Next Article in Journal
An Overview of the Genetic Diversity and Epidemiological Potential of Yersinia pestis Populations in Natural Plague Foci of Kazakhstan
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Hepatitis E Virus Infection Among Pregnant Women in Tunisia: Findings from a Large Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Molecular Epidemiology of Helminths at the Wildlife–Livestock Interface in Kazakhstan: Evidence from Sheep and Saiga

by
Nurzhan Abekeshev
1,
Zhangeldi Ussenov
1,*,
Rinat Abdrakhmanov
1,
Zukhra Aitpayeva
1,*,
Marina Svotina
1,
Zhadyra Valiyeva
1,
Askhat Zhumabayev
1,
Albina Darmenova
1,
Ilana Abirova
1,
Zhadyra Ryskaliyeva
1,
Azamat Aitkaliyev
1,
Aigul Kaliyeva
2,*,
Anargul Berkaliyeva
2,
Rakhima Bissalyyeva
2,
Assylbek Zhanabayev
3 and
Gulmira Abulgazimova
3,*
1
Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Agrotechnology, Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University, Oral 090000, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Biology, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan
3
Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2026, 15(5), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050550
Submission received: 11 April 2026 / Revised: 4 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 20 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitic Pathogens)

Abstract

Helminth infections remain a major constraint to livestock productivity, particularly in regions where domestic animals and wildlife share grazing habitats. This study investigated the molecular diversity and transmission dynamics of helminth communities in sheep (Ovis aries) and saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) in West Kazakhstan. A total of 35 animals (20 sheep and 15 saiga) were examined, and helminths were identified using polymerase chain reaction targeting the ITS1 region of ribosomal DNA for nematodes and the mitochondrial cox1 gene for cestodes. Of the 20 analyzed samples, 80% were successfully identified at the molecular level. Detected species included Haemonchus contortus, Trichuris ovis, Chabertia ovina, Moniezia expansa, and Avitellina centripunctata. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Chabertia ovina isolates from both hosts clustered within a single monophyletic clade, indicating high genetic similarity and supporting potential cross-species transmission. Mitochondrial markers provided higher resolution for cestode differentiation, whereas ITS1 was effective for nematode identification. The predominance of Chabertia ovina in saiga suggests ecological adaptation and efficient transmission within wild populations. These findings highlight the epidemiological significance of shared grazing ecosystems and underscore the need for integrated parasite control strategies that consider both livestock and wildlife reservoirs.

1. Introduction

Helminth infections remain a major constraint to livestock productivity worldwide, particularly in extensive grazing systems where environmental exposure to infective stages is continuous. Gastrointestinal nematodes and cestodes such as Haemonchus contortus, Trichuris ovis, Chabertia ovina, and Moniezia expansa are among the most prevalent parasites affecting small ruminants, leading to reduced weight gain, decreased fertility, and, in severe cases, mortality. The global burden of helminth infections is further exacerbated by increasing anthelmintic resistance, which compromises the effectiveness of conventional control strategies [1,2].
In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward the role of wildlife in maintaining and disseminating parasitic infections. Wild ungulates can act as reservoirs of helminths, contributing to the persistence of infection in livestock through shared grazing habitats and environmental contamination. The wildlife–livestock interface has therefore emerged as a critical component of parasite epidemiology, particularly in open ecosystems where physical barriers between species are minimal [3,4]. In such systems, cross-species transmission may facilitate the circulation of genetically similar parasite populations, complicating disease control and surveillance efforts.
Central Asia, and particularly Kazakhstan, represents a unique ecological setting characterized by vast steppe landscapes, transhumant livestock production [5,6], and the presence of migratory wild ruminants such as the saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) [7]. Despite the ecological and economic importance of this region, molecular data on helminth diversity and transmission dynamics remain limited. Existing studies in this region rely on morphological identification, which is often insufficient for accurate species differentiation due to phenotypic similarity among closely related taxa and the presence of cryptic species [8,9,10,11]. Consequently, there is a need for molecular approaches to improve taxonomic resolution and support epidemiological investigations.
Molecular genetic tools, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing, have become essential for the accurate identification and phylogenetic characterization of helminths. Ribosomal markers such as the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of the nuclear rRNA gene are widely used for nematode identification due to their conserved and variable regions, which enable both broad detection and species-level resolution [1]. In contrast, mitochondrial genes such as cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) provide higher discriminatory power for closely related species, particularly among cestodes, due to their elevated mutation rates and maternal inheritance patterns [12]. The integration of these markers allows for robust molecular identification and improved understanding of parasite phylogeny.
Furthermore, molecular epidemiology has increasingly been applied to investigate transmission pathways and host associations. Phylogenetic analyses can reveal patterns of genetic similarity among parasite populations from different hosts, providing indirect evidence of cross-species transmission and shared infection sources [13]. Such approaches are particularly valuable in regions where livestock and wildlife coexist and interact extensively.
Given the limited molecular data on helminths in West Kazakhstan and the potential role of saiga antelope in parasite circulation, this study aimed to (i) identify helminth species infecting sheep and saiga using molecular genetic methods, (ii) analyze their phylogenetic relationships based on ITS1 and cox1 markers, and (iii) assess the potential for cross-species transmission within shared grazing ecosystems. The findings are expected to contribute to a better understanding of helminth epidemiology in the region and to support the development of evidence-based control strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Ethics

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board and Animal Ethics Committee of the Branch of Kazakh Scientific Research Veterinary Institute (Protocol #2).

2.2. Study Area and Sample Collection

The study was conducted in the West Kazakhstan region (51°38′–55°57′ N, 46°9′–46°4′ E), a major livestock-producing area characterized by extensive grazing systems and frequent interactions between domestic and wild ruminants [14]. A total of 35 animals, including 20 sheep (Ovis aries) and 15 saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica), were examined. These animals were not euthanized specifically for the purposes of this study. The sheep samples were obtained during routine slaughter under standard agricultural practices, while the saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) samples were collected opportunistically in collaboration with local veterinary and wildlife authorities. Information on age and sex was recorded where available and is summarized in Supplementary Table S1. The sheep belonged to local Kazakh breeds typical for the region. Samples were obtained from different anatomical sites, including the small intestine, abomasum, mesentery, liver, and large intestine, across animals of varying age and sex groups. Sampling locations included several districts (Karatobe, Kaztalov, Baiterek), representing a geographically diverse population. The taxonomic identification of the recovered parasites based on their morphological characteristics was carried out using established diagnostic guides and reference atlases [15,16]. Helminths were collected directly from host organs during necropsy, allowing recovery of intact specimens for subsequent morphological and molecular characterization. Individual parasites were carefully isolated and processed separately for downstream analyses. DNA extraction and PCR amplification were performed on single-specimen isolates rather than on fecal material, thereby eliminating the risk of cross-reactivity in cases of mixed infections.

2.3. DNA Manipulation and PCR Amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from helminth specimens using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and concentration were assessed prior to downstream applications.
Molecular identification was performed according to the protocol described by Deplazes, van Knapen [17]. In brief, for nematodes, the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region of the 18S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer NC13/NC2, the forward primer 5′-ATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3′, and the reverse primer 5′-TTAGTTTCTTTTCCTCCGCT-3′. For cestodes, a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene was amplified using the primer JB3/JB4.5, the forward primer 5′-TTTTTTGGGCATCCTGAGGTTTAT-3′, and the reverse primer 5′-TAAAGAAAGAACATAATGAAAATG-3′. Each reaction contained 10 pmol of each primer and approximately 100 ng/µL of template DNA.
PCR amplification was performed in a total reaction volume of 25 μL, containing 12.5 μL of 2× PCR master mix (including Taq DNA polymerase, reaction buffer, MgCl2, and dNTPs), 0.5 μL of each primer (10 pmol), 1 μL of template DNA, and nuclease-free water to volume. The conditions for DNA amplification were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel using 1× TAE buffer. Visualization was performed under UV illumination. Each PCR run included both positive and negative controls. Positive controls consisted of previously confirmed helminth DNA samples, while negative controls contained nuclease-free water.

2.4. DNA Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

Amplified products were purified and sequenced according to the method published by Bowles, Blair [18] using BigDye Terminator chemistry on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Raw sequences were edited and assembled using BioEdit v7.0.
Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using nucleotide sequences of ITS1 and cox1 genes. Sequences obtained in this study were aligned with reference sequences retrieved from GenBank. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using standard algorithms (Neighbor-Joining or Maximum Likelihood), and node support was evaluated using bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates).

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Identification of Helminths

Helminth infections were detected in 20 out of 35 examined animals (57.1%). Among host species, 7 of 20 sheep (35.0%) and 13 of 15 saiga antelope (86.7%) were positive for helminths. Of the 20 helminth-positive samples, 16 (80.0%) were successfully amplified and identified by molecular methods, while 4 samples (20.0%) failed to yield usable sequences, likely due to DNA degradation or insufficient template quality. Molecular analysis revealed the presence of both nematodes and cestodes in sheep and saiga populations. The identified species included Moniezia expansa, Avitellina centripunctata, Haemonchus contortus, Trichuris ovis, and Chabertia ovina. PCR amplification and sequencing confirmed the taxonomic identity of the recovered helminths. The obtained nucleotide sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank (Supplementary Table S2). Specifically, ITS1 sequences of nematodes (Haemonchus contortus, Trichuris ovis, Chabertia ovina) were assigned accession numbers (PZ309116, PZ309117, PZ309118, PZ309119, PZ309120, PZ309121, PZ309122, PZ309123, PZ309124, PZ309125, PZ309126, PZ309127), while mitochondrial cox1 sequences of cestodes (Moniezia expansa, Avitellina centripunctata) were deposited under accession numbers (PZ309129, PZ309130, PZ309131).
These findings demonstrate a diverse helminth community circulating among domestic and wild ruminants. In sheep, infections were primarily associated with Moniezia expansa (2/20), Haemonchus contortus (2/20), Trichuris ovis (1/20), and Chabertia ovina (1/20), with localization mainly in the small intestine and abomasum. In saiga antelope, Chabertia ovina was the most frequently detected species, identified in (9/20) samples (45%), while Avitellina centripunctata was identified in a single case. The high prevalence of Chabertia ovina in saiga samples (90%) suggests potential adaptation or efficient transmission within wild populations.

3.2. Phylogeny

Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS1 sequences demonstrated that isolates of Chabertia ovina from sheep and saiga clustered within a single monophyletic clade together with reference sequences from GenBank (EU086374, EU086375, PQ394620), with strong bootstrap support (~90%). The absence of host-specific clustering indicates a high degree of genetic similarity and suggests possible cross-species transmission. Similarly, Haemonchus contortus isolates formed a well-supported clade (~89%), confirming accurate species identification. Trichuris ovis sequences formed a distinct and more divergent lineage, reflecting their taxonomic separation from Strongylida nematodes (Figure 1).
Phylogenetic analysis using the mitochondrial cox1 gene revealed clear separation between cestode species (Figure 2). Avitellina centripunctata isolates clustered with reference sequences, forming a monophyletic clade with moderate bootstrap support (75%), indicating intra-species variability. Moniezia expansa isolates formed a distinct, well-supported clade (81%), confirming species identity and demonstrating the higher resolution of mitochondrial markers compared to ribosomal genes. The clustering of Chabertia ovina isolates from both sheep and saiga within a single genetic lineage suggests active circulation of this parasite between domestic and wild hosts. This finding highlights the epidemiological significance of shared grazing ecosystems and supports the hypothesis of interspecies transmission.

3.3. Morphological Characterization of Recovered Helminths

Macroscopic and microscopic examination of the recovered helminths revealed morphological features consistent with established diagnostic criteria (Figure 3). Adult cestodes exhibited a typical segmented strobila composed of distinct proglottids, with elongated ribbon-like bodies readily visible to the naked eye. In some specimens, larval cestode stages were observed within host tissues as rounded, translucent cyst-like structures.

4. Discussion

This study provides molecular evidence of a diverse helminth community circulating among domestic sheep (Ovis aries) and saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) in West Kazakhstan. The identification of key gastrointestinal nematodes (Haemonchus contortus, Trichuris ovis, Chabertia ovina) and cestodes (Moniezia expansa, Avitellina centripunctata) highlights the complexity of parasite assemblages in mixed grazing ecosystems. Similar patterns of high parasite diversity in extensive grazing systems have been reported globally, where environmental contamination and host overlap facilitate transmission [19]. The predominance of Chabertia ovina in saiga populations suggests ecological adaptation and efficient transmission under steppe conditions. Comparable findings have been described in wild ungulates, where gastrointestinal nematodes persist due to continuous exposure and lack of intervention [20,21].
Sequence analysis of the amplified ITS1 and cox1 regions revealed a high degree of similarity with corresponding reference sequences available in GenBank (EU086374, EU086375, PQ394620). Minor nucleotide variations were observed among isolates; however, these differences did not affect species-level identification and did not result in the formation of distinct phylogenetic clusters. No unique or diagnostic mutations indicative of novel lineages were detected within the analyzed dataset. The combined use of ITS1 (18S rRNA) and mitochondrial cox1 markers enabled reliable species-level identification with an overall success rate of 80%. ITS1 proved effective for nematode identification, although its limited phylogenetic resolution for deeper divergence is consistent with previous studies [12]. In contrast, the mitochondrial cox1 gene demonstrated superior discriminatory power, allowing clear differentiation among cestode species. This aligns with growing evidence that mitochondrial markers provide higher resolution due to increased mutation rates and reduced conservation [12].
A key finding of this study is the absence of host-specific clustering in Chabertia ovina, with isolates from sheep and saiga forming a single monophyletic clade. This strongly supports active cross-species transmission. Such transmission dynamics are widely documented in systems where wildlife and livestock share grazing areas. For example, studies have shown that wild ungulates act as reservoirs, maintaining parasite populations and facilitating spillover into domestic herds [22,23]. The ecological context of West Kazakhstan, characterized by open steppe landscapes and overlapping grazing, further supports this mechanism [14,24,25]. This implies the likelihood of cross-transmission of parasites between different host species. Similar epidemiological patterns have been reported in Central Asian and African pastoral systems [11,26]. The circulation of helminths between sheep and saiga has important implications for animal health and productivity. Haemonchus contortus, in particular, is one of the most pathogenic nematodes in small ruminants, causing anemia and production losses [27]. Shared parasite populations may also contribute to the persistence of infection despite control measures [28] and increase the risk of anthelmintic resistance, a growing global concern [29]. These findings highlight the necessity of integrated parasite management strategies that incorporate both livestock and wildlife reservoirs.
An additional contextual factor relevant to the interpretation of our findings is the use of anthelmintic treatments in the region. Although detailed farm-level treatment records specific to West Kazakhstan remain limited, studies from Kazakhstan indicate the use of broad-spectrum antiparasitic formulations in sheep, including albendazole- and ivermectin-based regimens [4]. In addition, studies conducted in West Kazakhstan have evaluated albendazole-based treatment approaches in saiga antelope, confirming the regional relevance of anthelmintic interventions in wild populations [30]. Recent investigations have also documented substantial overlap in helminth fauna between saiga and sheep in western Kazakhstan, supporting the existence of a shared parasite pool at the wildlife–livestock interface [7].
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the sample size was relatively small (n = 35), which limits the statistical power and generalizability of the results. Consequently, formal statistical analyses comparing infection prevalence between host species or regions were not performed, as the sample size and uneven distribution of identified specimens would not support robust inferential testing. Second, sampling was conducted at a single time point, precluding assessment of seasonal dynamics in helminth transmission. Third, molecular identification was successful in 80% of samples, potentially introducing bias due to incomplete amplification or sequencing failures. Additionally, the molecular analysis was based on single genetic markers (ITS1 and cox1), which are suitable for species identification but provide limited resolution for assessing broader genetic diversity. Consequently, additional sources of variation present in other genomic regions may not be captured. Finally, ecological drivers of transmission, such as grazing overlap and environmental contamination, were not quantitatively assessed.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates a diverse helminth community shared between sheep and saiga in West Kazakhstan, emphasizing the epidemiological importance of the wildlife–livestock interface. The lack of host-specific clustering, particularly for Chabertia ovina, supports ongoing cross-species transmission within shared grazing systems. The combined use of ITS1 and cox1 markers enabled reliable molecular identification. These findings highlight the need for integrated parasite control strategies that incorporate wildlife reservoirs. Future longitudinal and genomic studies are required to better resolve transmission dynamics and inform sustainable control measures.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens15050550/s1, Table S1: Helminths detected in sheep and saiga of different sex and age groups in the West Kazakhstan region; Table S2: Nucleotide sequences and NCBI GenBank accession numbers of the studied helminth species; Figure S1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products targeting the ribosomal ITS1 region (NC13/NC2 primers) in nematode samples and the mitochondrial cox1 gene in cestode samples.

Author Contributions

Z.U., Z.A., A.K., and G.A.: supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; N.A., R.A., M.S., and Z.R.: formal analysis; Z.V., A.Z. (Askhat Zhumabayev), A.D., I.A., A.A., A.B., R.B., and A.Z. (Assylbek Zhanabayev): visualization, validation, resources, conceptualization, methodology, investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan under grant number AP26198215.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Animal Ethics Committee of the Branch of Kazakh Scientific Research Veterinary Institute (Protocol #2), approved on 17 October 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed oral consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Halvarsson, P.; Baltrušis, P.; Kjellander, P.; Höglund, J. Parasitic strongyle nemabiome communities in wild ruminants in Sweden. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vercruysse, J.; Charlier, J.; Van Dijk, J.; Morgan, E.R.; Geary, T.; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.; Claerebout, E. Control of helminth ruminant infections by 2030. Parasitology 2018, 145, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Babayani, N.D.; Rose Vineer, H.; Walker, J.G.; Davidson, R.K. Editorial: Climate and Parasite Transmission at the Livestock-Wildlife Interface. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 8, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Akhmetzhanova, A.; Duyssembaev, S.; Zhanat, N.; Koigeldinova, A.; Tussupov, S. Strongyloides and Eimeria Infection and Its Treatment Way in Sheep. Arch. Razi Inst. 2022, 77, 2359–2363. [Google Scholar]
  5. Seisenov, B.; Duimbayev, D.; Kazhgaliyev, N.; Abdrakhmanov, T.; Tegza, A.; Abeldinov, R.; Burambayeva, N.; Temirzhanova, A.; Tegza, I.; Kemeshev, Z.; et al. In Vitro Fertilization in Kazakh Whiteheaded Cattle: A Comparative Study. Life 2023, 13, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kulpiisova, A.; Yessengaliyev, K.; Kassimova, G.; Kozhakhmetova, A.; Kadraliyeva, B.; Rustem, A.; Temirzhanova, A.; Burambayeva, N.; Chylbak-Ool, S.; Pakhomova, E.; et al. Utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Breeding Auliekol Cattle: A Comparative Study. Life 2024, 14, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kushaliyev, K.; Ussenov, Z.; Alimbekov, S.; Millakaev, O.; Kozhayeva, A.; Khairushev, A. Study of the saiga helminth fauna and Ural sheep in the western region of Kazakhstan. Open Vet. J. 2023, 13, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdybekova, A.M.; Torgerson, P.R. Frequency distributions of helminths of wolves in Kazakhstan. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 184, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uakhit, R.; Smagulova, A.; Lider, L.; Leontyev, S.; Kiyan, V. Epizootiological monitoring of wolf helminths in Northern and Central Kazakhstan. Vet. World 2024, 17, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhanabayev, A.; Ibrayev, B.; Lider, L.; Ussenbayev, A.; Bissengaliyev, R. Epizootic situation on horse helminthiases in the northern region of Kazakhstan. Vet. Ital. 2023, 59, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhanabayev, A.A.; Nurgalie, B.Y.; Kereyev, A.K.; Paritova, A.Y.; Ussenbayev, A.Y.; Bayantassova, S.M.; Seitkamzina, D.; Zhumagaliyeva, G.K.; Yelemessova, B. Parasite Fauna and Infection of Sheep with Parasitosis; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan, A.H.E.; Chaisiri, K.; Saralamba, S.; Morand, S.; Thaenkham, U. Assessing the suitability of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genetic markers for molecular systematics and species identification of helminths. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Redman, E.; Queiroz, C.; Bartley, D.J.; Levy, M.; Avramenko, R.W.; Gilleard, J.S. Validation of ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome sequencing for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes and its application to a large scale survey of UK sheep farms. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 275, 108933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ginayatov, N.; Aitpayeva, Z.; Zhubantayev, I.; Kassymbekova, L.; Zhanabayev, A.; Abulgazimova, G.; Arynova, R.; Bizhanov, A.; Mussayeva, A.; Berdikulov, M.; et al. Smallholder Cattle Farmers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Rabies: A Regional Survey in Kazakhstan. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peters, W.; Pasvol, G. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology; Mosby: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nabarro, L.; Morris-Jones, S.; Moore, D. Peters’ Atlas of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology E-Book; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Deplazes, P.; van Knapen, F.; Schweiger, A.; Overgaauw, P.A.M. Role of pet dogs and cats in the transmission of helminthic zoonoses in Europe, with a focus on echinococcosis and toxocarosis. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 182, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bowles, J.; Blair, D.; McManus, D.P. Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1992, 54, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mavrot, F.; Hertzberg, H.; Torgerson, P. Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shen, D.-D.; Wang, J.-F.; Zhang, D.-Y.; Peng, Z.-W.; Yang, T.-Y.; Wang, Z.-D.; Bowman, D.D.; Hou, Z.-J.; Liu, Z.-S. Genetic diversity of Haemonchus contortus isolated from sympatric wild blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur) and sheep in Helan Mountains, China. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Omeragić, J.; Kapo, N.; Škapur, V.; Softić, A.; Goletić, Š.; Šaljić, E.; Goletić, T. Parasites in Wildlife in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Maced. Vet. Rev. 2024, 47, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Morgan, E.R.; Lundervold, M.; Medley, G.F.; Shaikenov, B.S.; Torgerson, P.R.; Milner-Gulland, E.J. Assessing risks of disease transmission between wildlife and livestock: The Saiga antelope as a case study. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 131, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Urazayeva, S.T.; Kurmangaliyeva, S.S.; Kaliyev, A.A.; Tussupkaliyeva, K.S.; Issimov, A.; Urazayeva, A.B.; Tashimova, Z.K.; Mussin, N.M.; Begalin, T.; Amanshiyeva, A.A.; et al. Attitude toward vaccination against COVID-19 and acceptance of the national “QazVac” vaccine in the Aktobe city population, West Kazakhstan: A cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0303854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kutumbetov, L.; Ragatova, A.; Azanbekova, M.; Myrzakhmetova, B.; Aldayarov, N.; Zhugunissov, K.; Abduraimov, Y.; Nissanova, R.; Sarzhigitova, A.; Kemalova, N.; et al. Investigation of the Pathogenesis of Lumpy Skin Disease Virus in Indigenous Cattle in Kazakhstan. Pathogens 2025, 14, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tursunkulov, S.; Zakirova, F.; Moldakhmetova, Z.; Tegza, A.; Sayakova, Z.; Abekeshev, N.; Bizhanov, A.; Mussayeva, A.; Kanatbayev, S.; Admanova, G.; et al. Brucellosis in Kazakhstan: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Smallholder Farmers and Veterinary Specialists. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ola-Fadunsin, S.D.; Ganiyu, I.A.; Rabiu, M.; Hussain, K.; Sanda, I.M.; Baba, A.Y.; Furo, N.A.; Balogun, R.B. Helminth infections of great concern among cattle in Nigeria: Insight to its prevalence, species diversity, patterns of infections and risk factors. Vet. World 2020, 13, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaplan, R.M. Biology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Livestock. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kulpiisova, A.; Dikhanbayeva, F.; Tegza, A.; Tegza, I.; Abzhanova, S.; Moldakhmetova, Z.; Uazhanova, R.; Alikhanov, K.; Yerzhigitov, Y.; Shambulova, G.; et al. Assessment of food safety awareness and hygiene practices among food handlers in Almaty, Kazakhstan. BMC Public Health 2025, 25, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vineer, H.R.; Morgan, E.R.; Hertzberg, H.; Bartley, D.J.; Bosco, A.; Charlier, J.; Chartier, C.; Claerebout, E.; de Waal, T.; Hendrickx, G.; et al. Increasing importance of anthelmintic resistance in European livestock: Creation and meta-analysis of an open database. Parasite 2020, 27, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Karmaliev, R.; Arkhipov, I.; Sidikhov, B.; Usenov, Z.; Ertleuova, B.; Gabdullin, D. Helminth Contamination of Wild Ruminants in the West Kazakhstan Region and Activity of the Supramolecular Complex of Albendazole with Polyvinylpyrrolidone at Helminthoses. Russ. J. Parasitol. 2020, 14, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the ITS1 region of ribosomal DNA, illustrating the relationships among nematodes isolated from Ovis aries and Saiga tatarica. The tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. Bootstrap values (%) are indicated at the nodes and were calculated based on 1000 replicates. Only nodes with bootstrap support ≥75% are shown, while nodes with lower support values were collapsed to improve clarity and the reliability of phylogenetic interpretation. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Ascaris suum was used as an outgroup to root the tree.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the ITS1 region of ribosomal DNA, illustrating the relationships among nematodes isolated from Ovis aries and Saiga tatarica. The tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. Bootstrap values (%) are indicated at the nodes and were calculated based on 1000 replicates. Only nodes with bootstrap support ≥75% are shown, while nodes with lower support values were collapsed to improve clarity and the reliability of phylogenetic interpretation. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Ascaris suum was used as an outgroup to root the tree.
Pathogens 15 00550 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cox1 gene, illustrating the relationships between the cestodes Avitellina centripunctata and Moniezia expansa. The tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. Bootstrap values (%) are indicated at the nodes and were calculated based on 1000 replicates. For clarity, only nodes with bootstrap support ≥75% are shown, while branches with lower support were collapsed. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Taenia hydatigena was used as an outgroup to root the tree.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cox1 gene, illustrating the relationships between the cestodes Avitellina centripunctata and Moniezia expansa. The tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method. Bootstrap values (%) are indicated at the nodes and were calculated based on 1000 replicates. For clarity, only nodes with bootstrap support ≥75% are shown, while branches with lower support were collapsed. The scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Taenia hydatigena was used as an outgroup to root the tree.
Pathogens 15 00550 g002
Figure 3. Representative morphological features of helminths recovered from sheep (Ovis aries) and saiga (Saiga tatarica) in West Kazakhstan. (A) Adult cestode specimen showing segmented strobila (proglottids) with scale reference; (B) cestode fragments demonstrating characteristic segmentation; (C) larval cestode stage observed within host tissue; (D) macroscopic tissue lesion associated with parasitic infection; (EH) strongylid nematodes under light microscopy, displaying typical elongated cylindrical morphology, including coiled (F) and extended (H) forms, as well as body structure (G). All morphological features are consistent with standard taxonomic descriptions and support molecular identification results.
Figure 3. Representative morphological features of helminths recovered from sheep (Ovis aries) and saiga (Saiga tatarica) in West Kazakhstan. (A) Adult cestode specimen showing segmented strobila (proglottids) with scale reference; (B) cestode fragments demonstrating characteristic segmentation; (C) larval cestode stage observed within host tissue; (D) macroscopic tissue lesion associated with parasitic infection; (EH) strongylid nematodes under light microscopy, displaying typical elongated cylindrical morphology, including coiled (F) and extended (H) forms, as well as body structure (G). All morphological features are consistent with standard taxonomic descriptions and support molecular identification results.
Pathogens 15 00550 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abekeshev, N.; Ussenov, Z.; Abdrakhmanov, R.; Aitpayeva, Z.; Svotina, M.; Valiyeva, Z.; Zhumabayev, A.; Darmenova, A.; Abirova, I.; Ryskaliyeva, Z.; et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Helminths at the Wildlife–Livestock Interface in Kazakhstan: Evidence from Sheep and Saiga. Pathogens 2026, 15, 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050550

AMA Style

Abekeshev N, Ussenov Z, Abdrakhmanov R, Aitpayeva Z, Svotina M, Valiyeva Z, Zhumabayev A, Darmenova A, Abirova I, Ryskaliyeva Z, et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Helminths at the Wildlife–Livestock Interface in Kazakhstan: Evidence from Sheep and Saiga. Pathogens. 2026; 15(5):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abekeshev, Nurzhan, Zhangeldi Ussenov, Rinat Abdrakhmanov, Zukhra Aitpayeva, Marina Svotina, Zhadyra Valiyeva, Askhat Zhumabayev, Albina Darmenova, Ilana Abirova, Zhadyra Ryskaliyeva, and et al. 2026. "Molecular Epidemiology of Helminths at the Wildlife–Livestock Interface in Kazakhstan: Evidence from Sheep and Saiga" Pathogens 15, no. 5: 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050550

APA Style

Abekeshev, N., Ussenov, Z., Abdrakhmanov, R., Aitpayeva, Z., Svotina, M., Valiyeva, Z., Zhumabayev, A., Darmenova, A., Abirova, I., Ryskaliyeva, Z., Aitkaliyev, A., Kaliyeva, A., Berkaliyeva, A., Bissalyyeva, R., Zhanabayev, A., & Abulgazimova, G. (2026). Molecular Epidemiology of Helminths at the Wildlife–Livestock Interface in Kazakhstan: Evidence from Sheep and Saiga. Pathogens, 15(5), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop