Next Article in Journal
Novel Thiazolylimidazole Hybrids as Promising Antileishmanial Agents: Rational Design and Biological Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Paleopathology Meets Public Health: Deep-Time Syndemics and the Ecology of Emerging Infections
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype Ia ST7 CC1 in Farmed Nile Tilapia in Latin America: Age-Dependent Disease Expression and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of an Emerging Clonal Lineage

by
Marco Rozas-Serri
1,*,
Miguel Fernandez-Alarcon
1,
Mariene Miyoko-Natori
1,
Renata Galetti
1,
Ricardo Harakava
2,
Mateus Cardoso-Guimarães
1 and
Ricardo Ildefonso
1
1
Pathovet Labs, Ribeirão Preto 14025-060, Brazil
2
Instituto Biológico/IB, São Paulo 04016-035, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2026, 15(5), 545; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050545 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 April 2026 / Revised: 12 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Emerging Pathogens)

Abstract

Recently, a strain of Streptococcus agalactiae serotype Ia sequence type 7 clonal complex 1 (SaIa ST7 CC1) has emerged in Latin American tilapia aquaculture as an international threat. This study evaluated outbreaks of acute streptococcosis occurring between 2021 and 2025 on commercial Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farms in six Latin American countries, aiming to integrate molecular, clinical, pathological, and environmental data. In total, 360 moribund or recently dead fish at various production stages (larvae/fry, pre-grow-out, and grow-out) were examined, and 25 S. agalactiae isolates were serotyped and subjected to real-time PCR analysis, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), virulence and antimicrobial resistance gene profiling, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. All isolates belonged to SaIa and shared the same ST7 CC1 MLST profile, forming a highly homogeneous cluster with reference SaIa ST7 CC1 strains previously isolated from tilapia farms in Asia. These results are consistent with the regional spread of a single clonal line. At the larval and fry stages, SaIa ST7 CC1 was associated with hyperacute septicemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and frequent intestinal intussusception, whereas in pre-grow-out and grow-out fish, neurological signs were more prominent, followed by ocular signs, systemic hemorrhages, and coelomic lesions. Histopathological examination showed profuse colonization of the brain, spleen, liver, and intestine by Gram-positive cocci, accompanied by marked acute circulatory and inflammatory lesions and few chronic granulomatous responses, consistent with a rapidly progressing, highly aggressive infectious process. All outbreaks occurred during extended periods of warm water (>32 °C), with large day–night thermal gradients and reduced dissolved oxygen, suggesting that thermal stress may exacerbate disease expression in affected systems. All SaIa ST7 CC1 strains exhibited phenotypic susceptibility to florfenicol and amoxicillin, whereas 84% (21/25) and 100% (25/25) exhibited intermediate susceptibility to oxytetracycline and enrofloxacin, respectively. In total, 5 of the 21 isolates (23.8%) with intermediate susceptibility to oxytetracycline carried tetracycline resistance genes (tetM, tetO). These findings identify SaIa ST7 CC1 as a clinically significant emerging threat associated with thermally facilitated and geographically expanding streptococcosis in tilapia production in Latin America. Immediate priorities include screening imported broodstock using MLST or whole-genome sequencing (WGS), harmonized regional molecular surveillance, climate-adaptive farm management practices, prudent antimicrobial use, and serotype-matched vaccination and breeding strategies that improve both disease and heat resilience.

1. Introduction

Global farmed tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) production reached approximately 7 million metric tons in 2024, representing an annual increase of about 4–5% relative to 2023 [1] and an estimated market value of around USD 15–15.5 billion, with forecasts projecting growth to USD 21 billion by the year 2035 at a compound annual growth rate close to 3.1%, according to specialized market analyses [2]. Although North America (NAM), Central America (CAM), and South America (SAM) each produce approximately 900,000 metric tons of tilapia annually (about 13% of global production), together they constitute the backbone of the tilapia industry in Latin America (LAM) [3].
This continuous growth is primarily attributable to the species’ high adaptability to diverse environmental conditions and rapid growth, which have enabled its widespread adoption in multiple production systems and climatic zones [4]. Nevertheless, production intensification has occurred without risk-based internal and external biosecurity plans and amid heterogeneous farming practices among LAM-producing countries. This has occurred within the context of increasing environmental variability associated with climate change, which predisposes the sector to the emergence, re-emergence, and/or recurrent outbreaks of bacterial and viral disease with substantial productive, economic, and social impacts.
Over the past two decades, another factor has taken center stage as a key driver redefining host–pathogen–environment interactions for aquaculture and other food production systems: global warming [5,6]. Increasing water temperatures stimulate pathogen replication, virulence, life-cycle dynamics, and disease transmission in fish, while undermining biosecurity measures that were usually developed under less extreme climatic conditions. Tilapia, often characterized as tolerant of environmental variation and even climate change [4,7], are now increasingly exposed to both elevated and fluctuating temperatures, reduced dissolved oxygen (DO) levels, and altered pH and salinity associated with changing precipitation patterns and extreme weather events [8,9,10].
In this context, experimental and field data show that Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus, GBS), the etiological agent of piscine streptococcosis in tilapia, comprises 10 serotypes (Ia, Ib, II–IX) classified according to capsular polysaccharide antigens (cps) [11], which exhibit marked virulence variation driven by temperature changes [12,13]. In Papua, Negara Bagian Papua (Indonesia), strains that were CAMP-test negative (cfb-deficient) in 2013 became CAMP-test positive by 2023, suggesting adaptive shifts in virulence traits under warmer conditions [14]. Concurrently, temperature-induced decreases in oxygen solubility also result in substantially lower dissolved oxygen concentrations at higher temperatures (e.g., 32 °C vs. 22 °C) and, together with changes to salinity and pH, escalate physiological stress and impair disease resistance [9,10,15,16]. Sustained high water temperatures weaken teleost immunity via oxidative stress and impaired antigen presentation [17], enhance bacterial virulence through upregulated adhesins and toxins [18], and accelerate horizontal gene transfer and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture microbiomes [19].
Over the past five years, the epidemiology of S. agalactiae in farmed Nile tilapia across LAM has shifted dynamically [20,21]. Historically, the disease burden has been attributed primarily to S. agalactiae serotype Ib (SaIb), including several distinct sequence types (ST 103, ST 260, ST 261, ST 552, ST 553, and ST 927) [22]. However, since 2021, S. agalactiae serotype Ia (SaIa), sequence type 7 (ST7), clonal complex 1 (CC1), has spread across several LAM tilapia-producing countries [20,21,23]. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that this lineage originated from a close ancestor of isolates identified in tilapia farms in Asian countries [20]. Comparative studies from Asia have demonstrated that β-hemolytic strains, including SaIa and S. agalactiae serotype III (SaIII), are more pathogenic in farmed tilapia than non-hemolytic variants such as SaIb [24,25,26,27,28,29].
Given these circumstances, the objective of this study was to describe and characterize the SaIa ST7 CC1 strain associated with outbreaks of acute streptococcosis in commercially farmed Nile tilapia across six Latin American countries. Specifically, we (i) elucidated the clinical and pathological manifestations of disease across different production stages: larvae/fry (FRY), pre-grow-out (PGO), and grow-out (GO); (ii) identified serotype, sequence type, and phylogenetic relationships among isolates using real-time PCR assays and multilocus sequence typing (MLST); and (iii) profiled key virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes and assessed antimicrobial susceptibility to therapeutics commonly used in regional tilapia aquaculture. This work contributes to the understanding of the molecular epidemiology and pathogenesis of SaIa ST7 CC1 by integrating clinical, pathological, and environmental data and provides a framework for developing climate-adapted surveillance, prevention, and control strategies for streptococcosis in tilapia production systems in Latin America.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

Pathovet Labs is accredited by the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) of the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (MCTI) and maintains its own Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Animals (CEUA), established in accordance with Brazilian federal legislation and CONCEA/MCTI Resolution No. 50/2021. This study was conducted entirely under field conditions on commercial Nile tilapia farms during active streptococcosis outbreaks. Sampling, clinical examination, euthanasia, and transport procedures strictly adhered to institutional standard operating procedures for field disease investigation and diagnostic sampling.
At the time of study design and implementation, the research team did not consider prior ethics committee approval necessary, as this study involved no experimental manipulation beyond routine diagnostic procedures, and all fish were handled under standard commercial farming conditions. These criteria align with those outlined by Bennett et al. [30], who recognized that field collection and diagnostic studies conducted under commercial conditions are frequently exempt from formal Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) review, as they fall outside the scope of procedures typically regulated by such bodies. However, this study was subsequently reviewed by the CEUA-Pathovet Labs Ethics Committee in March 2026, which confirmed that the procedures had been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards applicable to field studies in farmed fish (Protocol No. 04/2026).
Fish were euthanized by immersion in buffered tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) at 300–400 mg/L for at least 20 min after cessation of opercular movements, in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals and institutional animal care protocols. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.

2.2. Field Fish Sampling

Between 2021 and 2025, acute outbreaks of a presumed bacterial systemic disease occurred in different production stages of commercial Nile tilapia, including FRY (~0.5 to 5 g), PGO (~5 to 80 g), GO (~100 g to harvest), on farms located in six countries (C1–C6) in North America (NAM), Central America (CAM), and South America (SAM) (Table 1). Accordingly, this study included only commercially farmed tilapia, and no animals were maintained under experimental conditions.
All sampled farms operated semi-intensive production systems with variable stocking densities according to production stage: 0.2–2.0 kg/m3 in FRY, 3.0–5.0 kg/m3 in PGO, and 10–20 kg/m3 in GO. Farms in the FRY phase used earthen ponds, fiberglass or geomembrane tanks (PVC/HDPE), or concrete tanks supplied with water from rivers, lakes, reservoirs, or groundwater sources (C1, C3, C5). The PGO and GO phases involved either net-cage systems in rivers, lakes, or reservoirs (C2, C4, C6) or earthen ponds fed by river diversions (C1, C3, C4, C5).
A total of 360 moribund or recently dead specimens (FRY, n = 180; PGO/GO, n = 180) were intentionally sampled across six countries (C1–C6) (Table 1), with one commercial farm selected per country through the collaborative network. All fish underwent anatomopathological examination, and 92 specimens were selected for histopathological characterization (Table 1). Of the total isolates obtained, 25 were selected for further study due to logistical and budgetary constraints (Table 1): 5 isolates each from C1, C2, C4, and C6; 3 isolates from C3; and 2 isolates from C5.
Water temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO) were recorded twice daily (06:00 h and 14:00 h) throughout the outbreak period using a calibrated multiparameter probe (YSI Pro20, YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Across all six farms, sustained periods of 3–4 weeks with average water temperatures >32 °C (peaks of 34 °C) and large day–night thermal gradients (ΔT > 5 °C) were recorded during the outbreaks. Nighttime DO concentrations ranged from 1.0 to 1.8 mg/L (20–25% saturation), whereas daytime values ranged from 5.5 to 6.5 mg/L (70–80% saturation). No statistically significant differences were observed among farms or countries for any environmental indicator (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test; p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

2.3. Clinical Signs and Gross Pathology

Moribund and recently dead specimens were selected through intentional sampling from six (06) commercial farms in each participating country. Prior to necropsy, behavioral changes, clinical symptoms, and external macroscopic lesions were recorded for all sampled fish. External examination included systematic evaluation of the skin, scales, fins (including pectoral fin insertion sites), eyes, nasal cavities, oral and oropharyngeal cavities, anus, and gills according to standardized ichthyopathological protocols.
Following surface disinfection with 70% ethanol, fish were systematically necropsied using sterilized instruments. The abdominal cavity of each specimen was opened aseptically to expose the internal organs and allow gross anatomopathological examination. Examined organs included the liver, spleen, kidneys, pericardial cavity, heart, digestive tract, gills, and gonads. The skull was carefully opened to expose the cranial cavity and brain. Finally, tissue samples were collected from multiple target organs selected according to the suspected systemic bacterial pathology and standardized diagnostic guidelines.

2.4. Bacteriological Culture and Serotyping

Primary bacteriological procedures were conducted in situ in laboratories available at each farm and consisted of aseptic inoculation of tissue samples from the organs listed in Table 1 onto 5% sheep blood agar (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA), followed by incubation at 28 °C for 24 to 48 h. Colonies suspected to be S. agalactiae (e.g., gray-white, flat, and mucoid) were confirmed as Gram-positive cocci or chains of cocci by Gram staining and subsequently subcultured on Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Heel do Brasil Biomedica Ltd., São José dos Pinhais, PR, Brazil). The same 25 isolates were subsequently used for molecular and phenotypic characterization.
Subsequently, the 25 isolates were serotyped using a commercial latex agglutination kit for GBS types Ia, Ib, and III (SaIII) (ImmuLex™, SSI Diagnostica S/A, Copenhagen, Denmark) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 10 μL of each kit reagent was added to a single GBS colony suspended in 10 μL of saline solution. Reactions were considered positive when agglutination was observed within 30 s. All isolates positive for Streptococcus serotype Ia were selected for further analysis.

2.5. Histopathological Examination

Tissue samples ~0.5–1 cm3 in volume (n = 92) were collected from the brain, heart, hepatopancreas, mid-kidney, spleen, stomach, and intestines of each fish. Samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (1:10 v/v sample-to-fixative ratio) for 24 h at room temperature and then transferred to 70% ethanol for long-term preservation. Following fixation, samples were dehydrated through a graded alcohol series and processed according to standard histological protocols. Sections 4 μm thick were cut from each tissue block and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Gram stain for microscopic examination. All areas of each stained organ section were examined using a Leica DM-2000 optical microscope (Leica, Hamburg, Germany) at low (40–100×) and high (400×) magnification. Images were captured using a Leica DFC-295 digital camera (Leica, Hamburg, Germany) and analyzed using the Leica Application Suite Software (LAS X 5.3.1), Image Analysis (Leica, Hamburg, Germany).

2.6. Real-Time PCR-Based Serotyping

Genomic DNA from 25 pure bacterial colonies was fragmented with magnetic beads using the L-Beader 24 tissue disruptor (Loccus do Brasil Ltd.a, Cotia, SP, Brazil) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Bacterial genomic DNA was then semi-automatically extracted using the Maxwell® RSC instrument for the RSC Genomic DNA Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A volume of 100 µL of supernatant from each sample was suspended in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) in a tube containing 200 µL of lysis buffer and 20 µL of proteinase K.
Specific primers previously described (Supplementary Table S1) were used to identify S. agalactiae serotypes Ia, Ib, and III [31]. qPCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 10 μL containing 2X GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (5 μL) (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), 300 nM of each primer (1.4 μL), and 1.5 μL of DNA template from each sample in duplicate. Reactions were carried out using a QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s. Positive controls (DNA of S. agalactiae serotypes Ia, Ib, and III), a no-template negative control (UPW), and a negative extraction control were included in every run.
Cycling-threshold (Ct) values were manually set and recorded up to a maximum Ct value of 40, ensuring that thresholds remained constant between runs. Fish samples were considered positive at Ct values <35 and negative at Ct values of 35–40 or when no Ct value was obtained (NoCt), consistent with established analytical criteria for qPCR-based diagnostics in aquatic animal pathogens [32,33]. All qPCR runs included amplification of the Nile tilapia reference gene β-actin as an endogenous extraction control [34].

2.7. Multilocus Sequence Typing and Phylogenetic Analysis

Genomic DNA for MLST (multilocus sequence typing) analysis was extracted from pure bacterial colonies, as described above. Fragments ranging from 459 to 519 bp from the reference genes were amplified by PCR using previously described primers [35] (Supplementary Table S1). Amplified products were purified and sequenced bidirectionally using the Sanger method with BigDye 3.1 reagent and a 3500xL capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequences were aligned using ClustalW and BioEdit software (version 7.7.1) [36]. After alignment of the seven amplicons from each isolate with the S. agalactiae PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/streptococcus-agalactiae accessed on 21 September 2025), a sequence type (ST) and a clonal complex (CC) were assigned to each strain.
A phylogenetic analysis was performed using concatenated nucleotide sequences of the seven housekeeping genes obtained through MLST analysis. Evolutionary relationships among 41 S. agalactiae isolates (25 LAM ST7 CC1 isolates from the present study and 16 reference strains from Asia and previous LAM isolates available in GenBank) were inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method with Maximum Composite Likelihood distances [37]. Sequences spanning 3455 aligned positions (1st, 2nd, and 3rd codon positions and noncoding sites; gaps removed by complete deletion) were analyzed in MEGA11 version 11 [38]. Nodal support was evaluated using 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates, and values ≥70% are shown. Trees were drawn to scale, with branch lengths representing evolutionary distance (substitutions per site). Isolates were classified into serotype groups (SaIa ST7, Salb, SaIII) according to phylogenetic clustering with reference strains. All MLST sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers PZ024150 to PZ024324.

2.8. Detection of Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Genomic DNA for the detection of virulence genes (VGs) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) was extracted from pure bacterial colonies, as described above. PCR assays targeting virulence-associated genes, including adhesins, invasins, and immune evasion genes (Supplementary Table S1), were performed using previously described primers and protocols [39,40]. In addition, PCR amplification of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) (Table 2) was performed according to previously described methods [41,42]. Briefly, PCR reactions were prepared according to the published protocols in a total volume of 25 µL per sample using GoTaq® Green Master Mix (12.5 µL) (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Amplification was performed in a T100 thermocycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 4 min. Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.

2.9. Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing

Quality control procedures for culture media, biosafety cabinet performance, and antimicrobial disk potency were routinely conducted in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, with adaptations for fish isolates [43]. Isolates were cultured overnight (18–24 h) in a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) incubator model TE-371/240 L (Tecnal Equipamentos, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) at 28 ± 2 °C. Fresh overnight cultures were suspended in sterile 0.85% saline and adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Culture purity was verified prior to each assay; however, longitudinal purity monitoring was not performed, as repeated freeze–thaw cycles may induce mutational events or loss of mobile genetic elements, potentially compromising the genetic integrity of stored isolates [44]. A sterile swab was used to inoculate Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) plates. Commercial antimicrobial disks corresponding to the agents evaluated in the MIC assay (oxytetracycline, OTC, 30 µg; florfenicol, FFC, 30 µg; amoxicillin, AMX, 10 µg; enrofloxacin, ENR, 5 µg) were aseptically placed on the agar surface. Plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 18–24 h in ambient air. After incubation, inhibition zone diameters were measured in millimeters [45].

2.10. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. agalactiae fish isolates was performed using the broth microdilution reference method in accordance with CLSI guidelines, with adaptations. MICs were determined according to CLSI M07 procedures [46]. Cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMHB) was used as the test medium. Antimicrobials tested (OTC, FFC, ENR, AMX) were prepared as stock solutions diluted in sterile 0.85% saline immediately prior to panel preparation. Twofold serial dilutions were prepared in 96-well microdilution plates to cover ten concentrations. The inoculum was standardized to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard and diluted to yield a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL in each well. Plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 16–20 h in ambient air. MICs were recorded as the lowest antimicrobial concentration showing no visible growth. Quality control (QC) testing was performed in parallel using Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, following the QC ranges specified in CLSI M07/M100 and VET01. Interpretive categories (susceptible, intermediate, resistant), when available, were assigned using the most recent CLSI veterinary-specific breakpoints (VET01). When no breakpoints were available for a specific antimicrobial–fish pathogen combination, MICs were reported without categorical interpretation.

3. Results

3.1. SaIa ST7 CC1 Represents a Single Clone Circulating in Farmed Tilapia Across LAM

All strains obtained from tilapia farms in the six LAM countries were phenotypically characterized as Gram-positive, beta-hemolytic cocci and identified as SaIa by agglutination testing and PCR (Figure 1). Each of the 25 isolates tested positive for SaIa by real-time qPCR (mean Ct = 16.92; SD = 1.44) (Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, MSLT analysis showed that all isolates shared the same combination of alleles—adhP(10), pheS(1), atr(2), glnA(1), sdhA(3), glcK(2), and tkt(2)—characteristic of ST7, which belongs to CC1 (Supplementary Table S2). Phylogenetic analysis further demonstrated that SaIa strains isolated from tilapia farmed in NAM, CAM, and SAM were closely related to each other (99% identity) (Figure 2) and to SaIa strains previously isolated from tilapia farmed in China, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam (99%) (Figure 2). SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates caused similar mortality rates across production stages under field conditions (FRY = 48–52%; PGO/GO = 47–57%) (Table 1). In all outbreaks from which the SaIa ST7 CC1 clone was isolated, water temperatures >32 °C were recorded (Table 1).

3.2. Clinical Disease Caused by SaIa ST7 CC1 Is Similar Across LAM but Varies with Fish Age

3.2.1. Clinical Signs and Gross Pathology

Outbreaks of piscine streptococcosis caused by SaIa ST7 CC1 were reported across all tilapia production stages in LAM (FRY, PGO, and GO) (Figure 3). In larvae/fry, streptococcosis was characterized primarily by anorexia (75.0%), lethargy (83.9%), erratic swimming and whirling behavior (81.7%), cerebral hemorrhage (18.6%), ascites (21.1%), stomach/intestinal hemorrhage (74.4%), intussusception (43.3%) (Figure 4), and, in several cases, hyperacute mortality as the sole clinical manifestation (Table 2). The co-occurrence of cerebral edema and exophthalmos was uncommon in fry (18.3%) but frequent in PGO/GO fish (68.3%).
In larger fish, including both the PGO and GO stages, streptococcosis was characterized primarily by anorexia (86.7%), lethargy (79.4%), erratic swimming and whirling behavior (87.8%), skin darkening (66.1%), unilateral or bilateral exophthalmos (73.9%), and corneal opacity (71.7%). Less frequent findings included fecal strings protruding from the anus and/or floating in the water (25.6%), C-shaped spinal curvature (24.4%), and hemorrhagic purulent skin ulcers in the perianal region (Table 2) (Figure 3).
Abdominal distension associated with gas accumulation in the swim bladder or hemorrhagic fluid in the coelomic cavity (68.3%), pericarditis or whitish discoloration of the heart (62.2%), and the presence of yellowish purulent material and meningeal opacity (62.8%) (Figure 5) were also observed (Table 2). Additional notable findings included irregular hepatic appearance and coloration, with mixed pale and congested areas (68.3%) (Figure 4), and abscesses containing purulent material and melanosis in skeletal muscle from fish weighing 100 g up to harvest weight (15.6%) (Figure 5).

3.2.2. Histopathology

Histopathological examination of infected fish revealed marked microscopic changes (Supplementary Figure S1), including intestinal mucosal hyperemia containing numerous coccoid bacteria, accompanied by mild-to-severe hemorrhage and a mild to-moderate mixed inflammatory reaction (89.3%); gastric mucosal hyperemia containing numerous coccoid bacteria (Figure 6), with epithelial ulceration and a mild mixed inflammatory reaction (67.9%); acute diffuse mixed meningitis with moderate multifocal necrotizing mixed encephalitis (42.9%) (Figure 6); and severe diffuse splenic capillary dilation containing coccoid bacteria (Figure 7), together with hyperplasia of melanomacrophage centers (42.9%). Consistent with the gross hepatic lesions observed in larger fish, microscopic hepatic changes were characterized by intravascular and perivascular coccoid bacteria within the hepatic parenchyma, accompanied by acute perivascular histiocytic inflammation and hyperemia (37.0%) (Figure 7), moderate bile duct hyperplasia within the hepatic parenchyma (21.4%), and moderate centrilobular vacuolar hepatopathy (10.7%).
Overall, most fish showed extensive colonization by Gram-positive cocci (Figure 6 and Figure 7), particularly within the bloodstream and multiple tissues and organs, including the stomach, intestines, brain, heart, spleen, and liver, confirming the systemic nature of the infection and suggesting hematogenous bacterial dissemination. Granulomatous lesions, which are commonly associated with chronic streptococcal infection, were infrequently observed, suggesting a hyperacute course of infection. Although inflammatory cell infiltration was generally minimal, phagocytic cells containing bacteria were observed in the spleen and meninges/brain.

3.3. LAM SaIa ST7 CC1 Shows a Uniform Virulence Profile

Although LAM SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates showed remarkable uniformity in the virulence genes (VGs) analyzed, minor differences allowed classification into two profiles, arbitrarily designated A and B in this study (Table 3). The predominant VG profile was spb1-bca-cfb-bac-dtIR (profile A) (Supplementary Figure S2), which was present in 60% (15/25) of isolates, followed by the spb1-bca-cfb-dtIR (profile B) profile, identified in 40% (10/25) of isolates. All isolates from C1, C3, C4, and C5 exhibited profile A (4 out of 6 countries), whereas isolates from C2 and C6 exhibited only profile B. None of the isolates from any country carried sodA or scpB. Supplementary Table S3 systematically compares the virulence profiles identified in this study with those of SaIa isolates previously described in China, Thailand/Vietnam, Indonesia, and Egypt.

3.4. LAM SaIa ST7 CC1 Exhibits a Similar Pattern of Antimicrobial Susceptibility

None of the analyzed SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates showed antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) associated with erythromycin, phenicols, or lincomycin resistance (ermB, ermTR, mefA, linB, fexA, fexB) (data are shown in Table 4). However, 20% (5/25) of isolates recovered from fish in three of the six countries carried ARGs associated with OTC resistance (tetM or tetO) (Table 4; Supplementary Figure S3). Phenotypically, isolates exhibited either susceptibility (16%, 4/25) or intermediate susceptibility (84%, 21/25) to OTC (Table 4). Among isolates with intermediate susceptibility, 23.8% (4/21) carried tetM or tetO (Table 4). The four susceptible isolates showed an MIC of 0.5 µm/mL for OTC, whereas the 21 isolates with intermediate susceptibility (I) showed MIC values ranging from 1 to 4 µm/mL (Table 4).
No SaIa isolate carried ARGs associated with FFC resistance (fexA, fexB), and all isolates were classified as susceptible based on inhibition zones ranging from 30 to 36 mm (Table 4). Among these isolates, 84% (21/25) showed MIC values < 1 µm/mL, whereas 16% (4/25) showed MIC values of 2 µm/mL for FFC. Similarly, all isolates (25/25) showed susceptibility to AMX, with inhibition zones ranging from 30 to 46 mm and MIC values ≤ 0.5 µm/mL (Table 4). Finally, all isolates (25/25) showed intermediate sensitivity to ENR, with inhibition zones ranging from 21 to 26 mm and MIC values of 4 µm/mL (Table 4). Overall, the phenotypic susceptibility data suggest that the ST7 CC1 clone currently circulating in LAM has not yet acquired clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance, although continued surveillance remains warranted.

4. Discussion

4.1. Molecular Epidemiology

The high genetic homogeneity observed among SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates reflects the recent clonal expansion occurring in LAM tilapia production from a molecular epidemiological perspective [20,25,40,47]. Although MLST is useful for initial molecular epidemiological investigations, it provides limited resolution for reconstructing introduction routes, microevolutionary dynamics, or the number of independent dissemination events; therefore, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is strongly recommended for future studies. The close phylogenetic relationship between these new isolates and Asian SaIa ST7 CC1 strains suggests an epidemiological connection between the two regions, consistent with the historical movement of live tilapia broodstock and fingerlings [48]. Although the available data are insufficient to reconstruct direct transmission pathways, introduction through trade in live fish remains a plausible scenario that should be investigated in import risk analyses.

4.2. Pathological and Clinical Disease

Clinically, SaIa ST7 CC1 produced a consistent but stage-dependent disease pattern across all farms assessed [49]. In FRY, hyperacute septicemia characterized by anorexia, lethargy, erratic swimming behavior (swimming in circles), severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and frequent intestinal intussusception predominated and rapidly progressed to high cumulative mortality within short time periods [50]. This rapid systemic dissemination often resulted in death within 48 h, preventing the development of distinctive neurological signs or generalized hemorrhage [51,52,53,54,55]. Although intestinal intussusception is rarely documented in piscine streptococcosis, it has been reported in parasitic, viral, and bacterial enteritis [56]. The detection of ST7 in larvae weighing as little as 0.5 g is consistent with either early horizontal transmission in hatcheries or vertical transmission, although this study did not directly investigate parental infection. Vertical transmission of S. agalactiae from broodstock to fry has been demonstrated previously in tilapia, including colonization of the gonads of asymptomatic breeders [52,53,54,57].
Neurological and ocular signs, including erratic swimming, loss of buoyancy control, exophthalmos, and corneal opacity, commonly occurred alongside generalized hemorrhagic lesions and coelomic changes in PGO and GO fish [40,51,52,53,54,55,58]. The absence of exophthalmos in fry despite cerebral involvement likely reflects the compliance and incomplete ossification of the skull, which may accommodate increased intracranial pressure without retrobulbar extension [59], together with a hyperacute septicemic course that precedes sustained edema formation [60], an immature BBB, an undeveloped retrobulbar space, and a less organized inflammatory response than adult fish [53].
In adult fish, externally expelled undigested fecal material (25.6%) was identified as a clinically relevant manifestation of streptococcosis in tilapia. Although not pathognomonic, similar fecal strings have been reported in 20–40% of experimentally infected fish [61]. In addition, progressive skeletal muscle abscesses with dystrophic mineralization and cavitation (15.6%), particularly in the caudal peduncle region, may substantially impair fillet quality, increase carcass condemnation, and potentially elevate zoonotic risk [24,39,62].
The occurrence of outbreaks across all production phases, from larvae to harvest-size fish, underscores the pathogen’s capacity to evade host defenses regardless of age-related immunocompetence [53]. Recent outbreaks involving strains such as ST283 have likewise been documented in fish of all sizes, including fry, harvest-size adults, and broodstock, confirming the capacity of these lineages to affect multiple life stages and potentially cross species barriers as zoonotic pathogens [29,49,63,64].
Histopathological analyses revealed extensive colonization of the brain, spleen, liver, and intestine by Gram-positive cocci, accompanied by severe acute circulatory and inflammatory lesions in the affected organs and an absence of substantial chronic granulomatous responses. The rapid systemic dissemination, marked neurotropism, and minimal chronic inflammation are indicative of a highly virulent hyperacute pathogenesis associated with S. agalactiae lineages infecting sensitive tilapia hosts. Comparative pathogenicity studies have demonstrated that ST7 consistently induces more severe histopathological lesions in the brain, liver, and spleen than ST283, suggesting differences in tissue tropism and pathogenic mechanisms [40]. The microscopic lesions observed in the present study are consistent with previous descriptions of SaIa infection and further demonstrate the capacity of SaIa ST7 CC1 to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and establish severe meningoencephalitis in juvenile and adult farmed tilapia.
Although the precise route of central nervous system (CNS) invasion was not directly investigated in the present field study, several well-characterized mechanisms by which GBS traverses the BBB are likely relevant to the neurological pathology observed. These mechanisms include transcellular invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) mediated by the surface adhesins SfbA [65], Srr-1 [66], and lipoteichoic acid [67]; paracellular disruption of tight junction integrity driven by β-hemolysin/cytolysin [68] and hyaluronidase [69]; and exploitation of the host plasminogen system to acquire surface-associated proteolytic activity that facilitates extracellular matrix degradation [70]. More recently, direct BMEC lysis by GBS was demonstrated in zebrafish models, representing an additional mechanism of CNS invasion [71]. Collectively, these mechanisms are consistent with the rapid progression, high bacteremia, and acute inflammatory lesions characteristic of SaIa ST7 CC1 infection documented in the present study. Experimental studies directly targeting these virulence pathways in tilapia models are warranted to clarify their relative contributions to CNS invasion.
The repeated temporal association between SaIa ST7 CC1 outbreaks and prolonged periods of elevated water temperature indicates that thermal stress may be a key factor amplifying disease expression within affected production systems [48,72]. All affected farms experienced sustained water temperatures exceeding 32 °C, pronounced day–night thermal fluctuations, and low dissolved oxygen concentrations, conditions known to impair physiological resilience and immune performance in tilapia. Although comparable environmental data from unaffected farms were unavailable for relative risk assessment, the temporal concurrence between outbreaks and thermal anomalies, combined with existing experimental evidence, supports a model in which elevated temperature and associated stressors reduce the threshold for SaIa ST7 CC1 disease expression.
Genetically improved lines, including the widely disseminated GIFT strain and related commercial derivatives, were selectively bred for rapid growth [73,74,75,76,77] and feed efficiency [78,79] under optimal aquaculture temperatures (27–30 °C) [80,81,82]. However, genetically improved farmed tilapia exhibit significantly lower heat tolerance than native or locally adapted Nile tilapia strains, with differences in lethal thermal thresholds ranging from 3.6 °C to 4.0 °C [77,83,84,85]. Concurrent evidence indicates that heat stress compromises tilapia immune function [86,87] while facilitating the expression of bacterial virulence factors [13,77,87].
At the same time, biosecurity protocols designed for relatively stable thermal conditions may become inadequate when production systems are exposed to temperatures > 32 °C [6,14,88,89]. The 2023–2024 El Niño phenomenon generated significant environmental disturbances across, particularly water scarcity and elevated temperatures. Although development and validation of a predictive risk model were beyond the scope of the present study, the findings identify several key variables, including the movement of unscreened animals and the interaction among elevated temperature, low dissolved oxygen, fish age, and clonal lineage, that should be incorporated into future targeted risk-modeling studies and climate-adaptive farm management strategies aimed at reducing-associated disease spillover.

4.3. Virulence Gene Architecture and Host-Adapted Pathogenesis

The highly conserved VG repertoire in SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates recovered from diverse environments across six LAM countries suggests that the clone has established a stable set of determinants that confers a substantial selective advantage in tilapia, regardless of local environmental conditions [39,90]. In contrast, ST7 isolates from non-tilapia hosts are more heterogeneous, suggesting that adaptation to tilapia has been mediated by host-specific genomic specialization [39,90,91].
The predominant VG profile detected in LAM isolates (spb1-bca-cfb-dltR), defined by the universal absence of sodA and scpB, differed from the ten profiles identified in seminal Chinese tilapia isolates, in which the dltR-bca-sodA-spib-cfb-bac combination was common [39]. This regional divergence highlights the genomic plasticity of S. agalactiae and suggests a model of local adaptation involving both the acquisition and loss of specific determinants [22,26,39,92].
The conserved presence of cfb (CAMP factor) in all isolates in this study, despite its variable frequency in human and bovine SaIa ST7 isolates [39,40,93,94,95], suggests that CAMP-mediated cytotoxicity is a critical determinant of pathogenesis in tilapia, in which phagocyte lysis represents a central immune-evasion mechanism. S. agalactiae strains that were CAMP-test negative (lacking the cfb gene) in 2013 were reported as CAMP-test positive by 2023, suggesting adaptive shifts in virulence traits under warmer conditions [14]. In contrast, the pervasive absence of sodA and scpB suggests that these strains have shifted from a paradigm based on oxidative stress resistance and complement inactivation to one that is more rapid and cytolytic in nature, mediated by CAMP factor and capsular C antigen (bca), supplemented with adhesion/invasion (spb1), resistance to antimicrobial peptide killing (dltR), and evasion of innate immunity (bac).
This profile is mechanistically consistent with the observed pattern of rapid bacteremia, hemorrhagic septicemia, and meningoencephalitis. Additional virulence factors, including cylE, lmb, and hylB, which are common in other piscine CC1 lineages [26,40,47,96], were not investigated in this study but should be prioritized in future genomic analyses to fully characterize the neurotropic phenotype. These findings have immediate implications for vaccine design [20,23], supporting strategies that target conserved SaIa ST7 CC1 antigens and suggesting that prime-boost regimens, rather than single injectable doses, may be required to elicit effective protection.

4.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Early Resistance Alarms

All SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates were phenotypically susceptible to FFC and AMX according to the interpretive criteria applied, suggesting that this emergent clone has not yet developed robust resistance to key aquaculture therapeutics used in LAM [97]. However, 84% and 100% of the isolates showed intermediate susceptibility to OTC and enrofloxacin (ENR), respectively. This pattern contrasts with reports from other geographic regions, where S. agalactiae and related fish-pathogenic streptococci exhibit reduced susceptibility or established resistance to commonly used antimicrobials [47,98,99].
The intermediate susceptibility to OTC may be preliminarily associated with the sporadic detection of tetM and tetO genes in ST7 CC1 isolates. However, since this study assessed only the presence or absence of these genes on mobile genetic elements, without evaluating their functional expression, the clinical and epidemiological significance of this finding remains uncertain. More detailed genomic analyses, including WGS to elucidate the genetic context of ARGs, together with functional studies examining gene expression under different antimicrobial and environmental conditions, will be necessary to characterize the trajectory and stability of resistance in this clone.

4.5. Implications for Surveillance, Biosecurity, and Future Research

Integrated evidence shows that SaIa ST7 CC1 constitutes an emerging threat to tilapia aquaculture in LAM, with high virulence across production stages and associations with geographic dissemination, thermal stress, and the early acquisition of ARGs. Effective control will require integrated interventions across multiple scales rather than farm-level solutions alone. Priority measures include implementing molecular screening (MLST or WGS) of imported broodstock and fingerlings to prevent the introduction and re-introduction of high-risk clones; establishing harmonized regional outbreak-reporting and molecular-surveillance networks to monitor SaIa ST7 CC1 and related lineages; and incorporating climate-adaptive management strategies, such as temperature and dissolved oxygen monitoring, stocking-density adjustments, and movement restrictions during periods of elevated thermal risk. The development and deployment of serotype-matched vaccines targeting SaIa ST7 CC1, within the framework of broader biosecurity programs, will ultimately be essential to reduce antimicrobial dependence and increase the resilience of tilapia production systems.
Future studies should include WGS of SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates from multiple countries and time points to investigate virulence determinants, antimicrobial resistance gene content, and microevolutionary patterns under regional selective pressures. Controlled infection experiments in tilapia with distinct genetic backgrounds under standardized temperature and environmental conditions would help clarify the relative contributions of pathogen genotype, host lineage, and thermal stress to clinical disease outcomes and survival. These efforts, combined with longitudinal field studies integrating environmental monitoring, production data, and pathogen genomics, will provide the basis for improving risk models, informing selective breeding programs for disease and heat tolerance, and guiding evidence-based policies on antimicrobial use and fish movement within the LAM tilapia industry.

5. Conclusions

The cluster of strains identified as SaIa ST7 CC1, associated with acute streptococcosis outbreaks in Nile tilapia across six countries in LAM, reflects the recent emergence of a clonal lineage exhibiting uniform yet age-dependent clinical and pathological disease expression. In larvae and fingerlings, hyperacute septicemia with severe gastrointestinal involvement predominates, whereas in pre-grow-out (PGO) and grow-out (GO) fish, a systemic neurotropic disease with significant ocular and coelomic lesions predominates.
All field outbreaks coincided with intervals of elevated water temperature exceeding 32 °C and low dissolved oxygen, reinforcing the role of thermal and environmental stress as key amplifiers of disease expression in intensively farmed tilapia under anthropogenic climate warming. Although SaIa ST7 CC1 retains phenotypic susceptibility to critical aquaculture antimicrobials, the recent detection of tetM and tetO in a subpopulation of isolates suggests that tetracycline resistance determinants are already present and may emerge under inappropriate antimicrobial use.
These findings establish SaIa ST7 CC1 as a regionally expanding threat to Latin American tilapia aquaculture, requiring coordinated action, including molecular screening of imported broodstock and fry, harmonized surveillance networks, climate-adaptive farm management, serotype-matched vaccination, and antimicrobial stewardship. Collectively, these measures aim to reduce production losses and strengthen aquaculture resilience against transboundary pathogens under accelerating climate change.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens15050545/s1, Table S1: Primers used to determine virulence genes (VGs) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in 25 strains of S. agalactiae Ia isolated between 2021 and 2025 from larvae/fry, juveniles (PGO), and adults (GO) of Nile tilapia experiencing outbreaks of piscine streptococcosis in six Latin American countries; Table S2: qPCR (CTs) and MLST results for the 25 isolates from the six Latin American countries; Table S3: Systematic comparative analysis of the virulence profiles generated in this study with those of the Sa1a isolates described in China, Thailand/Vietnam, Indonesia and Egypt; Figure S1: Frequency of microscopic changes observed in different tissues of fish undergoing outbreaks of streptococcosis caused by SaIa ST7 CC1 in all production stages of tilapia farming in six Latin American countries; Figure S2: Results of conventional PCR amplification, showing the expected band size for detection of the target virulence gene in the analyzed samples. The amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide dye. L1: molecular weight marker; L2–L8: sample amplicons for the respective target gene; C: control. The colored lines show amplicons of the isolates C6–A1 (white), C2–A3 (red), C2–A2 (yellow), and C2–A3 (turquoise); Figure S3: Results of conventional PCR amplification, showing the expected band sizes for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in the analyzed samples. The amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide dye. L1: molecular weight marker; L2–L10: sample amplicons for the respective target gene; C: control. Amplicons for the tetO gene in isolates C2–A3 (red), C2–A2 (yellow), and C2–A3 (turquoise).

Author Contributions

M.R.-S.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, investigation, resources, project administration, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. M.F.-A.: formal analysis, data curation, resources, project administration, supervision. M.M.-N.: formal analysis, methodology, resources, data curation, investigation. R.G.: formal analysis, methodology, resources, data curation, investigation. R.H.: formal analysis, methodology, resources, data curation, investigation. M.C.-G.: formal analysis, methodology, resources, data curation, investigation. R.I.: formal analysis, methodology, resources, data curation, investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Pathovet Labs’ internal budget. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocols for fish sampling, euthanasia, necropsy, and tissue collection were reviewed and approved by CEUA-Pathovet Labs (Protocol No. 004/2026, 4 March 2026). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All MLST sequences obtained were submitted to GenBank and assigned accession numbers PZ024150 to PZ024324, and raw sequencing data are available upon request. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to every one of the professionals and field technicians from each of the tilapia-producing companies, whose management and work allowed us to carry out this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare the following competing interests: Marco Rozas-Serri, Miguel Fernández-Alarcón, Mariene Miyoko-Natori, Renata Galetti, Mateus Cardoso-Guimarães, and Ricardo Ildefonso are employees of Pathovet Labs. Ricardo Harakava declares no competing interests.

References

  1. FAO. GLOBEFISH Quarterly Tilapia Analysis; Issue 4; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fact.MR. Tilapia Market Forecast and Outlook 2025 to 2035; Market Analysis Report; Fact.MR: Rockville, MD, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  3. Burad-Méndez, A.; Domínguez-May, R.; Olvera-Novoa, M.A.; Robledo, D.; Salas, S. Economic analysis of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production based on farm size and number of rearing tanks. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2023, 51, 747–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Siddique, M.A.B.; Mahalder, B.; Haque, M.M.; Ahammad, A.K.S. Impact of climatic and water quality parameters on Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) broodfish growth: Integrating ARIMA and ARIMAX for precise modeling and forecasting. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0313846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeyachandran, S. Review on climate change, microbial resilience, and disease risks in global aquaculture systems. Comp. Immunol. Rep. 2025, 9, 200240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Okon, E.M.; Oyesiji, A.A.; Okeleye, E.D.; Kanonuhwa, M.; Khalifa, N.E.; Eissa, E.H.; Mathew, R.T.; Eissa, M.E.H.; Alqahtani, M.A.; Abdelnour, S.A. The Escalating threat of climate change-driven diseases in fish: Evidence from a global perspective—A literature review. Environ. Res. 2024, 263, 120184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Islam, M.A.; Kunda, M.; Harun-Al-Rashid, A.; Sunny, A.R.; Mithun, M.H.; Sazzad, S.A.; Bhuiyan, M.K.A. Can Climate-Resilient Tilapia Cage Culture Support Sustainable Livelihoods in Flood-Prone Bangladesh? Water 2025, 17, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Djurichkovic, L.D.; Donelson, J.M.; Fowler, A.M.; Feary, D.A.; Booth, D.J. The effects of water temperature on the juvenile performance of two tropical damselfishes expatriating to temperate reefs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Nader, M.M.; Salem, H.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Soliman, S.M.; Khafaga, A.F. Effect of environmental factors on growth performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Int. J. Biometeorol. 2022, 66, 2183–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Liu, P.; Wan, Z.Y.; Huang, S.Q.; Wen, Y.F.; Lin, G.; Yue, G.H. RNA-Seq revealed the impairment of immune defence of tilapia against the infection of Streptococcus agalactiae with simulated climate warming. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2016, 55, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Imperi, M.; Pataracchia, M.; Alfarone, G.; Baldassarri, L.; Orefici, G.; Creti, R. A multiplex PCR assay for the direct identification of the capsular type (Ia to IX) of Streptococcus agalactiae. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 80, 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kayansamruaj, P.; Pirarat, N.; Hirono, I.; Rodkhum, C. Increasing of temperature induces pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae and the up-regulation of inflammatory related genes in infected Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 172, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tavares, G.C.; Carvalho, A.F.; Pereira, F.L.; Rezende, C.P.; Azevedo, V.A.C.; Leal, C.A.G.; Figueiredo, H.C.P. Transcriptome and Proteome of Fish-Pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae Are Modulated by Temperature. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lusiastuti, A.M.; Suhermanto, A.; Hastilestari, B.R.; Suryanto, S.; Mawardi, M.; Sugiani, D.; Syahidah, D.; Sudaryatma, P.E.; Caruso, D. Impact of temperature on the virulence of Streptococcus agalactiae in Indonesian aquaculture: A better vaccine design is required. Vet. World 2024, 17, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, A. Alterations and resilience of intestinal microbiota to increased water temperature are accompanied by the recovery of immune function in Nile tilapia. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ng, T.H.; M, S.; Chew, X.Z.; Nair, T.; Chow, J.W.; Low, A.; Seedorf, H.; Bastos Gomes, G. Dissecting the impact of heat stress on heat-shock response and skin microbiota in farmed fish in a recirculating aquaculture system in Singapore. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e0056824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Singh, M.; Saini, V.P.; Meena, L.L. Heat stress induces oxidative stress and weakens the immune system in catfish Clarias magur: Evidence from physiological, histological, and transcriptomic analyses. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2025, 161, 110294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guijarro, J.A.; Cascales, D.; García-Torrico, A.I.; García-Domínguez, M.; Méndez, J. Temperature-dependent expression of virulence genes in fish-pathogenic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahieddine, F.C.; Mathieu-Denoncourt, A.; Duperthuy, M. Temperature Influences Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Clinical Isolates from Quebec, Canada. Pathogens 2025, 14, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fyrand, K.; Xu, C.; Evensen, Ø. Characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae 1a isolated from farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in North America, Central America, and Southeast Asia. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2024, 154, 109919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rozas-Serri, M. Characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae serotype 1a, ST7, CC1 isolated from outbreaks in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farmed in six Latin American countries. LACQUA 25 Abstr. Book 2025, 326. [Google Scholar]
  22. Barony, G.M.; Tavares, G.C.; Pereira, F.L.; Carvalho, A.F.; Dorella, F.A.; Leal, C.A.G.; Figueiredo, H.C.P. Large-scale genomic analyses reveal the population structure and evolutionary trends of Streptococcus agalactiae strains in Brazilian fish farms. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rozas-Serri, M. Field efficacy results of vaccines for the control of streptococcosis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae serotype 1a ST-7 CC-1 in farmed tilapia in Latin America. LACQUA 24 Abstr. Book 2024, 442. [Google Scholar]
  24. Laith, A.A.; Ambak, M.A.; Hassan, M.; Sheriff, S.M.; Nadirah, M.; Draman, A.S.; Wahab, W.; Ibrahim, W.N.; Aznan, A.S.; Jabar, A.; et al. Molecular identification and histopathological study of natural Streptococcus agalactiae infection in hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Vet. World 2017, 10, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kayansamruaj, P.; Pirarat, N.; Kondo, H.; Hirono, I.; Rodkhum, C. Genomic comparison between pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from Nile tilapia in Thailand and fish-derived ST7 strains. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 36, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kannika, K.; Pisuttharachai, D.; Srisapoome, P.; Wongtavatchai, J.; Kondo, H.; Hirono, I.; Unajak, S.; Areechon, N. Molecular serotyping, virulence gene profiling and pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from tilapia farms in Thailand by multiplex PCR. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guo, C.-M.; Chen, R.-R.; Kalhoro, D.H.; Wang, Z.-F.; Liu, G.-J.; Lu, C.-P.; Liu, Y.-J. Identification of Genes Preferentially Expressed by Highly Virulent Piscine Streptococcus agalactiae upon Interaction with Macrophages. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anshary, H.; Kurniawan, R.A.; Sriwulan, S.; Ramli, R.; Baxa, D.V. Isolation and molecular identification of the etiological agents of streptococcosis in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in net cages in Lake Sentani, Papua, Indonesia. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suhermanto, A.; Sukenda, S.; Zairin, M., Jr.; Lusiastuti, A.M.; Nuryati, S. Characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae bacterium isolated from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) culture in Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 2019, 12, 756–766. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bennett, R.H.; Ellender, B.R.; Mäkinen, T.; Miya, T.; Pattrick, P.; Wasserman, R.J.; Woodford, D.J.; Weyl, O.L. Ethical considerations for field research on fishes. Koedoe 2016, 58, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Furfaro, L.L.; Chang, B.J.; Payne, M.S. A novel one-step real-time multiplex PCR assay to detect Streptococcus agalactiae presence and serotypes Ia, Ib, and III. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 89, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Caraguel, C.G.; Stryhn, H.; Gagné, N.; Dohoo, I.R.; Hammell, K.L. Selection of a cutoff value for real-time polymerase chain reaction results to fit a diagnostic purpose: Analytical and epidemiologic approaches. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2011, 23, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Leigh, W.J.; Zadoks, R.N.; Costa, J.Z.; Jaglarz, A.; Thompson, K.D. Development and evaluation of a quantitative polymerase chain reaction for aquatic Streptococcus agalactiae based on the groEL gene. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, C.G.; Wang, X.L.; Tian, J.; Liu, W.; Wu, F.; Jiang, M.; Wen, H. Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of gene expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Gene 2013, 527, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jones, N.; Bohnsack, J.F.; Takahashi, S.; Oliver, K.A.; Chan, M.S.; Kunst, F.; Glaser, P.; Rusniok, C.; Crook, D.W.; Harding, R.M.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for group B streptococcus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2530–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. In Proceedings of the Nucleic Acids Symposium Series, London, UK, 1–5 November 1999; pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tamura, K.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11030–11035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, J.; Fang, W.; Ke, B.; He, D.; Liang, Y.; Ning, D.; Tan, H.; Peng, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; et al. Inapparent Streptococcus agalactiae infection in adult/commercial tilapia. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Syuhada, R.; Zamri-Saad, M.; Ina-Salwany, M.Y.; Mustafa, M.; Nasruddin, N.N.; Desa, M.N.M.; Nordin, S.A.; Barkham, T.; Amal, M.N.A. Molecular characterization and pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae serotypes Ia ST7 and III ST283 isolated from cultured red hybrid tilapia in Malaysia. Aquaculture 2020, 515, 734543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Assane, I.M.; de Oliveira Neto, R.R.; de Abreu Reis Ferreira, D.; do Vale Oliveira, A.; Hashimoto, D.T.; Pilarski, F. Genetic diversity, virulence genes, antimicrobial resistance genes, and antimicrobial susceptibility of group B Streptococcus (GBS) associated with mass mortalities of cultured Nile tilapia in Brazil. Microb. Pathog. 2025, 205, 107664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mudzana, R.; Mavenyengwa, R.T.; Gudza-Mugabe, M. Analysis of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes in group B streptococcus from clinical samples. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. CLSI M100:2025; Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 35th Ed. CLSI Supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2025.
  44. Sleight, S.C.; Wigginton, N.S.; Lenski, R.E. Increased susceptibility to repeated freeze-thaw cycles in Escherichia coli following long-term evolution in a benign environment. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  45. CLSI standard VET01; Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 6th Ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2024.
  46. CLSI M07 Standard (12th edition); Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2024.
  47. Algammal, A.M.; Mabrok, M.; Almessiry, B.K.; Atwah, B.; Al-otaibi, A.S.; Mohamed, Y.S.; Steele, S.; Enany, M.; Dayrit, G.B.; Yousseff, F.M.; et al. Unraveling the pathogenic potential, virulence traits, and antibiotic resistance genes of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae strains retrieved from Nile tilapia. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gupta, M.; Acosta, B. From drawing board to dining table: The success story of the GIFT project. Naga 2004, 27, 4–14. [Google Scholar]
  49. Castro, R.; Jouneau, L.; Tacchi, L.; Macqueen, D.J.; Alzaid, A.; Secombes, C.J.; Martin, S.A.M.; Boudinot, P. Disparate developmental patterns of immune responses to bacterial and viral infections in fish. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pulpipat, T.; Boonyawiwat, V.; Moonjit, P.; Sanguankiat, A.; Phatthanakunanan, S.; Jala, S.; Surachetpong, W. Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype VII, an Emerging Pathogen Affecting Snakeskin Gourami (Trichogaster pectoralis) in Intensive Farming. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2023, 2023, 1682047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ferrari, N.A.; Favero, L.M.; Facimoto, C.T.; Dall Agnol, A.M.; Gaeta, M.L.; de Oliveira, T.E.S.; Gonçalves, D.D.; Lopera-Barrero, N.M.; Pereira, U.d.P.; Di Santis, G.W. Clinical and Histopathological Evolution of Acute Intraperitoneal Infection by Streptococcus agalactiae Serotypes Ib and III in Nile Tilapia. Fishes 2024, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Van Doan, H.; Soltani, M.; Leitão, A.; Shafiei, S.; Asadi, S.; Lymbery, A.J.; Ringø, E. Streptococcosis a Re-Emerging Disease in Aquaculture: Significance and Phytotherapy. Animals 2022, 12, 2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abdallah, E.S.H.; Metwally, W.G.M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.M.; Albano, M.; Mahmoud, M.M. Streptococcus agalactiae Infection in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): A Review. Biology 2024, 13, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pradeep, P.J.; Suebsing, R.; Sirthammajak, S.; Kampeera, J.; Jitrakorn, S.; Saksmerprome, V.; Turner, W.; Palang, I.; Vanichviriyakit, R.; Senapin, S.; et al. Evidence of vertical transmission and tissue tropism of Streptococcosis from naturally infected red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Aquac. Rep. 2016, 3, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Legario, F.S.; Choresca, C.H., Jr.; Turnbull, J.F.; Crumlish, M. Isolation and molecular characterization of streptococcal species recovered from clinical infections in farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in the Philippines. J. Fish Dis. 2020, 43, 1431–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Montelongo-Alfaro, I.O.; Rabago-Castro, J.L.; Sanchez-Martinez, J.G.; Benavides-Gonzalez, F.; De La Cruz-Hernandez, N.I. Report on Intussusception in Channel Catfish Ictalurus Punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818) from Commercial Farms in Mexico: A Case Study. Indian J. Fish. 2018, 65, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Haenen, O.L.M.; Dong, H.T.; Hoai, T.D.; Crumlish, M.; Karunasagar, I.; Barkham, T.; Chen, S.L.; Zadoks, R.; Kiermeier, A.; Wang, B.; et al. Bacterial diseases of tilapia, their zoonotic potential and risk of antimicrobial resistance. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 154–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cao, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Guo, F.; Gao, F.; Wang, M.; Yi, M.; Lu, M. Distribution and localization of Streptococcus agalactiae in different tissues of artificially infected tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Filik, N. Ocular Ailments Doctrine (Ophthalmology) in Fish: Exophthalmia Scenario as Forzando and Eyes-Brain Connection. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2025, 76, 8945–8954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, B.J.; Hancock, B.M.; Del Cid, N.; Bermudez, A.; Traver, D.; Doran, K.S. Streptococcus agalactiae infection in zebrafish larvae. Microb. Pathog. 2015, 79, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pasnik, D.J.; Evans, J.J.; Klesius, P.H. Fecal strings associated with Streptococcus agalactiae infection in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Open Vet. Sci. J. 2009, 3, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  62. Ferreira, J.A., Jr.; Leal, C.A.G.; de Oliveira, T.F.; Nascimento, K.A.; de Macêdo, J.T.S.A.; Pedroso, P.M.O. Anatomopathological characterization and etiology of lesions on Nile tilapia fillets (Oreochromis niloticus) caused by bacterial pathogens. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Aiewsakun, P.; Ruangchai, W.; Thawornwattana, Y.; Jaemsai, B.; Mahasirimongkol, S.; Homkaew, A.; Suksomchit, P.; Dubbs, P.; Palittapongarnpim, P. Genomic epidemiology of Streptococcus agalactiae ST283 in Southeast Asia. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Barkham, T.; Zadoks, R.N.; Azmai, M.N.A.; Baker, S.; Bich, V.T.N.; Chalker, V.; Chau, M.L.; Dance, D.; Deepak, R.N.; van Doorn, H.R.; et al. One hypervirulent clone, sequence type 283, accounts for a large proportion of invasive Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from humans and diseased tilapia in Southeast Asia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mu, R.; Kim, B.J.; Paco, C.; Rosario, Y.D.; Courtney, H.S.; Doran, K.S. Identification of a Group B Streptococcal Fibronectin Binding Protein, SfbA, That Contributes to Invasion of Brain Endothelium and Development of Meningitis. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 2276–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. van Sorge, N.M.; Quach, D.; Gurney, M.A.; Sullam, P.M.; Nizet, V.; Doran, K.S. The group B streptococcal serine-rich repeat 1 glycoprotein mediates penetration of the blood-brain barrier. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 199, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Doran, K.S.; Engelson, E.J.; Khosravi, A.; Maisey, H.C.; Fedtke, I.; Equils, O.; Michelsen, K.S.; Arditi, M.; Peschel, A.; Nizet, V. Blood-brain barrier invasion by group B Streptococcus depends upon proper cell-surface anchoring of lipoteichoic acid. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 2499–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Doran, K.S.; Liu, G.Y.; Nizet, V. Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin/cytolysin activates neutrophil signaling pathways in brain endothelium and contributes to development of meningitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Luo, S.; Cao, Q.; Ma, K.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G.; Lu, C.; Liu, Y. Quantitative assessment of the blood-brain barrier opening caused by Streptococcus agalactiae hyaluronidase in a BALB/c mouse model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Magalhães, V.; Andrade, E.B.; Alves, J.; Ribeiro, A.; Kim, K.S.; Lima, M.; Trieu-Cuot, P.; Ferreira, P. Group B Streptococcus Hijacks the Host Plasminogen System to Promote Brain Endothelial Cell Invasion. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ravishankar, S.; Tuohey, S.M.; Ramos, N.O.; Uchiyama, S.; Hayes, M.I.; Kang, K.; Nizet, V.; Madigan, C.A. Group B Streptococci lyse endothelial cells to infect the brain in a zebrafish meningitis model. PLoS Biol. 2025, 23, e3003236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rodkhum, C.; Kayansamruaj, P.; Pirarat, N. Effect of water temperature on susceptibility to Streptococcus agalactiae serotype Ia infection in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Thai J. Vet. Med. 2011, 41, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Barría, A.; Benzie, J.A.H.; Houston, R.D.; De Koning, D.-J.; de Verdal, H. Genomic Selection and Genome-wide Association Study for Feed-Efficiency Traits in a Farmed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Population. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ponzoni, R.W.; Nguyen, N.H.; Khaw, H.L.; Hamzah, A.; Bakar, K.R.A.; Yee, H.Y. Genetic improvement of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with special reference to the work conducted by the WorldFish Center with the GIFT strain. Rev. Aquac. 2011, 3, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ansah, Y.B.; Frimpong, E.A.; Hallerman, E.M. Genetically-Improved Tilapia Strains in Africa: Potential Benefits and Negative Impacts. Sustainability 2014, 6, 3697–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bezerra, V.M.; Reis, G.P.A.; de Melo, C.L.; Menezes, W.F.; dos Santos, B.D.; Ferreira, M.P.; Pires, D.C.; da Costa, F.F.B.; Ramírez, J.F.P.; Teixeira, J.P.; et al. A long-term high temperature on young Nile tilapia females affects its urogenital papilla morphology and future reproductive performance. Aquaculture 2025, 595, 741666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Obirikorang, K.A.; Appiah-Kubi, R.; Adjei-Boateng, D.; Sekey, W.; Duodu, C.P. Acute hyperthermia and hypoxia tolerance of two improved strains of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Stress Biol. 2023, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. de Verdal, H.; Vandeputte, M.; Mekkawy, W.; Chatain, B.; Benzie, J.A.H. Quantifying the genetic parameters of feed efficiency in juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. BMC Genet. 2018, 19, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. De Verdal, H.; Mekkawy, W.; Lind, C.E.; Vandeputte, M.; Chatain, B.; Benzie, J.A. Measuring individual feed efficiency and its correlations with performance traits in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 2017, 468, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nivelle, R.; Gennotte, V.; Kalala, E.J.K.; Ngoc, N.B.; Muller, M.; Mélard, C.; Rougeot, C. Temperature preference of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) juveniles induces spontaneous sex reversal. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jinagool, P.; Wipassa, V.; Chaiyasing, R.; Chukanhom, K.; Aengwanich, W. Effect of increasing ambient temperature on physiological changes, oxidative stress, nitric oxide, total antioxidant power, and mitochondrial activity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linn.). Aquaculture 2024, 589, 741017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ponzoni, R.W.; Khaw, H.L.; Nguyen, N.H.; Hamzah, A. Inbreeding and effective population size in the Malaysian nucleus of the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2010, 302, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nguyen, N.H.; Hamzah, A.; Thoa, N.P. Effects of Genotype by Environment Interaction on Genetic Gain and Genetic Parameter Estimates in Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nitzan, T.; Kokou, F.; Doron-Faigenboim, A.; Slosman, T.; Biran, J.; Mizrahi, I.; Zak, T.; Benet, A.; Cnaani, A. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Common and Differential Response to Low Temperature Exposure Between Tolerant and Sensitive Blue Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus). Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Qiang, J.; Cui, Y.T.; Tao, F.Y.; Bao, W.J.; He, J.; Li, X.H.; Xu, P.; Sun, L.Y. Physiological response and microRNA expression profiles in head kidney of genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT, Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to acute cold stress. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, L.; Dong, B. Environmental and Genetic Factors Shaping the Global Expansion of Tilapia Aquaculture. Int. J. Aquac. 2025, 15, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liao, P.-C.; Tsai, Y.-L.; Chen, Y.-C.; Wang, P.-C.; Liu, S.-C.; Chen, S.-C. Analysis of streptococcal infection and correlation with climatic factors in cultured tilapia Oreochromis spp. in Taiwan. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. MacKinnon, B.; Debnath, P.P.; Bondad-Reantaso, M.G.; Fridman, S.; Bin, H.; Nekouei, O. Improving tilapia biosecurity through a value chain approach. Rev. Aquac. 2023, 15, 57–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Schmidt, G. Climate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly—We could be in uncharted territory. Nature 2024, 627, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sirimanapong, W.; Phước, N.N.; Crestani, C.; Chen, S.; Zadoks, R.N. Geographical, Temporal and Host-Species Distribution of Potentially Human-Pathogenic Group B Streptococcus in Aquaculture Species in Southeast Asia. Pathogens 2023, 12, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kawasaki, M.; Delamare-Deboutteville, J.; Bowater, R.O.; Walker, M.J.; Beatson, S.; Zakour, N.L.B.; Barnes, A.C. Microevolution of Streptococcus agalactiae ST-261 from Australia Indicates Dissemination via Imported Tilapia and Ongoing Adaptation to Marine Hosts or Environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00859-00818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lannes-Costa, P.S.; Baraúna, R.A.; Ramos, J.N.; Veras, J.F.C.; Conceição, M.V.R.; Vieira, V.V.; de Mattos-Guaraldi, A.L.; Ramos, R.T.J.; Doran, K.S.; Silva, A.; et al. Comparative genomic analysis and identification of pathogenicity islands of hypervirulent ST-17 Streptococcus agalactiae Brazilian strain. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 80, 104195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. He, Y.; Huang, J.-L.; Wang, K.-Y.; Chen, D.-F.; Geng, Y.; Huang, X.-L.; Ou-Yang, P.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Min, J.; et al. Pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae in Oreochromis niloticus. Oncotarget 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sukenda, S.; Suhermanto, A.; Zairin, M., Jr.; Lusiastuti, A.M.; Nuryati, S.; Hidayatullah, D. Virulence gene profiling and pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus farms in Indonesia. Indones. Aquac. J. 2021, 16, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Su, Y.; Liu, C.; Deng, Y.; Cheng, C.; Ma, H.; Guo, Z.; Feng, J. Molecular typing of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates of serotype la from tilapia in southern China. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Alazab, A.; Sadat, A.; Younis, G. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genotyping of Streptococcus agalactiae in Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) in Egypt. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2022, 9, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Duodu, S.; Ayiku, A.N.A.; Adelani, A.A.; Daah, D.A.; Amoako, E.K.; Jansen, M.D.; Cudjoe, K.S. Serotype distribution, virulence and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from cultured tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in Lake Volta, Ghana. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2024, 158, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hsu, C.Y.; Moradkasani, S.; Suliman, M.; Uthirapathy, S.; Zwamel, A.H.; Hjazi, A.; Vashishth, R.; Beig, M. Global patterns of antibiotic resistance in group B Streptococcus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1541524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mohammadi, A.; Amini, C.; Bagheri, P.; Salehi, Z.; Goudarzi, M. Unveiling the genetic landscape of Streptococcus agalactiae bacteremia: Emergence of hypervirulent CC1 strains and new CC283 strains in Tehran, Iran. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Bacteriological culture and serotyping. (A) Inoculation onto 5% sheep blood agar plates in a field laboratory. Bacterial colonies (white arrow); (B) Bacterial colonies with a narrow zone of β-hemolytic on 5% sheep blood agar plates (black arrow); (C) Cultivation on BHI agar yielded pure bacterial colonies 1–2 μm in diameter, grayish-white in color, smooth, shiny, and translucent (black arrow); (D) Gram-positive cocci confirmed from pure colonies (black arrow); (E) Agglutination test for S. agalactiae serotypes Ia, Ib, and III. Agglutination observed only with serotype Ia (black arrow) indicates that the bacterial suspension contains the Ia capsular polysaccharide and therefore belongs to serotype Ia.
Figure 1. Bacteriological culture and serotyping. (A) Inoculation onto 5% sheep blood agar plates in a field laboratory. Bacterial colonies (white arrow); (B) Bacterial colonies with a narrow zone of β-hemolytic on 5% sheep blood agar plates (black arrow); (C) Cultivation on BHI agar yielded pure bacterial colonies 1–2 μm in diameter, grayish-white in color, smooth, shiny, and translucent (black arrow); (D) Gram-positive cocci confirmed from pure colonies (black arrow); (E) Agglutination test for S. agalactiae serotypes Ia, Ib, and III. Agglutination observed only with serotype Ia (black arrow) indicates that the bacterial suspension contains the Ia capsular polysaccharide and therefore belongs to serotype Ia.
Pathogens 15 00545 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates from LAM and reference strains constructed using concatenated sequences of seven MLST housekeeping genes. Sequences were retrieved from the GenBank and PubMLST databases. The Neighbor-Joining tree of 41 S. agalactiae nucleotide sequences shows monophyletic clustering of 25 ST7 CC1 LAM isolates (this study; red box) with Asian and Southeast Asian reference strains (orange box), indicating a single clonal introduction followed by regional dissemination of SaIa ST7. Nine reference isolates of SaIII and SaIb strains from Asia (blue box) and LAM (green box) form distinct basal clades. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap support (%) from 1000 replicates; only values ≥ 70% are shown. Scale bar = 0.0010 substitutions per site. The tree was inferred using Maximum Composite Likelihood distances in MEGA11.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates from LAM and reference strains constructed using concatenated sequences of seven MLST housekeeping genes. Sequences were retrieved from the GenBank and PubMLST databases. The Neighbor-Joining tree of 41 S. agalactiae nucleotide sequences shows monophyletic clustering of 25 ST7 CC1 LAM isolates (this study; red box) with Asian and Southeast Asian reference strains (orange box), indicating a single clonal introduction followed by regional dissemination of SaIa ST7. Nine reference isolates of SaIII and SaIb strains from Asia (blue box) and LAM (green box) form distinct basal clades. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap support (%) from 1000 replicates; only values ≥ 70% are shown. Scale bar = 0.0010 substitutions per site. The tree was inferred using Maximum Composite Likelihood distances in MEGA11.
Pathogens 15 00545 g002
Figure 3. External signs and systemic manifestations in farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Erratic swimming, whirling, and lateral or vertical buoyancy in PGO/GO fish (black arrow); (B) Multiple fecal strings/mucoid fecal casts floating in the water (black arrow); (C) Erratic swimming and turning in fry (red circle) compared to fry with normal swimming behavior (black circle); (D) Bilateral exophthalmos (pop-eyes or bulging eyes), corneal opacity (whitish eyes), and hemorrhage (black arrow); (E) Skin darkening and abdominal distension (red asterisk); (F) hemorrhagic purulent skin ulcers in the perianal region (red circle).
Figure 3. External signs and systemic manifestations in farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Erratic swimming, whirling, and lateral or vertical buoyancy in PGO/GO fish (black arrow); (B) Multiple fecal strings/mucoid fecal casts floating in the water (black arrow); (C) Erratic swimming and turning in fry (red circle) compared to fry with normal swimming behavior (black circle); (D) Bilateral exophthalmos (pop-eyes or bulging eyes), corneal opacity (whitish eyes), and hemorrhage (black arrow); (E) Skin darkening and abdominal distension (red asterisk); (F) hemorrhagic purulent skin ulcers in the perianal region (red circle).
Pathogens 15 00545 g003
Figure 4. Internal macroscopic lesions in farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Thinned intestinal wall with enteritis, serosal hemorrhage, and intestinal intussusception (white asterisk); (B) hemorrhagic areas and infarcts associated with intestinal intussusception (white arrow); (C) congested swim bladder (white arrow) and renomegaly (white asterisk); (D) hepatic hemorrhage and congestion (white arrow).
Figure 4. Internal macroscopic lesions in farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Thinned intestinal wall with enteritis, serosal hemorrhage, and intestinal intussusception (white asterisk); (B) hemorrhagic areas and infarcts associated with intestinal intussusception (white arrow); (C) congested swim bladder (white arrow) and renomegaly (white asterisk); (D) hepatic hemorrhage and congestion (white arrow).
Pathogens 15 00545 g004
Figure 5. Internal macroscopic lesions in farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Meningeal hemorrhage (white arrow); (B) thickening and opacity of the meninges and brain, with accumulation of fibrinopurulent exudate in the brain cavity (black arrow); (C) thickening and opacity of the epicardium/pericardium, with adherent fibrous deposits (whitish-gray fibrin) (white asterisk) and accumulation of fibrinopurulent exudate in the pericardial cavity (white arrow); (D) multiple cavitary foci in skeletal muscle (white arrow), consistent with bacterial abscesses containing bloody, brownish-gray, or yellowish-green fibrinopurulent exudate, melanin, and dystrophic mineralization.
Figure 5. Internal macroscopic lesions in farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Meningeal hemorrhage (white arrow); (B) thickening and opacity of the meninges and brain, with accumulation of fibrinopurulent exudate in the brain cavity (black arrow); (C) thickening and opacity of the epicardium/pericardium, with adherent fibrous deposits (whitish-gray fibrin) (white asterisk) and accumulation of fibrinopurulent exudate in the pericardial cavity (white arrow); (D) multiple cavitary foci in skeletal muscle (white arrow), consistent with bacterial abscesses containing bloody, brownish-gray, or yellowish-green fibrinopurulent exudate, melanin, and dystrophic mineralization.
Pathogens 15 00545 g005
Figure 6. Main microscopic changes in tissues from farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Brain (H&E): thickening of the meninges with mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (B) Brain (H&E): histiocytic perivascular cuffing (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (C) Intestine (H&E): hyperemia and the presence of coccoid bacteria in the vascular lumen of the chorion (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (D) Intestine (Gram): Gram-positive cocci in the submucosa and lamina propria of the villi (blue arrow) (bar = 100 um).
Figure 6. Main microscopic changes in tissues from farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Brain (H&E): thickening of the meninges with mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (B) Brain (H&E): histiocytic perivascular cuffing (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (C) Intestine (H&E): hyperemia and the presence of coccoid bacteria in the vascular lumen of the chorion (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (D) Intestine (Gram): Gram-positive cocci in the submucosa and lamina propria of the villi (blue arrow) (bar = 100 um).
Pathogens 15 00545 g006
Figure 7. Main microscopic changes in tissues from farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Liver (Gram): presence of Gram-positive cocci within vascular lumina and perivascular spaces of the hepatopancreas (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (B) Liver (H&E): vacuolar degeneration in the hepatic parenchyma with the presence of coccoid bacteria within the vascular lumen (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (C) Heart (Gram): thickening of the epicardium with numerous Gram-positive cocci (blue arrow) (bar = 100 um). (D) Spleen (H&E): severe diffuse splenic capillary dilation containing coccoid bacteria (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um).
Figure 7. Main microscopic changes in tissues from farmed tilapia at different production stages in six LAM countries. (A) Liver (Gram): presence of Gram-positive cocci within vascular lumina and perivascular spaces of the hepatopancreas (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (B) Liver (H&E): vacuolar degeneration in the hepatic parenchyma with the presence of coccoid bacteria within the vascular lumen (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um). (C) Heart (Gram): thickening of the epicardium with numerous Gram-positive cocci (blue arrow) (bar = 100 um). (D) Spleen (H&E): severe diffuse splenic capillary dilation containing coccoid bacteria (blue arrow) (bar = 50 um).
Pathogens 15 00545 g007
Table 1. Summary of S. agalactiae isolates recovered from acute outbreaks of a systemic disease in Nile tilapia of different age ranges on different commercial farms in six countries of LAM. Average cumulative mortality rates on each farm during the outbreaks and recorded water temperature ranges are detailed. L: liver; B: brain; I: intestine; S: spleen; K: kidneys; GP: gross pathology; HP: histopathology.
Table 1. Summary of S. agalactiae isolates recovered from acute outbreaks of a systemic disease in Nile tilapia of different age ranges on different commercial farms in six countries of LAM. Average cumulative mortality rates on each farm during the outbreaks and recorded water temperature ranges are detailed. L: liver; B: brain; I: intestine; S: spleen; K: kidneys; GP: gross pathology; HP: histopathology.
RegionCountryDateStageN° Fish GP/
N° Fish HP
Weight (g)OrgansMain ChangeN° Isolates (ID)Water
Temperature (°C)
Cumulative Mortality (%)
CAMC1July
2023
FRY60/065.0Organs poolWhirling, mortalityC1–A132–33 °C48%
FRY5.0C1–A2
PGO20/0730.0IIntussusceptionC1–A3>32 °C55%
PGO50.0B, L, KHemorrhagic septicemiaC1–A4
GO10/06600.0L, K, IHemorrhagic septicemia; intussusceptionC1–A5
C2April
2023
FRY60/062.0Organs poolWhirling, mortalityC2–A132–34 °C52%
FRY2.0C2–A2
PGO20/0710.0IIntussusceptionC2–A3>32 °C57%
PGO30.0B, L, KHemorrhagic septicemiaC2–A4
GO10/06400.0B, K, IHemorrhagic septicemia; intussusceptionC2–A5
SAMC3April
2025
PGO10/05150.0L, S, BHemorrhagic septicemia; intussusceptionC3–A1>32 °C55%
GO20/06180.0C3–A2
GO300.0C3–A3
C4November 2023FRY60/063.0Organs poolWhirling, mortalityC4–A132–34 °C50%
FRY3.0C4–A2
PGO20/0740.0B, LHemorrhagic septicemia; intussusceptionC4–A3>32 °C47%
PGO60.0C4–A4
GO10/06500.0Hemorrhagic septicemiaC4–A5
C5April
2025
PGO10/05100.0B, L, SHemorrhagic septicemiaC5–A1>32 °C50%
GO10/05400.0C5–A2
NAMC6August 2021PGO20/0730.0B, K, IHemorrhagic septicemiaC6–A1>32 °C54%
PGO80.0C6–A2
PGO90.0C6–A3
GO20/07500.0C6–A4
GO800.0C6–A5
Table 2. Frequency of clinical and pathological findings in farmed tilapia at different age ranges and production stages in six LAM countries.
Table 2. Frequency of clinical and pathological findings in farmed tilapia at different age ranges and production stages in six LAM countries.
Clinical and Pathological FindingsFRY
(<5 g; n = 180)
PGO/GO
(≥5 g; n = 180)
Clinical signs
Loss of appetite or anorexia75.0%86.7%
Lethargy and dying individuals on shores83.9%79.4%
Erratic swimming behavior, spiraling or uncoordinated movements, loss of buoyancy control81.7%87.8%
Abdominal distension21.7%68.3%
C-shaped spinal curvature15.6%24.4%
Fecal strings (protruded from the anus and/or in varying quantities in the water)9.4%25.6%
External inspection
Head and eyes
Unilateral or bilateral exophthalmos (pop-eyes)0.0%73.9%
Corneal opacity (whitish or opaque eyes)9.4%71.7%
Bleeding in the eyes7.2%25.6%
Abscesses in the jaw or head region0.0%14.4%
Skin and fins
Hemorrhages at the base of the fins and tail0.0%22.8%
Hemorrhagic purulent skin ulcers in the perianal region0.0%20.6%
Fin erosion12.8%34.3%
Skin darkening18.9%66.1%
Petechiae on body surface and operculum10.6%24.4%
Gills
Gill pallor17.2%31.7%
Whitish areas on the gill surface6.1%37.7%
Internal inspection
Coelomic cavity
Serosanguineous ascites21.1%51.7%
Multiple abdominal adhesions0.0%37.8%
Purulent-appearing material0.0%15.6%
Heart
Pericarditis or whitish discoloration of the heart0.0%62.2%
Presence of purulent material in the pericardial sac and/or epicardium0.0%67.8%
Brain cavity
Cerebral edema18.3%68.3%
Cerebral hemorrhage20.6%66.1%
Presence of yellowish purulent material and meningeal opacity22.8%62.8%
Stomach and Intestines
Hemorrhage and congestion74.4%81.1%
Intussusception43.3%17.2%
Hepatopancreas
Irregular appearance and coloration, with pale and congested areas12.8%74.4%
Fibrinous adhesions0.0%18.3%
Abscesses0.0%11.7%
Spleen
Splenomegaly9.4%57.8%
Presence of pale areas0.0%9.4%
Kidneys and swim bladder
Renomegaly0.0%7.2%
Pallor0.0%63.9%
Gas accumulation in the swim bladder and congestion18.3%53.3%
Skeletal muscle
Abscesses (calcified or not)0.0%15.6%
Table 3. Description of virulence genes and virulence gene profiles among the 25 SaIa isolates recovered from six LAM countries (arbitrarily named in this study as A, B, and C).
Table 3. Description of virulence genes and virulence gene profiles among the 25 SaIa isolates recovered from six LAM countries (arbitrarily named in this study as A, B, and C).
GeneProductMain functionC1
(n = 5)
C2
(n = 5)
C3
(n = 3)
C4
(n = 5)
C5
(n = 2)
C6
(n = 5)
Total
(n = 25)
spb1Spb1 surface proteinInvasion of epithelial cells++++++100%
bcaαC protein (α antigen)Adherence, invasion, resistance to phagocytosis++++++100%
cfbCAMP factorPore-forming cytolysin++++++100%
dltRD-alanine regulatorResistance to antimicrobial peptides++++++100%
bacβC protein (β antigen)IgA binding, factor H; immune evasion++++60%
sodASuperoxide dismutase AProtection against oxidative stress100%
scpBC5a peptidaseEvasion of neutrophil recruitment100%
Virulence gene profile (n = 25)ABAAAB
Presence (+) and absence (−) of the gene.
Table 4. Comparative characterization of ARG detection, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and MIC values for OTC, FFC, AMX, and ENR in SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates recovered from Nile tilapia in six Latin American countries.
Table 4. Comparative characterization of ARG detection, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and MIC values for OTC, FFC, AMX, and ENR in SaIa ST7 CC1 isolates recovered from Nile tilapia in six Latin American countries.
RegionCountryBacterial IDARGsOTCFFCAMXENR
tetMtetOmmμm/mLmmμm/mLmmμm/mLmmμm/mL
CAMC1C1–A1 S (30)0.5S (30)0.5S (35)≤0.5I (25)4.0
C1–A2 S (30)0.5S (34)0.5S (34)≤0.5I (25)4.0
C1–A3 S (30)0.5S (30)0.5S (32)≤0.5I (25)4.0
C1–A4 S (30)0.5S (30)0.5S (30)≤0.5I (25)4.0
C1–A5+ I (26)1.0S (30)0.5S (30)≤0.5I (24)4.0
C2C2–A1 +I (22)4.0S (32)1.0S (35)≤0.5I (23)4.0
C2–A2 +I (21)4.0S (31)2.0S (36)≤0.5I (23)4.0
C2–A3 I (28)4.0S (36)1.0S (40)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C2–A4 I (21)4.0S (33)2.0S (38)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C2–A5 I (21)4.0S (32)1.0S (35)≤0.5I (24)4.0
SAMC3C3–A1+ I (28)4.0S (35)1.0S (46)≤0.5I (22)4.0
C3–A2+ I (28)4.0S (36)<0.5S (40)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C3–A3 I (27)2.0S (36)1.0S (41)≤0.5I (22)4.0
C4C4–A1 I (23)2.0S (30)1.0S (35)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C4–A2 I (25)2.0S (30)2.0S (35)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C4–A3 I (23)1.0S (30)1.0S (34)≤0.5I (23)4.0
C4–A4 I (24)2.0S (31)1.0S (35)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C4–A5 I (24)1.0S (30)1.0S (33)≤0.5I (21)4.0
C5C5–A1 S (30)0.5S (31)1.0S (40)≤0.5I (25)4.0
C5–A2 S (30)0.5S (33)1.0S (41)≤0.5I (23)4.0
NAMC6C6–A1 I (26)2.0S (31)1.0S (39)≤0.5I (26)4.0
C6–A2 I (27)2.0S (31)1.0S (36)≤0.5I (24)4.0
C6–A3 I (26)4S (30)2.0S (34)≤0.5I (23)4.0
C6–A4 I (25)2S (31)1.0S (35)≤0.5I (23)4.0
C6–A5 I (24)2S (32)1.0S (46)≤0.5I (24)4.0
Presence (+) of the gene.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rozas-Serri, M.; Fernandez-Alarcon, M.; Miyoko-Natori, M.; Galetti, R.; Harakava, R.; Cardoso-Guimarães, M.; Ildefonso, R. Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype Ia ST7 CC1 in Farmed Nile Tilapia in Latin America: Age-Dependent Disease Expression and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of an Emerging Clonal Lineage. Pathogens 2026, 15, 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050545

AMA Style

Rozas-Serri M, Fernandez-Alarcon M, Miyoko-Natori M, Galetti R, Harakava R, Cardoso-Guimarães M, Ildefonso R. Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype Ia ST7 CC1 in Farmed Nile Tilapia in Latin America: Age-Dependent Disease Expression and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of an Emerging Clonal Lineage. Pathogens. 2026; 15(5):545. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rozas-Serri, Marco, Miguel Fernandez-Alarcon, Mariene Miyoko-Natori, Renata Galetti, Ricardo Harakava, Mateus Cardoso-Guimarães, and Ricardo Ildefonso. 2026. "Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype Ia ST7 CC1 in Farmed Nile Tilapia in Latin America: Age-Dependent Disease Expression and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of an Emerging Clonal Lineage" Pathogens 15, no. 5: 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050545

APA Style

Rozas-Serri, M., Fernandez-Alarcon, M., Miyoko-Natori, M., Galetti, R., Harakava, R., Cardoso-Guimarães, M., & Ildefonso, R. (2026). Streptococcus agalactiae Serotype Ia ST7 CC1 in Farmed Nile Tilapia in Latin America: Age-Dependent Disease Expression and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of an Emerging Clonal Lineage. Pathogens, 15(5), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15050545

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop