Next Article in Journal
Virulence and Resistance Mechanisms in Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Previous Article in Journal
Prevention and Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Using Promising Agr-QS-Targeting Anti-Biofilm Agents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathogenicity and Aggressiveness of Corticioid Basidiomycetes Associated with Stem and Branch Rot of Avocado
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species Distribution of Candida Isolates in Amniotic Fluid, Vaginal Discharge, and Lochial Cultures in Obstetric and Gynecological Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

by
Silvia Gabriela Ionescu
1,
Elena Teona Cosovanu
1,*,
Cristina Daniela Dimitriu
1,2,
Costin Damian
1,
Diana Costin
1,3,
Ancuta Goriuc
1,
Elena Porumb Andrese
1,
Demetra Gabriela Socolov
1,2,
Mihaela Grigore
1,2,
Luminita Smaranda Iancu
1,3,
Irina Draga Caruntu
1 and
Ramona Gabriela Ursu
1,2
1
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700115 Iași, Romania
2
“Cuza-Vodă” Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 700038 Iași, Romania
3
National Institute of Public Health, Iasi Regional Center for Public Health, 700465 Iași, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2026, 15(8), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15080797
Submission received: 3 July 2026 / Revised: 22 July 2026 / Accepted: 24 July 2026 / Published: 28 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fungal Pathogenesis and Antifungal Resistance)

Abstract

(1) Background: Candida-positive cultures in pregnancy and the postpartum period are frequently identified in obstetric and gynecological practice. This study evaluated species distribution and associated maternal and obstetric variables in amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures. (2) Methods: A retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at the “Cuza Vodă” Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iași, including Candida-positive samples collected in 2024 (242 amniotic fluid, 2020 vaginal discharge, and 827 lochial isolates). Fungal identification was performed using Sabouraud and chromogenic media, with species-level identification in most cases and classification as Candida spp. when differentiation was not possible. (3) Results: Candida albicans predominated across all compartments (69.8%, 55.35%, and 66.9%, respectively), followed by non-albicans species, mainly Pichia kudriavzevii. Vaginal discharge cultures, obtained from both pregnant and non-pregnant women and analyzed after stratification by pregnancy status, showed multiple significant associations with maternal and obstetric variables; apparent associations with fetal variables were largely attributable to the inclusion of non-pregnant women and were not retained within the pregnant stratum. Amniotic fluid and lochial cultures demonstrated limited associations. Older maternal age was the only consistent independent correlate of non-albicans Candida isolation, whereas the remaining associated variables were compartment-specific. Multivariable models identified compartment-specific correlates of non-albicans Candida isolation but showed limited discriminatory performance, with low sensitivity in most strata. (4) Conclusions: Candida species distribution is compartment-dependent, with greater clinical heterogeneity in vaginal discharge and more limited patterns in amniotic fluid and lochia. These culture-positive findings support species-level identification for microbiological surveillance and provide perinatal microbiological context for future integrated maternal–neonatal studies; because antifungal susceptibility and neonatal outcomes were not assessed, no therapeutic or neonatal inferences can be drawn.

1. Introduction

Fungal pathogens and antifungal resistance are increasingly framed as public-health priorities, and the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list explicitly includes multiple medically important yeast taxa, with Candida albicans categorized as critical priority and other clinically relevant yeasts (e.g., Nakaseomyces glabratus, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Pichia kudriavzevii) prioritized because of their burden and resistance implications. In parallel clinical practice, candidiasis is understood as disease resulting from overgrowth of endogenous yeasts that normally colonize human sites (including the vagina), with phenotypes spanning localized mucosal infection to invasive disease in vulnerable hosts; pregnancy and hormone-associated physiologic changes are recognized risk enhancers for vaginal candidiasis [1,2].
In obstetrics, Candida is clinically relevant not only as a cause of symptomatic vaginitis, but also because rare intrauterine involvement can be associated with severe perinatal outcomes. A focused synthesis of Candida chorioamnionitis cases reports prematurity and substantial fetal–neonatal morbidity and mortality, highlighting that intra-amniotic infection, although uncommon, can carry high clinical stakes. At the population level, evidence syntheses of vulvovaginal yeast infection during pregnancy emphasize biologic plausibility via inflammation, but the aggregated epidemiologic signal for adverse outcomes remains uncertain because of heterogeneity, frequent high risk of bias, and limited confounding control in the primary literature [3,4,5]. The pregnancy vaginal environment is also clinically important because species distribution and antifungal susceptibility are not static. More broadly, recent Candida literature highlights the importance of accurate molecular detection, recognition of antifungal resistance mechanisms, and implementation of antifungal stewardship programs [6]. In addition, pregnancy-microbiome literature links alterations in vaginal microbial ecology (including loss of protective Lactobacillus dominance and increased community diversity) with multiple obstetric complications, reinforcing that compartmental microbiologic states can be clinically informative [7].
Clinical guidance for vulvovaginal candidosis emphasizes disciplined diagnosis (because symptoms are not sufficiently specific), with escalation to culture and species identification in recurrent or complicated presentations; pregnancy is consistently treated as a special population in which topical azole therapy for 7 days is generally preferred. These principles align with sexually transmitted infection guidance frameworks and expert reviews that position yeast culture as a diagnostic reference standard while also describing the expanding—but still scenario-dependent—role of newer molecular assays. Collectively, guideline-based perspectives support laboratory-confirmed, species-informed perinatal Candida characterization in settings where maternal–fetal risk assessment matters [8,9,10].
Accurate interpretation of species distribution also requires taxonomic clarity, because several clinically relevant yeasts historically reported within the genus Candida have been reclassified (including Candida krusei as Pichia kudriavzevii and Candida glabrata as Nakaseomyces glabratus), and inconsistent adoption of updated names can create clinician-facing ambiguity if not handled transparently. Pregnancy-focused reviews further discuss associations between vulvovaginal candidiasis and adverse obstetric events (including PROM, chorioamnionitis, preterm birth, and puerperal infections) and explicitly note that the most frequent pathway to intrauterine infection is ascending genital tract infection, while also emphasizing that evidence remains insufficient to conclude that systemic therapy prevents major outcomes in all contexts. In parallel, management is increasingly complicated by fluconazole-resistant vulvovaginal candidosis, reinforcing the need for targeted regimens and alternative options, alongside randomized trial evidence evaluating topical treatments in pregnancy [11,12,13,14]. Finally, the biological plausibility of “shifting niches” across intrauterine, intrapartum, and postpartum compartments is strengthened by microbiome studies showing that delivery is accompanied by abrupt remodeling of urogenital microbial communities, with substantial postpartum transitions away from Lactobacillus-dominant states, and by paired maternal–infant analyses suggesting coordinated maternal vaginal and neonatal microbial shifts in the context of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Contemporary antenatal studies further show that colonization/infection patterns—and susceptibility profiles—vary across settings, while systematic review evidence on Pichia kudriavzevii highlights intrinsic fluconazole resistance and the need for timely identification and susceptibility-informed care. In addition, recent amniotic fluid susceptibility data demonstrate that even in intra-amniotic Candida, species diversity and resistance can be detected, supporting species-level evaluation in obstetric microbiology [15,16,17,18,19,20].
From a neonatal perspective, microbiological assessment does not begin exclusively after birth. Fetal and neonatal microbial exposure may be shaped by antenatal, intrapartum, and early postpartum compartments, including amniotic fluid, the maternal genital tract, and postpartum genital secretions. Although maternal Candida isolation does not necessarily imply neonatal infection, species-level characterization of Candida-positive perinatal cultures may provide clinically relevant information regarding potential microbial exposure at the maternal–fetal and maternal–neonatal interfaces. Within this framework, evaluating Candida species distribution in amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures may contribute to a broader understanding of perinatal fungal ecology and may support future studies integrating maternal and neonatal microbiological data.
Aim: This retrospective study evaluated the species distribution of Candida isolates in amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures collected over a one-year period, and explored associations between species grouping (Candida albicans versus non-albicans Candida) and maternal and obstetric characteristics. Within each sample type, we further examined which characteristics were independently associated with non-albicans Candida isolation. By characterizing Candida-positive compartments that may contribute to fetal or neonatal microbial exposure, the study also aimed to provide a perinatal microbiological framework that may inform future integrated maternal–neonatal investigations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

A retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at the “Cuza Vodă” Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iași, Romania. All samples were collected over a one-year period (January–December 2024) as part of routine microbiological investigations. The unit of analysis was the individual Candida-positive culture (isolate); amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial specimens were treated as three independent sample types and analyzed separately, rather than as paired or longitudinally collected samples obtained from the same women across the perinatal period. Because the isolates were retrieved from routine laboratory records, it could not be reliably determined whether an individual patient had contributed more than one positive culture, either within or across sample types; consequently, repeated samples from the same patient may be present in the dataset, and the results should be interpreted at the level of the isolate rather than the individual woman.

2.2. Sample Collection and Microbiological Analysis

A total of 242 amniotic fluid, 2020 vaginal discharge, and 827 lochial Candida-positive cultures were included (Figure 1). Cultures were requested during routine clinician-directed care. Because the retrospective records did not consistently document the clinical indication for culture or relevant exposures, including recent antibiotic or antifungal therapy, hospitalization, cervical cerclage, and immunosuppression, these factors could not be reliably reconstructed or included in the analyses. Specimens were inoculated onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) for primary fungal isolation and onto CHROMagar™ Candida (CHROMagar, Paris, France), on which presumptive species differentiation was based on colony colour and morphology (for example, green colonies for Candida albicans and pink, rough colonies for Pichia kudriavzevii). Definitive species-level identification was performed using the VITEK® 2 Compact 60 automated system with VITEK® 2 YST identification cards (REF 21343), operated with VITEK® 2 software version 9.04.4 (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All Candida-positive isolates were processed through the same identification pathway, comprising primary isolation, presumptive differentiation on chromogenic medium, and confirmatory VITEK® testing; a species-level designation was recorded only when the VITEK® system returned a definitive species-level identification. Chromogenic morphology served only as a presumptive step, and the VITEK® result was treated as definitive. When the two were discordant, the species assignment followed the VITEK® identification. Isolates for which VITEK® 2 did not provide a definitive species-level identification were reported as Candida spp., accounting for 8.7% of amniotic fluid isolates, 14.0% of vaginal discharge isolates, and 9.7% of lochial isolates. The retrospective database retained the final laboratory identification but not individual VITEK® confidence scores, low-discrimination outputs, or systematic records of CHROMagar™–VITEK® discordance; therefore, these parameters could not be quantified. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and sequencing were not used during the study period. Named rare species, including Candida parapsilosis, were reported separately, and reference Candida strains were processed in parallel for quality control. Because these specimens were retrieved from routine laboratory records that captured only Candida-positive results, the total number of amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures performed during the study period could not be ascertained. Accordingly, this analysis characterizes the species distribution among Candida-positive cultures only and does not permit estimation of culture positivity, prevalence, or incidence. For the exploratory analyses, the binary outcome contrasted cultures reported exclusively as Candida albicans with all other Candida-positive cultures. Therefore, cultures containing both C. albicans and a confirmed non-albicans Candida species (mixed cultures; n = 6: 1 amniotic fluid, 2 lochial, and 3 vaginal discharge cultures) were assigned to the non-albicans analytical category because they could not be considered exclusively C. albicans. For species-level tabulation, each mixed culture was counted under its identified non-albicans component. These cultures were counted in the non-albicans group because the presence of any non-albicans component, several of which show reduced azole susceptibility, is the finding of greatest therapeutic relevance. The effect of this decision was tested directly in a sensitivity analysis.

2.3. Study Variables

Demographic, clinical, obstetric, and fetal data were collected from medical records, including maternal age, place of residence, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, obstetric history (gravidity, parity, previous caesarean section, infertility), pregnancy characteristics (gestational age, membrane status, onset of labor, complications), maternal comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders, thyroid disorders, inherited thrombophilia or thrombocytopenia, renal disease, hepatitis B or C, HIV infection, ocular disorders, uterine leiomyoma, history of neoplasia, intervertebral disc herniation, hepatic abscess, cholelithiasis, sinus tachycardia, bronchial asthma, and gestational edema), and fetal outcomes. Isolates were classified as Candida albicans or non-albicans Candida. Body mass index (BMI) was based on the weight and height recorded at the time of sampling and categorized according to WHO criteria. For pregnant and postpartum women, overweight and obesity reflected pre-existing weight-status categories documented in the medical records and were not based on gestational or early postpartum weight gain; for non-pregnant women, BMI was calculated from the weight and height recorded at the time of sampling. For exploratory comparative and multivariable analyses, cultures were classified as exclusively Candida albicans or as an aggregated non-albicans Candida category comprising named non-albicans species, Candida spp. isolates without definitive species-level identification, and mixed cultures containing both C. albicans and a non-albicans species. Species-level distributions were summarized separately, and species-specific adjusted models were not fitted because several taxa were too infrequent to yield stable estimates; therefore, this binary grouping should not be interpreted as implying biological equivalence among taxa. In the vaginal discharge group, cultures were obtained from both pregnant women (obstetric setting) and non-pregnant women (gynecological setting) across the full age range, including peri- and post-menopausal patients; this group was therefore treated as a mixed gynecological–obstetric population and was stratified a priori by pregnancy status into pregnant and non-pregnant subgroups. Obstetric and fetal variables (gestational age, status of fetal membranes, onset of labor, fetal presentation, fetal conditions, and fetal outcome) were defined only for pregnant women; for non-pregnant women these variables were treated as not applicable and were excluded from the corresponding comparisons rather than encoded as a distinct category.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida groups were performed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. To identify independent predictors of non-albicans Candida isolation, multivariable logistic regression models were constructed using an a priori variable-entry strategy rather than univariate selection alone. Clinically continuous variables (maternal age, gestational age, and parity) were entered as continuous predictors a priori, irrespective of their categorical univariate result, because the categorical groupings used for descriptive tabulation were not intended to govern the functional form of these variables in the regression models; univariate screening (retention of variables with p < 0.05) was therefore applied only to categorical candidate predictors. Multicollinearity among the continuous predictors, in particular maternal age and parity, which are plausibly correlated, was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF) and tolerance; across the four multivariable models the maximum VIF was 1.30 and the minimum tolerance 0.77, consistent with the absence of problematic collinearity. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Model performance was evaluated using classification accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Nagelkerke R2, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. As a sensitivity analysis, the association between maternal age, the principal correlate identified across the primary models, and non-albicans isolation was re-examined in a univariable logistic model after excluding the six polymicrobial co-isolations and all genus-level isolates lacking a species-level identification. For the vaginal discharge cultures, all associations were assessed separately within the pregnant and non-pregnant strata, and obstetric and fetal variables were analyzed exclusively within the pregnant stratum. Categories corresponding to women who were not currently pregnant were treated as not applicable and were excluded from obstetric and fetal comparisons, whereas observations recorded as not recorded were handled as missing data. Separate multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for the pregnant and non-pregnant strata, with obstetric and fetal predictors entered only in the pregnant-stratum model. In all models the outcome was coded as non-albicans Candida (=1) versus Candida albicans (=0). To limit overfitting and avoid unstable estimates from sparsely populated categories, maternal age, gestational age, and parity were entered as continuous variables, and only biologically plausible, sufficiently populated predictors were retained; binary predictors were referenced to their absent or normal category (rural residence and absence of the comorbidity). Maternal BMI, for which approximately 98% of cultures originated from normal-weight women, and other extremely rare categories were not entered into the multivariable models.
Throughout the analysis, true clinical categories, not-applicable observations, and missing values were treated as distinct. Missing data were not imputed, and each variable was analysed on a complete-case basis. For antepartum pregnancy complications and fetal conditions, the absence of a documented finding was recorded as a true negative (“None”) rather than as missing data.
The chi-square test was applied when all expected cell counts were ≥5. Fisher’s exact test was used for 2 × 2 contingency tables with expected cell counts < 5, whereas a Monte Carlo approximation of the Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test was used for larger contingency tables with expected cell counts < 5. Reported p-values are two-sided and unadjusted. Categorical variables with sparse or clinically redundant categories were collapsed into clinically meaningful groups before testing; for example, antepartum complications and fetal conditions were reduced to their principal categories, with the remaining rare events combined. All association analyses were exploratory and hypothesis-generating. To account for the large number of comparisons performed across the three sample types, the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was applied to control the false discovery rate at 5% within each sample type, and associations are interpreted primarily in the light of these false-discovery-rate-adjusted results. Owing to the number of tests performed and the limited size of the amniotic fluid and lochial cohorts, associations with marginal p-values (approximately 0.01–0.05) that did not survive false-discovery-rate correction were interpreted conservatively, as preliminary signals to be confirmed in future studies rather than as established effects.

3. Results

3.1. Determinants of Candida Species Distribution in Amniotic Fluid

A total of 242 amnioculture isolates were analyzed. Candida albicans was the predominant species, accounting for 69.8% of isolates. Among non-albicans Candida, the most frequently identified species was Pichia kudriavzevii (19.0%), followed by Candida spp. (8.7%) and Nakaseomyces glabratus (2.5%). In this cohort, species distribution was not associated with most maternal, obstetric, or fetal characteristics, including maternal age, residence, reproductive history, delivery-related variables, and the majority of comorbidities (all p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, gestational age (p = 0.001), maternal BMI (p = 0.029), month of sampling (p = 0.040), and inherited thrombophilia (p = 0.048) were associated with species distribution; however, the maternal–BMI and thrombophilia associations rested on very few exposed cultures (5 with obesity and 12 with inherited thrombophilia) and, together with month of sampling, did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Fetal presentation, fetal conditions, and fetal outcome were not associated with species distribution (Table 1). To identify independent predictors, a multivariable logistic regression model was fitted with maternal age, gestational age, and parity entered as continuous variables; maternal BMI and inherited thrombophilia were not modelled because of extremely sparse categories (only 5 isolates originated from women with obesity and 12 from women with inherited thrombophilia), which precludes stable estimation. Older maternal age (OR = 1.07 per year, 95% CI 1.02–1.12, p = 0.003) and lower parity (OR = 0.68 per additional birth, 95% CI 0.52–0.90, p = 0.007) were independently associated with non-albicans Candida, whereas gestational age was not (OR = 0.96 per week, 95% CI 0.91–1.01, p = 0.121). The model was statistically significant overall (omnibus p < 0.001) but had limited explanatory power (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.10); despite an overall classification accuracy of 71.9%, sensitivity for non-albicans Candida was low (12.3%, with 97.6% specificity for Candida albicans; AUC = 0.65). Consistent with the pre-specified analysis plan, maternal age, gestational age, and parity were entered as continuous predictors a priori; although the categorical maternal–age (p = 0.133) and parity (p = 0.096) groupings were not significant in the univariate tabulation, the corresponding continuous predictors were independently associated with non-albicans Candida in the multivariable model, consistent with graded rather than threshold effects. Collinearity between the continuous predictors was minimal (maternal age VIF = 1.24, parity VIF = 1.30, gestational age VIF = 1.05; all tolerance ≥ 0.77).

3.2. Determinants of Candida Species Distribution in Lochial Cultures

A total of 827 lochial culture isolates were included in the analysis. Candida albicans was the predominant species, accounting for 66.9% of isolates. Among non-albicans Candida, the most frequently identified species was Pichia kudriavzevii (21.3%), followed by Candida spp. (9.7%) and Nakaseomyces glabratus (2.1%). Overall, Candida species distribution in lochial cultures showed limited associations with maternal, obstetric, and fetal variables. In univariate analysis, significant associations were observed for maternal age group (p = 0.009), place of residence (p = 0.035), maternal BMI (p = 0.044), and parity group (p < 0.001); after Benjamini–Hochberg correction within the lochial cohort, only parity group remained significant, whereas the associations with maternal age group, place of residence, and maternal BMI did not survive correction and are therefore interpreted as exploratory, unadjusted findings. Specifically, non-albicans Candida was more frequently identified in older women and among nulliparous and low-parity women, while Candida albicans predominated in younger and multiparous patients. Rural residence was more commonly associated with Candida albicans, whereas non-albicans Candida showed a relatively higher proportion in urban patients. None of the remaining maternal, obstetric, fetal, or comorbidity variables was significantly associated with species distribution (all p > 0.05); these included month of sampling, gravidity, previous caesarean section, gestational age, membrane status, onset of labour, antepartum complications, the recorded maternal comorbidities, and fetal presentation, conditions, and outcome (Table 2). In lochial cultures, a multivariable logistic regression model including maternal age and parity was statistically significant (omnibus p < 0.001) but had limited explanatory power (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.045) and limited discriminatory performance (classification accuracy 65.8%), with low sensitivity for non-albicans Candida (3.3%) and high specificity for Candida albicans (96.7%), with an AUC of 0.63. Older maternal age was independently associated with higher odds of non-albicans Candida (OR = 1.05 per year, 95% CI 1.03–1.08, p < 0.001), and lower parity was likewise independently associated with non-albicans Candida (OR = 0.76 per additional birth, 95% CI 0.65–0.88, p < 0.001), reflecting a higher proportion of non-albicans isolates in nulliparous and low-parity women. Place of residence was not retained as an independent predictor. Overall, increasing maternal age and decreasing parity were modest but independent correlates of non-albicans Candida in lochial cultures, although the overall predictive performance of the model remained limited.

3.3. Determinants of Candida Species Distribution in Vaginal Discharge

A total of 2020 vaginal discharge isolates were included in the analysis. Candida albicans was the predominant species, accounting for 55.35% of isolates. Among non-albicans Candida, the most frequently identified species was Pichia kudriavzevii (26.58%), followed by Candida spp. (13.96%) and Nakaseomyces glabratus (4.06%), while Candida parapsilosis was rarely detected (0.05%). The species composition across the three sample types is summarized in Figure 2. The distribution of Candida species varied significantly according to maternal and obstetric characteristics; because this cohort comprised both pregnant and non-pregnant women, obstetric and fetal variables were assessed only within the pregnant stratum. Maternal age was strongly associated with species distribution (p < 0.001), with C. albicans predominating in women of reproductive age, particularly between 23–32 years, whereas non-albicans species were relatively more frequent in older age groups. In contrast, place of residence and maternal BMI were not significantly associated (p = 0.172 and p = 0.456), and chronic smoking showed only a borderline, non-significant association (p = 0.050). Obstetric history demonstrated significant associations with species distribution. Non-albicans Candida was more frequent among nulligravida and nulliparous women, while C. albicans predominated in multiparous groups (both p < 0.001). Previous caesarean section was also associated with species distribution (p = 0.014), whereas in vitro fertilization showed no significant effect (p = 0.799). Infertility was significantly associated with a higher proportion of non-albicans species (p = 0.002). Among current-pregnancy characteristics, assessed within the pregnant stratum, gestational age (p = 0.003) and onset of labour (p = 0.005) were associated with species distribution, whereas status of the fetal membranes (p = 0.858) and antepartum pregnancy complications (p = 0.129) were not associated with species distribution. Among maternal comorbidities, significant associations were observed for diabetes (p = 0.014), hypothyroidism (p = 0.011), and uterine leiomyoma (p < 0.001), the latter showing a clear predominance of non-albicans species. Other comorbidities, including hypertension, thrombophilia, renal disease, and viral infections, were not significantly associated. In addition, month of sampling (p < 0.001) and obstetric hemorrhage (p = 0.011) reached statistical significance in univariate analysis; the temporal association most plausibly reflects seasonal and case-mix variation across the study year rather than a biological effect, and the obstetric-hemorrhage association rests on few events, so both are regarded as exploratory. When obstetric and fetal variables were restricted to pregnant women (excluding the not-currently-pregnant cultures), the apparent fetal associations were largely attenuated: within the pregnant stratum, fetal outcome (p = 0.297), fetal conditions (p = 0.729), and status of fetal membranes (p = 0.858) were no longer statistically significant, fetal presentation showed only a borderline, non-significant association (p = 0.059), and gestational age remained significant but with a negligible effect size. This indicates that the strong fetal and obstetric associations observed in the pooled vaginal discharge analysis were largely driven by the inclusion of non-pregnant women rather than by a genuine relationship with fetal status. Because the vaginal discharge cohort comprised both pregnant and non-pregnant women, separate multivariable models were fitted for each stratum. In the pregnant stratum (n = 1627), older maternal age (OR = 1.05 per year, 95% CI 1.03–1.06, p < 0.001) and the presence of a thyroid disorder (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.14–7.35, p = 0.025) were independently associated with non-albicans Candida, whereas gestational age (OR = 0.99 per week, p = 0.062) and parity (OR = 0.93 per birth, p = 0.082) showed only non-significant trends toward higher non-albicans proportions at earlier gestation and lower parity; the model was significant overall (omnibus p < 0.001) but explained little variance (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.04), with an accuracy of 61.3%, a sensitivity of 11.6% for non-albicans Candida, and a specificity of 92.7% for Candida albicans (AUC = 0.60). In the non-pregnant stratum (n = 393), older maternal age remained the only independent predictor (OR = 1.04 per year, 95% CI 1.02–1.06, p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.10, AUC = 0.68), and non-albicans Candida accounted for the majority of isolates in this older subgroup. In this stratum, in which non-albicans Candida formed the majority class, the model showed high sensitivity (96.7%) but low specificity (14.2%), the inverse of the sensitivity–specificity pattern observed in the other three models. This sensitivity–specificity inversion should be interpreted as a threshold-dependent consequence of outcome prevalence and class imbalance at the 0.5 probability threshold, rather than as evidence of strong discriminatory performance. Across both strata, increasing maternal age was therefore consistently associated with a higher likelihood of non-albicans Candida (Table 3). Excluding the six polymicrobial co-isolations and the genus-level isolates lacking species-level identification did not materially alter the species distribution. In this restricted analysis, older maternal age remained significantly associated with non-albicans isolation in lochial (OR 1.04 per year, 95% CI 1.01–1.07) and vaginal discharge cultures (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05–1.07), with a concordant direction in amniotic fluid (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98–1.07). These findings indicate that the principal association was robust to the classification of co-isolations and genus-level isolates.
The multivariable logistic regression models are summarized in Table 4.
Species-level frequencies of the non-albicans isolates in each compartment are detailed in Table 5.

4. Discussion

In the present study, a total of 242 amnioculture isolates were analyzed, with Candida albicans representing the predominant species (69.8%), followed by non-albicans Candida, mainly Pichia kudriavzevii and Nakaseomyces glabratus. This distribution is consistent with existing literature, which identifies Candida albicans as the principal etiological agent in intra-amniotic infections, while non-albicans species are less frequently isolated [21,22,23]. Previous reports have emphasized that the detection of Candida in amniotic fluid is relatively rare but clinically significant, often associated with preterm labor and adverse perinatal outcomes [21,22]. In our cohort, species distribution showed limited association with most maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics; in multivariable analysis, older maternal age and lower parity, rather than gestational age, were the independent predictors of non-albicans Candida, and gestational age was not retained once these factors were taken into account. Although intra-amniotic infection has been linked to early gestational complications and preterm labor, our data do not support an independent association between gestational age and species distribution [22,24]. In addition, the intrinsic antifungal activity of amniotic fluid, demonstrated in experimental studies, may partially explain the relatively low diversity observed in our population, as this biological barrier can inhibit fungal proliferation, especially for species such as Nakaseomyces glabratus [25]. Case reports of candidal chorioamnionitis further highlight the diagnostic value of amnioculture, which enables accurate species identification even in patients without evident risk factors [23]. In contrast to these reports, our data showed no significant association between Candida species and immediate fetal outcomes, consistent with colonization or low-grade infection occurring without overt clinical consequences. Overall, these findings reinforce the predominance of Candida albicans among amniotic fluid isolates and indicate that host demographic and clinical characteristics explained little of the variation in species distribution; microbiological evaluation of amniotic fluid nonetheless remains valuable for accurate species identification.
In the lochial sample type, 827 culture isolates were analyzed, again demonstrating the predominance of Candida albicans (66.9%), followed by non-albicans Candida, mainly Pichia kudriavzevii and Nakaseomyces glabratus. This pattern is consistent with previous studies indicating that Candida albicans remains the dominant species in vaginal and postpartum colonization, despite an overall reduction in yeast isolation rates during the puerperium [26,27]. The absence of significant associations between Candida species and most maternal, obstetric, and fetal variables suggests that postpartum colonization is influenced predominantly by local physiological factors rather than systemic maternal characteristics. Indeed, lochial discharge has been shown to exert a mechanical “cleansing” effect, contributing to a transient decrease in vaginal Candida colonization during the postpartum period, even in the absence of antifungal treatment [26,27]. Interestingly, although lochial secretions may promote fungal growth under in vitro conditions, the in vivo environment appears to limit colonization, reflecting a complex interaction between biochemical properties and mechanical elimination mechanisms [28].
Within this postpartum context, maternal age and parity emerged as independent predictors of Candida species distribution, with non-albicans Candida more frequently identified in older and lower-parity (primiparous) women, while Candida albicans predominated in younger and multiparous patients. These findings may reflect differences in hormonal milieu, vaginal microbiota stability, and immune adaptation across reproductive stages. However, the overall predictive capacity of the multivariable model remained limited, indicating that these factors exert only a modest influence on species differentiation. The lack of association with gestational variables, delivery-related factors, and maternal comorbidities further supports the hypothesis that postpartum Candida dynamics are largely independent of classical obstetric risk factors. Moreover, the absence of significant correlations with fetal outcomes is consistent with the generally benign and transient nature of postpartum Candida colonization, as supported by studies demonstrating a physiological decline in yeast isolation rates within 6–8 weeks after delivery [27]. Importantly, this transient reduction does not imply eradication, and recurrence after the resolution of lochia remains possible, highlighting the need for continued clinical awareness beyond the immediate puerperium [26].
In contrast to the relatively stable and physiologically influenced patterns observed in amniotic and lochial samples, the analysis of 2020 vaginal discharge isolates revealed a more complex and clinically dynamic distribution. Candida albicans remained the predominant species (55.35%), followed by a substantial proportion of non-albicans Candida, particularly Pichia kudriavzevii, Candida spp., and Nakaseomyces glabratus. This distribution aligns with most published data, which consistently identify C. albicans as the leading etiological agent of vulvovaginal candidiasis and abnormal vaginal discharge, accounting for approximately 50–70% of isolates in both pregnant and non-pregnant women [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. At the same time, the relatively high proportion of non-albicans species observed in our cohort supports the growing evidence of a shift toward these species, particularly in pregnancy-associated infections, recurrent disease, and clinically complex cases [38,39,40,41,42,43]. This shift is clinically relevant, as non-albicans Candida species are associated with increased virulence factors, biofilm formation, and reduced susceptibility to commonly used antifungal agents, particularly azoles, emphasizing the need for species-level identification [32,38,39,40,41,42,43]. In particular, Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei), the most frequent non-albicans species in the present cohort, is recognized in the literature for intrinsic resistance to fluconazole; because antifungal susceptibility testing was not performed in this study, this consideration derives solely from published data and was not confirmed for the present isolates.
The associations identified between Candida species distribution and maternal, reproductive, and gestational characteristics further highlight the multifactorial nature of vaginal Candida colonization and species distribution. In our cohort, C. albicans predominated in women of reproductive age and in later pregnancy, particularly in the third trimester, consistent with studies demonstrating that hormonal and immunological changes during pregnancy favor fungal overgrowth [29,30,32,35,36]. Conversely, non-albicans Candida species were more frequently identified in older women, nulligravida or nulliparous patients, and in earlier gestational stages or non-pregnant states, suggesting a distinct ecological and host-interaction profile [38,39,41,42]. Notably, the vaginal discharge cohort comprised both pregnant and non-pregnant women, the latter frequently of peri- or post-menopausal age, and the apparent associations between Candida species and obstetric or fetal characteristics were largely confounded by this case mix: after stratification, fetal outcome, fetal conditions, status of fetal membranes, and fetal presentation were no longer significantly associated with species distribution within the pregnant stratum. The predominance of non-albicans species among older and non-pregnant women is consistent with a recognized gynecological pattern of estrogen-dependent shifts in the vaginal mycobiota rather than a perinatal phenomenon. Additional associations with infertility and previous caesarean section further support the role of altered vaginal microbiota and reproductive tract conditions in shaping species distribution. Although maternal comorbidities such as diabetes, hypothyroidism, and uterine leiomyoma showed significant associations in univariate analysis, their lack of independent significance in multivariable models suggests that their overall contribution is modest. Similarly, behavioral and hygiene-related factors, including antibiotic use, sexual activity, and personal hygiene practices, have been reported to influence infection risk, reinforcing the complex interplay between host, microbial, and environmental factors [29,34,37,43,44].
From a clinical perspective, these findings must be interpreted within the broader diagnostic framework of vaginal discharge, which represents a common but nonspecific symptom with a wide differential diagnosis, including both infectious and noninfectious etiologies [45,46]. Importantly, vaginal Candida colonization may be asymptomatic, particularly during pregnancy, and does not necessarily indicate clinically significant infection [29,32,42,43]. Nevertheless, when symptomatic, candidiasis is strongly associated with vaginal discharge, pruritus, irritation, and recurrent episodes, significantly affecting quality of life [33,34,35,36,37,43]. In our study, after the analysis was restricted to pregnant women with documented fetal data, Candida species were not significantly associated with fetal presentation, fetal conditions, or fetal outcome (all p > 0.05); the apparent association of non-albicans species with atypical fetal categories in the pooled data reflected the inclusion of non-pregnant women, in whom these variables are undefined, rather than a genuine relationship with fetal status. These fetal analyses are exploratory and do not establish a causal link between Candida species and fetal outcome. More broadly, vaginal Candida colonization often represents a commensal or low-grade state that may become clinically relevant only under specific conditions. Moreover, rare but severe complications, including ascending infection and chorioamnionitis, have been described even in asymptomatic vaginal candidiasis [44].
Overall, integrating findings across amniotic, lochial, and vaginal samples, our study highlights distinct ecological patterns of Candida colonization across the three perinatal sample types examined. While Candida albicans consistently remains the dominant species, non-albicans Candida are increasingly relevant, particularly in recurrent infections and clinically complex cases. These findings underscore the importance of targeted microbiological evaluation, including culture-based identification, to support accurate diagnosis and species-level surveillance of perinatal Candida; because antifungal susceptibility and treatment data were not available, conclusions regarding therapeutic strategies or maternal and neonatal outcomes cannot be drawn [32,35,36,38,39,40,41,43]. After Benjamini–Hochberg correction within each sample type, only gestational age (amniotic fluid) and parity (lochia) retained significance, whereas all vaginal discharge associations that were significant before adjustment also survived correction (12 associations); the remaining marginal associations in the amniotic fluid and lochial cohorts did not survive correction and are therefore best regarded as exploratory. These false-discovery-rate results refer to univariate associations; in multivariable models, older maternal age was the most consistent independent correlate of non-albicans Candida across compartments, whereas gestational age was not retained as an independent predictor.
A distinctive feature of the present series is the consistent predominance of Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei) among non-albicans Candida isolates across all three compartments (19.0% in amniotic fluid, 26.58% in vaginal discharge, and 21.3% in lochia), greatly exceeding Nakaseomyces glabratus (formerly Candida glabrata; 2.5%, 4.06%, and 2.1%, respectively). This distribution diverges from most published vulvovaginal and perinatal series, in which N. glabratus is the predominant non-albicans species and P. kudriavzevii a minor component. In a Lebanese pregnancy cohort, C. glabrata accounted for 44.5% of vulvovaginal candidiasis versus 12.1% for C. krusei [47]; in a Ghanaian antenatal series, C. glabrata was the single most frequently isolated species overall (57.4%) [48]; and in a Vietnamese cohort of non-pregnant women of reproductive age, C. glabrata (11.37%) again exceeded C. krusei (3.92%) [49]. Because presumptive species differentiation in the present study was initially based on chromogenic colony morphology, a krusei-predominant distribution of this magnitude warrants cautious interpretation and cannot be entirely dissociated from the possibility of a species-identification artefact; this consideration is mitigated, although not wholly eliminated, by the confirmatory VITEK® step described in Section 2.2. Several explanations may account for this departure from the C. albicans and N. glabratus patterns reported in most obstetric and vulvovaginal series. Regional and population-level differences in Candida epidemiology are well recognised, and prior azole exposure can favour intrinsically fluconazole-resistant species such as Pichia kudriavzevii. Reliance on chromogenic morphology for the initial differentiation, even with subsequent VITEK® confirmation, may also leave some residual species-level misclassification, which again points to molecular identification as the appropriate means of verification. The atypical nature of this finding is further underscored by the WHO fungal priority pathogens list [1], in which C. albicans is ranked as critical priority; N. glabratus, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis as high priority; and P. kudriavzevii as medium priority. The predominance of a medium-priority yeast over higher-priority non-albicans species is unexpected and warrants confirmation in future studies, ideally incorporating molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility testing.
A more systematic reading of the literature nonetheless shows that a krusei-predominant pattern, although uncommon, is not without precedent. Among symptomatic pregnant women in Northwest Ethiopia, C. krusei (now P. kudriavzevii) was the most frequent non-albicans isolate at 21.9%, exceeding C. glabrata at 17.7% [50]. A similar ranking was reported in pregnant women from Hajjah, Yemen, where C. krusei reached 13.58% against 9.87% for C. glabrata [51], and in a broader Ethiopian vulvovaginal series in which C. krusei (17.2%) clearly outnumbered C. glabrata (3.46%) [52]. In these cohorts, as in ours, P. kudriavzevii was the leading non-albicans species rather than a minor component, at proportions broadly similar to the 19.0–26.6% seen across our three compartments. This convergence with several African and Middle Eastern reports suggests that the present distribution, although atypical for European populations, is epidemiologically plausible and may reflect genuine geographic variation in non-albicans ecology, prior azole exposure, or differences in the identification media used. It does not remove the need for molecular confirmation, since most of these comparators, like the present study, relied on chromogenic or phenotypic identification rather than sequencing or MALDI-TOF MS. The predominance of a medium-priority yeast over higher-priority non-albicans species is unexpected and warrants confirmation in future studies, ideally incorporating molecular identification, such as ITS or D1/D2 sequencing, and antifungal susceptibility testing.
These findings may also reflect the mixed obstetric–gynecological case-mix and the inclusion of clinician-requested Candida-positive cultures. Because clinical indications and recent antimicrobial exposure were unavailable, selection bias and residual confounding cannot be excluded.

Relevance to Integrated Perinatal and Neonatal Microbiological Assessment

The present study may also be interpreted within the broader framework of integrated perinatal and neonatal microbiological assessment. Within neonatal medicine, this framework is grounded in the systematic microbiological assessment of the newborn, in which pathogen identification, infection surveillance, and risk stratification inform the evaluation of neonatal infectious disease and support the integration of maternal and perinatal microbiological data into neonatal risk assessment [53]. Although neonatal cultures, neonatal colonization, and clinically confirmed neonatal infections were not directly evaluated, the analyzed compartments—amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochia—represent biologically relevant interfaces through which fetal or neonatal exposure to fungal organisms may occur. Therefore, these findings should be viewed not as direct evidence of neonatal infection, but as microbiological characterization of maternal and perinatal sources that may be relevant for future neonatal risk stratification. Because the present analysis was retrospective and based on routinely collected, culture-positive isolates rather than paired or longitudinally sampled mother–infant dyads, it characterizes species distribution at the level of the isolate and cannot address temporal sequence, within-patient dynamics, or vertical transmission.
Amniotic fluid cultures are particularly important in this framework because they represent the compartment most directly related to the intrauterine environment. The predominance of Candida albicans in amniotic fluid isolates confirms its major role among Candida-positive intra-amniotic cultures, while the identification of non-albicans Candida, especially Pichia kudriavzevii, highlights the need for species-level reporting. In the context of neonatal microbiological evaluation, such information may be useful because fetal exposure to different Candida species may have distinct clinical implications, particularly in preterm or otherwise vulnerable neonates. However, in the absence of paired neonatal cultures, the present data cannot establish vertical transmission or neonatal disease.
Vaginal discharge cultures provide complementary information regarding maternal genital tract colonization. During birth, the newborn may be exposed to maternal vaginal microorganisms, and Candida-positive vaginal cultures may therefore represent a relevant component of the perinatal microbial environment. In the present study, Candida albicans remained the predominant species, but the substantial proportion of non-albicans Candida suggests that species-level identification may be clinically informative, particularly in complicated, recurrent, symptomatic, or high-risk obstetric settings. This is relevant to future neonatal microbiological assessment because maternal genital tract colonization may be considered alongside neonatal cultures, delivery mode, gestational age, rupture of membranes, intrapartum antimicrobial exposure, and neonatal clinical status.
Lochial cultures may reflect the early postpartum genital microbial environment. Although the relationship between lochial Candida isolation and neonatal infection is indirect and currently uncertain, postpartum maternal colonization may contribute to the microbial context in which early neonatal exposure occurs. From the perspective of complex neonatal microbiological evaluation, lochial cultures may therefore be considered as part of the broader maternal–neonatal microbial interface, particularly in studies designed to evaluate early-life colonization, environmental exposure, or postpartum infectious risk.
Overall, the findings support the concept that neonatal microbiological assessment should be interpreted within a wider perinatal context. The study does not demonstrate neonatal candidiasis, neonatal sepsis, or vertical transmission; however, it characterizes Candida species in maternal and perinatal compartments that may influence fetal or neonatal microbial exposure. Future research should integrate paired maternal and neonatal sampling, neonatal culture or molecular testing, antifungal susceptibility profiling, and detailed clinical outcome data in order to determine whether specific maternal Candida species, specific perinatal compartments, or non-albicans Candida profiles are associated with neonatal colonization, early-onset fungal infection, prematurity-related morbidity, or other neonatal outcomes.
Several methodological limitations should be acknowledged when interpreting these findings. Because the amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial isolates were obtained from independent routine cultures rather than from paired or longitudinally followed women, the present analysis does not capture within-patient microbiological transitions across the perinatal period and should be read as a cross-sectional comparison of species distribution between three sample types. In addition, because repeated positive cultures from the same patient could not be reliably identified and removed from the laboratory dataset, an individual woman may have contributed more than one isolate; the unit of analysis is therefore the isolate rather than the patient, and potential clustering of isolates at the patient level could not be accounted for in the statistical models. Because this within-patient clustering could not be modelled, the assumption of independent observations that underlies the reported p-values and 95% confidence intervals is likely violated; positive intraclass correlation among isolates from the same woman would tend to narrow the confidence intervals and inflate the apparent statistical significance, so all associations should be interpreted as isolate-level and hypothesis-generating rather than as precise patient-level estimates. A further limitation concerns the composition of the vaginal discharge group, which comprised cultures from both pregnant and non-pregnant women across the full age range, including peri- and post-menopausal patients, and therefore represents a mixed gynecological and obstetric population rather than a strictly perinatal one. Obstetric and fetal variables are undefined for non-pregnant women; accordingly, these variables were analyzed only within the pregnant stratum, and associations involving them should not be generalized to the vaginal discharge cohort as a whole. Finally, because the total number of cultures performed was not available, culture positivity, prevalence, incidence, and hospital-level burden could not be estimated; the reported proportions describe the relative species distribution among Candida-positive cultures and should not be interpreted as measures of frequency in the source obstetric and gynecological population. Furthermore, the analysed dataset comprised Candida-positive cultures identified through routine laboratory records, without accompanying symptom, clinical-diagnosis, microscopy, inflammatory, or treatment data; consequently, the retrospective design did not allow colonization to be consistently distinguished from clinically confirmed candidiasis, and the present results should be interpreted as reflecting culture positivity rather than documented Candida infection.
The clinical indication for each culture (for example, symptomatic infection versus routine screening) and data on recent antibiotic or antifungal exposure, hospitalization, cervical cerclage, and immunosuppression were not available from the laboratory records; these unrecorded factors may influence species distribution and contribute to selection bias. Several additional limitations should also be acknowledged. First, this was a retrospective, single-center study conducted at one tertiary obstetrics and gynecology hospital; the observed species distribution and associations may therefore not be generalizable to other populations, regions, or care settings with different case-mix, referral patterns, and laboratory practices. Second, because the data were extracted from routine laboratory and clinical records, several maternal, obstetric, and clinical variables were incompletely documented; missing values were handled by analyzing only the cultures for which the relevant variable was available, which reduced the effective sample size for some comparisons and may have introduced selection effects. Third, several comorbidities and clinical categories were represented by very few isolates, so the corresponding subgroup proportions and regression estimates are statistically unstable and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating; to mitigate this, continuous predictors were preferred and sparse categories were collapsed where feasible in the multivariable models. Fourth, a large number of variables were tested across the three sample types, so the univariate associations were exploratory in nature; although Benjamini–Hochberg correction was applied within each sample type to limit false-positive results, residual type I error cannot be excluded, and the associations require confirmation in independent cohorts. Species identification relied on chromogenic media with confirmatory VITEK® testing; molecular or proteomic methods (MALDI-TOF MS or ITS sequencing) were not routinely available, which constrains the identification of uncommon species. Finally, antifungal susceptibility testing was not performed, so the clinical implications of the non-albicans Candida and Pichia kudriavzevii proportions—particularly regarding azole resistance—could not be evaluated and remain inferences drawn from the literature rather than from the present isolates.
Although several predictors were statistically significant, all models showed limited discrimination (AUC 0.60–0.68), low explained variance (Nagelkerke R2 0.038–0.099), and poor sensitivity in most strata. The reversed sensitivity–specificity pattern in the non-pregnant stratum likely reflected class imbalance at the 0.5 probability threshold rather than strong predictive performance. Accordingly, these models should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than as clinically predictive tools. Taken together, these limitations indicate that the findings describe isolate-level patterns among clinician-selected Candida-positive cultures rather than infection prevalence, causal relationships, or clinically confirmed candidiasis in the source population. The aggregated non-albicans Candida outcome—including named species, Candida spp. isolates without definitive species-level identification, and six mixed cultures—was used only for exploratory modelling and should not be interpreted as species-specific. Because identification relied on definitive VITEK® results without retained confidence or discordance data and without orthogonal molecular confirmation, uncommon species distributions require independent validation. The limited discrimination and explained variance of the models further support their interpretation as hypothesis-generating rather than clinically predictive.

5. Conclusions

Candida albicans was the predominant species across all sample types, while non-albicans Candida, particularly Pichia kudriavzevii, represented a substantial minority, consistent with the broader trend toward non-albicans species reported in the literature. Species distribution was compartment-dependent. In amniotic fluid, species distribution was largely independent of clinical variables; older maternal age and lower parity were the independent correlates of non-albicans Candida, whereas gestational age was not retained in multivariable analysis. In lochial cultures, parity remained the only association after false-discovery-rate correction, whereas maternal age and parity were retained as modest independent correlates in multivariable analysis, indicating a relatively homogeneous postpartum profile. In contrast, vaginal discharge demonstrated multiple significant associations, including maternal age, reproductive status, pregnancy characteristics, and selected comorbidities, reflecting a more complex host–microbiota interaction. C. albicans predominated in women of reproductive age and during pregnancy, whereas non-albicans species were relatively more frequent in older and non-pregnant women, consistent with an estrogen-dependent gynecological pattern rather than an association with adverse pregnancy or fetal outcomes. Multivariable models showed only limited discriminatory performance across all groups, indicating that species distribution is multifactorial and not fully explained by clinical variables. These findings emphasize the importance of species-level identification, particularly for non-albicans Candida, for microbiological surveillance and characterization of the species distribution among culture-positive isolates; assessing its implications for clinical management and antifungal stewardship would require antifungal susceptibility and treatment data, which were not available in this study. More broadly, by characterizing Candida-positive maternal and perinatal compartments that may contribute to fetal or neonatal microbial exposure, the study provides perinatal microbiological context that may support future integrated, complex microbiological evaluation of newborns; it does not, however, itself assess neonatal colonization, neonatal infection, or vertical transmission.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.I. and R.G.U.; methodology, S.G.I., L.S.I., E.T.C. and R.G.U.; software, E.T.C. and C.D.; validation, C.D.D., D.G.S., A.G., E.P.A. and M.G.; formal analysis, S.G.I. and E.T.C.; investigation, S.G.I., E.T.C. and D.C.; resources, D.G.S., M.G., I.D.C. and L.S.I.; data curation, E.T.C., C.D. and D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.I. and E.T.C.; writing—review and editing, R.G.U., C.D.D., D.G.S., M.G., I.D.C. and L.S.I.; visualization, E.T.C. and C.D.D.; supervision, R.G.U.; project administration, R.G.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Health Programme (PS) 2021–2027, Policy Objective 4, Priority 3, Project title ‘Support for Enhancing Performance and Innovation in Excellent Medical Doctoral Research’, acronym INNODOC-MED, SMIS code 351058.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the “Cuza Vodă” Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Iasi, (Approval No. 28/11/2024 and ethical opinion issued on 23 January 2025) and by the Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Iasi (Approval No. 523/25.01.2025 and ethical opinion issued on 25 January 2025) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Candidiasis. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/candidiasis/index.html (accessed on 26 March 2026).
  3. Maki, Y.; Fujisaki, M.; Sato, Y.; Sameshima, H. Candida chorioamnionitis leads to preterm birth and adverse fetal–neonatal outcome. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 2017, 9060138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gigi, R.M.S.; Buitrago-Garcia, D.; Taghavi, K.; Dunaiski, C.-M.; van de Wijgert, J.H.H.M.; Peters, R.P.H.; Low, N. Vulvovaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health 2023, 23, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Disha, T.; Haque, F. Prevalence and risk factors of vulvovaginal candidosis during pregnancy: A review. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 2022, 6195712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ionescu, S.; Luchian, I.; Damian, C.; Goriuc, A.; Porumb-Andrese, E.; Popa, C.G.; Cobzaru, R.G.; Ripa, C.; Ursu, R.G. Candida auris Updates: Outbreak Evaluation through Molecular Assays and Antifungal Stewardship—A Narrative Review. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 6069–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gerede, A.; Nikolettos, K.; Vavoulidis, E.; Margioula-Siarkou, C.; Petousis, S.; Giourga, M.; Fotinopoulos, P.; Salagianni, M.; Stavros, S.; Dinas, K.; et al. Vaginal microbiome and pregnancy complications: A review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Farr, A.; Effendy, I.; Frey Tirri, B.; Hof, H.; Mayser, P.; Petricevic, L.; Ruhnke, M.; Schaller, M.; Schaefer, A.P.A.; Sustr, V.; et al. Guideline: Vulvovaginal candidosis (AWMF 015/072, level S2k). Mycoses 2021, 64, 583–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Workowski, K.A.; Bachmann, L.H.; Chan, P.A.; Johnston, C.M.; Muzny, C.A.; Park, I.; Reno, H.; Zenilman, J.M.; Bolan, G.A. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2021, 70, 1–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nyirjesy, P.; Brookhart, C.; Lazenby, G.; Schwebke, J.; Sobel, J.D. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: A review of the evidence for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, S162–S168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kidd, S.E.; Abdolrasouli, A.; Hagen, F. Fungal nomenclature: Managing change is the name of the game. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2023, 10, ofac559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Messina, A.; Mariani, A.; Brandolisio, R.; Tavella, E.; Germano, C.; Lipari, G.; Leo, L.; Masturzo, B.; Manzoni, P. Candidiasis in pregnancy: Relevant aspects of the pathology for the mother and the fetus and therapeutic strategies. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Akinosoglou, K.; Livieratos, A.; Asimos, K.; Donders, F.; Donders, G.G.G. Fluconazole-resistant vulvovaginal candidosis: An update on current management. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chayachinda, C.; Thamkhantho, M.; Rekhawasin, T.; Klerdklinhom, C. Sertaconazole 300 mg versus clotrimazole 500 mg vaginal suppository for treating pregnant women with acute vaginal candidiasis: A double-blinded, randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024, 24, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, R.; Ji, L.; Chen, J.; Nie, C.; Huang, W. Alterations of the paired maternal vaginal microbiome and neonatal meconium microbiome in vulvovaginal candidiasis-positive pregnant women. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1480200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Neumann, C.J.; Pausan, M.-R.; Haid, V.; Weiss, E.-C.; Kolovetsiou-Kreiner, V.; Amtmann, B.; Winkler, P.; Mahnert, A.; Jantscher-Krenn, E.; Moissl-Eichinger, C. The dynamics of the female microbiome: Unveiling abrupt changes of microbial domains across body sites from prepartum to postpartum phases. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e00147-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hussen, I.; Aliyo, A.; Abbai, M.K.; Dedecha, W. Vaginal candidiasis prevalence, associated factors, and antifungal susceptibility patterns among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024, 24, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nguyen, T.A.; Kim, H.Y.; Stocker, S.; Kidd, S.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Dao, A.; Harrison, T.; Wahyuningsih, R.; Rickerts, V.; Perfect, J.; et al. Pichia kudriavzevii (Candida krusei): A systematic review to inform the World Health Organisation priority list of fungal pathogens. Med. Mycol. 2024, 62, myad132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gedefie, A.; Shimeles, G.; Motbainor, H.; Kassanew, B.; Genet, C. Vaginal colonization and vertical transmission of Candida species: Prevalence and associated factors among pregnant women and their neonates at public health facilities of Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025, 25, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ionescu, S.G.; Dimitriu, C.D.; Socolov, D.G.; Grigore, M.; Iancu, L.S.; Damian, C.; Cobzaru, R.G.; Ripa, C.V.; Costin, D.; Popa, R.-F.; et al. Candida susceptibility to antifungals in amniotic fluid: A preliminary study. Pathogens 2025, 14, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bruner, J.P.; Elliott, J.P.; Kilbride, H.W.; Garite, T.J.; Knox, G.E. Candida chorioamnionitis diagnosed by amniocentesis with subsequent fetal infection. Am. J. Perinatol. 1986, 3, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chaim, W.; Mazor, M.; Wiznitzer, A. The prevalence and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection with Candida species in women with preterm labor. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 1992, 251, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Takahasi, C.K.G.; Pinto, M.R.; da Silva, G.; Paes, A.; da Cunha, C.A. Fungal chorioamnionitis by Candida albicans in a low-risk pregnant woman: Case report. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2026, 30, 105165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Best, K.A.; McKinney, J.; Alkhasawneh, A.; McCullough, D.C.; Sanchez-Ramos, L. Amniotic fluid “sludge” due to intra-amniotic infection/inflammation with Candida albicans. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 227, 329–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maraki, S.; Stafylaki, D.; Karageorgos, S.A.; Koutroumpakis, F.; Hamilos, G.; Makrigiannakis, A.; Samonis, G. Antifungal activity of amniotic fluid against different Candida species. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2021, 38, 148–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hurley, R.; de Louvois, J. Candida vaginitis. Postgrad. Med. J. 1979, 55, 645–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ross, J.M.; Needham, J.R. Genital flora during pregnancy and colonization of the newborn. J. R. Soc. Med. 1980, 73, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mendling, W. Yeasts in pregnancy and neonatal mycoses. In Vulvovaginal Candidosis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  29. Eskezia, A.; Teklemichael, A.M.; Alemayehu, T. The prevalence and risk factors of vaginal Candida species and group B Streptococcus colonization in pregnant women attending antenatal care at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Hawassa City, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025, 25, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ohale, O.J.; Wemedo, S.A.; Akani, N.P. Prevalence of candidiasis among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Eleme and Okrika Local Government Areas of Rivers State. S. Asian J. Res. Microbiol. 2022, 14, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Agrawal, S.; Ghosh, S.; Kumar, A.; Datta, S. Prevalence and outcome of vulvovaginal candidiasis among pregnant women: A study at a tertiary care hospital. J. NTR Univ. Health Sci. 2025, 14, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Srb, N.; Talapko, J.; Meštrović, T.; Fureš, R.; Škrlec, I. A comprehensive overview of Candida albicans as the leading pathogen in vulvovaginal candidiasis. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kostiani, G.M.; Adnyana, I.G.H.E.; Permana, G.I.; Mohpul, A.; Kurniawan, M.Y.I.; Indrawan, A.V.; Ikhsan, Y.; Mutiasari, D.; Toemon, A.I.; Ratnasari, A.; et al. Prevalence of Candida albicans in women vaginal discharge in Palangka Raya City, Indonesia. Pros. Asos. Institusi Pendidik. Tinggi Teknol. Lab. Med. Indones. 2025, 4, 210–215. Available online: https://prosiding.aiptlmi-iasmlt.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/407 (accessed on 23 July 2026).
  34. Sana, S.H.; Ashraf, S. Assessment of excessive vaginal discharge (Sailan-ur-Reham): A major, neglected health problem among adolescents. Int. J. Unani Integr. Med. 2019, 3, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Youssef, A.A.; Abdul Karim, D.M.; Hassan, D.M. Epidemiology and clinico-investigative study of abnormal vaginal discharge during pregnancy. Evid. Based Womens Health J. 2025, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khatun, A.; Sharma, A.; Solanki, S.; Faujdar, S.S.; Mehrishi, P.; Kumar, A. Detection of Candida species in genitourinary tract among immunocompromised patients attending rural teaching hospital. Ann. Afr. Med. 2026, 25, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nwokike, B.C.; Ibekwe, E.N.; Nwosu, A.C.; Ezeh, B.A.; Ngwogu, A.C. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis among female students in Abia State University Teaching Hospital Aba, Nigeria. S. Asian J. Res. Microbiol. 2025, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Roy, M.; Majumdar, T.; Ray, J. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnant women attending a tertiary care centre in North-Eastern India. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2024, 52, 100738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Purnamasari, I.; Ervianti, E.; Damayanti; Prasetyo, B.; Astari, L.; Endraswari, P.D.; Listiawan, M.Y.; Prakoeswa, C.R.S. Pattern of Candida species isolated from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy. Berk. Ilmu Kesehat. Kulit Dan Kelamin 2022, 34, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maftei, N.-M.; Arbune, M.; Georgescu, C.V.; Elisei, A.M.; Iancu, A.V.; Tatu, A.L. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy—Between sensitivity and resistance to antimycotics. J. Xenobiotics 2023, 13, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yadav, D.; Baidya, P.; Aryal, M.; Yadav, P.; Rai, K.R.; Shrestha, P.; Aryal, M. Fluconazole-resistant vulvovaginal candidiasis in reproductive-age women: A study from Himalayan country. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bellusci, L.S.L.; Ferreira, C.S.; Okada, J.K.; Souza, N.S.; Vieira, K.C.O.; Oliveira, D.V.M.; Eller, L.K.W. Candida spp. species distribution and biofilm patterns in women of childbearing age: An epidemiological study. Medicina 2025, 58, e-221162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sasi, S.; Abdelmajid, A.; Salah, H.; Ibrahim, E.; Al-Maslamani, M.; Al-Khal, A. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans: A retrospective study. Cureus 2025, 17, e78906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nishino, C.; Kawamura, H.; Hattori, Y.; Orisaka, M.; Yoshida, Y. Asymptomatic vaginal candidiasis complicated by chorioamnionitis and pelvic abscess at full-term delivery: A case report. Cureus 2025, 17, e79906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rajasekaran, K.; Kumaresan, S.; Vellaisamy, S.G.; Gopalan, K. The art of diagnosis: Unraveling the mystery of vaginal discharge? Indian J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS 2025, 46, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Domachowske, J.B.; Eliscu, A.H.; Jacobs, Z.; Burstein, G.R. Vaginitis, mucopurulent cervicitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease: Vaginal discharge. In Introduction to Clinical Infectious Diseases: A Problem-Based Approach; Domachowske, J.B., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ghaddar, N.; El Roz, A.; Ghssein, G.; Ibrahim, J.-N. Emergence of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Lebanese Pregnant Women: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Species Distribution. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 5016810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Waikhom, S.D.; Afeke, I.; Kwawu, G.S.; Mbroh, H.K.; Osei, G.Y.; Louis, B.; Deku, J.G.; Kasu, E.S.; Mensah, P.; Agede, C.Y.; et al. Prevalence of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Pregnant Women in the Ho Municipality, Ghana: Species Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Isolates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Do, N.A.; Dao, N.H.; Tran, V.T.; Vu, N.D.; Vu, T.S.; Nguyen, V.L.; Nguyen, T.V.; Nguyen, T.N.Q.; Nguyen, V.T.; Le, Q.T.; et al. Prevalence, Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida albicans Causing Vaginal Discharge among Symptomatic Non-Pregnant Women of Reproductive Age at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Vietnam. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tsega, A.; Mekonnen, F. Prevalence, Risk Factors and Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Candida Species among Pregnant Women at Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ali, M.; Edrees, W.H.; Al-Shehari, W.A.; Xue, G.; Al-Hammadi, S.; Qasem, E.A.; Chaulagain, R.P.; Lal, N. Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Candida Species Isolated from Pregnant Women. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1434677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bitew, A.; Abebaw, Y. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Species Distribution of Candida and Their Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern. BMC Womens Health 2018, 18, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Coșovanu, E.-T.; Balan, T.A.; Coșovanu, E.-O.; Ionescu, S.; Damian, C.; Petroaie, A.D.; Coman, E.-A.; Grigore, M.; Socolov, D.; Balan, R.A.; et al. Neonatal infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: An analysis of prevalence, risk factors, and therapeutic implications—A narrative review. Pathogens 2026, 15, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study population and analytical workflow. A total of 3089 Candida-positive cultures collected between January and December 2024 were included and analyzed according to sample type: amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures. Vaginal discharge cultures were further stratified by pregnancy status; obstetric and fetal variables were analyzed only within the pregnant stratum.
Figure 1. Study population and analytical workflow. A total of 3089 Candida-positive cultures collected between January and December 2024 were included and analyzed according to sample type: amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures. Vaginal discharge cultures were further stratified by pregnancy status; obstetric and fetal variables were analyzed only within the pregnant stratum.
Pathogens 15 00797 g001
Figure 2. Candida species distribution across amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures. The figure shows the proportional distribution of Candida species among culture-positive isolates within each sample type: amniotic fluid (N = 242), vaginal discharge (N = 2020), and lochial cultures (N = 827). Candida albicans predominated in all three sample types, whereas Pichia kudriavzevii was the leading non-albicans Candida species. Candida spp. denotes isolates confirmed at the genus level but not differentiated to species level. Candida parapsilosis was detected only in vaginal discharge cultures (0.05%). Polymicrobial co-isolations were counted under their non-albicans component, as described in Section 2.
Figure 2. Candida species distribution across amniotic fluid, vaginal discharge, and lochial cultures. The figure shows the proportional distribution of Candida species among culture-positive isolates within each sample type: amniotic fluid (N = 242), vaginal discharge (N = 2020), and lochial cultures (N = 827). Candida albicans predominated in all three sample types, whereas Pichia kudriavzevii was the leading non-albicans Candida species. Candida spp. denotes isolates confirmed at the genus level but not differentiated to species level. Candida parapsilosis was detected only in vaginal discharge cultures (0.05%). Polymicrobial co-isolations were counted under their non-albicans component, as described in Section 2.
Pathogens 15 00797 g002
Table 1. Association between Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida isolates and maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics in amniotic fluid cultures (N = 242).
Table 1. Association between Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida isolates and maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics in amniotic fluid cultures (N = 242).
VariableCategoryTotal, n (%)Candida albicans, n (%)Non-albicans Candida, n (%)p-Value
Maternal demographics
Maternal age group13–17 years16 (6.6%)14 (8.3%)2 (2.7%)0.133
18–22 years55 (22.7%)45 (26.6%)10 (13.7%)
23–27 years65 (26.9%)40 (23.7%)25 (34.2%)
28–32 years42 (17.4%)27 (16.0%)15 (20.5%)
33–37 years48 (19.8%)31 (18.3%)17 (23.3%)
38–42 years13 (5.4%)10 (5.9%)3 (4.1%)
43–47 years3 (1.2%)2 (1.2%)1 (1.4%)
Place of residenceRural169 (69.8%)114 (67.5%)55 (75.3%)0.220
Urban73 (30.2%)55 (32.5%)18 (24.7%)
Month of samplingJanuary21 (8.7%)13 (7.7%)8 (11.0%)0.040
February13 (5.4%)7 (4.1%)6 (8.2%)
March23 (9.5%)22 (13.0%)1 (1.4%)
April13 (5.4%)12 (7.1%)1 (1.4%)
May24 (9.9%)18 (10.7%)6 (8.2%)
June12 (5.0%)9 (5.3%)3 (4.1%)
July21 (8.7%)15 (8.9%)6 (8.2%)
August14 (5.8%)6 (3.6%)8 (11.0%)
September24 (9.9%)18 (10.7%)6 (8.2%)
October19 (7.9%)12 (7.1%)7 (9.6%)
November35 (14.5%)22 (13.0%)13 (17.8%)
December23 (9.5%)15 (8.9%)8 (11.0%)
Maternal BMINormal weight237 (97.9%)168 (99.4%)69 (94.5%)0.029
Obesity class I4 (1.7%)1 (0.6%)3 (4.1%)
Obesity class II1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Chronic smokingNon-smoker241 (99.6%)168 (99.4%)73 (100.0%)1.000
Smoker1 (0.4%)1 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Obstetric history and reproductive context
Gravidity groupPrimigravida92 (38.0%)62 (36.7%)30 (41.1%)0.138
Multigravida126 (52.1%)86 (50.9%)40 (54.8%)
Grand multigravida24 (9.9%)21 (12.4%)3 (4.1%)
Parity groupNulliparous10 (4.1%)7 (4.1%)3 (4.1%)0.096
Primiparous111 (45.9%)72 (42.6%)39 (53.4%)
Multiparous110 (45.5%)79 (46.7%)31 (42.5%)
Grand multiparous11 (4.5%)11 (6.5%)0 (0.0%)
Previous caesarean sectionAbsent214 (88.4%)150 (88.8%)64 (87.7%)0.808
Present28 (11.6%)19 (11.2%)9 (12.3%)
In vitro fertilization (IVF)Absent236 (97.5%)165 (97.6%)71 (97.3%)1.000
Present6 (2.5%)4 (2.4%)2 (2.7%)
Current pregnancy and intrapartum features
Gestational age groupFirst trimester2 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)2 (2.7%)0.001
Second trimester17 (7.0%)7 (4.1%)10 (13.7%)
Third trimester223 (92.1%)162 (95.9%)61 (83.6%)
Status of fetal membranesSpontaneously ruptured187 (77.3%)133 (78.7%)54 (74.0%)0.778
Intact52 (21.5%)34 (20.1%)18 (24.7%)
Fissured3 (1.2%)2 (1.2%)1 (1.4%)
Onset of laborNo labor101 (41.7%)65 (38.5%)36 (49.3%)0.272
Pre-labor80 (33.1%)60 (35.5%)20 (27.4%)
Induced61 (25.2%)44 (26.0%)17 (23.3%)
Pregnancy complication (antepartum)None165 (68.2%)119 (70.4%)46 (63.0%)0.129
Threatened preterm labor52 (21.5%)38 (22.5%)14 (19.2%)
Threatened miscarriage12 (5.0%)4 (2.4%)8 (11.0%)
IUGR/Threatened preterm labor2 (0.8%)1 (0.6%)1 (1.4%)
IUGR3 (1.2%)2 (1.2%)1 (1.4%)
Polyhydramnios/IUGR1 (0.4%)1 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Polyhydramnios2 (0.8%)1 (0.6%)1 (1.4%)
Polyhydramnios/Threatened preterm labor2 (0.8%)1 (0.6%)1 (1.4%)
Placenta praevia1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Placenta praevia/Threatened preterm labor2 (0.8%)2 (1.2%)0 (0.0%)
Vaginal bleedingAbsent241 (99.6%)169 (100.0%)72 (98.6%)0.302
Present1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Vaginal infectionsAbsent239 (98.8%)168 (99.4%)71 (97.3%)0.217
Present3 (1.2%)1 (0.6%)2 (2.7%)
Obstetric hemorrhageAbsent241 (99.6%)169 (100.0%)72 (98.6%)0.302
Present1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Rh incompatibilityAbsent218 (90.1%)156 (92.3%)62 (84.9%)0.078
Present24 (9.9%)13 (7.7%)11 (15.1%)
Maternal comorbidities
DiabetesNo diabetes238 (98.3%)167 (98.8%)71 (97.3%)0.454
Gestational diabetes mellitus3 (1.2%)1 (0.6%)2 (2.7%)
Type 1 diabetes mellitus1 (0.4%)1 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Pregnancy-induced hypertensionAbsent231 (95.5%)161 (95.3%)70 (95.9%)1.000
Present11 (4.5%)8 (4.7%)3 (4.1%)
Thyroid disordersAbsent240 (99.2%)167 (98.8%)73 (100.0%)1.000
Present2 (0.8%)2 (1.2%)0 (0.0%)
Inherited thrombophiliaAbsent230 (95.0%)164 (97.0%)66 (90.4%)0.048
Present12 (5.0%)5 (3.0%)7 (9.6%)
History of renal diseaseAbsent239 (98.8%)166 (98.2%)73 (100.0%)0.556
Present3 (1.2%)3 (1.8%)0 (0.0%)
HepatitisAbsent241 (99.6%)169 (100.0%)72 (98.6%)0.302
Hepatitis B1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Ocular disordersAbsent239 (98.8%)168 (99.4%)71 (97.3%)0.217
Present3 (1.2%)1 (0.6%)2 (2.7%)
Uterine leiomyomaAbsent237 (97.9%)167 (98.8%)70 (95.9%)0.163
Present5 (2.1%)2 (1.2%)3 (4.1%)
Fetal characteristics and outcomes
Fetal presentation at deliveryCephalic220 (90.9%)154 (91.1%)66 (90.4%)0.759
Breech18 (7.4%)12 (7.1%)6 (8.2%)
Transverse lie2 (0.8%)2 (1.2%)0 (0.0%)
Cephalic/Transverse lie (twin pregnancy)1 (0.4%)1 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Not recorded1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Fetal conditionsNone207 (85.5%)149 (88.2%)58 (79.5%)0.187
Single nuchal cord27 (11.2%)16 (9.5%)11 (15.1%)
Double nuchal cord6 (2.5%)3 (1.8%)3 (4.1%)
Abnormal fetal Doppler findings1 (0.4%)1 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Fetal duodenal stenosis1 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)1 (1.4%)
Fetal outcomeLive singleton fetus241 (99.6%)168 (99.4%)73 (100.0%)1.000
Live twin fetuses1 (0.4%)1 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
Notes: Data are presented as n (%). Percentages in the Total column are calculated relative to the applicable denominator (N = 242 for all variables in this cohort). Percentages for Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida are within-group (column) percentages, calculated relative to the respective species-group totals (Candida albicans, n = 169; non-albicans Candida, n = 73). The single co-isolation of C. albicans and Nakaseomyces glabratus was assigned to the non-albicans Candida group. Statistical tests: Between-group comparisons used Pearson’s chi-square test when all expected cell counts were ≥5, Fisher’s exact test for 2 × 2 tables with any expected count < 5, and a Monte Carlo approximation of the exact test (chi-square statistic; 100,000 resamples) for larger tables with any expected count < 5. Reported p-values are two-sided and unadjusted; values in bold denote p < 0.05. False-discovery-rate correction was applied separately within each sample type (amniotic fluid, lochia, and vaginal discharge) using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure; within the amniotic fluid cohort, only gestational age group remained significant after correction (q = 0.028), and all other associations had q ≥ 0.34. Parity and gravidity: Parity was categorized as nulliparous (0 births), primiparous (1 birth), multiparous (2–4 births), and grand multiparous (≥5 births); gravidity as primigravida (1 pregnancy), multigravida (2–4 pregnancies), and grand multigravida (≥5 pregnancies). The same thresholds are applied throughout. Fetal presentation: One record contained “cervical insufficiency” in the fetal-presentation field and was treated as missing/not recorded; the association test for this variable was therefore based on 241 records. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; IVF, in vitro fertilization; Rh, rhesus factor.
Table 2. Association between Candida species distribution and maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics in lochia cultures.
Table 2. Association between Candida species distribution and maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics in lochia cultures.
VariableCategoryTotal (N = 827), n (%)Candida albicans (n = 553), n (%)Non-albicans Candida (n = 274), n (%)p-Value
Maternal demographics
Month of samplingJanuary68 (8.2%)41 (7.4%)27 (9.9%)0.110
February83 (10.0%)49 (8.9%)34 (12.4%)
March73 (8.8%)56 (10.1%)17 (6.2%)
April54 (6.5%)35 (6.3%)19 (6.9%)
May68 (8.2%)38 (6.9%)30 (10.9%)
June48 (5.8%)29 (5.2%)19 (6.9%)
July68 (8.2%)47 (8.5%)21 (7.7%)
August63 (7.6%)47 (8.5%)16 (5.8%)
September78 (9.4%)56 (10.1%)22 (8.0%)
October91 (11.0%)66 (11.9%)25 (9.1%)
November69 (8.3%)43 (7.8%)26 (9.5%)
December64 (7.7%)46 (8.3%)18 (6.6%)
Maternal age group13–17 years37 (4.5%)31 (5.6%)6 (2.2%)0.009
18–22 years108 (13.1%)84 (15.2%)24 (8.8%)
23–27 years203 (24.5%)132 (23.9%)71 (25.9%)
28–32 years230 (27.8%)153 (27.7%)77 (28.1%)
33–37 years181 (21.9%)108 (19.5%)73 (26.6%)
38–42 years61 (7.4%)41 (7.4%)20 (7.3%)
43–47 years6 (0.7%)4 (0.7%)2 (0.7%)
48–52 years1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Place of residenceRural490 (59.3%)342 (61.8%)148 (54.0%)0.035
Urban337 (40.7%)211 (38.2%)126 (46.0%)
Maternal BMINormal weight810 (97.9%)540 (97.6%)270 (98.5%)0.044
Obesity class I15 (1.8%)13 (2.4%)2 (0.7%)
Obesity class II1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Obesity class III1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Chronic smokingNon-smoker822 (99.4%)548 (99.1%)274 (100.0%)0.177
Smoker5 (0.6%)5 (0.9%)0 (0.0%)
Obstetric history and reproductive context
Gravidity groupPrimigravida303 (36.6%)189 (34.2%)114 (41.6%)0.068
Multigravida460 (55.6%)316 (57.1%)144 (52.6%)
Grand multigravida64 (7.7%)48 (8.7%)16 (5.8%)
Parity groupNulliparous9 (1.1%)3 (0.5%)6 (2.2%)<0.001
Primiparous371 (44.9%)230 (41.6%)141 (51.5%)
Multiparous422 (51.0%)298 (53.9%)124 (45.3%)
Grand multiparous25 (3.0%)22 (4.0%)3 (1.1%)
Previous caesarean sectionAbsent603 (72.9%)400 (72.3%)203 (74.1%)0.619
Present224 (27.1%)153 (27.7%)71 (25.9%)
In vitro fertilization (IVF)Absent790 (95.5%)529 (95.7%)261 (95.3%)0.858
Present37 (4.5%)24 (4.3%)13 (4.7%)
Current pregnancy and intrapartum features
Gestational age groupSecond trimester4 (0.5%)1 (0.2%)3 (1.1%)0.109
Third trimester823 (99.5%)552 (99.8%)271 (98.9%)
Status of fetal membranesSpontaneously ruptured96 (11.6%)66 (11.9%)30 (10.9%)0.756
Intact729 (88.1%)486 (87.9%)243 (88.7%)
Fissured2 (0.2%)1 (0.2%)1 (0.4%)
Onset of laborPre-labor643 (77.8%)428 (77.4%)215 (78.5%)0.790
Induced184 (22.2%)125 (22.6%)59 (21.5%)
Pregnancy complication (antepartum)None645 (78.0%)443 (80.1%)202 (73.7%)0.122
Placenta praevia94 (11.4%)55 (9.9%)39 (14.2%)
Threatened preterm labor39 (4.7%)27 (4.9%)12 (4.4%)
IUGR23 (2.8%)16 (2.9%)7 (2.6%)
Oligohydramnios9 (1.1%)5 (0.9%)4 (1.5%)
Preeclampsia3 (0.4%)2 (0.4%)1 (0.4%)
Polyhydramnios2 (0.2%)1 (0.2%)1 (0.4%)
Chorioamnionitis1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Multiple/combined complications11 (1.3%)4 (0.7%)7 (2.6%)
Vaginal bleedingAbsent817 (98.8%)546 (98.7%)271 (98.9%)1.000
Present10 (1.2%)7 (1.3%)3 (1.1%)
Vaginal infectionsAbsent814 (98.4%)546 (98.7%)268 (97.8%)0.375
Present13 (1.6%)7 (1.3%)6 (2.2%)
Obstetric hemorrhageAbsent817 (98.8%)547 (98.9%)270 (98.5%)0.738
Present10 (1.2%)6 (1.1%)4 (1.5%)
Rh incompatibilityAbsent790 (95.5%)526 (95.1%)264 (96.4%)0.479
Present37 (4.5%)27 (4.9%)10 (3.6%)
Maternal comorbidities
DiabetesNo diabetes793 (95.9%)531 (96.0%)262 (95.6%)0.819
Gestational diabetes mellitus29 (3.5%)18 (3.3%)11 (4.0%)
Type 1 diabetes mellitus2 (0.2%)2 (0.4%)0 (0.0%)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus3 (0.4%)2 (0.4%)1 (0.4%)
Pregnancy-induced hypertensionAbsent783 (94.7%)523 (94.6%)260 (94.9%)1.000
Present44 (5.3%)30 (5.4%)14 (5.1%)
HypothyroidismAbsent818 (98.9%)547 (98.9%)271 (98.9%)1.000
Present9 (1.1%)6 (1.1%)3 (1.1%)
Inherited thrombophiliaAbsent772 (93.3%)521 (94.2%)251 (91.6%)0.182
Present55 (6.7%)32 (5.8%)23 (8.4%)
History of renal diseaseAbsent817 (98.8%)549 (99.3%)268 (97.8%)0.091
Present10 (1.2%)4 (0.7%)6 (2.2%)
HepatitisAbsent821 (99.3%)549 (99.3%)272 (99.3%)0.777
Hepatitis B3 (0.4%)2 (0.4%)1 (0.4%)
Hepatitis C1 (0.1%)1 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)
Hepatitis B/Hepatitis C co-infection1 (0.1%)1 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)
Hepatic abscess1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Ocular disordersAbsent810 (97.9%)544 (98.4%)266 (97.1%)0.296
Present17 (2.1%)9 (1.6%)8 (2.9%)
Uterine leiomyomaAbsent817 (98.8%)546 (98.7%)271 (98.9%)1.000
Present10 (1.2%)7 (1.3%)3 (1.1%)
Intervertebral disc herniationAbsent823 (99.5%)552 (99.8%)271 (98.9%)0.109
Present4 (0.5%)1 (0.2%)3 (1.1%)
Autoimmune thyroiditisAbsent818 (98.9%)549 (99.3%)269 (98.2%)0.167
Present9 (1.1%)4 (0.7%)5 (1.8%)
CholelithiasisAbsent826 (99.9%)553 (100.0%)273 (99.6%)0.331
Present1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Sinus tachycardiaAbsent825 (99.8%)553 (100.0%)272 (99.3%)0.110
Present2 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)2 (0.7%)
Bronchial asthmaAbsent824 (99.6%)552 (99.8%)272 (99.3%)0.256
Present3 (0.4%)1 (0.2%)2 (0.7%)
Gestational edemaAbsent822 (99.4%)550 (99.5%)272 (99.3%)0.668
Present5 (0.6%)3 (0.5%)2 (0.7%)
Fetal characteristics and outcomes
Fetal presentation at deliveryCephalic (singleton)779 (94.2%)520 (94.0%)259 (94.5%)0.624
Breech (singleton)28 (3.4%)21 (3.8%)7 (2.6%)
Transverse lie (singleton)6 (0.7%)3 (0.5%)3 (1.1%)
Twin/multiple pregnancy14 (1.7%)9 (1.6%)5 (1.8%)
Fetal conditionsNone706 (85.4%)475 (85.9%)231 (84.3%)0.525
Single nuchal cord100 (12.1%)67 (12.1%)33 (12.0%)
Double nuchal cord10 (1.2%)6 (1.1%)4 (1.5%)
Abnormal fetal Doppler findings4 (0.5%)2 (0.4%)2 (0.7%)
Fetal arrhythmia1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.4%)
Fetal macrosomia5 (0.6%)2 (0.4%)3 (1.1%)
Fetal hydronephrosis with ureteral dilatation1 (0.1%)1 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)
Fetal outcomeLive singleton fetus812 (98.2%)543 (98.2%)269 (98.2%)0.853
Live twin fetuses14 (1.7%)9 (1.6%)5 (1.8%)
Non-viable fetus (intrauterine fetal demise)1 (0.1%)1 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)
Notes: BMI = body mass index; IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction. All data are presented as n (%). Percentages in the “Total” column are calculated relative to all cases (N = 827), whereas percentages for Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida represent within-group (column) percentages relative to the respective species-group totals (n = 553 and n = 274). Categorical associations were tested using the chi-square test when all expected cell counts were ≥5, Fisher’s exact test for 2 × 2 tables, and a Monte Carlo approximation of the exact (Fisher–Freeman–Halton) test with 10,000 resamples for larger tables with any expected count < 5. Reported p-values are unadjusted; false-discovery-rate control (Benjamini–Hochberg, applied within each sample type; Section 2.4) and its interpretation are summarized in Section 3 and Section 4. Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Table 3. Association between Candida species distribution and maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics in vaginal discharge.
Table 3. Association between Candida species distribution and maternal, obstetric, and fetal characteristics in vaginal discharge.
VariableCategoryTotal n (%)Candida albicans, n (%)Non-albicans Candida, n (%)p-Value
Maternal demographics
Month of samplingJanuary160 (7.9%)83 (7.4%)77 (8.5%)<0.001
February158 (7.8%)88 (7.9%)70 (7.8%)
March129 (6.4%)70 (6.3%)59 (6.5%)
April113 (5.6%)74 (6.6%)39 (4.3%)
May147 (7.3%)81 (7.2%)66 (7.3%)
June135 (6.7%)66 (5.9%)69 (7.6%)
July167 (8.3%)99 (8.9%)68 (7.5%)
August185 (9.2%)104 (9.3%)81 (9.0%)
September202 (10.0%)127 (11.4%)75 (8.3%)
October242 (12.0%)129 (11.5%)113 (12.5%)
November208 (10.3%)86 (7.7%)122 (13.5%)
December174 (8.6%)111 (9.9%)63 (7.0%)
Age group≤17 years70 (3.5%)57 (5.1%)13 (1.4%)<0.001
18–22 years254 (12.6%)178 (15.9%)76 (8.4%)
23–27 years495 (24.5%)309 (27.6%)186 (20.6%)
28–32 years432 (21.4%)246 (22.0%)186 (20.6%)
33–37 years395 (19.6%)206 (18.4%)189 (21.0%)
38–42 years148 (7.3%)70 (6.3%)78 (8.6%)
43–47 years71 (3.5%)27 (2.4%)44 (4.9%)
48–52 years43 (2.1%)6 (0.5%)37 (4.1%)
53–57 years29 (1.4%)3 (0.3%)26 (2.9%)
58–62 years20 (1.0%)3 (0.3%)17 (1.9%)
63–67 years27 (1.3%)4 (0.4%)23 (2.5%)
68–72 years15 (0.7%)2 (0.2%)13 (1.4%)
73–77 years15 (0.7%)4 (0.4%)11 (1.2%)
78–82 years5 (0.2%)3 (0.3%)2 (0.2%)
83–87 years1 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.1%)
Place of residenceRural1247 (61.7%)705 (63.1%)542 (60.1%)0.172
Urban773 (38.3%)413 (36.9%)360 (39.9%)
Maternal BMINormal weight1989 (98.5%)1097 (98.1%)892 (98.9%)0.456
Obesity class I27 (1.3%)18 (1.6%)9 (1.0%)
Obesity class II2 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)
Obesity class III2 (0.1%)2 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)
Chronic smokingNon-smoker2008 (99.4%)1108 (99.1%)900 (99.8%)0.050
Smoker12 (0.6%)10 (0.9%)2 (0.2%)
Obstetric history and reproductive context
Gravidity groupNulligravida622 (30.8%)261 (23.3%)361 (40.0%)<0.001
Primigravida514 (25.4%)329 (29.4%)185 (20.5%)
Multigravida665 (32.9%)385 (34.4%)280 (31.0%)
Grand multigravida219 (10.8%)143 (12.8%)76 (8.4%)
Parity groupNulliparous839 (41.5%)378 (33.8%)461 (51.1%)<0.001
Primiparous549 (27.2%)356 (31.8%)193 (21.4%)
Multiparous594 (29.4%)355 (31.8%)239 (26.5%)
Grand multiparous38 (1.9%)29 (2.6%)9 (1.0%)
Previous caesarean sectionAbsent1728 (85.5%)937 (83.8%)791 (87.7%)0.014
Present292 (14.5%)181 (16.2%)111 (12.3%)
In vitro fertilization (IVF)Absent1988 (98.4%)1101 (98.5%)887 (98.3%)0.799
Present32 (1.6%)17 (1.5%)15 (1.7%)
InfertilityWithout infertility1998 (98.9%)1113 (99.6%)885 (98.1%)0.002
Primary infertility8 (0.4%)3 (0.3%)5 (0.6%)
Secondary infertility14 (0.7%)2 (0.2%)12 (1.3%)
Current pregnancy and intrapartum features
Gestational age groupFirst trimester237 (14.6%)124 (12.4%)113 (18.0%)0.003
Second trimester355 (21.8%)212 (21.2%)143 (22.7%)
Third trimester1035 (63.6%)662 (66.3%)373 (59.3%)
Status of fetal membranesSpontaneously ruptured13 (1.4%)9 (1.5%)4 (1.1%)0.858
Intact943 (98.5%)597 (98.4%)346 (98.9%)
Fissured1 (0.1%)1 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)
Onset of laborNo labor1221 (75.0%)725 (72.6%)496 (78.9%)0.005
Pre-labor406 (25.0%)273 (27.4%)133 (21.1%)
Pregnancy complication (antepartum)None1204 (74.0%)747 (74.8%)457 (72.7%)0.129
Threatened preterm labor218 (13.4%)142 (14.2%)76 (12.1%)
Threatened miscarriage98 (6.0%)50 (5.0%)48 (7.6%)
Placenta praevia53 (3.3%)27 (2.7%)26 (4.1%)
IUGR12 (0.7%)9 (0.9%)3 (0.5%)
Oligohydramnios10 (0.6%)7 (0.7%)3 (0.5%)
Preeclampsia3 (0.2%)2 (0.2%)1 (0.2%)
Polyhydramnios3 (0.2%)2 (0.2%)1 (0.2%)
Multiple/combined complications26 (1.6%)12 (1.2%)14 (2.2%)
Vaginal bleedingAbsent2012 (99.6%)1113 (99.6%)899 (99.7%)0.738
Present8 (0.4%)5 (0.4%)3 (0.3%)
Vaginal infectionsAbsent2005 (99.3%)1110 (99.3%)895 (99.2%)0.875
Present15 (0.7%)8 (0.7%)7 (0.8%)
Obstetric hemorrhageAbsent1957 (96.9%)1093 (97.8%)864 (95.8%)0.011
Present63 (3.1%)25 (2.2%)38 (4.2%)
Rh incompatibilityAbsent1980 (98.0%)1096 (98.0%)884 (98.0%)0.964
Present40 (2.0%)22 (2.0%)18 (2.0%)
Maternal comorbidities
DiabetesNo diabetes1967 (97.4%)1090 (97.5%)877 (97.2%)0.014
Gestational diabetes mellitus30 (1.5%)21 (1.9%)9 (1.0%)
Type 1 diabetes mellitus8 (0.4%)4 (0.4%)4 (0.4%)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus15 (0.7%)3 (0.3%)12 (1.3%)
Pregnancy-induced hypertension/HTAAbsent1923 (95.2%)1072 (95.9%)851 (94.3%)0.108
Present97 (4.8%)46 (4.1%)51 (5.7%)
HypothyroidismAbsent1994 (98.7%)1110 (99.3%)884 (98.0%)0.011
Present26 (1.3%)8 (0.7%)18 (2.0%)
Inherited thrombophilia/ThrombocytopeniaAbsent1934 (95.7%)1072 (95.9%)862 (95.6%)0.723
Present86 (4.3%)46 (4.1%)40 (4.4%)
History of renal diseaseAbsent1973 (97.7%)1097 (98.1%)876 (97.1%)0.137
Present47 (2.3%)21 (1.9%)26 (2.9%)
Hepatitis/HIVAbsent2009 (99.5%)1113 (99.6%)896 (99.3%)0.746
Hepatitis B8 (0.4%)3 (0.3%)5 (0.6%)
Hepatitis C2 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)1 (0.1%)
HIV1 (0.0%)1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)
Ocular disordersAbsent2004 (99.2%)1108 (99.1%)896 (99.3%)0.563
Present16 (0.8%)10 (0.9%)6 (0.7%)
Uterine leiomyomaAbsent1926 (95.3%)1093 (97.8%)833 (92.4%)<0.001
Present94 (4.7%)25 (2.2%)69 (7.6%)
History of neoplasiaAbsent1991 (98.6%)1107 (99.0%)884 (98.0%)0.057
Present29 (1.4%)11 (1.0%)18 (2.0%)
Fetal characteristics and outcomes
Fetal presentation at deliveryCephalic863 (91.5%)556 (93.1%)307 (88.7%)0.059
Breech62 (6.6%)31 (5.2%)31 (9.0%)
Transverse lie18 (1.9%)10 (1.7%)8 (2.3%)
Fetal conditionsNone1492 (91.7%)915 (91.7%)577 (91.7%)0.729
Single nuchal cord101 (6.2%)64 (6.4%)37 (5.9%)
Double nuchal cord1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.2%)
Abnormal fetal Doppler findings5 (0.3%)2 (0.2%)3 (0.5%)
Intrauterine fetal demise16 (1.0%)9 (0.9%)7 (1.1%)
Other rare conditions12 (0.7%)8 (0.8%)4 (0.6%)
Fetal outcomeLive singleton fetus1580 (97.1%)974 (97.6%)606 (96.3%)0.297
Live twin fetuses31 (1.9%)15 (1.5%)16 (2.5%)
Non-viable fetus (intrauterine fetal demise)16 (1.0%)9 (0.9%)7 (1.1%)
Notes: BMI, body mass index; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; HTA, arterial hypertension; IVF, in vitro fertilization; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. All data are presented as n (%). Percentages in the Total column are calculated relative to the applicable denominator for each variable; percentages for Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida are within-group percentages, calculated relative to the total number of isolates in each species group (C. albicans, n = 1118; non-albicans Candida, n = 902). For variables applicable to the whole cohort, the denominator is the complete set of vaginal discharge isolates (N = 2020). For pregnancy- and fetus-specific variables (gestational age, status of the fetal membranes, onset of labour, antepartum pregnancy complication, fetal presentation, fetal conditions, and fetal outcome), which apply only to women who were pregnant at the time of sampling, percentages are calculated among currently pregnant patients (valid n = 1627), and the 393 non-pregnant women were excluded as not applicable; for status of the fetal membranes and fetal presentation, percentages are further restricted to patients with a documented value (n = 957 and n = 943, respectively), with observations recorded as “not recorded” excluded as missing data. For antepartum pregnancy complications and fetal conditions, “None” denotes the absence of a documented finding (a true negative) rather than missing data. “Other rare conditions” includes fetal macrosomia, congenital malformations, triple nuchal cord, and other isolated cases. Categorical associations were assessed using Pearson’s chi-square test when all expected cell counts were ≥5; Fisher’s exact test for 2 × 2 tables with any expected count < 5; and a Monte Carlo exact test (10,000 resamples) for tables with three or more categories and any expected count < 5. Reported p-values are two-sided and unadjusted; false-discovery-rate control (Benjamini–Hochberg, applied within each sample type) is summarised separately (Section 2.4). Values p < 0.05 are shown in bold and were considered statistically significant.
Table 4. Multivariable logistic regression models for non-albicans Candida isolation, by sample type.
Table 4. Multivariable logistic regression models for non-albicans Candida isolation, by sample type.
PredictorReference/ScaleOR95% CIp-Value
Amniotic fluid (n = 242); outcome: non-albicans Candida (1) vs. C. albicans (0)
Maternal ageper 1-year increase1.071.02–1.120.003
Parityper 1-birth increase0.680.52–0.900.007
Gestational ageper 1-week increase0.960.91–1.010.121
Model performance: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.099; classification accuracy = 71.9%; sensitivity (non-albicans Candida) = 12.3%; specificity (C. albicans) = 97.6%; AUC = 0.65
Lochia (n = 827); outcome: non-albicans Candida (1) vs. C. albicans (0)
Maternal ageper 1-year increase1.051.03–1.08<0.001
Parityper 1-birth increase0.760.65–0.88<0.001
Model performance: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.045; classification accuracy = 65.8%; sensitivity (non-albicans Candida) = 3.3%; specificity (C. albicans) = 96.7%; AUC = 0.63
Vaginal discharge, pregnant stratum (n = 1627); outcome: non-albicans Candida (1) vs. C. albicans (0)
Maternal ageper 1-year increase1.051.03–1.06<0.001
Thyroid disorder, present vs absentReference: absent2.901.14–7.350.025
Gestational ageper 1-week increase0.990.98–1.000.062
Parityper 1-birth increase0.930.85–1.010.082
Model performance: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.038; classification accuracy = 61.3%; sensitivity (non-albicans Candida) = 11.6%; specificity (C. albicans) = 92.7%; AUC = 0.60
Vaginal discharge, non-pregnant stratum (n = 393); outcome: non-albicans Candida (1) vs. C. albicans (0)
Maternal ageper 1-year increase1.041.02–1.06<0.001
Parityper 1-birth increase1.020.33–3.100.974
Model performance: Nagelkerke R2 = 0.095; classification accuracy = 71.5%; sensitivity (non-albicans Candida) = 96.7%; specificity (C. albicans) = 14.2%; AUC = 0.68. In this stratum, maternal age was the only statistically significant independent predictor (parity was non-significant).
Notes: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. All models used non-albicans Candida as the outcome category coded as 1, with Candida albicans coded as 0. Continuous predictors were entered per one-unit increase. Binary predictors are shown as present versus absent unless otherwise specified. Polymicrobial co-isolations of C. albicans with a non-albicans species were assigned to the non-albicans Candida group. Odds ratios are reported with Wald-type 95% confidence intervals; sensitivity denotes correct classification of non-albicans Candida and specificity correct classification of C. albicans at a 0.5 probability threshold. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC represent apparent, in-sample performance estimates and were not internally validated; they should therefore be interpreted as descriptive measures of exploratory models rather than as validated predictive performance. Maternal BMI and other variables with extremely sparse categories were not entered into the models. All four models were statistically significant overall (omnibus likelihood-ratio test, p < 0.001). Estimates were recomputed from the 2024 isolate-level database of Candida-positive cultures (242 amniotic fluid, 827 lochial, and 2020 vaginal discharge cultures). Species-level descriptive analysis of the non-albicans group showed that Pichia kudriavzevii was the predominant named species in all three sample types, accounting for 19.0% of all amniotic fluid isolates, 26.58% of vaginal discharge isolates, and 21.3% of lochial isolates. Candida spp. isolates without definitive species-level identification accounted for 8.7%, 14.0%, and 9.7%, respectively, whereas Nakaseomyces glabratus accounted for 2.5%, 4.06%, and 2.1%. Candida parapsilosis was detected only in vaginal discharge cultures (0.05%).
Table 5. Distribution of non-albicans Candida species across sample types, n (% of Candida-positive isolates within each compartment).
Table 5. Distribution of non-albicans Candida species across sample types, n (% of Candida-positive isolates within each compartment).
SpeciesAmniotic Fluid (n = 242)Vaginal Discharge (n = 2020)Lochia (n = 827)
Pichia kudriavzevii46 (19.0)537 (26.6)177 (21.3)
Nakaseomyces glabratus6 (2.5)82 (4.1)17 (2.1)
Candida parapsilosis0 (—)1 (0.05)0 (—)
Candida spp. (genus-level)21 (8.7)282 (14.0)80 (9.7)
Total non-albicans Candida73 (30.2)902 (44.7)274 (33.1)
Notes: Data are n (%) of all Candida-positive isolates within each sample type; Candida albicans accounted for the remainder (69.8%, 55.35%, and 66.9%, respectively). Pichia kudriavzevii was the predominant non-albicans species in all three compartments. “Candida spp. (genus-level)” denotes isolates confirmed as Candida at the genus level without a species-level VITEK® identification. Dash (—), not detected. Percentages are rounded to one decimal. Co-isolations (n = 6) are counted under their non-albicans component.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ionescu, S.G.; Cosovanu, E.T.; Dimitriu, C.D.; Damian, C.; Costin, D.; Goriuc, A.; Porumb Andrese, E.; Socolov, D.G.; Grigore, M.; Iancu, L.S.; et al. Species Distribution of Candida Isolates in Amniotic Fluid, Vaginal Discharge, and Lochial Cultures in Obstetric and Gynecological Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Pathogens 2026, 15, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15080797

AMA Style

Ionescu SG, Cosovanu ET, Dimitriu CD, Damian C, Costin D, Goriuc A, Porumb Andrese E, Socolov DG, Grigore M, Iancu LS, et al. Species Distribution of Candida Isolates in Amniotic Fluid, Vaginal Discharge, and Lochial Cultures in Obstetric and Gynecological Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Pathogens. 2026; 15(8):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15080797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ionescu, Silvia Gabriela, Elena Teona Cosovanu, Cristina Daniela Dimitriu, Costin Damian, Diana Costin, Ancuta Goriuc, Elena Porumb Andrese, Demetra Gabriela Socolov, Mihaela Grigore, Luminita Smaranda Iancu, and et al. 2026. "Species Distribution of Candida Isolates in Amniotic Fluid, Vaginal Discharge, and Lochial Cultures in Obstetric and Gynecological Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study" Pathogens 15, no. 8: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15080797

APA Style

Ionescu, S. G., Cosovanu, E. T., Dimitriu, C. D., Damian, C., Costin, D., Goriuc, A., Porumb Andrese, E., Socolov, D. G., Grigore, M., Iancu, L. S., Caruntu, I. D., & Ursu, R. G. (2026). Species Distribution of Candida Isolates in Amniotic Fluid, Vaginal Discharge, and Lochial Cultures in Obstetric and Gynecological Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Pathogens, 15(8), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15080797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop