Next Article in Journal
Angry and Alone: Demographic Characteristics of Those Who Post to Online Comment Sections
Next Article in Special Issue
The Militarization of Mass Incapacitation and Torture during the Sunni Insurgency and American Occupation of Iraq
Previous Article in Journal
Postcolonial Reflection on the Christian Mission: The Case of North Korean Refugees in China and South Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Banishment in Public Housing: Testing an Evolution of Broken Windows
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

The New Eugenics: Black Hyper-Incarceration and Human Abatement

Department of Sociology, The University of Auckland, Level 9, HSB Building, 10 Symonds Street, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Academic Editor: Bryan L. Sykes
Soc. Sci. 2016, 5(4), 66;
Received: 14 June 2016 / Revised: 17 October 2016 / Accepted: 20 October 2016 / Published: 25 October 2016
In the early twentieth century, the eugenics movement exercised considerable influence over domestic US public policy. Positive eugenics encouraged the reproduction of “fit” human specimens while negative eugenics attempted to reduce the reproduction of “unfit” specimens like the “feebleminded” and the criminal. Although eugenics became a taboo concept after World War II, it did not disappear. It was merely repackaged. Incarceration is no longer related to stated eugenic goals, yet incapacitation in prisons still exerts a prophylactic effect on human reproduction. Because minorities are incarcerated in disproportionately high numbers, the prophylactic effect of incarceration affects them most dramatically. In fact, for black males, the effect of hyper-incarceration might be so great as to depress overall reproduction rates. This article identifies some of the legal and extralegal variables that would be relevant for such an analysis and calls for such an investigation. View Full-Text
Keywords: eugenics; race; ethnicity; incarceration; prison; prophylactic effect eugenics; race; ethnicity; incarceration; prison; prophylactic effect
MDPI and ACS Style

Oleson, J.C. The New Eugenics: Black Hyper-Incarceration and Human Abatement. Soc. Sci. 2016, 5, 66.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop