Next Article in Journal
Beyond Metrics: Racial Identity Development as Anti-Colonial Praxis in Contested Institutional Spaces
Next Article in Special Issue
Grit as a Key Factor in PhD Students’ Work Engagement and Burnout
Previous Article in Journal
Reform Without Transformation: The EU’s Diminishing Leverage in the Western Balkans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Positive Psychology Interventions in Workplace Settings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Analysis of the Differences Between Unionised and Non-Unionised Workers in Psychological Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Life Satisfaction: A Study in Organisations Located in the Basque Country

by
Imanol Ulacia
1,*,
Klara Smith-Etxeberria
2 and
Angel Beldarrain-Durandegui
1
1
Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country, 20018 San Sebastian, Spain
2
Department of Basic Psychological Processes and Their Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country, 20018 San Sebastian, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(12), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120723
Submission received: 12 November 2025 / Revised: 13 December 2025 / Accepted: 15 December 2025 / Published: 17 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Job Stress and Burnout: Emerging Issues in Today’s Workplace)

Abstract

Given the limited literature on the association between trade unions and mental health, this study aims to analyse differences between unionised and non-unionised workers in terms of psychological well-being, job satisfaction, and overall life satisfaction. These differences were analysed based on a sample of 260 workers from organisations located in the Basque Country, of whom 144 were members of a trade union and 116 were not. Our results suggest significant differences between unionised and non-unionised workers in terms of autonomy (t = 3.10; p < 0.01), environmental mastery (t = 2.20; p < 0.05), and personal growth (t = 2.10; p < 0.05), with trade union members demonstrating higher mean scores in all three metrics than their non-unionised counterparts. The results also revealed significant differences in job satisfaction (t = −0.31; p < 0.01), although non-unionised workers scored higher than their unionised counterparts. Contrary to expectations, no differences were found between the groups in relation to overall life satisfaction. After discussing the results, the main limitations of the study are described, and some proposals are made for future research.

1. Introduction

The traditional pathway open to workers who wish to join forces to defend their well-being in the workplace is by forming and/or participating in trade unions (Hagedorn et al. 2016). Trade unions contribute to workers’ health through a variety of different structural and interpersonal channels. Collective bargaining and union activity often focus on workplace benefits, safer conditions, and the distribution of productivity within the organisation. Consequently, there is a strong consensus concerning the pathways that link trade unions to public health through wages, income equality, the reduction in hazardous working environments, and the promotion of social cohesion and solidarity at work (Leigh and Chakalov 2021).
Basque trade unionism has its roots in the labour movement of the late 19th century, with an evolution marked by industrialisation, the Spanish Civil War, and the subsequent dictatorship, which forged a diverse movement with a strong nationalist bent. The first attempts to organise workers in the Basque Country in the late 19th century were driven by anarchists and socialists (UGT) in response to the harsh working conditions of the growing industrial sector. The influence of socialism in the region, particularly in mining and industrial areas, was significant from the outset. A key milestone in this timeline was the founding of Solidaridad de Obreros Vascos (ELA-SOV, in Basque and Spanish) in Bilbao on 23 July 1911. Promoted by the Basque Nationalist Party (PNV), it aimed to create a specifically Basque trade union, thereby counteracting the influence of the UGT and other state-level organisations. In 1933, it changed its Spanish name to Solidaridad de Trabajadores Vascos (STV).
The Spanish Civil War and Franco’s subsequent dictatorship (1939–1975) were a period of repression and clandestinity for trade unions, which were outlawed with the exception of those controlled by the regime (the Vertical Union). ELA suspended its public activities and remained underground for almost 40 years. Other unions, such as UGT and CCOO, also operated clandestinely, playing an important role in opposing the regime. After Franco’s death and Spain’s transition to democracy, Basque unions regained their legal status. In 1977, ELA regained its legal status, and in 1980, it became the most represented union in union elections, a position it has maintained ever since. Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi (CCOO de Euskadi) and Unión General de Trabajadores del País Vasco (UGT Euskadi) are also important players in the trade union landscape, although the nationalist unions ELA and LAB tend to have a more prominent representation compared to unions at the national level (Kaiero Uría 1991; Miralles 1992).
Today, Basque trade unionism is characterised by its diversity, with Basque-based unions (ELA, LAB) and other national unions with a presence in the Basque Country (CCOO and UGT), which actively participate in collective bargaining and in demanding a Basque framework for labour relations (García Lerma and Aparicio Rodríguez 2022).

2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development

Although there is a growing body of empirical literature on the association between trade union membership and physical health (Leigh and Chakalov 2021; Malinowski et al. 2015), research into the link between trade unions and mental health is still scarce. Given that all the aims of traditional trade union organisations and activism focus on making a positive contribution to the well-being of individuals and families, a surprisingly low number of psychology research studies have focused on documenting its benefits on the individual psyche (Carriere 2020; Lott 2014; Sami 2022; Ulacia 2024; Ulacia et al. 2022). According to the research that has been conducted, the influence of trade unions is not limited to ensuring only financial well-being, but they also have a direct impact on many other variables, including psychological well-being (Carriere 2020; Chawla et al. 2018; Lott 2014; Ulacia et al. 2025), respect and dignity (Carriere 2020; Zweig 2004), self-esteem and autonomy (Carriere 2020; Fuller and Hester 2001; Pacek 2009; Rosenberg 2009), empowerment and personal development (Hogler et al. 2015; Lee et al. 2017; Malinowski et al. 2015), and trust, camaraderie, and social connection (Carriere 2020; Chawla et al. 2018; Mann 2011; Mellor 2017; Pacek 2009). Moreover, several studies have suggested that trade union membership significantly improves job satisfaction (Artz 2010; Chawla et al. 2018; Peetz 2012; Ulacia et al. 2025), satisfaction outside the workplace (Carriere 2020; Cobble 2007; Rosenberg 2009; Terríquez 2011), and overall life satisfaction (Coshow and Radcliff 2009; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016; Lott 2014; Ulacia et al. 2025).
According to Díaz et al. (2006), the study of psychological well-being has mainly focused on indicators of positive functioning. Its early iterations were rooted in concepts such as self-actualisation, maturity, and full functioning, as developed by Maslow (1968), Allport (1955), and Rogers (1951), despite repeated questions about the validity and reliability of the methods used by these authors. Their ideas, however, paved the way for other psychologists interested in identifying points of convergence and moving towards an explanatory model of psychological well-being. It is worth highlighting that the model proposed by Ryff (1989) some years later is known as the ‘Model of Constructional Multidimensionality’ or the ‘Multidimensional Model of Psychological Well-being’. The model was established after the author, together with Keyes (1985), identified six clearly differentiated dimensions that make up the concept of well-being: self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, mastery of one’s environment, purpose in life, and personal growth. To the best of our knowledge, this model of well-being has never before been applied to the study of trade union membership in the sense that, although each of the dimensions has been studied independently, they have never been analysed as a whole.
First, self-acceptance is one of the key criteria for well-being. Despite being aware of their own limitations, people tend to try to feel good about themselves. Having a positive attitude towards oneself is a fundamental characteristic of positive psychological functioning (Keyes et al. 2002). Several authors have argued that belonging to a trade union provides an individual with the opportunity to gain control and power over some aspects of their work and family life, thereby enhancing self-esteem and, consequently, self-acceptance (Carriere 2020; Fuller and Hester 2001; Hagedorn et al. 2016; Lott 2014; Rosenberg 2009). Second, people need to maintain stable and positive relationships and have friends they can rely on. The capacity to love is a fundamental component of well-being and mental health (Ryff and Singer 1998). Hagedorn et al. (2016) argue that trade unions foster well-being by encouraging democratic engagement and creating a sense of community among workers. They also help strengthen social support networks, interpersonal connections, a sense of solidarity, and, ultimately, a more active social life (Becker et al. 2024; Lott 2014). Third, in relation to autonomy, people need to be grounded in their own convictions and maintain their independence and personal authority. Autonomous individuals are able to better resist social pressures and self-regulate their behaviour (Ryff and Keyes 1995). Trade unions offer workers the opportunity to exercise greater control over various aspects of their personal and family lives, thereby promoting higher levels of independence and autonomy (Carriere 2020; Lott 2014; Rosenberg 2009). Fourth, environmental mastery refers to the ability to choose or create environments that are conducive to satisfying one’s desires and needs. People with high levels of environmental mastery have a greater sense of control over the world and feel that they are able to influence their surroundings (Keyes et al. 2002). Being a member of a trade union helps ensure that marginalised voices—including those of women (Kirton 2017), immigrants (Bada et al. 2018), and other minorities (Sweetman 2018)—are heard while at the same time increasing their capacity to right wrongs (Mann 2011). Having a clear group ‘voice’ and engaging in collective action generates a sense of empowerment, which in turn contributes to an increased sense of control over one’s environment, including a greater sense of job security (Becker et al. 2024). Fifth, people need to have a purpose in life and to set themselves goals that give their lives meaning. In this regard, belonging to a trade union enables individuals to set positive goals for themselves and achieve them through planned action (Lott 2014; Mann 2011; Pacek 2009). Finally, psychological well-being also requires the desire to develop one’s potential and grow as a person (Keyes et al. 2002). Several studies highlight the role that trade unions play in improving the communication, social, and problem-solving skills of their members, as well as in helping develop more informed and active citizens (Becker et al. 2024; Radcliff 2005).
For its part, job satisfaction is a construct that has attracted much attention from organisational behaviour specialists and is considered a strategic asset due to its favourable impact on organisational outcomes and employee well-being. At an organisational level, the evidence reported to date suggests that having satisfied workers is tantamount to having committed and motivated employees. At a personal level, thanks to a kind of ‘contagion’ effect, job satisfaction has been observed to spread to other areas of life, generating satisfaction with family and life in general (Carlson et al. 2014). Conceptually, job satisfaction has been defined from both an affective and cognitive perspective. According to the former, job satisfaction is considered a positive feeling experienced by an individual as a result of performing a job that interests them, in an environment that allows them to feel comfortable, and within an organisation that they find attractive (Judge and Klinger 2008). According to the latter, job satisfaction is viewed as an objective assessment or measurable judgement of one’s own work (Weiss 2002). In an attempt to overcome this dichotomy, Judge and Kammeyer-Mueller (2012) proposed a comprehensive definition that subsumes both aspects into an encompassing concept that has a broad consensus. However, instruments for measuring job satisfaction have, to date, focused solely on the cognitive dimension (Dalal and Credé 2013).
Much of the empirical evidence reported over recent decades supports the idea that trade union membership contributes significantly to individuals’ job satisfaction (Peetz 2012; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016; Chawla et al. 2018; Blanchflower et al. 2021). Despite this, there is much debate on the subject since the factors involved in the association between trade union membership and job satisfaction are multiple and complex. The meta-analysis conducted by Laroche (2016) suggests that this tension may stem from what the author defines as reverse causality; i.e., dissatisfied workers would be more likely to join trade unions in order to try to improve their unsatisfactory working conditions. It is also important to consider the effects of self-selection and socialisation processes (Bardi et al. 2014). Do people’s values align with those of organisations from the outset, implying self-selection based on values? Or do they change to better align with the appropriate and desirable values of those organisations, implying socialisation of values? In this regard, it is worth asking to what extent the level of job satisfaction among unionised workers is genuine or influenced by the need to conform to the values of their unions.
Other studies suggest that the relationship perceived by workers between trade union membership and job satisfaction may vary throughout the course of their lives. Studies such as those by Artz (2010) and Blanchflower et al. (2021) conclude that it is important to take into account the effect of the occupational and existential changes that workers may undergo at different stages of their lives. According to other authors, the substantial differences that exist between countries should be taken into account when studying the relationship between trade union membership and job satisfaction (Gumbrell-McCormick 2022; Hipp and Kolins Givan 2015). For instance, in a transnational study, Hipp and Kolins Givan (2015) found that the association between trade union membership and job satisfaction varies from country to country, depending on the political and social environment. Finally, according to the same study, being a member of a trade union also functions as a response mechanism that gives workers a channel through which they can voice their needs and preferences. The channelling of workers’ aspirations and proposals through trade unions has a positive effect on all factors influencing behaviour in the workplace, which, in addition to benefiting the company, also results in greater job satisfaction (Chawla et al. 2018; Peetz 2012).
Finally, life satisfaction is defined as an overall assessment made by an individual of their life (Pavot et al. 1991). According to this definition, when making this assessment, the individual examines all the tangible aspects of their life, weighing up the good and the bad, comparing this result with their own standards or criteria (Shin and Johnson 1978), and then reaching a conclusion about their general level of satisfaction with their life (Pavot et al. 1991). Judgements about satisfaction therefore depend on the comparisons that subjects make between the circumstances of their lives and what they consider to be a suitable standard. This last nuance is important because we are not talking about an externally imposed standard here but rather a self-imposed criterion. According to Diener (1984), research into life satisfaction should focus on the subjective judgements made by individuals about their own lives. In other words, rather than adding up satisfaction scores in specific areas to obtain a measure of overall satisfaction, it is better to ask the individual in question for an overall assessment of their life (Diener et al. 1985).
In general, few studies have attempted to analyse the effect of trade union membership on workers’ life satisfaction. Furthermore, although most conclude that belonging to a trade union has a positive effect on workers’ life satisfaction (Charman and Owen 2014; Flavin et al. 2010; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016; Lee 2022), some discrepancies can be observed, as some authors have failed to find any significant association between trade union membership and life satisfaction while others have found a negative correlation between the two (Becker et al. 2024; Charman and Owen 2014; Lee 2022). Some studies suggest that the association between trade union membership and life satisfaction is indirect in nature, with various explanatory mechanisms affecting the relationship (Becker et al. 2024; Bergagna et al. 2022; Flavin et al. 2010; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016; Lee 2022). One of the most studied of these mechanisms, for which strong mediating effects have been found, is job satisfaction. Several studies have concluded that trade union membership correlates positively with job satisfaction and that this in turn is positively associated with life satisfaction (Bergagna et al. 2022; Charman and Owen 2014; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016).
In order to contribute new evidence to this avenue of research, the present study analyses the differences between unionised and non-unionised workers in organisations located in the Basque Country in terms of self-acceptance, positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth and autonomy of psychological well-being (Díaz et al. 2006), job satisfaction (Schlett and Ziegler 2014), and overall life satisfaction (Pavot et al. 1991). We therefore posed the following hypotheses:
Hypotheses H1.
We expected unionised workers to have higher levels of psychological well-being in terms of self-acceptance, positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, and personal growth than their non-unionised counterparts.
Hypotheses H2.
We expected unionised workers to have higher levels of job satisfaction than their non-unionised counterparts.
Hypotheses H3.
We expected unionised workers to have higher levels of life satisfaction than their non-unionised counterparts.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Procedure

Prior to collecting the data, coordinators at each organisation were contacted and informed of the aims of the study. To clear up any possible doubts or queries, after they had given their approval, these same coordinators were sent a copy of the evaluation protocol along with the principal investigator’s email address. All respondents were informed of the study’s aims and participated voluntarily through a survey available in both digital format (77.3%; n = 201) and paper-and-pencil format (22.7%; n = 59). In the digital format, information was collected anonymously through an electronic survey distributed by the coordinators at each organisation over the online Survio platform. In the paper-and-pencil format, the research team visited the organisation with printed copies of the survey in response to a telephone call from the corresponding coordinator. The coordinator’s task was to facilitate the research team’s access to a network of potential participants, both by sharing the link to our Survio questionnaire and by convening meetings to complete the paper-and-pencil surveys. The study was approved by the University of the Basque Country’s Ethics Committee for Research with Humans, and the data was collected in accordance with the committee’s guidelines and the current data protection act.

3.2. Participants

Participants included unionised and non-unionised workers from the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country in Spain. The participating organisations were contacted through the ELA trade union. A total of twelve organisations participated from the industrial (63.8%) and service sectors (31.2%). Of the 263 participants in the original sample, 260 reported on the variables of interest. Of these, 55.4% were trade union members. The majority of these union members reported having belonged to their union for 5 or more years (n = 90; 34.6%), with a smaller number having been unionised for only 1–3 years (n = 28), 2–5 years (n = 19), or 1 year or less (n = 13). Of the sample of 144 union members, 43.5% were aged between 41 and 50 years, 31.4 were aged between 20 and 40 years, and 21.3% between 51 and 60 years. Just over half (53.7%) were women (44.4% were men; 1.9% were non-binary). Regarding non-unionised workers, 46.5% were aged between 41 and 50 years, followed by 33.8% between 51 and 60 years, 12% between 31 and 40 years, 4.9% between 20 and 30 years, and 2.8% more than 60 years; 51% were women (48.3% men; 0.7% non-binary).

3.3. Instruments

Psychological well-being was assessed using the Spanish version of the Psychological Well-Being Scales (Ryff 1989) adapted by Díaz et al. (2006). These scales comprise 29 items ranging from 1 = “strongly disagree” to 6 = “strongly agree”: 4 items regarding self-acceptance, 5 items regarding positive relations, 6 items regarding autonomy, 5 items regarding environmental mastery, 4 items regarding personal growth, and 5 items regarding purpose in life. Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for all six dimensions: 0.83 for self-acceptance; 0.80 for positive relations; 0.70 for autonomy; 0.65 for environmental mastery; 0.77 for personal growth; and 0.87 for purpose in life.
To measure job satisfaction, we used the Generic Job Satisfaction Scale (MacDonald and MacIntyre 1997), which is considered a parsimonious and reliable instrument. Compared to other general scales, which range from 50 to 100 items (Smith et al. 1969; Weiss et al. 1967), this scale provides valid and reliable scores with only 10 items and has been localized into several different languages. In this study, we used the Spanish version, which was adapted and validated by Salessi and Omar (2006) and contains 7 items (α = 0.79), ranging from 1 = “never” to 5 = “always”.
The Life Satisfaction Scale by Diener et al. (1985) was used to measure life satisfaction. The ease with which this instrument can be administered and interpreted has led to it being validated and used in a range of different cultures and languages. For the purposes of the present study, we used the 5-item Spanish adaptation by Pons et al. (2002) (α = 0.88), ranging from 1 = “strongly disagree” to 7 = “strongly agree”.
Trade union membership was assessed by asking participants whether or not they belonged to a trade union (1 = yes; 0 = no). Finally, sociodemographic data were gathered, including age, gender, and the sector in which respondents were employed.

4. Results

Table 1 presents bivariate correlations. Being a member of a trade union was associated with higher scores for autonomy, environmental mastery, and personal growth, although it was also associated negatively with job satisfaction. Positive and significant correlations were found between all variables (the six dimensions of well-being, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction). In addition, gender (being a woman) was particularly highly correlated with personal growth, and age (older than 41) to being a union member.
Chi-square tests with continuity correction were carried out in order to compare the distribution of gender (woman = 1; man = 0) and age (1 = 41 years or more; 0 = 41 years or less) across the two groups of unionized and non-unionized workers (unionized = 1; non-unionized = 0). Results indicated non-significant relationships between gender and being a union member. However, in relation to age, significant relationships were found χ2 (1, 251) = 6.523, p < 0.05).
A two-sample t-test was conducted to analyse differences between trade union members and non-members in self-acceptance, positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction (see Table 2). Significant differences were found in relation to autonomy (t = 3.10; p < 0.01), environmental mastery (t = 2.20; p < 0.05), and personal growth (t = 2.10; p < 0.05), with trade union members having higher mean scores than their non-unionised counterparts. The results also revealed significant differences for job satisfaction (t = −0.31; p < 0.01), although in this case, non-unionised workers scored higher than their unionised counterparts.

5. Discussion

The aim of this study was to analyse the differences between unionised and non-unionised workers of the Basque Country in psychological well-being (i.e., self-acceptance, positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth), job satisfaction, and life satisfaction.
The results obtained for each of the dimensions of psychological well-being suggest that unionised workers have higher levels of autonomy, environmental mastery, and personal growth. This finding partially confirms our first hypothesis (H1) and is consistent with what has been reported to date in the existing literature, suggesting that trade union membership fosters autonomy by offering workers the possibility of exercising greater control over certain aspects of their personal and family lives, thereby enhancing their independence (Carriere 2020; Lott 2014; Rosenberg 2009). In this regard, it should be noted that the process of self-selection itself (Bardi et al. 2014), whereby individuals choose unions based on their objectives and values, contributes to improving levels of autonomy, given that self-selection is a practical way to exercise autonomy, making individuals feel more in control. Likewise, the result obtained for environmental mastery is consistent with the idea that trade union activity and collective action generate a feeling of empowerment (by giving a ‘voice’ to minorities and increasing their ability to right wrongs), which in turn results in a greater sense of control over the work environment and greater job security (Bada et al. 2018; Becker et al. 2024; Kirton 2017; Mann 2011; Sweetman 2018). The positive association found for personal growth supports the role played by trade unions in improving their members’ communication, social, and problem-solving skills, thereby helping them reach their full potential (Becker et al. 2024; Radcliff 2005). Our results suggest that this is something particularly appreciated by women who might likely be more concerned than men with the specific issue of personal growth, as recent research has pointed out (Brown et al. 2025). In contrast, no significant differences were found between unionised and non-unionised workers in terms of self-acceptance, positive relations, or purpose in life. Although the (limited) existing literature posits that trade union membership should indeed promote self-acceptance (through improved self-esteem) (Carriere 2020; Fuller and Hester 2001; Hagedorn et al. 2016; Lott 2014; Rosenberg 2009), positive relations (by fostering a sense of community and strengthening social support networks) (Becker et al. 2024; Hagedorn et al. 2016; Lott 2014), and purpose in life (by enabling members to set themselves and achieve positive goals) (Lott 2014; Mann 2011; Pacek 2009), these effects were not found to be significant in our sample. However, given that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that Ryff’s ‘Multidimensional Model of Psychological Well-being’ (Ryff 1989) has been applied to the study of trade union membership (as noted in the Introduction), it would be advisable to replicate this study in larger samples. Furthermore, it would be useful to consider the effect of different mediating variables (such as members’ level of commitment to their trade union) on possible associations between trade union membership and psychological well-being.
Significant differences were found between unionised and non-unionised workers in terms of job satisfaction. However, contrary to expectations, non-unionised workers scored significantly higher in this variable than their unionised counterparts. Therefore, the second hypothesis (H2) is rejected. This finding is inconsistent with much of the empirical evidence indicating the positive contribution made by trade union membership to job satisfaction (Peetz 2012; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016; Chawla et al. 2018; Blanchflower et al. 2021). However, it is consistent with both the ongoing debate and the reverse causality hypothesis (Laroche 2016), according to which dissatisfied workers are more likely to join trade unions than their satisfied counterparts as a means of improving their unsatisfactory working conditions. Along the same lines, the Attraction/Attention/Restraint theory (ASA, Schneider et al. 1995) argues that similar people tend to group together in spaces that match their goals and values, becoming even more similar through this process of socialisation.
In relation to life satisfaction, no significant differences were found between unionised and non-unionised workers, a finding that also fails to confirm part of our third hypothesis (H3). Although most of the (few) studies that have been carried out in this field conclude that belonging to a trade union has a positive effect on workers’ life satisfaction (Charman and Owen 2014; Flavin et al. 2010; Flavin and Shufeldt 2016; Lee 2022), our finding adds to the discrepancies observed previously in the literature regarding this difference, as some studies have found no significant differences between unionised and non-unionised workers in life satisfaction while others have found negative associations between the two variables (Becker et al. 2024; Charman and Owen 2014; Lee 2022). The lack of significant differences between unionised and non-unionised workers in terms of life satisfaction may also be due to the possible mediation of other mechanisms (such as job satisfaction), which may interfere with this association.
This study is not without its limitations. The first is linked to the imbalance in the sample, given that the number of unionised workers was higher than that of non-unionised workers. The second limitation is related to the overall completion rate of the questionnaire filled in online over the Survio platform, which was only 40%. This means that six out of every ten people who accessed the questionnaire failed to complete it. Based on the feedback provided by the coordinators at the participating organisations, we can conclude that the main reason for this low completion rate was the length of the questionnaire. The third limitation is that our study was based on the assumption that being a member of a trade union necessarily entails a commitment of the members to that union. However, as indicated by the principal models of trade union commitment (Gordon et al. 1980; Sverke and Kuruvilla 1995; Tetrick et al. 2007), this is not always the case. Future studies should strive to recruit more balanced samples, making sure to include a higher number of non-unionised workers. We also recommend reducing the length of the questionnaire so that it can be completed more quickly. Finally, it would be useful to assess the level of commitment felt by unionised workers, as scores for the three variables studied are likely to differ between committed and non-committed members, with the former perceiving greater benefits.
Despite its limitations, the present study makes a significant contribution to the existing body of literature, as it explores differences between unionised and non-unionised workers in mental health (a field of study that is as relevant as it is under-researched). Moreover, it does so in a new context (the Basque Country) using a multidimensional model of psychological well-being (Ryff 1989).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.U., A.B.-D. and K.S.-E.; methodology, I.U., A.B.-D. and K.S.-E.; formal analysis, A.B.-D. and K.S.-E.; investigation, I.U., A.B.-D. and K.S.-E.; resources, I.U.; data curation, I.U., A.B.-D. and K.S.-E.; writing—original draft preparation, I.U.; writing—review and editing, A.B.-D. and K.S.-E.; visualization, I.U.; supervision, I.U.; project administration, I.U.; funding acquisition, I.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project was funded by the Guipúzcoa Provincial Council within the ‘Partaidetza’ Programme. Project number: OF-341/2020 (ES).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of the Basque Country (Protocol code: M10_2020_355/Date of approval: 14 March 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the employees of the participating organisations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Allport, Gordon W. 1955. Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Artz, Benjamin. 2010. The impact of union experience on job satisfaction. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 49: 387–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Bada, Xóchitl, Shannon Gleeson, and Els de Graauw. 2018. Union Organizing, Advocacy, and Services at the Nexus of Immigrant and Labor Rights. In No One Size Fits All: Worker Organization, Policy, and Movement in a New Economic Age. Edited by Janice Fine, Linda Burnham, Kate Griffith, Minsun Ji, Victor Narro and Steven Pitts. Champaign: LERA Research Volume Series, pp. 91–113. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardi, Anat, Kathryn Emma Buchanan, Robin Godwin, and Letitia Gabriela Slabu. 2013. Value Stability and Change During Self-Chosen Life Transitions: Self-Selection Versus Socialization Effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106: 131–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Becker, Björn, Laszlo Goerke, and Yue Huang. 2024. Trade union membership and life satisfaction in Germany. An International Journal of Employment Relations 63: 462–77. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergagna, Elisa, Angela Fedi, Norma De Piccoli, Silvia Gattino, Stefano Tartaglia, and Mara Martini. 2022. A membership for quality of life? The mediating effect of job satisfaction in unionized and non-unionized workers. Československá Psychologie 6: 631–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Blanchflower, David G., Alex Bryson, and Colin Green. 2021. Trade unions and the well-being of workers. British Journal of Industrial Relations 60: 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Brown, Mitch, Natalie J. Gonzalez, and Jack J. Bauer. 2025. Contextual preferences for growth motivation in mates. Evolutionary Psychological Science 11: 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Carlson, Dawn S., Emily M. Hunter, Merideth Ferguson, and Dwayne Whitten. 2014. Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: Mediating processes and relative impact of originating and receiving domains. Journal of Management 40: 845–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Carriere, Kevin R. 2020. Workers’ rights are human rights: Organizing the psychology of labor movements. Current Opinion in Psychology 35: 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Charman, Crawford, and Ann L. Owen. 2014. Collective happiness: Labour union membership and life satisfaction. Applied Economics Letters 21: 924–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Chawla, Ginni, Tripti Singh, Rupali Singh, and Sonal Agarwal. 2018. Worker participation in union activities: A conceptual review. Personnel Review 47: 206–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Cobble, Dorothy Sue. 2007. The Sex of Class: Women Transforming American Labor. New York: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Coshow, Suzanne M., and Benjamin Radcliff. 2009. Labor organization and the quality of life in the American states. In Happiness, Economics and Politics: Toward a Multidisciplinary Approach. Edited by Amitava Krishna Dutt and Benjamin Radcliff. Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 285–300. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dalal, Reeshad S., and Marcus Credé. 2013. Job satisfaction and other job attitudes. In APA Handbook of Testing and Assessment in Psychology. Edited by Kurt F. Geisinger, Bruce A. Bracken, Janet F. Carlson, Jo-Ida C. Hansen, Nathan R. Kuncel, Steven P. Reise and Michael C. Rodriguez. Washington: American Psychological Association, pp. 675–91. [Google Scholar]
  16. Diener, Ed. 1984. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 95: 542–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Diener, Ed, Robert Emmons, Randy Larsen, and Sharon Griffin. 1985. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49: 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Díaz, Darío, Raquel Rodríguez, Amalio Blanco, Bernardo Moreno, Ismaela Gallardo, and Dirk Van Dierendonck. 2006. Adaptación española Escalas de bienestar psicológico. Psicothema 18: 572–77. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Flavin, Patrick, Alexander C. Pacek, and Benjamin Radcliff. 2010. Labor unions and life satisfaction: Evidence from new data. Social Indicators Research 98: 435–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Flavin, Patrick, and Gregory Shufeldt. 2016. Labor union membership and life satisfaction in the United States. Labor Studies Journal 41: 171–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Fuller, Jerry B., and Kim Hester. 2001. A closer look at the relationship between justice perceptions and union participation. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 1096–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. García Lerma, Miguel, and Víctor Aparicio Rodríguez. 2022. De Europa a Euskadi, sindicalismo, clase y nación. Pensamiento y Cultura 17: 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gordon, Michael E., John W. Philpot, Robert E. Burt, Cynthia A. Thompson, and William E. Spiller. 1980. Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and Examination of its correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology 65: 479–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gumbrell-McCormick, Rebecca. 2022. Union democracy: A European perspective. Labor Studies Journal 47: 170–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Hagedorn, Jenn, Claudia Alexandra Paras, Howard Greenwich, and Amy Hagopian. 2016. The role of labor unions in creating working conditions that promote public health. American Journal of Public Health 106: 989–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Hipp, Lena, and Rebecca Kolins Givan. 2015. The unionization-Job satisfaction relationship—What do unions do? A cross-national reexamination of the relationship between unionization and job satisfaction. Social Forces 94: 349–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Hogler, Raymond L., Herbert G Hunt, and Stephan Weiler. 2015. Killing Unions with Culture: Institutions, Inequality, and the Effects of Labor’s Decline in the United States. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 27: 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Judge, Timothy A., and John D. Kammeyer-Mueller. 2012. General and specific measures in organizational behavior research: Considerations and recommendations for researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior 33: 161–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Judge, Timothy A., and Ryan Klinger. 2008. Job satisfaction: Subjective well-being at work. In The Science of Subjective Well-Being. Edited by Michael Eid and Randy J. Larsen. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 393–413. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kaiero Uría, Andoni. 1991. Implantación y perfil de los sindicatos en Euskadi. Revista Internacional de los Estudios Vascos 39: 261–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Keyes, Corey, Carol Ryff, and Dov Shmotkin. 2002. Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 1007–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Keyes, Ralph. 1985. Chancing It: Why We Take Risks. Cincinnati: Brown. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kirton, Gill. 2017. From a woman’s place is in her union to strong unions need women: Changing gender discourses, policies, and realities in the union movement. Labour and Industry 27: 270–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Laroche, Patrice. 2016. A meta-analysis of the union-job satisfaction relationship. British Journal of Industrial Relations 54: 709–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Lee, Nagyeong, Hyoju Sung, Ji Huam Kim, Laura Punnett, and Seung Kim. 2017. Perceived discrimination and low back pain among 28,532 workers in South Korea: Effect modification by labor union status. Social Science and Medicine 177: 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Lee, Yong-Woo. 2022. Trade union workers’ life satisfaction in South Korea. Applied Research in Quality of Life 17: 277–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Leigh, J. Paul, and Bozhidar Chakalov. 2021. Labor unions and health: A literature review of pathways and outcomes in the workplace. Preventive Medicine Reports 24: 101–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Lott, Bernice. 2014. Social class myopia: The case of Psychology and Labor Unions. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Issues 14: 261–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. MacDonald, Scott, and Peter MacIntyre. 1997. The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly 13: 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Malinowski, Beth, Meredith Minkler, and Laura Stock. 2015. Labor unions: A public health institution. American Journal of Public Health 105: 261–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Mann, Eric. 2011. Ten Reasons Protecting Unions Is a Life-and-Death Issue. TruthOut. Available online: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/1239:ten-reasons-protecting-unions-is-a-lifeanddeath-issue (accessed on 5 May 2025).
  42. Maslow, Abraham. 1968. Toward a Psychology of Being. Jersey City: Van Nostrand. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mellor, Steven. 2017. Confidence at work and individualism-collectivism: An empirical demonstration of the distinctiveness of American union employees. Current Psychology 38: 542–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Miralles, Ricardo. 1992. Historiografía del movimiento obrero en el País Vasco. Historia Contemporánea 7: 237–55. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pacek, Alexander C. 2009. Politics and happiness: An empirical ledger. In Happiness, Economics and Politics: Toward a Multidisciplinary Approach. Edited by Amitava Krishna Dutt and Benjamin Radcliff. Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 221–51. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pavot, William, Ed Diener, Randall C. Colvin, and Ed Sandvik. 1991. Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Social Indicators Research 28: 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Peetz, David. 2012. Does industrial relations policy affect productivity? Australian Bulletin of Labour 38: 268–92. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pons, Diana, Francisco L. Atienza, Isabel Balaguer, and Marisa García-Merita. 2002. Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica 13: 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  49. Radcliff, Benjamin. 2005. Class Organization and Subjective Well-Being: A Cross-National Analysis. Social Forces 84: 513–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Rogers, Carl. 1951. Client-Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rosenberg, Jessica. 2009. Organized labor’s contribution to the human services: Lessons from the past and strategies for the future. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health 24: 113–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Ryff, Carol. 1989. Scale of Psychological Well-being. The structure of Psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 719–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ryff, Carol, and Burton Singer. 1998. The contours of positive health. Psychological Inquiry 9: 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Ryff, Carol, and Corey Keyes. 1995. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 719–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Salessi, Solana Magalí, and Alicia Graciela Omar. 2006. Satisfacción Laboral Genérica. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala para medirla. Alternativas en Psicología 34: 93–108. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sami, Waleed Y. 2022. Labor Union Affiliation and Its Influence on Psychological Well-Being and Depression. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University. [Google Scholar]
  57. Schlett, Christian, and Rene Ziegler. 2014. Job emotions and job cognitions as determinants of job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior 84: 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Schneider, Benjamin, Harold W. Goldstein, and Brent Smith. 1995. The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology 48: 747–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Shin, Doh Chull, and David Michael Johnson. 1978. Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research 5: 475–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Smith, Patricia Cain, Lorne M. Kendall, and Charles L. Hulin. 1969. The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sverke, Magnus, and Sarosh Kuruvilla. 1995. A new conceptualization of union commitment: Development and test of an integrated theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior 16: 505–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Sweetman, Joseph. 2018. When similarities are more important than differences: Politically Black Union members experiences of racism and participation in union leadership. Journal of Social Issues 74: 244–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Terríquez, Veronica. 2011. Schools for democracy: Labor union participation and Latino immigrant parents’ school-based civic engagement. American Sociological Review 76: 581–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Tetrick, Lois E., Lynn M. Shore, Lucy Newton McClurg, and Robert J. Vandenberg. 2007. A model of union participation: The impact of perceived union support, union instrumentality and union loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology 92: 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  65. Ulacia, Imanol. 2024. El surgimiento de una genuina psicología organizacional sindical. In Desafíos Contemporáneos en Los Entornos Laborales. Edited by Carlos Piñeiro. Madrid: Pirámide, pp. 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ulacia, Imanol, Angel Beldarrain-Durandegui, and Klara Smith-Etxeberria. 2025. Asociaciones de la afiliación sindical con el bienestar psicológico, la satisfacción laboral y la satisfacción con la vida: Una revisión teórica. Revista De Relaciones Laborales 53: 88–104. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ulacia, Imanol, Klara Smith-Etxeberria, and Angel Beldarrain-Durandegui. 2022. Applying Work and Organizational Psychology in the field of labor relations. Exploratory study in trade unions in the Basque Country. Social Sciences 11: 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Weiss, David J., Rene W. Dawis, George W. England, and Lloyd H. Lofquist. 1967. Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
  69. Weiss, Howard M. 2002. Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review 12: 173–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Zweig, Michael. 2004. What’s Class Got to Do with It? American Society in the Twenty-First Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Correlations between the study variables.
Table 1. Correlations between the study variables.
1234567891011
1. Member1
2. Gender (woman)−0.0261
3. Age (>41 years)0.17 **0.101
4. Self-Acceptance0.077−0.0190.0871
5. Positive Relations0.0840.103−0.0250.473 **1
6. Autonomy0.191 **−0.0670.0640.553 **0.412 **1
7. Environmental Mastery0.137 *0.0460.0820.721 **0.559 **0.532 **1
8. Personal Growth0.129 *0.229 **−0.0480.550 **0.495 **0.357 **0.533 **1
9. Purpose in Life0.0420.0400.0730.765 **0.460 **0.449 **0.755 **0.581 **1
10. Job Satisfaction−0.191 **0.0050.0030.259 **0.242 **0.145 *0.284 **0.1080.287 **1
11. Life Satisfaction0.0020.0520.0370.696 **0.438 **0.358 **0.594 **0.390 **0.659 **0.472 **1
Note. p * < 0.01; ** p < 0.001.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and mean differences between trade union members and non-members in relation to psychological well-being, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and mean differences between trade union members and non-members in relation to psychological well-being, job satisfaction, and life satisfaction.
MembersNon-Memberstp
M (SD) M (SD)
Well-being: Self-acceptance4.660.914.510.911.230.220
Well-being: Positive Relations4.830.924.661.041.330.184
Well-being: Autonomy4.480.944.120.893.100.002
Well-being: Environmental Mastery4.790.794.570.762.200.030
Well-being: Personal Growth4.980.944.730.982.100.040
Well-being: Purpose in Life4.631.024.550.950.670.503
Job Satisfaction3.590.753.870.69−3.100.002
Life Satisfaction5.051.15.051.30.030.973
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ulacia, I.; Smith-Etxeberria, K.; Beldarrain-Durandegui, A. An Analysis of the Differences Between Unionised and Non-Unionised Workers in Psychological Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Life Satisfaction: A Study in Organisations Located in the Basque Country. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14, 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120723

AMA Style

Ulacia I, Smith-Etxeberria K, Beldarrain-Durandegui A. An Analysis of the Differences Between Unionised and Non-Unionised Workers in Psychological Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Life Satisfaction: A Study in Organisations Located in the Basque Country. Social Sciences. 2025; 14(12):723. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ulacia, Imanol, Klara Smith-Etxeberria, and Angel Beldarrain-Durandegui. 2025. "An Analysis of the Differences Between Unionised and Non-Unionised Workers in Psychological Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Life Satisfaction: A Study in Organisations Located in the Basque Country" Social Sciences 14, no. 12: 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120723

APA Style

Ulacia, I., Smith-Etxeberria, K., & Beldarrain-Durandegui, A. (2025). An Analysis of the Differences Between Unionised and Non-Unionised Workers in Psychological Well-Being, Job Satisfaction, and Life Satisfaction: A Study in Organisations Located in the Basque Country. Social Sciences, 14(12), 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop