAACACAGAAGATCAGGAA
8F PminAACAACAGTTGGTGAGGCTCTG8R PminCAAAAACACAGAAGATCAGGAAGAC
9F PminGTGAGGCTCTGGGTGGG9R PminCAAAAACACAGAAGATCAGGAAGAC
10F PminTCATTCGCACGCATCCATTC10R PminAAGGACAGGCACAGAAGACG
11F PminTTCAGTGCACAGGGTCTTCC11R PminGTCTTGGTAGGAGTGCGCTG
12F PminGCCTTTCCAGAACGCTTGTGT12R PminGCTGACCTAACTTCATGTCTTGG
13F PminCGCTTGTGTGTTTCTGTGTG13R PminCCATGCCCAACAACAAGGC
14F PminTCTTCCCACGCAAGCAACT14R PminCGGGTTTGCTGACCTAAACT
15F PminACATTCGCACGCATCCATTC15R PminTTGCTGCCCTTGAGTCTCTG
16F PminAACAGTTGGTGAGGCTCTGG16R PminAAGGACAGGCACAGAAGACG
17F PminACAACAGTTGGTGAGGCTCT17R PminTTGCTGCCCTTGAGTCTCTG
18F PminCAGTTGGTGAGGCTCTGGG18R PminCAGAAGACGGTCTGAGCCTG
19F PminTTCAGTGCACAGGGTCTTCC19R PminCATGCCCAACAACAAGGCAA
20F PminATTCCAGCTTCTGGCCTGTC20R PminTAGTTGCTTGCGTGGGAAGA
21F PminCTGTCCAGAACGCTTGTGTG21R PminCTTCTAGTTGCTTGCGTGGG
22F PminTTCCCACGCAAGCAACTAGA22R PminGCACTAGACAGCAAGGCCA
Primer Sequences for Amplicon Sequencing
Modified TAReuk454FWD1CCAGCASCYGCGGTAATTCCModified TAReukREV3 ACTTTCGTTCTTGATYRATGA
Primer Sequences for PCR and Sanger Sequencing
d1fACCCGCTGAATTTAAGCATAd3bTCGGAGGGAACCAGCTACTA
ITSfwdTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGGITSrevATATGCTTAAATTCAGCGGGT
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. McLennan, K.; Ruvindy, R.; Ostrowski, M.; Murray, S. Assessing the Use of Molecular Barcoding and qPCR for Investigating the Ecology of Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae), a Harmful Algal Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McLennan, K.; Ruvindy, R.; Ostrowski, M.; Murray, S. Correction: McLennan et al. Assessing the Use of Molecular Barcoding and qPCR for Investigating the Ecology of Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae), a Harmful Algal Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 510. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101906

AMA Style

McLennan K, Ruvindy R, Ostrowski M, Murray S. Correction: McLennan et al. Assessing the Use of Molecular Barcoding and qPCR for Investigating the Ecology of Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae), a Harmful Algal Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 510. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(10):1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101906

Chicago/Turabian Style

McLennan, Kate, Rendy Ruvindy, Martin Ostrowski, and Shauna Murray. 2022. "Correction: McLennan et al. Assessing the Use of Molecular Barcoding and qPCR for Investigating the Ecology of Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae), a Harmful Algal Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 510" Microorganisms 10, no. 10: 1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10101906

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop