Next Article in Journal
Forecasting Fatal Construction Accidents Using an STL–BiGRU Hybrid Framework: A Multi-Scale Time Series Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Characterization of Composite Bamboo Shear Wall Panels Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of ELF Procedure for Seismically Isolated Buildings Under Extreme Earthquakes: Near-Field Effects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Modeling Seismic Resilience and Hospital Evacuation: A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Classical Evacuation Models

by
Chunlin Bian
1,
Yonghao Guo
2,
Gang Meng
1,3,*,
Liuyang Li
4,5,*,
Hua Chen
4,
Fuhong Lv
6 and
Xiaofeng Chai
7
1
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2
Guizhou Provincial Industrial Financing Guarantee Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081, China
3
Tongji Architectural Design (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China
4
China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200135, China
5
China Construction Eighth Bureau General Contracting Construction Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201204, China
6
China Railway International Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China
7
School of Information Science and Technology, Xichang University, Xichang 615000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(8), 1538; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081538
Submission received: 29 January 2026 / Revised: 31 March 2026 / Accepted: 10 April 2026 / Published: 14 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Solutions for Enhancing Seismic Resilience of Buildings)

Abstract

Hospitals in earthquake-prone regions must evacuate heterogeneous occupants rapidly while preserving operational continuity under disrupted conditions. However, many hospital-evacuation studies still rely on static routing assumptions or narrowly defined behavioral rules, which limits their value for building-level resilience planning. This paper develops a comparative hospital-campus evacuation framework that combines GIS-based geodesic routing, heterogeneous agent-based modeling, and reinforcement-learning-based decision policies. Puge County People’s Hospital in Sichuan, China, is used as the case study. Six algorithms are evaluated: three rule-based baselines—Shortest Path (SP), Random Walk (RW), and the Social Force Model (SFM)—together with a training-free density-aware heuristic, Density-Aware Gradient Routing (DAGR), and two reinforcement-learning approaches, Density-Aware Q-Learning (DAQL) and SARSA. Experiments cover three population scales (N{50,100,200}), normal daytime conditions, staffing-variation scenarios, and a blocked-exit disruption scenario, with 30 independent runs for each main condition. The results show that the rule-based and training-free methods remain the most reliable under full multi-agent evaluation: the SFM and RW achieve the highest completion ratios (approximately 100% and 93.5%, respectively), while DAGR provides the strongest balance between completion and evacuation efficiency among the non-trained methods. In contrast, the trained RL agents perform substantially worse in direct multi-agent deployment with DAQL reaching approximately 37% completion and SARSA approximately 17%, highlighting a train–evaluation distribution shift associated with independent Q-learning. The ablation analysis further shows that collision avoidance is the most critical reward component, whereas density-avoidance shaping can unintentionally induce collective deadlock when all agents execute the learned policy simultaneously. Among the enhanced variants, DAQL_RoleAware yields the best overall improvement, increasing the completion ratio to approximately 52% and reducing the 90th-percentile evacuation time to approximately 363 s. Overall, this paper clarifies both the promise and the present limitations of density-aware reinforcement learning for hospital evacuation while providing a more building-centred and reproducible basis for future coordination-aware evacuation design and emergency-planning research.
Keywords: seismic resilience; hospital evacuation; multi-agent reinforcement learning; density-aware Q-learning; DAGR; SARSA; ablation study; social force model; agent-based modeling; comparative analysis seismic resilience; hospital evacuation; multi-agent reinforcement learning; density-aware Q-learning; DAGR; SARSA; ablation study; social force model; agent-based modeling; comparative analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bian, C.; Guo, Y.; Meng, G.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Lv, F.; Chai, X. Modeling Seismic Resilience and Hospital Evacuation: A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Classical Evacuation Models. Buildings 2026, 16, 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081538

AMA Style

Bian C, Guo Y, Meng G, Li L, Chen H, Lv F, Chai X. Modeling Seismic Resilience and Hospital Evacuation: A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Classical Evacuation Models. Buildings. 2026; 16(8):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bian, Chunlin, Yonghao Guo, Gang Meng, Liuyang Li, Hua Chen, Fuhong Lv, and Xiaofeng Chai. 2026. "Modeling Seismic Resilience and Hospital Evacuation: A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Classical Evacuation Models" Buildings 16, no. 8: 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081538

APA Style

Bian, C., Guo, Y., Meng, G., Li, L., Chen, H., Lv, F., & Chai, X. (2026). Modeling Seismic Resilience and Hospital Evacuation: A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Classical Evacuation Models. Buildings, 16(8), 1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop