Next Article in Journal
Ascription, Achievement, and Perceived Equity of Educational Regimes: An Empirical Investigation
Next Article in Special Issue
The New Eugenics: Black Hyper-Incarceration and Human Abatement
Previous Article in Journal
Turning Points in the Lives of Chinese and Indian Women Leaders Working toward Social Justice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Population Growth, Migration, and Changes in the Racial Differential in Imprisonment in the United States, 1940–1980
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2016, 5(4), 61;

Banishment in Public Housing: Testing an Evolution of Broken Windows

Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
Department of Behavioral Sciences, City University of New York, York College, Jamaica, NY 11451, USA
Department of Sociology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Bryan L. Sykes
Received: 9 June 2016 / Revised: 27 September 2016 / Accepted: 8 October 2016 / Published: 14 October 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [2443 KB, uploaded 14 October 2016]   |  


Banishment policies grant police the authority to formally ban individuals from entering public housing and arrest them for trespassing if they violate the ban. Despite its widespread use and the social consequences resulting from it, an empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of banishment has not been performed. Understanding banishment enforcement is an evolution of broken windows policing, this study explores how effective bans are at reducing crime in public housing. We analyze crime data, spanning the years 2001–2012, from six public housing communities and 13 surrounding communities in one southeastern U.S. city. Using Arellano-Bond dynamic panel models, we investigate whether or not issuing bans predicts reductions in property and violent crimes as well as increases in drug and trespass arrests in public housing. We find that this brand of broken windows policing does reduce crime, albeit relatively small reductions and only for property crime, while resulting in an increase in trespass arrests. Given our findings that these policies have only a modest impact on property crime, yet produce relatively larger increases in arrests for minor offenses in communities of color, and ultimately have no significant impact on violent crime, it will be important for police, communities, and policy makers to discuss whether the returns are worth the potential costs. View Full-Text
Keywords: broken windows; banishment; public housing; crime; policing broken windows; banishment; public housing; crime; policing

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Torres, J.; Apkarian, J.; Hawdon, J. Banishment in Public Housing: Testing an Evolution of Broken Windows. Soc. Sci. 2016, 5, 61.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top