Next Article in Journal
Policy Advocacy and NGOs Assisting Immigrants: Legitimacy, Accountability and the Perceived Attitude of the Majority
Next Article in Special Issue
Subsidy Reform and the Transformation of Social Contracts: The Cases of Egypt, Iran and Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on Digitalization of CSR during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges
Previous Article in Special Issue
Service Delivery, State Legitimacy and Conflict in Arab Countries: Exploring the Key Linkages Using a Social Policy Perspective
 
 
Article

Political Fragility and the Timing of Conflict Mediation

School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Academic Editors: Timo Kivimaki and Rana Jawad
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(2), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020076
Received: 4 October 2021 / Revised: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 15 February 2022
In recent years, much of the public discourse regarding conflict in the Middle East has pondered the possibility of military intervention, but far less attention has been paid to the optimal mechanisms for conflict mediation. There remains considerable confusion in the study of conflict resolution about how to locate the right time, or ‘ripe moment’ for this type of third-party involvement. This is a crucial area of policy relevant research. When attempting to model ripeness, most of the literature has relied on expected utility models of decision-making and found that crucial but nebulous factors that are important in the MENA region, such as conflicting parties’ psychology, religious and political beliefs, as well as grievances compounded over time, cannot easily be incorporated into the framework. This paper offers a plausibility probe to highlight the potential of an augmented approach. Using Poliheuristic (PH) Theory that reflects the non-compensatory nature of political risk, it creates a litmus test for third-party mediation based not on what conflicting parties aim to achieve, but what outcomes and processes they must avoid. The result is a relatively simple identification of ‘bad’ timing, as well as theory-informed mechanisms designed to help practitioners generate better conditions for mediation. This probe contributes to our understanding of the relationship between political fragility and conflict in the MENA region by indicating how political fragility might be conceptualized as a process that can be mapped and perhaps interrupted. View Full-Text
Keywords: conflict; mediation; PH theory; Israel; Palestine; ripeness conflict; mediation; PH theory; Israel; Palestine; ripeness
MDPI and ACS Style

Beckerman, C. Political Fragility and the Timing of Conflict Mediation. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020076

AMA Style

Beckerman C. Political Fragility and the Timing of Conflict Mediation. Social Sciences. 2022; 11(2):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Beckerman, Carly. 2022. "Political Fragility and the Timing of Conflict Mediation" Social Sciences 11, no. 2: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020076

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop