Next Article in Journal
Blocking Serum Amyloid-P Component from Binding to Macrophages and Augmenting Fungal Functional Amyloid Increases Macrophage Phagocytosis of Candida albicans
Next Article in Special Issue
Fungal Endophytes Isolated from Elymus repens, a Wild Relative of Barley, Have Potential for Biological Control of Fusarium culmorum and Pyrenophora teres in Barley
Previous Article in Journal
NcGRA7 and NcROP40 Play a Role in the Virulence of Neospora caninum in a Pregnant Mouse Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fusarium oxysporum Associated with Fusarium Wilt on Pennisetum sinese in China

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 404100, China
2
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Herbivore Science, Chongqing 404100, China
3
Chongqing Beef Engineering Technology Research Center, Chongqing 404100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(9), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11090999
Submission received: 20 August 2022 / Revised: 27 August 2022 / Accepted: 28 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Pathogenic Fungi)

Abstract

:
Pennisetum sinese, a versatile and adaptable plant, plays an essential role in phytoremediation, soil reclamation, and fodder production. From 2018 to 2021, the occurrence of Fusarium wilt, with symptoms of foliar blight and internal discoloration of the stem, was observed in Chongqing, China. Pathogens were isolated from the symptomatic leaves. Based on morphological characteristics as well as DNA sequences of the 18S ribosomal RNA (SSU), translation elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α), RNA polymerase II subunit 1 (rpb1), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes, the causal agents were identified as Fusarium oxysporum. Phylogenetic analysis of the combined dataset of EF1-α, rpb1 and rpb2 showed that pathogenic isolates clustered with F. oxysporum strains. The pathogen was reisolated from inoculated and diseased tissues; thus, Koch’s postulates were fulfilled. This is the first report of F. oxysporum causing Fusarium wilt on P. sinese in China and worldwide.

1. Introduction

Pennisetum sinese (syn. Cenchrus flaccidus), a cross between Pennisetum purpureum and Pennisetum americanum [1], is extensively distributed in tropical and subtropical regions as a Gramineae perennial tall grass [2]. With high biomass production and rich protein and carbohydrates [3], P. sinese has been widely cultivated as silage forages, edible fungi culture medium, and shows a valuable potential for biomass energy [4]. Furthermore, P. sinese has strong adaptability, which enables its rapid growth in arid environments and contributes to its prominent role in phytoremediation and ecological restoration [5].
As one of the most critical soil-borne pathogens, Fusarium species limit plant growth and crop yield [6], and spawn massive agricultural financial losses worldwide [7]. For instance, Fusarium graminearum, F. culmorum, and F. avenaceum can infest Triticum aestivum and induce wheat scab. It is commonly found in wheat-producing regions throughout the northwest, southwest, middle, and southeast of China, severely reducing production [8]. Fusarium spp. produce carcinogenic mycotoxin that poses a threat to food security and human health [9]. In addition, Fusarium phytotoxicity is regarded as a relevant factor in plant disease severity and progression [10].
Pennisetum diseases are known to be induced by fungal species in genera, such as Curvularia, Tolyposporium, Puccinia, Colletotrichum, and Bipolaris, which lead to the main deterioration factors during cultivation and storage. In China, P. sinese production is particularly plagued by leaf blight issues due to being attacked by Gram-negative bacteria members Pantoea agglomerans in Chongqing [11] and fungi species Pyricularia pennisetigena in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province [12]. The initial infection manifests as water-soaked brown spots and ultimately the whole leaf blast, consequently affecting the quantity and quality of the herbage.
In May 2018, foliar blight and stem wilt were first observed in the P. sinese field in Chongqing City, China, which may potentially harm forage yield. Our study aims to describe this new P. sinese wilting disease and identify the causal agent. We confirmed the pathogen associated with P. sinese Fusarium wilt through morphological observation, molecular identification, and pathogenicity tests. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Fusarium wilt on P. sinese caused by F. oxysporum in China and worldwide. Our research will establish the groundwork for primary prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Fusarium wilt diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Disease Incidence and Sampling Collection

Every May, field surveys were carried out in the 400 m2 P. sinese fields from 2018 to 2021. The planting base was located at Southwest University (29°22′ N, 105°33′ E), Rongchang District, Chongqing City, China. Typical symptoms of wilting P. sinese were recorded from all infected plants. The disease incidence was calculated according to the formula described by Zainudin et al. [13] Seven P. sinese fields were randomly selected, and five plots (20 m2) were investigated at every site. Approximately 70 plants per plot were included in the analysis. A total of 35 diseased plants were collected and brought to the laboratory.

2.2. Fungal Isolation and Morphological Observation

Infected leaf and stem samples were cut into 5–8 mm2 pieces, then flashed with running tap water. The symptomatic fragments were immersed in 75% ethanol (v/v) for 30 s, 1% NaClO (w/v) for 10 s, and rinsed with sterile distilled water three times. Symptomatic tissues were then transferred onto 9-cm-diameter potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated in a biochemical incubator (Boxun BSP100, Shanghai, China) at 25 °C in the dark. Pure cultures of each isolate were obtained by subcultivating hyphal tips on PDA. Fungal colony characteristics were observed on PDA for 5–7 days. After the 10-day-inoculation, the shapes and sizes of the conidia were recorded from at least 100 conidia per isolate under a microscope (Nikon Eclipse E200, Shanghai, China).

2.3. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis

Eight representative F. oxysporum strains isolated in different years were sequenced. Mycelia were scraped from 14-day-old colonies and genomic DNA was extracted according to the instructions of the PlantGen DNA Kit CW0553A (Cwbio, Taizhou, China).
Amplification reactions were carried out in a total volume of 50 μL, containing 2 μL of template DNA, 1 μL of each forward and reverse PCR primer, 21 μL of ultrapure water, and 25 μL of 2 × PCR Taq Master Mix PC1120 (Solarbio, Beijing, China), which included 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 250 μM dNTP, and 0.05 U Polymerease/μL. The 18S ribosomal RNA (SSU), translation elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α), RNA polymerase II subunit 1 (rpb1), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes were amplified with primers NS1/fung [14], EF1-728F/EF-2 [15], RPB1-Fa/RPB1-G2R and RPB2-5f2/RPB2-7cr [16], respectively. The Applied Biosystems ProFlex PCR 4484075 was used for the amplification with the following conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 40 s, annealing at 47 °C for 40 s, and extension at 72 °C for 150 s, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min.
PCR products were detected by 1% agarose gel in 1 × TBE buffer stained with Ethidium Bromide (Thermo Fisher 15585011, Shanghai, China) using a Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis (Thermo Fisher PSC120M, Shanghai, China), and visualized under UVP Glestudio plus (Analytik Jena, Shanghai, China), then sent to GENEWIZ, Inc. (Suzhou, China) for Sanger sequencing. Results of genome sequencing were manually edited using the software Chromas (v 2.6.6, Technelysium Pty, Ltd., Brisbane, Australia). Sequence similarity searches were analyzed by BLAST in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The obtained sequences and reference ones retrieved from NCBI GenBank were aligned by ClustalW. The maximum-likelihood tree was constructed on the three-gene (EF-1α + rpb1 + rpb2) combined datasets. Phylogenetic analysis was generated based on the general time reversible model using MEGA 7 software, and branch strength was evaluated with 1000 replicates.

2.4. Pathogenicity Test

Pathogenicity assays were carried out in triplicate for eight F. oxysporum isolates. For in vivo experiment, stems of 6-week-old healthy P. sinese seedlings, which had been wounded by sterile needles, were dipped in a spore suspension of approximately 105 conidia/mL for 30 min, while the negative control was treated with distilled water. All plants grew in sterilized soil and were placed in a greenhouse at 24 ± 1 °C with a 12 h/12 h light and dark period. The in vitro test was conducted in the petri dish, which had been previously washed with 75% alcohol and padded with autoclaved filter paper moistened with sterilized distilled water to keep wet. Leaves were separated from P. sinese, wounded, and inoculated as previously described. Culture dishes were placed in the biochemical incubator. The temperature parameter was adjusted to 25 °C and the illumination condition was set to 24 h dark. Fungal pathogens were reisolated from symptomatic tissues of the infected plants and identified on the basis of cultural characteristics and molecular analysis to fulfill Koch’s postulates.

3. Results

3.1. Field Survey

All infected P. sinese showed typical symptoms as irregular deep reddish-brown lesions appearing on the blade tip; as the disease became worse, the whole leaf turned pale brown, then blighted, and the internal part of the stem gradually discolored. The infected plants dried out and defoliated at a severe stage. In 2018, the disease incidence was determined in the range of 54–71%, and the average among seven fields was calculated as 63%. The average disease incidence was recorded as 49%, 57%, and 52% in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively.

3.2. Morphological Identification

A total of 38 isolates of Fusarium were obtained from symptomatic samples. The colonies covered almost the whole petri dish in 6 days at 25 °C. Aerial mycelia were abundant, white, and floccose initially. After 3 days of inoculation, yellow–orange pigmentation developed beneath the colonies.
Microconidia were single-celled, ellipsoidal, 0–1 septate, 5–14 × 2.5–4.5 µm. Macroconidia were falcate, curved towards the ventral side, with apical cells papillate, basal cells foot-shaped, 1–4 septate (mostly 3 septate), hyaline, smooth, and thin-walled, 21–42 × 3–6 µm. Chlamydospores were globose to sub-globose with an average of 10 μm in diameter, and hyphae branched at acute angles (Figure 1). The observed morphological characteristics matched the descriptions of F. oxysporum [17].

3.3. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis

BLAST results showed that the SSU, EF-1α, rpb1, and rpb2 sequences of eight isolates attained 97–100% identity to the corresponding sequences of F. oxysporum strain T1-BH.1 (MN463097), FS11719a (MN417191), GR_FOA249 (MT305083), and VPRI43194 (MN457545). Nucleotide sequences of eight strains were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
A multilocus phylogenetic tree was constructed using the combined sequences of EF-1α, rpb1 and rpb2 (Table 2). There were a total of 1932 positions in the final dataset. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−7778.70) is displayed in Figure 2. Bootstrap values were indicated at the nodes. In the maximum-likelihood tree, eight isolates were grouped into an independent clade, supported by the 100% bootstrap value. The combined three-locus dataset revealed that eight pathogenic isolates clustered strongly (100%) with F. oxysporum strains. Thus, based on morphology and sequence analysis, the associated fungus was determined as F. oxysporum.

3.4. Pathogenicity Test

The pathogenicity test showed F. oxysporum isolates were pathogenic to P. sinese, exhibiting typical symptoms as observed in the field. In the in vitro assay, the detached leaves became yellow–brown and eventually blighted after 7 days of inoculation with the spore suspension. The in vivo experiment demonstrated that reddish-brown regions formed at the apex of inoculated leaves. As the disease progressed, light brown areas began to emerge in the center of the expanding red–brown lesion and spread to the entire leaf. Plants treated with pathogenic inoculums all turned wilted, and their stems revealed vascular bundle browning 25 days later. The control groups did not develop any symptoms (Figure 3). The same fungal species (F. oxysporum) was successfully reisolated from symptomatic tissues, fulfilling Koch’s postulates.

4. Discussion

F. oxysporum is a type of common soilborne fungi, which leads to vascular wilt and crown, stem, or root rot across a broad host range [18], including Canary Island date palm Fusarium wilt (Phoenix canariensis Hort. Ex Chabaud) [19], sweet basil wilt and crown rot [20], potato stem–end rot [21] and sugar beet lines root rot [22]. This fungus is also a considerable pathogen (clinically) that can infect both humans and animals [23].
Morphological observation provides clues to the pathogen’s identity as Fusarium spp. However, morphological features are not sufficient to distinguish many fusaria [24], and multi-locus sequence comparisons were proposed because they offer more credible information. The EF1-α sequence is extensively used to identify most Fusarium species [25]. In addition, combining portions of rpb1 and rpb2 is the most comprehensive phylogenetic assessment of Fusarium spp. as yet [6], receiving recognition for their high informativeness in analyzing Fusarium [26]. Thus, a phylogenetic tree was conducted consisting of concatenated partial sequences of genes for EF1-α, rpb1 and rpb2, which strongly verified that the associated pathogen was F. oxysporum.
When it comes to Fusarium wilt, F. oxysporum can colonize in the vascular bundles of the plant roots, resulting in vessel blockage, withering of the above-ground portion, along with brown necrotic spots appearing on the root epidermis [27,28,29]. Diseased crops exhibit root rot symptoms or even die. Our present work revealed that P. sinese was susceptible to Fusarium wilt; additionally, stem discoloration also provided evidence of vascular bundle infection.
As Pennisetum spp. is one of the most widely cultivated plants around the world [30], Fusarium wilt disease could cause a serious impact on forage. Located in Southwest China and the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, Chongqing enjoys a subtropical monsoon climate with four distinct seasons and abundant rainfall, leading to high pastures production. Since P. sinese is a primarily cultivated forage in China in the summer [31], growers of P. sinese should pay emphasis to P. sinese wilting. The identification of the causal pathogen provides a scientific basis for disease management, playing a major part in developing antifungal agents. For further research, management strategies will be investigated to minimize potential economic losses due to lower plant biomass production.

Author Contributions

J.Z.: investigation, conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing—original draft. L.W.: investigation, data curation, writing—review and editing. W.H.: methodology, data curation, writing—review and editing. Y.H.: resources, validation, writing—editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901929), Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (cstc2021jcyj-msxmX1021) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2020B015).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data generated in this study are deposited in NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank). All accession numbers are presented in Table 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, Q.; Tang, L.; Wang, S.; Huang, B.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X. An investigation on the characteristics of cellulose nanocrystals from Pennisetum sinese. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 70, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, J.; Yuan, X.; Desta, S.T.; Dong, Z.; Mugabe, W.; Shao, T. Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis JF85 and Enterococcus faecium Y83 isolated from Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens) for ensiling Pennisetum sinese. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 257, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tian, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, K.; Wang, G.; Xia, Y.; Yu, E.; Li, Z.; Gong, W.; Xie, J. Dietary Pennisetum sinese Roxb meal reduces lipid accumulation and alleviates enteritis in juvenile grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, X.; Tong, J.; Su, Y.; Xiao, L. Pennisetum sinese: A potential phytoremediation plant for chromium deletion from soil. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, Y.; Lu, L.; Peng, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, R.; Zhou, C. High-yield grass Pennisetum sinese Roxb plantation and organic manure alter bacterial and fungal communities structure in an ecological agriculture farm. AMB Express 2020, 10, 86. [Google Scholar]
  6. O’Donnell, K.; Rooney, A.P.; Proctor, R.H.; Brown, D.W.; McCormick, S.P.; Ward, T.J.; Frandsen, R.J.N.; Lysoe, E.; Rehner, S.A.; Aoki, T.; et al. Phylogenetic analyses of RPB1 and RPB2 support a middle Cretaceous origin for a clade comprising all agriculturally and medically important fusaria. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013, 52, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, F. Measuring the economic impacts of Fusarium toxins in animal feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 137, 363–374. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, J.C.; Fang, X.L.; Nan, Z.B. Types and effects of toxins produced by plant pathogenic fungi Fusarium. Pratacultural Sci. 2021, 38, 1513–1524. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, D.C.; Grant, G.B.; O’Donnell, K.; Wannemuehler, K.A.; Noble-Wang, J.; Rao, C.Y.; Jacobson, L.M.; Crowell, C.S.; Sneed, R.S.; Lewis, F.M.T.; et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. Jama-J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2006, 296, 953–963. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wipfler, R.; Mccormick, S.P.; Proctor, R.; Teresi, J.; Hao, G.X.; Ward, T.; Alexander, N.; Vaughan, M.M. Synergistic phytotoxic effects of culmorin and trichothecene mycotoxins. Toxins 2019, 11, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Han, Y.; Fan, Z.; Yao, Y.; Su, Y.; Gu, X.; Liu, A. First report of leaf blight disease on Pennisetum sinese in China caused by Pantoea agglomerans. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yi, R.; Huang, Y.; Pang, R. Leaf blast, a new disease on Pennisetum sinese caused by Pyricularia pennisetigena in China. Plant Dis. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zainudin, A.A.R.N.I.; Salleh, B. Bakanae disease of rice in Malaysia and Indonesia: Etiology of the causal agent based on morphological, physiological and pathogenicity characteristics. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2008, 48, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maza-Marquez, P.; Vilchez-Vargas, R.; Gonzalez-Martinez, A.; Gonzalez-Lopez, J.; Rodelas, B. Assessing the abundance of fungal populations in a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating urban wastewater by using quantitative PCR (qPCR). J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 223, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Donnell, K.; Kistler, H.C.; Cigelnik, E.; Ploetz, R.C. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: Concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 2044–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. O’Donnell, K.; Sutton, D.A.; Rinaldi, M.G.; Sarver, B.A.J.; Balajee, S.A.; Schroers, H.J.; Summerbell, R.C.; Robert, V.A.R.G.; Crous, P.W.; Zhang, N.; et al. Internet-Accessible DNA sequence database for identifying fusaria from human and animal infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3708–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lombard, L.; Sandoval-Denis, M.; Lamprecht, S.C.; Crous, P.W. Epitypification of Fusarium oxysporum—Clearing the taxonomic chaos. Persoonia 2019, 43, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Webb, K.M.; Covey, P.; Kuwitzky, B.; Hanson, M. Multilocus analysis using putative fungal effectors to describe a population of Fusarium oxysporum from sugar beet. Phytopathology 2014, 104, 128. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lan, C.Z.; Dai, Y.L.; Gan, L.; Yao, J.A.; Yang, X.J. First report of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. canariensis causing Fusarium wilt on Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis Hort. Ex Chabaud) in China. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 102, 569–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Swart, L.; van Niekerk, J.M. First record of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp basilici occurring on sweet basil in South Africa. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2003, 32, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aktaruzzaman, M.; Xu, S.; Kim, J.; Woo, J.; Hahm, Y.; Kim, B. First report of potato stem-end rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum in Korea. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hanson, L.; de Lucchi, C.; Stevanato, P.; McGrath, M.; Panella, L.; Sella, L.; de Biaggi, M.; Concheri, G. Root rot symptoms in sugar beet lines caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp betae. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 150, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Laurence, M.H.; Summerell, B.A.; Burgess, L.W.; Liew, E.C.Y. Genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition in the Fusarium oxysporum species complex. Fungal Biol. 2014, 118, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Husna, A.; Zakaria, L.; Mohamed Nor, N.M.I. Fusarium commune associated with wilt and root rot disease in rice. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Geiser, D.M.; Jimenez-Gasco, M.D.; Kang, S.C.; Makalowska, I.; Veeraraghavan, N.; Ward, T.J.; Zhang, N.; Kuldau, G.A.; O’Donnell, K. FUSARIUM-ID v. 1.0: A DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Villafana, R.T.; Rampersad, S.N. Three-Locus sequence identification and differential tebuconazole sensitivity suggest novel Fusarium equiseti haplotype from Trinidad. Pathogens 2020, 9, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Michielse, C.B.; Rep, M. Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009, 10, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thatcher, L.F.; Gao, L.L.; Singh, K.B. Jasmonate Signalling and Defence Responses in the Model Legume Medicago truncatula—A Focus on Responses to Fusarium Wilt Disease. Plants 2016, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, L.; Zheng, L.; Pan, L.; Hsiang, T.; Huang, J. Identification and characterization of Fusarium species associated with wilt of Eleocharis dulcis (Chinese water chestnut) in China. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xu, J.; Liu, C.; Song, Y.; Li, M.F. Comparative analysis of the chloroplast genome for four Pennisetum species: Molecular structure and phylogenetic relationships. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 687844. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu, G.C.; Xu, H.; Yu, Y.X.; Jiang, C.D. Effects of different additives and densities on silage quality of hybrid Pennisetum. Pratacultural Sci. 2021, 38, 2191–2199. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of the pathogen on PDA medium. (a,b). The back and front of the colony; (c) microconidia; (d) hyphae with acute angled branch; (e) thick-walled chlamydospores; (f) monophialides producing macroconidia; (g) falcate-shaped macroconidia. Scale bars in (cg) = 10 μm.
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of the pathogen on PDA medium. (a,b). The back and front of the colony; (c) microconidia; (d) hyphae with acute angled branch; (e) thick-walled chlamydospores; (f) monophialides producing macroconidia; (g) falcate-shaped macroconidia. Scale bars in (cg) = 10 μm.
Pathogens 11 00999 g001
Figure 2. The maximum-likelihood tree was inferred from the concatenated sequences of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α), RNA polymerase II subunit 1 (rpb1), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes. The scale bar represented 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Figure 2. The maximum-likelihood tree was inferred from the concatenated sequences of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α), RNA polymerase II subunit 1 (rpb1), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes. The scale bar represented 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Pathogens 11 00999 g002
Figure 3. Symptoms of Fusarium wilt on Pennisetum sinese. (a) Typical symptoms on naturally infected P. sinese in the field; (b,c) stem discoloration on naturally infected P. sinese; (d) the detached leaf inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum isolate turned yellow–brown and withered; (e) the stem inoculated with F. oxysporum showed vascular bundle browning; (f,g) the control group stayed healthy; (h,i) the reddish-brown lesion appeared on leaves and infected leaves gradually wilted.
Figure 3. Symptoms of Fusarium wilt on Pennisetum sinese. (a) Typical symptoms on naturally infected P. sinese in the field; (b,c) stem discoloration on naturally infected P. sinese; (d) the detached leaf inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum isolate turned yellow–brown and withered; (e) the stem inoculated with F. oxysporum showed vascular bundle browning; (f,g) the control group stayed healthy; (h,i) the reddish-brown lesion appeared on leaves and infected leaves gradually wilted.
Pathogens 11 00999 g003
Table 1. Isolates of Fusarium oxysporum obtained from Pennisetum sinese Fusarium wilt from 2018 to 2021 in China and GenBank accession numbers for DNA sequences used in this study.
Table 1. Isolates of Fusarium oxysporum obtained from Pennisetum sinese Fusarium wilt from 2018 to 2021 in China and GenBank accession numbers for DNA sequences used in this study.
IsolateYearGenBank Accession Number
SSUEFrpb1rpb2
PSFO12018MN954685MN939683MT314258MT314259
PSFO22018OP236575OP243441OP243434OP243427
PSFO32019OP236576OP243442OP243435OP243428
PSFO42019OP236577OP243443OP243436OP243429
PSFO52020OP236578OP243444OP243437OP243430
PSFO62020OP236579OP243445OP243438OP243431
PSFO72021OP236580OP243446OP243439OP243432
PSFO82021OP236581OP243447OP243440OP243433
Table 2. Isolates of Fusarium spp. and GenBank accession numbers for DNA sequences used in this study.
Table 2. Isolates of Fusarium spp. and GenBank accession numbers for DNA sequences used in this study.
Fusarium SpeciesIsolateGenBank Accession Number
EF-1αrpb1rpb2
F. oxysporumGR_FOAcMT305183MT305069MT305125
F. oxysporumGR_FOA247MT305196MT305082MT305138
F. oxysporumNA_FOA14MT568939MT568955MT568971
F. oxysporumMA_FOA25MT568947MT568963MT568979
F. proliferatumMA_FPA10MW091270MW091290MW091308
F. redolensNA_FRA02MW091278MW091296MW091316
F. dimerumNRRL 36140HM347133HM347203HM347218
F. mangiferaeUMAF_0924KP753402KP753435KP753442
F. aywerteRBG 5743KP083250KP083273KP083278
F. communeNRRL 28387AF246832JX171525JX171638
F. bulbicolaNRRL 13618KF466415KF466394KF466404
F. globosumNRRL 26131KF466417KF466396KF466406
F. sacchariNRRL 13999AF160278JX171466JX171580
F. konzumCBS: 119849LT996098LT996200LT996148
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, J.; Wang, L.; Hou, W.; Han, Y. Fusarium oxysporum Associated with Fusarium Wilt on Pennisetum sinese in China. Pathogens 2022, 11, 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11090999

AMA Style

Zheng J, Wang L, Hou W, Han Y. Fusarium oxysporum Associated with Fusarium Wilt on Pennisetum sinese in China. Pathogens. 2022; 11(9):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11090999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Jiaqi, Liyao Wang, Wenchao Hou, and Yuzhu Han. 2022. "Fusarium oxysporum Associated with Fusarium Wilt on Pennisetum sinese in China" Pathogens 11, no. 9: 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11090999

APA Style

Zheng, J., Wang, L., Hou, W., & Han, Y. (2022). Fusarium oxysporum Associated with Fusarium Wilt on Pennisetum sinese in China. Pathogens, 11(9), 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11090999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop