Next Article in Journal
Autonomous Building Detection Using Edge Properties and Image Color Invariants
Previous Article in Journal
Phase Change Materials for Building Applications: A Thorough Review and New Perspectives
Open AccessArticle

Optimizing Single-Ply Low-Slope Roofing Assemblies for Insulation Value

1
Building and Roofing Science, GAF, 1 Campus Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054, USA
2
Product Management, GAF, 1 Campus Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2018, 8(5), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8050064
Received: 22 March 2018 / Revised: 23 April 2018 / Accepted: 26 April 2018 / Published: 28 April 2018
Low-slope roofing assemblies can be designed with a range of insulation and membrane-attachment methods. Various building and energy codes appear to assume fastening methods to have an insignificant effect on insulation value, meaning that design and effective values are essentially the same. Recent studies showing that mechanically fastened systems could have very significant loss of insulation value are reviewed. This study uses thermal losses shown in those recent studies and examines the practical effect on various roof assemblies. Fully mechanically attached systems are compared with those that use adhesive attachment for the membrane and part of the insulation assembly. The thermal losses are shown to be significant and are presented in terms of the economic loss of the insulation. The cost of lost R-value is contrasted with the cost of attachment. A system based on a first layer of mechanically attached insulation with a second layer of insulation and membrane being adhered is shown to be very similar in cost, once the lost R-value is included. Finally, the loss in energy efficiency is calculated over a 15-year time frame. When total system costs include fastening as well as energy efficiency, then mechanically attached systems are essentially equivalent to some fully adhered approaches. Overall, the work challenges the code assumption that fastening methods do not significantly impact insulation efficiency. Furthermore, the results have implications for any analysis that considers such factors as carbon footprint, since building-energy efficiencies might be lower than currently assumed. View Full-Text
Keywords: roofing assemblies; steel fasteners; heat transfer; energy impact; insulation value roofing assemblies; steel fasteners; heat transfer; energy impact; insulation value
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Taylor, T.J.; Willits, J.; Hartwig, C.A.; Kirby, J.R. Optimizing Single-Ply Low-Slope Roofing Assemblies for Insulation Value. Buildings 2018, 8, 64.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop